Program: WIA/WIOA Cluster Assistance Listing No.: 17.258, 17.259, 17.278 Federal Agency: US Department of Labor Passed-through: State of California Employment Development Department (EDD) Award Year and Number: AA011039, AA111039, AA211039, AA311039, 2021/2022 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance, Instances of Noncompliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Condition: We identified one (1) instance in which a required financial report was not submitted, and one (1) instance in which amounts were incomplete/inaccurately reported. Cause: The County did not have procedures in place over these reports to ensure that all required financial reports were submitted and that financial reports were complete and accurate prior to submission. Effect: By not having procedures in place to ensure that 1) all required reports are submitted and 2) reports are complete and accurately prepared, this increases the County?s risk of noncompliance with the program. Questioned Costs: We identified no questioned costs in our tests of compliance with this requirement. Context/Sampling: The condition noted above was found during our testing procedures over reporting. A sample of 14 out of 65 reports were selected. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): No. Recommendation: We recommend that the County review its policies and procedures with regards to the preparation and submission of reports. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. See separate corrective action plan.
Program: WIA/WIOA Cluster Assistance Listing No.: 17.258, 17.259, 17.278 Federal Agency: US Department of Labor Passed-through: State of California Employment Development Department (EDD) Award Year and Number: AA011039, AA111039, AA211039, AA311039, 2021/2022 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance, Instances of Noncompliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Condition: We identified one (1) instance in which a required financial report was not submitted, and one (1) instance in which amounts were incomplete/inaccurately reported. Cause: The County did not have procedures in place over these reports to ensure that all required financial reports were submitted and that financial reports were complete and accurate prior to submission. Effect: By not having procedures in place to ensure that 1) all required reports are submitted and 2) reports are complete and accurately prepared, this increases the County?s risk of noncompliance with the program. Questioned Costs: We identified no questioned costs in our tests of compliance with this requirement. Context/Sampling: The condition noted above was found during our testing procedures over reporting. A sample of 14 out of 65 reports were selected. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): No. Recommendation: We recommend that the County review its policies and procedures with regards to the preparation and submission of reports. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. See separate corrective action plan.
Program: WIA/WIOA Cluster Assistance Listing No.: 17.258, 17.259, 17.278 Federal Agency: US Department of Labor Passed-through: State of California Employment Development Department (EDD) Award Year and Number: AA011039, AA111039, AA211039, AA311039, 2021/2022 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance, Instances of Noncompliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Condition: We identified one (1) instance in which a required financial report was not submitted, and one (1) instance in which amounts were incomplete/inaccurately reported. Cause: The County did not have procedures in place over these reports to ensure that all required financial reports were submitted and that financial reports were complete and accurate prior to submission. Effect: By not having procedures in place to ensure that 1) all required reports are submitted and 2) reports are complete and accurately prepared, this increases the County?s risk of noncompliance with the program. Questioned Costs: We identified no questioned costs in our tests of compliance with this requirement. Context/Sampling: The condition noted above was found during our testing procedures over reporting. A sample of 14 out of 65 reports were selected. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): No. Recommendation: We recommend that the County review its policies and procedures with regards to the preparation and submission of reports. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. See separate corrective action plan.
Program: WIA/WIOA Cluster Assistance Listing No.: 17.258, 17.259, 17.278 Federal Agency: US Department of Labor Passed-through: State of California Employment Development Department (EDD) Award Year and Number: AA011039, AA111039, AA211039, AA311039, 2021/2022 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance, Instances of Noncompliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Condition: We identified one (1) instance in which a required financial report was not submitted, and one (1) instance in which amounts were incomplete/inaccurately reported. Cause: The County did not have procedures in place over these reports to ensure that all required financial reports were submitted and that financial reports were complete and accurate prior to submission. Effect: By not having procedures in place to ensure that 1) all required reports are submitted and 2) reports are complete and accurately prepared, this increases the County?s risk of noncompliance with the program. Questioned Costs: We identified no questioned costs in our tests of compliance with this requirement. Context/Sampling: The condition noted above was found during our testing procedures over reporting. A sample of 14 out of 65 reports were selected. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): No. Recommendation: We recommend that the County review its policies and procedures with regards to the preparation and submission of reports. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. See separate corrective action plan.
Program: WIA/WIOA Cluster Assistance Listing No.: 17.258, 17.259, 17.278 Federal Agency: US Department of Labor Passed-through: State of California Employment Development Department (EDD) Award Year and Number: AA011039, AA111039, AA211039, AA311039, 2021/2022 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance, Instances of Noncompliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Condition: We identified one (1) instance in which a required financial report was not submitted, and one (1) instance in which amounts were incomplete/inaccurately reported. Cause: The County did not have procedures in place over these reports to ensure that all required financial reports were submitted and that financial reports were complete and accurate prior to submission. Effect: By not having procedures in place to ensure that 1) all required reports are submitted and 2) reports are complete and accurately prepared, this increases the County?s risk of noncompliance with the program. Questioned Costs: We identified no questioned costs in our tests of compliance with this requirement. Context/Sampling: The condition noted above was found during our testing procedures over reporting. A sample of 14 out of 65 reports were selected. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): No. Recommendation: We recommend that the County review its policies and procedures with regards to the preparation and submission of reports. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. See separate corrective action plan.
Program: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases Assistance Listing No.: 93.323 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Passed-through: California Department of Public Health Award Number and Year: 0187.5280 ELC CARES, COVID-19ELC48, COVID-19ELC106, 187.3408, 2021/2022 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) requires that the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: Out of 4 reports sampled, we noted four (4) instances where the review and approval of the submitted reports was not documented. Cause: The County?s internal control environment was impacted by a shortage of staff necessary to fully conduct the program. Effect: The County?s reports on the awards were not reviewed for accuracy. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context/Sampling: We selected four (4) reports out of eight (8) submitted. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the County establish documented policies and procedures over reporting. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. See separate corrective action plan.
Program: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases Assistance Listing No.: 93.323 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Passed-through: California Department of Public Health Award Number and Year: 0187.5280 ELC CARES, COVID-19ELC48, COVID-19ELC106, 187.3408, 2021/2022 Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance, Instances of Noncompliance Criteria: Per 2 CFR part 200, subpart D, section 200.303, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award is compliance with federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Prior to entering into subawards and contracts with award funds, recipients must verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded pursuant to 31 CFR section 19.300 Condition: Out of 7 reports procurements sampled, we noted 4 instances where there was no evidence that management performed a verification of tested covered transactions by checking the EPLS and management did not obtain a certification or added a clause or condition to the covered transaction. Cause: While aware of the requirements, the County did not have internal controls in place to ensure compliance with the procurement and suspension and debarment requirements. Effect: Noncompliance requirements for entering into contracts with vendors could result in disbursement of Federal funds to suspended or debarred parties. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of 7 out of 32 contracts were selected. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the County implement policies and procedures to ensure procurement methods are properly documented, and to verify SAM registration status of potential vendors, collect certification from potential vendors, or include a clause or condition to the contract to verify that entities to which the County is awarding Federal funds is not suspended or debarred. We also recommend that management review its current vendors to ensure they are not suspended or debarred and maintain documentation of the verification procedure performed. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. See separate corrective action plan.
