FINDING 2024-001 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2023, FY2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Eligibility Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the eligibility compliance requirement. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with eligibility requirements. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: During the testing of internal controls over eligibility determinations for free and reduced meals, we noted there was no formal review control in place. There is no documented, secondary review for the applications entered in the food service software which determines eligibility. Additionally, there was no documented review by School Corporation personnel of the Income Eligibility Guidelines used by the food service software which are updated on annual basis. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the School Corporation's management establish an internal control process to review the updates to the annual adjustments to the Income Eligibility Guidelines made to the food service software to determine eligibility to ensure updated guidelines are accurate and complete. This review should be documented on annual basis to confirm management’s oversight and monitoring of eligibility determinations. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2024-001 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2023, FY2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Eligibility Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the eligibility compliance requirement. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with eligibility requirements. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: During the testing of internal controls over eligibility determinations for free and reduced meals, we noted there was no formal review control in place. There is no documented, secondary review for the applications entered in the food service software which determines eligibility. Additionally, there was no documented review by School Corporation personnel of the Income Eligibility Guidelines used by the food service software which are updated on annual basis. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the School Corporation's management establish an internal control process to review the updates to the annual adjustments to the Income Eligibility Guidelines made to the food service software to determine eligibility to ensure updated guidelines are accurate and complete. This review should be documented on annual basis to confirm management’s oversight and monitoring of eligibility determinations. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2024-002 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster – Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2023, FY2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal Entity must use one of the following methods of procurement. . . . (b) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Child Nutrition Program and Procurement compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: For one of the two small purchase method procurements sampled for testing, we noted that the School Corporation, did not obtain quotes from an adequate number of qualified sources. The sample item amount disbursed was $69,649 in FY23 and $110,313 in FY24 for food service technology support. The School Corporation did properly perform a suspension and debarment check on the vendor. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls related to ensure that the School Corporation’s procurement policy is adhered to and quotes are obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as required for small purchase method procurements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2024-002 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster – Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2023, FY2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal Entity must use one of the following methods of procurement. . . . (b) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Child Nutrition Program and Procurement compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: For one of the two small purchase method procurements sampled for testing, we noted that the School Corporation, did not obtain quotes from an adequate number of qualified sources. The sample item amount disbursed was $69,649 in FY23 and $110,313 in FY24 for food service technology support. The School Corporation did properly perform a suspension and debarment check on the vendor. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls related to ensure that the School Corporation’s procurement policy is adhered to and quotes are obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as required for small purchase method procurements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2024-002 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster – Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2023, FY2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal Entity must use one of the following methods of procurement. . . . (b) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Child Nutrition Program and Procurement compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: For one of the two small purchase method procurements sampled for testing, we noted that the School Corporation, did not obtain quotes from an adequate number of qualified sources. The sample item amount disbursed was $69,649 in FY23 and $110,313 in FY24 for food service technology support. The School Corporation did properly perform a suspension and debarment check on the vendor. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls related to ensure that the School Corporation’s procurement policy is adhered to and quotes are obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as required for small purchase method procurements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2024-002 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster – Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2023, FY2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal Entity must use one of the following methods of procurement. . . . (b) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Child Nutrition Program and Procurement compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: For one of the two small purchase method procurements sampled for testing, we noted that the School Corporation, did not obtain quotes from an adequate number of qualified sources. The sample item amount disbursed was $69,649 in FY23 and $110,313 in FY24 for food service technology support. The School Corporation did properly perform a suspension and debarment check on the vendor. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls related to ensure that the School Corporation’s procurement policy is adhered to and quotes are obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as required for small purchase method procurements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2024-003 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Material Weakness, Other Matters Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the cash management compliance requirement. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the reporting requirements. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: $9,976 overstatement, $1,467 understatement of claimed meals Context: During the testing of claim reimbursements, we noted two monthly reimbursements in a sample of four claims where the number of meals claimed for reimbursement did not agree to underlying meal system reports. For one claim reimbursement, there was an overstatement of $9,976 and on another an understatement of $1,467. This resulted in a net over reimbursement $8,509 in the testing sample. The lack of controls and noncompliance was isolated to fiscal year 2024. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management review internal controls surrounding the claim reimbursement process. The secondary, documented review of the request for reimbursement should include a review of the underlying meal count reports to ensure the claim reimbursement request is accurate and complete. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2024-003 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Material Weakness, Other Matters Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the cash management compliance requirement. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the reporting requirements. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: $9,976 overstatement, $1,467 understatement of claimed meals Context: During the testing of claim reimbursements, we noted two monthly reimbursements in a sample of four claims where the number of meals claimed for reimbursement did not agree to underlying meal system reports. For one claim reimbursement, there was an overstatement of $9,976 and on another an understatement of $1,467. This resulted in a net over reimbursement $8,509 in the testing sample. The lack of controls and noncompliance was isolated to fiscal year 2024. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management review internal controls surrounding the claim reimbursement process. The secondary, documented review of the request for reimbursement should include a review of the underlying meal count reports to ensure the claim reimbursement request is accurate and complete. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2024-003 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Material Weakness, Other Matters Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the cash management compliance requirement. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the reporting requirements. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: $9,976 overstatement, $1,467 understatement of claimed meals Context: During the testing of claim reimbursements, we noted two monthly reimbursements in a sample of four claims where the number of meals claimed for reimbursement did not agree to underlying meal system reports. For one claim reimbursement, there was an overstatement of $9,976 and on another an understatement of $1,467. This resulted in a net over reimbursement $8,509 in the testing sample. The lack of controls and noncompliance was isolated to fiscal year 2024. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management review internal controls surrounding the claim reimbursement process. The secondary, documented review of the request for reimbursement should include a review of the underlying meal count reports to ensure the claim reimbursement request is accurate and complete. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2024-003 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Material Weakness, Other Matters Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the cash management compliance requirement. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the reporting requirements. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: $9,976 overstatement, $1,467 understatement of claimed meals Context: During the testing of claim reimbursements, we noted two monthly reimbursements in a sample of four claims where the number of meals claimed for reimbursement did not agree to underlying meal system reports. For one claim reimbursement, there was an overstatement of $9,976 and on another an understatement of $1,467. This resulted in a net over reimbursement $8,509 in the testing sample. The lack of controls and noncompliance was isolated to fiscal year 2024. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management review internal controls surrounding the claim reimbursement process. The secondary, documented review of the request for reimbursement should include a review of the underlying meal count reports to ensure the claim reimbursement request is accurate and complete. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
2024 -002 Approval Of Payroll Expense Transactions - Significant Deficiency - Activities Allowed Or Unallowed And Allowable Costs/Cost Principles ALNs 10.555/10.553 - Child Nutrition Cluster, 21.027 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, 84027 - Special Education, IDEA B (SPED) And 84.425/84.425C/84.425D/84.425U Education Stabilization Fund (ESSER) Criteria: The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303 requires that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e. auditee management) establish and maintain internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. The School has an internal control in place that payroll transactions are approved by the respective principal prior to their submission for payment Condition: During the course of the audit, the engagement team identified multiple expenditures where the support showing the principal’s approval of the federal grant expense was unable to be provided. Cause: The entity did not maintain sufficient support documentation to prove that expenditures were reviewed before payroll transactions were submitted for payment. Effect: Potential noncompliance could occur if expenditure amounts are not reviewed by the principal for accuracy and completeness. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context: These audit findings represent a systemic issue. Identification As A Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: The School should maintain proper documentation of approvals for all payroll transactions. View Of Responsible Officials: A process was put in place in January 2024 to ensure that all principal approvals are documented in writing or electronic approval in the system which can be date stamped by the system. Payroll will not be run, nor grants submitted, until proper approval is received.
