Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: Assistance Listing Number 84.425, Department of Education, Education Stabilization Fund Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 213716 Pass-through Entity – Michigan Department of Education Finding Type – Material weakness in internal control over compliance Repeat Finding - No Criteria – Per 2 CFR § 200.303, The non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition – During our testing for Cash Management, it was noted that 1 out of 1 drawdown request selected for testing did not have evidence of review and approval. Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed – N/A Questioned Costs – None Cause – Management did not fully implement their internal control policies and procedures as there was no evidence of review and approvals, nor was documentation retained. Effect – Drawdown requests did not have evidence of review and approval. Recommendation – We recommend that management review its procedures and controls in place to ensure that reports and supporting documentation are retained and have proper evidence of review and approval. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: Assistance Listing Number 84.425, Department of Education, Education Stabilization Fund Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 213716 Pass-through Entity – Michigan Department of Education Finding Type – Material weakness in internal control over compliance Repeat Finding - No Criteria – Per 2 CFR § 200.303, The non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition – During our testing for Reporting, it was noted that 1 out of 1 report selected for testing did not have evidence of review and approval. Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed – N/A Questioned Costs – None Cause – Management did not fully implement their internal control policies and procedures as there was no evidence of review and approvals, nor was documentation retained. Effect – Reports did not have evidence of review and approval. Recommendation – We recommend that management review its procedures and controls in place to ensure that reports and supporting documentation are retained and have proper evidence of review and approval. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: Assistance Listing Number 84.425, Department of Education, Education Stabilization Fund Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 213716 Pass-through Entity – Michigan Department of Education Finding Type – Material weakness in internal control over compliance Repeat Finding - No Criteria – Per 2 CFR § 200.303, The non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition – During our testing for Cash Management, it was noted that 1 out of 1 drawdown request selected for testing did not have evidence of review and approval. Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed – N/A Questioned Costs – None Cause – Management did not fully implement their internal control policies and procedures as there was no evidence of review and approvals, nor was documentation retained. Effect – Drawdown requests did not have evidence of review and approval. Recommendation – We recommend that management review its procedures and controls in place to ensure that reports and supporting documentation are retained and have proper evidence of review and approval. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: Assistance Listing Number 84.425, Department of Education, Education Stabilization Fund Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 213716 Pass-through Entity – Michigan Department of Education Finding Type – Material weakness in internal control over compliance Repeat Finding - No Criteria – Per 2 CFR § 200.303, The non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition – During our testing for Reporting, it was noted that 1 out of 1 report selected for testing did not have evidence of review and approval. Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed – N/A Questioned Costs – None Cause – Management did not fully implement their internal control policies and procedures as there was no evidence of review and approvals, nor was documentation retained. Effect – Reports did not have evidence of review and approval. Recommendation – We recommend that management review its procedures and controls in place to ensure that reports and supporting documentation are retained and have proper evidence of review and approval. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: Assistance Listing Number 84.425, Department of Education, Education Stabilization Fund Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 213716 Pass-through Entity – Michigan Department of Education Finding Type – Material weakness in internal control over compliance Repeat Finding - No Criteria – Per 2 CFR § 200.303, The non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition – During our testing for Cash Management, it was noted that 1 out of 1 drawdown request selected for testing did not have evidence of review and approval. Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed – N/A Questioned Costs – None Cause – Management did not fully implement their internal control policies and procedures as there was no evidence of review and approvals, nor was documentation retained. Effect – Drawdown requests did not have evidence of review and approval. Recommendation – We recommend that management review its procedures and controls in place to ensure that reports and supporting documentation are retained and have proper evidence of review and approval. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: Assistance Listing Number 84.425, Department of Education, Education Stabilization Fund Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 213716 Pass-through Entity – Michigan Department of Education Finding Type – Material weakness in internal control over compliance Repeat Finding - No Criteria – Per 2 CFR § 200.303, The non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition – During our testing for Reporting, it was noted that 1 out of 1 report selected for testing did not have evidence of review and approval. Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed – N/A Questioned Costs – None Cause – Management did not fully implement their internal control policies and procedures as there was no evidence of review and approvals, nor was documentation retained. Effect – Reports did not have evidence of review and approval. Recommendation – We recommend that management review its procedures and controls in place to ensure that reports and supporting documentation are retained and have proper evidence of review and approval. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: Assistance Listing Number 84.010A, Department of Education, Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 231530 and 241530 Pass-through Entity – Wayne County Regional Educational Service Agency Finding Type – Material weakness in internal control over compliance Repeat Finding - No Criteria – Per 2 CFR § 200.303, The non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition – During our testing for Cash Management, it was noted that 4 out of 4 drawdowns request selected for testing did not have evidence of review and approval. Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed – N/A Questioned Costs – None Cause – Management did not fully implement their internal control policies and procedures as there was no evidence of review and approvals, nor was documentation retained. Effect – Drawdown requests did not have evidence of review and approval. Recommendation – We recommend that management review its procedures and controls in place to ensure that reports and supporting documentation are retained and have proper evidence of review and approval. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: Assistance Listing Number 84.010A, Department of Education, Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 231530 and 241530 Pass-through Entity – Wayne County Regional Educational Service Agency Finding Type – Material weakness in internal control over compliance Repeat Finding – No Criteria – Per 2 CFR § 200.303, The non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition – During our testing for Reporting, it was noted that 1 out of 1 report selected for testing did not have evidence of review and approval. Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed – N/A Questioned Costs – None Cause – Management did not fully implement their internal control policies and procedures as there was no evidence of review and approvals, nor was documentation retained. Effect – Reports did not have evidence of review and approval. Recommendation – We recommend that management review its procedures and controls in place to ensure that reports and supporting documentation are retained and have proper evidence of review and approval. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: Assistance Listing Number 84.010A, Department of Education, Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 231530 and 241530 Pass-through Entity – Wayne County Regional Educational Service Agency Finding Type – Material weakness in internal control over compliance Repeat Finding – No Criteria – Per 2 CFR § 200.303, The non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition – During our testing for Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, it was noted that 2 out of 16 personnel selected for payroll testing were not included in the Academy’s – Grant Funded Staff Listing. In addition, we noted that for 1 out of 16 personnel selected for testing, there was no evidence of review or approval of colleague assignment letter. Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed – N/A Questioned Costs – None Cause – Management did not fully implement their internal control policies and procedures as there was no evidence of review and approvals, nor was documentation retained. Effect – Reports did not have evidence of review and approval. Recommendation – We recommend that management review its procedures and controls in place to ensure that reports and supporting documentation are retained and have proper evidence of review and approval. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: Assistance Listing Number 84.010A, Department of Education, Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 231530 and 241530 Pass-through Entity – Wayne County Regional Educational Service Agency Finding Type – Material weakness in internal control over compliance Repeat Finding - No Criteria – Per 2 CFR § 200.303, The non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition – During our testing for Cash Management, it was noted that 4 out of 4 drawdowns request selected for testing did not have evidence of review and approval. Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed – N/A Questioned Costs – None Cause – Management did not fully implement their internal control policies and procedures as there was no evidence of review and approvals, nor was documentation retained. Effect – Drawdown requests did not have evidence of review and approval. Recommendation – We recommend that management review its procedures and controls in place to ensure that reports and supporting documentation are retained and have proper evidence of review and approval. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: Assistance Listing Number 84.010A, Department of Education, Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 231530 and 241530 Pass-through Entity – Wayne County Regional Educational Service Agency Finding Type – Material weakness in internal control over compliance Repeat Finding – No Criteria – Per 2 CFR § 200.303, The non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition – During our testing for Reporting, it was noted that 1 out of 1 report selected for testing did not have evidence of review and approval. Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed – N/A Questioned Costs – None Cause – Management did not fully implement their internal control policies and procedures as there was no evidence of review and approvals, nor was documentation retained. Effect – Reports did not have evidence of review and approval. Recommendation – We recommend that management review its procedures and controls in place to ensure that reports and supporting documentation are retained and have proper evidence of review and approval. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: Assistance Listing Number 84.010A, Department of Education, Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 231530 and 241530 Pass-through Entity – Wayne County Regional Educational Service Agency Finding Type – Material weakness in internal control over compliance Repeat Finding – No Criteria – Per 2 CFR § 200.303, The non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition – During our testing for Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, it was noted that 2 out of 16 personnel selected for payroll testing were not included in the Academy’s – Grant Funded Staff Listing. In addition, we noted that for 1 out of 16 personnel selected for testing, there was no evidence of review or approval of colleague assignment letter. Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed – N/A Questioned Costs – None Cause – Management did not fully implement their internal control policies and procedures as there was no evidence of review and approvals, nor was documentation retained. Effect – Reports did not have evidence of review and approval. Recommendation – We recommend that management review its procedures and controls in place to ensure that reports and supporting documentation are retained and have proper evidence of review and approval. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: Assistance Listing Number 84.010A, Department of Education, Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 231530 and 241530 Pass-through Entity – Wayne County Regional Educational Service Agency Finding Type – Material weakness in internal control over compliance Repeat Finding - No Criteria – Per 2 CFR § 200.303, The non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition – During our testing for Cash Management, it was noted that 4 out of 4 drawdowns request selected for testing did not have evidence of review and approval. Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed – N/A Questioned Costs – None Cause – Management did not fully implement their internal control policies and procedures as there was no evidence of review and approvals, nor was documentation retained. Effect – Drawdown requests did not have evidence of review and approval. Recommendation – We recommend that management review its procedures and controls in place to ensure that reports and supporting documentation are retained and have proper evidence of review and approval. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: Assistance Listing Number 84.010A, Department of Education, Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 231530 and 241530 Pass-through Entity – Wayne County Regional Educational Service Agency Finding Type – Material weakness in internal control over compliance Repeat Finding – No Criteria – Per 2 CFR § 200.303, The non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition – During our testing for Reporting, it was noted that 1 out of 1 report selected for testing did not have evidence of review and approval. Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed – N/A Questioned Costs – None Cause – Management did not fully implement their internal control policies and procedures as there was no evidence of review and approvals, nor was documentation retained. Effect – Reports did not have evidence of review and approval. Recommendation – We recommend that management review its procedures and controls in place to ensure that reports and supporting documentation are retained and have proper evidence of review and approval. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: Assistance Listing Number 84.010A, Department of Education, Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 231530 and 241530 Pass-through Entity – Wayne County Regional Educational Service Agency Finding Type – Material weakness in internal control over compliance Repeat Finding – No Criteria – Per 2 CFR § 200.303, The non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition – During our testing for Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, it was noted that 2 out of 16 personnel selected for payroll testing were not included in the Academy’s – Grant Funded Staff Listing. In addition, we noted that for 1 out of 16 personnel selected for testing, there was no evidence of review or approval of colleague assignment letter. Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed – N/A Questioned Costs – None Cause – Management did not fully implement their internal control policies and procedures as there was no evidence of review and approvals, nor was documentation retained. Effect – Reports did not have evidence of review and approval. Recommendation – We recommend that management review its procedures and controls in place to ensure that reports and supporting documentation are retained and have proper evidence of review and approval. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: Assistance Listing Number 84.425, Department of Education, Education Stabilization Fund Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 213713 Pass-through Entity – Michigan Department of Education Finding Type – Material weakness in internal control over compliance Repeat Finding - No Criteria – Per 2 CFR § 200.303, The non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition – During our testing for Cash Management, it was noted that 4 out of 4 drawdown requests selected for testing did not have evidence of review and approval. Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed – N/A Questioned Costs – None Cause – Management did not fully implement their internal control policies and procedures as there was no evidence of review and approvals, nor was documentation retained. Effect – Drawdown requests did not have evidence of review and approval. Recommendation – We recommend that management review its procedures and controls in place to ensure that reports and supporting documentation are retained and have proper evidence of review and approval. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: Assistance Listing Number 84.425, Department of Education, Education Stabilization Fund Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 213713 Pass-through Entity – Michigan Department of Education Finding Type – Material weakness in internal control over compliance Repeat Finding – No Criteria – Per 2 CFR § 200.303, The non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition – During our testing for Reporting, it was noted that 1 out of 1 report selected for testing did not have evidence of review and approval. In addition, the report was not submitted within the required time frame as required by the grant agreement. Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed – N/A Questioned Costs – None Cause – Management did not fully implement their internal control policies and procedures as there was no evidence of review and approvals, nor was documentation retained. Effect – Report did not have evidence of review and approval. Recommendation – We recommend that management review its procedures and controls in place to ensure that reports and supporting documentation are retained and have proper evidence of review and approval. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Finding Type – Material weakness in internal control over compliance Repeat Finding - No Criteria – Per 2 CFR § 200.303, The non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition – During our testing for Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, it was noted that 7 out of 17 personnel selected for payroll testing were not included in the Academy’s – Grant Funded Staff Listing. In addition, we noted that for 8 out of 17 personnel selected for testing, there was no evidence of review or approval of colleague assignment letter. Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed – N/A Questioned Costs – None Cause – Management did not fully implement their internal control policies and procedures as there was no evidence of review and approvals, nor was documentation retained. Effect – Reports did not have evidence of review and approval. Recommendation – We recommend that management review its procedures and controls in place to ensure that reports and supporting documentation are retained and have proper evidence of review and approval. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: Assistance Listing Number 84.425, Department of Education, Education Stabilization Fund Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 213713 Pass-through Entity – Michigan Department of Education Finding Type – Material weakness in internal control over compliance Repeat Finding - No Criteria – Per 2 CFR § 200.303, The non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition – During our testing for Cash Management, it was noted that 4 out of 4 drawdown requests selected for testing did not have evidence of review and approval. Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed – N/A Questioned Costs – None Cause – Management did not fully implement their internal control policies and procedures as there was no evidence of review and approvals, nor was documentation retained. Effect – Drawdown requests did not have evidence of review and approval. Recommendation – We recommend that management review its procedures and controls in place to ensure that reports and supporting documentation are retained and have proper evidence of review and approval. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: Assistance Listing Number 84.425, Department of Education, Education Stabilization Fund Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 213713 Pass-through Entity – Michigan Department of Education Finding Type – Material weakness in internal control over compliance Repeat Finding – No Criteria – Per 2 CFR § 200.303, The non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition – During our testing for Reporting, it was noted that 1 out of 1 report selected for testing did not have evidence of review and approval. In addition, the report was not submitted within the required time frame as required by the grant agreement. Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed – N/A Questioned Costs – None Cause – Management did not fully implement their internal control policies and procedures as there was no evidence of review and approvals, nor was documentation retained. Effect – Report did not have evidence of review and approval. Recommendation – We recommend that management review its procedures and controls in place to ensure that reports and supporting documentation are retained and have proper evidence of review and approval. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Finding Type – Material weakness in internal control over compliance Repeat Finding - No Criteria – Per 2 CFR § 200.303, The non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition – During our testing for Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, it was noted that 7 out of 17 personnel selected for payroll testing were not included in the Academy’s – Grant Funded Staff Listing. In addition, we noted that for 8 out of 17 personnel selected for testing, there was no evidence of review or approval of colleague assignment letter. Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed – N/A Questioned Costs – None Cause – Management did not fully implement their internal control policies and procedures as there was no evidence of review and approvals, nor was documentation retained. Effect – Reports did not have evidence of review and approval. Recommendation – We recommend that management review its procedures and controls in place to ensure that reports and supporting documentation are retained and have proper evidence of review and approval. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: Assistance Listing Number 84.425, Department of Education, Education Stabilization Fund Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 213713 Pass-through Entity – Michigan Department of Education Finding Type – Material weakness in internal control over compliance Repeat Finding - No Criteria – Per 2 CFR § 200.303, The non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition – During our testing for Cash Management, it was noted that 4 out of 4 drawdown requests selected for testing did not have evidence of review and approval. Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed – N/A Questioned Costs – None Cause – Management did not fully implement their internal control policies and procedures as there was no evidence of review and approvals, nor was documentation retained. Effect – Drawdown requests did not have evidence of review and approval. Recommendation – We recommend that management review its procedures and controls in place to ensure that reports and supporting documentation are retained and have proper evidence of review and approval. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: Assistance Listing Number 84.425, Department of Education, Education Stabilization Fund Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 213713 Pass-through Entity – Michigan Department of Education Finding Type – Material weakness in internal control over compliance Repeat Finding – No Criteria – Per 2 CFR § 200.303, The non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition – During our testing for Reporting, it was noted that 1 out of 1 report selected for testing did not have evidence of review and approval. In addition, the report was not submitted within the required time frame as required by the grant agreement. Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed – N/A Questioned Costs – None Cause – Management did not fully implement their internal control policies and procedures as there was no evidence of review and approvals, nor was documentation retained. Effect – Report did not have evidence of review and approval. Recommendation – We recommend that management review its procedures and controls in place to ensure that reports and supporting documentation are retained and have proper evidence of review and approval. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Finding Type – Material weakness in internal control over compliance Repeat Finding - No Criteria – Per 2 CFR § 200.303, The non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition – During our testing for Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, it was noted that 7 out of 17 personnel selected for payroll testing were not included in the Academy’s – Grant Funded Staff Listing. In addition, we noted that for 8 out of 17 personnel selected for testing, there was no evidence of review or approval of colleague assignment letter. Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed – N/A Questioned Costs – None Cause – Management did not fully implement their internal control policies and procedures as there was no evidence of review and approvals, nor was documentation retained. Effect – Reports did not have evidence of review and approval. Recommendation – We recommend that management review its procedures and controls in place to ensure that reports and supporting documentation are retained and have proper evidence of review and approval. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: Assistance Listing Number 84.425, Department of Education, Education Stabilization Fund Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 213713 Pass-through Entity – Michigan Department of Education Finding Type – Material weakness in internal control over compliance Repeat Finding - No Criteria – Per 2 CFR § 200.303, The non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition – During our testing for Cash Management, it was noted that 4 out of 4 drawdown requests selected for testing did not have evidence of review and approval. Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed – N/A Questioned Costs – None Cause – Management did not fully implement their internal control policies and procedures as there was no evidence of review and approvals, nor was documentation retained. Effect – Drawdown requests did not have evidence of review and approval. Recommendation – We recommend that management review its procedures and controls in place to ensure that reports and supporting documentation are retained and have proper evidence of review and approval. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: Assistance Listing Number 84.425, Department of Education, Education Stabilization Fund Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 213713 Pass-through Entity – Michigan Department of Education Finding Type – Material weakness in internal control over compliance Repeat Finding – No Criteria – Per 2 CFR § 200.303, The non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition – During our testing for Reporting, it was noted that 1 out of 1 report selected for testing did not have evidence of review and approval. In addition, the report was not submitted within the required time frame as required by the grant agreement. Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed – N/A Questioned Costs – None Cause – Management did not fully implement their internal control policies and procedures as there was no evidence of review and approvals, nor was documentation retained. Effect – Report did not have evidence of review and approval. Recommendation – We recommend that management review its procedures and controls in place to ensure that reports and supporting documentation are retained and have proper evidence of review and approval. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Finding Type – Material weakness in internal control over compliance Repeat Finding - No Criteria – Per 2 CFR § 200.303, The non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition – During our testing for Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, it was noted that 7 out of 17 personnel selected for payroll testing were not included in the Academy’s – Grant Funded Staff Listing. In addition, we noted that for 8 out of 17 personnel selected for testing, there was no evidence of review or approval of colleague assignment letter. Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed – N/A Questioned Costs – None Cause – Management did not fully implement their internal control policies and procedures as there was no evidence of review and approvals, nor was documentation retained. Effect – Reports did not have evidence of review and approval. Recommendation – We recommend that management review its procedures and controls in place to ensure that reports and supporting documentation are retained and have proper evidence of review and approval. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Federal Agency: U.S Department of Education Federal Program Name: Student Financial Assistance Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.063 & 84.268 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: P063P242488 – 2024 & P268K242488 – 2024 Award Period: July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matter Criteria or specific requirement: Institutions are required to report enrollment information, as prescribed by the Secretary of Education under the Pell grant and the Direct loan program via the NSLDS (OMB No. 1845-0035; Pell, 34 CFR 690.83(b)(2); Direct Loan, 34 CFR 685.309). The District is required to design and implement internal controls to ensure compliance with such provisions (2 CRF 200.303). Condition: During our testing, we noted that one of 60 students selected for testing did not have their enrollment properly reported to NSLDS. Questioned costs: There are no questioned costs. Context: A statistically valid sample of 60 students was selected for testing of the institutional enrollment records for comparison to NSLDS records, as required by the Department of Education. One student was found to be omitted from the 2024 enrollment reports. Cause: One student selected for testing was excluded from District’s term reporting as a result of parameters built into the program selection form (Primary Program GT eForm). District reporting parameters are established to include all students that have a Primary program selected on this form. If no Primary program is selected, all active programs automatically receive a Secondary designation, which results in exclusion from reporting. As a result of only having Secondary designations, one student selected for testing was omitted from reporting to NSC. Effect: There is a risk that students have the incorrect enrollment status, which can result in incomplete records available to users for the student. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the College rebuilds the ‘Primary Program GT eForm’ to include a check that verifies all programs are not designated as Secondary. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: U.S Department of Education Federal Program Name: Student Financial Assistance Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.063 & 84.268 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: P063P242488 – 2024 & P268K242488 – 2024 Award Period: July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matter Criteria or specific requirement: Institutions are required to report enrollment information, as prescribed by the Secretary of Education under the Pell grant and the Direct loan program via the NSLDS (OMB No. 1845-0035; Pell, 34 CFR 690.83(b)(2); Direct Loan, 34 CFR 685.309). The District is required to design and implement internal controls to ensure compliance with such provisions (2 CRF 200.303). Condition: During our testing, we noted that one of 60 students selected for testing did not have their enrollment properly reported to NSLDS. Questioned costs: There are no questioned costs. Context: A statistically valid sample of 60 students was selected for testing of the institutional enrollment records for comparison to NSLDS records, as required by the Department of Education. One student was found to be omitted from the 2024 enrollment reports. Cause: One student selected for testing was excluded from District’s term reporting as a result of parameters built into the program selection form (Primary Program GT eForm). District reporting parameters are established to include all students that have a Primary program selected on this form. If no Primary program is selected, all active programs automatically receive a Secondary designation, which results in exclusion from reporting. As a result of only having Secondary designations, one student selected for testing was omitted from reporting to NSC. Effect: There is a risk that students have the incorrect enrollment status, which can result in incomplete records available to users for the student. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the College rebuilds the ‘Primary Program GT eForm’ to include a check that verifies all programs are not designated as Secondary. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: U.S Department of Education Federal Program Name: Student Financial Assistance Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.063 & 84.268 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: P063P242488 – 2024 & P268K242488 – 2024 Award Period: July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matter Criteria or specific requirement: Institutions are required to report enrollment information, as prescribed by the Secretary of Education under the Pell grant and the Direct loan program via the NSLDS (OMB No. 1845-0035; Pell, 34 CFR 690.83(b)(2); Direct Loan, 34 CFR 685.309). The District is required to design and implement internal controls to ensure compliance with such provisions (2 CRF 200.303). Condition: During our testing, we noted that one of 60 students selected for testing did not have their enrollment properly reported to NSLDS. Questioned costs: There are no questioned costs. Context: A statistically valid sample of 60 students was selected for testing of the institutional enrollment records for comparison to NSLDS records, as required by the Department of Education. One student was found to be omitted from the 2024 enrollment reports. Cause: One student selected for testing was excluded from District’s term reporting as a result of parameters built into the program selection form (Primary Program GT eForm). District reporting parameters are established to include all students that have a Primary program selected on this form. If no Primary program is selected, all active programs automatically receive a Secondary designation, which results in exclusion from reporting. As a result of only having Secondary designations, one student selected for testing was omitted from reporting to NSC. Effect: There is a risk that students have the incorrect enrollment status, which can result in incomplete records available to users for the student. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the College rebuilds the ‘Primary Program GT eForm’ to include a check that verifies all programs are not designated as Secondary. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: U.S Department of Education Federal Program Name: Student Financial Assistance Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.063 & 84.268 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: P063P242488 – 2024 & P268K242488 – 2024 Award Period: July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matter Criteria or specific requirement: Institutions are required to report enrollment information, as prescribed by the Secretary of Education under the Pell grant and the Direct loan program via the NSLDS (OMB No. 1845-0035; Pell, 34 CFR 690.83(b)(2); Direct Loan, 34 CFR 685.309). The District is required to design and implement internal controls to ensure compliance with such provisions (2 CRF 200.303). Condition: During our testing, we noted that one of 60 students selected for testing did not have their enrollment properly reported to NSLDS. Questioned costs: There are no questioned costs. Context: A statistically valid sample of 60 students was selected for testing of the institutional enrollment records for comparison to NSLDS records, as required by the Department of Education. One student was found to be omitted from the 2024 enrollment reports. Cause: One student selected for testing was excluded from District’s term reporting as a result of parameters built into the program selection form (Primary Program GT eForm). District reporting parameters are established to include all students that have a Primary program selected on this form. If no Primary program is selected, all active programs automatically receive a Secondary designation, which results in exclusion from reporting. As a result of only having Secondary designations, one student selected for testing was omitted from reporting to NSC. Effect: There is a risk that students have the incorrect enrollment status, which can result in incomplete records available to users for the student. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the College rebuilds the ‘Primary Program GT eForm’ to include a check that verifies all programs are not designated as Secondary. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: U.S Department of Education Federal Program Name: Student Financial Assistance Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.063 & 84.268 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: P063P242488 – 2024 & P268K242488 – 2024 Award Period: July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matter Criteria or specific requirement: Institutions are required to report enrollment information, as prescribed by the Secretary of Education under the Pell grant and the Direct loan program via the NSLDS (OMB No. 1845-0035; Pell, 34 CFR 690.83(b)(2); Direct Loan, 34 CFR 685.309). The District is required to design and implement internal controls to ensure compliance with such provisions (2 CRF 200.303). Condition: During our testing, we noted that one of 60 students selected for testing did not have their enrollment properly reported to NSLDS. Questioned costs: There are no questioned costs. Context: A statistically valid sample of 60 students was selected for testing of the institutional enrollment records for comparison to NSLDS records, as required by the Department of Education. One student was found to be omitted from the 2024 enrollment reports. Cause: One student selected for testing was excluded from District’s term reporting as a result of parameters built into the program selection form (Primary Program GT eForm). District reporting parameters are established to include all students that have a Primary program selected on this form. If no Primary program is selected, all active programs automatically receive a Secondary designation, which results in exclusion from reporting. As a result of only having Secondary designations, one student selected for testing was omitted from reporting to NSC. Effect: There is a risk that students have the incorrect enrollment status, which can result in incomplete records available to users for the student. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the College rebuilds the ‘Primary Program GT eForm’ to include a check that verifies all programs are not designated as Secondary. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: U.S Department of Education Federal Program Name: Student Financial Assistance Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.063 & 84.268 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: P063P242488 – 2024 & P268K242488 – 2024 Award Period: July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matter Criteria or specific requirement: Institutions are required to report enrollment information, as prescribed by the Secretary of Education under the Pell grant and the Direct loan program via the NSLDS (OMB No. 1845-0035; Pell, 34 CFR 690.83(b)(2); Direct Loan, 34 CFR 685.309). The District is required to design and implement internal controls to ensure compliance with such provisions (2 CRF 200.303). Condition: During our testing, we noted that one of 60 students selected for testing did not have their enrollment properly reported to NSLDS. Questioned costs: There are no questioned costs. Context: A statistically valid sample of 60 students was selected for testing of the institutional enrollment records for comparison to NSLDS records, as required by the Department of Education. One student was found to be omitted from the 2024 enrollment reports. Cause: One student selected for testing was excluded from District’s term reporting as a result of parameters built into the program selection form (Primary Program GT eForm). District reporting parameters are established to include all students that have a Primary program selected on this form. If no Primary program is selected, all active programs automatically receive a Secondary designation, which results in exclusion from reporting. As a result of only having Secondary designations, one student selected for testing was omitted from reporting to NSC. Effect: There is a risk that students have the incorrect enrollment status, which can result in incomplete records available to users for the student. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the College rebuilds the ‘Primary Program GT eForm’ to include a check that verifies all programs are not designated as Secondary. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: U.S Department of Education Federal Program Name: Student Financial Assistance Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.063 & 84.268 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: P063P242488 – 2024 & P268K242488 – 2024 Award Period: July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matter Criteria or specific requirement: Institutions are required to report enrollment information, as prescribed by the Secretary of Education under the Pell grant and the Direct loan program via the NSLDS (OMB No. 1845-0035; Pell, 34 CFR 690.83(b)(2); Direct Loan, 34 CFR 685.309). The District is required to design and implement internal controls to ensure compliance with such provisions (2 CRF 200.303). Condition: During our testing, we noted that one of 60 students selected for testing did not have their enrollment properly reported to NSLDS. Questioned costs: There are no questioned costs. Context: A statistically valid sample of 60 students was selected for testing of the institutional enrollment records for comparison to NSLDS records, as required by the Department of Education. One student was found to be omitted from the 2024 enrollment reports. Cause: One student selected for testing was excluded from District’s term reporting as a result of parameters built into the program selection form (Primary Program GT eForm). District reporting parameters are established to include all students that have a Primary program selected on this form. If no Primary program is selected, all active programs automatically receive a Secondary designation, which results in exclusion from reporting. As a result of only having Secondary designations, one student selected for testing was omitted from reporting to NSC. Effect: There is a risk that students have the incorrect enrollment status, which can result in incomplete records available to users for the student. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the College rebuilds the ‘Primary Program GT eForm’ to include a check that verifies all programs are not designated as Secondary. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: U.S Department of Education Federal Program Name: Student Financial Assistance Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.063 & 84.268 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: P063P242488 – 2024 & P268K242488 – 2024 Award Period: July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matter Criteria or specific requirement: Institutions are required to report enrollment information, as prescribed by the Secretary of Education under the Pell grant and the Direct loan program via the NSLDS (OMB No. 1845-0035; Pell, 34 CFR 690.83(b)(2); Direct Loan, 34 CFR 685.309). The District is required to design and implement internal controls to ensure compliance with such provisions (2 CRF 200.303). Condition: During our testing, we noted that one of 60 students selected for testing did not have their enrollment properly reported to NSLDS. Questioned costs: There are no questioned costs. Context: A statistically valid sample of 60 students was selected for testing of the institutional enrollment records for comparison to NSLDS records, as required by the Department of Education. One student was found to be omitted from the 2024 enrollment reports. Cause: One student selected for testing was excluded from District’s term reporting as a result of parameters built into the program selection form (Primary Program GT eForm). District reporting parameters are established to include all students that have a Primary program selected on this form. If no Primary program is selected, all active programs automatically receive a Secondary designation, which results in exclusion from reporting. As a result of only having Secondary designations, one student selected for testing was omitted from reporting to NSC. Effect: There is a risk that students have the incorrect enrollment status, which can result in incomplete records available to users for the student. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the College rebuilds the ‘Primary Program GT eForm’ to include a check that verifies all programs are not designated as Secondary. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Finding 2024-001 Reporting - Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance Agency Department of Treasury Assistance Listing Numbers (ALN) 21.027 Program Name COVID-19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund Award Year 2022 Pass-Through Agency State of Alaska Department of Commerce, Community and Economic Development Pass-Through Entity Identifying Number AK0128 Criteria or Specific Requirement 2 CFR section 200.303 requires that non-federal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal control over the federal awards to provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards. 2 CFR section 200.514 requires auditors to obtain an understanding of the non-federal entity’s internal control over federal programs sufficient to plan the audit to support a low assessed level of control risk of noncompliance, which includes inspection of evidence of operation of those controls. Condition There was insufficient evidence retained to document operation of reporting controls, to include review or approval of the report filed. Cause This particular grant operated differently than is typical for the City, as it was not managed by a separate department. Effect or Potential Effect Information submitted to the granting agency could be incomplete or inaccurate. Questioned costs None. Context The auditor selected the annual report for testing. The report was completed and submitted by the Finance Director, but no evidence of review was maintained. The report was retained in the grant file and available for testing, and management asserts the submission was discussed at in-person meetings. The expenditures included on the report are tracked and approved separately. Identification as a repeat finding Not a repeat finding. Recommendation We recommend management retain evidence of internal control procedures around reporting to show review. Views of Responsible Officials Management agrees with this finding and has revised their policies and procedures to improve review and approval of grant reports submitted.
