Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Background: During FY 2021-22, UW institutions were awarded $741.6 million in federal funding as part of the Research and Development Cluster, for which UW Madison expended the majority of the funding. UW Madison purchases a variety of supplies and other goods or services to conduct its research activities. Criteria: Under 2 CFR s. 200.303, UW Madison is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that it is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of federal awards. Further, 2 CFR s. 200.405 (a) specifies that for a cost to be allocable to a federal award the cost must be incurred specifically for the federal award; benefit both the federal award and other work; be distributed in proportions; be necessary to overall institutional operations; and be assignable, in part, to the federal award. Condition: We found that UW-Madison charged two unallowable costs to two federal awards during FY 2021 22. First, we found that UW Madison charged $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses relating to a location not used for purposes related to the federal award. Second, we found that UW Madison charged $596 in software license fees to a federal award. However, it is UW Madison?s practice to charge such fees to a nonfederal project. Context: During FY 2021-22, UW-Madison expended $86.9 million in certain nonpayroll expenses using federal Research and Development Cluster funding. There were 84,230 transactions comprising this amount with an average dollar amount of $1,032. We reviewed 40 such transactions to determine if the expenses were allowable under federal regulations. To complete our testing, we requested supporting documentation and information from UW-Madison for the transactions we reviewed. Questioned Costs: We questioned $650 in known questioned costs and an undetermined amount for other expenses we did not review. Because our testing was based upon a sample of payments it is likely there are additional cases where the payment is inappropriately charged to a federal award. We estimate these additional questioned costs are likely over $25,000, which is required to be reported under 2 CFR s. 200.516. Effect: UW-Madison used $650 in federal funds from the Research and Development Cluster for unallowable costs during FY 2021-22. Because unallowable costs were charged to the Research and Development Cluster, UW-Madison was not in compliance with federal requirements for the use of federal funding. Cause: UW-Madison staff indicated that the charges were applied to incorrect accounting codes when the expenses were originally recorded. For example, the $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses was charged to a federal award in the accounting system due to a limitation of certain billing codes for applying such expenses to the correct location of the work. These errors were not identified or corrected during the review of the payment or of other UW Madison monitoring activities. In December 2022 and January 2023, UW Madison corrected these accounting codes for these transactions and transferred the expenses to nonfederal projects. Recommendation: We recommend the University of Wisconsin Madison provide guidance and training to staff to ensure all costs are properly charged to federal award accounting codes and only costs allowable under federal regulations are charged to federal funds. Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Research and Development Cluster (various Assistance Listing numbers) Award Numbers Award Years Various Various Questioned Costs: $650 Type of Finding: Noncompliance Response from the University of Wisconsin Madison: The University of Wisconsin-Madison agrees with the audit finding and recommendation.
Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Background: During FY 2021-22, UW institutions were awarded $741.6 million in federal funding as part of the Research and Development Cluster, for which UW Madison expended the majority of the funding. UW Madison purchases a variety of supplies and other goods or services to conduct its research activities. Criteria: Under 2 CFR s. 200.303, UW Madison is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that it is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of federal awards. Further, 2 CFR s. 200.405 (a) specifies that for a cost to be allocable to a federal award the cost must be incurred specifically for the federal award; benefit both the federal award and other work; be distributed in proportions; be necessary to overall institutional operations; and be assignable, in part, to the federal award. Condition: We found that UW-Madison charged two unallowable costs to two federal awards during FY 2021 22. First, we found that UW Madison charged $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses relating to a location not used for purposes related to the federal award. Second, we found that UW Madison charged $596 in software license fees to a federal award. However, it is UW Madison?s practice to charge such fees to a nonfederal project. Context: During FY 2021-22, UW-Madison expended $86.9 million in certain nonpayroll expenses using federal Research and Development Cluster funding. There were 84,230 transactions comprising this amount with an average dollar amount of $1,032. We reviewed 40 such transactions to determine if the expenses were allowable under federal regulations. To complete our testing, we requested supporting documentation and information from UW-Madison for the transactions we reviewed. Questioned Costs: We questioned $650 in known questioned costs and an undetermined amount for other expenses we did not review. Because our testing was based upon a sample of payments it is likely there are additional cases where the payment is inappropriately charged to a federal award. We estimate these additional questioned costs are likely over $25,000, which is required to be reported under 2 CFR s. 200.516. Effect: UW-Madison used $650 in federal funds from the Research and Development Cluster for unallowable costs during FY 2021-22. Because unallowable costs were charged to the Research and Development Cluster, UW-Madison was not in compliance with federal requirements for the use of federal funding. Cause: UW-Madison staff indicated that the charges were applied to incorrect accounting codes when the expenses were originally recorded. For example, the $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses was charged to a federal award in the accounting system due to a limitation of certain billing codes for applying such expenses to the correct location of the work. These errors were not identified or corrected during the review of the payment or of other UW Madison monitoring activities. In December 2022 and January 2023, UW Madison corrected these accounting codes for these transactions and transferred the expenses to nonfederal projects. Recommendation: We recommend the University of Wisconsin Madison provide guidance and training to staff to ensure all costs are properly charged to federal award accounting codes and only costs allowable under federal regulations are charged to federal funds. Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Research and Development Cluster (various Assistance Listing numbers) Award Numbers Award Years Various Various Questioned Costs: $650 Type of Finding: Noncompliance Response from the University of Wisconsin Madison: The University of Wisconsin-Madison agrees with the audit finding and recommendation.
Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Background: During FY 2021-22, UW institutions were awarded $741.6 million in federal funding as part of the Research and Development Cluster, for which UW Madison expended the majority of the funding. UW Madison purchases a variety of supplies and other goods or services to conduct its research activities. Criteria: Under 2 CFR s. 200.303, UW Madison is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that it is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of federal awards. Further, 2 CFR s. 200.405 (a) specifies that for a cost to be allocable to a federal award the cost must be incurred specifically for the federal award; benefit both the federal award and other work; be distributed in proportions; be necessary to overall institutional operations; and be assignable, in part, to the federal award. Condition: We found that UW-Madison charged two unallowable costs to two federal awards during FY 2021 22. First, we found that UW Madison charged $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses relating to a location not used for purposes related to the federal award. Second, we found that UW Madison charged $596 in software license fees to a federal award. However, it is UW Madison?s practice to charge such fees to a nonfederal project. Context: During FY 2021-22, UW-Madison expended $86.9 million in certain nonpayroll expenses using federal Research and Development Cluster funding. There were 84,230 transactions comprising this amount with an average dollar amount of $1,032. We reviewed 40 such transactions to determine if the expenses were allowable under federal regulations. To complete our testing, we requested supporting documentation and information from UW-Madison for the transactions we reviewed. Questioned Costs: We questioned $650 in known questioned costs and an undetermined amount for other expenses we did not review. Because our testing was based upon a sample of payments it is likely there are additional cases where the payment is inappropriately charged to a federal award. We estimate these additional questioned costs are likely over $25,000, which is required to be reported under 2 CFR s. 200.516. Effect: UW-Madison used $650 in federal funds from the Research and Development Cluster for unallowable costs during FY 2021-22. Because unallowable costs were charged to the Research and Development Cluster, UW-Madison was not in compliance with federal requirements for the use of federal funding. Cause: UW-Madison staff indicated that the charges were applied to incorrect accounting codes when the expenses were originally recorded. For example, the $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses was charged to a federal award in the accounting system due to a limitation of certain billing codes for applying such expenses to the correct location of the work. These errors were not identified or corrected during the review of the payment or of other UW Madison monitoring activities. In December 2022 and January 2023, UW Madison corrected these accounting codes for these transactions and transferred the expenses to nonfederal projects. Recommendation: We recommend the University of Wisconsin Madison provide guidance and training to staff to ensure all costs are properly charged to federal award accounting codes and only costs allowable under federal regulations are charged to federal funds. Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Research and Development Cluster (various Assistance Listing numbers) Award Numbers Award Years Various Various Questioned Costs: $650 Type of Finding: Noncompliance Response from the University of Wisconsin Madison: The University of Wisconsin-Madison agrees with the audit finding and recommendation.
Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Background: During FY 2021-22, UW institutions were awarded $741.6 million in federal funding as part of the Research and Development Cluster, for which UW Madison expended the majority of the funding. UW Madison purchases a variety of supplies and other goods or services to conduct its research activities. Criteria: Under 2 CFR s. 200.303, UW Madison is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that it is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of federal awards. Further, 2 CFR s. 200.405 (a) specifies that for a cost to be allocable to a federal award the cost must be incurred specifically for the federal award; benefit both the federal award and other work; be distributed in proportions; be necessary to overall institutional operations; and be assignable, in part, to the federal award. Condition: We found that UW-Madison charged two unallowable costs to two federal awards during FY 2021 22. First, we found that UW Madison charged $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses relating to a location not used for purposes related to the federal award. Second, we found that UW Madison charged $596 in software license fees to a federal award. However, it is UW Madison?s practice to charge such fees to a nonfederal project. Context: During FY 2021-22, UW-Madison expended $86.9 million in certain nonpayroll expenses using federal Research and Development Cluster funding. There were 84,230 transactions comprising this amount with an average dollar amount of $1,032. We reviewed 40 such transactions to determine if the expenses were allowable under federal regulations. To complete our testing, we requested supporting documentation and information from UW-Madison for the transactions we reviewed. Questioned Costs: We questioned $650 in known questioned costs and an undetermined amount for other expenses we did not review. Because our testing was based upon a sample of payments it is likely there are additional cases where the payment is inappropriately charged to a federal award. We estimate these additional questioned costs are likely over $25,000, which is required to be reported under 2 CFR s. 200.516. Effect: UW-Madison used $650 in federal funds from the Research and Development Cluster for unallowable costs during FY 2021-22. Because unallowable costs were charged to the Research and Development Cluster, UW-Madison was not in compliance with federal requirements for the use of federal funding. Cause: UW-Madison staff indicated that the charges were applied to incorrect accounting codes when the expenses were originally recorded. For example, the $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses was charged to a federal award in the accounting system due to a limitation of certain billing codes for applying such expenses to the correct location of the work. These errors were not identified or corrected during the review of the payment or of other UW Madison monitoring activities. In December 2022 and January 2023, UW Madison corrected these accounting codes for these transactions and transferred the expenses to nonfederal projects. Recommendation: We recommend the University of Wisconsin Madison provide guidance and training to staff to ensure all costs are properly charged to federal award accounting codes and only costs allowable under federal regulations are charged to federal funds. Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Research and Development Cluster (various Assistance Listing numbers) Award Numbers Award Years Various Various Questioned Costs: $650 Type of Finding: Noncompliance Response from the University of Wisconsin Madison: The University of Wisconsin-Madison agrees with the audit finding and recommendation.
Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Background: During FY 2021-22, UW institutions were awarded $741.6 million in federal funding as part of the Research and Development Cluster, for which UW Madison expended the majority of the funding. UW Madison purchases a variety of supplies and other goods or services to conduct its research activities. Criteria: Under 2 CFR s. 200.303, UW Madison is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that it is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of federal awards. Further, 2 CFR s. 200.405 (a) specifies that for a cost to be allocable to a federal award the cost must be incurred specifically for the federal award; benefit both the federal award and other work; be distributed in proportions; be necessary to overall institutional operations; and be assignable, in part, to the federal award. Condition: We found that UW-Madison charged two unallowable costs to two federal awards during FY 2021 22. First, we found that UW Madison charged $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses relating to a location not used for purposes related to the federal award. Second, we found that UW Madison charged $596 in software license fees to a federal award. However, it is UW Madison?s practice to charge such fees to a nonfederal project. Context: During FY 2021-22, UW-Madison expended $86.9 million in certain nonpayroll expenses using federal Research and Development Cluster funding. There were 84,230 transactions comprising this amount with an average dollar amount of $1,032. We reviewed 40 such transactions to determine if the expenses were allowable under federal regulations. To complete our testing, we requested supporting documentation and information from UW-Madison for the transactions we reviewed. Questioned Costs: We questioned $650 in known questioned costs and an undetermined amount for other expenses we did not review. Because our testing was based upon a sample of payments it is likely there are additional cases where the payment is inappropriately charged to a federal award. We estimate these additional questioned costs are likely over $25,000, which is required to be reported under 2 CFR s. 200.516. Effect: UW-Madison used $650 in federal funds from the Research and Development Cluster for unallowable costs during FY 2021-22. Because unallowable costs were charged to the Research and Development Cluster, UW-Madison was not in compliance with federal requirements for the use of federal funding. Cause: UW-Madison staff indicated that the charges were applied to incorrect accounting codes when the expenses were originally recorded. For example, the $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses was charged to a federal award in the accounting system due to a limitation of certain billing codes for applying such expenses to the correct location of the work. These errors were not identified or corrected during the review of the payment or of other UW Madison monitoring activities. In December 2022 and January 2023, UW Madison corrected these accounting codes for these transactions and transferred the expenses to nonfederal projects. Recommendation: We recommend the University of Wisconsin Madison provide guidance and training to staff to ensure all costs are properly charged to federal award accounting codes and only costs allowable under federal regulations are charged to federal funds. Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Research and Development Cluster (various Assistance Listing numbers) Award Numbers Award Years Various Various Questioned Costs: $650 Type of Finding: Noncompliance Response from the University of Wisconsin Madison: The University of Wisconsin-Madison agrees with the audit finding and recommendation.
Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Background: During FY 2021-22, UW institutions were awarded $741.6 million in federal funding as part of the Research and Development Cluster, for which UW Madison expended the majority of the funding. UW Madison purchases a variety of supplies and other goods or services to conduct its research activities. Criteria: Under 2 CFR s. 200.303, UW Madison is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that it is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of federal awards. Further, 2 CFR s. 200.405 (a) specifies that for a cost to be allocable to a federal award the cost must be incurred specifically for the federal award; benefit both the federal award and other work; be distributed in proportions; be necessary to overall institutional operations; and be assignable, in part, to the federal award. Condition: We found that UW-Madison charged two unallowable costs to two federal awards during FY 2021 22. First, we found that UW Madison charged $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses relating to a location not used for purposes related to the federal award. Second, we found that UW Madison charged $596 in software license fees to a federal award. However, it is UW Madison?s practice to charge such fees to a nonfederal project. Context: During FY 2021-22, UW-Madison expended $86.9 million in certain nonpayroll expenses using federal Research and Development Cluster funding. There were 84,230 transactions comprising this amount with an average dollar amount of $1,032. We reviewed 40 such transactions to determine if the expenses were allowable under federal regulations. To complete our testing, we requested supporting documentation and information from UW-Madison for the transactions we reviewed. Questioned Costs: We questioned $650 in known questioned costs and an undetermined amount for other expenses we did not review. Because our testing was based upon a sample of payments it is likely there are additional cases where the payment is inappropriately charged to a federal award. We estimate these additional questioned costs are likely over $25,000, which is required to be reported under 2 CFR s. 200.516. Effect: UW-Madison used $650 in federal funds from the Research and Development Cluster for unallowable costs during FY 2021-22. Because unallowable costs were charged to the Research and Development Cluster, UW-Madison was not in compliance with federal requirements for the use of federal funding. Cause: UW-Madison staff indicated that the charges were applied to incorrect accounting codes when the expenses were originally recorded. For example, the $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses was charged to a federal award in the accounting system due to a limitation of certain billing codes for applying such expenses to the correct location of the work. These errors were not identified or corrected during the review of the payment or of other UW Madison monitoring activities. In December 2022 and January 2023, UW Madison corrected these accounting codes for these transactions and transferred the expenses to nonfederal projects. Recommendation: We recommend the University of Wisconsin Madison provide guidance and training to staff to ensure all costs are properly charged to federal award accounting codes and only costs allowable under federal regulations are charged to federal funds. Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Research and Development Cluster (various Assistance Listing numbers) Award Numbers Award Years Various Various Questioned Costs: $650 Type of Finding: Noncompliance Response from the University of Wisconsin Madison: The University of Wisconsin-Madison agrees with the audit finding and recommendation.
Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Background: During FY 2021-22, UW institutions were awarded $741.6 million in federal funding as part of the Research and Development Cluster, for which UW Madison expended the majority of the funding. UW Madison purchases a variety of supplies and other goods or services to conduct its research activities. Criteria: Under 2 CFR s. 200.303, UW Madison is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that it is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of federal awards. Further, 2 CFR s. 200.405 (a) specifies that for a cost to be allocable to a federal award the cost must be incurred specifically for the federal award; benefit both the federal award and other work; be distributed in proportions; be necessary to overall institutional operations; and be assignable, in part, to the federal award. Condition: We found that UW-Madison charged two unallowable costs to two federal awards during FY 2021 22. First, we found that UW Madison charged $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses relating to a location not used for purposes related to the federal award. Second, we found that UW Madison charged $596 in software license fees to a federal award. However, it is UW Madison?s practice to charge such fees to a nonfederal project. Context: During FY 2021-22, UW-Madison expended $86.9 million in certain nonpayroll expenses using federal Research and Development Cluster funding. There were 84,230 transactions comprising this amount with an average dollar amount of $1,032. We reviewed 40 such transactions to determine if the expenses were allowable under federal regulations. To complete our testing, we requested supporting documentation and information from UW-Madison for the transactions we reviewed. Questioned Costs: We questioned $650 in known questioned costs and an undetermined amount for other expenses we did not review. Because our testing was based upon a sample of payments it is likely there are additional cases where the payment is inappropriately charged to a federal award. We estimate these additional questioned costs are likely over $25,000, which is required to be reported under 2 CFR s. 200.516. Effect: UW-Madison used $650 in federal funds from the Research and Development Cluster for unallowable costs during FY 2021-22. Because unallowable costs were charged to the Research and Development Cluster, UW-Madison was not in compliance with federal requirements for the use of federal funding. Cause: UW-Madison staff indicated that the charges were applied to incorrect accounting codes when the expenses were originally recorded. For example, the $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses was charged to a federal award in the accounting system due to a limitation of certain billing codes for applying such expenses to the correct location of the work. These errors were not identified or corrected during the review of the payment or of other UW Madison monitoring activities. In December 2022 and January 2023, UW Madison corrected these accounting codes for these transactions and transferred the expenses to nonfederal projects. Recommendation: We recommend the University of Wisconsin Madison provide guidance and training to staff to ensure all costs are properly charged to federal award accounting codes and only costs allowable under federal regulations are charged to federal funds. Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Research and Development Cluster (various Assistance Listing numbers) Award Numbers Award Years Various Various Questioned Costs: $650 Type of Finding: Noncompliance Response from the University of Wisconsin Madison: The University of Wisconsin-Madison agrees with the audit finding and recommendation.
Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Background: During FY 2021-22, UW institutions were awarded $741.6 million in federal funding as part of the Research and Development Cluster, for which UW Madison expended the majority of the funding. UW Madison purchases a variety of supplies and other goods or services to conduct its research activities. Criteria: Under 2 CFR s. 200.303, UW Madison is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that it is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of federal awards. Further, 2 CFR s. 200.405 (a) specifies that for a cost to be allocable to a federal award the cost must be incurred specifically for the federal award; benefit both the federal award and other work; be distributed in proportions; be necessary to overall institutional operations; and be assignable, in part, to the federal award. Condition: We found that UW-Madison charged two unallowable costs to two federal awards during FY 2021 22. First, we found that UW Madison charged $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses relating to a location not used for purposes related to the federal award. Second, we found that UW Madison charged $596 in software license fees to a federal award. However, it is UW Madison?s practice to charge such fees to a nonfederal project. Context: During FY 2021-22, UW-Madison expended $86.9 million in certain nonpayroll expenses using federal Research and Development Cluster funding. There were 84,230 transactions comprising this amount with an average dollar amount of $1,032. We reviewed 40 such transactions to determine if the expenses were allowable under federal regulations. To complete our testing, we requested supporting documentation and information from UW-Madison for the transactions we reviewed. Questioned Costs: We questioned $650 in known questioned costs and an undetermined amount for other expenses we did not review. Because our testing was based upon a sample of payments it is likely there are additional cases where the payment is inappropriately charged to a federal award. We estimate these additional questioned costs are likely over $25,000, which is required to be reported under 2 CFR s. 200.516. Effect: UW-Madison used $650 in federal funds from the Research and Development Cluster for unallowable costs during FY 2021-22. Because unallowable costs were charged to the Research and Development Cluster, UW-Madison was not in compliance with federal requirements for the use of federal funding. Cause: UW-Madison staff indicated that the charges were applied to incorrect accounting codes when the expenses were originally recorded. For example, the $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses was charged to a federal award in the accounting system due to a limitation of certain billing codes for applying such expenses to the correct location of the work. These errors were not identified or corrected during the review of the payment or of other UW Madison monitoring activities. In December 2022 and January 2023, UW Madison corrected these accounting codes for these transactions and transferred the expenses to nonfederal projects. Recommendation: We recommend the University of Wisconsin Madison provide guidance and training to staff to ensure all costs are properly charged to federal award accounting codes and only costs allowable under federal regulations are charged to federal funds. Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Research and Development Cluster (various Assistance Listing numbers) Award Numbers Award Years Various Various Questioned Costs: $650 Type of Finding: Noncompliance Response from the University of Wisconsin Madison: The University of Wisconsin-Madison agrees with the audit finding and recommendation.
Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Background: During FY 2021-22, UW institutions were awarded $741.6 million in federal funding as part of the Research and Development Cluster, for which UW Madison expended the majority of the funding. UW Madison purchases a variety of supplies and other goods or services to conduct its research activities. Criteria: Under 2 CFR s. 200.303, UW Madison is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that it is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of federal awards. Further, 2 CFR s. 200.405 (a) specifies that for a cost to be allocable to a federal award the cost must be incurred specifically for the federal award; benefit both the federal award and other work; be distributed in proportions; be necessary to overall institutional operations; and be assignable, in part, to the federal award. Condition: We found that UW-Madison charged two unallowable costs to two federal awards during FY 2021 22. First, we found that UW Madison charged $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses relating to a location not used for purposes related to the federal award. Second, we found that UW Madison charged $596 in software license fees to a federal award. However, it is UW Madison?s practice to charge such fees to a nonfederal project. Context: During FY 2021-22, UW-Madison expended $86.9 million in certain nonpayroll expenses using federal Research and Development Cluster funding. There were 84,230 transactions comprising this amount with an average dollar amount of $1,032. We reviewed 40 such transactions to determine if the expenses were allowable under federal regulations. To complete our testing, we requested supporting documentation and information from UW-Madison for the transactions we reviewed. Questioned Costs: We questioned $650 in known questioned costs and an undetermined amount for other expenses we did not review. Because our testing was based upon a sample of payments it is likely there are additional cases where the payment is inappropriately charged to a federal award. We estimate these additional questioned costs are likely over $25,000, which is required to be reported under 2 CFR s. 200.516. Effect: UW-Madison used $650 in federal funds from the Research and Development Cluster for unallowable costs during FY 2021-22. Because unallowable costs were charged to the Research and Development Cluster, UW-Madison was not in compliance with federal requirements for the use of federal funding. Cause: UW-Madison staff indicated that the charges were applied to incorrect accounting codes when the expenses were originally recorded. For example, the $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses was charged to a federal award in the accounting system due to a limitation of certain billing codes for applying such expenses to the correct location of the work. These errors were not identified or corrected during the review of the payment or of other UW Madison monitoring activities. In December 2022 and January 2023, UW Madison corrected these accounting codes for these transactions and transferred the expenses to nonfederal projects. Recommendation: We recommend the University of Wisconsin Madison provide guidance and training to staff to ensure all costs are properly charged to federal award accounting codes and only costs allowable under federal regulations are charged to federal funds. Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Research and Development Cluster (various Assistance Listing numbers) Award Numbers Award Years Various Various Questioned Costs: $650 Type of Finding: Noncompliance Response from the University of Wisconsin Madison: The University of Wisconsin-Madison agrees with the audit finding and recommendation.
Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Background: During FY 2021-22, UW institutions were awarded $741.6 million in federal funding as part of the Research and Development Cluster, for which UW Madison expended the majority of the funding. UW Madison purchases a variety of supplies and other goods or services to conduct its research activities. Criteria: Under 2 CFR s. 200.303, UW Madison is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that it is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of federal awards. Further, 2 CFR s. 200.405 (a) specifies that for a cost to be allocable to a federal award the cost must be incurred specifically for the federal award; benefit both the federal award and other work; be distributed in proportions; be necessary to overall institutional operations; and be assignable, in part, to the federal award. Condition: We found that UW-Madison charged two unallowable costs to two federal awards during FY 2021 22. First, we found that UW Madison charged $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses relating to a location not used for purposes related to the federal award. Second, we found that UW Madison charged $596 in software license fees to a federal award. However, it is UW Madison?s practice to charge such fees to a nonfederal project. Context: During FY 2021-22, UW-Madison expended $86.9 million in certain nonpayroll expenses using federal Research and Development Cluster funding. There were 84,230 transactions comprising this amount with an average dollar amount of $1,032. We reviewed 40 such transactions to determine if the expenses were allowable under federal regulations. To complete our testing, we requested supporting documentation and information from UW-Madison for the transactions we reviewed. Questioned Costs: We questioned $650 in known questioned costs and an undetermined amount for other expenses we did not review. Because our testing was based upon a sample of payments it is likely there are additional cases where the payment is inappropriately charged to a federal award. We estimate these additional questioned costs are likely over $25,000, which is required to be reported under 2 CFR s. 200.516. Effect: UW-Madison used $650 in federal funds from the Research and Development Cluster for unallowable costs during FY 2021-22. Because unallowable costs were charged to the Research and Development Cluster, UW-Madison was not in compliance with federal requirements for the use of federal funding. Cause: UW-Madison staff indicated that the charges were applied to incorrect accounting codes when the expenses were originally recorded. For example, the $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses was charged to a federal award in the accounting system due to a limitation of certain billing codes for applying such expenses to the correct location of the work. These errors were not identified or corrected during the review of the payment or of other UW Madison monitoring activities. In December 2022 and January 2023, UW Madison corrected these accounting codes for these transactions and transferred the expenses to nonfederal projects. Recommendation: We recommend the University of Wisconsin Madison provide guidance and training to staff to ensure all costs are properly charged to federal award accounting codes and only costs allowable under federal regulations are charged to federal funds. Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Research and Development Cluster (various Assistance Listing numbers) Award Numbers Award Years Various Various Questioned Costs: $650 Type of Finding: Noncompliance Response from the University of Wisconsin Madison: The University of Wisconsin-Madison agrees with the audit finding and recommendation.
Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Background: During FY 2021-22, UW institutions were awarded $741.6 million in federal funding as part of the Research and Development Cluster, for which UW Madison expended the majority of the funding. UW Madison purchases a variety of supplies and other goods or services to conduct its research activities. Criteria: Under 2 CFR s. 200.303, UW Madison is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that it is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of federal awards. Further, 2 CFR s. 200.405 (a) specifies that for a cost to be allocable to a federal award the cost must be incurred specifically for the federal award; benefit both the federal award and other work; be distributed in proportions; be necessary to overall institutional operations; and be assignable, in part, to the federal award. Condition: We found that UW-Madison charged two unallowable costs to two federal awards during FY 2021 22. First, we found that UW Madison charged $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses relating to a location not used for purposes related to the federal award. Second, we found that UW Madison charged $596 in software license fees to a federal award. However, it is UW Madison?s practice to charge such fees to a nonfederal project. Context: During FY 2021-22, UW-Madison expended $86.9 million in certain nonpayroll expenses using federal Research and Development Cluster funding. There were 84,230 transactions comprising this amount with an average dollar amount of $1,032. We reviewed 40 such transactions to determine if the expenses were allowable under federal regulations. To complete our testing, we requested supporting documentation and information from UW-Madison for the transactions we reviewed. Questioned Costs: We questioned $650 in known questioned costs and an undetermined amount for other expenses we did not review. Because our testing was based upon a sample of payments it is likely there are additional cases where the payment is inappropriately charged to a federal award. We estimate these additional questioned costs are likely over $25,000, which is required to be reported under 2 CFR s. 200.516. Effect: UW-Madison used $650 in federal funds from the Research and Development Cluster for unallowable costs during FY 2021-22. Because unallowable costs were charged to the Research and Development Cluster, UW-Madison was not in compliance with federal requirements for the use of federal funding. Cause: UW-Madison staff indicated that the charges were applied to incorrect accounting codes when the expenses were originally recorded. For example, the $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses was charged to a federal award in the accounting system due to a limitation of certain billing codes for applying such expenses to the correct location of the work. These errors were not identified or corrected during the review of the payment or of other UW Madison monitoring activities. In December 2022 and January 2023, UW Madison corrected these accounting codes for these transactions and transferred the expenses to nonfederal projects. Recommendation: We recommend the University of Wisconsin Madison provide guidance and training to staff to ensure all costs are properly charged to federal award accounting codes and only costs allowable under federal regulations are charged to federal funds. Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Research and Development Cluster (various Assistance Listing numbers) Award Numbers Award Years Various Various Questioned Costs: $650 Type of Finding: Noncompliance Response from the University of Wisconsin Madison: The University of Wisconsin-Madison agrees with the audit finding and recommendation.
Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Background: During FY 2021-22, UW institutions were awarded $741.6 million in federal funding as part of the Research and Development Cluster, for which UW Madison expended the majority of the funding. UW Madison purchases a variety of supplies and other goods or services to conduct its research activities. Criteria: Under 2 CFR s. 200.303, UW Madison is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that it is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of federal awards. Further, 2 CFR s. 200.405 (a) specifies that for a cost to be allocable to a federal award the cost must be incurred specifically for the federal award; benefit both the federal award and other work; be distributed in proportions; be necessary to overall institutional operations; and be assignable, in part, to the federal award. Condition: We found that UW-Madison charged two unallowable costs to two federal awards during FY 2021 22. First, we found that UW Madison charged $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses relating to a location not used for purposes related to the federal award. Second, we found that UW Madison charged $596 in software license fees to a federal award. However, it is UW Madison?s practice to charge such fees to a nonfederal project. Context: During FY 2021-22, UW-Madison expended $86.9 million in certain nonpayroll expenses using federal Research and Development Cluster funding. There were 84,230 transactions comprising this amount with an average dollar amount of $1,032. We reviewed 40 such transactions to determine if the expenses were allowable under federal regulations. To complete our testing, we requested supporting documentation and information from UW-Madison for the transactions we reviewed. Questioned Costs: We questioned $650 in known questioned costs and an undetermined amount for other expenses we did not review. Because our testing was based upon a sample of payments it is likely there are additional cases where the payment is inappropriately charged to a federal award. We estimate these additional questioned costs are likely over $25,000, which is required to be reported under 2 CFR s. 200.516. Effect: UW-Madison used $650 in federal funds from the Research and Development Cluster for unallowable costs during FY 2021-22. Because unallowable costs were charged to the Research and Development Cluster, UW-Madison was not in compliance with federal requirements for the use of federal funding. Cause: UW-Madison staff indicated that the charges were applied to incorrect accounting codes when the expenses were originally recorded. For example, the $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses was charged to a federal award in the accounting system due to a limitation of certain billing codes for applying such expenses to the correct location of the work. These errors were not identified or corrected during the review of the payment or of other UW Madison monitoring activities. In December 2022 and January 2023, UW Madison corrected these accounting codes for these transactions and transferred the expenses to nonfederal projects. Recommendation: We recommend the University of Wisconsin Madison provide guidance and training to staff to ensure all costs are properly charged to federal award accounting codes and only costs allowable under federal regulations are charged to federal funds. Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Research and Development Cluster (various Assistance Listing numbers) Award Numbers Award Years Various Various Questioned Costs: $650 Type of Finding: Noncompliance Response from the University of Wisconsin Madison: The University of Wisconsin-Madison agrees with the audit finding and recommendation.
Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Background: During FY 2021-22, UW institutions were awarded $741.6 million in federal funding as part of the Research and Development Cluster, for which UW Madison expended the majority of the funding. UW Madison purchases a variety of supplies and other goods or services to conduct its research activities. Criteria: Under 2 CFR s. 200.303, UW Madison is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that it is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of federal awards. Further, 2 CFR s. 200.405 (a) specifies that for a cost to be allocable to a federal award the cost must be incurred specifically for the federal award; benefit both the federal award and other work; be distributed in proportions; be necessary to overall institutional operations; and be assignable, in part, to the federal award. Condition: We found that UW-Madison charged two unallowable costs to two federal awards during FY 2021 22. First, we found that UW Madison charged $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses relating to a location not used for purposes related to the federal award. Second, we found that UW Madison charged $596 in software license fees to a federal award. However, it is UW Madison?s practice to charge such fees to a nonfederal project. Context: During FY 2021-22, UW-Madison expended $86.9 million in certain nonpayroll expenses using federal Research and Development Cluster funding. There were 84,230 transactions comprising this amount with an average dollar amount of $1,032. We reviewed 40 such transactions to determine if the expenses were allowable under federal regulations. To complete our testing, we requested supporting documentation and information from UW-Madison for the transactions we reviewed. Questioned Costs: We questioned $650 in known questioned costs and an undetermined amount for other expenses we did not review. Because our testing was based upon a sample of payments it is likely there are additional cases where the payment is inappropriately charged to a federal award. We estimate these additional questioned costs are likely over $25,000, which is required to be reported under 2 CFR s. 200.516. Effect: UW-Madison used $650 in federal funds from the Research and Development Cluster for unallowable costs during FY 2021-22. Because unallowable costs were charged to the Research and Development Cluster, UW-Madison was not in compliance with federal requirements for the use of federal funding. Cause: UW-Madison staff indicated that the charges were applied to incorrect accounting codes when the expenses were originally recorded. For example, the $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses was charged to a federal award in the accounting system due to a limitation of certain billing codes for applying such expenses to the correct location of the work. These errors were not identified or corrected during the review of the payment or of other UW Madison monitoring activities. In December 2022 and January 2023, UW Madison corrected these accounting codes for these transactions and transferred the expenses to nonfederal projects. Recommendation: We recommend the University of Wisconsin Madison provide guidance and training to staff to ensure all costs are properly charged to federal award accounting codes and only costs allowable under federal regulations are charged to federal funds. Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Research and Development Cluster (various Assistance Listing numbers) Award Numbers Award Years Various Various Questioned Costs: $650 Type of Finding: Noncompliance Response from the University of Wisconsin Madison: The University of Wisconsin-Madison agrees with the audit finding and recommendation.
Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Background: During FY 2021-22, UW institutions were awarded $741.6 million in federal funding as part of the Research and Development Cluster, for which UW Madison expended the majority of the funding. UW Madison purchases a variety of supplies and other goods or services to conduct its research activities. Criteria: Under 2 CFR s. 200.303, UW Madison is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that it is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of federal awards. Further, 2 CFR s. 200.405 (a) specifies that for a cost to be allocable to a federal award the cost must be incurred specifically for the federal award; benefit both the federal award and other work; be distributed in proportions; be necessary to overall institutional operations; and be assignable, in part, to the federal award. Condition: We found that UW-Madison charged two unallowable costs to two federal awards during FY 2021 22. First, we found that UW Madison charged $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses relating to a location not used for purposes related to the federal award. Second, we found that UW Madison charged $596 in software license fees to a federal award. However, it is UW Madison?s practice to charge such fees to a nonfederal project. Context: During FY 2021-22, UW-Madison expended $86.9 million in certain nonpayroll expenses using federal Research and Development Cluster funding. There were 84,230 transactions comprising this amount with an average dollar amount of $1,032. We reviewed 40 such transactions to determine if the expenses were allowable under federal regulations. To complete our testing, we requested supporting documentation and information from UW-Madison for the transactions we reviewed. Questioned Costs: We questioned $650 in known questioned costs and an undetermined amount for other expenses we did not review. Because our testing was based upon a sample of payments it is likely there are additional cases where the payment is inappropriately charged to a federal award. We estimate these additional questioned costs are likely over $25,000, which is required to be reported under 2 CFR s. 200.516. Effect: UW-Madison used $650 in federal funds from the Research and Development Cluster for unallowable costs during FY 2021-22. Because unallowable costs were charged to the Research and Development Cluster, UW-Madison was not in compliance with federal requirements for the use of federal funding. Cause: UW-Madison staff indicated that the charges were applied to incorrect accounting codes when the expenses were originally recorded. For example, the $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses was charged to a federal award in the accounting system due to a limitation of certain billing codes for applying such expenses to the correct location of the work. These errors were not identified or corrected during the review of the payment or of other UW Madison monitoring activities. In December 2022 and January 2023, UW Madison corrected these accounting codes for these transactions and transferred the expenses to nonfederal projects. Recommendation: We recommend the University of Wisconsin Madison provide guidance and training to staff to ensure all costs are properly charged to federal award accounting codes and only costs allowable under federal regulations are charged to federal funds. Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Research and Development Cluster (various Assistance Listing numbers) Award Numbers Award Years Various Various Questioned Costs: $650 Type of Finding: Noncompliance Response from the University of Wisconsin Madison: The University of Wisconsin-Madison agrees with the audit finding and recommendation.
Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Background: During FY 2021-22, UW institutions were awarded $741.6 million in federal funding as part of the Research and Development Cluster, for which UW Madison expended the majority of the funding. UW Madison purchases a variety of supplies and other goods or services to conduct its research activities. Criteria: Under 2 CFR s. 200.303, UW Madison is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that it is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of federal awards. Further, 2 CFR s. 200.405 (a) specifies that for a cost to be allocable to a federal award the cost must be incurred specifically for the federal award; benefit both the federal award and other work; be distributed in proportions; be necessary to overall institutional operations; and be assignable, in part, to the federal award. Condition: We found that UW-Madison charged two unallowable costs to two federal awards during FY 2021 22. First, we found that UW Madison charged $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses relating to a location not used for purposes related to the federal award. Second, we found that UW Madison charged $596 in software license fees to a federal award. However, it is UW Madison?s practice to charge such fees to a nonfederal project. Context: During FY 2021-22, UW-Madison expended $86.9 million in certain nonpayroll expenses using federal Research and Development Cluster funding. There were 84,230 transactions comprising this amount with an average dollar amount of $1,032. We reviewed 40 such transactions to determine if the expenses were allowable under federal regulations. To complete our testing, we requested supporting documentation and information from UW-Madison for the transactions we reviewed. Questioned Costs: We questioned $650 in known questioned costs and an undetermined amount for other expenses we did not review. Because our testing was based upon a sample of payments it is likely there are additional cases where the payment is inappropriately charged to a federal award. We estimate these additional questioned costs are likely over $25,000, which is required to be reported under 2 CFR s. 200.516. Effect: UW-Madison used $650 in federal funds from the Research and Development Cluster for unallowable costs during FY 2021-22. Because unallowable costs were charged to the Research and Development Cluster, UW-Madison was not in compliance with federal requirements for the use of federal funding. Cause: UW-Madison staff indicated that the charges were applied to incorrect accounting codes when the expenses were originally recorded. For example, the $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses was charged to a federal award in the accounting system due to a limitation of certain billing codes for applying such expenses to the correct location of the work. These errors were not identified or corrected during the review of the payment or of other UW Madison monitoring activities. In December 2022 and January 2023, UW Madison corrected these accounting codes for these transactions and transferred the expenses to nonfederal projects. Recommendation: We recommend the University of Wisconsin Madison provide guidance and training to staff to ensure all costs are properly charged to federal award accounting codes and only costs allowable under federal regulations are charged to federal funds. Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Research and Development Cluster (various Assistance Listing numbers) Award Numbers Award Years Various Various Questioned Costs: $650 Type of Finding: Noncompliance Response from the University of Wisconsin Madison: The University of Wisconsin-Madison agrees with the audit finding and recommendation.
Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Background: During FY 2021-22, UW institutions were awarded $741.6 million in federal funding as part of the Research and Development Cluster, for which UW Madison expended the majority of the funding. UW Madison purchases a variety of supplies and other goods or services to conduct its research activities. Criteria: Under 2 CFR s. 200.303, UW Madison is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that it is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of federal awards. Further, 2 CFR s. 200.405 (a) specifies that for a cost to be allocable to a federal award the cost must be incurred specifically for the federal award; benefit both the federal award and other work; be distributed in proportions; be necessary to overall institutional operations; and be assignable, in part, to the federal award. Condition: We found that UW-Madison charged two unallowable costs to two federal awards during FY 2021 22. First, we found that UW Madison charged $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses relating to a location not used for purposes related to the federal award. Second, we found that UW Madison charged $596 in software license fees to a federal award. However, it is UW Madison?s practice to charge such fees to a nonfederal project. Context: During FY 2021-22, UW-Madison expended $86.9 million in certain nonpayroll expenses using federal Research and Development Cluster funding. There were 84,230 transactions comprising this amount with an average dollar amount of $1,032. We reviewed 40 such transactions to determine if the expenses were allowable under federal regulations. To complete our testing, we requested supporting documentation and information from UW-Madison for the transactions we reviewed. Questioned Costs: We questioned $650 in known questioned costs and an undetermined amount for other expenses we did not review. Because our testing was based upon a sample of payments it is likely there are additional cases where the payment is inappropriately charged to a federal award. We estimate these additional questioned costs are likely over $25,000, which is required to be reported under 2 CFR s. 200.516. Effect: UW-Madison used $650 in federal funds from the Research and Development Cluster for unallowable costs during FY 2021-22. Because unallowable costs were charged to the Research and Development Cluster, UW-Madison was not in compliance with federal requirements for the use of federal funding. Cause: UW-Madison staff indicated that the charges were applied to incorrect accounting codes when the expenses were originally recorded. For example, the $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses was charged to a federal award in the accounting system due to a limitation of certain billing codes for applying such expenses to the correct location of the work. These errors were not identified or corrected during the review of the payment or of other UW Madison monitoring activities. In December 2022 and January 2023, UW Madison corrected these accounting codes for these transactions and transferred the expenses to nonfederal projects. Recommendation: We recommend the University of Wisconsin Madison provide guidance and training to staff to ensure all costs are properly charged to federal award accounting codes and only costs allowable under federal regulations are charged to federal funds. Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Research and Development Cluster (various Assistance Listing numbers) Award Numbers Award Years Various Various Questioned Costs: $650 Type of Finding: Noncompliance Response from the University of Wisconsin Madison: The University of Wisconsin-Madison agrees with the audit finding and recommendation.
Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Background: During FY 2021-22, UW institutions were awarded $741.6 million in federal funding as part of the Research and Development Cluster, for which UW Madison expended the majority of the funding. UW Madison purchases a variety of supplies and other goods or services to conduct its research activities. Criteria: Under 2 CFR s. 200.303, UW Madison is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that it is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of federal awards. Further, 2 CFR s. 200.405 (a) specifies that for a cost to be allocable to a federal award the cost must be incurred specifically for the federal award; benefit both the federal award and other work; be distributed in proportions; be necessary to overall institutional operations; and be assignable, in part, to the federal award. Condition: We found that UW-Madison charged two unallowable costs to two federal awards during FY 2021 22. First, we found that UW Madison charged $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses relating to a location not used for purposes related to the federal award. Second, we found that UW Madison charged $596 in software license fees to a federal award. However, it is UW Madison?s practice to charge such fees to a nonfederal project. Context: During FY 2021-22, UW-Madison expended $86.9 million in certain nonpayroll expenses using federal Research and Development Cluster funding. There were 84,230 transactions comprising this amount with an average dollar amount of $1,032. We reviewed 40 such transactions to determine if the expenses were allowable under federal regulations. To complete our testing, we requested supporting documentation and information from UW-Madison for the transactions we reviewed. Questioned Costs: We questioned $650 in known questioned costs and an undetermined amount for other expenses we did not review. Because our testing was based upon a sample of payments it is likely there are additional cases where the payment is inappropriately charged to a federal award. We estimate these additional questioned costs are likely over $25,000, which is required to be reported under 2 CFR s. 200.516. Effect: UW-Madison used $650 in federal funds from the Research and Development Cluster for unallowable costs during FY 2021-22. Because unallowable costs were charged to the Research and Development Cluster, UW-Madison was not in compliance with federal requirements for the use of federal funding. Cause: UW-Madison staff indicated that the charges were applied to incorrect accounting codes when the expenses were originally recorded. For example, the $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses was charged to a federal award in the accounting system due to a limitation of certain billing codes for applying such expenses to the correct location of the work. These errors were not identified or corrected during the review of the payment or of other UW Madison monitoring activities. In December 2022 and January 2023, UW Madison corrected these accounting codes for these transactions and transferred the expenses to nonfederal projects. Recommendation: We recommend the University of Wisconsin Madison provide guidance and training to staff to ensure all costs are properly charged to federal award accounting codes and only costs allowable under federal regulations are charged to federal funds. Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Research and Development Cluster (various Assistance Listing numbers) Award Numbers Award Years Various Various Questioned Costs: $650 Type of Finding: Noncompliance Response from the University of Wisconsin Madison: The University of Wisconsin-Madison agrees with the audit finding and recommendation.
Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Background: During FY 2021-22, UW institutions were awarded $741.6 million in federal funding as part of the Research and Development Cluster, for which UW Madison expended the majority of the funding. UW Madison purchases a variety of supplies and other goods or services to conduct its research activities. Criteria: Under 2 CFR s. 200.303, UW Madison is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that it is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of federal awards. Further, 2 CFR s. 200.405 (a) specifies that for a cost to be allocable to a federal award the cost must be incurred specifically for the federal award; benefit both the federal award and other work; be distributed in proportions; be necessary to overall institutional operations; and be assignable, in part, to the federal award. Condition: We found that UW-Madison charged two unallowable costs to two federal awards during FY 2021 22. First, we found that UW Madison charged $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses relating to a location not used for purposes related to the federal award. Second, we found that UW Madison charged $596 in software license fees to a federal award. However, it is UW Madison?s practice to charge such fees to a nonfederal project. Context: During FY 2021-22, UW-Madison expended $86.9 million in certain nonpayroll expenses using federal Research and Development Cluster funding. There were 84,230 transactions comprising this amount with an average dollar amount of $1,032. We reviewed 40 such transactions to determine if the expenses were allowable under federal regulations. To complete our testing, we requested supporting documentation and information from UW-Madison for the transactions we reviewed. Questioned Costs: We questioned $650 in known questioned costs and an undetermined amount for other expenses we did not review. Because our testing was based upon a sample of payments it is likely there are additional cases where the payment is inappropriately charged to a federal award. We estimate these additional questioned costs are likely over $25,000, which is required to be reported under 2 CFR s. 200.516. Effect: UW-Madison used $650 in federal funds from the Research and Development Cluster for unallowable costs during FY 2021-22. Because unallowable costs were charged to the Research and Development Cluster, UW-Madison was not in compliance with federal requirements for the use of federal funding. Cause: UW-Madison staff indicated that the charges were applied to incorrect accounting codes when the expenses were originally recorded. For example, the $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses was charged to a federal award in the accounting system due to a limitation of certain billing codes for applying such expenses to the correct location of the work. These errors were not identified or corrected during the review of the payment or of other UW Madison monitoring activities. In December 2022 and January 2023, UW Madison corrected these accounting codes for these transactions and transferred the expenses to nonfederal projects. Recommendation: We recommend the University of Wisconsin Madison provide guidance and training to staff to ensure all costs are properly charged to federal award accounting codes and only costs allowable under federal regulations are charged to federal funds. Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Research and Development Cluster (various Assistance Listing numbers) Award Numbers Award Years Various Various Questioned Costs: $650 Type of Finding: Noncompliance Response from the University of Wisconsin Madison: The University of Wisconsin-Madison agrees with the audit finding and recommendation.
Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Background: During FY 2021-22, UW institutions were awarded $741.6 million in federal funding as part of the Research and Development Cluster, for which UW Madison expended the majority of the funding. UW Madison purchases a variety of supplies and other goods or services to conduct its research activities. Criteria: Under 2 CFR s. 200.303, UW Madison is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that it is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of federal awards. Further, 2 CFR s. 200.405 (a) specifies that for a cost to be allocable to a federal award the cost must be incurred specifically for the federal award; benefit both the federal award and other work; be distributed in proportions; be necessary to overall institutional operations; and be assignable, in part, to the federal award. Condition: We found that UW-Madison charged two unallowable costs to two federal awards during FY 2021 22. First, we found that UW Madison charged $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses relating to a location not used for purposes related to the federal award. Second, we found that UW Madison charged $596 in software license fees to a federal award. However, it is UW Madison?s practice to charge such fees to a nonfederal project. Context: During FY 2021-22, UW-Madison expended $86.9 million in certain nonpayroll expenses using federal Research and Development Cluster funding. There were 84,230 transactions comprising this amount with an average dollar amount of $1,032. We reviewed 40 such transactions to determine if the expenses were allowable under federal regulations. To complete our testing, we requested supporting documentation and information from UW-Madison for the transactions we reviewed. Questioned Costs: We questioned $650 in known questioned costs and an undetermined amount for other expenses we did not review. Because our testing was based upon a sample of payments it is likely there are additional cases where the payment is inappropriately charged to a federal award. We estimate these additional questioned costs are likely over $25,000, which is required to be reported under 2 CFR s. 200.516. Effect: UW-Madison used $650 in federal funds from the Research and Development Cluster for unallowable costs during FY 2021-22. Because unallowable costs were charged to the Research and Development Cluster, UW-Madison was not in compliance with federal requirements for the use of federal funding. Cause: UW-Madison staff indicated that the charges were applied to incorrect accounting codes when the expenses were originally recorded. For example, the $54 for facilities and maintenance expenses was charged to a federal award in the accounting system due to a limitation of certain billing codes for applying such expenses to the correct location of the work. These errors were not identified or corrected during the review of the payment or of other UW Madison monitoring activities. In December 2022 and January 2023, UW Madison corrected these accounting codes for these transactions and transferred the expenses to nonfederal projects. Recommendation: We recommend the University of Wisconsin Madison provide guidance and training to staff to ensure all costs are properly charged to federal award accounting codes and only costs allowable under federal regulations are charged to federal funds. Finding 2022-704: Research and Development Cluster?Unallowable Costs Research and Development Cluster (various Assistance Listing numbers) Award Numbers Award Years Various Various Questioned Costs: $650 Type of Finding: Noncompliance Response from the University of Wisconsin Madison: The University of Wisconsin-Madison agrees with the audit finding and recommendation.
Finding 2022 002: Inaccurate Property Management Records Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) U.S. Department of Commerce (USDOC) U.S. Department of Defense (USDOD) U.S. Director of National Intelligence (USDNI) U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (USHUD) U.S. Department of Interior (USDOI) U.S. Department of Justice (USDOJ) U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) National Science Foundation (NSF) U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs (USDVA) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) U.S. Department of Energy (USDOE) U.S. Department of Education (USDE) Smithsonian Institution U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS) Corporation for National and Community Service All Pass-Through Entities Program Name: Research and Development Cluster ALN # and Program Expenditures: Various ($482,298,931) Federal Award Numbers: Various ? See schedule of award numbers Federal Award Year: Various ? See schedule of award numbers Questioned Costs: None Compliance Requirement: Equipment Condition Found: The University did not consistently follow its property management policies and procedures related to equipment purchased with federal funding from the Research and Development (R&D) Cluster program. The University conducts research at multiple locations throughout their campus, where equipment purchased with federal funds is utilized and maintained. The University identifies all equipment in its property management records with individually assigned asset numbers and each individual asset record includes the specific location of the asset, the federal award general ledger account number that funded the purchase of the asset, and other required information. An asset tag with the assigned asset number is affixed to each asset in accordance with University policy. During our physical observation of 60 pieces of equipment purchased with R&D Cluster funds (with a total cost value of $1,542,384), we noted the following: - Nine items (with a total cost value of $200,035) did not have property management tags affixed at the time of our observation. - Eight items (with a total cost value of $103,583) had property management tags with asset numbers that were inconsistent with the equipment listing. Upon further review, we noted the property management records contained a temporary asset tag number that had not been updated for the permanent tag subsequently affixed by department personnel. Further, we noted adequate management review controls had not been established to ensure property management records were accurately updated and equipment was properly tagged. The net book value of equipment related to the R&D Cluster program totaled $217,101,257 at June 30, 2022. Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.313(d)(1), property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property, who holds title, the acquisition date, and cost of the property, percentage of Federal participation in the project costs for the Federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sale price of the property. In addition, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Effective internal controls should include procedures to ensure that accurate property records are maintained and equipment items are properly tagged. Cause: In discussing these conditions with University officials, they stated the University?s procedures for tagging equipment were delayed because the University?s personnel operated in a remote environment during fiscal years 2021 and 2022. Additionally, physical inventory procedures, which are designed detect differences between perpetual and actual information, were waived during fiscal years 2020 and 2021 as a result of the pandemic. Possible Asserted Effect: Failure to maintain accurate property records may prohibit the University from properly safeguarding and maintaining equipment and may result in federal programs not receiving the appropriate share of proceeds from the disposals of equipment purchased with federal funds. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was not reported in the prior year audit. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procedures for updating property records to ensure they accurately reflect equipment information. We also recommend the University properly tag equipment in accordance with its policy. Views of University Officials: The University agrees with the finding. All departments of the University will be reminded that tagging is an integral part of the internal control process for capital assets and training will be made available before June 30, 2023.
