Review And Approval Of The Schedule Of Expenditures Of Federal Awards (SEFA) - Significant Deficiency All Federal Programs Criteria: The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303 requires that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e. auditee management) establish and maintain internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. The School should have a process in place to perform a review of the SEFA, to include evidence of the resolution of variances, as well as a process to document the overall review and approval to ensure proper presentation, completeness, and accuracy of the SEFA. Condition: During the course of the audit, the engagement team identified multiple instances where the SEFA was not accurately prepared and presented. Specifically, there were federal expenditures that were misclassified to the incorrect federal grant. The SEFA was corrected to correctly classify these expenses in the current year. The engagement team identified this as a pervasive deficiency impacting all schools, as the SEFA was prepared by the same management personnel. Cause: The entity does not have an appropriate process in place to review the SEFA, to include retaining evidence of the resolution of variances, as well as documentation of the overall review and approval. Effect: Potential misstatement could occur if expenditure amounts are not accurately presented on the SEFA. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context: Not applicable. Identification As A Repeat Finding: Yes. Recommendation: The School should develop a consistent process to review the SEFA. Issues identified during the course of the review should be investigated and resolved in a timely manner.
FINDING 2022-001 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20/21, FY 21/22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation did not obtain an adequate number of price or rate quotations for three of the six vendors tested that were less than the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000, but exceeded the $10,000 micro-purchase threshold. The micro-purchase threshold may be increased, but the School Corporation did not provide documentation that the threshold had been increased. Documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, was not available for audit. Suspension and Debarment The School Corporation did not follow procedures to ensure that applicable vendors who received federal funds were not suspended or debarred from participation in federal awards programs. The School Corporation entered a contract with a vendor that exceeded $25,000, but they did not perform procedures to ensure compliance with requirements regarding verification that the vendor was not suspended or debarred from participation in federal programs before entering into the contract. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 14 EAST NOBLE SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320(b) (Uniform Guidance) states: "Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources." 2 CFR 200.320 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases? (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 15 EAST NOBLE SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 180.300 states in part: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not established a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20/21, FY 21/22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Material Weakness INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 16 EAST NOBLE SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not designed nor implemented at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement The School Corporation had not designed nor implemented a system of internal controls to ensure that the monthly claims for reimbursement were complete and accurately submitted. The monthly claims for reimbursement were prepared by the Director of Food Service without an oversight or review process in place to prevent, or detect and correct, errors. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause Management had not designed nor implemented a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Effect The failure to design and implement an effective internal control system could have enabled noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-001 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20/21, FY 21/22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation did not obtain an adequate number of price or rate quotations for three of the six vendors tested that were less than the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000, but exceeded the $10,000 micro-purchase threshold. The micro-purchase threshold may be increased, but the School Corporation did not provide documentation that the threshold had been increased. Documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, was not available for audit. Suspension and Debarment The School Corporation did not follow procedures to ensure that applicable vendors who received federal funds were not suspended or debarred from participation in federal awards programs. The School Corporation entered a contract with a vendor that exceeded $25,000, but they did not perform procedures to ensure compliance with requirements regarding verification that the vendor was not suspended or debarred from participation in federal programs before entering into the contract. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 14 EAST NOBLE SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320(b) (Uniform Guidance) states: "Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources." 2 CFR 200.320 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases? (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 15 EAST NOBLE SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 180.300 states in part: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not established a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20/21, FY 21/22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Material Weakness INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 16 EAST NOBLE SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not designed nor implemented at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement The School Corporation had not designed nor implemented a system of internal controls to ensure that the monthly claims for reimbursement were complete and accurately submitted. The monthly claims for reimbursement were prepared by the Director of Food Service without an oversight or review process in place to prevent, or detect and correct, errors. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause Management had not designed nor implemented a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Effect The failure to design and implement an effective internal control system could have enabled noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-001 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20/21, FY 21/22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation did not obtain an adequate number of price or rate quotations for three of the six vendors tested that were less than the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000, but exceeded the $10,000 micro-purchase threshold. The micro-purchase threshold may be increased, but the School Corporation did not provide documentation that the threshold had been increased. Documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, was not available for audit. Suspension and Debarment The School Corporation did not follow procedures to ensure that applicable vendors who received federal funds were not suspended or debarred from participation in federal awards programs. The School Corporation entered a contract with a vendor that exceeded $25,000, but they did not perform procedures to ensure compliance with requirements regarding verification that the vendor was not suspended or debarred from participation in federal programs before entering into the contract. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 14 EAST NOBLE SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320(b) (Uniform Guidance) states: "Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources." 2 CFR 200.320 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases? (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 15 EAST NOBLE SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 180.300 states in part: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not established a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20/21, FY 21/22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Material Weakness INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 16 EAST NOBLE SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not designed nor implemented at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement The School Corporation had not designed nor implemented a system of internal controls to ensure that the monthly claims for reimbursement were complete and accurately submitted. The monthly claims for reimbursement were prepared by the Director of Food Service without an oversight or review process in place to prevent, or detect and correct, errors. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause Management had not designed nor implemented a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Effect The failure to design and implement an effective internal control system could have enabled noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-001 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20/21, FY 21/22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation did not obtain an adequate number of price or rate quotations for three of the six vendors tested that were less than the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000, but exceeded the $10,000 micro-purchase threshold. The micro-purchase threshold may be increased, but the School Corporation did not provide documentation that the threshold had been increased. Documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, was not available for audit. Suspension and Debarment The School Corporation did not follow procedures to ensure that applicable vendors who received federal funds were not suspended or debarred from participation in federal awards programs. The School Corporation entered a contract with a vendor that exceeded $25,000, but they did not perform procedures to ensure compliance with requirements regarding verification that the vendor was not suspended or debarred from participation in federal programs before entering into the contract. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 14 EAST NOBLE SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320(b) (Uniform Guidance) states: "Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources." 2 CFR 200.320 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases? (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 15 EAST NOBLE SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 180.300 states in part: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not established a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20/21, FY 21/22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Material Weakness INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 16 EAST NOBLE SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not designed nor implemented at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement The School Corporation had not designed nor implemented a system of internal controls to ensure that the monthly claims for reimbursement were complete and accurately submitted. The monthly claims for reimbursement were prepared by the Director of Food Service without an oversight or review process in place to prevent, or detect and correct, errors. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause Management had not designed nor implemented a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Effect The failure to design and implement an effective internal control system could have enabled noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-001 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20/21, FY 21/22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation did not obtain an adequate number of price or rate quotations for three of the six vendors tested that were less than the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000, but exceeded the $10,000 micro-purchase threshold. The micro-purchase threshold may be increased, but the School Corporation did not provide documentation that the threshold had been increased. Documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, was not available for audit. Suspension and Debarment The School Corporation did not follow procedures to ensure that applicable vendors who received federal funds were not suspended or debarred from participation in federal awards programs. The School Corporation entered a contract with a vendor that exceeded $25,000, but they did not perform procedures to ensure compliance with requirements regarding verification that the vendor was not suspended or debarred from participation in federal programs before entering into the contract. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 14 EAST NOBLE SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320(b) (Uniform Guidance) states: "Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources." 2 CFR 200.320 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases? (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 15 EAST NOBLE SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 180.300 states in part: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not established a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20/21, FY 21/22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Material Weakness INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 16 EAST NOBLE SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not designed nor implemented at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement The School Corporation had not designed nor implemented a system of internal controls to ensure that the monthly claims for reimbursement were complete and accurately submitted. The monthly claims for reimbursement were prepared by the Director of Food Service without an oversight or review process in place to prevent, or detect and correct, errors. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause Management had not designed nor implemented a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Effect The failure to design and implement an effective internal control system could have enabled noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-001 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20/21, FY 21/22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation did not obtain an adequate number of price or rate quotations for three of the six vendors tested that were less than the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000, but exceeded the $10,000 micro-purchase threshold. The micro-purchase threshold may be increased, but the School Corporation did not provide documentation that the threshold had been increased. Documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, was not available for audit. Suspension and Debarment The School Corporation did not follow procedures to ensure that applicable vendors who received federal funds were not suspended or debarred from participation in federal awards programs. The School Corporation entered a contract with a vendor that exceeded $25,000, but they did not perform procedures to ensure compliance with requirements regarding verification that the vendor was not suspended or debarred from participation in federal programs before entering into the contract. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 14 EAST NOBLE SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320(b) (Uniform Guidance) states: "Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources." 2 CFR 200.320 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases? (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 15 EAST NOBLE SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 180.300 states in part: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not established a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20/21, FY 21/22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Material Weakness INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 16 EAST NOBLE SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not designed nor implemented at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement The School Corporation had not designed nor implemented a system of internal controls to ensure that the monthly claims for reimbursement were complete and accurately submitted. The monthly claims for reimbursement were prepared by the Director of Food Service without an oversight or review process in place to prevent, or detect and correct, errors. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause Management had not designed nor implemented a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Effect The failure to design and implement an effective internal control system could have enabled noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-001 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20/21, FY 21/22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation did not obtain an adequate number of price or rate quotations for three of the six vendors tested that were less than the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000, but exceeded the $10,000 micro-purchase threshold. The micro-purchase threshold may be increased, but the School Corporation did not provide documentation that the threshold had been increased. Documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, was not available for audit. Suspension and Debarment The School Corporation did not follow procedures to ensure that applicable vendors who received federal funds were not suspended or debarred from participation in federal awards programs. The School Corporation entered a contract with a vendor that exceeded $25,000, but they did not perform procedures to ensure compliance with requirements regarding verification that the vendor was not suspended or debarred from participation in federal programs before entering into the contract. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 14 EAST NOBLE SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320(b) (Uniform Guidance) states: "Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources." 2 CFR 200.320 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases? (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 15 EAST NOBLE SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 180.300 states in part: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not established a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20/21, FY 21/22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Material Weakness INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 16 EAST NOBLE SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not designed nor implemented at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement The School Corporation had not designed nor implemented a system of internal controls to ensure that the monthly claims for reimbursement were complete and accurately submitted. The monthly claims for reimbursement were prepared by the Director of Food Service without an oversight or review process in place to prevent, or detect and correct, errors. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause Management had not designed nor implemented a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Effect The failure to design and implement an effective internal control system could have enabled noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-003 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States Assistance Listings Number: 84.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 20611-042-PN01, 21611-042-PN01, 22611-042-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness; Other Matters Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the suspension and debarment requirements of the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. The School Corporation did not follow procedures to ensure that applicable vendors who received federal funds were not suspended or debarred from participation in federal awards programs. The School Corporation entered into a contract that exceeded $25,000 for speech and language therapy services. The School Corporation did not perform procedures to ensure compliance with requirements regarding verification that the vendor was not suspended or debarred from participation in federal programs before entering into the contract. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 EAST NOBLE SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Cause Management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-003 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States Assistance Listings Number: 84.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 20611-042-PN01, 21611-042-PN01, 22611-042-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness; Other Matters Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the suspension and debarment requirements of the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. The School Corporation did not follow procedures to ensure that applicable vendors who received federal funds were not suspended or debarred from participation in federal awards programs. The School Corporation entered into a contract that exceeded $25,000 for speech and language therapy services. The School Corporation did not perform procedures to ensure compliance with requirements regarding verification that the vendor was not suspended or debarred from participation in federal programs before entering into the contract. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 EAST NOBLE SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Cause Management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Subject: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - Eligibility; Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Assistance Listings Number: 84.010 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S010A190014, S010A200014, S010A210014 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Eligibility; Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Finding: Material Weakness Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not designed nor implemented at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Eligibility and the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirements. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 EAST NOBLE SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Eligibility Eligibility for the program was determined on the Eligible School Summary of the Title I application. The Indiana Department of Education prepopulated the School Corporation's enrollment and poverty numbers based upon Real Time Data (RT) reports that were updated by the School Corporation and the Pupil Enrollment Summary Report. Data in the RT reports originated from the Applications for Free and Reduced Priced Meals. At the beginning of each year, an individual entered the poverty guidelines into the software the School Corporation used to determine eligibility. The same individual who entered the parameters also performed the final authorization of the system's determination, automatically sending the information into the database that populated the RT reports. Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking There was no oversight or review process at the School Corporation level over the methodology of allocating funds to the individual schools within the School Corporation to ensure that it was consistently applied throughout the audit period. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause Management had not designed nor implemented a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Eligibility and the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirements. Effect The failure to design and implement an effective internal control system could have enabled noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Eligibility and the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirements. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 EAST NOBLE SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Eligibility and the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Subject: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - Eligibility; Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Assistance Listings Number: 84.010 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S010A190014, S010A200014, S010A210014 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Eligibility; Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Finding: Material Weakness Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not designed nor implemented at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Eligibility and the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirements. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 EAST NOBLE SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Eligibility Eligibility for the program was determined on the Eligible School Summary of the Title I application. The Indiana Department of Education prepopulated the School Corporation's enrollment and poverty numbers based upon Real Time Data (RT) reports that were updated by the School Corporation and the Pupil Enrollment Summary Report. Data in the RT reports originated from the Applications for Free and Reduced Priced Meals. At the beginning of each year, an individual entered the poverty guidelines into the software the School Corporation used to determine eligibility. The same individual who entered the parameters also performed the final authorization of the system's determination, automatically sending the information into the database that populated the RT reports. Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking There was no oversight or review process at the School Corporation level over the methodology of allocating funds to the individual schools within the School Corporation to ensure that it was consistently applied throughout the audit period. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause Management had not designed nor implemented a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Eligibility and the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirements. Effect The failure to design and implement an effective internal control system could have enabled noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Eligibility and the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirements. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 EAST NOBLE SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Eligibility and the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-005 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D200013, S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Material Weakness Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not designed nor implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. The School Corporation had not designed nor implemented a system of internal controls to ensure that the four Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) annual data reports (Reports) were complete and accurately submitted. The Reports were prepared by one employee without an oversight or review process in place to prevent, or detect and correct, errors. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause Management had not developed nor implemented a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 EAST NOBLE SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-005 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D200013, S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Material Weakness Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not designed nor implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. The School Corporation had not designed nor implemented a system of internal controls to ensure that the four Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) annual data reports (Reports) were complete and accurately submitted. The Reports were prepared by one employee without an oversight or review process in place to prevent, or detect and correct, errors. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause Management had not developed nor implemented a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 EAST NOBLE SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-005 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D200013, S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Material Weakness Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not designed nor implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. The School Corporation had not designed nor implemented a system of internal controls to ensure that the four Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) annual data reports (Reports) were complete and accurately submitted. The Reports were prepared by one employee without an oversight or review process in place to prevent, or detect and correct, errors. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause Management had not developed nor implemented a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 EAST NOBLE SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-005 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D200013, S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Material Weakness Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not designed nor implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. The School Corporation had not designed nor implemented a system of internal controls to ensure that the four Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) annual data reports (Reports) were complete and accurately submitted. The Reports were prepared by one employee without an oversight or review process in place to prevent, or detect and correct, errors. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause Management had not developed nor implemented a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 EAST NOBLE SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-005 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D200013, S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Material Weakness Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not designed nor implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. The School Corporation had not designed nor implemented a system of internal controls to ensure that the four Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) annual data reports (Reports) were complete and accurately submitted. The Reports were prepared by one employee without an oversight or review process in place to prevent, or detect and correct, errors. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause Management had not developed nor implemented a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 EAST NOBLE SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Finding No. 2022-001 Federal Program: Federal Assistance Listing #93.498 US Department of Health and Human Services Provider Relief Fund Activities Allowed/Allowable Costs Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance Reporting Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal award. Condition: The Agency selected option I to calculate lost revenue, which consists of a comparison of actual results during the period of availability to the base calendar year of 2019. For all periods reported in the Agency?s Period 2 submission, the reported patient service revenue amounts were not reduced by bad debts, as required by the terms and conditions of the federal award. Cause: The Agency did not have an effective internal control process in place to ensure review and approval of the lost revenue calculation claimed under the federal program and the report submitted for Period 2 was accurate and in accordance with the terms and conditions of the federal award. Effect: The reporting to HHS for Period 2 was considered incorrect. The Agency did not properly report patient service revenue, as gross patient revenue was not reduced by bad debt expense. The impact of the bad debts would have been to increase lost revenue by $48,639. Questioned Costs: None. Had the Agency properly reduced patient service revenue by bad debts for the periods reported, lost revenue would have been $1,665,089 compared to the $1,616,450 reported. Context: Key line items were tested on the Period 2 HHS report. Recommendation: We recommend the Agency enhance its existing internal control processes to ensure the lost revenue calculation claimed meets the requirements of the federal program and to correct the lost revenue calculation in future required reports. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the noted finding. However, had the Agency reported the correct lost revenue figures, the Agency satisfactorily incurred eligible expenses and lost revenue in excess of funding expended. Management will continue to refine processes to more diligently review the lost revenue calculation to ensure such amounts are in accordance with the terms and conditions of the federal award.