2024 -002 Approval Of Payroll Expense Transactions - Significant Deficiency - Activities Allowed Or Unallowed And Allowable Costs/Cost Principles ALNs 10.555/10.553 - Child Nutrition Cluster, 21.027 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, 84027 - Special Education, IDEA B (SPED) And 84.425/84.425C/84.425D/84.425U Education Stabilization Fund (ESSER) Criteria: The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303 requires that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e. auditee management) establish and maintain internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. The School has an internal control in place that payroll transactions are approved by the respective principal prior to their submission for payment Condition: During the course of the audit, the engagement team identified multiple expenditures where the support showing the principal’s approval of the federal grant expense was unable to be provided. Cause: The entity did not maintain sufficient support documentation to prove that expenditures were reviewed before payroll transactions were submitted for payment. Effect: Potential noncompliance could occur if expenditure amounts are not reviewed by the principal for accuracy and completeness. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context: These audit findings represent a systemic issue. Identification As A Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: The School should maintain proper documentation of approvals for all payroll transactions. View Of Responsible Officials: A process was put in place in January 2024 to ensure that all principal approvals are documented in writing or electronic approval in the system which can be date stamped by the system. Payroll will not be run, nor grants submitted, until proper approval is received.
2024 -002 Approval Of Payroll Expense Transactions - Significant Deficiency - Activities Allowed Or Unallowed And Allowable Costs/Cost Principles ALNs 10.555/10.553 - Child Nutrition Cluster, 21.027 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, 84027 - Special Education, IDEA B (SPED) And 84.425/84.425C/84.425D/84.425U Education Stabilization Fund (ESSER) Criteria: The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303 requires that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e. auditee management) establish and maintain internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. The School has an internal control in place that payroll transactions are approved by the respective principal prior to their submission for payment Condition: During the course of the audit, the engagement team identified multiple expenditures where the support showing the principal’s approval of the federal grant expense was unable to be provided. Cause: The entity did not maintain sufficient support documentation to prove that expenditures were reviewed before payroll transactions were submitted for payment. Effect: Potential noncompliance could occur if expenditure amounts are not reviewed by the principal for accuracy and completeness. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context: These audit findings represent a systemic issue. Identification As A Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: The School should maintain proper documentation of approvals for all payroll transactions. View Of Responsible Officials: A process was put in place in January 2024 to ensure that all principal approvals are documented in writing or electronic approval in the system which can be date stamped by the system. Payroll will not be run, nor grants submitted, until proper approval is received.
2024 -002 Approval Of Payroll Expense Transactions - Significant Deficiency - Activities Allowed Or Unallowed And Allowable Costs/Cost Principles ALNs 10.555/10.553 - Child Nutrition Cluster, 21.027 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, 84027 - Special Education, IDEA B (SPED) And 84.425/84.425C/84.425D/84.425U Education Stabilization Fund (ESSER) Criteria: The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303 requires that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e. auditee management) establish and maintain internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. The School has an internal control in place that payroll transactions are approved by the respective principal prior to their submission for payment Condition: During the course of the audit, the engagement team identified multiple expenditures where the support showing the principal’s approval of the federal grant expense was unable to be provided. Cause: The entity did not maintain sufficient support documentation to prove that expenditures were reviewed before payroll transactions were submitted for payment. Effect: Potential noncompliance could occur if expenditure amounts are not reviewed by the principal for accuracy and completeness. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context: These audit findings represent a systemic issue. Identification As A Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: The School should maintain proper documentation of approvals for all payroll transactions. View Of Responsible Officials: A process was put in place in January 2024 to ensure that all principal approvals are documented in writing or electronic approval in the system which can be date stamped by the system. Payroll will not be run, nor grants submitted, until proper approval is received.
2024 -002 Approval Of Payroll Expense Transactions - Significant Deficiency - Activities Allowed Or Unallowed And Allowable Costs/Cost Principles ALNs 10.555/10.553 - Child Nutrition Cluster, 21.027 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, 84027 - Special Education, IDEA B (SPED) And 84.425/84.425C/84.425D/84.425U Education Stabilization Fund (ESSER) Criteria: The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303 requires that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e. auditee management) establish and maintain internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. The School has an internal control in place that payroll transactions are approved by the respective principal prior to their submission for payment Condition: During the course of the audit, the engagement team identified multiple expenditures where the support showing the principal’s approval of the federal grant expense was unable to be provided. Cause: The entity did not maintain sufficient support documentation to prove that expenditures were reviewed before payroll transactions were submitted for payment. Effect: Potential noncompliance could occur if expenditure amounts are not reviewed by the principal for accuracy and completeness. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context: These audit findings represent a systemic issue. Identification As A Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: The School should maintain proper documentation of approvals for all payroll transactions. View Of Responsible Officials: A process was put in place in January 2024 to ensure that all principal approvals are documented in writing or electronic approval in the system which can be date stamped by the system. Payroll will not be run, nor grants submitted, until proper approval is received.
2024 -002 Approval Of Payroll Expense Transactions - Significant Deficiency - Activities Allowed Or Unallowed And Allowable Costs/Cost Principles ALNs 10.555/10.553 - Child Nutrition Cluster, 21.027 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, 84027 - Special Education, IDEA B (SPED) And 84.425/84.425C/84.425D/84.425U Education Stabilization Fund (ESSER) Criteria: The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303 requires that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e. auditee management) establish and maintain internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. The School has an internal control in place that payroll transactions are approved by the respective principal prior to their submission for payment Condition: During the course of the audit, the engagement team identified multiple expenditures where the support showing the principal’s approval of the federal grant expense was unable to be provided. Cause: The entity did not maintain sufficient support documentation to prove that expenditures were reviewed before payroll transactions were submitted for payment. Effect: Potential noncompliance could occur if expenditure amounts are not reviewed by the principal for accuracy and completeness. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context: These audit findings represent a systemic issue. Identification As A Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: The School should maintain proper documentation of approvals for all payroll transactions. View Of Responsible Officials: A process was put in place in January 2024 to ensure that all principal approvals are documented in writing or electronic approval in the system which can be date stamped by the system. Payroll will not be run, nor grants submitted, until proper approval is received.
2024 -002 Approval Of Payroll Expense Transactions - Significant Deficiency - Activities Allowed Or Unallowed And Allowable Costs/Cost Principles ALNs 10.555/10.553 - Child Nutrition Cluster, 21.027 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, 84027 - Special Education, IDEA B (SPED) And 84.425/84.425C/84.425D/84.425U Education Stabilization Fund (ESSER) Criteria: The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303 requires that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e. auditee management) establish and maintain internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. The School has an internal control in place that payroll transactions are approved by the respective principal prior to their submission for payment Condition: During the course of the audit, the engagement team identified multiple expenditures where the support showing the principal’s approval of the federal grant expense was unable to be provided. Cause: The entity did not maintain sufficient support documentation to prove that expenditures were reviewed before payroll transactions were submitted for payment. Effect: Potential noncompliance could occur if expenditure amounts are not reviewed by the principal for accuracy and completeness. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context: These audit findings represent a systemic issue. Identification As A Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: The School should maintain proper documentation of approvals for all payroll transactions. View Of Responsible Officials: A process was put in place in January 2024 to ensure that all principal approvals are documented in writing or electronic approval in the system which can be date stamped by the system. Payroll will not be run, nor grants submitted, until proper approval is received.
