FINDING 2022-006 Information on the federal program: Subject: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - Special Tests and Provisions - Assessment System Security Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Assistance Listing Number: 84.010 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S010A170014; S010A190014; S010A200014 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions - Assessment System Security Audit Findings: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a)Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that providesreasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliancewith Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Theseinternal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in theFederal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal ControlIntegrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the TreadwayCommission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.207(a) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may impose additional specific award conditions as needed. . . ." 511 IAC 5-5-5(b) states: "Any individual who administers, handles, or has access to secure test materials at the school or school corporation shall complete assessment training and sign a testing security and integrity agreement to remain on file in the appropriate building-level office each year." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions - Assessment System Security compliance requirement. Cause: Management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Special Tests and Provisions - Assessment System Security compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions - Assessment System Security compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation had not established effective internal controls to ensure applicable employees received proper training over test and security administration. The School Corporation had implemented a policy in which all applicable employees were to be provided training annually. However, documentation of training for six of 40 employees could not be provided. The six employees were in a position and location that had contact with the testing materials and therefore should have received the training. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and Special Tests and Provisions - Assessment System Security compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-007 Information on the federal program: Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Equipment and Real Property Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425C, 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D200013, S425D210013, S425U210013, S425C200018 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Equipment and Real Property Management Audit Findings: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.313(d) states in part: ?(1) Property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of dunking for the property (including the federal award identification number), who holds title, the acquisition date, cost of the property, percentage of federal participation in the project costs for the federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sales price of the property" (2) A physical inventory of the property must be taken, and the results reconciled with the property records at least once every two years. (3) A control system must be developed to ensure adequate safeguards to prevent loss, damage, or theft of the property. Any loss, damage, or theft must be investigated. (4) Adequate maintenance procedures must be developed to keep the property in good condition.? Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Equipment and Real Property Management compliance requirement. Cause: Management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Equipment and Real Property Management compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Equipment and Real Property Management compliance requirement could have resulted in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation did not have an effective control in place to ensure property records were properly maintained and included all required information. The School Corporation's property record did not include the following required information: a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property (including the federal award identification number), who holds title, percentage of federal participation in the project costs for the federal award under which the property was acquired, use and condition of the property. The School Corporation did not perform a physical inventory of equipment during the audit period and did not have an internal control system in place to ensure a physical inventory was performed. There was no internal control system in place to ensure equipment was appropriately safeguarded and maintained. There was no evidence to show all equipment included on the property records was being appropriately safeguarded and maintained during the audit period. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Equipment and Real Property Management compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-008 Information on the federal program: Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425C, 84.425D Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D200013, S425C200018 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a)Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonableassurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes,regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be incompliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by theComptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by theCommittee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following . . . (2)Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program inaccordance with the reporting requirements set forth in ?? 200.328 and 200.329. . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Cause: Management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation did not have an effective system of internal controls to ensure that the annual Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) and the Governor?s Emergency Education Relief (GEER) annual Data Collection reports (Reports) were accurately submitted. The School Corporation had six annual data reports due during the audit period. The Full Time Equivalent (FTE) key line item on both the ESSER I, Fiscal Year 2021 and the GEER, Fiscal Year 2021 annual Data Collection reports were not accurately submitted. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the ESSER 1, Fiscal Year 2021 and GEER, Fiscal Year 2021 reports. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No Recommendation: We recommend that the School Corporation's management establish effective internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-007 Information on the federal program: Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Equipment and Real Property Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425C, 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D200013, S425D210013, S425U210013, S425C200018 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Equipment and Real Property Management Audit Findings: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.313(d) states in part: ?(1) Property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of dunking for the property (including the federal award identification number), who holds title, the acquisition date, cost of the property, percentage of federal participation in the project costs for the federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sales price of the property" (2) A physical inventory of the property must be taken, and the results reconciled with the property records at least once every two years. (3) A control system must be developed to ensure adequate safeguards to prevent loss, damage, or theft of the property. Any loss, damage, or theft must be investigated. (4) Adequate maintenance procedures must be developed to keep the property in good condition.? Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Equipment and Real Property Management compliance requirement. Cause: Management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Equipment and Real Property Management compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Equipment and Real Property Management compliance requirement could have resulted in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation did not have an effective control in place to ensure property records were properly maintained and included all required information. The School Corporation's property record did not include the following required information: a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property (including the federal award identification number), who holds title, percentage of federal participation in the project costs for the federal award under which the property was acquired, use and condition of the property. The School Corporation did not perform a physical inventory of equipment during the audit period and did not have an internal control system in place to ensure a physical inventory was performed. There was no internal control system in place to ensure equipment was appropriately safeguarded and maintained. There was no evidence to show all equipment included on the property records was being appropriately safeguarded and maintained during the audit period. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Equipment and Real Property Management compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-008 Information on the federal program: Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425C, 84.425D Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D200013, S425C200018 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a)Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonableassurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes,regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be incompliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by theComptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by theCommittee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following . . . (2)Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program inaccordance with the reporting requirements set forth in ?? 200.328 and 200.329. . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Cause: Management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation did not have an effective system of internal controls to ensure that the annual Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) and the Governor?s Emergency Education Relief (GEER) annual Data Collection reports (Reports) were accurately submitted. The School Corporation had six annual data reports due during the audit period. The Full Time Equivalent (FTE) key line item on both the ESSER I, Fiscal Year 2021 and the GEER, Fiscal Year 2021 annual Data Collection reports were not accurately submitted. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the ESSER 1, Fiscal Year 2021 and GEER, Fiscal Year 2021 reports. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No Recommendation: We recommend that the School Corporation's management establish effective internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-007 Information on the federal program: Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Equipment and Real Property Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425C, 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D200013, S425D210013, S425U210013, S425C200018 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Equipment and Real Property Management Audit Findings: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.313(d) states in part: ?(1) Property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of dunking for the property (including the federal award identification number), who holds title, the acquisition date, cost of the property, percentage of federal participation in the project costs for the federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sales price of the property" (2) A physical inventory of the property must be taken, and the results reconciled with the property records at least once every two years. (3) A control system must be developed to ensure adequate safeguards to prevent loss, damage, or theft of the property. Any loss, damage, or theft must be investigated. (4) Adequate maintenance procedures must be developed to keep the property in good condition.? Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Equipment and Real Property Management compliance requirement. Cause: Management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Equipment and Real Property Management compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Equipment and Real Property Management compliance requirement could have resulted in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation did not have an effective control in place to ensure property records were properly maintained and included all required information. The School Corporation's property record did not include the following required information: a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property (including the federal award identification number), who holds title, percentage of federal participation in the project costs for the federal award under which the property was acquired, use and condition of the property. The School Corporation did not perform a physical inventory of equipment during the audit period and did not have an internal control system in place to ensure a physical inventory was performed. There was no internal control system in place to ensure equipment was appropriately safeguarded and maintained. There was no evidence to show all equipment included on the property records was being appropriately safeguarded and maintained during the audit period. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Equipment and Real Property Management compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-008 Information on the federal program: Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425C, 84.425D Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D200013, S425C200018 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a)Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonableassurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes,regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be incompliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by theComptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by theCommittee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following . . . (2)Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program inaccordance with the reporting requirements set forth in ?? 200.328 and 200.329. . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Cause: Management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation did not have an effective system of internal controls to ensure that the annual Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) and the Governor?s Emergency Education Relief (GEER) annual Data Collection reports (Reports) were accurately submitted. The School Corporation had six annual data reports due during the audit period. The Full Time Equivalent (FTE) key line item on both the ESSER I, Fiscal Year 2021 and the GEER, Fiscal Year 2021 annual Data Collection reports were not accurately submitted. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the ESSER 1, Fiscal Year 2021 and GEER, Fiscal Year 2021 reports. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No Recommendation: We recommend that the School Corporation's management establish effective internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-007 Information on the federal program: Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Equipment and Real Property Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425C, 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D200013, S425D210013, S425U210013, S425C200018 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Equipment and Real Property Management Audit Findings: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.313(d) states in part: ?(1) Property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of dunking for the property (including the federal award identification number), who holds title, the acquisition date, cost of the property, percentage of federal participation in the project costs for the federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sales price of the property" (2) A physical inventory of the property must be taken, and the results reconciled with the property records at least once every two years. (3) A control system must be developed to ensure adequate safeguards to prevent loss, damage, or theft of the property. Any loss, damage, or theft must be investigated. (4) Adequate maintenance procedures must be developed to keep the property in good condition.? Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Equipment and Real Property Management compliance requirement. Cause: Management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Equipment and Real Property Management compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Equipment and Real Property Management compliance requirement could have resulted in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation did not have an effective control in place to ensure property records were properly maintained and included all required information. The School Corporation's property record did not include the following required information: a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property (including the federal award identification number), who holds title, percentage of federal participation in the project costs for the federal award under which the property was acquired, use and condition of the property. The School Corporation did not perform a physical inventory of equipment during the audit period and did not have an internal control system in place to ensure a physical inventory was performed. There was no internal control system in place to ensure equipment was appropriately safeguarded and maintained. There was no evidence to show all equipment included on the property records was being appropriately safeguarded and maintained during the audit period. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Equipment and Real Property Management compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-008 Information on the federal program: Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425C, 84.425D Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D200013, S425C200018 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a)Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonableassurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes,regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be incompliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by theComptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by theCommittee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following . . . (2)Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program inaccordance with the reporting requirements set forth in ?? 200.328 and 200.329. . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Cause: Management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation did not have an effective system of internal controls to ensure that the annual Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) and the Governor?s Emergency Education Relief (GEER) annual Data Collection reports (Reports) were accurately submitted. The School Corporation had six annual data reports due during the audit period. The Full Time Equivalent (FTE) key line item on both the ESSER I, Fiscal Year 2021 and the GEER, Fiscal Year 2021 annual Data Collection reports were not accurately submitted. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the ESSER 1, Fiscal Year 2021 and GEER, Fiscal Year 2021 reports. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No Recommendation: We recommend that the School Corporation's management establish effective internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
2022-005 IMPACT AID GRANT - IMPACT AID WAGE RATE REQUIREMENTS ? ALN 84.041 ? MATERIAL WEAKNESS FINDING TYPE: Material Weakness Finding 2022-005 Federal Program: Impact Aid ALN: 84.041 Federal Award Number(s) and Year(s): S041B226254, 2022 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Questioned Cost: $0 Condition Oberon Public School District did not have any procedures in place relating to the internal controls surrounding the Wage Rate Requirements applicable to the Impact Aid Grant funds for the construction of the new school. Effect Oberon Public School increases its risk of noncompliance with the Wage Rate Requirements relating to Impact Aid without proper internal controls. Cause Oberon Public School District was not aware of the Wage Rate Requirements applicable to construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303(a) states that non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Questioned Costs None. Prior Recommendation Yes. Recommendation We recommend Oberon Public School District implement procedures to ensure compliance with the Wage Rate Requirements. Oberon Public School District?s Response See Corrective Action Plan.