Review And Approval Of The Schedule Of Expenditures Of Federal Awards (SEFA) - Significant Deficiency All Federal Programs Criteria: The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303 requires that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e. auditee management) establish and maintain internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. The School should have a process in place to perform a review of the SEFA, to include evidence of the resolution of variances, as well as a process to document the overall review and approval to ensure proper presentation, completeness, and accuracy of the SEFA. Condition: During the course of the audit, the engagement team identified multiple instances where the SEFA was not accurately prepared and presented. Specifically, there were federal expenditures that were misclassified to the incorrect federal grant. The SEFA was corrected to correctly classify these expenses in the current year. The engagement team identified this as a pervasive deficiency impacting all schools, as the SEFA was prepared by the same management personnel. Cause: The entity does not have an appropriate process in place to review the SEFA, to include retaining evidence of the resolution of variances, as well as documentation of the overall review and approval. Effect: Potential misstatement could occur if expenditure amounts are not accurately presented on the SEFA. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context: Not applicable. Identification As A Repeat Finding: Yes. Recommendation: The School should develop a consistent process to review the SEFA. Issues identified during the course of the review should be investigated and resolved in a timely manner.
Review And Approval Of The Schedule Of Expenditures Of Federal Awards (SEFA) - Significant Deficiency All Federal Programs Criteria: The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303 requires that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e. auditee management) establish and maintain internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. The School should have a process in place to perform a review of the SEFA, to include evidence of the resolution of variances, as well as a process to document the overall review and approval to ensure proper presentation, completeness, and accuracy of the SEFA. Condition: During the course of the audit, the engagement team identified multiple instances where the SEFA was not accurately prepared and presented. Specifically, there were federal expenditures that were misclassified to the incorrect federal grant. The SEFA was corrected to correctly classify these expenses in the current year. The engagement team identified this as a pervasive deficiency impacting all schools, as the SEFA was prepared by the same management personnel. Cause: The entity does not have an appropriate process in place to review the SEFA, to include retaining evidence of the resolution of variances, as well as documentation of the overall review and approval. Effect: Potential misstatement could occur if expenditure amounts are not accurately presented on the SEFA. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context: Not applicable. Identification As A Repeat Finding: Yes. Recommendation: The School should develop a consistent process to review the SEFA. Issues identified during the course of the review should be investigated and resolved in a timely manner.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.555 and 10.559 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A Pass through Agency: Arizona Department of Education Pass Through Number: 7AZ300AZ3 Award Period: July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Financial Reporting Criteria: 2 CFR Part 200.303 Internal Controls requires that the District implement internal controls designed to ensure compliance with cash management requirements. Condition: The District did not maintain documentation to support proper review and approval of the monthly meal reimbursement claims. Context: For twelve of twelve monthly meal reimbursement claims tested, the District did not maintain documentation to support proper review and approval of the monthly meal reimbursement claims. Cause: Lack of management oversight. Effect: Internal control weakness as errors could go undetected. Repeat Finding: This finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2021-004. Recommendation: In order to strengthen internal controls over compliance, an individual independent of the preparation of the monthly meal reimbursement claims should review the claims for accuracy and reasonableness and documentation should be maintained to support that the review was performed. View of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.555 and 10.559 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A Pass through Agency: Arizona Department of Education Pass Through Number: 7AZ300AZ3 Award Period: July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Financial Reporting Criteria: 2 CFR Part 200.303 Internal Controls requires that the District implement internal controls designed to ensure compliance with cash management requirements. Condition: The District did not maintain documentation to support proper review and approval of the monthly meal reimbursement claims. Context: For twelve of twelve monthly meal reimbursement claims tested, the District did not maintain documentation to support proper review and approval of the monthly meal reimbursement claims. Cause: Lack of management oversight. Effect: Internal control weakness as errors could go undetected. Repeat Finding: This finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2021-004. Recommendation: In order to strengthen internal controls over compliance, an individual independent of the preparation of the monthly meal reimbursement claims should review the claims for accuracy and reasonableness and documentation should be maintained to support that the review was performed. View of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.555 and 10.559 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A Pass through Agency: Arizona Department of Education Pass Through Number: 7AZ300AZ3 Award Period: July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Financial Reporting Criteria: 2 CFR Part 200.303 Internal Controls requires that the District implement internal controls designed to ensure compliance with cash management requirements. Condition: The District did not maintain documentation to support proper review and approval of the monthly meal reimbursement claims. Context: For twelve of twelve monthly meal reimbursement claims tested, the District did not maintain documentation to support proper review and approval of the monthly meal reimbursement claims. Cause: Lack of management oversight. Effect: Internal control weakness as errors could go undetected. Repeat Finding: This finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2021-004. Recommendation: In order to strengthen internal controls over compliance, an individual independent of the preparation of the monthly meal reimbursement claims should review the claims for accuracy and reasonableness and documentation should be maintained to support that the review was performed. View of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
FA 2022-001 Strengthen Controls over Expenditures Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Internal Control Impact: Significant Deficiency Compliance Impact: Nonmaterial Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education AL Number and Title: COVID-19 ? 84.425D ? Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund Federal Award Number: S425D200012 (Year: 2020) Questioned Costs: $129,375 Description: The policies and procedures of the School District were insufficient to provide adequate internal controls over expenditures as it relates to the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund program. Background: On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act was signed into law. The CARES Act was designed to mitigate the economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic in a variety of ways, including providing additional funding for local educational agencies (LEAs) navigating the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak. Provisions included in Title VIII of the CARES Act created the Education Stabilization Fund to provide financial resources to educational entities to prevent, prepare for, and respond to coronavirus. The CARES Act allocated $30.75 billion, the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act allocated an additional $81.9 billion, and the American Rescue Plan Act added $165.1 billion in funding to the Education Stabilization Fund. Multiple Education Stabilization Fund subprograms were created and allotted funding through the various COVID-19-related legislation. Of these programs, the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund was created to address the impact that COVID-19 has had, and continues to have, on elementary and secondary schools across the nation. ESSER funding was granted to the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) by the U.S. Department of Education (ED). GaDOE is responsible for distributing funds to LEAs and overseeing the expenditure of funds by LEAs. ESSER funds totaling $16,263,786.14 were expended and reported on the Whitfield County Board of Education?s Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for fiscal year 2022. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the School District is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 ? Internal Controls. Provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.403 ? Factors Affecting Allowability of Costs state that ?costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles, (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items, (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity? (g) Be adequately documented?? In addition, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.404 ? Reasonable Costs state that ?a cost is reasonable if, in its nature and amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person under the circumstances prevailing at the time the decision was made to incur the cost. The question of reasonableness is particularly important when the non-Federal entity is predominantly federally-funded. In determining reasonableness of a given cost, consideration must be given to: (a) Whether the cost is of a type generally recognized as ordinary and necessary for the operation of the non-Federal entity or the proper and efficient performance of the Federal award. (b) The restraints or requirements imposed by such factors as: sound business practices; arm?s-length bargaining; Federal, state, local, tribal, and other laws and regulations; and terms and conditions of the Federal award? (d) Whether the individuals concerned acted with prudence in the circumstances considering their responsibilities to the non-Federal entity, its employees, where applicable its students or membership, the public at large, and the Federal Government. (e) Whether the non-Federal entity significantly deviates from its established practices and policies regarding the incurrence of costs, which may unjustifiably increase the Federal award?s cost.? Furthermore, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.318 ? General Procurement Standards state that ?the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations? for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward?? Condition: Auditors performed a review of expenditure activity associated with the ESSER program to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented and applicable compliance requirements were met. This testing revealed that a payment was made to the staffing company utilized by the School District to provide ?retention? bonuses to both transportation and school nutrition contractors who were not employees of the School District. These individuals were assigned to work within the School District by the private staffing company. Per review of the contract in place during the fiscal year under review, it was noted that these bonuses represented amounts in excess of the agreed upon price. Furthermore, the School District does not have the authority or ability to retain these individuals as they were not employees of the School District and contract provisions requiring the individuals to remain employed by the private staffing company and in the service of the School District for a stated period of time was not reflected within the associated contract. Therefore, expenditures totaling $129,375 were not considered to be reasonable and necessary for the performance of the ESSER program and deemed unallowable. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $129,375 were identified for expenditures that were not incurred for a necessary and reasonable purpose and did not follow the School District?s policies and procedures. These known questioned costs related to expenditures that were not tested as part of a sample, and therefore, should not be projected to a population to determine likely questioned costs. Cause: Per discussion with management, the School District believed that the expenditures were allowable as the expenditures were approved by GaDOE through the Consolidated Application process; however, they were not aware that contract amendments should be initiated prior to the expenditure of funds in this manner. Effect or Potential Effect: The School District is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance, ED, or GaDOE guidance related to the ESSER program. Failure to ensure that appropriate policies and procedures are followed when expending federal funds may expose the School District to unnecessary financial strains and shortages as GaDOE may require the School District to return funds associated with unallowable expenditures. Recommendation: The School District should review current internal control procedures related to ESSER program expenditures. Where vulnerable, the School District should develop and/or modify its policies and procedures to ensure that expenditures are in line with provisions reflected within the associated contract and/or contract amendments. In addition, the School District should implement a monitoring process to ensure that all expenditures are compliant with the School District?s purchasing policies and procedures. Views of Responsible Officials: We do not concur with this finding. The Whitfield County School District followed standard operating procedures for all federal programs? budget approval and disbursement requests with the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE). The finding was issued after GaDOE approved and paid our requested expenses. Auditor?s Concluding Remarks: School District personnel state that the School District ?followed standard operating procedures for all federal programs? budget approval and disbursement requests with the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE).? Though GaDOE approved a budget that included the bonuses, the School District was still expected and required to comply with federal regulations associated with the federal program. When each federal program budget is submitted to GaDOE, School District management signs assurances certifying that ?each program will be administered in accordance with all applicable statutes, regulations, program plans, and applications? and that the School District will ?maintain adequate internal controls in the procurement process for goods and services in accordance with Georgia?s Financial Management for Georgia LUAS Manual.? As noted previously, the School District did not follow appropriate procurement policies and procedures and paid amounts beyond those allowed per the contract in place during the fiscal year under review. Additionally, auditors contacted ED?s ESSER program management to discuss the allowability of these bonus payments as ED is the grantor of the funds and the cognizant agency charged with administering the ESSER program. Officials at ED advised auditors that bonuses may be allowable if such bonuses are reflected within the contract; however, as noted previously, no such contract provisions were present. Moreover, ED emphasized that published guidance associated with the issuance of bonuses or premium pay from ESSER funds pertained to school personnel, not contractors. We reaffirm our finding and will review the status of the finding during our next audit.
FA 2022-001 Strengthen Controls over Expenditures Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Internal Control Impact: Significant Deficiency Compliance Impact: Nonmaterial Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education AL Number and Title: COVID-19 ? 84.425D ? Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund Federal Award Number: S425D200012 (Year: 2020) Questioned Costs: $129,375 Description: The policies and procedures of the School District were insufficient to provide adequate internal controls over expenditures as it relates to the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund program. Background: On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act was signed into law. The CARES Act was designed to mitigate the economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic in a variety of ways, including providing additional funding for local educational agencies (LEAs) navigating the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak. Provisions included in Title VIII of the CARES Act created the Education Stabilization Fund to provide financial resources to educational entities to prevent, prepare for, and respond to coronavirus. The CARES Act allocated $30.75 billion, the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act allocated an additional $81.9 billion, and the American Rescue Plan Act added $165.1 billion in funding to the Education Stabilization Fund. Multiple Education Stabilization Fund subprograms were created and allotted funding through the various COVID-19-related legislation. Of these programs, the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund was created to address the impact that COVID-19 has had, and continues to have, on elementary and secondary schools across the nation. ESSER funding was granted to the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) by the U.S. Department of Education (ED). GaDOE is responsible for distributing funds to LEAs and overseeing the expenditure of funds by LEAs. ESSER funds totaling $16,263,786.14 were expended and reported on the Whitfield County Board of Education?s Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for fiscal year 2022. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the School District is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 ? Internal Controls. Provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.403 ? Factors Affecting Allowability of Costs state that ?costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles, (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items, (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity? (g) Be adequately documented?? In addition, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.404 ? Reasonable Costs state that ?a cost is reasonable if, in its nature and amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person under the circumstances prevailing at the time the decision was made to incur the cost. The question of reasonableness is particularly important when the non-Federal entity is predominantly federally-funded. In determining reasonableness of a given cost, consideration must be given to: (a) Whether the cost is of a type generally recognized as ordinary and necessary for the operation of the non-Federal entity or the proper and efficient performance of the Federal award. (b) The restraints or requirements imposed by such factors as: sound business practices; arm?s-length bargaining; Federal, state, local, tribal, and other laws and regulations; and terms and conditions of the Federal award? (d) Whether the individuals concerned acted with prudence in the circumstances considering their responsibilities to the non-Federal entity, its employees, where applicable its students or membership, the public at large, and the Federal Government. (e) Whether the non-Federal entity significantly deviates from its established practices and policies regarding the incurrence of costs, which may unjustifiably increase the Federal award?s cost.? Furthermore, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.318 ? General Procurement Standards state that ?the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations? for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward?? Condition: Auditors performed a review of expenditure activity associated with the ESSER program to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented and applicable compliance requirements were met. This testing revealed that a payment was made to the staffing company utilized by the School District to provide ?retention? bonuses to both transportation and school nutrition contractors who were not employees of the School District. These individuals were assigned to work within the School District by the private staffing company. Per review of the contract in place during the fiscal year under review, it was noted that these bonuses represented amounts in excess of the agreed upon price. Furthermore, the School District does not have the authority or ability to retain these individuals as they were not employees of the School District and contract provisions requiring the individuals to remain employed by the private staffing company and in the service of the School District for a stated period of time was not reflected within the associated contract. Therefore, expenditures totaling $129,375 were not considered to be reasonable and necessary for the performance of the ESSER program and deemed unallowable. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $129,375 were identified for expenditures that were not incurred for a necessary and reasonable purpose and did not follow the School District?s policies and procedures. These known questioned costs related to expenditures that were not tested as part of a sample, and therefore, should not be projected to a population to determine likely questioned costs. Cause: Per discussion with management, the School District believed that the expenditures were allowable as the expenditures were approved by GaDOE through the Consolidated Application process; however, they were not aware that contract amendments should be initiated prior to the expenditure of funds in this manner. Effect or Potential Effect: The School District is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance, ED, or GaDOE guidance related to the ESSER program. Failure to ensure that appropriate policies and procedures are followed when expending federal funds may expose the School District to unnecessary financial strains and shortages as GaDOE may require the School District to return funds associated with unallowable expenditures. Recommendation: The School District should review current internal control procedures related to ESSER program expenditures. Where vulnerable, the School District should develop and/or modify its policies and procedures to ensure that expenditures are in line with provisions reflected within the associated contract and/or contract amendments. In addition, the School District should implement a monitoring process to ensure that all expenditures are compliant with the School District?s purchasing policies and procedures. Views of Responsible Officials: We do not concur with this finding. The Whitfield County School District followed standard operating procedures for all federal programs? budget approval and disbursement requests with the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE). The finding was issued after GaDOE approved and paid our requested expenses. Auditor?s Concluding Remarks: School District personnel state that the School District ?followed standard operating procedures for all federal programs? budget approval and disbursement requests with the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE).? Though GaDOE approved a budget that included the bonuses, the School District was still expected and required to comply with federal regulations associated with the federal program. When each federal program budget is submitted to GaDOE, School District management signs assurances certifying that ?each program will be administered in accordance with all applicable statutes, regulations, program plans, and applications? and that the School District will ?maintain adequate internal controls in the procurement process for goods and services in accordance with Georgia?s Financial Management for Georgia LUAS Manual.? As noted previously, the School District did not follow appropriate procurement policies and procedures and paid amounts beyond those allowed per the contract in place during the fiscal year under review. Additionally, auditors contacted ED?s ESSER program management to discuss the allowability of these bonus payments as ED is the grantor of the funds and the cognizant agency charged with administering the ESSER program. Officials at ED advised auditors that bonuses may be allowable if such bonuses are reflected within the contract; however, as noted previously, no such contract provisions were present. Moreover, ED emphasized that published guidance associated with the issuance of bonuses or premium pay from ESSER funds pertained to school personnel, not contractors. We reaffirm our finding and will review the status of the finding during our next audit.
FA 2022-001 Strengthen Controls over Expenditures Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Internal Control Impact: Significant Deficiency Compliance Impact: Nonmaterial Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education AL Number and Title: COVID-19 ? 84.425D ? Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund Federal Award Number: S425D200012 (Year: 2020) Questioned Costs: $129,375 Description: The policies and procedures of the School District were insufficient to provide adequate internal controls over expenditures as it relates to the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund program. Background: On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act was signed into law. The CARES Act was designed to mitigate the economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic in a variety of ways, including providing additional funding for local educational agencies (LEAs) navigating the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak. Provisions included in Title VIII of the CARES Act created the Education Stabilization Fund to provide financial resources to educational entities to prevent, prepare for, and respond to coronavirus. The CARES Act allocated $30.75 billion, the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act allocated an additional $81.9 billion, and the American Rescue Plan Act added $165.1 billion in funding to the Education Stabilization Fund. Multiple Education Stabilization Fund subprograms were created and allotted funding through the various COVID-19-related legislation. Of these programs, the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund was created to address the impact that COVID-19 has had, and continues to have, on elementary and secondary schools across the nation. ESSER funding was granted to the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) by the U.S. Department of Education (ED). GaDOE is responsible for distributing funds to LEAs and overseeing the expenditure of funds by LEAs. ESSER funds totaling $16,263,786.14 were expended and reported on the Whitfield County Board of Education?s Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for fiscal year 2022. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the School District is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 ? Internal Controls. Provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.403 ? Factors Affecting Allowability of Costs state that ?costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles, (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items, (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity? (g) Be adequately documented?? In addition, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.404 ? Reasonable Costs state that ?a cost is reasonable if, in its nature and amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person under the circumstances prevailing at the time the decision was made to incur the cost. The question of reasonableness is particularly important when the non-Federal entity is predominantly federally-funded. In determining reasonableness of a given cost, consideration must be given to: (a) Whether the cost is of a type generally recognized as ordinary and necessary for the operation of the non-Federal entity or the proper and efficient performance of the Federal award. (b) The restraints or requirements imposed by such factors as: sound business practices; arm?s-length bargaining; Federal, state, local, tribal, and other laws and regulations; and terms and conditions of the Federal award? (d) Whether the individuals concerned acted with prudence in the circumstances considering their responsibilities to the non-Federal entity, its employees, where applicable its students or membership, the public at large, and the Federal Government. (e) Whether the non-Federal entity significantly deviates from its established practices and policies regarding the incurrence of costs, which may unjustifiably increase the Federal award?s cost.? Furthermore, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.318 ? General Procurement Standards state that ?the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations? for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward?? Condition: Auditors performed a review of expenditure activity associated with the ESSER program to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented and applicable compliance requirements were met. This testing revealed that a payment was made to the staffing company utilized by the School District to provide ?retention? bonuses to both transportation and school nutrition contractors who were not employees of the School District. These individuals were assigned to work within the School District by the private staffing company. Per review of the contract in place during the fiscal year under review, it was noted that these bonuses represented amounts in excess of the agreed upon price. Furthermore, the School District does not have the authority or ability to retain these individuals as they were not employees of the School District and contract provisions requiring the individuals to remain employed by the private staffing company and in the service of the School District for a stated period of time was not reflected within the associated contract. Therefore, expenditures totaling $129,375 were not considered to be reasonable and necessary for the performance of the ESSER program and deemed unallowable. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $129,375 were identified for expenditures that were not incurred for a necessary and reasonable purpose and did not follow the School District?s policies and procedures. These known questioned costs related to expenditures that were not tested as part of a sample, and therefore, should not be projected to a population to determine likely questioned costs. Cause: Per discussion with management, the School District believed that the expenditures were allowable as the expenditures were approved by GaDOE through the Consolidated Application process; however, they were not aware that contract amendments should be initiated prior to the expenditure of funds in this manner. Effect or Potential Effect: The School District is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance, ED, or GaDOE guidance related to the ESSER program. Failure to ensure that appropriate policies and procedures are followed when expending federal funds may expose the School District to unnecessary financial strains and shortages as GaDOE may require the School District to return funds associated with unallowable expenditures. Recommendation: The School District should review current internal control procedures related to ESSER program expenditures. Where vulnerable, the School District should develop and/or modify its policies and procedures to ensure that expenditures are in line with provisions reflected within the associated contract and/or contract amendments. In addition, the School District should implement a monitoring process to ensure that all expenditures are compliant with the School District?s purchasing policies and procedures. Views of Responsible Officials: We do not concur with this finding. The Whitfield County School District followed standard operating procedures for all federal programs? budget approval and disbursement requests with the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE). The finding was issued after GaDOE approved and paid our requested expenses. Auditor?s Concluding Remarks: School District personnel state that the School District ?followed standard operating procedures for all federal programs? budget approval and disbursement requests with the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE).? Though GaDOE approved a budget that included the bonuses, the School District was still expected and required to comply with federal regulations associated with the federal program. When each federal program budget is submitted to GaDOE, School District management signs assurances certifying that ?each program will be administered in accordance with all applicable statutes, regulations, program plans, and applications? and that the School District will ?maintain adequate internal controls in the procurement process for goods and services in accordance with Georgia?s Financial Management for Georgia LUAS Manual.? As noted previously, the School District did not follow appropriate procurement policies and procedures and paid amounts beyond those allowed per the contract in place during the fiscal year under review. Additionally, auditors contacted ED?s ESSER program management to discuss the allowability of these bonus payments as ED is the grantor of the funds and the cognizant agency charged with administering the ESSER program. Officials at ED advised auditors that bonuses may be allowable if such bonuses are reflected within the contract; however, as noted previously, no such contract provisions were present. Moreover, ED emphasized that published guidance associated with the issuance of bonuses or premium pay from ESSER funds pertained to school personnel, not contractors. We reaffirm our finding and will review the status of the finding during our next audit.