Program: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases Assistance Listing No.: 93.323 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Passed-through: California Department of Public Health Award Number and Year: 0187.5280 ELC CARES, COVID-19ELC48, COVID-19ELC106, 187.3408, 2021/2022 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) requires that the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: Out of 4 reports sampled, we noted four (4) instances where the review and approval of the submitted reports was not documented. Cause: The County?s internal control environment was impacted by a shortage of staff necessary to fully conduct the program. Effect: The County?s reports on the awards were not reviewed for accuracy. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context/Sampling: We selected four (4) reports out of eight (8) submitted. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the County establish documented policies and procedures over reporting. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. See separate corrective action plan.
Program: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases Assistance Listing No.: 93.323 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Passed-through: California Department of Public Health Award Number and Year: 0187.5280 ELC CARES, COVID-19ELC48, COVID-19ELC106, 187.3408, 2021/2022 Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance, Instances of Noncompliance Criteria: Per 2 CFR part 200, subpart D, section 200.303, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award is compliance with federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Prior to entering into subawards and contracts with award funds, recipients must verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded pursuant to 31 CFR section 19.300 Condition: Out of 7 reports procurements sampled, we noted 4 instances where there was no evidence that management performed a verification of tested covered transactions by checking the EPLS and management did not obtain a certification or added a clause or condition to the covered transaction. Cause: While aware of the requirements, the County did not have internal controls in place to ensure compliance with the procurement and suspension and debarment requirements. Effect: Noncompliance requirements for entering into contracts with vendors could result in disbursement of Federal funds to suspended or debarred parties. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of 7 out of 32 contracts were selected. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the County implement policies and procedures to ensure procurement methods are properly documented, and to verify SAM registration status of potential vendors, collect certification from potential vendors, or include a clause or condition to the contract to verify that entities to which the County is awarding Federal funds is not suspended or debarred. We also recommend that management review its current vendors to ensure they are not suspended or debarred and maintain documentation of the verification procedure performed. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. See separate corrective action plan.
Program: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases Assistance Listing No.: 93.323 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Passed-through: California Department of Public Health Award Number and Year: 0187.5280 ELC CARES, COVID-19ELC48, COVID-19ELC106, 187.3408, 2021/2022 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) requires that the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: Out of 4 reports sampled, we noted four (4) instances where the review and approval of the submitted reports was not documented. Cause: The County?s internal control environment was impacted by a shortage of staff necessary to fully conduct the program. Effect: The County?s reports on the awards were not reviewed for accuracy. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context/Sampling: We selected four (4) reports out of eight (8) submitted. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the County establish documented policies and procedures over reporting. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. See separate corrective action plan.
Program: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases Assistance Listing No.: 93.323 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Passed-through: California Department of Public Health Award Number and Year: 0187.5280 ELC CARES, COVID-19ELC48, COVID-19ELC106, 187.3408, 2021/2022 Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance, Instances of Noncompliance Criteria: Per 2 CFR part 200, subpart D, section 200.303, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award is compliance with federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Prior to entering into subawards and contracts with award funds, recipients must verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded pursuant to 31 CFR section 19.300 Condition: Out of 7 reports procurements sampled, we noted 4 instances where there was no evidence that management performed a verification of tested covered transactions by checking the EPLS and management did not obtain a certification or added a clause or condition to the covered transaction. Cause: While aware of the requirements, the County did not have internal controls in place to ensure compliance with the procurement and suspension and debarment requirements. Effect: Noncompliance requirements for entering into contracts with vendors could result in disbursement of Federal funds to suspended or debarred parties. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of 7 out of 32 contracts were selected. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the County implement policies and procedures to ensure procurement methods are properly documented, and to verify SAM registration status of potential vendors, collect certification from potential vendors, or include a clause or condition to the contract to verify that entities to which the County is awarding Federal funds is not suspended or debarred. We also recommend that management review its current vendors to ensure they are not suspended or debarred and maintain documentation of the verification procedure performed. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. See separate corrective action plan.
Program: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases Assistance Listing No.: 93.323 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Passed-through: California Department of Public Health Award Number and Year: 0187.5280 ELC CARES, COVID-19ELC48, COVID-19ELC106, 187.3408, 2021/2022 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) requires that the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: Out of 4 reports sampled, we noted four (4) instances where the review and approval of the submitted reports was not documented. Cause: The County?s internal control environment was impacted by a shortage of staff necessary to fully conduct the program. Effect: The County?s reports on the awards were not reviewed for accuracy. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context/Sampling: We selected four (4) reports out of eight (8) submitted. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the County establish documented policies and procedures over reporting. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. See separate corrective action plan.
Program: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases Assistance Listing No.: 93.323 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Passed-through: California Department of Public Health Award Number and Year: 0187.5280 ELC CARES, COVID-19ELC48, COVID-19ELC106, 187.3408, 2021/2022 Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance, Instances of Noncompliance Criteria: Per 2 CFR part 200, subpart D, section 200.303, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award is compliance with federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Prior to entering into subawards and contracts with award funds, recipients must verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded pursuant to 31 CFR section 19.300 Condition: Out of 7 reports procurements sampled, we noted 4 instances where there was no evidence that management performed a verification of tested covered transactions by checking the EPLS and management did not obtain a certification or added a clause or condition to the covered transaction. Cause: While aware of the requirements, the County did not have internal controls in place to ensure compliance with the procurement and suspension and debarment requirements. Effect: Noncompliance requirements for entering into contracts with vendors could result in disbursement of Federal funds to suspended or debarred parties. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of 7 out of 32 contracts were selected. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the County implement policies and procedures to ensure procurement methods are properly documented, and to verify SAM registration status of potential vendors, collect certification from potential vendors, or include a clause or condition to the contract to verify that entities to which the County is awarding Federal funds is not suspended or debarred. We also recommend that management review its current vendors to ensure they are not suspended or debarred and maintain documentation of the verification procedure performed. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. See separate corrective action plan.