FINDING 2022-002 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the reporting compliance requirement. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the reporting requirements. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: We noted that for four sponsor claim reimbursements in a sample of four claims, the Food Service Director prepared the sponsor claim reimbursement summary without a secondary, documented review before the submission of the claim to ensure the accuracy of the sponsor claim reimbursement summary. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation implement a documented, formal review of the claims before they are submitted for reimbursement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: For the views of the responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-002 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the reporting compliance requirement. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the reporting requirements. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: We noted that for four sponsor claim reimbursements in a sample of four claims, the Food Service Director prepared the sponsor claim reimbursement summary without a secondary, documented review before the submission of the claim to ensure the accuracy of the sponsor claim reimbursement summary. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation implement a documented, formal review of the claims before they are submitted for reimbursement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: For the views of the responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-002 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the reporting compliance requirement. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the reporting requirements. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: We noted that for four sponsor claim reimbursements in a sample of four claims, the Food Service Director prepared the sponsor claim reimbursement summary without a secondary, documented review before the submission of the claim to ensure the accuracy of the sponsor claim reimbursement summary. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation implement a documented, formal review of the claims before they are submitted for reimbursement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: For the views of the responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-002 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the reporting compliance requirement. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the reporting requirements. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: We noted that for four sponsor claim reimbursements in a sample of four claims, the Food Service Director prepared the sponsor claim reimbursement summary without a secondary, documented review before the submission of the claim to ensure the accuracy of the sponsor claim reimbursement summary. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation implement a documented, formal review of the claims before they are submitted for reimbursement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: For the views of the responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-003 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster- Allowable Activities, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Lunch Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.555 Federal Award Number(s) and Year(s)(or Other Identifying Numbers): Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Allowable Activities, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Finding: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." USDA Indirect Cost Guidance Memo SP 60-2016 "It is unallowable to bill the nonprofit school food service account (NSFSA) for indirect costs that were previously paid from the general fund unless an agreement exists to show that the district had been ?loaning? the NSFSA funds to cover the indirect costs in one or more prior years." 7 CFR 210.21(f)(1) states in part: ". . . (ii) (A) The contractor must separately identify for each cost submitted for payment to the school food authority the amount of that cost that is allowable (can be paid from the nonprofit school food service account) and the amount that is unallowable (cannot be paid from the nonprofit school food service account); or (B) The contractor must exclude all unallowable costs from its billing documents and certify that only allowable costs are submitted for payment and records have been established that maintain the visibility of unallowable costs, including directly associated costs in a manner suitable for contract cost determination and verification; (iii) The contractor's determination of its allowable costs must be made in compliance with the applicable Departmental and Program regulations and Office of Management and Budget cost circulars; . . . (vi) The contractor must maintain documentation of costs and discounts, rebates and other applicable credits, and must furnish such documentation upon request to the school food authority, the State agency, or the Department." Section III ? Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (Continued) FINDING 2021-003 (Continued) 7 CFR 220.7(e) states in part: ". . . the School Food Authority shall, with respect to participating schools under its jurisdiction: (i) Maintain a nonprofit school food service; (ii) . . . use all revenues received by such food service only for the operation or improvement of that food service . . ." 7 CFR 210.14(a) states in part: "Nonprofit school food service. School food authorities shall maintain a nonprofit school food service. Revenues received by the nonprofit school food service are to be used only for the operation or improvement of such food service, except that, such revenues shall not be used to purchase land or buildings, unless otherwise approved by FNS, or to construct buildings. . . ." 7 CFR 225.15(a)(1) states: "Sponsors shall operate the food service in accordance with: the provisions of this part; any instructions and handbooks issued by FNS under this part; and any instructions and handbooks issued by the State agency which are not inconsistent with the provisions of this part." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.430(i) states in part: "Standards for documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities (for IHE, this per the IHE's definition of IBS); (vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. . . ." Section III ? Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (Continued) FINDING 2021-003 (Continued) Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Allowable Activities and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. The School Corporation did not have a documented internal control over payroll claims allocation reports in place relating to the Allowable Activities and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. The School Corporation did not have internal controls over indirect costs that would ensure they were properly paid. Cause: Management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $74,500 were identified. Context: The School Corporation was approved for an indirect cost rate for fiscal years 2019-2020 and 2020-2021 in order to allocate indirect costs to the School Corporation?s Cafeteria fund. However, the School Corporation did not charge these indirect costs in the appropriate time frame. On June 30, 2022 the School Corporation applied the indirect costs retroactively for the child nutrition cluster fiscal year's 2019-2020 and 2020-2021 in the amounts of approximately $33,150 and $41,350, respectively from the Cafeteria Fund to the Operations Fund. For after the fact transfers, the School Corporation is required to enter into an inter-fund loan agreement and to document the Operation fund support of the School Lunch fund. The School Corporation did not have a documented internal control over payroll claims in place relating to the Allowable Activities and Allowable Costs compliance requirements. There was no documented, formal review over the supporting payroll distribution report to support the amount charged and allocated for each employee. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls for the timing of indirect costs claims and transfers. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management understands the finding, has prepared an initial corrective action plan and will discuss resolution with Indiana Department of Education.