2024 -002 Approval Of Payroll Expense Transactions - Significant Deficiency - Activities Allowed Or Unallowed And Allowable Costs/Cost Principles ALNs 10.555/10.553 - Child Nutrition Cluster, 21.027 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, 84027 - Special Education, IDEA B (SPED) And 84.425/84.425C/84.425D/84.425U Education Stabilization Fund (ESSER) Criteria: The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303 requires that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e. auditee management) establish and maintain internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. The School has an internal control in place that payroll transactions are approved by the respective principal prior to their submission for payment Condition: During the course of the audit, the engagement team identified multiple expenditures where the support showing the principal’s approval of the federal grant expense was unable to be provided. Cause: The entity did not maintain sufficient support documentation to prove that expenditures were reviewed before payroll transactions were submitted for payment. Effect: Potential noncompliance could occur if expenditure amounts are not reviewed by the principal for accuracy and completeness. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context: These audit findings represent a systemic issue. Identification As A Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: The School should maintain proper documentation of approvals for all payroll transactions. View Of Responsible Officials: A process was put in place in January 2024 to ensure that all principal approvals are documented in writing or electronic approval in the system which can be date stamped by the system. Payroll will not be run, nor grants submitted, until proper approval is received.
2024 -002 Approval Of Payroll Expense Transactions - Significant Deficiency - Activities Allowed Or Unallowed And Allowable Costs/Cost Principles ALNs 10.555/10.553 - Child Nutrition Cluster, 21.027 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, 84027 - Special Education, IDEA B (SPED) And 84.425/84.425C/84.425D/84.425U Education Stabilization Fund (ESSER) Criteria: The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303 requires that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e. auditee management) establish and maintain internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. The School has an internal control in place that payroll transactions are approved by the respective principal prior to their submission for payment Condition: During the course of the audit, the engagement team identified multiple expenditures where the support showing the principal’s approval of the federal grant expense was unable to be provided. Cause: The entity did not maintain sufficient support documentation to prove that expenditures were reviewed before payroll transactions were submitted for payment. Effect: Potential noncompliance could occur if expenditure amounts are not reviewed by the principal for accuracy and completeness. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context: These audit findings represent a systemic issue. Identification As A Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: The School should maintain proper documentation of approvals for all payroll transactions. View Of Responsible Officials: A process was put in place in January 2024 to ensure that all principal approvals are documented in writing or electronic approval in the system which can be date stamped by the system. Payroll will not be run, nor grants submitted, until proper approval is received.
2024 -002 Approval Of Payroll Expense Transactions - Significant Deficiency - Activities Allowed Or Unallowed And Allowable Costs/Cost Principles ALNs 10.555/10.553 - Child Nutrition Cluster, 21.027 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, 84027 - Special Education, IDEA B (SPED) And 84.425/84.425C/84.425D/84.425U Education Stabilization Fund (ESSER) Criteria: The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303 requires that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e. auditee management) establish and maintain internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. The School has an internal control in place that payroll transactions are approved by the respective principal prior to their submission for payment Condition: During the course of the audit, the engagement team identified multiple expenditures where the support showing the principal’s approval of the federal grant expense was unable to be provided. Cause: The entity did not maintain sufficient support documentation to prove that expenditures were reviewed before payroll transactions were submitted for payment. Effect: Potential noncompliance could occur if expenditure amounts are not reviewed by the principal for accuracy and completeness. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context: These audit findings represent a systemic issue. Identification As A Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: The School should maintain proper documentation of approvals for all payroll transactions. View Of Responsible Officials: A process was put in place in January 2024 to ensure that all principal approvals are documented in writing or electronic approval in the system which can be date stamped by the system. Payroll will not be run, nor grants submitted, until proper approval is received.
2024 -002 Approval Of Payroll Expense Transactions - Significant Deficiency - Activities Allowed Or Unallowed And Allowable Costs/Cost Principles ALNs 10.555/10.553 - Child Nutrition Cluster, 21.027 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, 84027 - Special Education, IDEA B (SPED) And 84.425/84.425C/84.425D/84.425U Education Stabilization Fund (ESSER) Criteria: The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303 requires that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e. auditee management) establish and maintain internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. The School has an internal control in place that payroll transactions are approved by the respective principal prior to their submission for payment Condition: During the course of the audit, the engagement team identified multiple expenditures where the support showing the principal’s approval of the federal grant expense was unable to be provided. Cause: The entity did not maintain sufficient support documentation to prove that expenditures were reviewed before payroll transactions were submitted for payment. Effect: Potential noncompliance could occur if expenditure amounts are not reviewed by the principal for accuracy and completeness. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context: These audit findings represent a systemic issue. Identification As A Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: The School should maintain proper documentation of approvals for all payroll transactions. View Of Responsible Officials: A process was put in place in January 2024 to ensure that all principal approvals are documented in writing or electronic approval in the system which can be date stamped by the system. Payroll will not be run, nor grants submitted, until proper approval is received.
2024 -002 Approval Of Payroll Expense Transactions - Significant Deficiency - Activities Allowed Or Unallowed And Allowable Costs/Cost Principles ALNs 10.555/10.553 - Child Nutrition Cluster, 21.027 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, 84027 - Special Education, IDEA B (SPED) And 84.425/84.425C/84.425D/84.425U Education Stabilization Fund (ESSER) Criteria: The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303 requires that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e. auditee management) establish and maintain internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. The School has an internal control in place that payroll transactions are approved by the respective principal prior to their submission for payment Condition: During the course of the audit, the engagement team identified multiple expenditures where the support showing the principal’s approval of the federal grant expense was unable to be provided. Cause: The entity did not maintain sufficient support documentation to prove that expenditures were reviewed before payroll transactions were submitted for payment. Effect: Potential noncompliance could occur if expenditure amounts are not reviewed by the principal for accuracy and completeness. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context: These audit findings represent a systemic issue. Identification As A Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: The School should maintain proper documentation of approvals for all payroll transactions. View Of Responsible Officials: A process was put in place in January 2024 to ensure that all principal approvals are documented in writing or electronic approval in the system which can be date stamped by the system. Payroll will not be run, nor grants submitted, until proper approval is received.
2024 -002 Approval Of Payroll Expense Transactions - Significant Deficiency - Activities Allowed Or Unallowed And Allowable Costs/Cost Principles ALNs 10.555/10.553 - Child Nutrition Cluster, 21.027 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, 84027 - Special Education, IDEA B (SPED) And 84.425/84.425C/84.425D/84.425U Education Stabilization Fund (ESSER) Criteria: The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303 requires that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e. auditee management) establish and maintain internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. The School has an internal control in place that payroll transactions are approved by the respective principal prior to their submission for payment Condition: During the course of the audit, the engagement team identified multiple expenditures where the support showing the principal’s approval of the federal grant expense was unable to be provided. Cause: The entity did not maintain sufficient support documentation to prove that expenditures were reviewed before payroll transactions were submitted for payment. Effect: Potential noncompliance could occur if expenditure amounts are not reviewed by the principal for accuracy and completeness. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context: These audit findings represent a systemic issue. Identification As A Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: The School should maintain proper documentation of approvals for all payroll transactions. View Of Responsible Officials: A process was put in place in January 2024 to ensure that all principal approvals are documented in writing or electronic approval in the system which can be date stamped by the system. Payroll will not be run, nor grants submitted, until proper approval is received.