Program: Emergency Rental Assistance Program Assistance Listing No.: 21.023 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Passed-through: n/a ? direct award Award Number and Year: Not Applicable, 2021/2022 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance, Instances of Noncompliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) requires that the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: We noted that reports were submitted for the program did not go through a review process. Furthermore, we identified two instances in which quarterly report amounts were not accurately reported. We identified two instances in which amounts reported were inaccurate. In both instances, we found that the cumulative expenditures reported did not agreed to the underlying accounting records. In one instance, we found that the County incorrectly reported cumulative obligations and cumulative expenditures as zero. Cause: The County did not establish a review and approval process for the reports submitted for the program. Effect: The County?s reports did not go through a review process. Amounts were not accurately reported. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context/Sampling: These instances were identified through our procedures over compliance with the Uniform Guidance for reporting. A sample of 6 (2 quarterly, 4 monthly) reports out of a population of 16 (2 quarterly and 12 monthly) were selected for testing. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the County strengthen its internal controls to ensure that reports are subject to review prior to submission and maintain evidence of a review and approval. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. See separate corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, Special Tests & Provisions ? Non-Profit School Food Service Accounts Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.533, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): SY 2020/2021, SY 2021/2022 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Allowable Cost/Cost Principles, Special Tests & Provisions ? Non-Profit School Food Service Accounts Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . . " 2 CFR 200.430(i) states in part: "Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; FINDING 2022-002 (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities (for IHE, this per the IHE's definition of IBS); . . . (vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. . . ." 34 CFR 76.730 states: "A State and a subgrantee shall keep records that fully show: (a) The amount of funds under the grant or subgrant; (b) How the State or subgrantee uses the funds; (c) The total cost of the project; (d) The share of that cost provided from other sources; and (e) Other records to facilitate an effective audit." 34 CFR 76.731 states: "A State and a subgrantee shall keep records to show its compliance with program requirements." 7 CFR 220.7(e) states in part: ?. . . the School Food Authority shall, with respect to participating schools under its jurisdiction: (1) . . . . (ii) . . .use all revenues received by such food service only for the operation or improvement of that food service. . . ? 7 CFR 210.14(a) states: ?Nonprofit school food service. School food authorities shall maintain a nonprofit school food service. Revenues received by the nonprofit school food service are to be used only for the operation or improvement of such food service, except that, such revenues shall not be used to purchase land or buildings, unless otherwise approved by FNS, or to construct buildings. Expenditures of nonprofit school food service revenues shall be in accordance with the financial management system established by the State agency under ?210.19(a) of this part. . . . ? Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles and Special Tests & Provisions ? Non-Profit School Food Service Accounts compliance requirements. Cause: Management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles and Special Tests & Provisions ? Non-Profit School Food Service Accounts compliance requirements. Context: The School Corporation did not have effective controls in place to ensure that only applicable employees were paid from program funds. Six of the 24 employees? time charged to the program, did not have adequate documentation to support their wage allocations. The School Corporation paid a portion of the wages for three Elementary School Teachers, two Elementary Instructional Assistants, and one Library Aide from the School Lunch Fund based on fixed percentages. There was no supporting documentation to indicate how the percentages were determined. Wages and benefits charged to the program for the above noted employees totaled $19,073. This amount was considered questions costs. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system by the School Corporation enabled noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles and Special Tests & Provisions - School Food Service Accounts compliance requirements. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles and Special Tests & Provisions ? Non-Profit School Food Service Accounts compliance requirements could result in the loss of federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: $19,073. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls related to the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles and Special Tests & Provisions ? Non-Profit School Food Service Accounts compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
2022-001: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control - Reporting Federal Program: COVID-19: Provider Relief Fund and American Rescue Plan (ARP) Rural Distribution Program Assistance Listing Number: 93.498 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award Number: N/A Award Year: 2022 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Questioned Costs: Not determinable Repeat Finding 2021-001 Criteria: Non-federal entities in receipt of federal funds must comply with the requirements of 2 CFR 200.303(a), which require an entity to establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award to ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Recipients of Provider Relief Funds (PRF) payments must also comply with the reporting requirements described in the PRF terms and conditions and specified in directions issued by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Condition and Context: The Organization did not complete the PRF reporting in accordance with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services guidance. The Organization inadvertently excluded certain value-based incentive payments in its reporting of total revenue/net charges from patient care for all quarters presented. The adjustments needed within the PRF report to correct the errors decreased year over year lost revenues from $44,218,904 to $43,347,174 on total distributions of PRF funding of $19,837,251. Effect: The amounts reported to Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) were not in accordance with established U.S. Department of Health and Human Services reporting guidance. Cause: An oversight by management led to exclusion of certain value-based incentive payments in all quarters presented. Recommendation: We recommend that management implement procedures to ensure that the most recent guidance is reviewed and understood and that information used in preparation of the reports is reviewed, with errors addressed, prior to reporting. View of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the finding and anticipates updating this information with its Period 4 reporting.
2022-001: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control - Reporting Federal Program: COVID-19: Provider Relief Fund and American Rescue Plan (ARP) Rural Distribution Program Assistance Listing Number: 93.498 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award Number: N/A Award Year: 2022 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Questioned Costs: Not determinable Repeat Finding 2021-001 Criteria: Non-federal entities in receipt of federal funds must comply with the requirements of 2 CFR 200.303(a), which require an entity to establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award to ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Recipients of Provider Relief Funds (PRF) payments must also comply with the reporting requirements described in the PRF terms and conditions and specified in directions issued by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Condition and Context: The Organization did not complete the PRF reporting in accordance with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services guidance. The Organization inadvertently excluded certain value-based incentive payments in its reporting of total revenue/net charges from patient care for all quarters presented. The adjustments needed within the PRF report to correct the errors decreased year over year lost revenues from $44,218,904 to $43,347,174 on total distributions of PRF funding of $19,837,251. Effect: The amounts reported to Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) were not in accordance with established U.S. Department of Health and Human Services reporting guidance. Cause: An oversight by management led to exclusion of certain value-based incentive payments in all quarters presented. Recommendation: We recommend that management implement procedures to ensure that the most recent guidance is reviewed and understood and that information used in preparation of the reports is reviewed, with errors addressed, prior to reporting. View of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the finding and anticipates updating this information with its Period 4 reporting.