Finding 2022-004 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster ? Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: National School Lunch Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20-21, FY 21-22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.214 States in part: "Non-federal entities and contractors are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities." 2CFR 200.318 (a) states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327." (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. Section III ? Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (Continued) FINDING 2021-004 (Continued) (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases? (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." Indiana Code 5-22-8-3 states in part: "(a) . . . if the purchasing agent expects the purchase to be: (1) at least fifty thousand dollars ($50,000); and (2) not more than one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). . . . (d) . . . the purchasing agent shall award a contract to the lowest responsible and responsive offeror for each line or class of supplies required. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. There was no documented control over procurements made under the small purchase threshold. Cause: Management had not developed a system of internal control that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation did not provide audit evidence that it verified that vendors which were paid $25,000 or more per school year were not excluded or disqualified from participation in federal award programs. Section III ? Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (Continued) FINDING 2021-004 (Continued) Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Finding 2022-005 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: National School Lunch Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20-21, FY 21-22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following . . . (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in ?? 200.328 and 200.329. . . ." 34 CFR 76.722 states: "A State may require a subgrantee to submit reports in a manner and format that assists the State in complying with the requirements under 34 CFR 76.720 and in carrying out other responsibilities under the program." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Child Nutrition Cluster - Reporting compliance requirements. Section III ? Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (Continued) FINDING 2021-005 (Continued) Cause: Management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: There was no documented control in place over the preparation/submission of monthly CNC reimbursement claims. The Food Service Director prepares the monthly reimbursement claims, however, there was no documentation that the reimbursement claims had been reviewed anyone other than the preparer. This was a systemic issue through the audit period. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a documented system of internal control for review and approval related to the grant?s reporting compliance requirements Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Finding 2022-006 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - School Food Accounts Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: National School Lunch Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20-21, FY 21-22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement(s): Special Tests and Provisions -School Food Accounts Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions School Food Accounts compliance requirement. Section III ? Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (Continued) FINDING 2021-006 (Continued) Cause: Management had not developed a system of internal control that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Special Test and Provision School Food Accounts compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions -School Food Accounts compliance requirement. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: There was no documented secondary, formal review over the receipting of monies received/deposited from the IDOE for monthly Child Nutrition Cluster reimbursement claims to make sure the receipts are properly posted to the school lunch food. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal control related to the grant agreement and the and the Special Tests and Provisions -School Food Accounts compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-003 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster- Allowable Activities, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Lunch Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.555 Federal Award Number(s) and Year(s)(or Other Identifying Numbers): Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Allowable Activities, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Finding: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." USDA Indirect Cost Guidance Memo SP 60-2016 "It is unallowable to bill the nonprofit school food service account (NSFSA) for indirect costs that were previously paid from the general fund unless an agreement exists to show that the district had been ?loaning? the NSFSA funds to cover the indirect costs in one or more prior years." 7 CFR 210.21(f)(1) states in part: ". . . (ii) (A) The contractor must separately identify for each cost submitted for payment to the school food authority the amount of that cost that is allowable (can be paid from the nonprofit school food service account) and the amount that is unallowable (cannot be paid from the nonprofit school food service account); or (B) The contractor must exclude all unallowable costs from its billing documents and certify that only allowable costs are submitted for payment and records have been established that maintain the visibility of unallowable costs, including directly associated costs in a manner suitable for contract cost determination and verification; (iii) The contractor's determination of its allowable costs must be made in compliance with the applicable Departmental and Program regulations and Office of Management and Budget cost circulars; . . . (vi) The contractor must maintain documentation of costs and discounts, rebates and other applicable credits, and must furnish such documentation upon request to the school food authority, the State agency, or the Department." Section III ? Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (Continued) FINDING 2021-003 (Continued) 7 CFR 220.7(e) states in part: ". . . the School Food Authority shall, with respect to participating schools under its jurisdiction: (i) Maintain a nonprofit school food service; (ii) . . . use all revenues received by such food service only for the operation or improvement of that food service . . ." 7 CFR 210.14(a) states in part: "Nonprofit school food service. School food authorities shall maintain a nonprofit school food service. Revenues received by the nonprofit school food service are to be used only for the operation or improvement of such food service, except that, such revenues shall not be used to purchase land or buildings, unless otherwise approved by FNS, or to construct buildings. . . ." 7 CFR 225.15(a)(1) states: "Sponsors shall operate the food service in accordance with: the provisions of this part; any instructions and handbooks issued by FNS under this part; and any instructions and handbooks issued by the State agency which are not inconsistent with the provisions of this part." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.430(i) states in part: "Standards for documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities (for IHE, this per the IHE's definition of IBS); (vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. . . ." Section III ? Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (Continued) FINDING 2021-003 (Continued) Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Allowable Activities and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. The School Corporation did not have a documented internal control over payroll claims allocation reports in place relating to the Allowable Activities and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. The School Corporation did not have internal controls over indirect costs that would ensure they were properly paid. Cause: Management had not developed an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $74,500 were identified. Context: The School Corporation was approved for an indirect cost rate for fiscal years 2019-2020 and 2020-2021 in order to allocate indirect costs to the School Corporation?s Cafeteria fund. However, the School Corporation did not charge these indirect costs in the appropriate time frame. On June 30, 2022 the School Corporation applied the indirect costs retroactively for the child nutrition cluster fiscal year's 2019-2020 and 2020-2021 in the amounts of approximately $33,150 and $41,350, respectively from the Cafeteria Fund to the Operations Fund. For after the fact transfers, the School Corporation is required to enter into an inter-fund loan agreement and to document the Operation fund support of the School Lunch fund. The School Corporation did not have a documented internal control over payroll claims in place relating to the Allowable Activities and Allowable Costs compliance requirements. There was no documented, formal review over the supporting payroll distribution report to support the amount charged and allocated for each employee. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls for the timing of indirect costs claims and transfers. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management understands the finding, has prepared an initial corrective action plan and will discuss resolution with Indiana Department of Education.
Finding 2022-004 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster ? Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: National School Lunch Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20-21, FY 21-22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.214 States in part: "Non-federal entities and contractors are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities." 2CFR 200.318 (a) states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327." (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. Section III ? Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (Continued) FINDING 2021-004 (Continued) (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases? (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." Indiana Code 5-22-8-3 states in part: "(a) . . . if the purchasing agent expects the purchase to be: (1) at least fifty thousand dollars ($50,000); and (2) not more than one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). . . . (d) . . . the purchasing agent shall award a contract to the lowest responsible and responsive offeror for each line or class of supplies required. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. There was no documented control over procurements made under the small purchase threshold. Cause: Management had not developed a system of internal control that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation did not provide audit evidence that it verified that vendors which were paid $25,000 or more per school year were not excluded or disqualified from participation in federal award programs. Section III ? Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (Continued) FINDING 2021-004 (Continued) Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Finding 2022-005 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: National School Lunch Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20-21, FY 21-22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following . . . (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in ?? 200.328 and 200.329. . . ." 34 CFR 76.722 states: "A State may require a subgrantee to submit reports in a manner and format that assists the State in complying with the requirements under 34 CFR 76.720 and in carrying out other responsibilities under the program." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Child Nutrition Cluster - Reporting compliance requirements. Section III ? Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (Continued) FINDING 2021-005 (Continued) Cause: Management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: There was no documented control in place over the preparation/submission of monthly CNC reimbursement claims. The Food Service Director prepares the monthly reimbursement claims, however, there was no documentation that the reimbursement claims had been reviewed anyone other than the preparer. This was a systemic issue through the audit period. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a documented system of internal control for review and approval related to the grant?s reporting compliance requirements Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Finding 2022-006 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - School Food Accounts Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: National School Lunch Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20-21, FY 21-22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement(s): Special Tests and Provisions -School Food Accounts Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions School Food Accounts compliance requirement. Section III ? Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (Continued) FINDING 2021-006 (Continued) Cause: Management had not developed a system of internal control that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Special Test and Provision School Food Accounts compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions -School Food Accounts compliance requirement. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: There was no documented secondary, formal review over the receipting of monies received/deposited from the IDOE for monthly Child Nutrition Cluster reimbursement claims to make sure the receipts are properly posted to the school lunch food. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal control related to the grant agreement and the and the Special Tests and Provisions -School Food Accounts compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Finding 2022-007 Information on the federal program: Subject: COVID-19 ? Education Stabilization Fund ? Allowable Activities, Allowable Costs/Costs Principles Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D200013, S425U200013, S425D200013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Allowable Activities, Allowable Costs/Costs Principles Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Allowable Activities, Allowable Costs/Costs Principles compliance requirement. Cause: Management had not developed and a system of internal control that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation did not have a documented internal control over payroll claims in place relating to the Allowable Activities and Allowable Costs compliance requirements. There was no documented, formal review over the supporting payroll distribution report to support the amount charged and allocated for each employee to the ESSER funds. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Allowable Activities, Allowable Costs/Costs Principles compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Finding 2022-008 Information on the federal program: Subject: COVID -19 - Education Stabilization Fund ? Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D200013, S425U200013, S425D200013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Cause: Management had not developed a system of internal control that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation was required to submit two Annual Data Reports to the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) to meet federal reporting requirements for ESSER and GEER grant awards. The first report was for the period of March 13, 2020 to September 30, 2020 and was due by January 21, 2021. The second report was for the period of October 1, 2020 to June 30, 2021 and was due by May 13, 2022. We noted the for both reports that were submitted, there was no documented review by someone other than the preparer of the report to ensure the information submitted was complete and accurate. Management stated that there was a review of the report submissions, however it was not documented in writing. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish internal controls for review and approval documentation to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Finding 2022-007 Information on the federal program: Subject: COVID-19 ? Education Stabilization Fund ? Allowable Activities, Allowable Costs/Costs Principles Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D200013, S425U200013, S425D200013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Allowable Activities, Allowable Costs/Costs Principles Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Allowable Activities, Allowable Costs/Costs Principles compliance requirement. Cause: Management had not developed and a system of internal control that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation did not have a documented internal control over payroll claims in place relating to the Allowable Activities and Allowable Costs compliance requirements. There was no documented, formal review over the supporting payroll distribution report to support the amount charged and allocated for each employee to the ESSER funds. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Allowable Activities, Allowable Costs/Costs Principles compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Finding 2022-008 Information on the federal program: Subject: COVID -19 - Education Stabilization Fund ? Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D200013, S425U200013, S425D200013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Cause: Management had not developed a system of internal control that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation was required to submit two Annual Data Reports to the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) to meet federal reporting requirements for ESSER and GEER grant awards. The first report was for the period of March 13, 2020 to September 30, 2020 and was due by January 21, 2021. The second report was for the period of October 1, 2020 to June 30, 2021 and was due by May 13, 2022. We noted the for both reports that were submitted, there was no documented review by someone other than the preparer of the report to ensure the information submitted was complete and accurate. Management stated that there was a review of the report submissions, however it was not documented in writing. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish internal controls for review and approval documentation to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Finding 2022-007 Information on the federal program: Subject: COVID-19 ? Education Stabilization Fund ? Allowable Activities, Allowable Costs/Costs Principles Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D200013, S425U200013, S425D200013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Allowable Activities, Allowable Costs/Costs Principles Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Allowable Activities, Allowable Costs/Costs Principles compliance requirement. Cause: Management had not developed and a system of internal control that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation did not have a documented internal control over payroll claims in place relating to the Allowable Activities and Allowable Costs compliance requirements. There was no documented, formal review over the supporting payroll distribution report to support the amount charged and allocated for each employee to the ESSER funds. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Allowable Activities, Allowable Costs/Costs Principles compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Program Name: Federal Transit Cluster CFDA No.: 20.500/20.507/20.525 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Transportation Award No. and Year: Various Program Name: Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and Safety Improvements Program CFDA No.: 20.325 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Transportation Award No. and Year: Various Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Criteria: 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), Internal Controls, states that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Title 2 CFR Section 200.214 of the Uniform Guidance states that SCRRA must comply with 2 CFR part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The 2022 Compliance Supplement states: Non-Federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. ?Covered transactions? include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a passthrough entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. When a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) and available at https://www.sam.gov/SAM/, (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR section 180.300). Condition: During our testing of SCRRA?s provisions for procurement requirements for the FTA program, we noted six (6) of the fourteen (14) contracts selected for testing where there was no evidence that SCRRA verified the entity was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction, prior to entering the contract, in accordance with SCRRA?s policy. During our testing of SCRRA?s provisions for procurement requirements for the CRISI program, we noted four (4) of the four (4) contracts selected for testing where there was no evidence that SCRRA verified the entity was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction, prior to entering the contract, in accordance with SCRRA?s policy. Cause: SCRRA did not adhere to established policies and procedures to verify the information described in the condition prior to entering the transactions. Effect: SCRRA?s control was not consistently applied, which required verification of suspension or debarment prior to entering the contract. However, the verification of suspension and debarment was subsequently performed and documented by SCRRA. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of fourteen (14) out of seventy-two (72) procurement contracts were selected for procurement and suspension and debarment testing for the FTA program. A nonstatistical sample of four (4) out of (4) procurement contracts were selected for procurement and suspension and debarment testing for the CRISI program. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): Yes Southern California Regional Rail Authority Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs Year Ended June 30, 2022 Recommendation: We recommend SCRRA adhere to their procurement procedures requiring the suspension or debarment verification is performed prior to entering into a covered transaction. Views of Responsible Officials: Management Agrees. See separate corrective action plan.
Program Name: Federal Transit Cluster CFDA No.: 20.500/20.507/20.525 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Transportation Award No. and Year: Various Program Name: Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and Safety Improvements Program CFDA No.: 20.325 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Transportation Award No. and Year: Various Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Criteria: 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), Internal Controls, states that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Title 2 CFR Section 200.214 of the Uniform Guidance states that SCRRA must comply with 2 CFR part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The 2022 Compliance Supplement states: Non-Federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. ?Covered transactions? include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a passthrough entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. When a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) and available at https://www.sam.gov/SAM/, (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR section 180.300). Condition: During our testing of SCRRA?s provisions for procurement requirements for the FTA program, we noted six (6) of the fourteen (14) contracts selected for testing where there was no evidence that SCRRA verified the entity was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction, prior to entering the contract, in accordance with SCRRA?s policy. During our testing of SCRRA?s provisions for procurement requirements for the CRISI program, we noted four (4) of the four (4) contracts selected for testing where there was no evidence that SCRRA verified the entity was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction, prior to entering the contract, in accordance with SCRRA?s policy. Cause: SCRRA did not adhere to established policies and procedures to verify the information described in the condition prior to entering the transactions. Effect: SCRRA?s control was not consistently applied, which required verification of suspension or debarment prior to entering the contract. However, the verification of suspension and debarment was subsequently performed and documented by SCRRA. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of fourteen (14) out of seventy-two (72) procurement contracts were selected for procurement and suspension and debarment testing for the FTA program. A nonstatistical sample of four (4) out of (4) procurement contracts were selected for procurement and suspension and debarment testing for the CRISI program. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): Yes Southern California Regional Rail Authority Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs Year Ended June 30, 2022 Recommendation: We recommend SCRRA adhere to their procurement procedures requiring the suspension or debarment verification is performed prior to entering into a covered transaction. Views of Responsible Officials: Management Agrees. See separate corrective action plan.
Program Name: Federal Transit Cluster CFDA No.: 20.500/20.507/20.525 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Transportation Award No. and Year: Various Program Name: Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and Safety Improvements Program CFDA No.: 20.325 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Transportation Award No. and Year: Various Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Criteria: 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), Internal Controls, states that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Title 2 CFR Section 200.214 of the Uniform Guidance states that SCRRA must comply with 2 CFR part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The 2022 Compliance Supplement states: Non-Federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. ?Covered transactions? include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a passthrough entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. When a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) and available at https://www.sam.gov/SAM/, (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR section 180.300). Condition: During our testing of SCRRA?s provisions for procurement requirements for the FTA program, we noted six (6) of the fourteen (14) contracts selected for testing where there was no evidence that SCRRA verified the entity was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction, prior to entering the contract, in accordance with SCRRA?s policy. During our testing of SCRRA?s provisions for procurement requirements for the CRISI program, we noted four (4) of the four (4) contracts selected for testing where there was no evidence that SCRRA verified the entity was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction, prior to entering the contract, in accordance with SCRRA?s policy. Cause: SCRRA did not adhere to established policies and procedures to verify the information described in the condition prior to entering the transactions. Effect: SCRRA?s control was not consistently applied, which required verification of suspension or debarment prior to entering the contract. However, the verification of suspension and debarment was subsequently performed and documented by SCRRA. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of fourteen (14) out of seventy-two (72) procurement contracts were selected for procurement and suspension and debarment testing for the FTA program. A nonstatistical sample of four (4) out of (4) procurement contracts were selected for procurement and suspension and debarment testing for the CRISI program. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): Yes Southern California Regional Rail Authority Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs Year Ended June 30, 2022 Recommendation: We recommend SCRRA adhere to their procurement procedures requiring the suspension or debarment verification is performed prior to entering into a covered transaction. Views of Responsible Officials: Management Agrees. See separate corrective action plan.
Program Name: Federal Transit Cluster CFDA No.: 20.500/20.507/20.525 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Transportation Award No. and Year: Various Program Name: Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and Safety Improvements Program CFDA No.: 20.325 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Transportation Award No. and Year: Various Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Criteria: 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), Internal Controls, states that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Title 2 CFR Section 200.214 of the Uniform Guidance states that SCRRA must comply with 2 CFR part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The 2022 Compliance Supplement states: Non-Federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. ?Covered transactions? include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a passthrough entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. When a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) and available at https://www.sam.gov/SAM/, (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR section 180.300). Condition: During our testing of SCRRA?s provisions for procurement requirements for the FTA program, we noted six (6) of the fourteen (14) contracts selected for testing where there was no evidence that SCRRA verified the entity was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction, prior to entering the contract, in accordance with SCRRA?s policy. During our testing of SCRRA?s provisions for procurement requirements for the CRISI program, we noted four (4) of the four (4) contracts selected for testing where there was no evidence that SCRRA verified the entity was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction, prior to entering the contract, in accordance with SCRRA?s policy. Cause: SCRRA did not adhere to established policies and procedures to verify the information described in the condition prior to entering the transactions. Effect: SCRRA?s control was not consistently applied, which required verification of suspension or debarment prior to entering the contract. However, the verification of suspension and debarment was subsequently performed and documented by SCRRA. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of fourteen (14) out of seventy-two (72) procurement contracts were selected for procurement and suspension and debarment testing for the FTA program. A nonstatistical sample of four (4) out of (4) procurement contracts were selected for procurement and suspension and debarment testing for the CRISI program. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): Yes Southern California Regional Rail Authority Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs Year Ended June 30, 2022 Recommendation: We recommend SCRRA adhere to their procurement procedures requiring the suspension or debarment verification is performed prior to entering into a covered transaction. Views of Responsible Officials: Management Agrees. See separate corrective action plan.