2024 -002 Approval Of Payroll Expense Transactions - Significant Deficiency - Activities Allowed Or Unallowed And Allowable Costs/Cost Principles ALNs 10.555/10.553 - Child Nutrition Cluster, 21.027 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, 84027 - Special Education, IDEA B (SPED) And 84.425/84.425C/84.425D/84.425U Education Stabilization Fund (ESSER) Criteria: The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303 requires that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e. auditee management) establish and maintain internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. The School has an internal control in place that payroll transactions are approved by the respective principal prior to their submission for payment Condition: During the course of the audit, the engagement team identified multiple expenditures where the support showing the principal’s approval of the federal grant expense was unable to be provided. Cause: The entity did not maintain sufficient support documentation to prove that expenditures were reviewed before payroll transactions were submitted for payment. Effect: Potential noncompliance could occur if expenditure amounts are not reviewed by the principal for accuracy and completeness. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context: These audit findings represent a systemic issue. Identification As A Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: The School should maintain proper documentation of approvals for all payroll transactions. View Of Responsible Officials: A process was put in place in January 2024 to ensure that all principal approvals are documented in writing or electronic approval in the system which can be date stamped by the system. Payroll will not be run, nor grants submitted, until proper approval is received.
2024 -002 Approval Of Payroll Expense Transactions - Significant Deficiency - Activities Allowed Or Unallowed And Allowable Costs/Cost Principles ALNs 10.555/10.553 - Child Nutrition Cluster, 21.027 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, 84027 - Special Education, IDEA B (SPED) And 84.425/84.425C/84.425D/84.425U Education Stabilization Fund (ESSER) Criteria: The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303 requires that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e. auditee management) establish and maintain internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. The School has an internal control in place that payroll transactions are approved by the respective principal prior to their submission for payment Condition: During the course of the audit, the engagement team identified multiple expenditures where the support showing the principal’s approval of the federal grant expense was unable to be provided. Cause: The entity did not maintain sufficient support documentation to prove that expenditures were reviewed before payroll transactions were submitted for payment. Effect: Potential noncompliance could occur if expenditure amounts are not reviewed by the principal for accuracy and completeness. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context: These audit findings represent a systemic issue. Identification As A Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: The School should maintain proper documentation of approvals for all payroll transactions. View Of Responsible Officials: A process was put in place in January 2024 to ensure that all principal approvals are documented in writing or electronic approval in the system which can be date stamped by the system. Payroll will not be run, nor grants submitted, until proper approval is received.
2024 -002 Approval Of Payroll Expense Transactions - Significant Deficiency - Activities Allowed Or Unallowed And Allowable Costs/Cost Principles ALNs 10.555/10.553 - Child Nutrition Cluster, 21.027 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, 84027 - Special Education, IDEA B (SPED) And 84.425/84.425C/84.425D/84.425U Education Stabilization Fund (ESSER) Criteria: The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303 requires that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e. auditee management) establish and maintain internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. The School has an internal control in place that payroll transactions are approved by the respective principal prior to their submission for payment Condition: During the course of the audit, the engagement team identified multiple expenditures where the support showing the principal’s approval of the federal grant expense was unable to be provided. Cause: The entity did not maintain sufficient support documentation to prove that expenditures were reviewed before payroll transactions were submitted for payment. Effect: Potential noncompliance could occur if expenditure amounts are not reviewed by the principal for accuracy and completeness. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context: These audit findings represent a systemic issue. Identification As A Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: The School should maintain proper documentation of approvals for all payroll transactions. View Of Responsible Officials: A process was put in place in January 2024 to ensure that all principal approvals are documented in writing or electronic approval in the system which can be date stamped by the system. Payroll will not be run, nor grants submitted, until proper approval is received.
2024 -002 Approval Of Payroll Expense Transactions - Significant Deficiency - Activities Allowed Or Unallowed And Allowable Costs/Cost Principles ALNs 10.555/10.553 - Child Nutrition Cluster, 21.027 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, 84027 - Special Education, IDEA B (SPED) And 84.425/84.425C/84.425D/84.425U Education Stabilization Fund (ESSER) Criteria: The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303 requires that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e. auditee management) establish and maintain internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. The School has an internal control in place that payroll transactions are approved by the respective principal prior to their submission for payment Condition: During the course of the audit, the engagement team identified multiple expenditures where the support showing the principal’s approval of the federal grant expense was unable to be provided. Cause: The entity did not maintain sufficient support documentation to prove that expenditures were reviewed before payroll transactions were submitted for payment. Effect: Potential noncompliance could occur if expenditure amounts are not reviewed by the principal for accuracy and completeness. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context: These audit findings represent a systemic issue. Identification As A Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: The School should maintain proper documentation of approvals for all payroll transactions. View Of Responsible Officials: A process was put in place in January 2024 to ensure that all principal approvals are documented in writing or electronic approval in the system which can be date stamped by the system. Payroll will not be run, nor grants submitted, until proper approval is received.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 and 84.173 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H027A220035 Pass-Through Agency: Maryland State Department of Education Pass-Through Number: 231072 Award Period: 10/1/2022 - 9/30/2024 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Control over Compliance, Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion) Criteria or Specific Requirement: Compliance: Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. 2 CFR 180.300 states that an entity may determine suspension and debarment status by: (a) Checking SAM (System for Award Management) Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should comply with the guidance in "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the "Internal Control-Integrated Framework," issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: During our testing, we noted the School Board did not have adequate internal controls designed to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None Noted Context: The School Board could not provide documentation for two out of four vendors regarding ensuring the vendor was not suspended or debarred at the time of contract. Cause: The Board’s procedures and internal controls over suspension and debarment were not sufficient to ensure that all vendors’ suspension and debarment status was verified timely. Effect: Failure to verify the suspension and debarment status of vendors may result in the procurement of goods or services from vendors that are suspended or debarred and result in unallowable expenditures charged to the program. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the Board review its policies and procedures to ensure they include the three options for determining suspension and debarment status listed in 2 CFR 180.300 and that controls are sufficient to ensure that the suspension and debarment status is verified for all vendors prior to entering into covered transactions. Views of responsible officials: Management acknowledges the finding. Current procedures mandate suspension and debarment verification prior to entering into contracts or agreements with vendors. However, due to the timing of the policy implementation, there were vendor contracts executed and payments processed after the prior year's finding but before corrective action could be implemented.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 and 84.173 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H027A220035 Pass-Through Agency: Maryland State Department of Education Pass-Through Number: 231072 Award Period: 10/1/2022 - 9/30/2024 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Control over Compliance, Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion) Criteria or Specific Requirement: Compliance: Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. 2 CFR 180.300 states that an entity may determine suspension and debarment status by: (a) Checking SAM (System for Award Management) Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should comply with the guidance in "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the "Internal Control-Integrated Framework," issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: During our testing, we noted the School Board did not have adequate internal controls designed to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None Noted Context: The School Board could not provide documentation for two out of four vendors regarding ensuring the vendor was not suspended or debarred at the time of contract. Cause: The Board’s procedures and internal controls over suspension and debarment were not sufficient to ensure that all vendors’ suspension and debarment status was verified timely. Effect: Failure to verify the suspension and debarment status of vendors may result in the procurement of goods or services from vendors that are suspended or debarred and result in unallowable expenditures charged to the program. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the Board review its policies and procedures to ensure they include the three options for determining suspension and debarment status listed in 2 CFR 180.300 and that controls are sufficient to ensure that the suspension and debarment status is verified for all vendors prior to entering into covered transactions. Views of responsible officials: Management acknowledges the finding. Current procedures mandate suspension and debarment verification prior to entering into contracts or agreements with vendors. However, due to the timing of the policy implementation, there were vendor contracts executed and payments processed after the prior year's finding but before corrective action could be implemented.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 and 84.173 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H027A220035 Pass-Through Agency: Maryland State Department of Education Pass-Through Number: 231072 Award Period: 10/1/2022 - 9/30/2024 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Control over Compliance, Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion) Criteria or Specific Requirement: Compliance: Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. 