Finding 2022 002: Inaccurate Property Management Records Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) U.S. Department of Commerce (USDOC) U.S. Department of Defense (USDOD) U.S. Director of National Intelligence (USDNI) U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (USHUD) U.S. Department of Interior (USDOI) U.S. Department of Justice (USDOJ) U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) National Science Foundation (NSF) U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs (USDVA) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) U.S. Department of Energy (USDOE) U.S. Department of Education (USDE) Smithsonian Institution U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS) Corporation for National and Community Service All Pass-Through Entities Program Name: Research and Development Cluster ALN # and Program Expenditures: Various ($482,298,931) Federal Award Numbers: Various ? See schedule of award numbers Federal Award Year: Various ? See schedule of award numbers Questioned Costs: None Compliance Requirement: Equipment Condition Found: The University did not consistently follow its property management policies and procedures related to equipment purchased with federal funding from the Research and Development (R&D) Cluster program. The University conducts research at multiple locations throughout their campus, where equipment purchased with federal funds is utilized and maintained. The University identifies all equipment in its property management records with individually assigned asset numbers and each individual asset record includes the specific location of the asset, the federal award general ledger account number that funded the purchase of the asset, and other required information. An asset tag with the assigned asset number is affixed to each asset in accordance with University policy. During our physical observation of 60 pieces of equipment purchased with R&D Cluster funds (with a total cost value of $1,542,384), we noted the following: - Nine items (with a total cost value of $200,035) did not have property management tags affixed at the time of our observation. - Eight items (with a total cost value of $103,583) had property management tags with asset numbers that were inconsistent with the equipment listing. Upon further review, we noted the property management records contained a temporary asset tag number that had not been updated for the permanent tag subsequently affixed by department personnel. Further, we noted adequate management review controls had not been established to ensure property management records were accurately updated and equipment was properly tagged. The net book value of equipment related to the R&D Cluster program totaled $217,101,257 at June 30, 2022. Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.313(d)(1), property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property, who holds title, the acquisition date, and cost of the property, percentage of Federal participation in the project costs for the Federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sale price of the property. In addition, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Effective internal controls should include procedures to ensure that accurate property records are maintained and equipment items are properly tagged. Cause: In discussing these conditions with University officials, they stated the University?s procedures for tagging equipment were delayed because the University?s personnel operated in a remote environment during fiscal years 2021 and 2022. Additionally, physical inventory procedures, which are designed detect differences between perpetual and actual information, were waived during fiscal years 2020 and 2021 as a result of the pandemic. Possible Asserted Effect: Failure to maintain accurate property records may prohibit the University from properly safeguarding and maintaining equipment and may result in federal programs not receiving the appropriate share of proceeds from the disposals of equipment purchased with federal funds. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was not reported in the prior year audit. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procedures for updating property records to ensure they accurately reflect equipment information. We also recommend the University properly tag equipment in accordance with its policy. Views of University Officials: The University agrees with the finding. All departments of the University will be reminded that tagging is an integral part of the internal control process for capital assets and training will be made available before June 30, 2023.
Finding 2022 002: Inaccurate Property Management Records Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) U.S. Department of Commerce (USDOC) U.S. Department of Defense (USDOD) U.S. Director of National Intelligence (USDNI) U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (USHUD) U.S. Department of Interior (USDOI) U.S. Department of Justice (USDOJ) U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) National Science Foundation (NSF) U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs (USDVA) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) U.S. Department of Energy (USDOE) U.S. Department of Education (USDE) Smithsonian Institution U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS) Corporation for National and Community Service All Pass-Through Entities Program Name: Research and Development Cluster ALN # and Program Expenditures: Various ($482,298,931) Federal Award Numbers: Various ? See schedule of award numbers Federal Award Year: Various ? See schedule of award numbers Questioned Costs: None Compliance Requirement: Equipment Condition Found: The University did not consistently follow its property management policies and procedures related to equipment purchased with federal funding from the Research and Development (R&D) Cluster program. The University conducts research at multiple locations throughout their campus, where equipment purchased with federal funds is utilized and maintained. The University identifies all equipment in its property management records with individually assigned asset numbers and each individual asset record includes the specific location of the asset, the federal award general ledger account number that funded the purchase of the asset, and other required information. An asset tag with the assigned asset number is affixed to each asset in accordance with University policy. During our physical observation of 60 pieces of equipment purchased with R&D Cluster funds (with a total cost value of $1,542,384), we noted the following: - Nine items (with a total cost value of $200,035) did not have property management tags affixed at the time of our observation. - Eight items (with a total cost value of $103,583) had property management tags with asset numbers that were inconsistent with the equipment listing. Upon further review, we noted the property management records contained a temporary asset tag number that had not been updated for the permanent tag subsequently affixed by department personnel. Further, we noted adequate management review controls had not been established to ensure property management records were accurately updated and equipment was properly tagged. The net book value of equipment related to the R&D Cluster program totaled $217,101,257 at June 30, 2022. Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.313(d)(1), property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property, who holds title, the acquisition date, and cost of the property, percentage of Federal participation in the project costs for the Federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sale price of the property. In addition, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Effective internal controls should include procedures to ensure that accurate property records are maintained and equipment items are properly tagged. Cause: In discussing these conditions with University officials, they stated the University?s procedures for tagging equipment were delayed because the University?s personnel operated in a remote environment during fiscal years 2021 and 2022. Additionally, physical inventory procedures, which are designed detect differences between perpetual and actual information, were waived during fiscal years 2020 and 2021 as a result of the pandemic. Possible Asserted Effect: Failure to maintain accurate property records may prohibit the University from properly safeguarding and maintaining equipment and may result in federal programs not receiving the appropriate share of proceeds from the disposals of equipment purchased with federal funds. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was not reported in the prior year audit. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procedures for updating property records to ensure they accurately reflect equipment information. We also recommend the University properly tag equipment in accordance with its policy. Views of University Officials: The University agrees with the finding. All departments of the University will be reminded that tagging is an integral part of the internal control process for capital assets and training will be made available before June 30, 2023.
Finding 2022 002: Inaccurate Property Management Records Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) U.S. Department of Commerce (USDOC) U.S. Department of Defense (USDOD) U.S. Director of National Intelligence (USDNI) U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (USHUD) U.S. Department of Interior (USDOI) U.S. Department of Justice (USDOJ) U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) National Science Foundation (NSF) U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs (USDVA) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) U.S. Department of Energy (USDOE) U.S. Department of Education (USDE) Smithsonian Institution U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS) Corporation for National and Community Service All Pass-Through Entities Program Name: Research and Development Cluster ALN # and Program Expenditures: Various ($482,298,931) Federal Award Numbers: Various ? See schedule of award numbers Federal Award Year: Various ? See schedule of award numbers Questioned Costs: None Compliance Requirement: Equipment Condition Found: The University did not consistently follow its property management policies and procedures related to equipment purchased with federal funding from the Research and Development (R&D) Cluster program. The University conducts research at multiple locations throughout their campus, where equipment purchased with federal funds is utilized and maintained. The University identifies all equipment in its property management records with individually assigned asset numbers and each individual asset record includes the specific location of the asset, the federal award general ledger account number that funded the purchase of the asset, and other required information. An asset tag with the assigned asset number is affixed to each asset in accordance with University policy. During our physical observation of 60 pieces of equipment purchased with R&D Cluster funds (with a total cost value of $1,542,384), we noted the following: - Nine items (with a total cost value of $200,035) did not have property management tags affixed at the time of our observation. - Eight items (with a total cost value of $103,583) had property management tags with asset numbers that were inconsistent with the equipment listing. Upon further review, we noted the property management records contained a temporary asset tag number that had not been updated for the permanent tag subsequently affixed by department personnel. Further, we noted adequate management review controls had not been established to ensure property management records were accurately updated and equipment was properly tagged. The net book value of equipment related to the R&D Cluster program totaled $217,101,257 at June 30, 2022. Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.313(d)(1), property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property, who holds title, the acquisition date, and cost of the property, percentage of Federal participation in the project costs for the Federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sale price of the property. In addition, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Effective internal controls should include procedures to ensure that accurate property records are maintained and equipment items are properly tagged. Cause: In discussing these conditions with University officials, they stated the University?s procedures for tagging equipment were delayed because the University?s personnel operated in a remote environment during fiscal years 2021 and 2022. Additionally, physical inventory procedures, which are designed detect differences between perpetual and actual information, were waived during fiscal years 2020 and 2021 as a result of the pandemic. Possible Asserted Effect: Failure to maintain accurate property records may prohibit the University from properly safeguarding and maintaining equipment and may result in federal programs not receiving the appropriate share of proceeds from the disposals of equipment purchased with federal funds. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was not reported in the prior year audit. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procedures for updating property records to ensure they accurately reflect equipment information. We also recommend the University properly tag equipment in accordance with its policy. Views of University Officials: The University agrees with the finding. All departments of the University will be reminded that tagging is an integral part of the internal control process for capital assets and training will be made available before June 30, 2023.
Finding 2022 002: Inaccurate Property Management Records Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) U.S. Department of Commerce (USDOC) U.S. Department of Defense (USDOD) U.S. Director of National Intelligence (USDNI) U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (USHUD) U.S. Department of Interior (USDOI) U.S. Department of Justice (USDOJ) U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) National Science Foundation (NSF) U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs (USDVA) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) U.S. Department of Energy (USDOE) U.S. Department of Education (USDE) Smithsonian Institution U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS) Corporation for National and Community Service All Pass-Through Entities Program Name: Research and Development Cluster ALN # and Program Expenditures: Various ($482,298,931) Federal Award Numbers: Various ? See schedule of award numbers Federal Award Year: Various ? See schedule of award numbers Questioned Costs: None Compliance Requirement: Equipment Condition Found: The University did not consistently follow its property management policies and procedures related to equipment purchased with federal funding from the Research and Development (R&D) Cluster program. The University conducts research at multiple locations throughout their campus, where equipment purchased with federal funds is utilized and maintained. The University identifies all equipment in its property management records with individually assigned asset numbers and each individual asset record includes the specific location of the asset, the federal award general ledger account number that funded the purchase of the asset, and other required information. An asset tag with the assigned asset number is affixed to each asset in accordance with University policy. During our physical observation of 60 pieces of equipment purchased with R&D Cluster funds (with a total cost value of $1,542,384), we noted the following: - Nine items (with a total cost value of $200,035) did not have property management tags affixed at the time of our observation. - Eight items (with a total cost value of $103,583) had property management tags with asset numbers that were inconsistent with the equipment listing. Upon further review, we noted the property management records contained a temporary asset tag number that had not been updated for the permanent tag subsequently affixed by department personnel. Further, we noted adequate management review controls had not been established to ensure property management records were accurately updated and equipment was properly tagged. The net book value of equipment related to the R&D Cluster program totaled $217,101,257 at June 30, 2022. Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.313(d)(1), property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property, who holds title, the acquisition date, and cost of the property, percentage of Federal participation in the project costs for the Federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sale price of the property. In addition, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Effective internal controls should include procedures to ensure that accurate property records are maintained and equipment items are properly tagged. Cause: In discussing these conditions with University officials, they stated the University?s procedures for tagging equipment were delayed because the University?s personnel operated in a remote environment during fiscal years 2021 and 2022. Additionally, physical inventory procedures, which are designed detect differences between perpetual and actual information, were waived during fiscal years 2020 and 2021 as a result of the pandemic. Possible Asserted Effect: Failure to maintain accurate property records may prohibit the University from properly safeguarding and maintaining equipment and may result in federal programs not receiving the appropriate share of proceeds from the disposals of equipment purchased with federal funds. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was not reported in the prior year audit. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procedures for updating property records to ensure they accurately reflect equipment information. We also recommend the University properly tag equipment in accordance with its policy. Views of University Officials: The University agrees with the finding. All departments of the University will be reminded that tagging is an integral part of the internal control process for capital assets and training will be made available before June 30, 2023.
Finding 2022 002: Inaccurate Property Management Records Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) U.S. Department of Commerce (USDOC) U.S. Department of Defense (USDOD) U.S. Director of National Intelligence (USDNI) U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (USHUD) U.S. Department of Interior (USDOI) U.S. Department of Justice (USDOJ) U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) National Science Foundation (NSF) U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs (USDVA) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) U.S. Department of Energy (USDOE) U.S. Department of Education (USDE) Smithsonian Institution U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS) Corporation for National and Community Service All Pass-Through Entities Program Name: Research and Development Cluster ALN # and Program Expenditures: Various ($482,298,931) Federal Award Numbers: Various ? See schedule of award numbers Federal Award Year: Various ? See schedule of award numbers Questioned Costs: None Compliance Requirement: Equipment Condition Found: The University did not consistently follow its property management policies and procedures related to equipment purchased with federal funding from the Research and Development (R&D) Cluster program. The University conducts research at multiple locations throughout their campus, where equipment purchased with federal funds is utilized and maintained. The University identifies all equipment in its property management records with individually assigned asset numbers and each individual asset record includes the specific location of the asset, the federal award general ledger account number that funded the purchase of the asset, and other required information. An asset tag with the assigned asset number is affixed to each asset in accordance with University policy. During our physical observation of 60 pieces of equipment purchased with R&D Cluster funds (with a total cost value of $1,542,384), we noted the following: - Nine items (with a total cost value of $200,035) did not have property management tags affixed at the time of our observation. - Eight items (with a total cost value of $103,583) had property management tags with asset numbers that were inconsistent with the equipment listing. Upon further review, we noted the property management records contained a temporary asset tag number that had not been updated for the permanent tag subsequently affixed by department personnel. Further, we noted adequate management review controls had not been established to ensure property management records were accurately updated and equipment was properly tagged. The net book value of equipment related to the R&D Cluster program totaled $217,101,257 at June 30, 2022. Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.313(d)(1), property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property, who holds title, the acquisition date, and cost of the property, percentage of Federal participation in the project costs for the Federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sale price of the property. In addition, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Effective internal controls should include procedures to ensure that accurate property records are maintained and equipment items are properly tagged. Cause: In discussing these conditions with University officials, they stated the University?s procedures for tagging equipment were delayed because the University?s personnel operated in a remote environment during fiscal years 2021 and 2022. Additionally, physical inventory procedures, which are designed detect differences between perpetual and actual information, were waived during fiscal years 2020 and 2021 as a result of the pandemic. Possible Asserted Effect: Failure to maintain accurate property records may prohibit the University from properly safeguarding and maintaining equipment and may result in federal programs not receiving the appropriate share of proceeds from the disposals of equipment purchased with federal funds. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was not reported in the prior year audit. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procedures for updating property records to ensure they accurately reflect equipment information. We also recommend the University properly tag equipment in accordance with its policy. Views of University Officials: The University agrees with the finding. All departments of the University will be reminded that tagging is an integral part of the internal control process for capital assets and training will be made available before June 30, 2023.
Finding 2022 002: Inaccurate Property Management Records Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) U.S. Department of Commerce (USDOC) U.S. Department of Defense (USDOD) U.S. Director of National Intelligence (USDNI) U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (USHUD) U.S. Department of Interior (USDOI) U.S. Department of Justice (USDOJ) U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) National Science Foundation (NSF) U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs (USDVA) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) U.S. Department of Energy (USDOE) U.S. Department of Education (USDE) Smithsonian Institution U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS) Corporation for National and Community Service All Pass-Through Entities Program Name: Research and Development Cluster ALN # and Program Expenditures: Various ($482,298,931) Federal Award Numbers: Various ? See schedule of award numbers Federal Award Year: Various ? See schedule of award numbers Questioned Costs: None Compliance Requirement: Equipment Condition Found: The University did not consistently follow its property management policies and procedures related to equipment purchased with federal funding from the Research and Development (R&D) Cluster program. The University conducts research at multiple locations throughout their campus, where equipment purchased with federal funds is utilized and maintained. The University identifies all equipment in its property management records with individually assigned asset numbers and each individual asset record includes the specific location of the asset, the federal award general ledger account number that funded the purchase of the asset, and other required information. An asset tag with the assigned asset number is affixed to each asset in accordance with University policy. During our physical observation of 60 pieces of equipment purchased with R&D Cluster funds (with a total cost value of $1,542,384), we noted the following: - Nine items (with a total cost value of $200,035) did not have property management tags affixed at the time of our observation. - Eight items (with a total cost value of $103,583) had property management tags with asset numbers that were inconsistent with the equipment listing. Upon further review, we noted the property management records contained a temporary asset tag number that had not been updated for the permanent tag subsequently affixed by department personnel. Further, we noted adequate management review controls had not been established to ensure property management records were accurately updated and equipment was properly tagged. The net book value of equipment related to the R&D Cluster program totaled $217,101,257 at June 30, 2022. Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.313(d)(1), property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property, who holds title, the acquisition date, and cost of the property, percentage of Federal participation in the project costs for the Federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sale price of the property. In addition, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Effective internal controls should include procedures to ensure that accurate property records are maintained and equipment items are properly tagged. Cause: In discussing these conditions with University officials, they stated the University?s procedures for tagging equipment were delayed because the University?s personnel operated in a remote environment during fiscal years 2021 and 2022. Additionally, physical inventory procedures, which are designed detect differences between perpetual and actual information, were waived during fiscal years 2020 and 2021 as a result of the pandemic. Possible Asserted Effect: Failure to maintain accurate property records may prohibit the University from properly safeguarding and maintaining equipment and may result in federal programs not receiving the appropriate share of proceeds from the disposals of equipment purchased with federal funds. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was not reported in the prior year audit. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procedures for updating property records to ensure they accurately reflect equipment information. We also recommend the University properly tag equipment in accordance with its policy. Views of University Officials: The University agrees with the finding. All departments of the University will be reminded that tagging is an integral part of the internal control process for capital assets and training will be made available before June 30, 2023.