SIGNIFICANT DEFICENCY AND MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE Internal Controls and Report Submissions Criteria: Pursuant to the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 2 Grants and Agreements, Subpart D Post Federal Award Requirements, Section 200.303 “the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.” Also pursuant to the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 2 Grants and Agreements, Subpart D Post Federal Award Requirements, Section 200.302 Financial Management (2 CFR §200.302), “identification, in its accounts, of all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received.” Condition: When investigating the controls related to Education Stabilization Fund reporting to the State of Kanas, we became aware that the same individual compiling the information is the same submitting the reports with no secondary review. During our examination of the reports submitted for the fiscal year, the report for the quarter ending June 2024 did not back to financial records by approximately $60.989. Cause: The controls related to reporting for Education Stabilization Fund are non-existent. Effect: There is no internal control related to reporting for Education Stabilization Fund. Questioned Costs: $60,989 Recommendations: The District should have an employee compare the Board Clerk’s supporting documentation and the Education Stabilization Fund spreadsheet report before its submission to the State of Kansas for its accuracy. After the approval by the secondary review employee, the report submitted should be printed, initialed by the secondary reviewer, stapled with the information used to compile the report and combined with all financial records for the fiscal year. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The District agrees with the finding. See separate document for planned corrective actions.
Assistance Listing Numbers: All Federal Agency: All Award Numbers: All Award Year: All Pass-Through Entity: All Criteria: Non-federal entities in receipt of federal funds must comply with the requirements of 2 CFR 200.303(a), which require an entity to establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award to ensure compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. This includes properly identifying all federal awards subject to the Uniform Guidance and fairly presenting the required information in the schedule of expenditures of federal awards. Condition: Total federal expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2024 amounted to $1,095,663. Prior to the performance of financial statement audit procedures, the Organization had determined that federal expenditures during the year ended June 30, 2024 did not exceed the threshold of $750,000. Cause: The Organization did not communicate with funding contracts regarding the details of certain contracts to determine whether the amounts were subject to the Uniform Guidance and were to be included on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards. Effect: Upon financial statement audit procedures being performed, it was determined that a Single Audit was required. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend that all funding contracts are carefully reviewed to determine whether the amounts awarded represent federal funding and whether they should be classified as contractor payments or as subrecipient payments. If there is any uncertainty, we recommend that the Organization contact the funding source for clarification. We recommend that a schedule of expenditures of federal awards is prepared on an annual basis to determine if total expenditures exceed the threshold which would require a Single Audit. Views of responsible officials: The Organization concurs with the recommendations. See Corrective Action Plan.
Federal Programs: Social Services Block Grant ( ALN 93.667) and Formula Grants for Rural Areas (ALN 20.509) Finding 2024-1: Significant Deficiency. Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the allowable costs and allowable activities compliance requirements. Cause: Allocations based on timesheets were not correctly calculated and therefore the splits were not correct. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the Agency at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of effective reviews could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by the review process not ensuring there was accurate reporting of the activities of the programs. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation: Add additional reviews or calculation checks to make sure the percentage of payroll is correctly split across the various grant awards based on time spent for each grant category. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management is in agreement with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Department of Health and Human Services Federal Financial Assistance Listing 93.591, 2201SDSDVC, 2301SDSDVC, 2101SDSDC6, 2201SDSTC6 Family Violence Prevention and Services/State Domestic Violence Coalitions Procurement, Suspension, & Debarment Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must create and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.320 notes for any of the procurement methods described in the section, the recipient or subrecipient must maintain and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of the section. Condition: There were two instances where the review and approval process did not identify the correct procurement method on the procurement worksheet. The correct method was used, however was not properly documented on the Organization's internal worksheet. In addition, the contracts tested did not include some of the required provisions. Cause: The Organization’s review process did not identify the errors. Effect: Without following the established procurement procedures, it is difficult to demonstrate compliance with the federal requirements. Questioned Costs: None reported Context/Sampling: There were two contracts entered into during the current year and both were tested. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): No Recommendation: We recommend that management review the procurement procedures with applicable employees to ensure procedures are followed going forward. In addition, we suggest management review the contract process to ensure that contracts contain all required contract provisions. Views of Responsible Officials: Management is in agreement.
Department of Health and Human Services Federal Financial Assistance Listing 93.591, 2201SDSDVC, 2301SDSDVC, 2101SDSDC6, 2201SDSTC6 Family Violence Prevention and Services/State Domestic Violence Coalitions Procurement, Suspension, & Debarment Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must create and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.320 notes for any of the procurement methods described in the section, the recipient or subrecipient must maintain and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of the section. Condition: There were two instances where the review and approval process did not identify the correct procurement method on the procurement worksheet. The correct method was used, however was not properly documented on the Organization's internal worksheet. In addition, the contracts tested did not include some of the required provisions. Cause: The Organization’s review process did not identify the errors. Effect: Without following the established procurement procedures, it is difficult to demonstrate compliance with the federal requirements. Questioned Costs: None reported Context/Sampling: There were two contracts entered into during the current year and both were tested. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): No Recommendation: We recommend that management review the procurement procedures with applicable employees to ensure procedures are followed going forward. In addition, we suggest management review the contract process to ensure that contracts contain all required contract provisions. Views of Responsible Officials: Management is in agreement.