Program Name: Federal Transit Cluster CFDA No.: 20.500/20.507/20.525 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Transportation Award No. and Year: Various Program Name: Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and Safety Improvements Program CFDA No.: 20.325 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Transportation Award No. and Year: Various Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Criteria: 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), Internal Controls, states that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Title 2 CFR Section 200.214 of the Uniform Guidance states that SCRRA must comply with 2 CFR part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The 2022 Compliance Supplement states: Non-Federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. ?Covered transactions? include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a passthrough entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. When a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) and available at https://www.sam.gov/SAM/, (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR section 180.300). Condition: During our testing of SCRRA?s provisions for procurement requirements for the FTA program, we noted six (6) of the fourteen (14) contracts selected for testing where there was no evidence that SCRRA verified the entity was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction, prior to entering the contract, in accordance with SCRRA?s policy. During our testing of SCRRA?s provisions for procurement requirements for the CRISI program, we noted four (4) of the four (4) contracts selected for testing where there was no evidence that SCRRA verified the entity was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction, prior to entering the contract, in accordance with SCRRA?s policy. Cause: SCRRA did not adhere to established policies and procedures to verify the information described in the condition prior to entering the transactions. Effect: SCRRA?s control was not consistently applied, which required verification of suspension or debarment prior to entering the contract. However, the verification of suspension and debarment was subsequently performed and documented by SCRRA. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of fourteen (14) out of seventy-two (72) procurement contracts were selected for procurement and suspension and debarment testing for the FTA program. A nonstatistical sample of four (4) out of (4) procurement contracts were selected for procurement and suspension and debarment testing for the CRISI program. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): Yes Southern California Regional Rail Authority Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs Year Ended June 30, 2022 Recommendation: We recommend SCRRA adhere to their procurement procedures requiring the suspension or debarment verification is performed prior to entering into a covered transaction. Views of Responsible Officials: Management Agrees. See separate corrective action plan.
Program Name: Federal Transit Cluster CFDA No.: 20.500/20.507/20.525 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Transportation Award No. and Year: Various Program Name: Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and Safety Improvements Program CFDA No.: 20.325 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Transportation Award No. and Year: Various Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Criteria: 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), Internal Controls, states that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Title 2 CFR Section 200.214 of the Uniform Guidance states that SCRRA must comply with 2 CFR part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The 2022 Compliance Supplement states: Non-Federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. ?Covered transactions? include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a passthrough entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. When a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) and available at https://www.sam.gov/SAM/, (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR section 180.300). Condition: During our testing of SCRRA?s provisions for procurement requirements for the FTA program, we noted six (6) of the fourteen (14) contracts selected for testing where there was no evidence that SCRRA verified the entity was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction, prior to entering the contract, in accordance with SCRRA?s policy. During our testing of SCRRA?s provisions for procurement requirements for the CRISI program, we noted four (4) of the four (4) contracts selected for testing where there was no evidence that SCRRA verified the entity was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction, prior to entering the contract, in accordance with SCRRA?s policy. Cause: SCRRA did not adhere to established policies and procedures to verify the information described in the condition prior to entering the transactions. Effect: SCRRA?s control was not consistently applied, which required verification of suspension or debarment prior to entering the contract. However, the verification of suspension and debarment was subsequently performed and documented by SCRRA. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of fourteen (14) out of seventy-two (72) procurement contracts were selected for procurement and suspension and debarment testing for the FTA program. A nonstatistical sample of four (4) out of (4) procurement contracts were selected for procurement and suspension and debarment testing for the CRISI program. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): Yes Southern California Regional Rail Authority Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs Year Ended June 30, 2022 Recommendation: We recommend SCRRA adhere to their procurement procedures requiring the suspension or debarment verification is performed prior to entering into a covered transaction. Views of Responsible Officials: Management Agrees. See separate corrective action plan.
Program Name: Federal Transit Cluster CFDA No.: 20.500/20.507/20.525 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Transportation Award No. and Year: Various Program Name: Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and Safety Improvements Program CFDA No.: 20.325 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Transportation Award No. and Year: Various Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Criteria: 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), Internal Controls, states that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Title 2 CFR Section 200.214 of the Uniform Guidance states that SCRRA must comply with 2 CFR part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The 2022 Compliance Supplement states: Non-Federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. ?Covered transactions? include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a passthrough entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. When a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) and available at https://www.sam.gov/SAM/, (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR section 180.300). Condition: During our testing of SCRRA?s provisions for procurement requirements for the FTA program, we noted six (6) of the fourteen (14) contracts selected for testing where there was no evidence that SCRRA verified the entity was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction, prior to entering the contract, in accordance with SCRRA?s policy. During our testing of SCRRA?s provisions for procurement requirements for the CRISI program, we noted four (4) of the four (4) contracts selected for testing where there was no evidence that SCRRA verified the entity was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction, prior to entering the contract, in accordance with SCRRA?s policy. Cause: SCRRA did not adhere to established policies and procedures to verify the information described in the condition prior to entering the transactions. Effect: SCRRA?s control was not consistently applied, which required verification of suspension or debarment prior to entering the contract. However, the verification of suspension and debarment was subsequently performed and documented by SCRRA. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of fourteen (14) out of seventy-two (72) procurement contracts were selected for procurement and suspension and debarment testing for the FTA program. A nonstatistical sample of four (4) out of (4) procurement contracts were selected for procurement and suspension and debarment testing for the CRISI program. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): Yes Southern California Regional Rail Authority Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs Year Ended June 30, 2022 Recommendation: We recommend SCRRA adhere to their procurement procedures requiring the suspension or debarment verification is performed prior to entering into a covered transaction. Views of Responsible Officials: Management Agrees. See separate corrective action plan.
Program Name: Federal Transit Cluster CFDA No.: 20.500/20.507/20.525 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Transportation Award No. and Year: Various Program Name: Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and Safety Improvements Program CFDA No.: 20.325 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Transportation Award No. and Year: Various Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Criteria: 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), Internal Controls, states that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Title 2 CFR Section 200.214 of the Uniform Guidance states that SCRRA must comply with 2 CFR part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The 2022 Compliance Supplement states: Non-Federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. ?Covered transactions? include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a passthrough entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. When a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) and available at https://www.sam.gov/SAM/, (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR section 180.300). Condition: During our testing of SCRRA?s provisions for procurement requirements for the FTA program, we noted six (6) of the fourteen (14) contracts selected for testing where there was no evidence that SCRRA verified the entity was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction, prior to entering the contract, in accordance with SCRRA?s policy. During our testing of SCRRA?s provisions for procurement requirements for the CRISI program, we noted four (4) of the four (4) contracts selected for testing where there was no evidence that SCRRA verified the entity was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction, prior to entering the contract, in accordance with SCRRA?s policy. Cause: SCRRA did not adhere to established policies and procedures to verify the information described in the condition prior to entering the transactions. Effect: SCRRA?s control was not consistently applied, which required verification of suspension or debarment prior to entering the contract. However, the verification of suspension and debarment was subsequently performed and documented by SCRRA. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of fourteen (14) out of seventy-two (72) procurement contracts were selected for procurement and suspension and debarment testing for the FTA program. A nonstatistical sample of four (4) out of (4) procurement contracts were selected for procurement and suspension and debarment testing for the CRISI program. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): Yes Southern California Regional Rail Authority Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs Year Ended June 30, 2022 Recommendation: We recommend SCRRA adhere to their procurement procedures requiring the suspension or debarment verification is performed prior to entering into a covered transaction. Views of Responsible Officials: Management Agrees. See separate corrective action plan.
Program Name: Federal Transit Cluster CFDA No.: 20.500/20.507/20.525 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Transportation Award No. and Year: Various Program Name: Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and Safety Improvements Program CFDA No.: 20.325 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Transportation Award No. and Year: Various Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Criteria: 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), Internal Controls, states that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Title 2 CFR Section 200.214 of the Uniform Guidance states that SCRRA must comply with 2 CFR part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The 2022 Compliance Supplement states: Non-Federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. ?Covered transactions? include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a passthrough entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. When a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) and available at https://www.sam.gov/SAM/, (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR section 180.300). Condition: During our testing of SCRRA?s provisions for procurement requirements for the FTA program, we noted six (6) of the fourteen (14) contracts selected for testing where there was no evidence that SCRRA verified the entity was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction, prior to entering the contract, in accordance with SCRRA?s policy. During our testing of SCRRA?s provisions for procurement requirements for the CRISI program, we noted four (4) of the four (4) contracts selected for testing where there was no evidence that SCRRA verified the entity was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction, prior to entering the contract, in accordance with SCRRA?s policy. Cause: SCRRA did not adhere to established policies and procedures to verify the information described in the condition prior to entering the transactions. Effect: SCRRA?s control was not consistently applied, which required verification of suspension or debarment prior to entering the contract. However, the verification of suspension and debarment was subsequently performed and documented by SCRRA. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of fourteen (14) out of seventy-two (72) procurement contracts were selected for procurement and suspension and debarment testing for the FTA program. A nonstatistical sample of four (4) out of (4) procurement contracts were selected for procurement and suspension and debarment testing for the CRISI program. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): Yes Southern California Regional Rail Authority Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs Year Ended June 30, 2022 Recommendation: We recommend SCRRA adhere to their procurement procedures requiring the suspension or debarment verification is performed prior to entering into a covered transaction. Views of Responsible Officials: Management Agrees. See separate corrective action plan.