2 CFR 180.300 states that an entity may determine suspension and debarment status by: (a) Checking SAM (System for Award Management) Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should comply with the guidance in "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the "Internal Control-Integrated Framework," issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: During our testing, we noted the School Board did not have adequate internal controls designed to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None Noted Context: The School Board could not provide documentation for two out of four vendors regarding ensuring the vendor was not suspended or debarred at the time of contract. Cause: The Board’s procedures and internal controls over suspension and debarment were not sufficient to ensure that all vendors’ suspension and debarment status was verified timely. Effect: Failure to verify the suspension and debarment status of vendors may result in the procurement of goods or services from vendors that are suspended or debarred and result in unallowable expenditures charged to the program. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the Board review its policies and procedures to ensure they include the three options for determining suspension and debarment status listed in 2 CFR 180.300 and that controls are sufficient to ensure that the suspension and debarment status is verified for all vendors prior to entering into covered transactions. Views of responsible officials: Management acknowledges the finding. Current procedures mandate suspension and debarment verification prior to entering into contracts or agreements with vendors. However, due to the timing of the policy implementation, there were vendor contracts executed and payments processed after the prior year's finding but before corrective action could be implemented.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 and 84.173 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H027A220035 Pass-Through Agency: Maryland State Department of Education Pass-Through Number: 231072 Award Period: 10/1/2022 - 9/30/2024 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Control over Compliance, Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion) Criteria or Specific Requirement: Compliance: Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. 2 CFR 180.300 states that an entity may determine suspension and debarment status by: (a) Checking SAM (System for Award Management) Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should comply with the guidance in "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the "Internal Control-Integrated Framework," issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: During our testing, we noted the School Board did not have adequate internal controls designed to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None Noted Context: The School Board could not provide documentation for two out of four vendors regarding ensuring the vendor was not suspended or debarred at the time of contract. Cause: The Board’s procedures and internal controls over suspension and debarment were not sufficient to ensure that all vendors’ suspension and debarment status was verified timely. Effect: Failure to verify the suspension and debarment status of vendors may result in the procurement of goods or services from vendors that are suspended or debarred and result in unallowable expenditures charged to the program. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the Board review its policies and procedures to ensure they include the three options for determining suspension and debarment status listed in 2 CFR 180.300 and that controls are sufficient to ensure that the suspension and debarment status is verified for all vendors prior to entering into covered transactions. Views of responsible officials: Management acknowledges the finding. Current procedures mandate suspension and debarment verification prior to entering into contracts or agreements with vendors. However, due to the timing of the policy implementation, there were vendor contracts executed and payments processed after the prior year's finding but before corrective action could be implemented.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 and 84.173 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H027A220035 Pass-Through Agency: Maryland State Department of Education Pass-Through Number: 231072 Award Period: 10/1/2022 - 9/30/2024 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Control over Compliance, Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion) Criteria or Specific Requirement: Compliance: Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. 2 CFR 180.300 states that an entity may determine suspension and debarment status by: (a) Checking SAM (System for Award Management) Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should comply with the guidance in "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the "Internal Control-Integrated Framework," issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: During our testing, we noted the School Board did not have adequate internal controls designed to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None Noted Context: The School Board could not provide documentation for two out of four vendors regarding ensuring the vendor was not suspended or debarred at the time of contract. Cause: The Board’s procedures and internal controls over suspension and debarment were not sufficient to ensure that all vendors’ suspension and debarment status was verified timely. Effect: Failure to verify the suspension and debarment status of vendors may result in the procurement of goods or services from vendors that are suspended or debarred and result in unallowable expenditures charged to the program. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the Board review its policies and procedures to ensure they include the three options for determining suspension and debarment status listed in 2 CFR 180.300 and that controls are sufficient to ensure that the suspension and debarment status is verified for all vendors prior to entering into covered transactions. Views of responsible officials: Management acknowledges the finding. Current procedures mandate suspension and debarment verification prior to entering into contracts or agreements with vendors. However, due to the timing of the policy implementation, there were vendor contracts executed and payments processed after the prior year's finding but before corrective action could be implemented.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 and 84.173 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H027A220035 Pass-Through Agency: Maryland State Department of Education Pass-Through Number: 231072 Award Period: 10/1/2022 - 9/30/2024 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Control over Compliance, Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion) Criteria or Specific Requirement: Compliance: Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. 2 CFR 180.300 states that an entity may determine suspension and debarment status by: (a) Checking SAM (System for Award Management) Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should comply with the guidance in "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the "Internal Control-Integrated Framework," issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: During our testing, we noted the School Board did not have adequate internal controls designed to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None Noted Context: The School Board could not provide documentation for two out of four vendors regarding ensuring the vendor was not suspended or debarred at the time of contract. Cause: The Board’s procedures and internal controls over suspension and debarment were not sufficient to ensure that all vendors’ suspension and debarment status was verified timely. Effect: Failure to verify the suspension and debarment status of vendors may result in the procurement of goods or services from vendors that are suspended or debarred and result in unallowable expenditures charged to the program. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the Board review its policies and procedures to ensure they include the three options for determining suspension and debarment status listed in 2 CFR 180.300 and that controls are sufficient to ensure that the suspension and debarment status is verified for all vendors prior to entering into covered transactions. Views of responsible officials: Management acknowledges the finding. Current procedures mandate suspension and debarment verification prior to entering into contracts or agreements with vendors. However, due to the timing of the policy implementation, there were vendor contracts executed and payments processed after the prior year's finding but before corrective action could be implemented.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 and 84.173 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H027A220035 Pass-Through Agency: Maryland State Department of Education Pass-Through Number: 231072 Award Period: 10/1/2022 - 9/30/2024 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Control over Compliance, Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion) Criteria or Specific Requirement: Compliance: Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. 2 CFR 180.300 states that an entity may determine suspension and debarment status by: (a) Checking SAM (System for Award Management) Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should comply with the guidance in "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the "Internal Control-Integrated Framework," issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: During our testing, we noted the School Board did not have adequate internal controls designed to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None Noted Context: The School Board could not provide documentation for two out of four vendors regarding ensuring the vendor was not suspended or debarred at the time of contract. Cause: The Board’s procedures and internal controls over suspension and debarment were not sufficient to ensure that all vendors’ suspension and debarment status was verified timely. Effect: Failure to verify the suspension and debarment status of vendors may result in the procurement of goods or services from vendors that are suspended or debarred and result in unallowable expenditures charged to the program. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the Board review its policies and procedures to ensure they include the three options for determining suspension and debarment status listed in 2 CFR 180.300 and that controls are sufficient to ensure that the suspension and debarment status is verified for all vendors prior to entering into covered transactions. Views of responsible officials: Management acknowledges the finding. Current procedures mandate suspension and debarment verification prior to entering into contracts or agreements with vendors. However, due to the timing of the policy implementation, there were vendor contracts executed and payments processed after the prior year's finding but before corrective action could be implemented.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 and 84.173 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H027A220035 Pass-Through Agency: Maryland State Department of Education Pass-Through Number: 231072 Award Period: 10/1/2022 - 9/30/2024 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Control over Compliance, Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion) Criteria or Specific Requirement: Compliance: Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. 