FINDING 2022-003 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): SY 2020/2021, SY 2021/2022 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: ?The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.? 2 CFR 200.320(b) (Uniform Guidance) states: "Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources." 2 CFR 200.320 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases ? (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states in part: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusion; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person.? Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Cause: Management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Context: Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 for when informal procedures can be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes for three of the five vendors tested that were less than the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000 but exceeded the $10,000 micro-purchase threshold. The micro-purchase threshold may be increased, but the School Corporation did not provide documentation that the threshold had been increased. Documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, was not available for audit. Suspension and Debarment Non-federal entities and contractors are subject to non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or are ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. This is done by checking SAM Exclusions, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. During fiscal years 2020-2021 and 2021-2022, the School Corporation entered into a covered transaction with Stanz Food Service, Inc.. Procedures were not performed to ensure that the vendor was not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from or eligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The lack of controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls related to ensure that 3 quotes are obtained as required for small purchase method procurements and to ensure the vendors are not debarred or suspended. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): SY 2020/2021, SY 2021/2022 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." Condition: An effective internal control system, which would include segregation of duties, was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Cause: Management had not developed or implemented a system of internal control that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Context: The School Corporation had not designed, nor implemented a system of internal control to ensure that the monthly claim for reimbursement were complete and accurately submitted. The monthly claims for reimbursement were prepared by the Food Service Director without an oversight or review process in place to prevent, or detect and correct, errors. The lack of documented controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Effect: The failure to design and implement an effective internal control system could have enabled noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation implement a documented, formal review of the claims before they are submitted for reimbursement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, Special Tests & Provisions ? Non-Profit School Food Service Accounts Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.533, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): SY 2020/2021, SY 2021/2022 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Allowable Cost/Cost Principles, Special Tests & Provisions ? Non-Profit School Food Service Accounts Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . . " 2 CFR 200.430(i) states in part: "Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; FINDING 2022-002 (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities (for IHE, this per the IHE's definition of IBS); . . . (vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. . . ." 34 CFR 76.730 states: "A State and a subgrantee shall keep records that fully show: (a) The amount of funds under the grant or subgrant; (b) How the State or subgrantee uses the funds; (c) The total cost of the project; (d) The share of that cost provided from other sources; and (e) Other records to facilitate an effective audit." 34 CFR 76.731 states: "A State and a subgrantee shall keep records to show its compliance with program requirements." 7 CFR 220.7(e) states in part: ?. . . the School Food Authority shall, with respect to participating schools under its jurisdiction: (1) . . . . (ii) . . .use all revenues received by such food service only for the operation or improvement of that food service. . . ? 7 CFR 210.14(a) states: ?Nonprofit school food service. School food authorities shall maintain a nonprofit school food service. Revenues received by the nonprofit school food service are to be used only for the operation or improvement of such food service, except that, such revenues shall not be used to purchase land or buildings, unless otherwise approved by FNS, or to construct buildings. Expenditures of nonprofit school food service revenues shall be in accordance with the financial management system established by the State agency under ?210.19(a) of this part. . . . ? Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles and Special Tests & Provisions ? Non-Profit School Food Service Accounts compliance requirements. Cause: Management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles and Special Tests & Provisions ? Non-Profit School Food Service Accounts compliance requirements. Context: The School Corporation did not have effective controls in place to ensure that only applicable employees were paid from program funds. Six of the 24 employees? time charged to the program, did not have adequate documentation to support their wage allocations. The School Corporation paid a portion of the wages for three Elementary School Teachers, two Elementary Instructional Assistants, and one Library Aide from the School Lunch Fund based on fixed percentages. There was no supporting documentation to indicate how the percentages were determined. Wages and benefits charged to the program for the above noted employees totaled $19,073. This amount was considered questions costs. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system by the School Corporation enabled noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles and Special Tests & Provisions - School Food Service Accounts compliance requirements. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles and Special Tests & Provisions ? Non-Profit School Food Service Accounts compliance requirements could result in the loss of federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: $19,073. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls related to the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles and Special Tests & Provisions ? Non-Profit School Food Service Accounts compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-003 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): SY 2020/2021, SY 2021/2022 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: ?The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.? 2 CFR 200.320(b) (Uniform Guidance) states: "Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources." 2 CFR 200.320 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases ? (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states in part: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusion; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person.? Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Cause: Management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Context: Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 for when informal procedures can be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes for three of the five vendors tested that were less than the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000 but exceeded the $10,000 micro-purchase threshold. The micro-purchase threshold may be increased, but the School Corporation did not provide documentation that the threshold had been increased. Documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, was not available for audit. Suspension and Debarment Non-federal entities and contractors are subject to non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or are ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. This is done by checking SAM Exclusions, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. During fiscal years 2020-2021 and 2021-2022, the School Corporation entered into a covered transaction with Stanz Food Service, Inc.. Procedures were not performed to ensure that the vendor was not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from or eligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The lack of controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls related to ensure that 3 quotes are obtained as required for small purchase method procurements and to ensure the vendors are not debarred or suspended. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): SY 2020/2021, SY 2021/2022 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." Condition: An effective internal control system, which would include segregation of duties, was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Cause: Management had not developed or implemented a system of internal control that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Context: The School Corporation had not designed, nor implemented a system of internal control to ensure that the monthly claim for reimbursement were complete and accurately submitted. The monthly claims for reimbursement were prepared by the Food Service Director without an oversight or review process in place to prevent, or detect and correct, errors. The lack of documented controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Effect: The failure to design and implement an effective internal control system could have enabled noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation implement a documented, formal review of the claims before they are submitted for reimbursement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, Special Tests & Provisions ? Non-Profit School Food Service Accounts Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.533, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): SY 2020/2021, SY 2021/2022 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Allowable Cost/Cost Principles, Special Tests & Provisions ? Non-Profit School Food Service Accounts Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . . " 2 CFR 200.430(i) states in part: "Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; FINDING 2022-002 (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities (for IHE, this per the IHE's definition of IBS); . . . (vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. . . ." 34 CFR 76.730 states: "A State and a subgrantee shall keep records that fully show: (a) The amount of funds under the grant or subgrant; (b) How the State or subgrantee uses the funds; (c) The total cost of the project; (d) The share of that cost provided from other sources; and (e) Other records to facilitate an effective audit." 34 CFR 76.731 states: "A State and a subgrantee shall keep records to show its compliance with program requirements." 7 CFR 220.7(e) states in part: ?. . . the School Food Authority shall, with respect to participating schools under its jurisdiction: (1) . . . . (ii) . . .use all revenues received by such food service only for the operation or improvement of that food service. . . ? 7 CFR 210.14(a) states: ?Nonprofit school food service. School food authorities shall maintain a nonprofit school food service. Revenues received by the nonprofit school food service are to be used only for the operation or improvement of such food service, except that, such revenues shall not be used to purchase land or buildings, unless otherwise approved by FNS, or to construct buildings. Expenditures of nonprofit school food service revenues shall be in accordance with the financial management system established by the State agency under ?210.19(a) of this part. . . . ? Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles and Special Tests & Provisions ? Non-Profit School Food Service Accounts compliance requirements. Cause: Management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles and Special Tests & Provisions ? Non-Profit School Food Service Accounts compliance requirements. Context: The School Corporation did not have effective controls in place to ensure that only applicable employees were paid from program funds. Six of the 24 employees? time charged to the program, did not have adequate documentation to support their wage allocations. The School Corporation paid a portion of the wages for three Elementary School Teachers, two Elementary Instructional Assistants, and one Library Aide from the School Lunch Fund based on fixed percentages. There was no supporting documentation to indicate how the percentages were determined. Wages and benefits charged to the program for the above noted employees totaled $19,073. This amount was considered questions costs. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system by the School Corporation enabled noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles and Special Tests & Provisions - School Food Service Accounts compliance requirements. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles and Special Tests & Provisions ? Non-Profit School Food Service Accounts compliance requirements could result in the loss of federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: $19,073. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls related to the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles and Special Tests & Provisions ? Non-Profit School Food Service Accounts compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-003 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): SY 2020/2021, SY 2021/2022 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: ?The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.? 2 CFR 200.320(b) (Uniform Guidance) states: "Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources." 2 CFR 200.320 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases ? (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states in part: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusion; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person.? Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Cause: Management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Context: Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 for when informal procedures can be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes for three of the five vendors tested that were less than the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000 but exceeded the $10,000 micro-purchase threshold. The micro-purchase threshold may be increased, but the School Corporation did not provide documentation that the threshold had been increased. Documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, was not available for audit. Suspension and Debarment Non-federal entities and contractors are subject to non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or are ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. This is done by checking SAM Exclusions, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. During fiscal years 2020-2021 and 2021-2022, the School Corporation entered into a covered transaction with Stanz Food Service, Inc.. Procedures were not performed to ensure that the vendor was not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from or eligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The lack of controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls related to ensure that 3 quotes are obtained as required for small purchase method procurements and to ensure the vendors are not debarred or suspended. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): SY 2020/2021, SY 2021/2022 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." Condition: An effective internal control system, which would include segregation of duties, was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Cause: Management had not developed or implemented a system of internal control that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Context: The School Corporation had not designed, nor implemented a system of internal control to ensure that the monthly claim for reimbursement were complete and accurately submitted. The monthly claims for reimbursement were prepared by the Food Service Director without an oversight or review process in place to prevent, or detect and correct, errors. The lack of documented controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Effect: The failure to design and implement an effective internal control system could have enabled noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation implement a documented, formal review of the claims before they are submitted for reimbursement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-005 Subject: COVID 19- Education Stabilization Fund - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID 19- Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Numbers: 84.425C, 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425C200018, S425D200013, S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." Condition: An effective internal control system was not properly designed nor implemented to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Cause: Management had not developed nor implemented a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Context: The School Corporation had not designed nor implemented a system of internal controls to ensure that documentation regarding the Annual Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) and the Governor's Emergency Education Relief (GEER) annual Data Collection reports were accurately and timely submitted. One employee prepared and submitted the annual Data Collection reports without an oversight or approval process. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system could have enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommend someone other than the preparer of the report perform a documented review prior to submission to validate the accuracy and completeness of the data submitted. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-005 Subject: COVID 19- Education Stabilization Fund - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID 19- Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Numbers: 84.425C, 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425C200018, S425D200013, S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." Condition: An effective internal control system was not properly designed nor implemented to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Cause: Management had not developed nor implemented a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Context: The School Corporation had not designed nor implemented a system of internal controls to ensure that documentation regarding the Annual Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) and the Governor's Emergency Education Relief (GEER) annual Data Collection reports were accurately and timely submitted. One employee prepared and submitted the annual Data Collection reports without an oversight or approval process. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system could have enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommend someone other than the preparer of the report perform a documented review prior to submission to validate the accuracy and completeness of the data submitted. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-005 Subject: COVID 19- Education Stabilization Fund - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID 19- Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Numbers: 84.425C, 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425C200018, S425D200013, S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." Condition: An effective internal control system was not properly designed nor implemented to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Cause: Management had not developed nor implemented a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Context: The School Corporation had not designed nor implemented a system of internal controls to ensure that documentation regarding the Annual Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) and the Governor's Emergency Education Relief (GEER) annual Data Collection reports were accurately and timely submitted. One employee prepared and submitted the annual Data Collection reports without an oversight or approval process. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system could have enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommend someone other than the preparer of the report perform a documented review prior to submission to validate the accuracy and completeness of the data submitted. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-005 Subject: COVID 19- Education Stabilization Fund - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID 19- Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Numbers: 84.425C, 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425C200018, S425D200013, S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." Condition: An effective internal control system was not properly designed nor implemented to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Cause: Management had not developed nor implemented a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Context: The School Corporation had not designed nor implemented a system of internal controls to ensure that documentation regarding the Annual Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) and the Governor's Emergency Education Relief (GEER) annual Data Collection reports were accurately and timely submitted. One employee prepared and submitted the annual Data Collection reports without an oversight or approval process. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system could have enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommend someone other than the preparer of the report perform a documented review prior to submission to validate the accuracy and completeness of the data submitted. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-003 Information on the federal program: Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D200013, S425D210013, S425U200013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.334 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following: (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in ?? 200.328 and 200.329. . . . (3) Records that identify adequately the source and application of funds for federally funded activities. These records must contain information pertaining to Federal awards, authorizations, obligations, unobligated balances, assets, expenditures, income and interest and be supported by source documentation. . . ." 34 CFR 76.722 states: ?A State may require a subgrantee to submit reports in a manner and format that assists the State in complying with the requirements under 34 CFR 76.720 and in carrying out other responsibilities under the program.? Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Three of four annual data reports due and submitted during the audit period were materially misstated. ? The Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER I), Year 2 annual data report understated total expenditures by $145,422. ? The Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER II), Year 1 annual data report overstated total expenditures by $412,355. ? The American Rescue Plan?Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ARP ESSER), Year 1 annual data report overstated total expenditures by $550,973. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Cause: Management had not established a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Reporting compliance requirement. The two overstated reports included expenditures past the reporting period. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-005 Information on the federal program: Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Equipment and Real Property Management Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers: S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Equipment and Real Property Management Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.313(d)(1) states in part: "Property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property (including the federal award identification number), who holds title, the acquisition date, cost of the property, percentage of federal participation in the project costs for the federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sales price of the property" Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Equipment and Real Property Management compliance requirement. A property record or capital asset listing which would include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property (including the federal award identification number), who holds title, the acquisition date, cost of the property, percentage of federal participation in the project costs for the federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, and use and condition of the property is to be maintained for assets purchased that exceed the School Corporation?s capitalization threshold. Additionally, a physical inventory is to be taken and reconciled to the School Corporation?s records once every two years and assets are to be properly maintained and safeguarded to keep the property in good order and prevent loss, damage and theft. The School Corporation did not have policies or procedures in place to ensure that capital assets purchased with federal award funds were added to the capital asset listing, inventoried, and properly maintained and safeguarded. One of the two capital improvement projects completed during the audit period and the paid with Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER II) Fund award was not added to the School Corporation's capital asset listing. As such this asset was not inventoried during the School Corporation?s most recent inventory The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Cause: Management had not established a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Equipment and Real Property Management compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Equipment and Real Property Management compliance requirement could have resulted in the loss of federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Equipment and Real Property Management compliance requirement. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Equipment and Real Property Management compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-003 Information on the federal program: Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D200013, S425D210013, S425U200013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.334 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following: (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in ?? 200.328 and 200.329. . . . (3) Records that identify adequately the source and application of funds for federally funded activities. These records must contain information pertaining to Federal awards, authorizations, obligations, unobligated balances, assets, expenditures, income and interest and be supported by source documentation. . . ." 