FINDING 2024-003 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-043-PN01, 22611-043-ARP, 22619-043-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Significant Deficiency, Other Matters Condition and Context The School Corporation is a member of the Northwest Indiana Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2022-2023, the Cooperative operated the special education program and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 HANOVER COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for nonpublic school students with disabilities was met for each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure nonpublic school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. The non-public expenditures spent did not meet the earmarking requirements for grant award numbers 22611-043-PN01, 22611-043-ARP, and 22619-043-ARP prior to September 2022. From the beginning of the grant awards until September 2022, total grant expenditures were posted as expended. The nonpublic proportionate share expenditures were determined by applying a percentage to the nonpublic school budgeted expenditures. Beginning in September 2022, the Cooperative began tracking expenditures by member school for the nonpublic services. As such, we were unable to identify if the minimum amount per the grant award was expended and properly reported to the IDOE from the beginning of the grant awards through September 2022, as required. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was isolated to 22611-043-PN01, 2611-043-ARP, and 22619-043-ARP grant awards. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 HANOVER COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Cause Through inquiry of the Cooperative management, they were unaware of the requirements to track nonpublic proportionate share expenditures directly for each member school. While the Cooperative did implement new processes and procedures to ensure expenditures were tracked by member schools starting in September 2022, most of the grant awards had been allocated to the member schools based on a percentage of the budget. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the School Corporation was unable to ensure the Cooperative compliance with earmarking requirements and the Cooperative was unable to track expenditures for nonpublic services for each member school. Consequently, the amounts requested for reimbursement were not supported by actual expenditures, but rather a percentage based on the budget per member school. Because of this, expenditures were not accurately reported to the oversight agency. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation Management of the School Corporation should develop written policies and procedures which would require tracking of actual nonpublic proportionate share expenditures by member school by the Cooperative. Documentation should be maintained to show how these expenditures are being tracked to ensure compliance with the earmarking requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Eligibility and Special Tests and Provisions - Non-Profit School Food Accounts Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2023, FY 2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Eligibility, Special Tests and Provisions - Non-Profit School Food Accounts Audit Finding: Material Weakness Condition and Context Eligibility Any child enrolled in a participating school who meets the applicable program's definition of "child," may receive meals under the applicable programs. A child belonging to households meeting nationwide income eligibility requirements may receive meals at no charge or at a reduced price. Children that have been determined ineligible for free or reduced-price meals pay the full price for their meals. A child's eligibility for free and reduced-priced meals under a Child Nutrition Cluster program may be established by the submission of an annual application or statement which furnished such information as family income and family size. The School Corporation determines eligibility by comparing the data reported by the child's household to published income eligibility guidelines. Annual eligibility determinations may also be based on the child's household receiving benefits under SNAP, FDPIR, the Head Start Program, or, under most circumstances, the TANF program. A household may furnish documentation if its participation in one of those programs, or the School Corporation may obtain the information directly from the State or local agency that administers those programs. Certain foster, runaway, homeless, and migrant children are categorically eligible for free school lunches and breakfasts. Direct certified households do not need to complete an application. Paper applications and online applications are processed in the School Corporation's software system to determine if students are eligible for free or reduced meals. Paper applications are input by the Food Service Director for all schools except one. These applications are input by a long-term cafeteria employee and the Food Service Director reviews the data; however, no evidence was provided to show this review. Online applications are directly submitted by parents. A random review of applications is performed by the Food Service Director; however, there was no documentation provided to show this review. The software's determination of eligibility is recalculated by the Food Service Director without an oversight or review process in place to ensure accuracy. Additionally, the Food Service Director downloaded the Direct Certifications file from the CNC Web Portal and uploaded the file into the School Corporation's software on a monthly basis without a documented oversight or review process in place to ensure directly certified students were properly processed. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 SOUTHWEST DUBOIS COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Special Tests and Provisions - Non-Profit School Food Accounts The School Corporation had established an internal control process where the Food Service Director maintained accurate reports and records and provided the information to the School Corporation Chief Financial Officer. However, there was no evidence of that review. The lack of internal controls was systemic throughout the audit period for the Eligibility and the Special Tests and Provisions - Non-Profit School Food Accounts compliance requirements. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause Although the School Corporation had designed a system of internal controls, there was no documented evidence of the implementation of the internal control process. Due to the lack of documentation, it could not be determined if the School Corporation and the Food Service Director had developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement, the Eligibility, and the Special Tests and Provisions - Non-Profit School Food Accounts compliance requirements. Effect The lack of an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements listed above. Without a proper system of internal controls over eligibility, improper determination could go undetected and result in incorrect prices charged to students and improper claiming of federal reimbursement. Without a proper system of internal controls over the Special Tests and Provisions - Non-Profit School Food Accounts, improper reporting of receipts and disbursements could remain undetected and result in improper reporting on the financial statement of the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls and provide documentation of those internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement, the Eligibility, and the Special Tests and Provisions - Non-Profit School Food Accounts compliance requirements. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 SOUTHWEST DUBOIS COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Eligibility and Special Tests and Provisions - Non-Profit School Food Accounts Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2023, FY 2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Eligibility, Special Tests and Provisions - Non-Profit School Food Accounts Audit Finding: Material Weakness Condition and Context Eligibility Any child enrolled in a participating school who meets the applicable program's definition of "child," may receive meals under the applicable programs. A child belonging to households meeting nationwide income eligibility requirements may receive meals at no charge or at a reduced price. Children that have been determined ineligible for free or reduced-price meals pay the full price for their meals. A child's eligibility for free and reduced-priced meals under a Child Nutrition Cluster program may be established by the submission of an annual application or statement which furnished such information as family income and family size. The School Corporation determines eligibility by comparing the data reported by the child's household to published income eligibility guidelines. Annual eligibility determinations may also be based on the child's household receiving benefits under SNAP, FDPIR, the Head Start Program, or, under most circumstances, the TANF program. A household may furnish documentation if its participation in one of those programs, or the School Corporation may obtain the information directly from the State or local agency that administers those programs. Certain foster, runaway, homeless, and migrant children are categorically eligible for free school lunches and breakfasts. Direct certified households do not need to complete an application. Paper applications and online applications are processed in the School Corporation's software system to determine if students are eligible for free or reduced meals. Paper applications are input by the Food Service Director for all schools except one. These applications are input by a long-term cafeteria employee and the Food Service Director reviews the data; however, no evidence was provided to show this review. Online applications are directly submitted by parents. A random review of applications is performed by the Food Service Director; however, there was no documentation provided to show this review. The software's determination of eligibility is recalculated by the Food Service Director without an oversight or review process in place to ensure accuracy. Additionally, the Food Service Director downloaded the Direct Certifications file from the CNC Web Portal and uploaded the file into the School Corporation's software on a monthly basis without a documented oversight or review process in place to ensure directly certified students were properly processed. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 SOUTHWEST DUBOIS COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Special Tests and Provisions - Non-Profit School Food Accounts The School Corporation had established an internal control process where the Food Service Director maintained accurate reports and records and provided the information to the School Corporation Chief Financial Officer. However, there was no evidence of that review. The lack of internal controls was systemic throughout the audit period for the Eligibility and the Special Tests and Provisions - Non-Profit School Food Accounts compliance requirements. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause Although the School Corporation had designed a system of internal controls, there was no documented evidence of the implementation of the internal control process. Due to the lack of documentation, it could not be determined if the School Corporation and the Food Service Director had developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement, the Eligibility, and the Special Tests and Provisions - Non-Profit School Food Accounts compliance requirements. Effect The lack of an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements listed above. Without a proper system of internal controls over eligibility, improper determination could go undetected and result in incorrect prices charged to students and improper claiming of federal reimbursement. Without a proper system of internal controls over the Special Tests and Provisions - Non-Profit School Food Accounts, improper reporting of receipts and disbursements could remain undetected and result in improper reporting on the financial statement of the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls and provide documentation of those internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement, the Eligibility, and the Special Tests and Provisions - Non-Profit School Food Accounts compliance requirements. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 SOUTHWEST DUBOIS COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Eligibility and Special Tests and Provisions - Non-Profit School Food Accounts Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2023, FY 2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Eligibility, Special Tests and Provisions - Non-Profit School Food Accounts Audit Finding: Material Weakness Condition and Context Eligibility Any child enrolled in a participating school who meets the applicable program's definition of "child," may receive meals under the applicable programs. A child belonging to households meeting nationwide income eligibility requirements may receive meals at no charge or at a reduced price. Children that have been determined ineligible for free or reduced-price meals pay the full price for their meals. A child's eligibility for free and reduced-priced meals under a Child Nutrition Cluster program may be established by the submission of an annual application or statement which furnished such information as family income and family size. The School Corporation determines eligibility by comparing the data reported by the child's household to published income eligibility guidelines. Annual eligibility determinations may also be based on the child's household receiving benefits under SNAP, FDPIR, the Head Start Program, or, under most circumstances, the TANF program. A household may furnish documentation if its participation in one of those programs, or the School Corporation may obtain the information directly from the State or local agency that administers those programs. Certain foster, runaway, homeless, and migrant children are categorically eligible for free school lunches and breakfasts. Direct certified households do not need to complete an application. Paper applications and online applications are processed in the School Corporation's software system to determine if students are eligible for free or reduced meals. Paper applications are input by the Food Service Director for all schools except one. These applications are input by a long-term cafeteria employee and the Food Service Director reviews the data; however, no evidence was provided to show this review. Online applications are directly submitted by parents. A random review of applications is performed by the Food Service Director; however, there was no documentation provided to show this review. The software's determination of eligibility is recalculated by the Food Service Director without an oversight or review process in place to ensure accuracy. Additionally, the Food Service Director downloaded the Direct Certifications file from the CNC Web Portal and uploaded the file into the School Corporation's software on a monthly basis without a documented oversight or review process in place to ensure directly certified students were properly processed. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 SOUTHWEST DUBOIS COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Special Tests and Provisions - Non-Profit School Food Accounts The School Corporation had established an internal control process where the Food Service Director maintained accurate reports and records and provided the information to the School Corporation Chief Financial Officer. However, there was no evidence of that review. The lack of internal controls was systemic throughout the audit period for the Eligibility and the Special Tests and Provisions - Non-Profit School Food Accounts compliance requirements. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause Although the School Corporation had designed a system of internal controls, there was no documented evidence of the implementation of the internal control process. Due to the lack of documentation, it could not be determined if the School Corporation and the Food Service Director had developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement, the Eligibility, and the Special Tests and Provisions - Non-Profit School Food Accounts compliance requirements. Effect The lack of an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements listed above. Without a proper system of internal controls over eligibility, improper determination could go undetected and result in incorrect prices charged to students and improper claiming of federal reimbursement. Without a proper system of internal controls over the Special Tests and Provisions - Non-Profit School Food Accounts, improper reporting of receipts and disbursements could remain undetected and result in improper reporting on the financial statement of the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls and provide documentation of those internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement, the Eligibility, and the Special Tests and Provisions - Non-Profit School Food Accounts compliance requirements. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 SOUTHWEST DUBOIS COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Eligibility and Special Tests and Provisions - Non-Profit School Food Accounts Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2023, FY 2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Eligibility, Special Tests and Provisions - Non-Profit School Food Accounts Audit Finding: Material Weakness Condition and Context Eligibility Any child enrolled in a participating school who meets the applicable program's definition of "child," may receive meals under the applicable programs. A child belonging to households meeting nationwide income eligibility requirements may receive meals at no charge or at a reduced price. Children that have been determined ineligible for free or reduced-price meals pay the full price for their meals. A child's eligibility for free and reduced-priced meals under a Child Nutrition Cluster program may be established by the submission of an annual application or statement which furnished such information as family income and family size. The School Corporation determines eligibility by comparing the data reported by the child's household to published income eligibility guidelines. Annual eligibility determinations may also be based on the child's household receiving benefits under SNAP, FDPIR, the Head Start Program, or, under most circumstances, the TANF program. A household may furnish documentation if its participation in one of those programs, or the School Corporation may obtain the information directly from the State or local agency that administers those programs. Certain foster, runaway, homeless, and migrant children are categorically eligible for free school lunches and breakfasts. Direct certified households do not need to complete an application. Paper applications and online applications are processed in the School Corporation's software system to determine if students are eligible for free or reduced meals. Paper applications are input by the Food Service Director for all schools except one. These applications are input by a long-term cafeteria employee and the Food Service Director reviews the data; however, no evidence was provided to show this review. Online applications are directly submitted by parents. A random review of applications is performed by the Food Service Director; however, there was no documentation provided to show this review. The software's determination of eligibility is recalculated by the Food Service Director without an oversight or review process in place to ensure accuracy. Additionally, the Food Service Director downloaded the Direct Certifications file from the CNC Web Portal and uploaded the file into the School Corporation's software on a monthly basis without a documented oversight or review process in place to ensure directly certified students were properly processed. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 SOUTHWEST DUBOIS COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Special Tests and Provisions - Non-Profit School Food Accounts The School Corporation had established an internal control process where the Food Service Director maintained accurate reports and records and provided the information to the School Corporation Chief Financial Officer. However, there was no evidence of that review. The lack of internal controls was systemic throughout the audit period for the Eligibility and the Special Tests and Provisions - Non-Profit School Food Accounts compliance requirements. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause Although the School Corporation had designed a system of internal controls, there was no documented evidence of the implementation of the internal control process. Due to the lack of documentation, it could not be determined if the School Corporation and the Food Service Director had developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement, the Eligibility, and the Special Tests and Provisions - Non-Profit School Food Accounts compliance requirements. Effect The lack of an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements listed above. Without a proper system of internal controls over eligibility, improper determination could go undetected and result in incorrect prices charged to students and improper claiming of federal reimbursement. Without a proper system of internal controls over the Special Tests and Provisions - Non-Profit School Food Accounts, improper reporting of receipts and disbursements could remain undetected and result in improper reporting on the financial statement of the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls and provide documentation of those internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement, the Eligibility, and the Special Tests and Provisions - Non-Profit School Food Accounts compliance requirements. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 SOUTHWEST DUBOIS COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Eligibility and Special Tests and Provisions - Non-Profit School Food Accounts Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2023, FY 2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Eligibility, Special Tests and Provisions - Non-Profit School Food Accounts Audit Finding: Material Weakness Condition and Context Eligibility Any child enrolled in a participating school who meets the applicable program's definition of "child," may receive meals under the applicable programs. A child belonging to households meeting nationwide income eligibility requirements may receive meals at no charge or at a reduced price. Children that have been determined ineligible for free or reduced-price meals pay the full price for their meals. A child's eligibility for free and reduced-priced meals under a Child Nutrition Cluster program may be established by the submission of an annual application or statement which furnished such information as family income and family size. The School Corporation determines eligibility by comparing the data reported by the child's household to published income eligibility guidelines. Annual eligibility determinations may also be based on the child's household receiving benefits under SNAP, FDPIR, the Head Start Program, or, under most circumstances, the TANF program. A household may furnish documentation if its participation in one of those programs, or the School Corporation may obtain the information directly from the State or local agency that administers those programs. Certain foster, runaway, homeless, and migrant children are categorically eligible for free school lunches and breakfasts. Direct certified households do not need to complete an application. Paper applications and online applications are processed in the School Corporation's software system to determine if students are eligible for free or reduced meals. Paper applications are input by the Food Service Director for all schools except one. These applications are input by a long-term cafeteria employee and the Food Service Director reviews the data; however, no evidence was provided to show this review. Online applications are directly submitted by parents. A random review of applications is performed by the Food Service Director; however, there was no documentation provided to show this review. The software's determination of eligibility is recalculated by the Food Service Director without an oversight or review process in place to ensure accuracy. Additionally, the Food Service Director downloaded the Direct Certifications file from the CNC Web Portal and uploaded the file into the School Corporation's software on a monthly basis without a documented oversight or review process in place to ensure directly certified students were properly processed. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 SOUTHWEST DUBOIS COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Special Tests and Provisions - Non-Profit School Food Accounts The School Corporation had established an internal control process where the Food Service Director maintained accurate reports and records and provided the information to the School Corporation Chief Financial Officer. However, there was no evidence of that review. The lack of internal controls was systemic throughout the audit period for the Eligibility and the Special Tests and Provisions - Non-Profit School Food Accounts compliance requirements. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause Although the School Corporation had designed a system of internal controls, there was no documented evidence of the implementation of the internal control process. Due to the lack of documentation, it could not be determined if the School Corporation and the Food Service Director had developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement, the Eligibility, and the Special Tests and Provisions - Non-Profit School Food Accounts compliance requirements. Effect The lack of an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements listed above. Without a proper system of internal controls over eligibility, improper determination could go undetected and result in incorrect prices charged to students and improper claiming of federal reimbursement. Without a proper system of internal controls over the Special Tests and Provisions - Non-Profit School Food Accounts, improper reporting of receipts and disbursements could remain undetected and result in improper reporting on the financial statement of the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls and provide documentation of those internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement, the Eligibility, and the Special Tests and Provisions - Non-Profit School Food Accounts compliance requirements. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 SOUTHWEST DUBOIS COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Eligibility and Special Tests and Provisions - Non-Profit School Food Accounts Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2023, FY 2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Eligibility, Special Tests and Provisions - Non-Profit School Food Accounts Audit Finding: Material Weakness Condition and Context Eligibility Any child enrolled in a participating school who meets the applicable program's definition of "child," may receive meals under the applicable programs. A child belonging to households meeting nationwide income eligibility requirements may receive meals at no charge or at a reduced price. Children that have been determined ineligible for free or reduced-price meals pay the full price for their meals. A child's eligibility for free and reduced-priced meals under a Child Nutrition Cluster program may be established by the submission of an annual application or statement which furnished such information as family income and family size. The School Corporation determines eligibility by comparing the data reported by the child's household to published income eligibility guidelines. Annual eligibility determinations may also be based on the child's household receiving benefits under SNAP, FDPIR, the Head Start Program, or, under most circumstances, the TANF program. A household may furnish documentation if its participation in one of those programs, or the School Corporation may obtain the information directly from the State or local agency that administers those programs. Certain foster, runaway, homeless, and migrant children are categorically eligible for free school lunches and breakfasts. Direct certified households do not need to complete an application. Paper applications and online applications are processed in the School Corporation's software system to determine if students are eligible for free or reduced meals. Paper applications are input by the Food Service Director for all schools except one. These applications are input by a long-term cafeteria employee and the Food Service Director reviews the data; however, no evidence was provided to show this review. Online applications are directly submitted by parents. A random review of applications is performed by the Food Service Director; however, there was no documentation provided to show this review. The software's determination of eligibility is recalculated by the Food Service Director without an oversight or review process in place to ensure accuracy. Additionally, the Food Service Director downloaded the Direct Certifications file from the CNC Web Portal and uploaded the file into the School Corporation's software on a monthly basis without a documented oversight or review process in place to ensure directly certified students were properly processed. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 SOUTHWEST DUBOIS COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Special Tests and Provisions - Non-Profit School Food Accounts The School Corporation had established an internal control process where the Food Service Director maintained accurate reports and records and provided the information to the School Corporation Chief Financial Officer. However, there was no evidence of that review. The lack of internal controls was systemic throughout the audit period for the Eligibility and the Special Tests and Provisions - Non-Profit School Food Accounts compliance requirements. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause Although the School Corporation had designed a system of internal controls, there was no documented evidence of the implementation of the internal control process. Due to the lack of documentation, it could not be determined if the School Corporation and the Food Service Director had developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement, the Eligibility, and the Special Tests and Provisions - Non-Profit School Food Accounts compliance requirements. Effect The lack of an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements listed above. Without a proper system of internal controls over eligibility, improper determination could go undetected and result in incorrect prices charged to students and improper claiming of federal reimbursement. Without a proper system of internal controls over the Special Tests and Provisions - Non-Profit School Food Accounts, improper reporting of receipts and disbursements could remain undetected and result in improper reporting on the financial statement of the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls and provide documentation of those internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement, the Eligibility, and the Special Tests and Provisions - Non-Profit School Food Accounts compliance requirements. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 SOUTHWEST DUBOIS COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-003 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2023, FY 2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context An effective internal control system, which would include segregation of duties, was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a nonfederal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. During the audit period, the School Corporation had two vendors, totaling $900,414, that were considered simplified acquisition purchases. Both vendors were selected for testing. For one vendor in both fiscal years, the School Corporation procured more than $150,000 in services without providing bid tabulations or evaluation criteria for awarding the bid and without obtaining a contract agreement. For the other vendor, services were properly procured; however, the School Corporation did not have a contract with this vendor. During the audit period, the School Corporation had nine vendors, totaling $324,810, that were considered small purchases. Two vendors were selected for testing. For one vendor during the fiscal year 2022-2023, the School Corporation procured $12,830 in services and could not provide evidence of open competition or quotes for the purchase. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 SOUTHWEST DUBOIS COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) During the audit period, the School Corporation had 122 transactions, totaling $106,328, that were considered micro-purchases. Eighteen transactions were selected for testing. Three of the transactions sampled did not include the approval of the Food Service Director per the internal control process. The internal control was not properly implemented. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. Upon inquiry of the School Corporation, in order to review the procedures in place verifying that a vendor with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, the School Corporation disclosed that the Food Service Director verified vendors were not suspended or debarred by reviewing the SAMs exclusions. The School Corporation had three vendors in both fiscal years, and one vendor in 2022-2023 had incurred more than $25,000 in covered transactions, totaling $1,150,939. The School Corporation did not maintain documentation to show that the vendor was verified for suspension and debarment status prior to payment. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 SOUTHWEST DUBOIS COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: (1) Micro-purchases— . . . (ii) Micro-purchase awards. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price or rate quotation if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable based on research, experience, purchase history or other information and documents it files accordingly. . . . (2) Small purchases— (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. The sealed bids method is the preferred method for procuring construction, if the conditions. (i) In order for sealed bidding to be feasible, the following conditions should be present: (A) A complete, adequate, and realistic specification or purchase description is available; INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 SOUTHWEST DUBOIS COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (B) Two or more responsible bidders are willing and able to compete effectively for the business; and (C) The procurement lends itself to a firm fixed price contract and the selection of the successful bidder can be made principally on the basis of price. (ii) If sealed bids are used, the following requirements apply: (A) Bids must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified sources, providing them sufficient response time prior to the date set for opening the bids, for local, and tribal governments, the invitation for bids must be publicly advertised; (B) The invitation for bids, which will include any specifications and pertinent attachments, must define the items or services in order for the bidder to properly respond; (C) All bids will be opened at the time and place prescribed in the invitation for bids, and for local and tribal governments, the bids must be opened publicly; (D) A firm fixed price contract award will be made in writing to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. Where specified in bidding documents, factors such as discounts, transportation cost, and life cycle costs must be considered in determining which bid is lowest. Payment discounts will only be used to determine the low bid when prior experience indicates that such discounts are usually taken advantage of; and (E) Any or all bids may be rejected if there is a sound documented reason. (2) Proposals. A procurement method in which either a fixed price or costreimbursement type contract is awarded. Proposals are generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. They are awarded in accordance with the following requirements: (i) Requests for proposals must be publicized and identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance. Proposals must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified offerors. Any response to publicized requests for proposals must be considered to the maximum extent practical; (ii) The non-Federal entity must have a written method for conducting technical evaluations of the proposals received and making selections; (iii) Contracts must be awarded to the responsible offeror whose proposal is most advantageous to the non-Federal entity, with price and other factors considered; and INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 23 SOUTHWEST DUBOIS COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (iv) The non-Federal entity may use competitive proposal procedures for qualifications based procurement of architectural/engineering (A/E) professional services whereby offeror's qualifications are evaluated and the most qualified offeror is selected, subject to negotiation of fair and reasonable compensation. The method, where price is not used as a selection factor, can only be used in procurement of A/E professional services. It cannot be used to purchase other types of services though A/E firms that are a potential source to perform the proposed effort. . . ." Indiana Code 5-22-8-3 states in part: "(a) This section applies only if the purchasing agency expects the purchase to be: (1) at least fifty thousand ($50,000); and (2) not more than one fifty thousand ($150,000). (b) A purchasing agent may purchase supplies under this section by inviting quotes from at least three (3) persons known to deal in the lines or classes of supplies to be purchased. . . . (d) If the purchasing agency receives a satisfactory quote, the purchasing agent shall award a contract to the lowest responsible and responsive offeror for each line or class of supplies required. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM.gov Exclusions, or (b) Collecting a certification from that person, or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause There was no documented evidence of the internal control process. The School Corporation and the Food Service Director had not developed an adequate system of internal controls that would ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. According to the Food Service Director and the Chief Financial Officer, due to the change of the Food Service Director, the School Corporation did not have the proper safeguards in place to ensure that the documentation was properly maintained. As a result, the Chief Financial Officer and the Food Service Director were unable to locate the documentation for each procurement method. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 24 SOUTHWEST DUBOIS COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Effect The School Corporation was not able to provide the documentation that they followed the proper procurement procedures or that they verified vendors were not suspended or debarred. By not following proper procurement procedures, the School Corporation may not be receiving the most competitive pricing. If the School Corporation does not verify that vendors are not suspended or debarred, the School Corporation may be purchasing from vendors that are not eligible to receive federal funds. Without a proper system of internal controls in place that operated effectively, material noncompliance remained undetected. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommend that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services and contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Documentation of all procurement and suspension and debarment activities should be maintained. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-003 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2023, FY 2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context An effective internal control system, which would include segregation of duties, was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a nonfederal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. During the audit period, the School Corporation had two vendors, totaling $900,414, that were considered simplified acquisition purchases. Both vendors were selected for testing. For one vendor in both fiscal years, the School Corporation procured more than $150,000 in services without providing bid tabulations or evaluation criteria for awarding the bid and without obtaining a contract agreement. For the other vendor, services were properly procured; however, the School Corporation did not have a contract with this vendor. During the audit period, the School Corporation had nine vendors, totaling $324,810, that were considered small purchases. Two vendors were selected for testing. For one vendor during the fiscal year 2022-2023, the School Corporation procured $12,830 in services and could not provide evidence of open competition or quotes for the purchase. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 SOUTHWEST DUBOIS COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) During the audit period, the School Corporation had 122 transactions, totaling $106,328, that were considered micro-purchases. Eighteen transactions were selected for testing. Three of the transactions sampled did not include the approval of the Food Service Director per the internal control process. The internal control was not properly implemented. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. Upon inquiry of the School Corporation, in order to review the procedures in place verifying that a vendor with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, the School Corporation disclosed that the Food Service Director verified vendors were not suspended or debarred by reviewing the SAMs exclusions. The School Corporation had three vendors in both fiscal years, and one vendor in 2022-2023 had incurred more than $25,000 in covered transactions, totaling $1,150,939. The School Corporation did not maintain documentation to show that the vendor was verified for suspension and debarment status prior to payment. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 SOUTHWEST DUBOIS COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: (1) Micro-purchases— . . . (ii) Micro-purchase awards. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price or rate quotation if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable based on research, experience, purchase history or other information and documents it files accordingly. . . . (2) Small purchases— (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. The sealed bids method is the preferred method for procuring construction, if the conditions. (i) In order for sealed bidding to be feasible, the following conditions should be present: (A) A complete, adequate, and realistic specification or purchase description is available; INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 SOUTHWEST DUBOIS COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (B) Two or more responsible bidders are willing and able to compete effectively for the business; and (C) The procurement lends itself to a firm fixed price contract and the selection of the successful bidder can be made principally on the basis of price. (ii) If sealed bids are used, the following requirements apply: (A) Bids must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified sources, providing them sufficient response time prior to the date set for opening the bids, for local, and tribal governments, the invitation for bids must be publicly advertised; (B) The invitation for bids, which will include any specifications and pertinent attachments, must define the items or services in order for the bidder to properly respond; (C) All bids will be opened at the time and place prescribed in the invitation for bids, and for local and tribal governments, the bids must be opened publicly; (D) A firm fixed price contract award will be made in writing to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. Where specified in bidding documents, factors such as discounts, transportation cost, and life cycle costs must be considered in determining which bid is lowest. Payment discounts will only be used to determine the low bid when prior experience indicates that such discounts are usually taken advantage of; and (E) Any or all bids may be rejected if there is a sound documented reason. (2) Proposals. A procurement method in which either a fixed price or costreimbursement type contract is awarded. Proposals are generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. They are awarded in accordance with the following requirements: (i) Requests for proposals must be publicized and identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance. Proposals must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified offerors. Any response to publicized requests for proposals must be considered to the maximum extent practical; (ii) The non-Federal entity must have a written method for conducting technical evaluations of the proposals received and making selections; (iii) Contracts must be awarded to the responsible offeror whose proposal is most advantageous to the non-Federal entity, with price and other factors considered; and INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 23 SOUTHWEST DUBOIS COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (iv) The non-Federal entity may use competitive proposal procedures for qualifications based procurement of architectural/engineering (A/E) professional services whereby offeror's qualifications are evaluated and the most qualified offeror is selected, subject to negotiation of fair and reasonable compensation. The method, where price is not used as a selection factor, can only be used in procurement of A/E professional services. It cannot be used to purchase other types of services though A/E firms that are a potential source to perform the proposed effort. . . ." Indiana Code 5-22-8-3 states in part: "(a) This section applies only if the purchasing agency expects the purchase to be: (1) at least fifty thousand ($50,000); and (2) not more than one fifty thousand ($150,000). (b) A purchasing agent may purchase supplies under this section by inviting quotes from at least three (3) persons known to deal in the lines or classes of supplies to be purchased. . . . (d) If the purchasing agency receives a satisfactory quote, the purchasing agent shall award a contract to the lowest responsible and responsive offeror for each line or class of supplies required. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM.gov Exclusions, or (b) Collecting a certification from that person, or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause There was no documented evidence of the internal control process. The School Corporation and the Food Service Director had not developed an adequate system of internal controls that would ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. According to the Food Service Director and the Chief Financial Officer, due to the change of the Food Service Director, the School Corporation did not have the proper safeguards in place to ensure that the documentation was properly maintained. As a result, the Chief Financial Officer and the Food Service Director were unable to locate the documentation for each procurement method. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 24 SOUTHWEST DUBOIS COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Effect The School Corporation was not able to provide the documentation that they followed the proper procurement procedures or that they verified vendors were not suspended or debarred. By not following proper procurement procedures, the School Corporation may not be receiving the most competitive pricing. If the School Corporation does not verify that vendors are not suspended or debarred, the School Corporation may be purchasing from vendors that are not eligible to receive federal funds. Without a proper system of internal controls in place that operated effectively, material noncompliance remained undetected. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommend that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services and contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Documentation of all procurement and suspension and debarment activities should be maintained. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-003 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2023, FY 2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context An effective internal control system, which would include segregation of duties, was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a nonfederal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. During the audit period, the School Corporation had two vendors, totaling $900,414, that were considered simplified acquisition purchases. Both vendors were selected for testing. For one vendor in both fiscal years, the School Corporation procured more than $150,000 in services without providing bid tabulations or evaluation criteria for awarding the bid and without obtaining a contract agreement. For the other vendor, services were properly procured; however, the School Corporation did not have a contract with this vendor. During the audit period, the School Corporation had nine vendors, totaling $324,810, that were considered small purchases. Two vendors were selected for testing. For one vendor during the fiscal year 2022-2023, the School Corporation procured $12,830 in services and could not provide evidence of open competition or quotes for the purchase. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 SOUTHWEST DUBOIS COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) During the audit period, the School Corporation had 122 transactions, totaling $106,328, that were considered micro-purchases. Eighteen transactions were selected for testing. Three of the transactions sampled did not include the approval of the Food Service Director per the internal control process. The internal control was not properly implemented. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. Upon inquiry of the School Corporation, in order to review the procedures in place verifying that a vendor with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, the School Corporation disclosed that the Food Service Director verified vendors were not suspended or debarred by reviewing the SAMs exclusions. The School Corporation had three vendors in both fiscal years, and one vendor in 2022-2023 had incurred more than $25,000 in covered transactions, totaling $1,150,939. The School Corporation did not maintain documentation to show that the vendor was verified for suspension and debarment status prior to payment. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 SOUTHWEST DUBOIS COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: (1) Micro-purchases— . . . (ii) Micro-purchase awards. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price or rate quotation if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable based on research, experience, purchase history or other information and documents it files accordingly. . . . (2) Small purchases— (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. The sealed bids method is the preferred method for procuring construction, if the conditions. (i) In order for sealed bidding to be feasible, the following conditions should be present: (A) A complete, adequate, and realistic specification or purchase description is available; INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 SOUTHWEST DUBOIS COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (B) Two or more responsible bidders are willing and able to compete effectively for the business; and (C) The procurement lends itself to a firm fixed price contract and the selection of the successful bidder can be made principally on the basis of price. (ii) If sealed bids are used, the following requirements apply: (A) Bids must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified sources, providing them sufficient response time prior to the date set for opening the bids, for local, and tribal governments, the invitation for bids must be publicly advertised; (B) The invitation for bids, which will include any specifications and pertinent attachments, must define the items or services in order for the bidder to properly respond; (C) All bids will be opened at the time and place prescribed in the invitation for bids, and for local and tribal governments, the bids must be opened publicly; (D) A firm fixed price contract award will be made in writing to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. Where specified in bidding documents, factors such as discounts, transportation cost, and life cycle costs must be considered in determining which bid is lowest. Payment discounts will only be used to determine the low bid when prior experience indicates that such discounts are usually taken advantage of; and (E) Any or all bids may be rejected if there is a sound documented reason. (2) Proposals. A procurement method in which either a fixed price or costreimbursement type contract is awarded. Proposals are generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. They are awarded in accordance with the following requirements: (i) Requests for proposals must be publicized and identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance. Proposals must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified offerors. Any response to publicized requests for proposals must be considered to the maximum extent practical; (ii) The non-Federal entity must have a written method for conducting technical evaluations of the proposals received and making selections; (iii) Contracts must be awarded to the responsible offeror whose proposal is most advantageous to the non-Federal entity, with price and other factors considered; and INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 23 SOUTHWEST DUBOIS COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (iv) The non-Federal entity may use competitive proposal procedures for qualifications based procurement of architectural/engineering (A/E) professional services whereby offeror's qualifications are evaluated and the most qualified offeror is selected, subject to negotiation of fair and reasonable compensation. The method, where price is not used as a selection factor, can only be used in procurement of A/E professional services. It cannot be used to purchase other types of services though A/E firms that are a potential source to perform the proposed effort. . . ." Indiana Code 5-22-8-3 states in part: "(a) This section applies only if the purchasing agency expects the purchase to be: (1) at least fifty thousand ($50,000); and (2) not more than one fifty thousand ($150,000). (b) A purchasing agent may purchase supplies under this section by inviting quotes from at least three (3) persons known to deal in the lines or classes of supplies to be purchased. . . . (d) If the purchasing agency receives a satisfactory quote, the purchasing agent shall award a contract to the lowest responsible and responsive offeror for each line or class of supplies required. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM.gov Exclusions, or (b) Collecting a certification from that person, or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause There was no documented evidence of the internal control process. The School Corporation and the Food Service Director had not developed an adequate system of internal controls that would ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. According to the Food Service Director and the Chief Financial Officer, due to the change of the Food Service Director, the School Corporation did not have the proper safeguards in place to ensure that the documentation was properly maintained. As a result, the Chief Financial Officer and the Food Service Director were unable to locate the documentation for each procurement method. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 24 SOUTHWEST DUBOIS COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Effect The School Corporation was not able to provide the documentation that they followed the proper procurement procedures or that they verified vendors were not suspended or debarred. By not following proper procurement procedures, the School Corporation may not be receiving the most competitive pricing. If the School Corporation does not verify that vendors are not suspended or debarred, the School Corporation may be purchasing from vendors that are not eligible to receive federal funds. Without a proper system of internal controls in place that operated effectively, material noncompliance remained undetected. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommend that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services and contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Documentation of all procurement and suspension and debarment activities should be maintained. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-003 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2023, FY 2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context An effective internal control system, which would include segregation of duties, was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a nonfederal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. During the audit period, the School Corporation had two vendors, totaling $900,414, that were considered simplified acquisition purchases. Both vendors were selected for testing. For one vendor in both fiscal years, the School Corporation procured more than $150,000 in services without providing bid tabulations or evaluation criteria for awarding the bid and without obtaining a contract agreement. For the other vendor, services were properly procured; however, the School Corporation did not have a contract with this vendor. During the audit period, the School Corporation had nine vendors, totaling $324,810, that were considered small purchases. Two vendors were selected for testing. For one vendor during the fiscal year 2022-2023, the School Corporation procured $12,830 in services and could not provide evidence of open competition or quotes for the purchase. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 SOUTHWEST DUBOIS COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) During the audit period, the School Corporation had 122 transactions, totaling $106,328, that were considered micro-purchases. Eighteen transactions were selected for testing. Three of the transactions sampled did not include the approval of the Food Service Director per the internal control process. The internal control was not properly implemented. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. Upon inquiry of the School Corporation, in order to review the procedures in place verifying that a vendor with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, the School Corporation disclosed that the Food Service Director verified vendors were not suspended or debarred by reviewing the SAMs exclusions. The School Corporation had three vendors in both fiscal years, and one vendor in 2022-2023 had incurred more than $25,000 in covered transactions, totaling $1,150,939. The School Corporation did not maintain documentation to show that the vendor was verified for suspension and debarment status prior to payment. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 SOUTHWEST DUBOIS COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: (1) Micro-purchases— . . . (ii) Micro-purchase awards. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price or rate quotation if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable based on research, experience, purchase history or other information and documents it files accordingly. . . . (2) Small purchases— (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. The sealed bids method is the preferred method for procuring construction, if the conditions. (i) In order for sealed bidding to be feasible, the following conditions should be present: (A) A complete, adequate, and realistic specification or purchase description is available; INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 SOUTHWEST DUBOIS COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (B) Two or more responsible bidders are willing and able to compete effectively for the business; and (C) The procurement lends itself to a firm fixed price contract and the selection of the successful bidder can be made principally on the basis of price. (ii) If sealed bids are used, the following requirements apply: (A) Bids must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified sources, providing them sufficient response time prior to the date set for opening the bids, for local, and tribal governments, the invitation for bids must be publicly advertised; (B) The invitation for bids, which will include any specifications and pertinent attachments, must define the items or services in order for the bidder to properly respond; (C) All bids will be opened at the time and place prescribed in the invitation for bids, and for local and tribal governments, the bids must be opened publicly; (D) A firm fixed price contract award will be made in writing to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. Where specified in bidding documents, factors such as discounts, transportation cost, and life cycle costs must be considered in determining which bid is lowest. Payment discounts will only be used to determine the low bid when prior experience indicates that such discounts are usually taken advantage of; and (E) Any or all bids may be rejected if there is a sound documented reason. (2) Proposals. A procurement method in which either a fixed price or costreimbursement type contract is awarded. Proposals are generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. They are awarded in accordance with the following requirements: (i) Requests for proposals must be publicized and identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance. Proposals must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified offerors. Any response to publicized requests for proposals must be considered to the maximum extent practical; (ii) The non-Federal entity must have a written method for conducting technical evaluations of the proposals received and making selections; (iii) Contracts must be awarded to the responsible offeror whose proposal is most advantageous to the non-Federal entity, with price and other factors considered; and INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 23 SOUTHWEST DUBOIS COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (iv) The non-Federal entity may use competitive proposal procedures for qualifications based procurement of architectural/engineering (A/E) professional services whereby offeror's qualifications are evaluated and the most qualified offeror is selected, subject to negotiation of fair and reasonable compensation. The method, where price is not used as a selection factor, can only be used in procurement of A/E professional services. It cannot be used to purchase other types of services though A/E firms that are a potential source to perform the proposed effort. . . ." Indiana Code 5-22-8-3 states in part: "(a) This section applies only if the purchasing agency expects the purchase to be: (1) at least fifty thousand ($50,000); and (2) not more than one fifty thousand ($150,000). (b) A purchasing agent may purchase supplies under this section by inviting quotes from at least three (3) persons known to deal in the lines or classes of supplies to be purchased. . . . (d) If the purchasing agency receives a satisfactory quote, the purchasing agent shall award a contract to the lowest responsible and responsive offeror for each line or class of supplies required. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM.gov Exclusions, or (b) Collecting a certification from that person, or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause There was no documented evidence of the internal control process. The School Corporation and the Food Service Director had not developed an adequate system of internal controls that would ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. According to the Food Service Director and the Chief Financial Officer, due to the change of the Food Service Director, the School Corporation did not have the proper safeguards in place to ensure that the documentation was properly maintained. As a result, the Chief Financial Officer and the Food Service Director were unable to locate the documentation for each procurement method. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 24 SOUTHWEST DUBOIS COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Effect The School Corporation was not able to provide the documentation that they followed the proper procurement procedures or that they verified vendors were not suspended or debarred. By not following proper procurement procedures, the School Corporation may not be receiving the most competitive pricing. If the School Corporation does not verify that vendors are not suspended or debarred, the School Corporation may be purchasing from vendors that are not eligible to receive federal funds. Without a proper system of internal controls in place that operated effectively, material noncompliance remained undetected. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommend that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services and contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Documentation of all procurement and suspension and debarment activities should be maintained. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-003 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2023, FY 2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context An effective internal control system, which would include segregation of duties, was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a nonfederal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. During the audit period, the School Corporation had two vendors, totaling $900,414, that were considered simplified acquisition purchases. Both vendors were selected for testing. For one vendor in both fiscal years, the School Corporation procured more than $150,000 in services without providing bid tabulations or evaluation criteria for awarding the bid and without obtaining a contract agreement. For the other vendor, services were properly procured; however, the School Corporation did not have a contract with this vendor. During the audit period, the School Corporation had nine vendors, totaling $324,810, that were considered small purchases. Two vendors were selected for testing. For one vendor during the fiscal year 2022-2023, the School Corporation procured $12,830 in services and could not provide evidence of open competition or quotes for the purchase. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 SOUTHWEST DUBOIS COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) During the audit period, the School Corporation had 122 transactions, totaling $106,328, that were considered micro-purchases. Eighteen transactions were selected for testing. Three of the transactions sampled did not include the approval of the Food Service Director per the internal control process. The internal control was not properly implemented. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. Upon inquiry of the School Corporation, in order to review the procedures in place verifying that a vendor with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, the School Corporation disclosed that the Food Service Director verified vendors were not suspended or debarred by reviewing the SAMs exclusions. The School Corporation had three vendors in both fiscal years, and one vendor in 2022-2023 had incurred more than $25,000 in covered transactions, totaling $1,150,939. The School Corporation did not maintain documentation to show that the vendor was verified for suspension and debarment status prior to payment. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 SOUTHWEST DUBOIS COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: (1) Micro-purchases— . . . (ii) Micro-purchase awards. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price or rate quotation if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable based on research, experience, purchase history or other information and documents it files accordingly. . . . (2) Small purchases— (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. The sealed bids method is the preferred method for procuring construction, if the conditions. (i) In order for sealed bidding to be feasible, the following conditions should be present: (A) A complete, adequate, and realistic specification or purchase description is available; INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 SOUTHWEST DUBOIS COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (B) Two or more responsible bidders are willing and able to compete effectively for the business; and (C) The procurement lends itself to a firm fixed price contract and the selection of the successful bidder can be made principally on the basis of price. (ii) If sealed bids are used, the following requirements apply: (A) Bids must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified sources, providing them sufficient response time prior to the date set for opening the bids, for local, and tribal governments, the invitation for bids must be publicly advertised; (B) The invitation for bids, which will include any specifications and pertinent attachments, must define the items or services in order for the bidder to properly respond; (C) All bids will be opened at the time and place prescribed in the invitation for bids, and for local and tribal governments, the bids must be opened publicly; (D) A firm fixed price contract award will be made in writing to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. Where specified in bidding documents, factors such as discounts, transportation cost, and life cycle costs must be considered in determining which bid is lowest. Payment discounts will only be used to determine the low bid when prior experience indicates that such discounts are usually taken advantage of; and (E) Any or all bids may be rejected if there is a sound documented reason. (2) Proposals. A procurement method in which either a fixed price or costreimbursement type contract is awarded. Proposals are generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. They are awarded in accordance with the following requirements: (i) Requests for proposals must be publicized and identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance. Proposals must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified offerors. Any response to publicized requests for proposals must be considered to the maximum extent practical; (ii) The non-Federal entity must have a written method for conducting technical evaluations of the proposals received and making selections; (iii) Contracts must be awarded to the responsible offeror whose proposal is most advantageous to the non-Federal entity, with price and other factors considered; and INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 23 SOUTHWEST DUBOIS COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (iv) The non-Federal entity may use competitive proposal procedures for qualifications based procurement of architectural/engineering (A/E) professional services whereby offeror's qualifications are evaluated and the most qualified offeror is selected, subject to negotiation of fair and reasonable compensation. The method, where price is not used as a selection factor, can only be used in procurement of A/E professional services. It cannot be used to purchase other types of services though A/E firms that are a potential source to perform the proposed effort. . . ." Indiana Code 5-22-8-3 states in part: "(a) This section applies only if the purchasing agency expects the purchase to be: (1) at least fifty thousand ($50,000); and (2) not more than one fifty thousand ($150,000). (b) A purchasing agent may purchase supplies under this section by inviting quotes from at least three (3) persons known to deal in the lines or classes of supplies to be purchased. . . . (d) If the purchasing agency receives a satisfactory quote, the purchasing agent shall award a contract to the lowest responsible and responsive offeror for each line or class of supplies required. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM.gov Exclusions, or (b) Collecting a certification from that person, or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause There was no documented evidence of the internal control process. The School Corporation and the Food Service Director had not developed an adequate system of internal controls that would ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. According to the Food Service Director and the Chief Financial Officer, due to the change of the Food Service Director, the School Corporation did not have the proper safeguards in place to ensure that the documentation was properly maintained. As a result, the Chief Financial Officer and the Food Service Director were unable to locate the documentation for each procurement method. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 24 SOUTHWEST DUBOIS COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Effect The School Corporation was not able to provide the documentation that they followed the proper procurement procedures or that they verified vendors were not suspended or debarred. By not following proper procurement procedures, the School Corporation may not be receiving the most competitive pricing. If the School Corporation does not verify that vendors are not suspended or debarred, the School Corporation may be purchasing from vendors that are not eligible to receive federal funds. Without a proper system of internal controls in place that operated effectively, material noncompliance remained undetected. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommend that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services and contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Documentation of all procurement and suspension and debarment activities should be maintained. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-003 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2023, FY 2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context An effective internal control system, which would include segregation of duties, was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a nonfederal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. During the audit period, the School Corporation had two vendors, totaling $900,414, that were considered simplified acquisition purchases. Both vendors were selected for testing. For one vendor in both fiscal years, the School Corporation procured more than $150,000 in services without providing bid tabulations or evaluation criteria for awarding the bid and without obtaining a contract agreement. For the other vendor, services were properly procured; however, the School Corporation did not have a contract with this vendor. During the audit period, the School Corporation had nine vendors, totaling $324,810, that were considered small purchases. Two vendors were selected for testing. For one vendor during the fiscal year 2022-2023, the School Corporation procured $12,830 in services and could not provide evidence of open competition or quotes for the purchase. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 SOUTHWEST DUBOIS COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) During the audit period, the School Corporation had 122 transactions, totaling $106,328, that were considered micro-purchases. Eighteen transactions were selected for testing. Three of the transactions sampled did not include the approval of the Food Service Director per the internal control process. The internal control was not properly implemented. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. Upon inquiry of the School Corporation, in order to review the procedures in place verifying that a vendor with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, the School Corporation disclosed that the Food Service Director verified vendors were not suspended or debarred by reviewing the SAMs exclusions. The School Corporation had three vendors in both fiscal years, and one vendor in 2022-2023 had incurred more than $25,000 in covered transactions, totaling $1,150,939. The School Corporation did not maintain documentation to show that the vendor was verified for suspension and debarment status prior to payment. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 SOUTHWEST DUBOIS COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: (1) Micro-purchases— . . . (ii) Micro-purchase awards. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price or rate quotation if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable based on research, experience, purchase history or other information and documents it files accordingly. . . . (2) Small purchases— (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. The sealed bids method is the preferred method for procuring construction, if the conditions. (i) In order for sealed bidding to be feasible, the following conditions should be present: (A) A complete, adequate, and realistic specification or purchase description is available; INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 SOUTHWEST DUBOIS COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (B) Two or more responsible bidders are willing and able to compete effectively for the business; and (C) The procurement lends itself to a firm fixed price contract and the selection of the successful bidder can be made principally on the basis of price. (ii) If sealed bids are used, the following requirements apply: (A) Bids must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified sources, providing them sufficient response time prior to the date set for opening the bids, for local, and tribal governments, the invitation for bids must be publicly advertised; (B) The invitation for bids, which will include any specifications and pertinent attachments, must define the items or services in order for the bidder to properly respond; (C) All bids will be opened at the time and place prescribed in the invitation for bids, and for local and tribal governments, the bids must be opened publicly; (D) A firm fixed price contract award will be made in writing to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. Where specified in bidding documents, factors such as discounts, transportation cost, and life cycle costs must be considered in determining which bid is lowest. Payment discounts will only be used to determine the low bid when prior experience indicates that such discounts are usually taken advantage of; and (E) Any or all bids may be rejected if there is a sound documented reason. (2) Proposals. A procurement method in which either a fixed price or costreimbursement type contract is awarded. Proposals are generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. They are awarded in accordance with the following requirements: (i) Requests for proposals must be publicized and identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance. Proposals must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified offerors. Any response to publicized requests for proposals must be considered to the maximum extent practical; (ii) The non-Federal entity must have a written method for conducting technical evaluations of the proposals received and making selections; (iii) Contracts must be awarded to the responsible offeror whose proposal is most advantageous to the non-Federal entity, with price and other factors considered; and INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 23 SOUTHWEST DUBOIS COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (iv) The non-Federal entity may use competitive proposal procedures for qualifications based procurement of architectural/engineering (A/E) professional services whereby offeror's qualifications are evaluated and the most qualified offeror is selected, subject to negotiation of fair and reasonable compensation. The method, where price is not used as a selection factor, can only be used in procurement of A/E professional services. It cannot be used to purchase other types of services though A/E firms that are a potential source to perform the proposed effort. . . ." Indiana Code 5-22-8-3 states in part: "(a) This section applies only if the purchasing agency expects the purchase to be: (1) at least fifty thousand ($50,000); and (2) not more than one fifty thousand ($150,000). (b) A purchasing agent may purchase supplies under this section by inviting quotes from at least three (3) persons known to deal in the lines or classes of supplies to be purchased. . . . (d) If the purchasing agency receives a satisfactory quote, the purchasing agent shall award a contract to the lowest responsible and responsive offeror for each line or class of supplies required. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM.gov Exclusions, or (b) Collecting a certification from that person, or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause There was no documented evidence of the internal control process. The School Corporation and the Food Service Director had not developed an adequate system of internal controls that would ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. According to the Food Service Director and the Chief Financial Officer, due to the change of the Food Service Director, the School Corporation did not have the proper safeguards in place to ensure that the documentation was properly maintained. As a result, the Chief Financial Officer and the Food Service Director were unable to locate the documentation for each procurement method. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 24 SOUTHWEST DUBOIS COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Effect The School Corporation was not able to provide the documentation that they followed the proper procurement procedures or that they verified vendors were not suspended or debarred. By not following proper procurement procedures, the School Corporation may not be receiving the most competitive pricing. If the School Corporation does not verify that vendors are not suspended or debarred, the School Corporation may be purchasing from vendors that are not eligible to receive federal funds. Without a proper system of internal controls in place that operated effectively, material noncompliance remained undetected. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommend that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services and contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Documentation of all procurement and suspension and debarment activities should be maintained. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 requires that a non-federal entity must “(a) establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the comptroller General of the United States and the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.403 requires that costs “be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award.” Costs should not consist of improper payments, including payments that were not eligible under the award document. Condition: The Town received a reimbursement for a cost from an award for “blighted property” that was not an eligible expense under the grant agreement. Cause: The Town’s controls related to allowable costs for individual grant agreements were not operating effectively. Effect or Potential Effect: Unallowable expenditures may have been paid with federal funds. Questioned Costs: $19,569 Context: Total federal expenditures for the Community Development Block Grants-State's Program and Non-Entitlement Grants in Hawaii were $1,450,668 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024. Identification of a Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding from the prior year. Recommendation: Officials should ensure that the control of personnel adequately reviewing award requirements before submitting for reimbursement of a particular cost is operating effectively. Furthermore, officials should consider a secondary review of reimbursement requests. Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the finding and has developed a plan to correct the issue.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 requires that a non-federal entity must “(a) establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the comptroller General of the United States and the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.403 requires that costs “be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award.” Costs should not consist of improper payments, including payments that were not eligible under the award document. Condition: The Town received a reimbursement for a cost from an award for “blighted property” that was not an eligible expense under the grant agreement. Cause: The Town’s controls related to allowable costs for individual grant agreements were not operating effectively. Effect or Potential Effect: Unallowable expenditures may have been paid with federal funds. Questioned Costs: $19,569 Context: Total federal expenditures for the Community Development Block Grants-State's Program and Non-Entitlement Grants in Hawaii were $1,450,668 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024. Identification of a Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding from the prior year. Recommendation: Officials should ensure that the control of personnel adequately reviewing award requirements before submitting for reimbursement of a particular cost is operating effectively. Furthermore, officials should consider a secondary review of reimbursement requests. Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the finding and has developed a plan to correct the issue.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 requires that a non-federal entity must “(a) establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the comptroller General of the United States and the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.403 requires that costs “be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award.” Costs should not consist of improper payments, including payments that were not eligible under the award document. Condition: The Town received a reimbursement for a cost from an award for “blighted property” that was not an eligible expense under the grant agreement. Cause: The Town’s controls related to allowable costs for individual grant agreements were not operating effectively. Effect or Potential Effect: Unallowable expenditures may have been paid with federal funds. Questioned Costs: $19,569 Context: Total federal expenditures for the Community Development Block Grants-State's Program and Non-Entitlement Grants in Hawaii were $1,450,668 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024. Identification of a Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding from the prior year. Recommendation: Officials should ensure that the control of personnel adequately reviewing award requirements before submitting for reimbursement of a particular cost is operating effectively. Furthermore, officials should consider a secondary review of reimbursement requests. Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the finding and has developed a plan to correct the issue.
Finding Number: 2024‐002 Repeat Finding: No Program Names/Assistance Listing Titles: Assistance Listing Numbers: Federal Award Numbers: Questioned Costs: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies 84.010 S010A230003 N/A Education Stabilization Fund 84.425U, 84.425W S425U210038, S425W210003 N/A Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass‐Through Agency: Arizona Department of Education Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Period of Performance Criteria Under 2CFR §200.303, District management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal controls over journal entries that are adequate to ensure that all financial activities are properly processed and recorded. All journal entries related to federal monies must be supported by documentation, signed, dated, properly recorded, and approved by an authorized person. Condition The District did not follow federal regulations and guidelines related to activities allowed or unallowed and period of performance. Cause Due to turnover in the District’s finance office and not following established procedures. Controls in place were not always followed. Effect The District was not in compliance with federal regulations and guidelines related to activities allowed or unallowed and period of performance. Context For three of 10 journal entries reviewed from the Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies program, the journal entry was not approved by an authorized person other than the preparer. Finally, for two of five journal entries reviewed from the Education Stabilization Fund, the journal entry was not approved by an authorized person other than the preparer. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation The District should follow journal entry procedures established to ensure compliance with federal requirements. Views of Responsible Officials See Corrective Action Plan.
Finding Number: 2024‐002 Repeat Finding: No Program Names/Assistance Listing Titles: Assistance Listing Numbers: Federal Award Numbers: Questioned Costs: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies 84.010 S010A230003 N/A Education Stabilization Fund 84.425U, 84.425W S425U210038, S425W210003 N/A Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass‐Through Agency: Arizona Department of Education Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Period of Performance Criteria Under 2CFR §200.303, District management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal controls over journal entries that are adequate to ensure that all financial activities are properly processed and recorded. All journal entries related to federal monies must be supported by documentation, signed, dated, properly recorded, and approved by an authorized person. Condition The District did not follow federal regulations and guidelines related to activities allowed or unallowed and period of performance. Cause Due to turnover in the District’s finance office and not following established procedures. Controls in place were not always followed. Effect The District was not in compliance with federal regulations and guidelines related to activities allowed or unallowed and period of performance. Context For three of 10 journal entries reviewed from the Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies program, the journal entry was not approved by an authorized person other than the preparer. Finally, for two of five journal entries reviewed from the Education Stabilization Fund, the journal entry was not approved by an authorized person other than the preparer. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation The District should follow journal entry procedures established to ensure compliance with federal requirements. Views of Responsible Officials See Corrective Action Plan.
Department of Education and Passed through State of Iowa Department of Education Federal Financial Assistance Listing #84.287, C14-SHIP, C15-SHIP, C16-SHIP, C17-SHIP, C18-SHIP, 7/1/2023 – 6/30/2024 Twenty-First Century Community Learning Centers Program Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: The Organization is required to have procedures in place to ensure that federal awards are expended only for allowable costs in accordance with Subpart E – Cost Principles of the Uniform Guidance. Allowable costs are supported by appropriate documentation and correctly charged as to account, amount, and period. 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Iowa Department of Education Guide to Program Budgets and Accounting for the 21st Century Community Learning Centers program provides that an organization participating in the program may expend no more than 8 percent of annual funding on general administration and indirect costs. Further, indirect costs are to be recovered only to the extent of direct costs incurred. Condition: Through review of indirect costs charged to the federal awards, we noted the Organization charged an 8% administrative indirect cost rate to the federal awards, however, calculated the 8% on the budgeted grant award rather than on the actual direct costs incurred under the federal award for the first three quarters of the grant period. Cause: The Organization was not aware that the indirect cost rate should be applied pro rata to the underlying direct costs prior to the completion of the prior year audit. Effect: The Organization’s controls did not detect or correct the errors identified. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs over $25,000. Context: Two quarters out of four quarters of indirect costs charged to the federal awards were selected for testing, which accounted for $17,547 of $44,268 total indirect costs charged to the federal award. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: Yes, Finding 2023-003 Recommendation: We acknowledge the Organization revised their procedures following the prior year audit. We recommend management continue to review procedures over the allocation of indirect costs to ensure indirect amounts charged to the program are based on actual underlying direct costs and that the total indirect allocation of general administration costs does not exceed the rate allowed by the federal program. Views of Responsible Officials: Management is in agreement.
Department of Labor Federal Financial Assistance Listing #17.270, YF-38599-22-60-A-19, 7/1/2023 – 6/30/2024 Reentry Employment Opportunities Procurement, Suspension & Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Noncompliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) states that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR 200.318 maintains that recipients must have and use documented procurement policies and must conform to procurement standards in sections 200.317 through 200.327. As outlined in 2 CFR 180, recipients must not utilize any vendor which is suspended or debarred or is otherwise excluded from the central contractor registry. Condition: The organization’s procurement policy did not contain all of the required procurement standards and contract provisions as required by Uniform Guidance. The organization entered into a covered transaction with a vendor before performing a review to ensure the vendor was not suspended or debarred. Cause: The Organization was unaware of the missing items from the procurement standards and contract provisions. The Organization did not follow their formal procurement policy prior to entering into a covered transaction with a vendor to ensure that vendor was not suspended or debarred. Effect: Lack of compliance with established internal control procedures may result in noncompliance with the program. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context: There was one contract subject to procurement, suspension and debarment during the year which was tested. The vendor was not included on the suspended or debarred list. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: We recommend management review their procedures over procurement, suspension and debarment to ensure they align with Uniform Guidance requirements. The procedures should also be reviewed with those individuals charged with entering into contracts to ensure a complete understanding of all federal requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: Management is in agreement.
Department of Labor Federal Financial Assistance Listing #17.270, YF-38599-22-60-A-19, 7/1/2023 – 6/30/2024 Reentry Employment Opportunities Reporting Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) states that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR 200.328 requires the auditee to submit financial reports as required by the federal award. Section 12.l. of the grant agreement requires quarterly financial reports on the ETA-9130 Financial Report which notes all financial data is required to be reported cumulative from grant inception, through the end of each reporting period. Expenditure data is required to be reported on an accrual basis. Condition: We identified that the 9130 financial reports were completed on the cash basis of accounting and were completed as of the date the report was submitted and not based on the specified quarterly reporting period. Additionally, documentation was not retained to support the numbers reported and there was no documented review or approval over the 9130 quarterly reports. Cause: Documentation was not retained to support the amounts being reported on the 9130 quarterly reports. Additionally, there was no documented review and approval. Effect: Without retaining documentation to support the amounts reported and to support oversight over the reporting process, demonstrating that the program complies with laws, regulations, and other compliance requirements is difficult. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context: In a statistical sample of four quarters, two quarters were selected for testing. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: We recommend that management review the grant reporting requirements to ensure and understanding of the required reporting information. In addition, we suggest the Organization’s internal control procedures be reviewed and updated to include steps to retain the documentation which supports the information being reported to the federal government. Those procedures should also incorporate documentation of the review and approval of the quarterly reports prior to submission. Views of Responsible Officials: Management is in agreement.