Finding 2022 002: Inaccurate Property Management Records Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) U.S. Department of Commerce (USDOC) U.S. Department of Defense (USDOD) U.S. Director of National Intelligence (USDNI) U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (USHUD) U.S. Department of Interior (USDOI) U.S. Department of Justice (USDOJ) U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) National Science Foundation (NSF) U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs (USDVA) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) U.S. Department of Energy (USDOE) U.S. Department of Education (USDE) Smithsonian Institution U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS) Corporation for National and Community Service All Pass-Through Entities Program Name: Research and Development Cluster ALN # and Program Expenditures: Various ($482,298,931) Federal Award Numbers: Various ? See schedule of award numbers Federal Award Year: Various ? See schedule of award numbers Questioned Costs: None Compliance Requirement: Equipment Condition Found: The University did not consistently follow its property management policies and procedures related to equipment purchased with federal funding from the Research and Development (R&D) Cluster program. The University conducts research at multiple locations throughout their campus, where equipment purchased with federal funds is utilized and maintained. The University identifies all equipment in its property management records with individually assigned asset numbers and each individual asset record includes the specific location of the asset, the federal award general ledger account number that funded the purchase of the asset, and other required information. An asset tag with the assigned asset number is affixed to each asset in accordance with University policy. During our physical observation of 60 pieces of equipment purchased with R&D Cluster funds (with a total cost value of $1,542,384), we noted the following: - Nine items (with a total cost value of $200,035) did not have property management tags affixed at the time of our observation. - Eight items (with a total cost value of $103,583) had property management tags with asset numbers that were inconsistent with the equipment listing. Upon further review, we noted the property management records contained a temporary asset tag number that had not been updated for the permanent tag subsequently affixed by department personnel. Further, we noted adequate management review controls had not been established to ensure property management records were accurately updated and equipment was properly tagged. The net book value of equipment related to the R&D Cluster program totaled $217,101,257 at June 30, 2022. Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.313(d)(1), property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property, who holds title, the acquisition date, and cost of the property, percentage of Federal participation in the project costs for the Federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sale price of the property. In addition, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Effective internal controls should include procedures to ensure that accurate property records are maintained and equipment items are properly tagged. Cause: In discussing these conditions with University officials, they stated the University?s procedures for tagging equipment were delayed because the University?s personnel operated in a remote environment during fiscal years 2021 and 2022. Additionally, physical inventory procedures, which are designed detect differences between perpetual and actual information, were waived during fiscal years 2020 and 2021 as a result of the pandemic. Possible Asserted Effect: Failure to maintain accurate property records may prohibit the University from properly safeguarding and maintaining equipment and may result in federal programs not receiving the appropriate share of proceeds from the disposals of equipment purchased with federal funds. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was not reported in the prior year audit. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procedures for updating property records to ensure they accurately reflect equipment information. We also recommend the University properly tag equipment in accordance with its policy. Views of University Officials: The University agrees with the finding. All departments of the University will be reminded that tagging is an integral part of the internal control process for capital assets and training will be made available before June 30, 2023.
Finding 2022 002: Inaccurate Property Management Records Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) U.S. Department of Commerce (USDOC) U.S. Department of Defense (USDOD) U.S. Director of National Intelligence (USDNI) U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (USHUD) U.S. Department of Interior (USDOI) U.S. Department of Justice (USDOJ) U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) National Science Foundation (NSF) U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs (USDVA) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) U.S. Department of Energy (USDOE) U.S. Department of Education (USDE) Smithsonian Institution U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS) Corporation for National and Community Service All Pass-Through Entities Program Name: Research and Development Cluster ALN # and Program Expenditures: Various ($482,298,931) Federal Award Numbers: Various ? See schedule of award numbers Federal Award Year: Various ? See schedule of award numbers Questioned Costs: None Compliance Requirement: Equipment Condition Found: The University did not consistently follow its property management policies and procedures related to equipment purchased with federal funding from the Research and Development (R&D) Cluster program. The University conducts research at multiple locations throughout their campus, where equipment purchased with federal funds is utilized and maintained. The University identifies all equipment in its property management records with individually assigned asset numbers and each individual asset record includes the specific location of the asset, the federal award general ledger account number that funded the purchase of the asset, and other required information. An asset tag with the assigned asset number is affixed to each asset in accordance with University policy. During our physical observation of 60 pieces of equipment purchased with R&D Cluster funds (with a total cost value of $1,542,384), we noted the following: - Nine items (with a total cost value of $200,035) did not have property management tags affixed at the time of our observation. - Eight items (with a total cost value of $103,583) had property management tags with asset numbers that were inconsistent with the equipment listing. Upon further review, we noted the property management records contained a temporary asset tag number that had not been updated for the permanent tag subsequently affixed by department personnel. Further, we noted adequate management review controls had not been established to ensure property management records were accurately updated and equipment was properly tagged. The net book value of equipment related to the R&D Cluster program totaled $217,101,257 at June 30, 2022. Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.313(d)(1), property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property, who holds title, the acquisition date, and cost of the property, percentage of Federal participation in the project costs for the Federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sale price of the property. In addition, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Effective internal controls should include procedures to ensure that accurate property records are maintained and equipment items are properly tagged. Cause: In discussing these conditions with University officials, they stated the University?s procedures for tagging equipment were delayed because the University?s personnel operated in a remote environment during fiscal years 2021 and 2022. Additionally, physical inventory procedures, which are designed detect differences between perpetual and actual information, were waived during fiscal years 2020 and 2021 as a result of the pandemic. Possible Asserted Effect: Failure to maintain accurate property records may prohibit the University from properly safeguarding and maintaining equipment and may result in federal programs not receiving the appropriate share of proceeds from the disposals of equipment purchased with federal funds. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was not reported in the prior year audit. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procedures for updating property records to ensure they accurately reflect equipment information. We also recommend the University properly tag equipment in accordance with its policy. Views of University Officials: The University agrees with the finding. All departments of the University will be reminded that tagging is an integral part of the internal control process for capital assets and training will be made available before June 30, 2023.
Finding 2022 002: Inaccurate Property Management Records Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) U.S. Department of Commerce (USDOC) U.S. Department of Defense (USDOD) U.S. Director of National Intelligence (USDNI) U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (USHUD) U.S. Department of Interior (USDOI) U.S. Department of Justice (USDOJ) U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) National Science Foundation (NSF) U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs (USDVA) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) U.S. Department of Energy (USDOE) U.S. Department of Education (USDE) Smithsonian Institution U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS) Corporation for National and Community Service All Pass-Through Entities Program Name: Research and Development Cluster ALN # and Program Expenditures: Various ($482,298,931) Federal Award Numbers: Various ? See schedule of award numbers Federal Award Year: Various ? See schedule of award numbers Questioned Costs: None Compliance Requirement: Equipment Condition Found: The University did not consistently follow its property management policies and procedures related to equipment purchased with federal funding from the Research and Development (R&D) Cluster program. The University conducts research at multiple locations throughout their campus, where equipment purchased with federal funds is utilized and maintained. The University identifies all equipment in its property management records with individually assigned asset numbers and each individual asset record includes the specific location of the asset, the federal award general ledger account number that funded the purchase of the asset, and other required information. An asset tag with the assigned asset number is affixed to each asset in accordance with University policy. During our physical observation of 60 pieces of equipment purchased with R&D Cluster funds (with a total cost value of $1,542,384), we noted the following: - Nine items (with a total cost value of $200,035) did not have property management tags affixed at the time of our observation. - Eight items (with a total cost value of $103,583) had property management tags with asset numbers that were inconsistent with the equipment listing. Upon further review, we noted the property management records contained a temporary asset tag number that had not been updated for the permanent tag subsequently affixed by department personnel. Further, we noted adequate management review controls had not been established to ensure property management records were accurately updated and equipment was properly tagged. The net book value of equipment related to the R&D Cluster program totaled $217,101,257 at June 30, 2022. Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.313(d)(1), property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property, who holds title, the acquisition date, and cost of the property, percentage of Federal participation in the project costs for the Federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sale price of the property. In addition, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Effective internal controls should include procedures to ensure that accurate property records are maintained and equipment items are properly tagged. Cause: In discussing these conditions with University officials, they stated the University?s procedures for tagging equipment were delayed because the University?s personnel operated in a remote environment during fiscal years 2021 and 2022. Additionally, physical inventory procedures, which are designed detect differences between perpetual and actual information, were waived during fiscal years 2020 and 2021 as a result of the pandemic. Possible Asserted Effect: Failure to maintain accurate property records may prohibit the University from properly safeguarding and maintaining equipment and may result in federal programs not receiving the appropriate share of proceeds from the disposals of equipment purchased with federal funds. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was not reported in the prior year audit. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procedures for updating property records to ensure they accurately reflect equipment information. We also recommend the University properly tag equipment in accordance with its policy. Views of University Officials: The University agrees with the finding. All departments of the University will be reminded that tagging is an integral part of the internal control process for capital assets and training will be made available before June 30, 2023.
Finding 2022 002: Inaccurate Property Management Records Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) U.S. Department of Commerce (USDOC) U.S. Department of Defense (USDOD) U.S. Director of National Intelligence (USDNI) U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (USHUD) U.S. Department of Interior (USDOI) U.S. Department of Justice (USDOJ) U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) National Science Foundation (NSF) U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs (USDVA) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) U.S. Department of Energy (USDOE) U.S. Department of Education (USDE) Smithsonian Institution U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS) Corporation for National and Community Service All Pass-Through Entities Program Name: Research and Development Cluster ALN # and Program Expenditures: Various ($482,298,931) Federal Award Numbers: Various ? See schedule of award numbers Federal Award Year: Various ? See schedule of award numbers Questioned Costs: None Compliance Requirement: Equipment Condition Found: The University did not consistently follow its property management policies and procedures related to equipment purchased with federal funding from the Research and Development (R&D) Cluster program. The University conducts research at multiple locations throughout their campus, where equipment purchased with federal funds is utilized and maintained. The University identifies all equipment in its property management records with individually assigned asset numbers and each individual asset record includes the specific location of the asset, the federal award general ledger account number that funded the purchase of the asset, and other required information. An asset tag with the assigned asset number is affixed to each asset in accordance with University policy. During our physical observation of 60 pieces of equipment purchased with R&D Cluster funds (with a total cost value of $1,542,384), we noted the following: - Nine items (with a total cost value of $200,035) did not have property management tags affixed at the time of our observation. - Eight items (with a total cost value of $103,583) had property management tags with asset numbers that were inconsistent with the equipment listing. Upon further review, we noted the property management records contained a temporary asset tag number that had not been updated for the permanent tag subsequently affixed by department personnel. Further, we noted adequate management review controls had not been established to ensure property management records were accurately updated and equipment was properly tagged. The net book value of equipment related to the R&D Cluster program totaled $217,101,257 at June 30, 2022. Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.313(d)(1), property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property, who holds title, the acquisition date, and cost of the property, percentage of Federal participation in the project costs for the Federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sale price of the property. In addition, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Effective internal controls should include procedures to ensure that accurate property records are maintained and equipment items are properly tagged. Cause: In discussing these conditions with University officials, they stated the University?s procedures for tagging equipment were delayed because the University?s personnel operated in a remote environment during fiscal years 2021 and 2022. Additionally, physical inventory procedures, which are designed detect differences between perpetual and actual information, were waived during fiscal years 2020 and 2021 as a result of the pandemic. Possible Asserted Effect: Failure to maintain accurate property records may prohibit the University from properly safeguarding and maintaining equipment and may result in federal programs not receiving the appropriate share of proceeds from the disposals of equipment purchased with federal funds. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was not reported in the prior year audit. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procedures for updating property records to ensure they accurately reflect equipment information. We also recommend the University properly tag equipment in accordance with its policy. Views of University Officials: The University agrees with the finding. All departments of the University will be reminded that tagging is an integral part of the internal control process for capital assets and training will be made available before June 30, 2023.
Finding 2022 002: Inaccurate Property Management Records Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) U.S. Department of Commerce (USDOC) U.S. Department of Defense (USDOD) U.S. Director of National Intelligence (USDNI) U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (USHUD) U.S. Department of Interior (USDOI) U.S. Department of Justice (USDOJ) U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) National Science Foundation (NSF) U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs (USDVA) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) U.S. Department of Energy (USDOE) U.S. Department of Education (USDE) Smithsonian Institution U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS) Corporation for National and Community Service All Pass-Through Entities Program Name: Research and Development Cluster ALN # and Program Expenditures: Various ($482,298,931) Federal Award Numbers: Various ? See schedule of award numbers Federal Award Year: Various ? See schedule of award numbers Questioned Costs: None Compliance Requirement: Equipment Condition Found: The University did not consistently follow its property management policies and procedures related to equipment purchased with federal funding from the Research and Development (R&D) Cluster program. The University conducts research at multiple locations throughout their campus, where equipment purchased with federal funds is utilized and maintained. The University identifies all equipment in its property management records with individually assigned asset numbers and each individual asset record includes the specific location of the asset, the federal award general ledger account number that funded the purchase of the asset, and other required information. An asset tag with the assigned asset number is affixed to each asset in accordance with University policy. During our physical observation of 60 pieces of equipment purchased with R&D Cluster funds (with a total cost value of $1,542,384), we noted the following: - Nine items (with a total cost value of $200,035) did not have property management tags affixed at the time of our observation. - Eight items (with a total cost value of $103,583) had property management tags with asset numbers that were inconsistent with the equipment listing. Upon further review, we noted the property management records contained a temporary asset tag number that had not been updated for the permanent tag subsequently affixed by department personnel. Further, we noted adequate management review controls had not been established to ensure property management records were accurately updated and equipment was properly tagged. The net book value of equipment related to the R&D Cluster program totaled $217,101,257 at June 30, 2022. Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.313(d)(1), property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property, who holds title, the acquisition date, and cost of the property, percentage of Federal participation in the project costs for the Federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sale price of the property. In addition, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Effective internal controls should include procedures to ensure that accurate property records are maintained and equipment items are properly tagged. Cause: In discussing these conditions with University officials, they stated the University?s procedures for tagging equipment were delayed because the University?s personnel operated in a remote environment during fiscal years 2021 and 2022. Additionally, physical inventory procedures, which are designed detect differences between perpetual and actual information, were waived during fiscal years 2020 and 2021 as a result of the pandemic. Possible Asserted Effect: Failure to maintain accurate property records may prohibit the University from properly safeguarding and maintaining equipment and may result in federal programs not receiving the appropriate share of proceeds from the disposals of equipment purchased with federal funds. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was not reported in the prior year audit. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procedures for updating property records to ensure they accurately reflect equipment information. We also recommend the University properly tag equipment in accordance with its policy. Views of University Officials: The University agrees with the finding. All departments of the University will be reminded that tagging is an integral part of the internal control process for capital assets and training will be made available before June 30, 2023.
Finding 2022 002: Inaccurate Property Management Records Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) U.S. Department of Commerce (USDOC) U.S. Department of Defense (USDOD) U.S. Director of National Intelligence (USDNI) U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (USHUD) U.S. Department of Interior (USDOI) U.S. Department of Justice (USDOJ) U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) National Science Foundation (NSF) U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs (USDVA) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) U.S. Department of Energy (USDOE) U.S. Department of Education (USDE) Smithsonian Institution U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS) Corporation for National and Community Service All Pass-Through Entities Program Name: Research and Development Cluster ALN # and Program Expenditures: Various ($482,298,931) Federal Award Numbers: Various ? See schedule of award numbers Federal Award Year: Various ? See schedule of award numbers Questioned Costs: None Compliance Requirement: Equipment Condition Found: The University did not consistently follow its property management policies and procedures related to equipment purchased with federal funding from the Research and Development (R&D) Cluster program. The University conducts research at multiple locations throughout their campus, where equipment purchased with federal funds is utilized and maintained. The University identifies all equipment in its property management records with individually assigned asset numbers and each individual asset record includes the specific location of the asset, the federal award general ledger account number that funded the purchase of the asset, and other required information. An asset tag with the assigned asset number is affixed to each asset in accordance with University policy. During our physical observation of 60 pieces of equipment purchased with R&D Cluster funds (with a total cost value of $1,542,384), we noted the following: - Nine items (with a total cost value of $200,035) did not have property management tags affixed at the time of our observation. - Eight items (with a total cost value of $103,583) had property management tags with asset numbers that were inconsistent with the equipment listing. Upon further review, we noted the property management records contained a temporary asset tag number that had not been updated for the permanent tag subsequently affixed by department personnel. Further, we noted adequate management review controls had not been established to ensure property management records were accurately updated and equipment was properly tagged. The net book value of equipment related to the R&D Cluster program totaled $217,101,257 at June 30, 2022. Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.313(d)(1), property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property, who holds title, the acquisition date, and cost of the property, percentage of Federal participation in the project costs for the Federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sale price of the property. In addition, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Effective internal controls should include procedures to ensure that accurate property records are maintained and equipment items are properly tagged. Cause: In discussing these conditions with University officials, they stated the University?s procedures for tagging equipment were delayed because the University?s personnel operated in a remote environment during fiscal years 2021 and 2022. Additionally, physical inventory procedures, which are designed detect differences between perpetual and actual information, were waived during fiscal years 2020 and 2021 as a result of the pandemic. Possible Asserted Effect: Failure to maintain accurate property records may prohibit the University from properly safeguarding and maintaining equipment and may result in federal programs not receiving the appropriate share of proceeds from the disposals of equipment purchased with federal funds. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was not reported in the prior year audit. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procedures for updating property records to ensure they accurately reflect equipment information. We also recommend the University properly tag equipment in accordance with its policy. Views of University Officials: The University agrees with the finding. All departments of the University will be reminded that tagging is an integral part of the internal control process for capital assets and training will be made available before June 30, 2023.