Program Name: Federal Transit Cluster CFDA No.: 20.500/20.507/20.525 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Transportation Award No. and Year: Various Program Name: Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and Safety Improvements Program CFDA No.: 20.325 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Transportation Award No. and Year: Various Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Criteria: 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), Internal Controls, states that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Title 2 CFR Section 200.214 of the Uniform Guidance states that SCRRA must comply with 2 CFR part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The 2022 Compliance Supplement states: Non-Federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. ?Covered transactions? include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a passthrough entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. When a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) and available at https://www.sam.gov/SAM/, (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR section 180.300). Condition: During our testing of SCRRA?s provisions for procurement requirements for the FTA program, we noted six (6) of the fourteen (14) contracts selected for testing where there was no evidence that SCRRA verified the entity was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction, prior to entering the contract, in accordance with SCRRA?s policy. During our testing of SCRRA?s provisions for procurement requirements for the CRISI program, we noted four (4) of the four (4) contracts selected for testing where there was no evidence that SCRRA verified the entity was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction, prior to entering the contract, in accordance with SCRRA?s policy. Cause: SCRRA did not adhere to established policies and procedures to verify the information described in the condition prior to entering the transactions. Effect: SCRRA?s control was not consistently applied, which required verification of suspension or debarment prior to entering the contract. However, the verification of suspension and debarment was subsequently performed and documented by SCRRA. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of fourteen (14) out of seventy-two (72) procurement contracts were selected for procurement and suspension and debarment testing for the FTA program. A nonstatistical sample of four (4) out of (4) procurement contracts were selected for procurement and suspension and debarment testing for the CRISI program. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): Yes Southern California Regional Rail Authority Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs Year Ended June 30, 2022 Recommendation: We recommend SCRRA adhere to their procurement procedures requiring the suspension or debarment verification is performed prior to entering into a covered transaction. Views of Responsible Officials: Management Agrees. See separate corrective action plan.
Program Name: Federal Transit Cluster CFDA No.: 20.500/20.507/20.525 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Transportation Award No. and Year: Various Program Name: Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and Safety Improvements Program CFDA No.: 20.325 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Transportation Award No. and Year: Various Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Criteria: 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), Internal Controls, states that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Title 2 CFR Section 200.214 of the Uniform Guidance states that SCRRA must comply with 2 CFR part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The 2022 Compliance Supplement states: Non-Federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. ?Covered transactions? include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a passthrough entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. When a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) and available at https://www.sam.gov/SAM/, (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR section 180.300). Condition: During our testing of SCRRA?s provisions for procurement requirements for the FTA program, we noted six (6) of the fourteen (14) contracts selected for testing where there was no evidence that SCRRA verified the entity was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction, prior to entering the contract, in accordance with SCRRA?s policy. During our testing of SCRRA?s provisions for procurement requirements for the CRISI program, we noted four (4) of the four (4) contracts selected for testing where there was no evidence that SCRRA verified the entity was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction, prior to entering the contract, in accordance with SCRRA?s policy. Cause: SCRRA did not adhere to established policies and procedures to verify the information described in the condition prior to entering the transactions. Effect: SCRRA?s control was not consistently applied, which required verification of suspension or debarment prior to entering the contract. However, the verification of suspension and debarment was subsequently performed and documented by SCRRA. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of fourteen (14) out of seventy-two (72) procurement contracts were selected for procurement and suspension and debarment testing for the FTA program. A nonstatistical sample of four (4) out of (4) procurement contracts were selected for procurement and suspension and debarment testing for the CRISI program. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): Yes Southern California Regional Rail Authority Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs Year Ended June 30, 2022 Recommendation: We recommend SCRRA adhere to their procurement procedures requiring the suspension or debarment verification is performed prior to entering into a covered transaction. Views of Responsible Officials: Management Agrees. See separate corrective action plan.
Program Name: Federal Transit Cluster CFDA No.: 20.500/20.507/20.525 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Transportation Award No. and Year: Various Program Name: Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and Safety Improvements Program CFDA No.: 20.325 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Transportation Award No. and Year: Various Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Criteria: 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), Internal Controls, states that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Title 2 CFR Section 200.214 of the Uniform Guidance states that SCRRA must comply with 2 CFR part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The 2022 Compliance Supplement states: Non-Federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. ?Covered transactions? include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a passthrough entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. When a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) and available at https://www.sam.gov/SAM/, (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR section 180.300). Condition: During our testing of SCRRA?s provisions for procurement requirements for the FTA program, we noted six (6) of the fourteen (14) contracts selected for testing where there was no evidence that SCRRA verified the entity was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction, prior to entering the contract, in accordance with SCRRA?s policy. During our testing of SCRRA?s provisions for procurement requirements for the CRISI program, we noted four (4) of the four (4) contracts selected for testing where there was no evidence that SCRRA verified the entity was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction, prior to entering the contract, in accordance with SCRRA?s policy. Cause: SCRRA did not adhere to established policies and procedures to verify the information described in the condition prior to entering the transactions. Effect: SCRRA?s control was not consistently applied, which required verification of suspension or debarment prior to entering the contract. However, the verification of suspension and debarment was subsequently performed and documented by SCRRA. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of fourteen (14) out of seventy-two (72) procurement contracts were selected for procurement and suspension and debarment testing for the FTA program. A nonstatistical sample of four (4) out of (4) procurement contracts were selected for procurement and suspension and debarment testing for the CRISI program. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): Yes Southern California Regional Rail Authority Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs Year Ended June 30, 2022 Recommendation: We recommend SCRRA adhere to their procurement procedures requiring the suspension or debarment verification is performed prior to entering into a covered transaction. Views of Responsible Officials: Management Agrees. See separate corrective action plan.
Program Name: Federal Transit Cluster CFDA No.: 20.500/20.507/20.525 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Transportation Award No. and Year: Various Program Name: Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and Safety Improvements Program CFDA No.: 20.325 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Transportation Award No. and Year: Various Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Criteria: 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), Internal Controls, states that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Title 2 CFR Section 200.214 of the Uniform Guidance states that SCRRA must comply with 2 CFR part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The 2022 Compliance Supplement states: Non-Federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. ?Covered transactions? include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a passthrough entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. When a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) and available at https://www.sam.gov/SAM/, (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR section 180.300). Condition: During our testing of SCRRA?s provisions for procurement requirements for the FTA program, we noted six (6) of the fourteen (14) contracts selected for testing where there was no evidence that SCRRA verified the entity was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction, prior to entering the contract, in accordance with SCRRA?s policy. During our testing of SCRRA?s provisions for procurement requirements for the CRISI program, we noted four (4) of the four (4) contracts selected for testing where there was no evidence that SCRRA verified the entity was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction, prior to entering the contract, in accordance with SCRRA?s policy. Cause: SCRRA did not adhere to established policies and procedures to verify the information described in the condition prior to entering the transactions. Effect: SCRRA?s control was not consistently applied, which required verification of suspension or debarment prior to entering the contract. However, the verification of suspension and debarment was subsequently performed and documented by SCRRA. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of fourteen (14) out of seventy-two (72) procurement contracts were selected for procurement and suspension and debarment testing for the FTA program. A nonstatistical sample of four (4) out of (4) procurement contracts were selected for procurement and suspension and debarment testing for the CRISI program. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): Yes Southern California Regional Rail Authority Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs Year Ended June 30, 2022 Recommendation: We recommend SCRRA adhere to their procurement procedures requiring the suspension or debarment verification is performed prior to entering into a covered transaction. Views of Responsible Officials: Management Agrees. See separate corrective action plan.
Program Name: Federal Transit Cluster CFDA No.: 20.500/20.507/20.525 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Transportation Award No. and Year: Various Program Name: Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and Safety Improvements Program CFDA No.: 20.325 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Transportation Award No. and Year: Various Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Criteria: 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), Internal Controls, states that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Title 2 CFR Section 200.214 of the Uniform Guidance states that SCRRA must comply with 2 CFR part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The 2022 Compliance Supplement states: Non-Federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. ?Covered transactions? include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a passthrough entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. When a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) and available at https://www.sam.gov/SAM/, (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR section 180.300). Condition: During our testing of SCRRA?s provisions for procurement requirements for the FTA program, we noted six (6) of the fourteen (14) contracts selected for testing where there was no evidence that SCRRA verified the entity was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction, prior to entering the contract, in accordance with SCRRA?s policy. During our testing of SCRRA?s provisions for procurement requirements for the CRISI program, we noted four (4) of the four (4) contracts selected for testing where there was no evidence that SCRRA verified the entity was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction, prior to entering the contract, in accordance with SCRRA?s policy. Cause: SCRRA did not adhere to established policies and procedures to verify the information described in the condition prior to entering the transactions. Effect: SCRRA?s control was not consistently applied, which required verification of suspension or debarment prior to entering the contract. However, the verification of suspension and debarment was subsequently performed and documented by SCRRA. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of fourteen (14) out of seventy-two (72) procurement contracts were selected for procurement and suspension and debarment testing for the FTA program. A nonstatistical sample of four (4) out of (4) procurement contracts were selected for procurement and suspension and debarment testing for the CRISI program. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): Yes Southern California Regional Rail Authority Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs Year Ended June 30, 2022 Recommendation: We recommend SCRRA adhere to their procurement procedures requiring the suspension or debarment verification is performed prior to entering into a covered transaction. Views of Responsible Officials: Management Agrees. See separate corrective action plan.