Department of Labor Federal Financial Assistance Listing #17.270, YF-38599-22-60-A-19, 7/1/2023 – 6/30/2024 Reentry Employment Opportunities Cash Management Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) states that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Condition: There were two months identified in which the draw request amount for the Reentry Employment Opportunities program was inadvertently switched with a draw request for a different federal program. The expenditures for the Reentry Employment Opportunities program were incurred prior to the draw down request being completed. Cause: The review and approval over the draw request did not identify the misclassification between the two grant programs. Effect: The Organization’s controls did not timely detect the error. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context: A non-statistical sample of four out of twelve months were selected for testing. All draws submitted within the selected months were tested. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: We acknowledge a review process is in place, however we recommend that management strengthen their controls surrounding the cash management process to ensure the review of funds being requested for reimbursement agree to the grant program supporting documentation. Views of Responsible Officials: Management is in agreement.
Department of Justice Federal Financial Assistance Listing #16.812, 15PJDP-22-GG-03256-SCAX and 15PBJA-22-GG-04601-SCAX, 7/1/2023 – 6/30/2024 Second Chance Act Reentry Initiative Cash Management Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Noncompliance for a Non-Major Program Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) states that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR 200.305 states that recipients’ payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the Federal agency and the disbursement of funds by the recipient. Under Part 3, section C. of the Compliance supplement, for grants that are funded on a reimbursement basis, expenditures need to be incurred prior to the date of the reimbursement request. Condition: There were two months out of twelve where the draw request amount for the Second Chance Act Reentry program was switched with a draw request for another federal program. The draw request amount exceeded the actual expenditures incurred for these two months. Cause: The review and approval over the draw request did not identify the misclassification between the two grant programs. Effect: The draw request amounts for the Second Chance Act Reentry program exceeded the actual expenditures incurred for the two months by $55,054. Questioned Costs: $55,054. Context: A non-statistical sample of four out of twelve months were initially selected for testing. All draws submitted within the selected months were ultimately tested. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: We acknowledge a review process is in place, however we recommend that management strengthen their controls surrounding the cash management process to ensure the review of funds being requested for reimbursement agree to the grant program supporting documentation. Views of Responsible Officials: Management is in agreement.
FINDING #2024-003 – INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER FEDERAL AWARDS Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Program Title: Student Financial Assistance Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.007, 84.033, 84.063 and 84.268 Award Period: July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Noncompliance Criteria or Specific Requirement: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, nonfederal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition / Context: During our audit procedures, we noted instances where students are overpaid student financial aid due to changes in student units. The amounts reported to the Common Origination and Disbursement system were correctly reported resulting in the overpayment being disbursed from the District’s funds. The District is paying students based on census enrollment and not adjusting for any changes in enrollment. Questioned Costs: None. Cause: Inadequate controls over student information changes allowing the institution to identify changes in enrollment and adjust financial aid accordingly. Effect: Overpayment by the District where the District must use funds from the General Fund to cover the overpayment. Repeat Finding: Yes. Recommendation: We recommend the institution review its processes over student information changes and ensure that students are being awarded the proper amount of financial aid based on enrollment at the time of disbursement to prevent having to cover overpayments through the General Fund. Corrective Action Plan: These initial Pell overpayments were incurred in the “early” Pell disbursements that occurred a week before the semester started and the first two weeks of the semester. The enrollment was reported correctly, but part of the issue was the current FA system (SAM) was not programmed to adjust the amount disbursed based on the student’s current enrollment at the time of disbursement. For the Spring 2024 semester, testing was done on SAM to disburse aid based on current enrollment for the early Spring 2024 disbursements. This change reduced the amount in overpayments if students drop below ½ time for the semester, or withdrew completely. In addition, the Financial Aid Office transitioned from SAM to the Colleague Financial Aid System (starting in 2024-25). Colleague is already programmed to disburse aid based on current enrollment status, so this will not be a recurring issue in the future. Early Disbursement and Overpayment Notes: • For Fall 2023 semester, the first early Pell disbursement was based on 25% of a student’s semester award based on full-time enrollment. If a student is currently enrolled ½-time or higher when this disbursement is processed, they will receive the 25% award amount. If a student is enrolled in less than ½-time status (.5 units to 5.5 units), they will receive a $500 Pell disbursement to account for the lower Pell grant award for less than ½-time students. • For Spring 2024 semester, after testing in SAM, we were able to disburse the early disbursements based on the current enrollment before Census which lowered the overpayment amount significantly. • We understand students add/drop courses through the first two weeks of the semester. The final Pell grant award for the semester is adjusted to the student’s enrollment status on Census day. Students who are ½-time or higher at Census will not be a Pell overpayment for the semester since their Pell grant award will be at 50% or higher. • For students who were enrolled at ½-time or higher at the time the early disbursement was processed, but then dropped to less than ½-time or withdrew completely by Census day, they will be considered a Pell overpayment. o These types of overpayments are unavoidable. o Example: Currently, if a student is scheduled a $500 disbursement for the early 25% disbursement, and is enrolled ½ time, they will receive $500. With the change to actual enrollment (1/2 time for this case), the student will receive $250 instead of $500. If the student drops below 1/2-time or withdraws completely by census, the highest overpayment amount will be $250 instead of $500.
2024-006: PROVISIONS OF THE DAVIS-BACON ACT Program: Education Stabilization Fund Federal Assistance Listing Number: 84.425U Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Agency: Arizona Department of Education Grantor Number: 21FESIII-111217-01A Questioned Costs: $-0- Type of Finding: Noncompliance (Other Matter), significant deficiency in internal control Compliance Requirement: N. Special Tests and Provisions Condition/Context: During our testing of two of 2 contractors, we noted the District did not have adequate internal controls designed to ensure contractors were in compliance with applicable Davis-Bacon Wage Rate requirements. The District did not retain documentation supporting indication of certified payrolls being submitted in accordance with monitoring compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act requirements for contracts funded by the Education Stabilization Fund. Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Davis-Bacon Act requires that laborers and mechanics employes by contractors and subcontractors in the performance of federally funded or assisted contracts in excess of $2,000 for construction, alteration, or repair (including painting and decorating) of public buildings or public works must be paid wages not less than those established by the Secretary of Labor. Adequate monitoring of compliance with these wage requirements is required to ensure that workers are being paid correctly per 29 CFR 5.5 compliance provisions. Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control-Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Cause: The District’s procedures and internal controls over monitoring Davis-Bacon Act compliance were not sufficiently designed or implemented to ensure that wage determinations were verified and that contractors were monitored for compliance. Effect: Noncompliance and internal control weakness. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the District implement policies and procedures to ensure effective monitoring of compliance with Davis-Bacon wage requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: The District concurs with this recommendation and will review its procedures over capital asset and property control.
FINDING 2024-003 Subject: Emergency Connectivity Fund Program - Equipment and Real Property Management, Special Tests and Provisions - Restricted Purpose Federal Agency: Federal Communications Commission Federal Program: Emergency Connectivity Fund Program Assistance Listings Number: 32.009 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): FY 2022 Compliance Requirements: Equipment and Real Property Management, Special Tests and Provisions - Restricted Purpose Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. The School Corporation purchased iPads and Wi-Fi hotspots during the audit period with Emergency Connectivity Fund Program grant monies to meet the remote learning needs of students or staff who would otherwise lack access to connected devices and or broadband connections sufficient to engage in remote learning. The School Corporation had established an internal control over the distribution of iPads but did not establish an internal control over the distribution of Wi-Fi hotspots. The School Corporation was unable to provide a listing of all students or staff who were provided with Wi-Fi hotspots or an inventory record of all Wi-Fi hotspots distributed to students. Additionally, the School Corporation did not maintain appropriate inventory records over the Wi-Fi hotspots. The School Corporation could not verify that they were only reimbursed for no more than one Wi-Fi hotspot per student or school staff member. The total noncompliance was limited to Wi-Fi hotspot expenditures of $105,640. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance for Wi-Fi hotspots was systemic issues throughout the audit period. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 NEW PRAIRIE UNITED SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.313(d) states in part: ". . . (1) Property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property (including the FAIN), who holds title, the acquisition date, and cost of the property, percentage of Federal participation in the project costs for the Federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sale price of the property. (2) A physical inventory of the property must be taken and the results reconciled with the property records at least once every two years. (3) A control system must be developed to ensure adequate safeguards to prevent loss, damage, or theft of the property. Any loss, damage, or theft must be investigated. (4) Adequate maintenance procedures must be developed to keep the property in good condition. . . ." 47 CFR 54.1706(c) states: "Emergency Connectivity Fund support for eligible equipment and services is limited to no more than one fixed broadband internet access connection per location, and one connected device and one Wi-Fi hotspot device per student, school staff member, or library patron. For purposes of the per-location limitation imposed on fixed broadband internet access services in this paragraph (c), each unit in a multi-tenant environment is a separate location for purposes of this paragraph (c)." Cause The service provider had a record of the Wi-Fi hotspots; however, the hotspots were not identifiable by student. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system for Wi-Fi hotspots enabled noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement for the Equipment and Real Property Management and the Special Tests and Provisions - Restricted Purpose compliance requirements could result in the repayment of federal funds INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 NEW PRAIRIE UNITED SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls, including segregation of duties, related to the grant agreement and compliance requirements for the Equipment and Real Property Management and the Special Test and Provisions - Restricted Purpose. An internal control system, including segregation of duties, should be designed and operate effectively to provide reasonable assurance that material noncompliance with the grant agreement or a compliance requirement of a federal program will be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-004 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States Assistance Listings Number: 84.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): 22611-053-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Significant Deficiency, Other Matters Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-003. Condition and Context The School Corporation is a member of the South La Porte County Special Education (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2022-2023, the Cooperative operated the special education program and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for nonpublic school students with disabilities was met for each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure nonpublic school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 NEW PRAIRIE UNITED SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Due to the timing of the Cooperative's corrective action, the nonpublic expenditures spent did not meet the earmarking requirements for the grant award number 22611-053-PN01. From the beginning of the grant awards until March 2023, total grant expenditures were posted as expended. The nonpublic proportionate share expenditures were determined by applying a percentage to the nonpublic school budgeted expenditures. Beginning in March 2023, the Cooperative began tracking expenditures by member school for the nonpublic services. As such, we were unable to identify if the minimum amount per the grant award was expended and properly reported to the IDOE from the beginning of the grant awards through March 2023, as required. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was isolated to the 22611-053-PN01 grant award. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause Through management inquiry, they were unaware of the requirements to track nonpublic proportionate share expenditures directly for each member school. While the Cooperative did implement new processes and procedures to ensure expenditures were tracked by member schools starting in March 2023, most of the grant award had been allocated to the member schools based on a percentage of the budget. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 23 NEW PRAIRIE UNITED SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the Cooperative was unable to track expenditures for nonpublic services for each member school. Consequently, the amounts requested for reimbursement were not supported by actual expenditures, but rather a percentage based on the budget per member school. Because of this, expenditures were not accurately reported to the oversight agency. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation Management of the Cooperative should develop written policies and procedures which would require tracking of actual nonpublic proportionate share expenditures by member schools. Documentation should be maintained to show how these expenditures are being tracked to ensure compliance with the earmarking requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-004 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States Assistance Listings Number: 84.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): 22611-053-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Significant Deficiency, Other Matters Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-003. Condition and Context The School Corporation is a member of the South La Porte County Special Education (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2022-2023, the Cooperative operated the special education program and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for nonpublic school students with disabilities was met for each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure nonpublic school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 NEW PRAIRIE UNITED SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Due to the timing of the Cooperative's corrective action, the nonpublic expenditures spent did not meet the earmarking requirements for the grant award number 22611-053-PN01. From the beginning of the grant awards until March 2023, total grant expenditures were posted as expended. The nonpublic proportionate share expenditures were determined by applying a percentage to the nonpublic school budgeted expenditures. Beginning in March 2023, the Cooperative began tracking expenditures by member school for the nonpublic services. As such, we were unable to identify if the minimum amount per the grant award was expended and properly reported to the IDOE from the beginning of the grant awards through March 2023, as required. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was isolated to the 22611-053-PN01 grant award. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause Through management inquiry, they were unaware of the requirements to track nonpublic proportionate share expenditures directly for each member school. While the Cooperative did implement new processes and procedures to ensure expenditures were tracked by member schools starting in March 2023, most of the grant award had been allocated to the member schools based on a percentage of the budget. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 23 NEW PRAIRIE UNITED SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the Cooperative was unable to track expenditures for nonpublic services for each member school. Consequently, the amounts requested for reimbursement were not supported by actual expenditures, but rather a percentage based on the budget per member school. Because of this, expenditures were not accurately reported to the oversight agency. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation Management of the Cooperative should develop written policies and procedures which would require tracking of actual nonpublic proportionate share expenditures by member schools. Documentation should be maintained to show how these expenditures are being tracked to ensure compliance with the earmarking requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-005 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States Assistance Listings Number: 84.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-053-PN01; 22611-053-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The School Corporation is a member of the South La Porte County Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). The Cooperative operated the special education program and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. Procurement - Small Purchase When the value of the procurement for property or services is within the small purchase threshold, or a lower threshold established by a nonfederal entity, quotes and a contract are required. The small purchase threshold is between $10,000 and $150,000; however, the threshold between $10,000 and $50,000 require quotes from an adequate number of qualified sources. Indiana Code 5-22-8 has more restrictive requirements for the small purchase threshold between $50,000 and $150,000, which require three quotes and a contract to be awarded. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 24 NEW PRAIRIE UNITED SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) In fiscal year 2022-2023, the Cooperative had five vendors which fell within the small purchase threshold and all five vendors were tested. The Cooperative did not obtain quotes or competitive proposals, nor was a circumstance met that would have allowed for a noncompetitive procurement for the purchases. The total amount spent with all five vendors was $292,806. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was isolated to 2022-2023. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAM exclusions, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Six vendors paid from the grant funds were identified as being covered transactions during the audit period. Three vendors each fiscal year provided goods or services which equaled or exceeded $25,000 and were selected for testing. The total amount spent on covered transactions was $266,063 and $142,639 for 2022-2023 and 2023-2024, respectively. For all six vendors, the Cooperative did not verify the vendors' suspension and debarment status prior to payment. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was isolated to the 22611-053-PN01 and 22611-053-ARP grant awards. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 25 (2) Small purchases— (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM.gov Exclusions, or (b) Collecting a certification from that person, or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause The Cooperative noted they were unaware of the procurement requirements of expenditures within the small purchase threshold and for suspension and debarment. They stated they have used the same vendors to provide professional services for several years but only recently started using federal grant award funds for the services. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the Cooperative cannot ensure the vendors paid with federal award funds are procured using the required methods and are not suspended or debarred from receiving federal funds. Without following the required methods for procurement and suspension and debarment, the Cooperative could be overpaying for services or could be paying vendors who are precluded from receiving federal funds. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation Management of the Cooperative should develop written policies and procedures which would require that appropriate procurement methods are used for vendors that are within the small purchase threshold and to ensure vendors are not suspended or debarred. Appropriate documentation should be maintained to ensure compliance with procurement and suspension and debarment. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-005 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States Assistance Listings Number: 84.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-053-PN01; 22611-053-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The School Corporation is a member of the South La Porte County Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). The Cooperative operated the special education program and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. Procurement - Small Purchase When the value of the procurement for property or services is within the small purchase threshold, or a lower threshold established by a nonfederal entity, quotes and a contract are required. The small purchase threshold is between $10,000 and $150,000; however, the threshold between $10,000 and $50,000 require quotes from an adequate number of qualified sources. Indiana Code 5-22-8 has more restrictive requirements for the small purchase threshold between $50,000 and $150,000, which require three quotes and a contract to be awarded. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 24 NEW PRAIRIE UNITED SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) In fiscal year 2022-2023, the Cooperative had five vendors which fell within the small purchase threshold and all five vendors were tested. The Cooperative did not obtain quotes or competitive proposals, nor was a circumstance met that would have allowed for a noncompetitive procurement for the purchases. The total amount spent with all five vendors was $292,806. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was isolated to 2022-2023. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAM exclusions, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Six vendors paid from the grant funds were identified as being covered transactions during the audit period. Three vendors each fiscal year provided goods or services which equaled or exceeded $25,000 and were selected for testing. The total amount spent on covered transactions was $266,063 and $142,639 for 2022-2023 and 2023-2024, respectively. For all six vendors, the Cooperative did not verify the vendors' suspension and debarment status prior to payment. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was isolated to the 22611-053-PN01 and 22611-053-ARP grant awards. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 25 (2) Small purchases— (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM.gov Exclusions, or (b) Collecting a certification from that person, or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause The Cooperative noted they were unaware of the procurement requirements of expenditures within the small purchase threshold and for suspension and debarment. They stated they have used the same vendors to provide professional services for several years but only recently started using federal grant award funds for the services. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the Cooperative cannot ensure the vendors paid with federal award funds are procured using the required methods and are not suspended or debarred from receiving federal funds. Without following the required methods for procurement and suspension and debarment, the Cooperative could be overpaying for services or could be paying vendors who are precluded from receiving federal funds. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation Management of the Cooperative should develop written policies and procedures which would require that appropriate procurement methods are used for vendors that are within the small purchase threshold and to ensure vendors are not suspended or debarred. Appropriate documentation should be maintained to ensure compliance with procurement and suspension and debarment. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-005 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States Assistance Listings Number: 84.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-053-PN01; 22611-053-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The School Corporation is a member of the South La Porte County Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). The Cooperative operated the special education program and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. Procurement - Small Purchase When the value of the procurement for property or services is within the small purchase threshold, or a lower threshold established by a nonfederal entity, quotes and a contract are required. The small purchase threshold is between $10,000 and $150,000; however, the threshold between $10,000 and $50,000 require quotes from an adequate number of qualified sources. Indiana Code 5-22-8 has more restrictive requirements for the small purchase threshold between $50,000 and $150,000, which require three quotes and a contract to be awarded. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 24 NEW PRAIRIE UNITED SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) In fiscal year 2022-2023, the Cooperative had five vendors which fell within the small purchase threshold and all five vendors were tested. The Cooperative did not obtain quotes or competitive proposals, nor was a circumstance met that would have allowed for a noncompetitive procurement for the purchases. The total amount spent with all five vendors was $292,806. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was isolated to 2022-2023. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAM exclusions, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Six vendors paid from the grant funds were identified as being covered transactions during the audit period. Three vendors each fiscal year provided goods or services which equaled or exceeded $25,000 and were selected for testing. The total amount spent on covered transactions was $266,063 and $142,639 for 2022-2023 and 2023-2024, respectively. For all six vendors, the Cooperative did not verify the vendors' suspension and debarment status prior to payment. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was isolated to the 22611-053-PN01 and 22611-053-ARP grant awards. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 25 (2) Small purchases— (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM.gov Exclusions, or (b) Collecting a certification from that person, or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause The Cooperative noted they were unaware of the procurement requirements of expenditures within the small purchase threshold and for suspension and debarment. They stated they have used the same vendors to provide professional services for several years but only recently started using federal grant award funds for the services. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the Cooperative cannot ensure the vendors paid with federal award funds are procured using the required methods and are not suspended or debarred from receiving federal funds. Without following the required methods for procurement and suspension and debarment, the Cooperative could be overpaying for services or could be paying vendors who are precluded from receiving federal funds. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation Management of the Cooperative should develop written policies and procedures which would require that appropriate procurement methods are used for vendors that are within the small purchase threshold and to ensure vendors are not suspended or debarred. Appropriate documentation should be maintained to ensure compliance with procurement and suspension and debarment. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-005 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States Assistance Listings Number: 84.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-053-PN01; 22611-053-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The School Corporation is a member of the South La Porte County Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). The Cooperative operated the special education program and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. Procurement - Small Purchase When the value of the procurement for property or services is within the small purchase threshold, or a lower threshold established by a nonfederal entity, quotes and a contract are required. The small purchase threshold is between $10,000 and $150,000; however, the threshold between $10,000 and $50,000 require quotes from an adequate number of qualified sources. Indiana Code 5-22-8 has more restrictive requirements for the small purchase threshold between $50,000 and $150,000, which require three quotes and a contract to be awarded. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 24 NEW PRAIRIE UNITED SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) In fiscal year 2022-2023, the Cooperative had five vendors which fell within the small purchase threshold and all five vendors were tested. The Cooperative did not obtain quotes or competitive proposals, nor was a circumstance met that would have allowed for a noncompetitive procurement for the purchases. The total amount spent with all five vendors was $292,806. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was isolated to 2022-2023. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAM exclusions, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Six vendors paid from the grant funds were identified as being covered transactions during the audit period. Three vendors each fiscal year provided goods or services which equaled or exceeded $25,000 and were selected for testing. The total amount spent on covered transactions was $266,063 and $142,639 for 2022-2023 and 2023-2024, respectively. For all six vendors, the Cooperative did not verify the vendors' suspension and debarment status prior to payment. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was isolated to the 22611-053-PN01 and 22611-053-ARP grant awards. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 25 (2) Small purchases— (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM.gov Exclusions, or (b) Collecting a certification from that person, or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause The Cooperative noted they were unaware of the procurement requirements of expenditures within the small purchase threshold and for suspension and debarment. They stated they have used the same vendors to provide professional services for several years but only recently started using federal grant award funds for the services. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the Cooperative cannot ensure the vendors paid with federal award funds are procured using the required methods and are not suspended or debarred from receiving federal funds. Without following the required methods for procurement and suspension and debarment, the Cooperative could be overpaying for services or could be paying vendors who are precluded from receiving federal funds. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation Management of the Cooperative should develop written policies and procedures which would require that appropriate procurement methods are used for vendors that are within the small purchase threshold and to ensure vendors are not suspended or debarred. Appropriate documentation should be maintained to ensure compliance with procurement and suspension and debarment. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-006 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Equipment and Real Property Management Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Equipment and Real Property Management Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The School Corporation had not properly designed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Equipment and Real Property Management compliance requirement. A property record or capital asset listing is required to be maintained for all equipment, property improvements, and property purchased with the COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund (ESF) grant awards to ensure adequate safeguards are in place to prevent loss or damage of items. The School Corporation hired a consultant to compile and provide a fixed asset report that contained all inventory and assets purchased that exceeded the School Corporation's capitalization threshold. The consultant prepared the report; however, the School Corporation did not have any policies or procedures in place to review the asset listing to ensure the listing was complete. The School Corporation's capital asset listing did not include all the required asset information for assets purchased with federal awards. The following information for each asset was not included in the School Corporations capital asset listing: the source of funding for the property (including the federal award identification number (FAIN)), and percentage of federal participation in the project costs for the federal award under which the property was acquired. In addition, assets were not properly safeguarded and maintained. During the audit period, the School Corporation purchased assets and completed improvement projects totaling $1,794,965 with ESF funds. These assets were not included on the asset listing or physical inventory prepared by the consultant. Additionally, the School Corporation was unable to provide a listing of capital asset deletions during the audit period. Therefore, we could not determine if the disposition of any equipment or real property acquired under federal awards was properly reflected in the property records. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 27 NEW PRAIRIE UNITED SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.313(d) states in part: ". . . (1) Property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property (including the FAIN), who holds title, the acquisition date, and cost of the property, percentage of Federal participation in the project costs for the Federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sale price of the property. (2) A physical inventory of the property must be taken and the results reconciled with the property records at least once every two years. (3) A control system must be developed to ensure adequate safeguards to prevent loss, damage, or theft of the property. Any loss, damage, or theft must be investigated. (4) Adequate maintenance procedures must be developed to keep the property in good condition. . . ." 2 CFR 200.313(e) states in part: "When original or replacement equipment acquired under a Federal award is no longer needed for the original project or program or for other activities currently or previously supported by a Federal awarding agency, except as otherwise provided in Federal statutes, regulations, or Federal awarding agency disposition instructions, the non-Federal entity must request disposition instructions from the Federal awarding agency if required by the terms and conditions of the Federal award. . . ." Cause The School Corporation did not develop a system of internal controls to ensure that all items over the capital asset threshold were added to the listing, the capital asset listing included all required information, and that items purchased were properly maintained and safeguarded. Effect Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the repayment of federal funds. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 28 NEW PRAIRIE UNITED SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure asset records include all the necessary information, new assets are properly added, disposals are properly documented, and any discrepancies are reconciled. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-006 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Equipment and Real Property Management Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Equipment and Real Property Management Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The School Corporation had not properly designed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Equipment and Real Property Management compliance requirement. A property record or capital asset listing is required to be maintained for all equipment, property improvements, and property purchased with the COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund (ESF) grant awards to ensure adequate safeguards are in place to prevent loss or damage of items. The School Corporation hired a consultant to compile and provide a fixed asset report that contained all inventory and assets purchased that exceeded the School Corporation's capitalization threshold. The consultant prepared the report; however, the School Corporation did not have any policies or procedures in place to review the asset listing to ensure the listing was complete. The School Corporation's capital asset listing did not include all the required asset information for assets purchased with federal awards. The following information for each asset was not included in the School Corporations capital asset listing: the source of funding for the property (including the federal award identification number (FAIN)), and percentage of federal participation in the project costs for the federal award under which the property was acquired. In addition, assets were not properly safeguarded and maintained. During the audit period, the School Corporation purchased assets and completed improvement projects totaling $1,794,965 with ESF funds. These assets were not included on the asset listing or physical inventory prepared by the consultant. Additionally, the School Corporation was unable to provide a listing of capital asset deletions during the audit period. Therefore, we could not determine if the disposition of any equipment or real property acquired under federal awards was properly reflected in the property records. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 27 NEW PRAIRIE UNITED SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.313(d) states in part: ". . . (1) Property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property (including the FAIN), who holds title, the acquisition date, and cost of the property, percentage of Federal participation in the project costs for the Federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sale price of the property. (2) A physical inventory of the property must be taken and the results reconciled with the property records at least once every two years. (3) A control system must be developed to ensure adequate safeguards to prevent loss, damage, or theft of the property. Any loss, damage, or theft must be investigated. (4) Adequate maintenance procedures must be developed to keep the property in good condition. . . ." 2 CFR 200.313(e) states in part: "When original or replacement equipment acquired under a Federal award is no longer needed for the original project or program or for other activities currently or previously supported by a Federal awarding agency, except as otherwise provided in Federal statutes, regulations, or Federal awarding agency disposition instructions, the non-Federal entity must request disposition instructions from the Federal awarding agency if required by the terms and conditions of the Federal award. . . ." Cause The School Corporation did not develop a system of internal controls to ensure that all items over the capital asset threshold were added to the listing, the capital asset listing included all required information, and that items purchased were properly maintained and safeguarded. Effect Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the repayment of federal funds. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 28 NEW PRAIRIE UNITED SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure asset records include all the necessary information, new assets are properly added, disposals are properly documented, and any discrepancies are reconciled. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-006 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Equipment and Real Property Management Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Equipment and Real Property Management Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The School Corporation had not properly designed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Equipment and Real Property Management compliance requirement. A property record or capital asset listing is required to be maintained for all equipment, property improvements, and property purchased with the COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund (ESF) grant awards to ensure adequate safeguards are in place to prevent loss or damage of items. The School Corporation hired a consultant to compile and provide a fixed asset report that contained all inventory and assets purchased that exceeded the School Corporation's capitalization threshold. The consultant prepared the report; however, the School Corporation did not have any policies or procedures in place to review the asset listing to ensure the listing was complete. The School Corporation's capital asset listing did not include all the required asset information for assets purchased with federal awards. The following information for each asset was not included in the School Corporations capital asset listing: the source of funding for the property (including the federal award identification number (FAIN)), and percentage of federal participation in the project costs for the federal award under which the property was acquired. In addition, assets were not properly safeguarded and maintained. During the audit period, the School Corporation purchased assets and completed improvement projects totaling $1,794,965 with ESF funds. These assets were not included on the asset listing or physical inventory prepared by the consultant. Additionally, the School Corporation was unable to provide a listing of capital asset deletions during the audit period. Therefore, we could not determine if the disposition of any equipment or real property acquired under federal awards was properly reflected in the property records. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 27 NEW PRAIRIE UNITED SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.313(d) states in part: ". . . (1) Property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property (including the FAIN), who holds title, the acquisition date, and cost of the property, percentage of Federal participation in the project costs for the Federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sale price of the property. (2) A physical inventory of the property must be taken and the results reconciled with the property records at least once every two years. (3) A control system must be developed to ensure adequate safeguards to prevent loss, damage, or theft of the property. Any loss, damage, or theft must be investigated. (4) Adequate maintenance procedures must be developed to keep the property in good condition. . . ." 2 CFR 200.313(e) states in part: "When original or replacement equipment acquired under a Federal award is no longer needed for the original project or program or for other activities currently or previously supported by a Federal awarding agency, except as otherwise provided in Federal statutes, regulations, or Federal awarding agency disposition instructions, the non-Federal entity must request disposition instructions from the Federal awarding agency if required by the terms and conditions of the Federal award. . . ." Cause The School Corporation did not develop a system of internal controls to ensure that all items over the capital asset threshold were added to the listing, the capital asset listing included all required information, and that items purchased were properly maintained and safeguarded. Effect Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the repayment of federal funds. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 28 NEW PRAIRIE UNITED SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure asset records include all the necessary information, new assets are properly added, disposals are properly documented, and any discrepancies are reconciled. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-006 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Equipment and Real Property Management Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Equipment and Real Property Management Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The School Corporation had not properly designed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Equipment and Real Property Management compliance requirement. A property record or capital asset listing is required to be maintained for all equipment, property improvements, and property purchased with the COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund (ESF) grant awards to ensure adequate safeguards are in place to prevent loss or damage of items. The School Corporation hired a consultant to compile and provide a fixed asset report that contained all inventory and assets purchased that exceeded the School Corporation's capitalization threshold. The consultant prepared the report; however, the School Corporation did not have any policies or procedures in place to review the asset listing to ensure the listing was complete. The School Corporation's capital asset listing did not include all the required asset information for assets purchased with federal awards. The following information for each asset was not included in the School Corporations capital asset listing: the source of funding for the property (including the federal award identification number (FAIN)), and percentage of federal participation in the project costs for the federal award under which the property was acquired. In addition, assets were not properly safeguarded and maintained. During the audit period, the School Corporation purchased assets and completed improvement projects totaling $1,794,965 with ESF funds. These assets were not included on the asset listing or physical inventory prepared by the consultant. Additionally, the School Corporation was unable to provide a listing of capital asset deletions during the audit period. Therefore, we could not determine if the disposition of any equipment or real property acquired under federal awards was properly reflected in the property records. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 27 NEW PRAIRIE UNITED SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.313(d) states in part: ". . . (1) Property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property (including the FAIN), who holds title, the acquisition date, and cost of the property, percentage of Federal participation in the project costs for the Federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sale price of the property. (2) A physical inventory of the property must be taken and the results reconciled with the property records at least once every two years. (3) A control system must be developed to ensure adequate safeguards to prevent loss, damage, or theft of the property. Any loss, damage, or theft must be investigated. (4) Adequate maintenance procedures must be developed to keep the property in good condition. . . ." 2 CFR 200.313(e) states in part: "When original or replacement equipment acquired under a Federal award is no longer needed for the original project or program or for other activities currently or previously supported by a Federal awarding agency, except as otherwise provided in Federal statutes, regulations, or Federal awarding agency disposition instructions, the non-Federal entity must request disposition instructions from the Federal awarding agency if required by the terms and conditions of the Federal award. . . ." Cause The School Corporation did not develop a system of internal controls to ensure that all items over the capital asset threshold were added to the listing, the capital asset listing included all required information, and that items purchased were properly maintained and safeguarded. Effect Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the repayment of federal funds. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 28 NEW PRAIRIE UNITED SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure asset records include all the necessary information, new assets are properly added, disposals are properly documented, and any discrepancies are reconciled. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-007 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D200013, S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Material Weakness Condition and Context The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. The School Corporation was required to submit annual data reports to the Indiana Department of Education via JotForm, a form/report builder. Data to be submitted included, but was not limited to, current period expenditures, prior period expenditures, and expenditures per activity. During the audit period, the School Corporation submitted one ESSER I report, two ESSER II reports, and two ESSER III reports, for a total of five reports. The School Corporation did not have a documented review of any of the annual reports submitted to the Indiana Department of Education. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 29 NEW PRAIRIE UNITED SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Cause A proper system of internal controls was designed but not implemented properly by management of the School Corporation. A review process for the ESF reports was in place, but no documentation of the review was available to show amounts reported were reviewed prior to submission. Effect The failure to implement a system of internal controls places the School Corporation at risk of inaccurate reporting. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure that all reports are submitted accurately. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-007 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D200013, S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Material Weakness Condition and Context The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. The School Corporation was required to submit annual data reports to the Indiana Department of Education via JotForm, a form/report builder. Data to be submitted included, but was not limited to, current period expenditures, prior period expenditures, and expenditures per activity. During the audit period, the School Corporation submitted one ESSER I report, two ESSER II reports, and two ESSER III reports, for a total of five reports. The School Corporation did not have a documented review of any of the annual reports submitted to the Indiana Department of Education. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 29 NEW PRAIRIE UNITED SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Cause A proper system of internal controls was designed but not implemented properly by management of the School Corporation. A review process for the ESF reports was in place, but no documentation of the review was available to show amounts reported were reviewed prior to submission. Effect The failure to implement a system of internal controls places the School Corporation at risk of inaccurate reporting. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure that all reports are submitted accurately. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-007 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D200013, S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Material Weakness Condition and Context The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. The School Corporation was required to submit annual data reports to the Indiana Department of Education via JotForm, a form/report builder. Data to be submitted included, but was not limited to, current period expenditures, prior period expenditures, and expenditures per activity. During the audit period, the School Corporation submitted one ESSER I report, two ESSER II reports, and two ESSER III reports, for a total of five reports. The School Corporation did not have a documented review of any of the annual reports submitted to the Indiana Department of Education. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 29 NEW PRAIRIE UNITED SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Cause A proper system of internal controls was designed but not implemented properly by management of the School Corporation. A review process for the ESF reports was in place, but no documentation of the review was available to show amounts reported were reviewed prior to submission. Effect The failure to implement a system of internal controls places the School Corporation at risk of inaccurate reporting. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure that all reports are submitted accurately. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-007 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D200013, S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Material Weakness Condition and Context The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. The School Corporation was required to submit annual data reports to the Indiana Department of Education via JotForm, a form/report builder. Data to be submitted included, but was not limited to, current period expenditures, prior period expenditures, and expenditures per activity. During the audit period, the School Corporation submitted one ESSER I report, two ESSER II reports, and two ESSER III reports, for a total of five reports. The School Corporation did not have a documented review of any of the annual reports submitted to the Indiana Department of Education. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 29 NEW PRAIRIE UNITED SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Cause A proper system of internal controls was designed but not implemented properly by management of the School Corporation. A review process for the ESF reports was in place, but no documentation of the review was available to show amounts reported were reviewed prior to submission. Effect The failure to implement a system of internal controls places the School Corporation at risk of inaccurate reporting. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure that all reports are submitted accurately. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-007 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D200013, S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Material Weakness Condition and Context The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. The School Corporation was required to submit annual data reports to the Indiana Department of Education via JotForm, a form/report builder. Data to be submitted included, but was not limited to, current period expenditures, prior period expenditures, and expenditures per activity. During the audit period, the School Corporation submitted one ESSER I report, two ESSER II reports, and two ESSER III reports, for a total of five reports. The School Corporation did not have a documented review of any of the annual reports submitted to the Indiana Department of Education. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 29 NEW PRAIRIE UNITED SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Cause A proper system of internal controls was designed but not implemented properly by management of the School Corporation. A review process for the ESF reports was in place, but no documentation of the review was available to show amounts reported were reviewed prior to submission. Effect The failure to implement a system of internal controls places the School Corporation at risk of inaccurate reporting. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure that all reports are submitted accurately. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-008 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Special Test and Provision - Wage Rate Requirements Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Special Test and Provision - Wage Rate Requirements Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not designed or implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements compliance requirement. Construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must pay wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor (DOL) to their laborers and mechanics. Nonfederal entities are to include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with these requirements and the DOL regulations. This would include a requirement to submit a copy of the payroll and statement of compliance to the entity for each week in which contract work was performed. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 30 NEW PRAIRIE UNITED SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) The School Corporation did not have adequate policies or procedures to ensure that all construction contracts in excess of $2,000 paid from federal grant funds included a prevailing wage rate clause. One construction contract was paid from the COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund grant funds, totaling $1,278,001, during the audit period. This construction contract was subject to the wage rate requirements; however, the contract did not have the required prevailing wage rate clause included in the contract, nor were certified payrolls submitted by the contractor timely. The lack of internal controls and failure to maintain and provide adequate supporting documentation were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 29 CFR 5.5 states in part: "(a) Required contract clauses. The Agency head will cause or require the contracting officer to require the contracting officer to insert in full, or (for contracts covered by the Federal Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR chapter 1)) by reference, in any contract in excess of $2,000 which is entered into for the actual construction, alteration and/or repair, including painting and decorating, of a public building or public work, or building or work financed in whole or in part from Federal funds or in accordance with guarantees of a Federal agency or financed from funds obtained by pledge of any contract of a Federal agency to make a loan, grant or annual contribution (except where a different meaning is expressly indicated), and which is subject to the labor standards provisions of any of the laws referenced by § 5.1, the following clauses . . . (1) Minimum wages— (i) Wage rates and fringe benefits. All laborers and mechanics employed or working upon the site of the work (or otherwise working in construction or development of the project under a development statute), will be paid unconditionally and not less often than once a week, and without subsequent deduction or rebate on any account (except such payroll deductions as are permitted by regulations issued by the Secretary of Labor under the Copeland Act (29 CFR part 3)), the full amount of basic hourly wages and bona fide fringe benefits (or cash equivalents thereof) due at time of payment computed at rates not less than those contained in the wage determination of the Secretary of Labor which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, regardless of any contractual relationship which may be alleged to exist between the contractor and such laborers and mechanics. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 31 NEW PRAIRIE UNITED SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200 Appendix II states in part: "In addition to other provisions required by the Federal agency or non-Federal entity; all contracts made by the non-Federal entity under the Federal award must contain provisions covering the following, as applicable. . . . (D) Davis-Bacon Act, as amended (40 U.S.C. 3141-3148). When required by Federal program legislation, all prime construction contracts in excess of $2,000 awarded by non-Federal entities must include a provision for compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 3141-3144, and 3146-3148) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5, 'Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Covering Federally Financed and Assisted Construction'). In accordance with the statute, contractors must be required to pay wages to laborers and mechanics at a rate not less than the prevailing wages specified in a wage determination made by the Secretary of Labor. In addition, contractors must be required to pay wages not less than once a week. . . ." 29 CFR 5.5 (a)(3)(ii)(A) states in part: ". . . The contractor or subcontractor must submit weekly for each week in which any DBA- or Related Acts-covered work is performed, certified payrolls to the (write in name of appropriate federal agency) if the agency is a party to the contract, but if the agency is not such a party, the contractor will submit the payrolls to the applicant, sponsor, or owner, or other entity, as the case may be, for transmission to the (write in name of agency). . . ." Cause The School Corporation had not established a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance or that the required clause was included in the contracts for the Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements compliance requirement. Also, the School Corporation was unaware of the requirement to collect weekly certified payrolls. Effect The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls over the Special Test and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirement resulted in one contract not meeting the guidelines established. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommend that the School Corporation's management establish internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report. INDIANA STATE
FINDING 2024-008 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Special Test and Provision - Wage Rate Requirements Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Special Test and Provision - Wage Rate Requirements Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not designed or implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements compliance requirement. Construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must pay wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor (DOL) to their laborers and mechanics. Nonfederal entities are to include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with these requirements and the DOL regulations. This would include a requirement to submit a copy of the payroll and statement of compliance to the entity for each week in which contract work was performed. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 30 NEW PRAIRIE UNITED SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) The School Corporation did not have adequate policies or procedures to ensure that all construction contracts in excess of $2,000 paid from federal grant funds included a prevailing wage rate clause. One construction contract was paid from the COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund grant funds, totaling $1,278,001, during the audit period. This construction contract was subject to the wage rate requirements; however, the contract did not have the required prevailing wage rate clause included in the contract, nor were certified payrolls submitted by the contractor timely. The lack of internal controls and failure to maintain and provide adequate supporting documentation were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 29 CFR 5.5 states in part: "(a) Required contract clauses. The Agency head will cause or require the contracting officer to require the contracting officer to insert in full, or (for contracts covered by the Federal Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR chapter 1)) by reference, in any contract in excess of $2,000 which is entered into for the actual construction, alteration and/or repair, including painting and decorating, of a public building or public work, or building or work financed in whole or in part from Federal funds or in accordance with guarantees of a Federal agency or financed from funds obtained by pledge of any contract of a Federal agency to make a loan, grant or annual contribution (except where a different meaning is expressly indicated), and which is subject to the labor standards provisions of any of the laws referenced by § 5.1, the following clauses . . . (1) Minimum wages— (i) Wage rates and fringe benefits. All laborers and mechanics employed or working upon the site of the work (or otherwise working in construction or development of the project under a development statute), will be paid unconditionally and not less often than once a week, and without subsequent deduction or rebate on any account (except such payroll deductions as are permitted by regulations issued by the Secretary of Labor under the Copeland Act (29 CFR part 3)), the full amount of basic hourly wages and bona fide fringe benefits (or cash equivalents thereof) due at time of payment computed at rates not less than those contained in the wage determination of the Secretary of Labor which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, regardless of any contractual relationship which may be alleged to exist between the contractor and such laborers and mechanics. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 31 NEW PRAIRIE UNITED SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200 Appendix II states in part: "In addition to other provisions required by the Federal agency or non-Federal entity; all contracts made by the non-Federal entity under the Federal award must contain provisions covering the following, as applicable. . . . (D) Davis-Bacon Act, as amended (40 U.S.C. 3141-3148). When required by Federal program legislation, all prime construction contracts in excess of $2,000 awarded by non-Federal entities must include a provision for compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 3141-3144, and 3146-3148) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5, 'Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Covering Federally Financed and Assisted Construction'). In accordance with the statute, contractors must be required to pay wages to laborers and mechanics at a rate not less than the prevailing wages specified in a wage determination made by the Secretary of Labor. In addition, contractors must be required to pay wages not less than once a week. . . ." 29 CFR 5.5 (a)(3)(ii)(A) states in part: ". . . The contractor or subcontractor must submit weekly for each week in which any DBA- or Related Acts-covered work is performed, certified payrolls to the (write in name of appropriate federal agency) if the agency is a party to the contract, but if the agency is not such a party, the contractor will submit the payrolls to the applicant, sponsor, or owner, or other entity, as the case may be, for transmission to the (write in name of agency). . . ." Cause The School Corporation had not established a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance or that the required clause was included in the contracts for the Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements compliance requirement. Also, the School Corporation was unaware of the requirement to collect weekly certified payrolls. Effect The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls over the Special Test and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirement resulted in one contract not meeting the guidelines established. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommend that the School Corporation's management establish internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report. INDIANA STATE
FINDING 2024-008 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Special Test and Provision - Wage Rate Requirements Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Special Test and Provision - Wage Rate Requirements Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not designed or implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements compliance requirement. Construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must pay wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor (DOL) to their laborers and mechanics. Nonfederal entities are to include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with these requirements and the DOL regulations. This would include a requirement to submit a copy of the payroll and statement of compliance to the entity for each week in which contract work was performed. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 30 NEW PRAIRIE UNITED SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) The School Corporation did not have adequate policies or procedures to ensure that all construction contracts in excess of $2,000 paid from federal grant funds included a prevailing wage rate clause. One construction contract was paid from the COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund grant funds, totaling $1,278,001, during the audit period. This construction contract was subject to the wage rate requirements; however, the contract did not have the required prevailing wage rate clause included in the contract, nor were certified payrolls submitted by the contractor timely. The lack of internal controls and failure to maintain and provide adequate supporting documentation were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 29 CFR 5.5 states in part: "(a) Required contract clauses. The Agency head will cause or require the contracting officer to require the contracting officer to insert in full, or (for contracts covered by the Federal Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR chapter 1)) by reference, in any contract in excess of $2,000 which is entered into for the actual construction, alteration and/or repair, including painting and decorating, of a public building or public work, or building or work financed in whole or in part from Federal funds or in accordance with guarantees of a Federal agency or financed from funds obtained by pledge of any contract of a Federal agency to make a loan, grant or annual contribution (except where a different meaning is expressly indicated), and which is subject to the labor standards provisions of any of the laws referenced by § 5.1, the following clauses . . . (1) Minimum wages— (i) Wage rates and fringe benefits. All laborers and mechanics employed or working upon the site of the work (or otherwise working in construction or development of the project under a development statute), will be paid unconditionally and not less often than once a week, and without subsequent deduction or rebate on any account (except such payroll deductions as are permitted by regulations issued by the Secretary of Labor under the Copeland Act (29 CFR part 3)), the full amount of basic hourly wages and bona fide fringe benefits (or cash equivalents thereof) due at time of payment computed at rates not less than those contained in the wage determination of the Secretary of Labor which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, regardless of any contractual relationship which may be alleged to exist between the contractor and such laborers and mechanics. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 31 NEW PRAIRIE UNITED SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200 Appendix II states in part: "In addition to other provisions required by the Federal agency or non-Federal entity; all contracts made by the non-Federal entity under the Federal award must contain provisions covering the following, as applicable. . . . (D) Davis-Bacon Act, as amended (40 U.S.C. 3141-3148). When required by Federal program legislation, all prime construction contracts in excess of $2,000 awarded by non-Federal entities must include a provision for compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 3141-3144, and 3146-3148) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5, 'Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Covering Federally Financed and Assisted Construction'). In accordance with the statute, contractors must be required to pay wages to laborers and mechanics at a rate not less than the prevailing wages specified in a wage determination made by the Secretary of Labor. In addition, contractors must be required to pay wages not less than once a week. . . ." 29 CFR 5.5 (a)(3)(ii)(A) states in part: ". . . The contractor or subcontractor must submit weekly for each week in which any DBA- or Related Acts-covered work is performed, certified payrolls to the (write in name of appropriate federal agency) if the agency is a party to the contract, but if the agency is not such a party, the contractor will submit the payrolls to the applicant, sponsor, or owner, or other entity, as the case may be, for transmission to the (write in name of agency). . . ." Cause The School Corporation had not established a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance or that the required clause was included in the contracts for the Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements compliance requirement. Also, the School Corporation was unaware of the requirement to collect weekly certified payrolls. Effect The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls over the Special Test and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirement resulted in one contract not meeting the guidelines established. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommend that the School Corporation's management establish internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report. INDIANA STATE