Finding 2022 002: Inaccurate Property Management Records Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) U.S. Department of Commerce (USDOC) U.S. Department of Defense (USDOD) U.S. Director of National Intelligence (USDNI) U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (USHUD) U.S. Department of Interior (USDOI) U.S. Department of Justice (USDOJ) U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) National Science Foundation (NSF) U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs (USDVA) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) U.S. Department of Energy (USDOE) U.S. Department of Education (USDE) Smithsonian Institution U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS) Corporation for National and Community Service All Pass-Through Entities Program Name: Research and Development Cluster ALN # and Program Expenditures: Various ($482,298,931) Federal Award Numbers: Various ? See schedule of award numbers Federal Award Year: Various ? See schedule of award numbers Questioned Costs: None Compliance Requirement: Equipment Condition Found: The University did not consistently follow its property management policies and procedures related to equipment purchased with federal funding from the Research and Development (R&D) Cluster program. The University conducts research at multiple locations throughout their campus, where equipment purchased with federal funds is utilized and maintained. The University identifies all equipment in its property management records with individually assigned asset numbers and each individual asset record includes the specific location of the asset, the federal award general ledger account number that funded the purchase of the asset, and other required information. An asset tag with the assigned asset number is affixed to each asset in accordance with University policy. During our physical observation of 60 pieces of equipment purchased with R&D Cluster funds (with a total cost value of $1,542,384), we noted the following: - Nine items (with a total cost value of $200,035) did not have property management tags affixed at the time of our observation. - Eight items (with a total cost value of $103,583) had property management tags with asset numbers that were inconsistent with the equipment listing. Upon further review, we noted the property management records contained a temporary asset tag number that had not been updated for the permanent tag subsequently affixed by department personnel. Further, we noted adequate management review controls had not been established to ensure property management records were accurately updated and equipment was properly tagged. The net book value of equipment related to the R&D Cluster program totaled $217,101,257 at June 30, 2022. Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.313(d)(1), property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property, who holds title, the acquisition date, and cost of the property, percentage of Federal participation in the project costs for the Federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sale price of the property. In addition, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Effective internal controls should include procedures to ensure that accurate property records are maintained and equipment items are properly tagged. Cause: In discussing these conditions with University officials, they stated the University?s procedures for tagging equipment were delayed because the University?s personnel operated in a remote environment during fiscal years 2021 and 2022. Additionally, physical inventory procedures, which are designed detect differences between perpetual and actual information, were waived during fiscal years 2020 and 2021 as a result of the pandemic. Possible Asserted Effect: Failure to maintain accurate property records may prohibit the University from properly safeguarding and maintaining equipment and may result in federal programs not receiving the appropriate share of proceeds from the disposals of equipment purchased with federal funds. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was not reported in the prior year audit. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procedures for updating property records to ensure they accurately reflect equipment information. We also recommend the University properly tag equipment in accordance with its policy. Views of University Officials: The University agrees with the finding. All departments of the University will be reminded that tagging is an integral part of the internal control process for capital assets and training will be made available before June 30, 2023.
Finding 2022 002: Inaccurate Property Management Records Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) U.S. Department of Commerce (USDOC) U.S. Department of Defense (USDOD) U.S. Director of National Intelligence (USDNI) U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (USHUD) U.S. Department of Interior (USDOI) U.S. Department of Justice (USDOJ) U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) National Science Foundation (NSF) U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs (USDVA) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) U.S. Department of Energy (USDOE) U.S. Department of Education (USDE) Smithsonian Institution U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS) Corporation for National and Community Service All Pass-Through Entities Program Name: Research and Development Cluster ALN # and Program Expenditures: Various ($482,298,931) Federal Award Numbers: Various ? See schedule of award numbers Federal Award Year: Various ? See schedule of award numbers Questioned Costs: None Compliance Requirement: Equipment Condition Found: The University did not consistently follow its property management policies and procedures related to equipment purchased with federal funding from the Research and Development (R&D) Cluster program. The University conducts research at multiple locations throughout their campus, where equipment purchased with federal funds is utilized and maintained. The University identifies all equipment in its property management records with individually assigned asset numbers and each individual asset record includes the specific location of the asset, the federal award general ledger account number that funded the purchase of the asset, and other required information. An asset tag with the assigned asset number is affixed to each asset in accordance with University policy. During our physical observation of 60 pieces of equipment purchased with R&D Cluster funds (with a total cost value of $1,542,384), we noted the following: - Nine items (with a total cost value of $200,035) did not have property management tags affixed at the time of our observation. - Eight items (with a total cost value of $103,583) had property management tags with asset numbers that were inconsistent with the equipment listing. Upon further review, we noted the property management records contained a temporary asset tag number that had not been updated for the permanent tag subsequently affixed by department personnel. Further, we noted adequate management review controls had not been established to ensure property management records were accurately updated and equipment was properly tagged. The net book value of equipment related to the R&D Cluster program totaled $217,101,257 at June 30, 2022. Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.313(d)(1), property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property, who holds title, the acquisition date, and cost of the property, percentage of Federal participation in the project costs for the Federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sale price of the property. In addition, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Effective internal controls should include procedures to ensure that accurate property records are maintained and equipment items are properly tagged. Cause: In discussing these conditions with University officials, they stated the University?s procedures for tagging equipment were delayed because the University?s personnel operated in a remote environment during fiscal years 2021 and 2022. Additionally, physical inventory procedures, which are designed detect differences between perpetual and actual information, were waived during fiscal years 2020 and 2021 as a result of the pandemic. Possible Asserted Effect: Failure to maintain accurate property records may prohibit the University from properly safeguarding and maintaining equipment and may result in federal programs not receiving the appropriate share of proceeds from the disposals of equipment purchased with federal funds. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was not reported in the prior year audit. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procedures for updating property records to ensure they accurately reflect equipment information. We also recommend the University properly tag equipment in accordance with its policy. Views of University Officials: The University agrees with the finding. All departments of the University will be reminded that tagging is an integral part of the internal control process for capital assets and training will be made available before June 30, 2023.
Finding 2022 002: Inaccurate Property Management Records Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) U.S. Department of Commerce (USDOC) U.S. Department of Defense (USDOD) U.S. Director of National Intelligence (USDNI) U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (USHUD) U.S. Department of Interior (USDOI) U.S. Department of Justice (USDOJ) U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) National Science Foundation (NSF) U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs (USDVA) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) U.S. Department of Energy (USDOE) U.S. Department of Education (USDE) Smithsonian Institution U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS) Corporation for National and Community Service All Pass-Through Entities Program Name: Research and Development Cluster ALN # and Program Expenditures: Various ($482,298,931) Federal Award Numbers: Various ? See schedule of award numbers Federal Award Year: Various ? See schedule of award numbers Questioned Costs: None Compliance Requirement: Equipment Condition Found: The University did not consistently follow its property management policies and procedures related to equipment purchased with federal funding from the Research and Development (R&D) Cluster program. The University conducts research at multiple locations throughout their campus, where equipment purchased with federal funds is utilized and maintained. The University identifies all equipment in its property management records with individually assigned asset numbers and each individual asset record includes the specific location of the asset, the federal award general ledger account number that funded the purchase of the asset, and other required information. An asset tag with the assigned asset number is affixed to each asset in accordance with University policy. During our physical observation of 60 pieces of equipment purchased with R&D Cluster funds (with a total cost value of $1,542,384), we noted the following: - Nine items (with a total cost value of $200,035) did not have property management tags affixed at the time of our observation. - Eight items (with a total cost value of $103,583) had property management tags with asset numbers that were inconsistent with the equipment listing. Upon further review, we noted the property management records contained a temporary asset tag number that had not been updated for the permanent tag subsequently affixed by department personnel. Further, we noted adequate management review controls had not been established to ensure property management records were accurately updated and equipment was properly tagged. The net book value of equipment related to the R&D Cluster program totaled $217,101,257 at June 30, 2022. Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.313(d)(1), property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property, who holds title, the acquisition date, and cost of the property, percentage of Federal participation in the project costs for the Federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sale price of the property. In addition, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Effective internal controls should include procedures to ensure that accurate property records are maintained and equipment items are properly tagged. Cause: In discussing these conditions with University officials, they stated the University?s procedures for tagging equipment were delayed because the University?s personnel operated in a remote environment during fiscal years 2021 and 2022. Additionally, physical inventory procedures, which are designed detect differences between perpetual and actual information, were waived during fiscal years 2020 and 2021 as a result of the pandemic. Possible Asserted Effect: Failure to maintain accurate property records may prohibit the University from properly safeguarding and maintaining equipment and may result in federal programs not receiving the appropriate share of proceeds from the disposals of equipment purchased with federal funds. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was not reported in the prior year audit. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procedures for updating property records to ensure they accurately reflect equipment information. We also recommend the University properly tag equipment in accordance with its policy. Views of University Officials: The University agrees with the finding. All departments of the University will be reminded that tagging is an integral part of the internal control process for capital assets and training will be made available before June 30, 2023.
Finding 2022 002: Inaccurate Property Management Records Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) U.S. Department of Commerce (USDOC) U.S. Department of Defense (USDOD) U.S. Director of National Intelligence (USDNI) U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (USHUD) U.S. Department of Interior (USDOI) U.S. Department of Justice (USDOJ) U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) National Science Foundation (NSF) U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs (USDVA) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) U.S. Department of Energy (USDOE) U.S. Department of Education (USDE) Smithsonian Institution U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS) Corporation for National and Community Service All Pass-Through Entities Program Name: Research and Development Cluster ALN # and Program Expenditures: Various ($482,298,931) Federal Award Numbers: Various ? See schedule of award numbers Federal Award Year: Various ? See schedule of award numbers Questioned Costs: None Compliance Requirement: Equipment Condition Found: The University did not consistently follow its property management policies and procedures related to equipment purchased with federal funding from the Research and Development (R&D) Cluster program. The University conducts research at multiple locations throughout their campus, where equipment purchased with federal funds is utilized and maintained. The University identifies all equipment in its property management records with individually assigned asset numbers and each individual asset record includes the specific location of the asset, the federal award general ledger account number that funded the purchase of the asset, and other required information. An asset tag with the assigned asset number is affixed to each asset in accordance with University policy. During our physical observation of 60 pieces of equipment purchased with R&D Cluster funds (with a total cost value of $1,542,384), we noted the following: - Nine items (with a total cost value of $200,035) did not have property management tags affixed at the time of our observation. - Eight items (with a total cost value of $103,583) had property management tags with asset numbers that were inconsistent with the equipment listing. Upon further review, we noted the property management records contained a temporary asset tag number that had not been updated for the permanent tag subsequently affixed by department personnel. Further, we noted adequate management review controls had not been established to ensure property management records were accurately updated and equipment was properly tagged. The net book value of equipment related to the R&D Cluster program totaled $217,101,257 at June 30, 2022. Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.313(d)(1), property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property, who holds title, the acquisition date, and cost of the property, percentage of Federal participation in the project costs for the Federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sale price of the property. In addition, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Effective internal controls should include procedures to ensure that accurate property records are maintained and equipment items are properly tagged. Cause: In discussing these conditions with University officials, they stated the University?s procedures for tagging equipment were delayed because the University?s personnel operated in a remote environment during fiscal years 2021 and 2022. Additionally, physical inventory procedures, which are designed detect differences between perpetual and actual information, were waived during fiscal years 2020 and 2021 as a result of the pandemic. Possible Asserted Effect: Failure to maintain accurate property records may prohibit the University from properly safeguarding and maintaining equipment and may result in federal programs not receiving the appropriate share of proceeds from the disposals of equipment purchased with federal funds. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was not reported in the prior year audit. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procedures for updating property records to ensure they accurately reflect equipment information. We also recommend the University properly tag equipment in accordance with its policy. Views of University Officials: The University agrees with the finding. All departments of the University will be reminded that tagging is an integral part of the internal control process for capital assets and training will be made available before June 30, 2023.
Finding 2022 002: Inaccurate Property Management Records Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) U.S. Department of Commerce (USDOC) U.S. Department of Defense (USDOD) U.S. Director of National Intelligence (USDNI) U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (USHUD) U.S. Department of Interior (USDOI) U.S. Department of Justice (USDOJ) U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) National Science Foundation (NSF) U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs (USDVA) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) U.S. Department of Energy (USDOE) U.S. Department of Education (USDE) Smithsonian Institution U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS) Corporation for National and Community Service All Pass-Through Entities Program Name: Research and Development Cluster ALN # and Program Expenditures: Various ($482,298,931) Federal Award Numbers: Various ? See schedule of award numbers Federal Award Year: Various ? See schedule of award numbers Questioned Costs: None Compliance Requirement: Equipment Condition Found: The University did not consistently follow its property management policies and procedures related to equipment purchased with federal funding from the Research and Development (R&D) Cluster program. The University conducts research at multiple locations throughout their campus, where equipment purchased with federal funds is utilized and maintained. The University identifies all equipment in its property management records with individually assigned asset numbers and each individual asset record includes the specific location of the asset, the federal award general ledger account number that funded the purchase of the asset, and other required information. An asset tag with the assigned asset number is affixed to each asset in accordance with University policy. During our physical observation of 60 pieces of equipment purchased with R&D Cluster funds (with a total cost value of $1,542,384), we noted the following: - Nine items (with a total cost value of $200,035) did not have property management tags affixed at the time of our observation. - Eight items (with a total cost value of $103,583) had property management tags with asset numbers that were inconsistent with the equipment listing. Upon further review, we noted the property management records contained a temporary asset tag number that had not been updated for the permanent tag subsequently affixed by department personnel. Further, we noted adequate management review controls had not been established to ensure property management records were accurately updated and equipment was properly tagged. The net book value of equipment related to the R&D Cluster program totaled $217,101,257 at June 30, 2022. Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.313(d)(1), property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property, who holds title, the acquisition date, and cost of the property, percentage of Federal participation in the project costs for the Federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sale price of the property. In addition, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Effective internal controls should include procedures to ensure that accurate property records are maintained and equipment items are properly tagged. Cause: In discussing these conditions with University officials, they stated the University?s procedures for tagging equipment were delayed because the University?s personnel operated in a remote environment during fiscal years 2021 and 2022. Additionally, physical inventory procedures, which are designed detect differences between perpetual and actual information, were waived during fiscal years 2020 and 2021 as a result of the pandemic. Possible Asserted Effect: Failure to maintain accurate property records may prohibit the University from properly safeguarding and maintaining equipment and may result in federal programs not receiving the appropriate share of proceeds from the disposals of equipment purchased with federal funds. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was not reported in the prior year audit. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procedures for updating property records to ensure they accurately reflect equipment information. We also recommend the University properly tag equipment in accordance with its policy. Views of University Officials: The University agrees with the finding. All departments of the University will be reminded that tagging is an integral part of the internal control process for capital assets and training will be made available before June 30, 2023.
Finding 2022 002: Inaccurate Property Management Records Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) U.S. Department of Commerce (USDOC) U.S. Department of Defense (USDOD) U.S. Director of National Intelligence (USDNI) U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (USHUD) U.S. Department of Interior (USDOI) U.S. Department of Justice (USDOJ) U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) National Science Foundation (NSF) U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs (USDVA) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) U.S. Department of Energy (USDOE) U.S. Department of Education (USDE) Smithsonian Institution U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS) Corporation for National and Community Service All Pass-Through Entities Program Name: Research and Development Cluster ALN # and Program Expenditures: Various ($482,298,931) Federal Award Numbers: Various ? See schedule of award numbers Federal Award Year: Various ? See schedule of award numbers Questioned Costs: None Compliance Requirement: Equipment Condition Found: The University did not consistently follow its property management policies and procedures related to equipment purchased with federal funding from the Research and Development (R&D) Cluster program. The University conducts research at multiple locations throughout their campus, where equipment purchased with federal funds is utilized and maintained. The University identifies all equipment in its property management records with individually assigned asset numbers and each individual asset record includes the specific location of the asset, the federal award general ledger account number that funded the purchase of the asset, and other required information. An asset tag with the assigned asset number is affixed to each asset in accordance with University policy. During our physical observation of 60 pieces of equipment purchased with R&D Cluster funds (with a total cost value of $1,542,384), we noted the following: - Nine items (with a total cost value of $200,035) did not have property management tags affixed at the time of our observation. - Eight items (with a total cost value of $103,583) had property management tags with asset numbers that were inconsistent with the equipment listing. Upon further review, we noted the property management records contained a temporary asset tag number that had not been updated for the permanent tag subsequently affixed by department personnel. Further, we noted adequate management review controls had not been established to ensure property management records were accurately updated and equipment was properly tagged. The net book value of equipment related to the R&D Cluster program totaled $217,101,257 at June 30, 2022. Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.313(d)(1), property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property, who holds title, the acquisition date, and cost of the property, percentage of Federal participation in the project costs for the Federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sale price of the property. In addition, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Effective internal controls should include procedures to ensure that accurate property records are maintained and equipment items are properly tagged. Cause: In discussing these conditions with University officials, they stated the University?s procedures for tagging equipment were delayed because the University?s personnel operated in a remote environment during fiscal years 2021 and 2022. Additionally, physical inventory procedures, which are designed detect differences between perpetual and actual information, were waived during fiscal years 2020 and 2021 as a result of the pandemic. Possible Asserted Effect: Failure to maintain accurate property records may prohibit the University from properly safeguarding and maintaining equipment and may result in federal programs not receiving the appropriate share of proceeds from the disposals of equipment purchased with federal funds. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was not reported in the prior year audit. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procedures for updating property records to ensure they accurately reflect equipment information. We also recommend the University properly tag equipment in accordance with its policy. Views of University Officials: The University agrees with the finding. All departments of the University will be reminded that tagging is an integral part of the internal control process for capital assets and training will be made available before June 30, 2023.