SIGNIFICANT DEFICENCY Internal Controls and Compliance Criteria: Pursuant to the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 2 Grants and Agreements, Subpart D Post Federal Award Requirements, Section 200.303 “the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal aware that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.” Condition: When investigating the controls related to equipment management, we became aware that the District has implemented an inbound procedure for recording newly purchased equipment. The current control system in place for the equipment does not include a yearly physical inventory. Cause: The internal control related to equipment maintenance after its initial receipt for Education Stabilization Fund is non-existent. Effect: There is a noncompliance and lack of internal control related to continued maintenance of the equipment for the Education Stabilization Fund. Recommendations: The District should, on at least a yearly basis, perform a physical inventory of the equipment. The procedure must be adequately recorded and disclosed to include the name of the individual performing the service, the date, condition of the equipment, and verify its location. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The District agrees with the finding. See separate document for planned corrective actions.
Name of Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Name: Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) Assistance Listing Number: 93.558 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 45732 - Year Ended June 30, 2024 Name of Pass-through Entity: North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services Criteria In accordance with 2CFR 200.303(a), Internal Controls, a non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. The specific eligibility requirements are unique to each Federal program, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Federal award pertaining to the program. Condition The Sampson County Partnership for Children did not maintain documentation for proof of income for 26 children sampled receiving funding. Cause The Organization’s internal controls over eligibility was not consistently followed to ensure that documentation for all recipients was retained. Effect or Potential Effect Lack of sufficient support over eligibility could result in ineligible individuals receiving benefits, resulting in disallowed costs for the major Federal program. Questioned Costs None. Context We selected 40 beneficiaries charged to the federal program to test compliance and controls over eligibility. Out of the 40 individuals tested, we noted 26 instances where there was no documentation to support that benefit recipients were eligible for benefits and the internal controls over eligibility were followed. Identification of Repeat Finding This finding is not a repeat finding. Recommendation We recommend that management provide training to those responsible for verifying eligibility to ensure that documentation and internal control over eligibility is maintained.
Criteria: According to 34 CFR Section 668.173 (b) and 2 CFR 200.303, the institutional portion of unearned aid must be returned to the appropriate Title IV, HEA program or Federal Family Education Loan (“FFEL”) lender no later than 45 days after the date of the institution’s determination that the student withdrew. Furthermore, the institution must determine the amount of Title IV grant or loan assistance that the student earned as of the student’s withdrawal date. The Compliance Supplement issued by the Office of Management and Budget requires auditors to review the return of Title IV funds determinations/calculations for conformity with Title IV requirements. Furthermore, according to 34 CFR 668.22, all grant funds relating to post-withdrawal disbursements that are not disbursed to the student’s account, must be disbursed to the student no later than 180 days after the date of the institution’s determination that the student withdrew. Condition: The institutional portion of unearned aid was not returned to the Department of Education within 45 days. This was noted for 11 out of 40 samples tested, which is a statistically valid sample. Questioned Costs: None. Context: The District disbursed $12,283,383 in Title IV awards during fiscal year 2023-24. The value of the sample tested was $6,689, and the portion of the unearned aid not returned timely was $3,683. Cause: The Districts’ internal controls did not ensure compliance with the applicable Title IV regulations. Effect: The cause identified resulted in noncompliance with Title IV regulations. Repeat Finding: Yes, see Finding 2023-002. Recommendation: We recommend that the District improve the existing procedures and controls to ensure compliance with the aforementioned criteria. Views of responsible officials: Management concurs with the finding.
Criteria: According to 34 CFR Section 668.173 (b) and 2 CFR 200.303, the institutional portion of unearned aid must be returned to the appropriate Title IV, HEA program or Federal Family Education Loan (“FFEL”) lender no later than 45 days after the date of the institution’s determination that the student withdrew. Furthermore, the institution must determine the amount of Title IV grant or loan assistance that the student earned as of the student’s withdrawal date. The Compliance Supplement issued by the Office of Management and Budget requires auditors to review the return of Title IV funds determinations/calculations for conformity with Title IV requirements. Furthermore, according to 34 CFR 668.22, all grant funds relating to post-withdrawal disbursements that are not disbursed to the student’s account, must be disbursed to the student no later than 180 days after the date of the institution’s determination that the student withdrew. Condition: The institutional portion of unearned aid was not returned to the Department of Education within 45 days. This was noted for 11 out of 40 samples tested, which is a statistically valid sample. Questioned Costs: None. Context: The District disbursed $12,283,383 in Title IV awards during fiscal year 2023-24. The value of the sample tested was $6,689, and the portion of the unearned aid not returned timely was $3,683. Cause: The Districts’ internal controls did not ensure compliance with the applicable Title IV regulations. Effect: The cause identified resulted in noncompliance with Title IV regulations. Repeat Finding: Yes, see Finding 2023-002. Recommendation: We recommend that the District improve the existing procedures and controls to ensure compliance with the aforementioned criteria. Views of responsible officials: Management concurs with the finding.
Criteria: According to 34 CFR Section 668.173 (b) and 2 CFR 200.303, the institutional portion of unearned aid must be returned to the appropriate Title IV, HEA program or Federal Family Education Loan (“FFEL”) lender no later than 45 days after the date of the institution’s determination that the student withdrew. Furthermore, the institution must determine the amount of Title IV grant or loan assistance that the student earned as of the student’s withdrawal date. The Compliance Supplement issued by the Office of Management and Budget requires auditors to review the return of Title IV funds determinations/calculations for conformity with Title IV requirements. Furthermore, according to 34 CFR 668.22, all grant funds relating to post-withdrawal disbursements that are not disbursed to the student’s account, must be disbursed to the student no later than 180 days after the date of the institution’s determination that the student withdrew. Condition: The institutional portion of unearned aid was not returned to the Department of Education within 45 days. This was noted for 11 out of 40 samples tested, which is a statistically valid sample. Questioned Costs: None. Context: The District disbursed $12,283,383 in Title IV awards during fiscal year 2023-24. The value of the sample tested was $6,689, and the portion of the unearned aid not returned timely was $3,683. Cause: The Districts’ internal controls did not ensure compliance with the applicable Title IV regulations. Effect: The cause identified resulted in noncompliance with Title IV regulations. Repeat Finding: Yes, see Finding 2023-002. Recommendation: We recommend that the District improve the existing procedures and controls to ensure compliance with the aforementioned criteria. Views of responsible officials: Management concurs with the finding.