FINDING 2024-008 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Special Test and Provision - Wage Rate Requirements Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Special Test and Provision - Wage Rate Requirements Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not designed or implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements compliance requirement. Construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must pay wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor (DOL) to their laborers and mechanics. Nonfederal entities are to include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with these requirements and the DOL regulations. This would include a requirement to submit a copy of the payroll and statement of compliance to the entity for each week in which contract work was performed. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 30 NEW PRAIRIE UNITED SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) The School Corporation did not have adequate policies or procedures to ensure that all construction contracts in excess of $2,000 paid from federal grant funds included a prevailing wage rate clause. One construction contract was paid from the COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund grant funds, totaling $1,278,001, during the audit period. This construction contract was subject to the wage rate requirements; however, the contract did not have the required prevailing wage rate clause included in the contract, nor were certified payrolls submitted by the contractor timely. The lack of internal controls and failure to maintain and provide adequate supporting documentation were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 29 CFR 5.5 states in part: "(a) Required contract clauses. The Agency head will cause or require the contracting officer to require the contracting officer to insert in full, or (for contracts covered by the Federal Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR chapter 1)) by reference, in any contract in excess of $2,000 which is entered into for the actual construction, alteration and/or repair, including painting and decorating, of a public building or public work, or building or work financed in whole or in part from Federal funds or in accordance with guarantees of a Federal agency or financed from funds obtained by pledge of any contract of a Federal agency to make a loan, grant or annual contribution (except where a different meaning is expressly indicated), and which is subject to the labor standards provisions of any of the laws referenced by § 5.1, the following clauses . . . (1) Minimum wages— (i) Wage rates and fringe benefits. All laborers and mechanics employed or working upon the site of the work (or otherwise working in construction or development of the project under a development statute), will be paid unconditionally and not less often than once a week, and without subsequent deduction or rebate on any account (except such payroll deductions as are permitted by regulations issued by the Secretary of Labor under the Copeland Act (29 CFR part 3)), the full amount of basic hourly wages and bona fide fringe benefits (or cash equivalents thereof) due at time of payment computed at rates not less than those contained in the wage determination of the Secretary of Labor which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, regardless of any contractual relationship which may be alleged to exist between the contractor and such laborers and mechanics. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 31 NEW PRAIRIE UNITED SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200 Appendix II states in part: "In addition to other provisions required by the Federal agency or non-Federal entity; all contracts made by the non-Federal entity under the Federal award must contain provisions covering the following, as applicable. . . . (D) Davis-Bacon Act, as amended (40 U.S.C. 3141-3148). When required by Federal program legislation, all prime construction contracts in excess of $2,000 awarded by non-Federal entities must include a provision for compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 3141-3144, and 3146-3148) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5, 'Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Covering Federally Financed and Assisted Construction'). In accordance with the statute, contractors must be required to pay wages to laborers and mechanics at a rate not less than the prevailing wages specified in a wage determination made by the Secretary of Labor. In addition, contractors must be required to pay wages not less than once a week. . . ." 29 CFR 5.5 (a)(3)(ii)(A) states in part: ". . . The contractor or subcontractor must submit weekly for each week in which any DBA- or Related Acts-covered work is performed, certified payrolls to the (write in name of appropriate federal agency) if the agency is a party to the contract, but if the agency is not such a party, the contractor will submit the payrolls to the applicant, sponsor, or owner, or other entity, as the case may be, for transmission to the (write in name of agency). . . ." Cause The School Corporation had not established a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance or that the required clause was included in the contracts for the Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements compliance requirement. Also, the School Corporation was unaware of the requirement to collect weekly certified payrolls. Effect The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls over the Special Test and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirement resulted in one contract not meeting the guidelines established. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommend that the School Corporation's management establish internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report. INDIANA STATE
Finding 2024-003: Internal Controls over Cash Management Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-Through Grantor: Illinois Department of Human Services Federal Program: Block Grants for Substance Use Prevention, Treatment, and Recovery Services (93.959) and Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services (93.958) Federal Award Year: Year ended June 30, 2024 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200.303(c) requires non-Federal entities to establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Condition: During our testing, we noted that internal controls over the Federal award were not properly designed over the cash management compliance requirement. NCBHS is funded under the reimbursement method, and for reimbursement requests prior to March 2024, we were not able to test internal controls over the review of the requests submitted to the grantor. Cause: NCBHS management stated that cash reimbursement requests were reviewed prior to submission to the grantor, but there was no verifiable evidence that the reviews took place prior to March 2024. Effect: Internal controls over Federal awards that are not properly designed increases the risk of noncompliance with the types of compliance requirements identified as subject to audit in the OMB Compliance Supplement. Questioned Costs: None Context: For program 93.959 we tested 6 cash reimbursement requests and noted one of the requests had no evidence of review. For program 93.958, we tested 4 cash reimbursement requests and noted 3 of the requests had no evidence of review. Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: Starting in March 2024, management implemented internal controls over the maintenance of documentation to provide evidence of controls in place over compliance with the cash management requirement. We recommend that management continue to follow its implemented system of internal controls that began in March 2024 to ensure documentation over cash management procedures and evidence of reviews performed is retained. Views of Responsible Officials: NCBHS agrees with the recommendation.
Finding 2024-003: Internal Controls over Cash Management Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-Through Grantor: Illinois Department of Human Services Federal Program: Block Grants for Substance Use Prevention, Treatment, and Recovery Services (93.959) and Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services (93.958) Federal Award Year: Year ended June 30, 2024 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200.303(c) requires non-Federal entities to establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Condition: During our testing, we noted that internal controls over the Federal award were not properly designed over the cash management compliance requirement. NCBHS is funded under the reimbursement method, and for reimbursement requests prior to March 2024, we were not able to test internal controls over the review of the requests submitted to the grantor. Cause: NCBHS management stated that cash reimbursement requests were reviewed prior to submission to the grantor, but there was no verifiable evidence that the reviews took place prior to March 2024. Effect: Internal controls over Federal awards that are not properly designed increases the risk of noncompliance with the types of compliance requirements identified as subject to audit in the OMB Compliance Supplement. Questioned Costs: None Context: For program 93.959 we tested 6 cash reimbursement requests and noted one of the requests had no evidence of review. For program 93.958, we tested 4 cash reimbursement requests and noted 3 of the requests had no evidence of review. Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: Starting in March 2024, management implemented internal controls over the maintenance of documentation to provide evidence of controls in place over compliance with the cash management requirement. We recommend that management continue to follow its implemented system of internal controls that began in March 2024 to ensure documentation over cash management procedures and evidence of reviews performed is retained. Views of Responsible Officials: NCBHS agrees with the recommendation.
Finding 2024-001: Eligibility-Pell Grant (Significant Deficiency) Federal Program - Federal Pell Grant Program Federal Agency - U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity - Not Applicable ALN - 84.063 Federal Award Year - June 30, 2024 Criteria: The amount of a student's Pell Grant for an academic year is based upon the payment and disbursement schedules published by the Secretary for each award year (34 CFR 690.62) The Code of Federal Regulations (34 CFR 690.80(b)(1)) states if the student's enrollment status changes from one academic term to another within the same award year, the institution shall recalculate the Federal Pell Grant award for the new payment period taking into account any changes in the cost of attendance. Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.303) requires nonfederal entities receiving Federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Effective internal controls should include procedures to ensure students are awarded and disbursed the proper federal fund amounts. Condition/Context: For one student out of 40 tested, the student was selected for, and completed, verification prior to the College disbursing funds for the Fall 2023 term. As a result of that verification, the student's Expected Family Contribution (EFC) decreased and the College received a valid, corrected ISIR. However, the student's award package was not updated as a result of the decreased EFC. The sample was not a statistically valid sample but was determined using Chapter 21 - Audit Sampling Considerations of Uniform Guidance Compliance Audits of the Government Auditing Standards and Single Audit Guide. Cause: A corrected ISIR came in after verification was complete and the review and re-packaging process never occurred. Effect: The student was not awarded the appropriate amount of Federal Pell Grant funds based on the student's lower, corrected EFC. Questioned Costs: $400 Recommendation: We recommend that a step is added to the College's standard verification procedures to ensure that Federal Pell Grant awards are appropriately adjusted for any changes in EFC that are the result of a completed verification. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The College agrees with the finding. A corrected ISIR came in after verification was complete and instead of going through the normal process of being reviewed and repackaged by the director, the student record was accidentally filed away. This happened due to human error. We have a process in place to monitor corrected ISIR transactions to ensure that the EFC (SAI effective for award year 2024-25 and later) agrees with our documentation. The student record is then given to the director for final review and repackaging. We have added an additional step now whereby the Pell Grant administrator also reviews the output report for ISIR imports on a weekly basis.
Finding No.: 2024-001 – Enrollment Reporting Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-through Agency: Direct Program Name: Student Financial Assistance Cluster – Federal Direct Loan Program, Federal Pell Grant Program CFDA Numbers: 84.268, 84.063 Federal Award Year: July 1, 2023 – June 30, 2024 Criteria Institutions are required to report enrollment information under the Pell grant, Direct Loan, and Federal Family Education Loan (FFEL) programs via the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) (OMB No. 1845-0035) (Pell, 34 CFR 690.83(b)(2); Direct Loan, 34 CFR 685.309). The administration of the Title IV programs depends heavily on the accuracy and timeliness of the enrollment reported by institutions. The Department of Education lists several certification methods for enrollment reporting, including certifying directly through the NSLDS web site, certifying through the NSLDS’s batch enrollment reporting process, or through certification of rosters provided to the National Student Clearinghouse (NSC). Per 2 CFR 200.303, a non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the federal award. Condition Found The University generally certifies its enrollment information through rosters provided to the NSC. Of the 60 students with enrollment changes that we selected for test work, we identified two (2) students whose changes in enrollment status were not timely transmitted to NSLDS, as follows: • For one (1) student, the University was notified of the student’s enrollment status change from full-time to “Withdrew” in May 2024. Accordingly, the student’s’ status change should have been transmitted within 60 days of that date. However, submission was not timely as the final submission of change of status was sixty-seven (67) days after the required submission date. • For one (1) student, the University placed the student on academic suspension on June 3, 2024. Accordingly, the students’ status change should have been transmitted within 60 days of that date. However, submission was not timely as the final submission of change of status was fifty (50) days after the required submission date. Cause In both of these instances, the University’s summer enrollment reporting process of only reporting applicable changes for students enrolled in summer courses failed to identify these changes as neither student was enrolled in a summer course. Possible Asserted Effect Untimely submission of student enrollment status information affects the determinations that lenders and servicers of students’ loans make related to in-school status, deferments, grace periods, and repayment schedules, as well as the federal government’s payment of interest subsidies. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sampling The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A portion of prior year finding 2023-001 related to issues affecting timeliness of enrollment reporting resulting from the University’s internal control processes not operating consistently to ensure that all enrollment changes, including transfers effective at the end of the semester, be submitted timely to NSLDS. Recommendation We recommend that the University review and revise its processes and internal controls to ensure that all enrollment information and status changes, including those effective at the end of a semester, are reported in a timely manner. Views of Responsible Officials The University places significant importance on the accurate and timely reporting of enrollment status changes, recognizing its crucial role in facilitating lenders and servicers of student loans to determine in-school status, deferments, grace periods, and repayment schedules. Additionally, it plays a pivotal role in ensuring the federal government’s payment of interest subsidies. The delay in reporting the enrollment status changes for two students was due to the University's summer enrollment reporting process only reporting changes for students enrolled in summer courses. This process failed to identify status changes reported after the end of the spring semester when the student was not enrolled in the summer. As a result, the status change was not picked up for reporting until late summer. To address and prevent such issues in the future, the University has implemented enhanced controls to capture status changes outside of the term being reported. These measures, along with clearly defined procedures for managing enrollment reporting ensures the timely submission of status changes. Additionally, the University commits to conducting regular reviews and updates of its reporting processes to ensure compliance with federal requirements and to avoid potential delays in the future.
Finding No.: 2024-001 – Enrollment Reporting Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-through Agency: Direct Program Name: Student Financial Assistance Cluster – Federal Direct Loan Program, Federal Pell Grant Program CFDA Numbers: 84.268, 84.063 Federal Award Year: July 1, 2023 – June 30, 2024 Criteria Institutions are required to report enrollment information under the Pell grant, Direct Loan, and Federal Family Education Loan (FFEL) programs via the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) (OMB No. 1845-0035) (Pell, 34 CFR 690.83(b)(2); Direct Loan, 34 CFR 685.309). The administration of the Title IV programs depends heavily on the accuracy and timeliness of the enrollment reported by institutions. The Department of Education lists several certification methods for enrollment reporting, including certifying directly through the NSLDS web site, certifying through the NSLDS’s batch enrollment reporting process, or through certification of rosters provided to the National Student Clearinghouse (NSC). Per 2 CFR 200.303, a non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the federal award. Condition Found The University generally certifies its enrollment information through rosters provided to the NSC. Of the 60 students with enrollment changes that we selected for test work, we identified two (2) students whose changes in enrollment status were not timely transmitted to NSLDS, as follows: • For one (1) student, the University was notified of the student’s enrollment status change from full-time to “Withdrew” in May 2024. Accordingly, the student’s’ status change should have been transmitted within 60 days of that date. However, submission was not timely as the final submission of change of status was sixty-seven (67) days after the required submission date. • For one (1) student, the University placed the student on academic suspension on June 3, 2024. Accordingly, the students’ status change should have been transmitted within 60 days of that date. However, submission was not timely as the final submission of change of status was fifty (50) days after the required submission date. Cause In both of these instances, the University’s summer enrollment reporting process of only reporting applicable changes for students enrolled in summer courses failed to identify these changes as neither student was enrolled in a summer course. Possible Asserted Effect Untimely submission of student enrollment status information affects the determinations that lenders and servicers of students’ loans make related to in-school status, deferments, grace periods, and repayment schedules, as well as the federal government’s payment of interest subsidies. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sampling The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A portion of prior year finding 2023-001 related to issues affecting timeliness of enrollment reporting resulting from the University’s internal control processes not operating consistently to ensure that all enrollment changes, including transfers effective at the end of the semester, be submitted timely to NSLDS. Recommendation We recommend that the University review and revise its processes and internal controls to ensure that all enrollment information and status changes, including those effective at the end of a semester, are reported in a timely manner. Views of Responsible Officials The University places significant importance on the accurate and timely reporting of enrollment status changes, recognizing its crucial role in facilitating lenders and servicers of student loans to determine in-school status, deferments, grace periods, and repayment schedules. Additionally, it plays a pivotal role in ensuring the federal government’s payment of interest subsidies. The delay in reporting the enrollment status changes for two students was due to the University's summer enrollment reporting process only reporting changes for students enrolled in summer courses. This process failed to identify status changes reported after the end of the spring semester when the student was not enrolled in the summer. As a result, the status change was not picked up for reporting until late summer. To address and prevent such issues in the future, the University has implemented enhanced controls to capture status changes outside of the term being reported. These measures, along with clearly defined procedures for managing enrollment reporting ensures the timely submission of status changes. Additionally, the University commits to conducting regular reviews and updates of its reporting processes to ensure compliance with federal requirements and to avoid potential delays in the future.