Finding 2022 002: Inaccurate Property Management Records Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) U.S. Department of Commerce (USDOC) U.S. Department of Defense (USDOD) U.S. Director of National Intelligence (USDNI) U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (USHUD) U.S. Department of Interior (USDOI) U.S. Department of Justice (USDOJ) U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) National Science Foundation (NSF) U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs (USDVA) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) U.S. Department of Energy (USDOE) U.S. Department of Education (USDE) Smithsonian Institution U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS) Corporation for National and Community Service All Pass-Through Entities Program Name: Research and Development Cluster ALN # and Program Expenditures: Various ($482,298,931) Federal Award Numbers: Various ? See schedule of award numbers Federal Award Year: Various ? See schedule of award numbers Questioned Costs: None Compliance Requirement: Equipment Condition Found: The University did not consistently follow its property management policies and procedures related to equipment purchased with federal funding from the Research and Development (R&D) Cluster program. The University conducts research at multiple locations throughout their campus, where equipment purchased with federal funds is utilized and maintained. The University identifies all equipment in its property management records with individually assigned asset numbers and each individual asset record includes the specific location of the asset, the federal award general ledger account number that funded the purchase of the asset, and other required information. An asset tag with the assigned asset number is affixed to each asset in accordance with University policy. During our physical observation of 60 pieces of equipment purchased with R&D Cluster funds (with a total cost value of $1,542,384), we noted the following: - Nine items (with a total cost value of $200,035) did not have property management tags affixed at the time of our observation. - Eight items (with a total cost value of $103,583) had property management tags with asset numbers that were inconsistent with the equipment listing. Upon further review, we noted the property management records contained a temporary asset tag number that had not been updated for the permanent tag subsequently affixed by department personnel. Further, we noted adequate management review controls had not been established to ensure property management records were accurately updated and equipment was properly tagged. The net book value of equipment related to the R&D Cluster program totaled $217,101,257 at June 30, 2022. Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.313(d)(1), property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property, who holds title, the acquisition date, and cost of the property, percentage of Federal participation in the project costs for the Federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sale price of the property. In addition, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Effective internal controls should include procedures to ensure that accurate property records are maintained and equipment items are properly tagged. Cause: In discussing these conditions with University officials, they stated the University?s procedures for tagging equipment were delayed because the University?s personnel operated in a remote environment during fiscal years 2021 and 2022. Additionally, physical inventory procedures, which are designed detect differences between perpetual and actual information, were waived during fiscal years 2020 and 2021 as a result of the pandemic. Possible Asserted Effect: Failure to maintain accurate property records may prohibit the University from properly safeguarding and maintaining equipment and may result in federal programs not receiving the appropriate share of proceeds from the disposals of equipment purchased with federal funds. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was not reported in the prior year audit. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procedures for updating property records to ensure they accurately reflect equipment information. We also recommend the University properly tag equipment in accordance with its policy. Views of University Officials: The University agrees with the finding. All departments of the University will be reminded that tagging is an integral part of the internal control process for capital assets and training will be made available before June 30, 2023.
Finding 2022 002: Inaccurate Property Management Records Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) U.S. Department of Commerce (USDOC) U.S. Department of Defense (USDOD) U.S. Director of National Intelligence (USDNI) U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (USHUD) U.S. Department of Interior (USDOI) U.S. Department of Justice (USDOJ) U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) National Science Foundation (NSF) U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs (USDVA) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) U.S. Department of Energy (USDOE) U.S. Department of Education (USDE) Smithsonian Institution U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS) Corporation for National and Community Service All Pass-Through Entities Program Name: Research and Development Cluster ALN # and Program Expenditures: Various ($482,298,931) Federal Award Numbers: Various ? See schedule of award numbers Federal Award Year: Various ? See schedule of award numbers Questioned Costs: None Compliance Requirement: Equipment Condition Found: The University did not consistently follow its property management policies and procedures related to equipment purchased with federal funding from the Research and Development (R&D) Cluster program. The University conducts research at multiple locations throughout their campus, where equipment purchased with federal funds is utilized and maintained. The University identifies all equipment in its property management records with individually assigned asset numbers and each individual asset record includes the specific location of the asset, the federal award general ledger account number that funded the purchase of the asset, and other required information. An asset tag with the assigned asset number is affixed to each asset in accordance with University policy. During our physical observation of 60 pieces of equipment purchased with R&D Cluster funds (with a total cost value of $1,542,384), we noted the following: - Nine items (with a total cost value of $200,035) did not have property management tags affixed at the time of our observation. - Eight items (with a total cost value of $103,583) had property management tags with asset numbers that were inconsistent with the equipment listing. Upon further review, we noted the property management records contained a temporary asset tag number that had not been updated for the permanent tag subsequently affixed by department personnel. Further, we noted adequate management review controls had not been established to ensure property management records were accurately updated and equipment was properly tagged. The net book value of equipment related to the R&D Cluster program totaled $217,101,257 at June 30, 2022. Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.313(d)(1), property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property, who holds title, the acquisition date, and cost of the property, percentage of Federal participation in the project costs for the Federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sale price of the property. In addition, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Effective internal controls should include procedures to ensure that accurate property records are maintained and equipment items are properly tagged. Cause: In discussing these conditions with University officials, they stated the University?s procedures for tagging equipment were delayed because the University?s personnel operated in a remote environment during fiscal years 2021 and 2022. Additionally, physical inventory procedures, which are designed detect differences between perpetual and actual information, were waived during fiscal years 2020 and 2021 as a result of the pandemic. Possible Asserted Effect: Failure to maintain accurate property records may prohibit the University from properly safeguarding and maintaining equipment and may result in federal programs not receiving the appropriate share of proceeds from the disposals of equipment purchased with federal funds. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was not reported in the prior year audit. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procedures for updating property records to ensure they accurately reflect equipment information. We also recommend the University properly tag equipment in accordance with its policy. Views of University Officials: The University agrees with the finding. All departments of the University will be reminded that tagging is an integral part of the internal control process for capital assets and training will be made available before June 30, 2023.
Finding 2022 002: Inaccurate Property Management Records Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) U.S. Department of Commerce (USDOC) U.S. Department of Defense (USDOD) U.S. Director of National Intelligence (USDNI) U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (USHUD) U.S. Department of Interior (USDOI) U.S. Department of Justice (USDOJ) U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) National Science Foundation (NSF) U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs (USDVA) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) U.S. Department of Energy (USDOE) U.S. Department of Education (USDE) Smithsonian Institution U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS) Corporation for National and Community Service All Pass-Through Entities Program Name: Research and Development Cluster ALN # and Program Expenditures: Various ($482,298,931) Federal Award Numbers: Various ? See schedule of award numbers Federal Award Year: Various ? See schedule of award numbers Questioned Costs: None Compliance Requirement: Equipment Condition Found: The University did not consistently follow its property management policies and procedures related to equipment purchased with federal funding from the Research and Development (R&D) Cluster program. The University conducts research at multiple locations throughout their campus, where equipment purchased with federal funds is utilized and maintained. The University identifies all equipment in its property management records with individually assigned asset numbers and each individual asset record includes the specific location of the asset, the federal award general ledger account number that funded the purchase of the asset, and other required information. An asset tag with the assigned asset number is affixed to each asset in accordance with University policy. During our physical observation of 60 pieces of equipment purchased with R&D Cluster funds (with a total cost value of $1,542,384), we noted the following: - Nine items (with a total cost value of $200,035) did not have property management tags affixed at the time of our observation. - Eight items (with a total cost value of $103,583) had property management tags with asset numbers that were inconsistent with the equipment listing. Upon further review, we noted the property management records contained a temporary asset tag number that had not been updated for the permanent tag subsequently affixed by department personnel. Further, we noted adequate management review controls had not been established to ensure property management records were accurately updated and equipment was properly tagged. The net book value of equipment related to the R&D Cluster program totaled $217,101,257 at June 30, 2022. Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.313(d)(1), property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property, who holds title, the acquisition date, and cost of the property, percentage of Federal participation in the project costs for the Federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sale price of the property. In addition, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Effective internal controls should include procedures to ensure that accurate property records are maintained and equipment items are properly tagged. Cause: In discussing these conditions with University officials, they stated the University?s procedures for tagging equipment were delayed because the University?s personnel operated in a remote environment during fiscal years 2021 and 2022. Additionally, physical inventory procedures, which are designed detect differences between perpetual and actual information, were waived during fiscal years 2020 and 2021 as a result of the pandemic. Possible Asserted Effect: Failure to maintain accurate property records may prohibit the University from properly safeguarding and maintaining equipment and may result in federal programs not receiving the appropriate share of proceeds from the disposals of equipment purchased with federal funds. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was not reported in the prior year audit. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procedures for updating property records to ensure they accurately reflect equipment information. We also recommend the University properly tag equipment in accordance with its policy. Views of University Officials: The University agrees with the finding. All departments of the University will be reminded that tagging is an integral part of the internal control process for capital assets and training will be made available before June 30, 2023.
Finding 2022 002: Inaccurate Property Management Records Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) U.S. Department of Commerce (USDOC) U.S. Department of Defense (USDOD) U.S. Director of National Intelligence (USDNI) U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (USHUD) U.S. Department of Interior (USDOI) U.S. Department of Justice (USDOJ) U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) National Science Foundation (NSF) U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs (USDVA) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) U.S. Department of Energy (USDOE) U.S. Department of Education (USDE) Smithsonian Institution U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS) Corporation for National and Community Service All Pass-Through Entities Program Name: Research and Development Cluster ALN # and Program Expenditures: Various ($482,298,931) Federal Award Numbers: Various ? See schedule of award numbers Federal Award Year: Various ? See schedule of award numbers Questioned Costs: None Compliance Requirement: Equipment Condition Found: The University did not consistently follow its property management policies and procedures related to equipment purchased with federal funding from the Research and Development (R&D) Cluster program. The University conducts research at multiple locations throughout their campus, where equipment purchased with federal funds is utilized and maintained. The University identifies all equipment in its property management records with individually assigned asset numbers and each individual asset record includes the specific location of the asset, the federal award general ledger account number that funded the purchase of the asset, and other required information. An asset tag with the assigned asset number is affixed to each asset in accordance with University policy. During our physical observation of 60 pieces of equipment purchased with R&D Cluster funds (with a total cost value of $1,542,384), we noted the following: - Nine items (with a total cost value of $200,035) did not have property management tags affixed at the time of our observation. - Eight items (with a total cost value of $103,583) had property management tags with asset numbers that were inconsistent with the equipment listing. Upon further review, we noted the property management records contained a temporary asset tag number that had not been updated for the permanent tag subsequently affixed by department personnel. Further, we noted adequate management review controls had not been established to ensure property management records were accurately updated and equipment was properly tagged. The net book value of equipment related to the R&D Cluster program totaled $217,101,257 at June 30, 2022. Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.313(d)(1), property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property, who holds title, the acquisition date, and cost of the property, percentage of Federal participation in the project costs for the Federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sale price of the property. In addition, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Effective internal controls should include procedures to ensure that accurate property records are maintained and equipment items are properly tagged. Cause: In discussing these conditions with University officials, they stated the University?s procedures for tagging equipment were delayed because the University?s personnel operated in a remote environment during fiscal years 2021 and 2022. Additionally, physical inventory procedures, which are designed detect differences between perpetual and actual information, were waived during fiscal years 2020 and 2021 as a result of the pandemic. Possible Asserted Effect: Failure to maintain accurate property records may prohibit the University from properly safeguarding and maintaining equipment and may result in federal programs not receiving the appropriate share of proceeds from the disposals of equipment purchased with federal funds. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was not reported in the prior year audit. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procedures for updating property records to ensure they accurately reflect equipment information. We also recommend the University properly tag equipment in accordance with its policy. Views of University Officials: The University agrees with the finding. All departments of the University will be reminded that tagging is an integral part of the internal control process for capital assets and training will be made available before June 30, 2023.
Finding 2022 002: Inaccurate Property Management Records Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) U.S. Department of Commerce (USDOC) U.S. Department of Defense (USDOD) U.S. Director of National Intelligence (USDNI) U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (USHUD) U.S. Department of Interior (USDOI) U.S. Department of Justice (USDOJ) U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) National Science Foundation (NSF) U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs (USDVA) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) U.S. Department of Energy (USDOE) U.S. Department of Education (USDE) Smithsonian Institution U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS) Corporation for National and Community Service All Pass-Through Entities Program Name: Research and Development Cluster ALN # and Program Expenditures: Various ($482,298,931) Federal Award Numbers: Various ? See schedule of award numbers Federal Award Year: Various ? See schedule of award numbers Questioned Costs: None Compliance Requirement: Equipment Condition Found: The University did not consistently follow its property management policies and procedures related to equipment purchased with federal funding from the Research and Development (R&D) Cluster program. The University conducts research at multiple locations throughout their campus, where equipment purchased with federal funds is utilized and maintained. The University identifies all equipment in its property management records with individually assigned asset numbers and each individual asset record includes the specific location of the asset, the federal award general ledger account number that funded the purchase of the asset, and other required information. An asset tag with the assigned asset number is affixed to each asset in accordance with University policy. During our physical observation of 60 pieces of equipment purchased with R&D Cluster funds (with a total cost value of $1,542,384), we noted the following: - Nine items (with a total cost value of $200,035) did not have property management tags affixed at the time of our observation. - Eight items (with a total cost value of $103,583) had property management tags with asset numbers that were inconsistent with the equipment listing. Upon further review, we noted the property management records contained a temporary asset tag number that had not been updated for the permanent tag subsequently affixed by department personnel. Further, we noted adequate management review controls had not been established to ensure property management records were accurately updated and equipment was properly tagged. The net book value of equipment related to the R&D Cluster program totaled $217,101,257 at June 30, 2022. Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.313(d)(1), property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property, who holds title, the acquisition date, and cost of the property, percentage of Federal participation in the project costs for the Federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sale price of the property. In addition, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Effective internal controls should include procedures to ensure that accurate property records are maintained and equipment items are properly tagged. Cause: In discussing these conditions with University officials, they stated the University?s procedures for tagging equipment were delayed because the University?s personnel operated in a remote environment during fiscal years 2021 and 2022. Additionally, physical inventory procedures, which are designed detect differences between perpetual and actual information, were waived during fiscal years 2020 and 2021 as a result of the pandemic. Possible Asserted Effect: Failure to maintain accurate property records may prohibit the University from properly safeguarding and maintaining equipment and may result in federal programs not receiving the appropriate share of proceeds from the disposals of equipment purchased with federal funds. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was not reported in the prior year audit. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procedures for updating property records to ensure they accurately reflect equipment information. We also recommend the University properly tag equipment in accordance with its policy. Views of University Officials: The University agrees with the finding. All departments of the University will be reminded that tagging is an integral part of the internal control process for capital assets and training will be made available before June 30, 2023.