Criteria: According to 34 CFR Section 668.173 (b) and 2 CFR 200.303, the institutional portion of unearned aid must be returned to the appropriate Title IV, HEA program or Federal Family Education Loan (“FFEL”) lender no later than 45 days after the date of the institution’s determination that the student withdrew. Furthermore, the institution must determine the amount of Title IV grant or loan assistance that the student earned as of the student’s withdrawal date. The Compliance Supplement issued by the Office of Management and Budget requires auditors to review the return of Title IV funds determinations/calculations for conformity with Title IV requirements. Furthermore, according to 34 CFR 668.22, all grant funds relating to post-withdrawal disbursements that are not disbursed to the student’s account, must be disbursed to the student no later than 180 days after the date of the institution’s determination that the student withdrew. Condition: The institutional portion of unearned aid was not returned to the Department of Education within 45 days. This was noted for 11 out of 40 samples tested, which is a statistically valid sample. Questioned Costs: None. Context: The District disbursed $12,283,383 in Title IV awards during fiscal year 2023-24. The value of the sample tested was $6,689, and the portion of the unearned aid not returned timely was $3,683. Cause: The Districts’ internal controls did not ensure compliance with the applicable Title IV regulations. Effect: The cause identified resulted in noncompliance with Title IV regulations. Repeat Finding: Yes, see Finding 2023-002. Recommendation: We recommend that the District improve the existing procedures and controls to ensure compliance with the aforementioned criteria. Views of responsible officials: Management concurs with the finding.
Criteria: In accordance with 34 CFR 685.309(b), 2 CFR 200.303 and the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) Enrollment Reporting Guide published by the Department of Education, schools must review, update, and verify student enrollment statuses, program information, and effective dates that appear on the Enrollment Reporting Roster file or on the Enrollment Maintenance page of the NSLDS Professional Access (NSLDSFAP) website. In addition, schools must report enrollment status changes within 30 days of becoming aware of the status change or in its next scheduled enrollment submission if the scheduled submission is within 60 days. Condition: During our testing of 40 students, which is a statistically valid sample, we noted one instance of change in status not reported timely during the Fall 2023 semester. Questioned Costs: None. Context: One exception was noted out of the 40 students tested, which is a statistically valid sample. Cause: The District revised its enrollment reporting controls after the June 30, 2023 audit and implemented those controls during the Fall 2023 semester. However, prior to this implementation the internal controls that were in place did not identify the errors for compliance with the criteria mentioned above. Effect: Inaccurate information is reflected on the NSLDS database. A student’s enrollment data protects the rights of borrowers by ensuring that loan interest subsidies are based on accurate enrollment data, ensures loan repayment dates are accurately based on the last data of attendance, allows in-school deferments to be automatically granted using NSLDS enrollment data, and provides vast amounts of critical data about the effectiveness of Title IV aid programs, including completion data. Repeat Finding: Yes, see Finding 2023-003. Recommendation: We recognize the District made corrective action after the June 30, 2023 audit and implemented those controls during the Fall 2023 semester. We recommend the District continue to follow those controls put in place to ensure compliance with the aforementioned criteria. Views of responsible officials: Management concurs with the finding.
Criteria: In accordance with 34 CFR 685.309(b), 2 CFR 200.303 and the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) Enrollment Reporting Guide published by the Department of Education, schools must review, update, and verify student enrollment statuses, program information, and effective dates that appear on the Enrollment Reporting Roster file or on the Enrollment Maintenance page of the NSLDS Professional Access (NSLDSFAP) website. In addition, schools must report enrollment status changes within 30 days of becoming aware of the status change or in its next scheduled enrollment submission if the scheduled submission is within 60 days. Condition: During our testing of 40 students, which is a statistically valid sample, we noted one instance of change in status not reported timely during the Fall 2023 semester. Questioned Costs: None. Context: One exception was noted out of the 40 students tested, which is a statistically valid sample. Cause: The District revised its enrollment reporting controls after the June 30, 2023 audit and implemented those controls during the Fall 2023 semester. However, prior to this implementation the internal controls that were in place did not identify the errors for compliance with the criteria mentioned above. Effect: Inaccurate information is reflected on the NSLDS database. A student’s enrollment data protects the rights of borrowers by ensuring that loan interest subsidies are based on accurate enrollment data, ensures loan repayment dates are accurately based on the last data of attendance, allows in-school deferments to be automatically granted using NSLDS enrollment data, and provides vast amounts of critical data about the effectiveness of Title IV aid programs, including completion data. Repeat Finding: Yes, see Finding 2023-003. Recommendation: We recognize the District made corrective action after the June 30, 2023 audit and implemented those controls during the Fall 2023 semester. We recommend the District continue to follow those controls put in place to ensure compliance with the aforementioned criteria. Views of responsible officials: Management concurs with the finding.
Criteria: In accordance with 34 CFR 685.309(b), 2 CFR 200.303 and the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) Enrollment Reporting Guide published by the Department of Education, schools must review, update, and verify student enrollment statuses, program information, and effective dates that appear on the Enrollment Reporting Roster file or on the Enrollment Maintenance page of the NSLDS Professional Access (NSLDSFAP) website. In addition, schools must report enrollment status changes within 30 days of becoming aware of the status change or in its next scheduled enrollment submission if the scheduled submission is within 60 days. Condition: During our testing of 40 students, which is a statistically valid sample, we noted one instance of change in status not reported timely during the Fall 2023 semester. Questioned Costs: None. Context: One exception was noted out of the 40 students tested, which is a statistically valid sample. Cause: The District revised its enrollment reporting controls after the June 30, 2023 audit and implemented those controls during the Fall 2023 semester. However, prior to this implementation the internal controls that were in place did not identify the errors for compliance with the criteria mentioned above. Effect: Inaccurate information is reflected on the NSLDS database. A student’s enrollment data protects the rights of borrowers by ensuring that loan interest subsidies are based on accurate enrollment data, ensures loan repayment dates are accurately based on the last data of attendance, allows in-school deferments to be automatically granted using NSLDS enrollment data, and provides vast amounts of critical data about the effectiveness of Title IV aid programs, including completion data. Repeat Finding: Yes, see Finding 2023-003. Recommendation: We recognize the District made corrective action after the June 30, 2023 audit and implemented those controls during the Fall 2023 semester. We recommend the District continue to follow those controls put in place to ensure compliance with the aforementioned criteria. Views of responsible officials: Management concurs with the finding.