?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? CONDITION We identified Coronavirus Relief Fund (CRF) quarterly financial progress reports were incomplete, inaccurate and did not reconcile to the state's accounting system. CRITERIA Federal regulation, 2 CFR 200.303, requires non-Federal entities, in part, to establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Office of Management and Budget, 2 CFR Part 200, Appendix XI, 2021 and 2022 Compliance Supplements, for Assistance Listing 21.019 Coronavirus Relief Fund, states in part: Each prime recipient of the Fund shall provide a quarterly Financial Progress Report that contains COVID-19 related costs incurred during the covered period (the period beginning on March 1, 2020; and ending on December 31, 2021) to Treasury OIG. Each prime recipient shall report this quarterly information mentioned above into the Grant Solutions portal. The prime recipient?s quarterly Financial Progress Report submissions should be supported by the data in the prime recipient?s accounting system. Key Line Items ? The following line items from the reporting contain critical information: (1) The total amount of payments from the Fund received from Treasury. (2) The amount of funds received that were expended or obligated for each project or activity. (3) A detailed list of all projects or activities for which funds were expended or obligated, including: a. The name of the project or activity b. A description of the project or activity (4) Detailed information on any loans issued; contracts and grants awarded; transfers made to other government entities; and direct payments made by the prime recipient that are greater than $50,000. For amounts less than $50,000, the prime recipient must report in the aggregate for these expenditure categories. For direct payments to individuals, aggregate reporting is required to be reported regardless of amount. Beginning September 21, 2020, prime recipients were required to submit via the Grant Solutions portal the first detailed quarterly Financial Progress Report, which cover the period March 1 through June 30, 2020 (with exception to the September 21 first quarter deadline and the October 13 second quarter reporting deadlines for those prime recipients using Grant Solutions? upload feature, which was available December 1, 2020). Thereafter, quarterly reporting will be due no later than ten days after each calendar quarter. If the 10th calendar day falls on a weekend or a Federal holiday, the due date will be the next working day. Reporting shall end with either the calendar quarter after the COVID-19 related costs and expenditures have been liquidated and paid or the calendar quarter ending September 30, 2022, whichever comes first. The prime recipient?s quarterly Financial Progress Report submission should be supported by the data in the prime recipient?s accounting system. Department of the Treasury Office of Inspector General Coronavirus Relief Frequently Asked Questions Related to Reporting and Recordkeeping (OIG-CA-20-028R), if an error is identified or a modification needs to be made after a report is already approved by the Treasury OIG, the prime recipient will need to make the modification or correction in the next quarterly reporting cycle. CAUSE There was a lack of understanding across state agencies of the detailed requirements of Coronavirus Relief Fund reporting. The North Dakota Office of Management and Budget (OMB) provided the CRF Report Template, Data Upload Service Data Dictionary, Coronavirus Relief Fund Frequently Asked Questions, and instructions to all state agencies. However, OMB?s procedures to review the information submitted by state agencies did not detect all material errors and omissions within the reporting cycle. In addition, the short turnaround time for reporting deadlines contributed to reporting errors and omissions. EFFECT Inaccurate Federal reporting reduces transparency and may impair the Federal oversight agency's ability to properly oversee the program. CONTEXT State agencies prepared and submitted CRF report templates to the ND Office of Management and Budget (OMB). OMB compiled the information into a master CRF report template for submission. We randomly selected the quarters ending December 30, 2020, and December 31, 2021, to test across 11 state agencies. One agency did not have expenditures in the quarter ending December 31, 2021; therefore, we judgmentally selected the quarter ending March 31, 2021, to test. Another agency did not have expenditures in either of the quarters randomly selected; therefore, we judgmentally selected the quarters ending September 30, 2021, and March 31, 2022, to test. In total, we attempted to reconcile the 22 agency prepared CRF report templates to data in the state?s accounting system. We also attempted to reconcile the agency prepared CRF report template information to OMB?s master CRF report template and/or final submission. Lastly, we randomly sampled CRF expenditures from the agency prepared CRF report templates to test the categorical breakdown. Based on our testing, we identified: ? Approximately $61.1 million of CRF expenditures were not reported by various agencies to OMB in the proper quarter. Because material errors and omissions impacted total expenditures reported, the amounts reported by category will also be misstated. Lastly, if an error was identified or a modification needed to be made after a report was already approved by the Treasury OIG, the prime recipient was allowed to make the modification or correction in the next quarterly reporting cycle. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Office of Management and Budget strengthen procedures to ensure Federal reports are complete, accurate and reconcile to the state's accounting system. OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET RESPONSE The Office of Management and Budget agrees with this finding and the auditor?s recommendation. We agree with the auditor?s finding that certain agency expenditures were not reported in the proper quarter and that quarterly reports did not reconcile to the state accounting system. However, the Federal report was required to be submitted ten days after the close of the period. The state accounting system was not closed by the time the Federal reports were required to be submitted. The U.S. Department of Treasury recognized this and directed reporting agencies to correct and revise prior submissions when each subsequent report was submitted. OMB made these revisions as required and all expenditures were reported appropriately as the final Coronavirus Relief Funds reports were submitted. See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.