Program Name: Federal Transit Cluster CFDA No.: 20.500/20.507/20.525 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Transportation Award No. and Year: Various Program Name: Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and Safety Improvements Program CFDA No.: 20.325 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Transportation Award No. and Year: Various Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Criteria: 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), Internal Controls, states that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Title 2 CFR Section 200.214 of the Uniform Guidance states that SCRRA must comply with 2 CFR part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The 2022 Compliance Supplement states: Non-Federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. ?Covered transactions? include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a passthrough entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. When a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) and available at https://www.sam.gov/SAM/, (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR section 180.300). Condition: During our testing of SCRRA?s provisions for procurement requirements for the FTA program, we noted six (6) of the fourteen (14) contracts selected for testing where there was no evidence that SCRRA verified the entity was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction, prior to entering the contract, in accordance with SCRRA?s policy. During our testing of SCRRA?s provisions for procurement requirements for the CRISI program, we noted four (4) of the four (4) contracts selected for testing where there was no evidence that SCRRA verified the entity was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction, prior to entering the contract, in accordance with SCRRA?s policy. Cause: SCRRA did not adhere to established policies and procedures to verify the information described in the condition prior to entering the transactions. Effect: SCRRA?s control was not consistently applied, which required verification of suspension or debarment prior to entering the contract. However, the verification of suspension and debarment was subsequently performed and documented by SCRRA. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of fourteen (14) out of seventy-two (72) procurement contracts were selected for procurement and suspension and debarment testing for the FTA program. A nonstatistical sample of four (4) out of (4) procurement contracts were selected for procurement and suspension and debarment testing for the CRISI program. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): Yes Southern California Regional Rail Authority Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs Year Ended June 30, 2022 Recommendation: We recommend SCRRA adhere to their procurement procedures requiring the suspension or debarment verification is performed prior to entering into a covered transaction. Views of Responsible Officials: Management Agrees. See separate corrective action plan.
Program Name: Federal Transit Cluster CFDA No.: 20.500/20.507/20.525 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Transportation Award No. and Year: Various Program Name: Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and Safety Improvements Program CFDA No.: 20.325 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Transportation Award No. and Year: Various Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Criteria: 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), Internal Controls, states that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Title 2 CFR Section 200.214 of the Uniform Guidance states that SCRRA must comply with 2 CFR part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The 2022 Compliance Supplement states: Non-Federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. ?Covered transactions? include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a passthrough entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. When a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) and available at https://www.sam.gov/SAM/, (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR section 180.300). Condition: During our testing of SCRRA?s provisions for procurement requirements for the FTA program, we noted six (6) of the fourteen (14) contracts selected for testing where there was no evidence that SCRRA verified the entity was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction, prior to entering the contract, in accordance with SCRRA?s policy. During our testing of SCRRA?s provisions for procurement requirements for the CRISI program, we noted four (4) of the four (4) contracts selected for testing where there was no evidence that SCRRA verified the entity was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction, prior to entering the contract, in accordance with SCRRA?s policy. Cause: SCRRA did not adhere to established policies and procedures to verify the information described in the condition prior to entering the transactions. Effect: SCRRA?s control was not consistently applied, which required verification of suspension or debarment prior to entering the contract. However, the verification of suspension and debarment was subsequently performed and documented by SCRRA. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of fourteen (14) out of seventy-two (72) procurement contracts were selected for procurement and suspension and debarment testing for the FTA program. A nonstatistical sample of four (4) out of (4) procurement contracts were selected for procurement and suspension and debarment testing for the CRISI program. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): Yes Southern California Regional Rail Authority Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs Year Ended June 30, 2022 Recommendation: We recommend SCRRA adhere to their procurement procedures requiring the suspension or debarment verification is performed prior to entering into a covered transaction. Views of Responsible Officials: Management Agrees. See separate corrective action plan.
Program Name: Federal Transit Cluster CFDA No.: 20.500/20.507/20.525 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Transportation Award No. and Year: Various Program Name: Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and Safety Improvements Program CFDA No.: 20.325 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Transportation Award No. and Year: Various Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Criteria: 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), Internal Controls, states that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Title 2 CFR Section 200.214 of the Uniform Guidance states that SCRRA must comply with 2 CFR part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The 2022 Compliance Supplement states: Non-Federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. ?Covered transactions? include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a passthrough entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. When a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) and available at https://www.sam.gov/SAM/, (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR section 180.300). Condition: During our testing of SCRRA?s provisions for procurement requirements for the FTA program, we noted six (6) of the fourteen (14) contracts selected for testing where there was no evidence that SCRRA verified the entity was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction, prior to entering the contract, in accordance with SCRRA?s policy. During our testing of SCRRA?s provisions for procurement requirements for the CRISI program, we noted four (4) of the four (4) contracts selected for testing where there was no evidence that SCRRA verified the entity was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction, prior to entering the contract, in accordance with SCRRA?s policy. Cause: SCRRA did not adhere to established policies and procedures to verify the information described in the condition prior to entering the transactions. Effect: SCRRA?s control was not consistently applied, which required verification of suspension or debarment prior to entering the contract. However, the verification of suspension and debarment was subsequently performed and documented by SCRRA. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of fourteen (14) out of seventy-two (72) procurement contracts were selected for procurement and suspension and debarment testing for the FTA program. A nonstatistical sample of four (4) out of (4) procurement contracts were selected for procurement and suspension and debarment testing for the CRISI program. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): Yes Southern California Regional Rail Authority Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs Year Ended June 30, 2022 Recommendation: We recommend SCRRA adhere to their procurement procedures requiring the suspension or debarment verification is performed prior to entering into a covered transaction. Views of Responsible Officials: Management Agrees. See separate corrective action plan.
Program Name: Federal Transit Cluster CFDA No.: 20.500/20.507/20.525 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Transportation Award No. and Year: Various Program Name: Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and Safety Improvements Program CFDA No.: 20.325 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Transportation Award No. and Year: Various Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Criteria: 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), Internal Controls, states that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Title 2 CFR Section 200.214 of the Uniform Guidance states that SCRRA must comply with 2 CFR part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The 2022 Compliance Supplement states: Non-Federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. ?Covered transactions? include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a passthrough entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. When a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) and available at https://www.sam.gov/SAM/, (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR section 180.300). Condition: During our testing of SCRRA?s provisions for procurement requirements for the FTA program, we noted six (6) of the fourteen (14) contracts selected for testing where there was no evidence that SCRRA verified the entity was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction, prior to entering the contract, in accordance with SCRRA?s policy. During our testing of SCRRA?s provisions for procurement requirements for the CRISI program, we noted four (4) of the four (4) contracts selected for testing where there was no evidence that SCRRA verified the entity was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction, prior to entering the contract, in accordance with SCRRA?s policy. Cause: SCRRA did not adhere to established policies and procedures to verify the information described in the condition prior to entering the transactions. Effect: SCRRA?s control was not consistently applied, which required verification of suspension or debarment prior to entering the contract. However, the verification of suspension and debarment was subsequently performed and documented by SCRRA. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of fourteen (14) out of seventy-two (72) procurement contracts were selected for procurement and suspension and debarment testing for the FTA program. A nonstatistical sample of four (4) out of (4) procurement contracts were selected for procurement and suspension and debarment testing for the CRISI program. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): Yes Southern California Regional Rail Authority Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs Year Ended June 30, 2022 Recommendation: We recommend SCRRA adhere to their procurement procedures requiring the suspension or debarment verification is performed prior to entering into a covered transaction. Views of Responsible Officials: Management Agrees. See separate corrective action plan.