34 CFR 76.722 states: ?A State may require a subgrantee to submit reports in a manner and format that assists the State in complying with the requirements under 34 CFR 76.720 and in carrying out other responsibilities under the program.? Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Three of four annual data reports due and submitted during the audit period were materially misstated. ? The Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER I), Year 2 annual data report understated total expenditures by $145,422. ? The Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER II), Year 1 annual data report overstated total expenditures by $412,355. ? The American Rescue Plan?Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ARP ESSER), Year 1 annual data report overstated total expenditures by $550,973. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Cause: Management had not established a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Reporting compliance requirement. The two overstated reports included expenditures past the reporting period. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-005 Information on the federal program: Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Equipment and Real Property Management Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers: S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Equipment and Real Property Management Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.313(d)(1) states in part: "Property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property (including the federal award identification number), who holds title, the acquisition date, cost of the property, percentage of federal participation in the project costs for the federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sales price of the property" Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Equipment and Real Property Management compliance requirement. A property record or capital asset listing which would include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property (including the federal award identification number), who holds title, the acquisition date, cost of the property, percentage of federal participation in the project costs for the federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, and use and condition of the property is to be maintained for assets purchased that exceed the School Corporation?s capitalization threshold. Additionally, a physical inventory is to be taken and reconciled to the School Corporation?s records once every two years and assets are to be properly maintained and safeguarded to keep the property in good order and prevent loss, damage and theft. The School Corporation did not have policies or procedures in place to ensure that capital assets purchased with federal award funds were added to the capital asset listing, inventoried, and properly maintained and safeguarded. One of the two capital improvement projects completed during the audit period and the paid with Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER II) Fund award was not added to the School Corporation's capital asset listing. As such this asset was not inventoried during the School Corporation?s most recent inventory The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Cause: Management had not established a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Equipment and Real Property Management compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Equipment and Real Property Management compliance requirement could have resulted in the loss of federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Equipment and Real Property Management compliance requirement. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Equipment and Real Property Management compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-004 Information on the federal program: Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425U Federal Award Number: S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 29 CFR Part 5.5(a)(3) states in part: ?(a) The Agency head shall cause or require the contracting officer to insert in full in any contract in excess of $2,000 which is entered into for the actual construction, alteration and/or repair, including painting and decorating, of a public building or public work, or building or work financed in whole or in part from Federal funds or in accordance with guarantees of a Federal agency or financed from funds obtained by pledge of any contract of a Federal agency to make a loan, grant or annual contribution (except where a different meaning is expressly indicated), and which is subject to the labor standards provisions of any of the acts listed in ?5.1, the following clauses? (1) Minimum wages. (i) All laborers and mechanics employed or working upon the site of the work (or under the United States Housing Act of 1937 or under the Housing Act of 1949 in the construction or development of the project), will be paid unconditionally and not less often than once a week, and without subsequent deduction or rebate on any account (except such payroll deductions as are permitted by regulations issued by the Secretary of Labor under the Copeland Act (29 CFR part 3)), the full amount of wages and bona fide fringe benefits (or cash equivalents thereof) due at time of payment computed at rates not less than those contained in the wage determination of the Secretary of Labor which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, regardless of any contractual relationship which may be alleged to exist between the contractor and such laborers and mechanics? (3)(ii)(A) The contractor shall submit weekly for each week in which any contract work is performed a copy of all payrolls to the (write in name of appropriate federal agency) if the agency is a party to the contract, but if the agency is not such a party, the contractor will submit the payrolls to the applicant, sponsor, or owner, as the case may be, for transmission to the (write in name of agency). . . .? 2 CFR 200 Appendix II states in part: In addition to other provisions required by the Federal agency or non-Federal entity; all contracts made by the non-Federal entity under the Federal award must contain provisions covering the following, as applicable. . . . (D) Davis-Bacon Act, as amended (40 U.S.C. 3141-3148). When required by Federal program legislation, all prime construction contracts in excess of $2,000 awarded by non-Federal entities must include a provision for compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 3141-3144, and 3146-3148) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5, ?Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Covering Federally Financed and Assisted Construction?). In accordance with the statute, contractors must be required to pay wages to laborers and mechanics at a rate not less than the prevailing wages specified in a wage determination made by the Secretary of Labor. In addition, contractors must be required to pay wages not less than once a week.. . .? Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions Wage Rate Requirements compliance requirement. Construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must pay wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor (DOL) to their laborers and mechanics. Nonfederal entities are to include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with these requirements and the DOL regulations. This would include a requirement to submit a copy of the payroll and statement of compliance to the entity for each week in which contract work was performed. The School Corporation did not have adequate policies or procedures to ensure that the one construction contract for an HVAC system in excess of $2,000 paid from the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER III) Fund award included in the contract a provision that the contractor will comply with the DOL regulations or submitted certified payrolls or a statement of compliance. As such neither the certified payrolls nor a statement of compliance were submitted for the project. The construction contract did not include the provision that the contractor will comply with the DOL regulations. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Cause: Management had not established a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions Wage Rate Requirements compliance requirement. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-001 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.533, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 83-8010 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: ?The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.? 2 CFR 200.320(b) states: "Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Cause: Management had not developed nor implemented an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Context: Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation did not follow procurement requirements for purchases of milk and dairy which fell under small purchase procedures. The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes from an adequate number of qualified sources for the one vendor used for the purchase of milk and dairy during FY 2021. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal control to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-001 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.533, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 83-8010 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: ?The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.? 2 CFR 200.320(b) states: "Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Cause: Management had not developed nor implemented an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Context: Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation did not follow procurement requirements for purchases of milk and dairy which fell under small purchase procedures. The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes from an adequate number of qualified sources for the one vendor used for the purchase of milk and dairy during FY 2021. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal control to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-001 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.533, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 83-8010 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: ?The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.? 2 CFR 200.320(b) states: "Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Cause: Management had not developed nor implemented an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Context: Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation did not follow procurement requirements for purchases of milk and dairy which fell under small purchase procedures. The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes from an adequate number of qualified sources for the one vendor used for the purchase of milk and dairy during FY 2021. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal control to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-002 Subject: COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D200013, S425D210013, S425U200013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.334 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: ?The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following: . . . (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in ?? 200.328 and 200.329. . . . (3) Records that identify adequately the source and application of funds for federally funded activities. These records must contain information pertaining to Federal awards, authorizations, obligations, unobligated balances, assets, expenditures, income and interest and be supported by source documentation. . . ." 34 CFR 76.722 states: "A State may require a subgrantee to submit reports in a manner and format that assists the State in complying with the requirements under 34 CFR 76.720 and in carrying out other responsibilities under the program." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Cause: Management had not established an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Context: Although, the School Treasurer and the Superintendent worked independently to compile the information for the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) annual data reports (Reports) reports and then reviewed each other?s notes and prepared the annual date reports, the control was not effective and did not detect and allow correction of errors prior to submission. Due to the lack of effective internal controls, the Reports contained the following errors: -ESSER I, Annual Year 1 Report The School Corporation did not file this report. According to the detailed disbursements, no ESSER funds were expended for the applicable date range. However, the full-time employee numbers should have been reported. These numbers were 117.5 at 3/13/20 and 113.5 at 9/30/20. - ESSER I, Annual Year 2 Report The School Corporation did not enter the correct amounts for the following categories: - Addressing Physical Health & Safety - Personal Services - Salaries. The appropriated amount of $44,000 was reported instead of the actual disbursement of $36,377. - Meeting Student's Academic, Social, Emotional, and Other Needs - Supplies. The appropriated amount of $73,390 was reported instead of the actual disbursement of $796. - ESSER II, Annual Year 2 Report The School Corporation did not enter the correct amount for the Meeting Student?s Academic, Social, Emotional, and Other Needs ? Supplies category. The appropriated amount of $408,715 was report instead of the actual disbursement of $400,439. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-002 Subject: COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D200013, S425D210013, S425U200013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.334 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: ?The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following: . . . (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in ?? 