2 CFR 180.300 states that an entity may determine suspension and debarment status by: (a) Checking SAM (System for Award Management) Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should comply with the guidance in "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the "Internal Control-Integrated Framework," issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: During our testing, we noted the School Board did not have adequate internal controls designed to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None Noted Context: The School Board could not provide documentation for two out of four vendors regarding ensuring the vendor was not suspended or debarred at the time of contract. Cause: The Board’s procedures and internal controls over suspension and debarment were not sufficient to ensure that all vendors’ suspension and debarment status was verified timely. Effect: Failure to verify the suspension and debarment status of vendors may result in the procurement of goods or services from vendors that are suspended or debarred and result in unallowable expenditures charged to the program. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the Board review its policies and procedures to ensure they include the three options for determining suspension and debarment status listed in 2 CFR 180.300 and that controls are sufficient to ensure that the suspension and debarment status is verified for all vendors prior to entering into covered transactions. Views of responsible officials: Management acknowledges the finding. Current procedures mandate suspension and debarment verification prior to entering into contracts or agreements with vendors. However, due to the timing of the policy implementation, there were vendor contracts executed and payments processed after the prior year's finding but before corrective action could be implemented.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 and 84.173 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H027A220035 Pass-Through Agency: Maryland State Department of Education Pass-Through Number: 231072 Award Period: 10/1/2022 - 9/30/2024 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Control over Compliance, Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion) Criteria or Specific Requirement: Compliance: Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. 2 CFR 180.300 states that an entity may determine suspension and debarment status by: (a) Checking SAM (System for Award Management) Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should comply with the guidance in "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the "Internal Control-Integrated Framework," issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: During our testing, we noted the School Board did not have adequate internal controls designed to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None Noted Context: The School Board could not provide documentation for two out of four vendors regarding ensuring the vendor was not suspended or debarred at the time of contract. Cause: The Board’s procedures and internal controls over suspension and debarment were not sufficient to ensure that all vendors’ suspension and debarment status was verified timely. Effect: Failure to verify the suspension and debarment status of vendors may result in the procurement of goods or services from vendors that are suspended or debarred and result in unallowable expenditures charged to the program. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the Board review its policies and procedures to ensure they include the three options for determining suspension and debarment status listed in 2 CFR 180.300 and that controls are sufficient to ensure that the suspension and debarment status is verified for all vendors prior to entering into covered transactions. Views of responsible officials: Management acknowledges the finding. Current procedures mandate suspension and debarment verification prior to entering into contracts or agreements with vendors. However, due to the timing of the policy implementation, there were vendor contracts executed and payments processed after the prior year's finding but before corrective action could be implemented.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 and 84.173 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H027A220035 Pass-Through Agency: Maryland State Department of Education Pass-Through Number: 231072 Award Period: 10/1/2022 - 9/30/2024 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Control over Compliance, Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion) Criteria or Specific Requirement: Compliance: Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. 2 CFR 180.300 states that an entity may determine suspension and debarment status by: (a) Checking SAM (System for Award Management) Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should comply with the guidance in "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the "Internal Control-Integrated Framework," issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: During our testing, we noted the School Board did not have adequate internal controls designed to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None Noted Context: The School Board could not provide documentation for two out of four vendors regarding ensuring the vendor was not suspended or debarred at the time of contract. Cause: The Board’s procedures and internal controls over suspension and debarment were not sufficient to ensure that all vendors’ suspension and debarment status was verified timely. Effect: Failure to verify the suspension and debarment status of vendors may result in the procurement of goods or services from vendors that are suspended or debarred and result in unallowable expenditures charged to the program. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the Board review its policies and procedures to ensure they include the three options for determining suspension and debarment status listed in 2 CFR 180.300 and that controls are sufficient to ensure that the suspension and debarment status is verified for all vendors prior to entering into covered transactions. Views of responsible officials: Management acknowledges the finding. Current procedures mandate suspension and debarment verification prior to entering into contracts or agreements with vendors. However, due to the timing of the policy implementation, there were vendor contracts executed and payments processed after the prior year's finding but before corrective action could be implemented.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 and 84.173 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H027A220035 Pass-Through Agency: Maryland State Department of Education Pass-Through Number: 231072 Award Period: 10/1/2022 - 9/30/2024 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Control over Compliance, Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion) Criteria or Specific Requirement: Compliance: Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. 2 CFR 180.300 states that an entity may determine suspension and debarment status by: (a) Checking SAM (System for Award Management) Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should comply with the guidance in "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the "Internal Control-Integrated Framework," issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: During our testing, we noted the School Board did not have adequate internal controls designed to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None Noted Context: The School Board could not provide documentation for two out of four vendors regarding ensuring the vendor was not suspended or debarred at the time of contract. Cause: The Board’s procedures and internal controls over suspension and debarment were not sufficient to ensure that all vendors’ suspension and debarment status was verified timely. Effect: Failure to verify the suspension and debarment status of vendors may result in the procurement of goods or services from vendors that are suspended or debarred and result in unallowable expenditures charged to the program. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the Board review its policies and procedures to ensure they include the three options for determining suspension and debarment status listed in 2 CFR 180.300 and that controls are sufficient to ensure that the suspension and debarment status is verified for all vendors prior to entering into covered transactions. Views of responsible officials: Management acknowledges the finding. Current procedures mandate suspension and debarment verification prior to entering into contracts or agreements with vendors. However, due to the timing of the policy implementation, there were vendor contracts executed and payments processed after the prior year's finding but before corrective action could be implemented.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 and 84.173 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H027A220035 Pass-Through Agency: Maryland State Department of Education Pass-Through Number: 231072 Award Period: 10/1/2022 - 9/30/2024 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Control over Compliance, Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion) Criteria or Specific Requirement: Compliance: Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. 2 CFR 180.300 states that an entity may determine suspension and debarment status by: (a) Checking SAM (System for Award Management) Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should comply with the guidance in "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the "Internal Control-Integrated Framework," issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: During our testing, we noted the School Board did not have adequate internal controls designed to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None Noted Context: The School Board could not provide documentation for two out of four vendors regarding ensuring the vendor was not suspended or debarred at the time of contract. Cause: The Board’s procedures and internal controls over suspension and debarment were not sufficient to ensure that all vendors’ suspension and debarment status was verified timely. Effect: Failure to verify the suspension and debarment status of vendors may result in the procurement of goods or services from vendors that are suspended or debarred and result in unallowable expenditures charged to the program. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the Board review its policies and procedures to ensure they include the three options for determining suspension and debarment status listed in 2 CFR 180.300 and that controls are sufficient to ensure that the suspension and debarment status is verified for all vendors prior to entering into covered transactions. Views of responsible officials: Management acknowledges the finding. Current procedures mandate suspension and debarment verification prior to entering into contracts or agreements with vendors. However, due to the timing of the policy implementation, there were vendor contracts executed and payments processed after the prior year's finding but before corrective action could be implemented.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 and 84.173 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H027A220035 Pass-Through Agency: Maryland State Department of Education Pass-Through Number: 231072 Award Period: 10/1/2022 - 9/30/2024 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Control over Compliance, Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion) Criteria or Specific Requirement: Compliance: Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. 2 CFR 180.300 states that an entity may determine suspension and debarment status by: (a) Checking SAM (System for Award Management) Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should comply with the guidance in "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the "Internal Control-Integrated Framework," issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: During our testing, we noted the School Board did not have adequate internal controls designed to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None Noted Context: The School Board could not provide documentation for two out of four vendors regarding ensuring the vendor was not suspended or debarred at the time of contract. Cause: The Board’s procedures and internal controls over suspension and debarment were not sufficient to ensure that all vendors’ suspension and debarment status was verified timely. Effect: Failure to verify the suspension and debarment status of vendors may result in the procurement of goods or services from vendors that are suspended or debarred and result in unallowable expenditures charged to the program. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the Board review its policies and procedures to ensure they include the three options for determining suspension and debarment status listed in 2 CFR 180.300 and that controls are sufficient to ensure that the suspension and debarment status is verified for all vendors prior to entering into covered transactions. Views of responsible officials: Management acknowledges the finding. Current procedures mandate suspension and debarment verification prior to entering into contracts or agreements with vendors. However, due to the timing of the policy implementation, there were vendor contracts executed and payments processed after the prior year's finding but before corrective action could be implemented.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 and 84.173 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H027A220035 Pass-Through Agency: Maryland State Department of Education Pass-Through Number: 231072 Award Period: 10/1/2022 - 9/30/2024 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Control over Compliance, Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion) Criteria or Specific Requirement: Compliance: Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. 2 CFR 180.300 states that an entity may determine suspension and debarment status by: (a) Checking SAM (System for Award Management) Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should comply with the guidance in "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the "Internal Control-Integrated Framework," issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: During our testing, we noted the School Board did not have adequate internal controls designed to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None Noted Context: The School Board could not provide documentation for two out of four vendors regarding ensuring the vendor was not suspended or debarred at the time of contract. Cause: The Board’s procedures and internal controls over suspension and debarment were not sufficient to ensure that all vendors’ suspension and debarment status was verified timely. Effect: Failure to verify the suspension and debarment status of vendors may result in the procurement of goods or services from vendors that are suspended or debarred and result in unallowable expenditures charged to the program. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the Board review its policies and procedures to ensure they include the three options for determining suspension and debarment status listed in 2 CFR 180.300 and that controls are sufficient to ensure that the suspension and debarment status is verified for all vendors prior to entering into covered transactions. Views of responsible officials: Management acknowledges the finding. Current procedures mandate suspension and debarment verification prior to entering into contracts or agreements with vendors. However, due to the timing of the policy implementation, there were vendor contracts executed and payments processed after the prior year's finding but before corrective action could be implemented.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 and 84.173 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H027A220035 Pass-Through Agency: Maryland State Department of Education Pass-Through Number: 231072 Award Period: 10/1/2022 - 9/30/2024 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Control over Compliance, Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion) Criteria or Specific Requirement: Compliance: Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. 2 CFR 180.300 states that an entity may determine suspension and debarment status by: (a) Checking SAM (System for Award Management) Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should comply with the guidance in "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the "Internal Control-Integrated Framework," issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: During our testing, we noted the School Board did not have adequate internal controls designed to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None Noted Context: The School Board could not provide documentation for two out of four vendors regarding ensuring the vendor was not suspended or debarred at the time of contract. Cause: The Board’s procedures and internal controls over suspension and debarment were not sufficient to ensure that all vendors’ suspension and debarment status was verified timely. Effect: Failure to verify the suspension and debarment status of vendors may result in the procurement of goods or services from vendors that are suspended or debarred and result in unallowable expenditures charged to the program. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the Board review its policies and procedures to ensure they include the three options for determining suspension and debarment status listed in 2 CFR 180.300 and that controls are sufficient to ensure that the suspension and debarment status is verified for all vendors prior to entering into covered transactions. Views of responsible officials: Management acknowledges the finding. Current procedures mandate suspension and debarment verification prior to entering into contracts or agreements with vendors. However, due to the timing of the policy implementation, there were vendor contracts executed and payments processed after the prior year's finding but before corrective action could be implemented.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 and 84.173 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H027A220035 Pass-Through Agency: Maryland State Department of Education Pass-Through Number: 231072 Award Period: 10/1/2022 - 9/30/2024 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Control over Compliance, Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion) Criteria or Specific Requirement: Compliance: Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. 2 CFR 180.300 states that an entity may determine suspension and debarment status by: (a) Checking SAM (System for Award Management) Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should comply with the guidance in "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the "Internal Control-Integrated Framework," issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: During our testing, we noted the School Board did not have adequate internal controls designed to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None Noted Context: The School Board could not provide documentation for two out of four vendors regarding ensuring the vendor was not suspended or debarred at the time of contract. Cause: The Board’s procedures and internal controls over suspension and debarment were not sufficient to ensure that all vendors’ suspension and debarment status was verified timely. Effect: Failure to verify the suspension and debarment status of vendors may result in the procurement of goods or services from vendors that are suspended or debarred and result in unallowable expenditures charged to the program. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the Board review its policies and procedures to ensure they include the three options for determining suspension and debarment status listed in 2 CFR 180.300 and that controls are sufficient to ensure that the suspension and debarment status is verified for all vendors prior to entering into covered transactions. Views of responsible officials: Management acknowledges the finding. Current procedures mandate suspension and debarment verification prior to entering into contracts or agreements with vendors. However, due to the timing of the policy implementation, there were vendor contracts executed and payments processed after the prior year's finding but before corrective action could be implemented.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 and 84.173 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H027A220035 Pass-Through Agency: Maryland State Department of Education Pass-Through Number: 231072 Award Period: 10/1/2022 - 9/30/2024 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Control over Compliance, Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion) Criteria or Specific Requirement: Compliance: Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. 2 CFR 180.300 states that an entity may determine suspension and debarment status by: (a) Checking SAM (System for Award Management) Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should comply with the guidance in "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the "Internal Control-Integrated Framework," issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: During our testing, we noted the School Board did not have adequate internal controls designed to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None Noted Context: The School Board could not provide documentation for two out of four vendors regarding ensuring the vendor was not suspended or debarred at the time of contract. Cause: The Board’s procedures and internal controls over suspension and debarment were not sufficient to ensure that all vendors’ suspension and debarment status was verified timely. Effect: Failure to verify the suspension and debarment status of vendors may result in the procurement of goods or services from vendors that are suspended or debarred and result in unallowable expenditures charged to the program. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the Board review its policies and procedures to ensure they include the three options for determining suspension and debarment status listed in 2 CFR 180.300 and that controls are sufficient to ensure that the suspension and debarment status is verified for all vendors prior to entering into covered transactions. Views of responsible officials: Management acknowledges the finding. Current procedures mandate suspension and debarment verification prior to entering into contracts or agreements with vendors. However, due to the timing of the policy implementation, there were vendor contracts executed and payments processed after the prior year's finding but before corrective action could be implemented.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 and 84.173 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H027A220035 Pass-Through Agency: Maryland State Department of Education Pass-Through Number: 231072 Award Period: 10/1/2022 - 9/30/2024 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Control over Compliance, Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion) Criteria or Specific Requirement: Compliance: Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. 2 CFR 180.300 states that an entity may determine suspension and debarment status by: (a) Checking SAM (System for Award Management) Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should comply with the guidance in "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the "Internal Control-Integrated Framework," issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: During our testing, we noted the School Board did not have adequate internal controls designed to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None Noted Context: The School Board could not provide documentation for two out of four vendors regarding ensuring the vendor was not suspended or debarred at the time of contract. Cause: The Board’s procedures and internal controls over suspension and debarment were not sufficient to ensure that all vendors’ suspension and debarment status was verified timely. Effect: Failure to verify the suspension and debarment status of vendors may result in the procurement of goods or services from vendors that are suspended or debarred and result in unallowable expenditures charged to the program. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the Board review its policies and procedures to ensure they include the three options for determining suspension and debarment status listed in 2 CFR 180.300 and that controls are sufficient to ensure that the suspension and debarment status is verified for all vendors prior to entering into covered transactions. Views of responsible officials: Management acknowledges the finding. Current procedures mandate suspension and debarment verification prior to entering into contracts or agreements with vendors. However, due to the timing of the policy implementation, there were vendor contracts executed and payments processed after the prior year's finding but before corrective action could be implemented.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 and 84.173 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H027A220035 Pass-Through Agency: Maryland State Department of Education Pass-Through Number: 231072 Award Period: 10/1/2022 - 9/30/2024 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Control over Compliance, Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion) Criteria or Specific Requirement: Compliance: Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. 2 CFR 180.300 states that an entity may determine suspension and debarment status by: (a) Checking SAM (System for Award Management) Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should comply with the guidance in "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the "Internal Control-Integrated Framework," issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: During our testing, we noted the School Board did not have adequate internal controls designed to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None Noted Context: The School Board could not provide documentation for two out of four vendors regarding ensuring the vendor was not suspended or debarred at the time of contract. Cause: The Board’s procedures and internal controls over suspension and debarment were not sufficient to ensure that all vendors’ suspension and debarment status was verified timely. Effect: Failure to verify the suspension and debarment status of vendors may result in the procurement of goods or services from vendors that are suspended or debarred and result in unallowable expenditures charged to the program. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the Board review its policies and procedures to ensure they include the three options for determining suspension and debarment status listed in 2 CFR 180.300 and that controls are sufficient to ensure that the suspension and debarment status is verified for all vendors prior to entering into covered transactions. Views of responsible officials: Management acknowledges the finding. Current procedures mandate suspension and debarment verification prior to entering into contracts or agreements with vendors. However, due to the timing of the policy implementation, there were vendor contracts executed and payments processed after the prior year's finding but before corrective action could be implemented.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 and 84.173 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H027A220035 Pass-Through Agency: Maryland State Department of Education Pass-Through Number: 231072 Award Period: 10/1/2022 - 9/30/2024 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Control over Compliance, Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion) Criteria or Specific Requirement: Compliance: Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. 2 CFR 180.300 states that an entity may determine suspension and debarment status by: (a) Checking SAM (System for Award Management) Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should comply with the guidance in "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the "Internal Control-Integrated Framework," issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: During our testing, we noted the School Board did not have adequate internal controls designed to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None Noted Context: The School Board could not provide documentation for two out of four vendors regarding ensuring the vendor was not suspended or debarred at the time of contract. Cause: The Board’s procedures and internal controls over suspension and debarment were not sufficient to ensure that all vendors’ suspension and debarment status was verified timely. Effect: Failure to verify the suspension and debarment status of vendors may result in the procurement of goods or services from vendors that are suspended or debarred and result in unallowable expenditures charged to the program. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the Board review its policies and procedures to ensure they include the three options for determining suspension and debarment status listed in 2 CFR 180.300 and that controls are sufficient to ensure that the suspension and debarment status is verified for all vendors prior to entering into covered transactions. Views of responsible officials: Management acknowledges the finding. Current procedures mandate suspension and debarment verification prior to entering into contracts or agreements with vendors. However, due to the timing of the policy implementation, there were vendor contracts executed and payments processed after the prior year's finding but before corrective action could be implemented.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 and 84.173 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H027A220035 Pass-Through Agency: Maryland State Department of Education Pass-Through Number: 231072 Award Period: 10/1/2022 - 9/30/2024 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Control over Compliance, Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion) Criteria or Specific Requirement: Compliance: Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. 2 CFR 180.300 states that an entity may determine suspension and debarment status by: (a) Checking SAM (System for Award Management) Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should comply with the guidance in "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the "Internal Control-Integrated Framework," issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: During our testing, we noted the School Board did not have adequate internal controls designed to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None Noted Context: The School Board could not provide documentation for two out of four vendors regarding ensuring the vendor was not suspended or debarred at the time of contract. Cause: The Board’s procedures and internal controls over suspension and debarment were not sufficient to ensure that all vendors’ suspension and debarment status was verified timely. Effect: Failure to verify the suspension and debarment status of vendors may result in the procurement of goods or services from vendors that are suspended or debarred and result in unallowable expenditures charged to the program. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the Board review its policies and procedures to ensure they include the three options for determining suspension and debarment status listed in 2 CFR 180.300 and that controls are sufficient to ensure that the suspension and debarment status is verified for all vendors prior to entering into covered transactions. Views of responsible officials: Management acknowledges the finding. Current procedures mandate suspension and debarment verification prior to entering into contracts or agreements with vendors. However, due to the timing of the policy implementation, there were vendor contracts executed and payments processed after the prior year's finding but before corrective action could be implemented.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 and 84.173 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H027A220035 Pass-Through Agency: Maryland State Department of Education Pass-Through Number: 231072 Award Period: 10/1/2022 - 9/30/2024 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Control over Compliance, Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion) Criteria or Specific Requirement: Compliance: Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. 2 CFR 180.300 states that an entity may determine suspension and debarment status by: (a) Checking SAM (System for Award Management) Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should comply with the guidance in "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the "Internal Control-Integrated Framework," issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: During our testing, we noted the School Board did not have adequate internal controls designed to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None Noted Context: The School Board could not provide documentation for two out of four vendors regarding ensuring the vendor was not suspended or debarred at the time of contract. Cause: The Board’s procedures and internal controls over suspension and debarment were not sufficient to ensure that all vendors’ suspension and debarment status was verified timely. Effect: Failure to verify the suspension and debarment status of vendors may result in the procurement of goods or services from vendors that are suspended or debarred and result in unallowable expenditures charged to the program. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the Board review its policies and procedures to ensure they include the three options for determining suspension and debarment status listed in 2 CFR 180.300 and that controls are sufficient to ensure that the suspension and debarment status is verified for all vendors prior to entering into covered transactions. Views of responsible officials: Management acknowledges the finding. Current procedures mandate suspension and debarment verification prior to entering into contracts or agreements with vendors. However, due to the timing of the policy implementation, there were vendor contracts executed and payments processed after the prior year's finding but before corrective action could be implemented.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 and 84.173 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H027A220035 Pass-Through Agency: Maryland State Department of Education Pass-Through Number: 231072 Award Period: 10/1/2022 - 9/30/2024 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Control over Compliance, Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion) Criteria or Specific Requirement: Compliance: Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. 2 CFR 180.300 states that an entity may determine suspension and debarment status by: (a) Checking SAM (System for Award Management) Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should comply with the guidance in "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the "Internal Control-Integrated Framework," issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: During our testing, we noted the School Board did not have adequate internal controls designed to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None Noted Context: The School Board could not provide documentation for two out of four vendors regarding ensuring the vendor was not suspended or debarred at the time of contract. Cause: The Board’s procedures and internal controls over suspension and debarment were not sufficient to ensure that all vendors’ suspension and debarment status was verified timely. Effect: Failure to verify the suspension and debarment status of vendors may result in the procurement of goods or services from vendors that are suspended or debarred and result in unallowable expenditures charged to the program. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the Board review its policies and procedures to ensure they include the three options for determining suspension and debarment status listed in 2 CFR 180.300 and that controls are sufficient to ensure that the suspension and debarment status is verified for all vendors prior to entering into covered transactions. Views of responsible officials: Management acknowledges the finding. Current procedures mandate suspension and debarment verification prior to entering into contracts or agreements with vendors. However, due to the timing of the policy implementation, there were vendor contracts executed and payments processed after the prior year's finding but before corrective action could be implemented.