?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? CONDITION We identified Coronavirus Relief Fund (CRF) quarterly financial progress reports were incomplete, inaccurate and did not reconcile to the state's accounting system. CRITERIA Federal regulation, 2 CFR 200.303, requires non-Federal entities, in part, to establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Office of Management and Budget, 2 CFR Part 200, Appendix XI, 2021 and 2022 Compliance Supplements, for Assistance Listing 21.019 Coronavirus Relief Fund, states in part: Each prime recipient of the Fund shall provide a quarterly Financial Progress Report that contains COVID-19 related costs incurred during the covered period (the period beginning on March 1, 2020; and ending on December 31, 2021) to Treasury OIG. Each prime recipient shall report this quarterly information mentioned above into the Grant Solutions portal. The prime recipient?s quarterly Financial Progress Report submissions should be supported by the data in the prime recipient?s accounting system. Key Line Items ? The following line items from the reporting contain critical information: (1) The total amount of payments from the Fund received from Treasury. (2) The amount of funds received that were expended or obligated for each project or activity. (3) A detailed list of all projects or activities for which funds were expended or obligated, including: a. The name of the project or activity b. A description of the project or activity (4) Detailed information on any loans issued; contracts and grants awarded; transfers made to other government entities; and direct payments made by the prime recipient that are greater than $50,000. For amounts less than $50,000, the prime recipient must report in the aggregate for these expenditure categories. For direct payments to individuals, aggregate reporting is required to be reported regardless of amount. Beginning September 21, 2020, prime recipients were required to submit via the Grant Solutions portal the first detailed quarterly Financial Progress Report, which cover the period March 1 through June 30, 2020 (with exception to the September 21 first quarter deadline and the October 13 second quarter reporting deadlines for those prime recipients using Grant Solutions? upload feature, which was available December 1, 2020). Thereafter, quarterly reporting will be due no later than ten days after each calendar quarter. If the 10th calendar day falls on a weekend or a Federal holiday, the due date will be the next working day. Reporting shall end with either the calendar quarter after the COVID-19 related costs and expenditures have been liquidated and paid or the calendar quarter ending September 30, 2022, whichever comes first. The prime recipient?s quarterly Financial Progress Report submission should be supported by the data in the prime recipient?s accounting system. Department of the Treasury Office of Inspector General Coronavirus Relief Frequently Asked Questions Related to Reporting and Recordkeeping (OIG-CA-20-028R), if an error is identified or a modification needs to be made after a report is already approved by the Treasury OIG, the prime recipient will need to make the modification or correction in the next quarterly reporting cycle. CAUSE There was a lack of understanding across state agencies of the detailed requirements of Coronavirus Relief Fund reporting. The North Dakota Office of Management and Budget (OMB) provided the CRF Report Template, Data Upload Service Data Dictionary, Coronavirus Relief Fund Frequently Asked Questions, and instructions to all state agencies. However, OMB?s procedures to review the information submitted by state agencies did not detect all material errors and omissions within the reporting cycle. In addition, the short turnaround time for reporting deadlines contributed to reporting errors and omissions. EFFECT Inaccurate Federal reporting reduces transparency and may impair the Federal oversight agency's ability to properly oversee the program. CONTEXT State agencies prepared and submitted CRF report templates to the ND Office of Management and Budget (OMB). OMB compiled the information into a master CRF report template for submission. We randomly selected the quarters ending December 30, 2020, and December 31, 2021, to test across 11 state agencies. One agency did not have expenditures in the quarter ending December 31, 2021; therefore, we judgmentally selected the quarter ending March 31, 2021, to test. Another agency did not have expenditures in either of the quarters randomly selected; therefore, we judgmentally selected the quarters ending September 30, 2021, and March 31, 2022, to test. In total, we attempted to reconcile the 22 agency prepared CRF report templates to data in the state?s accounting system. We also attempted to reconcile the agency prepared CRF report template information to OMB?s master CRF report template and/or final submission. Lastly, we randomly sampled CRF expenditures from the agency prepared CRF report templates to test the categorical breakdown. Based on our testing, we identified: ? Approximately $61.1 million of CRF expenditures were not reported by various agencies to OMB in the proper quarter. Because material errors and omissions impacted total expenditures reported, the amounts reported by category will also be misstated. Lastly, if an error was identified or a modification needed to be made after a report was already approved by the Treasury OIG, the prime recipient was allowed to make the modification or correction in the next quarterly reporting cycle. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Office of Management and Budget strengthen procedures to ensure Federal reports are complete, accurate and reconcile to the state's accounting system. OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET RESPONSE The Office of Management and Budget agrees with this finding and the auditor?s recommendation. We agree with the auditor?s finding that certain agency expenditures were not reported in the proper quarter and that quarterly reports did not reconcile to the state accounting system. However, the Federal report was required to be submitted ten days after the close of the period. The state accounting system was not closed by the time the Federal reports were required to be submitted. The U.S. Department of Treasury recognized this and directed reporting agencies to correct and revise prior submissions when each subsequent report was submitted. OMB made these revisions as required and all expenditures were reported appropriately as the final Coronavirus Relief Funds reports were submitted. See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.
?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? CONDITION The State Treasurer's Office did not ensure all required information was provided to subrecipients of Coronavirus Relief Funds (CRF). In addition, the Office's internal controls were insufficient to ensure that subrecipients received communication regarding the necessary items. Required information not communicated included: ? Subrecipient's unique entity identifier, ? Federal award identification number, ? Federal award date, ? Subaward budget period start and end date, ? Total amount of Federal funds obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity including the current financial obligation, ? Total amount of Federal award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity, ? Name of awarding agency, ? Assistance listing number; and, ? Indirect cost rate for Federal award including if the de minimis rate is charged. CRITERIA Federal regulation, 2 CFR 200.332(a), requires pass-through entities to communicate specific required information to subrecipients. Federal regulation, 2 CFR 200.303, requires non-Federal entities, in part, to establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. CAUSE The documents used to communicate award information to subrecipients did not contain all required items. EFFECT These required communications are intended to help subrecipients meet all their reporting requirements, and to meet all award terms. Subrecipients subject to Single Audits also need this information for their audits. CONTEXT The State Treasurer's Office was appropriated approximately $123.3 million of funds from the Coronavirus Relief Fund (CRF) to be distributed to local governments. Almost all the funding was allocated to cities and counties based on salary and benefit expenses for licensed law enforcement officers since Federal guidance allowed for CRF funding to be used to reimburse law enforcement payroll costs. The Director of the Office of Management and Budget sent out an email to the North Dakota Association of Counties and to the North Dakota League of Cities to be forwarded to city and county leaders that indicated such funding was available. A Certification Law Enforcement Payroll Reimbursement Form was attached to the email. The combined information provided in the body of the email and the certification form did not contain all required items. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the State Treasurer's Office: A) Communicate all required information of 2 CFR 200.332(a) to subrecipients. B) Develop procedures to ensure that all Coronavirus Relief Fund award information is communicated to subrecipients. OFFICE OF STATE TREASURER RESPONSE The Office of State Treasurer does agree with finding that we were not in compliance with Federal regulations related to providing required information to subrecipients of Coronavirus Relief Funds (CRF). See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.