200.328 and 200.329. . . . (3) Records that identify adequately the source and application of funds for federally funded activities. These records must contain information pertaining to Federal awards, authorizations, obligations, unobligated balances, assets, expenditures, income and interest and be supported by source documentation. . . ." 34 CFR 76.722 states: "A State may require a subgrantee to submit reports in a manner and format that assists the State in complying with the requirements under 34 CFR 76.720 and in carrying out other responsibilities under the program." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Cause: Management had not established an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Context: Although, the School Treasurer and the Superintendent worked independently to compile the information for the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) annual data reports (Reports) reports and then reviewed each other?s notes and prepared the annual date reports, the control was not effective and did not detect and allow correction of errors prior to submission. Due to the lack of effective internal controls, the Reports contained the following errors: -ESSER I, Annual Year 1 Report The School Corporation did not file this report. According to the detailed disbursements, no ESSER funds were expended for the applicable date range. However, the full-time employee numbers should have been reported. These numbers were 117.5 at 3/13/20 and 113.5 at 9/30/20. - ESSER I, Annual Year 2 Report The School Corporation did not enter the correct amounts for the following categories: - Addressing Physical Health & Safety - Personal Services - Salaries. The appropriated amount of $44,000 was reported instead of the actual disbursement of $36,377. - Meeting Student's Academic, Social, Emotional, and Other Needs - Supplies. The appropriated amount of $73,390 was reported instead of the actual disbursement of $796. - ESSER II, Annual Year 2 Report The School Corporation did not enter the correct amount for the Meeting Student?s Academic, Social, Emotional, and Other Needs ? Supplies category. The appropriated amount of $408,715 was report instead of the actual disbursement of $400,439. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-002 Subject: COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D200013, S425D210013, S425U200013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.334 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: ?The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following: . . . (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in ?? 200.328 and 200.329. . . . (3) Records that identify adequately the source and application of funds for federally funded activities. These records must contain information pertaining to Federal awards, authorizations, obligations, unobligated balances, assets, expenditures, income and interest and be supported by source documentation. . . ." 34 CFR 76.722 states: "A State may require a subgrantee to submit reports in a manner and format that assists the State in complying with the requirements under 34 CFR 76.720 and in carrying out other responsibilities under the program." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Cause: Management had not established an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Context: Although, the School Treasurer and the Superintendent worked independently to compile the information for the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) annual data reports (Reports) reports and then reviewed each other?s notes and prepared the annual date reports, the control was not effective and did not detect and allow correction of errors prior to submission. Due to the lack of effective internal controls, the Reports contained the following errors: -ESSER I, Annual Year 1 Report The School Corporation did not file this report. According to the detailed disbursements, no ESSER funds were expended for the applicable date range. However, the full-time employee numbers should have been reported. These numbers were 117.5 at 3/13/20 and 113.5 at 9/30/20. - ESSER I, Annual Year 2 Report The School Corporation did not enter the correct amounts for the following categories: - Addressing Physical Health & Safety - Personal Services - Salaries. The appropriated amount of $44,000 was reported instead of the actual disbursement of $36,377. - Meeting Student's Academic, Social, Emotional, and Other Needs - Supplies. The appropriated amount of $73,390 was reported instead of the actual disbursement of $796. - ESSER II, Annual Year 2 Report The School Corporation did not enter the correct amount for the Meeting Student?s Academic, Social, Emotional, and Other Needs ? Supplies category. The appropriated amount of $408,715 was report instead of the actual disbursement of $400,439. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Finding 2022-004 Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster ? Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listing Number: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 19611-007-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards:? (g) Be adequately documented.... " 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed..." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Condition and Context: The School Corporation is a member of the Daviess-Martin Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2020-2021, the Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of all its member schools. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the school corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for non-public school students with disabilities was met for each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure non-public school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 19611-007-PN01 grant award could not be verified for the individual member schools. Total grant expenditures were posted as expended. The nonpublic proportionate share expenditures were then determined by applying the budgeted percentage for non-public school expenditures to the total expenditures. These were the amounts reported to IDOE. As such, we were unable to identify if the minimum amount per the grant awards was expended and properly reported to IDOE as required. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was isolated to the 19611-007-PN01 grant award. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreements and the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. The failure to establish an effective internal control system, as well as adequately document costs of federal awards, prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish an effective system of internal controls, as well as appropriately document and identify federal award expenditures to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Finding 2022-004 Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster ? Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listing Number: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 19611-007-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards:? (g) Be adequately documented.... " 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed..." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Condition and Context: The School Corporation is a member of the Daviess-Martin Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2020-2021, the Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of all its member schools. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the school corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for non-public school students with disabilities was met for each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure non-public school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 19611-007-PN01 grant award could not be verified for the individual member schools. Total grant expenditures were posted as expended. The nonpublic proportionate share expenditures were then determined by applying the budgeted percentage for non-public school expenditures to the total expenditures. These were the amounts reported to IDOE. As such, we were unable to identify if the minimum amount per the grant awards was expended and properly reported to IDOE as required. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was isolated to the 19611-007-PN01 grant award. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreements and the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. The failure to establish an effective internal control system, as well as adequately document costs of federal awards, prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish an effective system of internal controls, as well as appropriately document and identify federal award expenditures to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Finding 2022-004 Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster ? Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listing Number: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 19611-007-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards:? (g) Be adequately documented.... " 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed..." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Condition and Context: The School Corporation is a member of the Daviess-Martin Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2020-2021, the Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of all its member schools. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the school corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for non-public school students with disabilities was met for each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure non-public school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 19611-007-PN01 grant award could not be verified for the individual member schools. Total grant expenditures were posted as expended. The nonpublic proportionate share expenditures were then determined by applying the budgeted percentage for non-public school expenditures to the total expenditures. These were the amounts reported to IDOE. As such, we were unable to identify if the minimum amount per the grant awards was expended and properly reported to IDOE as required. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was isolated to the 19611-007-PN01 grant award. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreements and the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. The failure to establish an effective internal control system, as well as adequately document costs of federal awards, prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish an effective system of internal controls, as well as appropriately document and identify federal award expenditures to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Finding 2022-004 Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster ? Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listing Number: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 19611-007-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards:? (g) Be adequately documented.... " 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed..." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Condition and Context: The School Corporation is a member of the Daviess-Martin Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2020-2021, the Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of all its member schools. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the school corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for non-public school students with disabilities was met for each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure non-public school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 19611-007-PN01 grant award could not be verified for the individual member schools. Total grant expenditures were posted as expended. The nonpublic proportionate share expenditures were then determined by applying the budgeted percentage for non-public school expenditures to the total expenditures. These were the amounts reported to IDOE. As such, we were unable to identify if the minimum amount per the grant awards was expended and properly reported to IDOE as required. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was isolated to the 19611-007-PN01 grant award. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreements and the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. The failure to establish an effective internal control system, as well as adequately document costs of federal awards, prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish an effective system of internal controls, as well as appropriately document and identify federal award expenditures to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Finding 2022-004 Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster ? Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listing Number: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 19611-007-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards:? (g) Be adequately documented.... " 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed..." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Condition and Context: The School Corporation is a member of the Daviess-Martin Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2020-2021, the Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of all its member schools. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the school corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for non-public school students with disabilities was met for each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure non-public school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 19611-007-PN01 grant award could not be verified for the individual member schools. Total grant expenditures were posted as expended. The nonpublic proportionate share expenditures were then determined by applying the budgeted percentage for non-public school expenditures to the total expenditures. These were the amounts reported to IDOE. As such, we were unable to identify if the minimum amount per the grant awards was expended and properly reported to IDOE as required. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was isolated to the 19611-007-PN01 grant award. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreements and the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. The failure to establish an effective internal control system, as well as adequately document costs of federal awards, prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish an effective system of internal controls, as well as appropriately document and identify federal award expenditures to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Finding 2022-004 Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster ? Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listing Number: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 19611-007-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards:? (g) Be adequately documented.... " 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed..." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Condition and Context: The School Corporation is a member of the Daviess-Martin Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2020-2021, the Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of all its member schools. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the school corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for non-public school students with disabilities was met for each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure non-public school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 19611-007-PN01 grant award could not be verified for the individual member schools. Total grant expenditures were posted as expended. The nonpublic proportionate share expenditures were then determined by applying the budgeted percentage for non-public school expenditures to the total expenditures. These were the amounts reported to IDOE. As such, we were unable to identify if the minimum amount per the grant awards was expended and properly reported to IDOE as required. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was isolated to the 19611-007-PN01 grant award. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreements and the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. The failure to establish an effective internal control system, as well as adequately document costs of federal awards, prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish an effective system of internal controls, as well as appropriately document and identify federal award expenditures to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, After School Snack Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2021, FY2022 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . . 2 CFR 200.430(i) states in part: "Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities (for IHE, this per the IHE?s definition of IBS); . . . . (iv) Support the distribution of the employee?s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and a non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect costs activity. . . .? Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with the requirements related to the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not designed or implemented internal controls which would have ensured compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system could enable material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements listed above could have resulted in the loss of funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation had not designed or implemented adequate internal controls to ensure that payroll disbursements were only for food service-related services. Payroll disbursements comprise approximately 45% of the program costs charged to the Child Nutrition Cluster. One employee was responsible for processing payroll. Payroll reports were submitted to the School Board and Treasurer for review and approval; however, the reports only provided a total gross amount paid from each fund. The reports did not list the employees who were paid from the fund. In March 2021, the Treasurer implemented a review of the payroll distribution report, which is broken out by fund and individual employee. The lack of controls related to payroll disbursements was isolated to the 2020-21 year. Additionally, payroll disbursements for custodial employees were allocated to the Child Nutrition Cluster based on a percentage of the custodial employees? salaries. However, there were no time and effort logs or other documentation maintained to support the percentage of the custodial salaries allocated to the Child Nutrition Cluster. The custodial salaries make up approximately 3% of the total payroll disbursements charged to the Child Nutrition Cluster. This was an issue throughout the audit period. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: Yes, see Finding 2020-004 Recommendation: We recommended that management continue to document controls surrounding payroll disbursement through review of the payroll distribution report each pay period. Additionally, we recommended that the School maintain written documentation supporting the portion of salaries paid from the School Lunch fund for custodial personnel. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, After School Snack Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2021, FY2022 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . . 2 CFR 200.430(i) states in part: "Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities (for IHE, this per the IHE?s definition of IBS); . . . . (iv) Support the distribution of the employee?s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and a non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect costs activity. . . .? Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with the requirements related to the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not designed or implemented internal controls which would have ensured compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system could enable material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements listed above could have resulted in the loss of funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation had not designed or implemented adequate internal controls to ensure that payroll disbursements were only for food service-related services. Payroll disbursements comprise approximately 45% of the program costs charged to the Child Nutrition Cluster. One employee was responsible for processing payroll. Payroll reports were submitted to the School Board and Treasurer for review and approval; however, the reports only provided a total gross amount paid from each fund. The reports did not list the employees who were paid from the fund. In March 2021, the Treasurer implemented a review of the payroll distribution report, which is broken out by fund and individual employee. The lack of controls related to payroll disbursements was isolated to the 2020-21 year. Additionally, payroll disbursements for custodial employees were allocated to the Child Nutrition Cluster based on a percentage of the custodial employees? salaries. However, there were no time and effort logs or other documentation maintained to support the percentage of the custodial salaries allocated to the Child Nutrition Cluster. The custodial salaries make up approximately 3% of the total payroll disbursements charged to the Child Nutrition Cluster. This was an issue throughout the audit period. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: Yes, see Finding 2020-004 Recommendation: We recommended that management continue to document controls surrounding payroll disbursement through review of the payroll distribution report each pay period. Additionally, we recommended that the School maintain written documentation supporting the portion of salaries paid from the School Lunch fund for custodial personnel. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, After School Snack Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2021, FY2022 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . . 2 CFR 200.430(i) states in part: "Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities (for IHE, this per the IHE?s definition of IBS); . . . . (iv) Support the distribution of the employee?s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and a non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect costs activity. . . .? Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with the requirements related to the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not designed or implemented internal controls which would have ensured compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system could enable material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements listed above could have resulted in the loss of funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation had not designed or implemented adequate internal controls to ensure that payroll disbursements were only for food service-related services. Payroll disbursements comprise approximately 45% of the program costs charged to the Child Nutrition Cluster. One employee was responsible for processing payroll. Payroll reports were submitted to the School Board and Treasurer for review and approval; however, the reports only provided a total gross amount paid from each fund. The reports did not list the employees who were paid from the fund. In March 2021, the Treasurer implemented a review of the payroll distribution report, which is broken out by fund and individual employee. The lack of controls related to payroll disbursements was isolated to the 2020-21 year. Additionally, payroll disbursements for custodial employees were allocated to the Child Nutrition Cluster based on a percentage of the custodial employees? salaries. However, there were no time and effort logs or other documentation maintained to support the percentage of the custodial salaries allocated to the Child Nutrition Cluster. The custodial salaries make up approximately 3% of the total payroll disbursements charged to the Child Nutrition Cluster. This was an issue throughout the audit period. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: Yes, see Finding 2020-004 Recommendation: We recommended that management continue to document controls surrounding payroll disbursement through review of the payroll distribution report each pay period. Additionally, we recommended that the School maintain written documentation supporting the portion of salaries paid from the School Lunch fund for custodial personnel. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, After School Snack Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2021, FY2022 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . . 2 CFR 200.430(i) states in part: "Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities (for IHE, this per the IHE?s definition of IBS); . . . . (iv) Support the distribution of the employee?s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and a non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect costs activity. . . .? Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with the requirements related to the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not designed or implemented internal controls which would have ensured compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system could enable material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements listed above could have resulted in the loss of funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation had not designed or implemented adequate internal controls to ensure that payroll disbursements were only for food service-related services. Payroll disbursements comprise approximately 45% of the program costs charged to the Child Nutrition Cluster. One employee was responsible for processing payroll. Payroll reports were submitted to the School Board and Treasurer for review and approval; however, the reports only provided a total gross amount paid from each fund. The reports did not list the employees who were paid from the fund. In March 2021, the Treasurer implemented a review of the payroll distribution report, which is broken out by fund and individual employee. The lack of controls related to payroll disbursements was isolated to the 2020-21 year. Additionally, payroll disbursements for custodial employees were allocated to the Child Nutrition Cluster based on a percentage of the custodial employees? salaries. However, there were no time and effort logs or other documentation maintained to support the percentage of the custodial salaries allocated to the Child Nutrition Cluster. The custodial salaries make up approximately 3% of the total payroll disbursements charged to the Child Nutrition Cluster. This was an issue throughout the audit period. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: Yes, see Finding 2020-004 Recommendation: We recommended that management continue to document controls surrounding payroll disbursement through review of the payroll distribution report each pay period. Additionally, we recommended that the School maintain written documentation supporting the portion of salaries paid from the School Lunch fund for custodial personnel. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.