Program Name: Federal Transit Cluster CFDA No.: 20.500/20.507/20.525 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Transportation Award No. and Year: Various Program Name: Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and Safety Improvements Program CFDA No.: 20.325 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Transportation Award No. and Year: Various Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Criteria: 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), Internal Controls, states that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Title 2 CFR Section 200.214 of the Uniform Guidance states that SCRRA must comply with 2 CFR part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The 2022 Compliance Supplement states: Non-Federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. ?Covered transactions? include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a passthrough entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. When a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) and available at https://www.sam.gov/SAM/, (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR section 180.300). Condition: During our testing of SCRRA?s provisions for procurement requirements for the FTA program, we noted six (6) of the fourteen (14) contracts selected for testing where there was no evidence that SCRRA verified the entity was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction, prior to entering the contract, in accordance with SCRRA?s policy. During our testing of SCRRA?s provisions for procurement requirements for the CRISI program, we noted four (4) of the four (4) contracts selected for testing where there was no evidence that SCRRA verified the entity was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction, prior to entering the contract, in accordance with SCRRA?s policy. Cause: SCRRA did not adhere to established policies and procedures to verify the information described in the condition prior to entering the transactions. Effect: SCRRA?s control was not consistently applied, which required verification of suspension or debarment prior to entering the contract. However, the verification of suspension and debarment was subsequently performed and documented by SCRRA. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of fourteen (14) out of seventy-two (72) procurement contracts were selected for procurement and suspension and debarment testing for the FTA program. A nonstatistical sample of four (4) out of (4) procurement contracts were selected for procurement and suspension and debarment testing for the CRISI program. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): Yes Southern California Regional Rail Authority Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs Year Ended June 30, 2022 Recommendation: We recommend SCRRA adhere to their procurement procedures requiring the suspension or debarment verification is performed prior to entering into a covered transaction. Views of Responsible Officials: Management Agrees. See separate corrective action plan.
Program Name: Federal Transit Cluster CFDA No.: 20.500/20.507/20.525 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Transportation Award No. and Year: Various Program Name: Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and Safety Improvements Program CFDA No.: 20.325 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Transportation Award No. and Year: Various Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Criteria: 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), Internal Controls, states that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Title 2 CFR Section 200.214 of the Uniform Guidance states that SCRRA must comply with 2 CFR part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The 2022 Compliance Supplement states: Non-Federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. ?Covered transactions? include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a passthrough entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. When a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) and available at https://www.sam.gov/SAM/, (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR section 180.300). Condition: During our testing of SCRRA?s provisions for procurement requirements for the FTA program, we noted six (6) of the fourteen (14) contracts selected for testing where there was no evidence that SCRRA verified the entity was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction, prior to entering the contract, in accordance with SCRRA?s policy. During our testing of SCRRA?s provisions for procurement requirements for the CRISI program, we noted four (4) of the four (4) contracts selected for testing where there was no evidence that SCRRA verified the entity was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction, prior to entering the contract, in accordance with SCRRA?s policy. Cause: SCRRA did not adhere to established policies and procedures to verify the information described in the condition prior to entering the transactions. Effect: SCRRA?s control was not consistently applied, which required verification of suspension or debarment prior to entering the contract. However, the verification of suspension and debarment was subsequently performed and documented by SCRRA. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of fourteen (14) out of seventy-two (72) procurement contracts were selected for procurement and suspension and debarment testing for the FTA program. A nonstatistical sample of four (4) out of (4) procurement contracts were selected for procurement and suspension and debarment testing for the CRISI program. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): Yes Southern California Regional Rail Authority Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs Year Ended June 30, 2022 Recommendation: We recommend SCRRA adhere to their procurement procedures requiring the suspension or debarment verification is performed prior to entering into a covered transaction. Views of Responsible Officials: Management Agrees. See separate corrective action plan.
Program Name: Federal Transit Cluster CFDA No.: 20.500/20.507/20.525 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Transportation Award No. and Year: Various Program Name: Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and Safety Improvements Program CFDA No.: 20.325 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Transportation Award No. and Year: Various Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Criteria: 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), Internal Controls, states that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Title 2 CFR Section 200.214 of the Uniform Guidance states that SCRRA must comply with 2 CFR part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The 2022 Compliance Supplement states: Non-Federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. ?Covered transactions? include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a passthrough entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. When a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) and available at https://www.sam.gov/SAM/, (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR section 180.300). Condition: During our testing of SCRRA?s provisions for procurement requirements for the FTA program, we noted six (6) of the fourteen (14) contracts selected for testing where there was no evidence that SCRRA verified the entity was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction, prior to entering the contract, in accordance with SCRRA?s policy. During our testing of SCRRA?s provisions for procurement requirements for the CRISI program, we noted four (4) of the four (4) contracts selected for testing where there was no evidence that SCRRA verified the entity was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction, prior to entering the contract, in accordance with SCRRA?s policy. Cause: SCRRA did not adhere to established policies and procedures to verify the information described in the condition prior to entering the transactions. Effect: SCRRA?s control was not consistently applied, which required verification of suspension or debarment prior to entering the contract. However, the verification of suspension and debarment was subsequently performed and documented by SCRRA. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of fourteen (14) out of seventy-two (72) procurement contracts were selected for procurement and suspension and debarment testing for the FTA program. A nonstatistical sample of four (4) out of (4) procurement contracts were selected for procurement and suspension and debarment testing for the CRISI program. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): Yes Southern California Regional Rail Authority Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs Year Ended June 30, 2022 Recommendation: We recommend SCRRA adhere to their procurement procedures requiring the suspension or debarment verification is performed prior to entering into a covered transaction. Views of Responsible Officials: Management Agrees. See separate corrective action plan.
Program Name: Federal Transit Cluster CFDA No.: 20.500/20.507/20.525 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Transportation Award No. and Year: Various Program Name: Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and Safety Improvements Program CFDA No.: 20.325 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Transportation Award No. and Year: Various Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Criteria: 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), Internal Controls, states that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Title 2 CFR Section 200.214 of the Uniform Guidance states that SCRRA must comply with 2 CFR part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The 2022 Compliance Supplement states: Non-Federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. ?Covered transactions? include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a passthrough entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. When a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) and available at https://www.sam.gov/SAM/, (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR section 180.300). Condition: During our testing of SCRRA?s provisions for procurement requirements for the FTA program, we noted six (6) of the fourteen (14) contracts selected for testing where there was no evidence that SCRRA verified the entity was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction, prior to entering the contract, in accordance with SCRRA?s policy. During our testing of SCRRA?s provisions for procurement requirements for the CRISI program, we noted four (4) of the four (4) contracts selected for testing where there was no evidence that SCRRA verified the entity was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction, prior to entering the contract, in accordance with SCRRA?s policy. Cause: SCRRA did not adhere to established policies and procedures to verify the information described in the condition prior to entering the transactions. Effect: SCRRA?s control was not consistently applied, which required verification of suspension or debarment prior to entering the contract. However, the verification of suspension and debarment was subsequently performed and documented by SCRRA. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of fourteen (14) out of seventy-two (72) procurement contracts were selected for procurement and suspension and debarment testing for the FTA program. A nonstatistical sample of four (4) out of (4) procurement contracts were selected for procurement and suspension and debarment testing for the CRISI program. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): Yes Southern California Regional Rail Authority Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs Year Ended June 30, 2022 Recommendation: We recommend SCRRA adhere to their procurement procedures requiring the suspension or debarment verification is performed prior to entering into a covered transaction. Views of Responsible Officials: Management Agrees. See separate corrective action plan.
Program Name: Federal Transit Cluster CFDA No.: 20.500/20.507/20.525 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Transportation Award No. and Year: Various Program Name: Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and Safety Improvements Program CFDA No.: 20.325 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Transportation Award No. and Year: Various Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Criteria: 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), Internal Controls, states that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Title 2 CFR Section 200.214 of the Uniform Guidance states that SCRRA must comply with 2 CFR part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The 2022 Compliance Supplement states: Non-Federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. ?Covered transactions? include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a passthrough entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. When a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) and available at https://www.sam.gov/SAM/, (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR section 180.300). Condition: During our testing of SCRRA?s provisions for procurement requirements for the FTA program, we noted six (6) of the fourteen (14) contracts selected for testing where there was no evidence that SCRRA verified the entity was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction, prior to entering the contract, in accordance with SCRRA?s policy. During our testing of SCRRA?s provisions for procurement requirements for the CRISI program, we noted four (4) of the four (4) contracts selected for testing where there was no evidence that SCRRA verified the entity was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction, prior to entering the contract, in accordance with SCRRA?s policy. Cause: SCRRA did not adhere to established policies and procedures to verify the information described in the condition prior to entering the transactions. Effect: SCRRA?s control was not consistently applied, which required verification of suspension or debarment prior to entering the contract. However, the verification of suspension and debarment was subsequently performed and documented by SCRRA. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of fourteen (14) out of seventy-two (72) procurement contracts were selected for procurement and suspension and debarment testing for the FTA program. A nonstatistical sample of four (4) out of (4) procurement contracts were selected for procurement and suspension and debarment testing for the CRISI program. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): Yes Southern California Regional Rail Authority Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs Year Ended June 30, 2022 Recommendation: We recommend SCRRA adhere to their procurement procedures requiring the suspension or debarment verification is performed prior to entering into a covered transaction. Views of Responsible Officials: Management Agrees. See separate corrective action plan.