FINDING 2022-002 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 21611-047-PN01, 21619-047-PN01, 22611-047-PN01, 22619-047- PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 15 KANKAKEE VALLEY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2020-003. Condition and Context The School Corporation is a member of the Cooperative School Services (Cooperative). The Cooperative operated the special education programs on behalf of the School Corporation and managed the Special Education grant funds. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education and the School Corporation, the School Corporation was responsible for compliance with the grant agreement and the suspension and debarment requirements of the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. The School Corporation did not have adequate internal controls in place to ensure the Cooperative complied with the suspension and debarment requirements. The Special Education Director obtained suspension and debarment certifications for contracted vendors over $25,000 without an oversight or review process. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause Management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the suspension and debarment requirements of the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the suspension and debarment requirements of the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 16 KANKAKEE VALLEY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish internal controls to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-003 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 20611-047-PN01, 20619-047-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. The School Corporation did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for non-public students for private school and homeschooled students were met. The School Corporation did not spend all of the required proportionate share for grant 20611-047-PN01. Additionally, the School Corporation did not spend any of the required proportionate share amount for grant 20619-047-PN01. For grant 20611-047-PN01, the amounts spent for one of the four teachers was not supported by timesheets. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 17 KANKAKEE VALLEY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.400 states in part: ". . . (a) The non-Federal entity is responsible for the efficient and effective administration of the Federal award through the application of sound management practices. (b) The non-Federal entity assumes responsibility for administering Federal funds in a manner consistent with underlying agreements, program objectives, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: . . . (g) Be adequately documented . . ." 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause Management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Pandemic Electronic Benefit Transfer Food Benefits 10.542 COVID-19 - Pandemic Electronic Benefit Transfer Food Benefits (P-EBT) See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table within the text DSS controls over the P-EBT program were insufficient to prevent improper benefit issuances on behalf of school children. Our audit sample of payments for 60 school children noted the DSS issued benefits on behalf of one ineligible child and made overpayments on behalf of another child. During the year ended June 30, 2022, the DSS issued P-EBT program benefits totaling approximately $75 million on behalf of approximately 78,000 school children and approximately $144 million on behalf of approximately 163,000 children in child care. The objective of the P-EBT program is to provide nutrition assistance on EBT cards for school children who would have received free or reduced price school meals under the National School Lunch Program and School Breakfast Program had their schools not been closed or operating with reduced hours due to the COVID-19 public health emergency. The P-EBT program similarly provides benefits for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program-enrolled children in child care. The Families First Coronavirus Response Act, Pub. L. 116-127, Section 1101, requires P-EBT program benefits be issued in accordance with the state's approved plan. For benefits for school children, the DSS and the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education jointly developed a plan for the administration of the P-EBT program for the 2020-2021 school year and a plan amendment for the summer 2021 period. The plan and 2 plan amendments were approved by the USDA in June 2021, August 2021, and September 2021, respectively; and the DSS began issuing P-EBT program benefits in July 2021. Under the state's plan, the DSS would receive from all school districts in the state (1) surveys indicating the extent of school closures in the district due to COVID-19 for each month during the school year, and (2) listings of students eligible for free or reduced price meals during the school year. Pursuant to the plan, the DSS required parents to submit applications for benefits, and established procedures to verify the applications to the listings obtained from the school districts, determine benefit amounts for each eligible child, and issue P-EBT program benefits to households with eligible children. Eligible participants were entitled to receive $129.58 per month of virtual learning and/or $77.75 per month of hybrid (mixed) learning. For the summer period, each eligible child was entitled to the standard summer benefit of $375 despite the school's operating status during the school year. To test compliance with the plan's provisions for school children, we reviewed a randomly-selected sample of P-EBT program payments for 60 school children, totaling $31,009. The DSS made improper payments for 2 of 60 participants reviewed (3 percent). The DSS issued benefits totaling $596 for one ineligible child who was not included in the listing of children eligible for free or reduced priced meals, and issued benefits for another child totaling $414 in excess of amounts the child was entitled to receive. DSS officials indicated processing errors were made without detection for both children. We question the unallowable benefits totaling $1,010 (100 percent federal share) issued on behalf of these children. Without adequate internal controls, the DSS cannot ensure that P-EBT program benefits are issued in accordance with the approved state plan. Rule 2 CFR Section 200.303(a) requires the nonfederal entity to "[e]stablish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award." Recommendation: The DSS through the FSD strengthen internal controls to ensure P-EBT program benefit issuances are in accordance with the state plan, and review and correct the overpayments for the children identified in this finding. Auditee's Response: We agree with the auditor's finding. Our Corrective Action Plan includes our planned actions to address the finding.
DESE FFATA Reporting 84.425C COVID-19 - Governor's Emergency Education Relief (GEER) Fund 84.425R COVID-19 - Emergency Assistance for Non-Public Schools (EANS) See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table within the text The DESE needs to strengthen internal controls related to Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) reporting for the Education Stabilization Fund. As similarly noted in our previous audit, during state fiscal year 2022, the DESE did not comply with FFATA reporting requirements for any of the subawards reviewed for the GEER Fund or the EANS program. In addition, the DESE has not made corrections and resubmitted state fiscal year 2021 FFATA reports for the GEER Fund grants. The FFATA requires comprehensive reporting for certain federal awards to promote transparency and accountability over the use of the federal funds. Rule 2 CFR Part 170, Appendix A, requires the DESE to report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more to the FFATA Subaward Reporting System (FSRS) no later than the end of the month following the month in which the subaward was made. Information entered into the FSRS is publicly available at USASpending.gov. The GEER Fund grants were initially awarded to the Governor's office. The Office of Administration (OA), on behalf of the Governor's office, entered into an interagency agreement with the DESE and the Department of Higher Education and Workforce Development (DHEWD), designating the DESE as the fiscal agent for the GEER Fund for the State of Missouri. The DESE draws down and disburses the funds to the DESE subrecipients (Local Education Agencies [LEAs]) and to the DHEWD. The DHEWD disburses funds to the DHEWD subrecipients (Institutions of Higher Education [IHEs]). The GEER interagency agreement states the DESE shall manage all reporting requirements by collecting information and data including data from the DHEWD and the OA. For the EANS program, the DESE received the grant on behalf of the Governor's office, was designated the fiscal agent, and disbursed funds to the LEAs. During state fiscal year 2022, the DESE and the DHEWD disbursed approximately $21.6 million of first-tier subawards to 348 subrecipients of the GEER Fund and the DESE disbursed approximately $3.3 million in first-tier subawards to 82 subrecipients of the EANS program. First-tier subaward payments accounted for approximately 99 percent of the GEER Fund expenditures and 7 percent of the EANS program expenditures. Internal controls: DESE policies and procedures over the FFATA reporting process require supervisory review of the information uploaded to the FSRS, but do not require the supervisors maintain documentation of reviews performed. DESE personnel prepare an excel spreadsheet of the awards allocated to subrecipients, transfer the spreadsheet data to the federal FSRS template, and upload the data to the FSRS. Various subaward data is uploaded, including the entity name, award amount, and the date issued. DESE personnel could not provide documentation supporting the supervisory reviews performed, but indicated they intend to implement documented reviews during state fiscal year 2023. Without documented supervisory review over FFATA reporting, the DESE cannot demonstrate adherence to the established policies and procedures, and has less assurance the information included in the FFATA reporting for the Education Stabilization Fund is complete and accurate. Rule 2 CFR Section 200.303(a) requires the non-federal entity to "[e]stablish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award." FFATA reporting: The DESE did not comply with FFATA reporting requirements for the GEER Fund and the EANS program. To test compliance with FFATA reporting requirements for the GEER Fund and the EANS program, we reviewed the FSRS reports submitted by DESE personnel during state fiscal year 2022. For the GEER Fund, the DESE did not report any of the 81 LEA subawards requiring FFATA reporting, totaling approximately $9.7 million, or the 22 IHE subawards, totaling approximately $12 million, in the FSRS. Instead, the DESE incorrectly reported as subawards, the allocations by the Governor's office to the DESE and the DHEWD. For the EANS program, the DESE did not report any of the 9 subawards requiring FFATA reporting, totaling approximately $3.7 million, in the FSRS. Instead, the DESE incorrectly reported as a subaward, the grant award received by the DESE on behalf of the Governor's office. All of these errors occurred prior to auditors identifying and communicating similar errors during the state fiscal year 2021 audit. Additionally, the DESE made some corrections to FFATA reports; however, as of April 2023, the DESE had not resubmitted fully corrected state fiscal year 2021 FFATA reports for the GEER Fund grants. DESE personnel indicated the FFATA reporting errors occurred due to a misunderstanding of FFATA reporting requirements as well as the unusual nature of the GEER Fund and EANS program allocations. DESE personnel also indicated they have been working with the ED since April 2022 in an effort to correct the erroneous FFATA reports; however, due to technical difficulties with the FSRS, they have been unable to timely and fully correct the reports. In addition to noncompliance with federal requirements, not reporting subawards to the FSRS accurately and timely increases the risk that those using the reports could rely on inaccurate information. Recommendation: The DESE strengthen internal controls related to FFATA reporting by having supervisors maintain documentation of reviews performed of the information reported in the FSRS for the Education Stabilization Fund. In addition, the DESE should complete FFATA reporting for the Education Stabilization Fund programs in accordance with the applicable requirements and continue to work toward resubmitting corrected reports for state fiscal years 2021 and 2022. Auditee's Response: We agree with the auditor's finding. Our Corrective Action Plan includes our planned actions to address the finding.
DESE FFATA Reporting 84.425C COVID-19 - Governor's Emergency Education Relief (GEER) Fund 84.425R COVID-19 - Emergency Assistance for Non-Public Schools (EANS) See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table within the text The DESE needs to strengthen internal controls related to Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) reporting for the Education Stabilization Fund. As similarly noted in our previous audit, during state fiscal year 2022, the DESE did not comply with FFATA reporting requirements for any of the subawards reviewed for the GEER Fund or the EANS program. In addition, the DESE has not made corrections and resubmitted state fiscal year 2021 FFATA reports for the GEER Fund grants. The FFATA requires comprehensive reporting for certain federal awards to promote transparency and accountability over the use of the federal funds. Rule 2 CFR Part 170, Appendix A, requires the DESE to report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more to the FFATA Subaward Reporting System (FSRS) no later than the end of the month following the month in which the subaward was made. Information entered into the FSRS is publicly available at USASpending.gov. The GEER Fund grants were initially awarded to the Governor's office. The Office of Administration (OA), on behalf of the Governor's office, entered into an interagency agreement with the DESE and the Department of Higher Education and Workforce Development (DHEWD), designating the DESE as the fiscal agent for the GEER Fund for the State of Missouri. The DESE draws down and disburses the funds to the DESE subrecipients (Local Education Agencies [LEAs]) and to the DHEWD. The DHEWD disburses funds to the DHEWD subrecipients (Institutions of Higher Education [IHEs]). The GEER interagency agreement states the DESE shall manage all reporting requirements by collecting information and data including data from the DHEWD and the OA. For the EANS program, the DESE received the grant on behalf of the Governor's office, was designated the fiscal agent, and disbursed funds to the LEAs. During state fiscal year 2022, the DESE and the DHEWD disbursed approximately $21.6 million of first-tier subawards to 348 subrecipients of the GEER Fund and the DESE disbursed approximately $3.3 million in first-tier subawards to 82 subrecipients of the EANS program. First-tier subaward payments accounted for approximately 99 percent of the GEER Fund expenditures and 7 percent of the EANS program expenditures. Internal controls: DESE policies and procedures over the FFATA reporting process require supervisory review of the information uploaded to the FSRS, but do not require the supervisors maintain documentation of reviews performed. DESE personnel prepare an excel spreadsheet of the awards allocated to subrecipients, transfer the spreadsheet data to the federal FSRS template, and upload the data to the FSRS. Various subaward data is uploaded, including the entity name, award amount, and the date issued. DESE personnel could not provide documentation supporting the supervisory reviews performed, but indicated they intend to implement documented reviews during state fiscal year 2023. Without documented supervisory review over FFATA reporting, the DESE cannot demonstrate adherence to the established policies and procedures, and has less assurance the information included in the FFATA reporting for the Education Stabilization Fund is complete and accurate. Rule 2 CFR Section 200.303(a) requires the non-federal entity to "[e]stablish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award." FFATA reporting: The DESE did not comply with FFATA reporting requirements for the GEER Fund and the EANS program. To test compliance with FFATA reporting requirements for the GEER Fund and the EANS program, we reviewed the FSRS reports submitted by DESE personnel during state fiscal year 2022. For the GEER Fund, the DESE did not report any of the 81 LEA subawards requiring FFATA reporting, totaling approximately $9.7 million, or the 22 IHE subawards, totaling approximately $12 million, in the FSRS. Instead, the DESE incorrectly reported as subawards, the allocations by the Governor's office to the DESE and the DHEWD. For the EANS program, the DESE did not report any of the 9 subawards requiring FFATA reporting, totaling approximately $3.7 million, in the FSRS. Instead, the DESE incorrectly reported as a subaward, the grant award received by the DESE on behalf of the Governor's office. All of these errors occurred prior to auditors identifying and communicating similar errors during the state fiscal year 2021 audit. Additionally, the DESE made some corrections to FFATA reports; however, as of April 2023, the DESE had not resubmitted fully corrected state fiscal year 2021 FFATA reports for the GEER Fund grants. DESE personnel indicated the FFATA reporting errors occurred due to a misunderstanding of FFATA reporting requirements as well as the unusual nature of the GEER Fund and EANS program allocations. DESE personnel also indicated they have been working with the ED since April 2022 in an effort to correct the erroneous FFATA reports; however, due to technical difficulties with the FSRS, they have been unable to timely and fully correct the reports. In addition to noncompliance with federal requirements, not reporting subawards to the FSRS accurately and timely increases the risk that those using the reports could rely on inaccurate information. Recommendation: The DESE strengthen internal controls related to FFATA reporting by having supervisors maintain documentation of reviews performed of the information reported in the FSRS for the Education Stabilization Fund. In addition, the DESE should complete FFATA reporting for the Education Stabilization Fund programs in accordance with the applicable requirements and continue to work toward resubmitting corrected reports for state fiscal years 2021 and 2022. Auditee's Response: We agree with the auditor's finding. Our Corrective Action Plan includes our planned actions to address the finding.
DSS FFATA Reporting 93.667 Social Services Block Grant (SSBG) See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table within the text As similarly noted in our previous audit, the DFAS needs to strengthen internal controls related to Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) reporting. During state fiscal year 2022, the DFAS did not comply with FFATA reporting requirements for any of the subawards reviewed for the SSBG program. During state fiscal year 2022, the DSS disbursed approximately $7 million in first-tier subawards to 20 subrecipients of the SSBG program. First-tier subaward payments accounted for approximately 14 percent of the program's expenditures. The FFATA requires comprehensive reporting for certain federal awards to promote transparency and accountability over the use of the federal funds. Rule 2 CFR Part 170, Appendix A, requires the DFAS to report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more to the FFATA Subaward Reporting System (FSRS) no later than the end of the month following the month in which the subaward was made. Information entered into the FSRS is publicly available at USASpending.gov Internal controls: DFAS policies and procedures over the FFATA reporting process require supervisory review of the information uploaded to the FSRS, but do not require the supervisors maintain documentation of reviews performed. DFAS personnel prepare a monthly Excel spreadsheet of data from various sources including contracts and federal funding disclosure information sheets. DFAS personnel transfer the spreadsheet data to the federal FSRS template, and upload the data to the FSRS. Various subaward data is uploaded, including the entity name, award amount, and the date issued. DFAS personnel could not provide documentation supporting the supervisory reviews performed, but indicated they intend to implement documented reviews during the state fiscal year 2023. Without documented supervisory reviews over FFATA reporting, the DFAS cannot demonstrate adherence to the established policies and procedures, and there is less assurance the information included in the FFATA reporting is complete and accurate. Rule 2 CFR Section 200.303(a) requires the non-federal entity to "[e]stablish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award." FFATA reporting: The DFAS did not comply with FFATA reporting requirements for the SSBG program. To test compliance with FFATA reporting requirements, we reviewed a sample of subawards for 2 of the 20 SSBG subrecipients, totaling $1,952,465, awarded in state fiscal year 2022. Neither of the subawards were uploaded to the FSRS timely. The DSS entered into grant agreements with the subrecipients during July 2020 for the 2-year period of July 1, 2020, through June 30, 2022. DFAS personnel indicated they were required to report these subawards no earlier than November 2020 and November 2021, when they received the corresponding grants. However, DFAS personnel did not upload the subawards to the FSRS until August 2021 and February 2022, 9 months and 3 months later, respectively. DFAS personnel indicated the FFATA reporting delays occurred because of staff turnover, federal government delays in uploading grant information into the FSRS, and FSRS limitations associated with changes in personnel who have system access. They indicated the DSS cannot prepare FFATA reports until the federal awarding agency first enters the federal award information into the FSRS; and since the DSS does not receive notification of this event, the DSS must continually check the system for updates. In addition to noncompliance with federal requirements, not reporting subawards to the FSRS timely increases the risk that those using the reports could rely on inaccurate information. Recommendation: The DSS through the DFAS strengthen internal controls related to FFATA reporting by having supervisors maintain documentation of reviews performed of the information reported to the FSRS. In addition, the DFAS should timely complete FFATA reporting in accordance with the applicable requirements. Auditee's Response: We partially agree with the auditor?s finding. Our Corrective Action Plan includes an explanation and specific reasons for our disagreement and any planned actions to address the finding. Auditor's Comment: The DSS Corrective Action Plan (CAP) states the DSS does not agree that documentation of supervisory reviews directly correlates to strong internal controls. The CAP further states the DSS adheres to formalized procedures for FFATA reporting, which includes managerial oversight and contends documented reviews may be preferred but are not required by regulation. However, without requiring documentation of supervisory reviews performed, the DSS cannot demonstrate adherence to the established policies and procedures. Additionally, the noncompliance identified in this audit and the previous audit is an indicator that DSS internal controls may not be operating as intended. Because effective internal controls include documentation demonstrating the controls are operating in accordance with the established internal control system, this finding is valid.
Program: COVID-19 ? Emergency Rental Assistance Program, (ERAP) Federal Financial Assistance Listing No.: 21.023 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Pass-through: N/A Award Year: 2021-2022 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Grant Award Number: All Type of Finding: Instance of Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal award. The Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) requires direct recipients of certain Federal awards to report subaward information by the end of the month following the month in which the prime awardee obligates a subaward equal to or greater than $30,000. Condition Found: As a result of our audit procedures, we noted that one first tier sub-awardee tested was not reported in the FFATA Subaward Reporting System (FSRS), totaling $1,312,036 in exceptions noted to sub-awardees. Cause: The County did not have internal controls to ensure sub-award information was submitted in accordance with FFATA. Effect: The lack of adequate policies governing report preparation and submission resulted in FFATA special reports not being filed as required by the program. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: For the FFATA reports, there was one applicable subaward in the amount of $1,312,036. Therefore, that one sub-award was tested. Exception was noted, because the subaward was not submitted to FFATA. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): No. Recommendation: We recommend that the County implement policies and procedures to ensure compliance with the program?s special FFATA reporting requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees. See separate corrective action plan.