?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? CONDITION The Office of Management and Budget underreported both current period and cumulative expenditures by at least $117,366,999 on the project and expenditure report to the Department of Treasury covering the period of January 2022-March 2022. These expenditures were subsequently reported in the period of April 2022-June 2022. CRITERIA The interim final rule, issued May 17, 2021, states "The quarterly Project and Expenditure reports will include financial data, information on contracts and subawards over $50,000, types of projects funded, and other information regarding a recipient?s utilization of the award funds..... Treasury will provide additional guidance and instructions on the reporting requirements outlined above for the Fiscal Recovery Funds at a later date." (Federal Register Vol. 96, No.93 pgs. 26814-26815). The final rule published January 27, 2022 which amended the interim rule also stated "Recipients are advised to also consult Treasury?s Reporting and Compliance Guidance for additional information on program administration processes and requirements, including applicability of the Uniform Guidance". Federal Register Vol. 87, No.18 pg. 4340). Per this guidance which was first published June 17, 2021, recipients were required to submit Project and Expenditure reports that included current period expenditures and cumulative expenditures for reporting periods covering March 2021-December 2021 and January 2022-March 2022. (Compliance and Reporting Guidance - State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, V5.0 pg.17-19). The FY 2022 compliance supplement also states that the SEFA should report all aggregate expenditures for all four eligible use categories, not just the results of the revenue loss calculation or standard allowance. 2 CFR 200.303(a) states that non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. CAUSE Individual agencies paid SLFRF expenditures through the state's accounting system. OMB transferred reimbursement of expenditures to the individual agencies upon request. OMB reported information on the Federal project and expenditure reports based on OMB's transfers out to agencies. OMB tracked these transfers and reported the amount tracked as current period and cumulative period expenditures for their Project and Expenditure report. Expenditures may be reported on a cash or accrual basis. Some agencies did not request a transfer for paid expenditures or provide information relating to incurred expenditures to OMB prior to the reporting period end. The State Treasurer paid approximately $92 million and the Department of Human Services paid approximately $25 million during the period that was not transferred to these agencies until after the reporting period and not reported in the period January 2022-March 2022. EFFECT The timing of expenditures made using State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) was reported inaccurately to the Department of Treasury. CONTEXT In March 2021, the Federal Department of Treasury obligated funds to all 50 states under the State Local and Fiscal Recovery Fund to help states mitigate negative economic impacts caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. In November 2021, the special session of the 67th legislature obligated use of these funds to various agencies across the state. As the state was able to show that the revenue lost in years 2020 and 2021 exceeded the amount of the obligation from the Department of Treasury, the state was able to claim use of these funds under revenue replacement which allowed the state to utilize them for 'government operations' in addition to other specific uses and also allowing the state to report use of these funds under a single 'revenue replacement' project. The agencies began using the funds for purposes after they were obligated by the state legislature and began recording expenditures against the grant throughout our audit period. When these funds were initially disbursed to the state in March 2021, the funds were received by OMB and OMB then transferred reimbursement to agencies on request. North Dakota's project description on the reports was consistent and based on legislative appropriation. As reported, "Due to its extraordinary revenue loss during the pandemic, North Dakota?s entire SFRF allocation is dedicated to project expenditure category group 6 ? Revenue Replacement. Consequently, all expenditures will fall under project expenditure category 6.1 ? Provision of Government Services. Government services, as defined by the North Dakota legislature, includes economic development and workforce development initiatives, infrastructure and deferred maintenance initiatives, state service delivery and information technology improvements, and healthcare and emergency response initiatives." Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Office of Management and Budget develop corrective action and properly report the state's SLFRF current period expenditures and cumulative expenditures to the Department of Treasury as accumulated from each agency's records within the state's accounting system. OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET RESPONSE The Office of Management and Budget agrees with this finding. The expenditures referenced in this audit finding were incurred by agencies prior to the period in which the Federal funds were included in the quarterly expenditure reports for the State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund. Because OMB is responsible for the state reporting under this program, it is necessary to maintain some level of control over these funds. Consequently, OMB manages the funds centrally and developed a process to reimburse agencies for their eligible expenditures once expenditures were incurred and agencies requested reimbursement. As a result, reimbursement from the state?s allocation of SLFRF moneys always occurs after the agency expenditure. Funds are included in the Federal report for the period in which reimbursement from the SLFRF occurs. In some cases, this results in the agency expenditure occurring in a period prior to the period covered under the quarterly SLFRF report in which the reimbursement is reported. However, until reimbursement occurs, the expenditure is charged to a funding source other than SLFRF. All expenditures reimbursed through SLFRF are included in Federal reports for the period in which the reimbursement occurred. See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report. AUDITOR?S CONCLUDING COMMENTS While the Office of Management and Budget agrees with the finding, continuing Federal reporting based on the timing of reimbursed expenditures will likely cause further inaccurate SLFRF reporting. In addition, amounts transferred to agencies are not confirmed to not exceed incurred expenditures to ensure a reimbursement process is in place.
?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? CONDITION The Department of Public Instruction did not report Child Nutrition Cluster subawards to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) correctly. After testing FFATA reporting for the Child Nutrition Cluster, it was discovered that there were FFATA errors in the following three areas: 1. The Department of Public Instruction did not report the subaward information for the Fresh Fruit and Vegetable program (Assistance Listing number 10.582) for the 2021 grant year which runs from October 2020-September 2021. After an analysis of grant awards for that grant year, it was discovered that 14 subawards should have been reported to FFATA, totaling $1,593,654. ?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? 2. The Department of Public Instruction did not report the subaward information timely for the Fresh Fruit and Vegetable program (Assistance Listing number 10.582) for the 2022 grant year awards (October 2021-September 2022) awarded in October 2021. After an analysis of grant awards awarded in October 2021, we tested 5 of 13 awards and found all 5 were not submitted timely to FFATA. Four (4) of the tested awards should have been reported to FFATA by 1/31/2022. The fifth award should have been reported to FFATA by 2/28/2022. They were all reported to FFATA on 7/28/2022. Those grant awards totaled $623,000. ?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? 3. FFATA isn't being submitted for the following Assistance Listing numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.556 and 10.559. Because these Assistance Listing numbers are all included in one grant award, therefore, one FAIN number, they would all be reported in one FFATA report. The Department of Public Instruction did not report the subaward information for FAIN 223ND309N1099. After an analysis of these grant awards, 206 sponsors receiving total Federal grant payments over $30,000 should have been reported. Those grant payments totaled $168,897,721. The $169 million is based on payments made from 7/1/2020 - 6/30/2022. ?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? CRITERIA Federal regulation 2 CFR 170, Appendix A requires a Federal Financial Assistance Transparency Act (FFATA) report for each subaward that equals or exceeds $30,000 no later than the end of the month following the month in which the obligation was made. The subaward information is then available to the public on the USA Spending website for transparency. 2 CFR 200.303(a) states that non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. CAUSE Based on discussion with staff, a lack of understanding of FFATA reporting requirements resulted in the FFATA reporting errors. The Department of Public Instruction is only reporting FFATA for the Fresh Fruit and Vegetable program because the amounts given to sponsors is predetermined and not reimbursement based. For the other programs in the Child Nutrition Cluster, DPI does not report FFATA because they are meal count grants and amounts are not predetermined. There is no waiver or statement in the grant terms and conditions for the meal count grants saying that FFATA doesn?t need to be completed for these programs. The Department also couldn?t find a waiver or any information from their USDA contact saying that FFATA doesn?t need to be completed. Therefore, the FFATA should have been completed for all programs in the Child Nutrition Cluster. Because the awards to sponsors are not predetermined, the auditor is reporting grant payments during the audit period instead of award amounts. EFFECT Not meeting the FFATA requirements increases the likelihood that the public will not have access to transparent and accurate information regarding expenditures of Federal awards. Additionally, Federal regulations address actions that Federal agencies may impose if a state entity does not comply with the U.S. Constitution, Federal statutes, regulations, or the terms and conditions of a Federal award. According to 2 CFR 200.208(c), ?Specific conditions,? these actions may include ? requiring reimbursement instead of advance payments; ? not allowing the agency to proceed to the next phase until it submits evidence of acceptable performance; ? requiring additional, more detailed financial reports or additional project monitoring; ? requiring the agency to obtain technical or management assistance; or ? establishing other prior approvals. If the Federal agency determines the state agency cannot remedy its noncompliance through the above actions, 2 CFR 200.339, ?Remedies for noncompliance,? outlines additional actions the Federal agency may take. Depending on the circumstances, these actions may include ? temporarily withholding payments until the noncompliance has been corrected, ? denying the use of funds, ? partly or fully suspending or terminating the Federal award, ? suspending or debarring the agency, ? withholding further awards for the project or program, or ? pursuing other available legal remedies. CONTEXT There were 539 sponsors receiving Federal grant awards during our audit period totaling $174,653,181. Of those 539 sponsors, 233 (43%) were over the $30,000 threshold and should have been reported to FFATA, for a total of $172,004,887 (98%). Of the 233 sponsors over the $30,000 threshold, only 13 sponsors (6%) were reported to FFATA, totaling $1,513,512 (1%). This results in 220 sponsors receiving Federal grant awards (94%) not reported to FFATA, totaling $170,491,375 (99%). Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Public Instruction ensures timely and accurate submission of FFATA reports in accordance with Federal regulations and retain further instructions or waiver from the Federal agency. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION RESPONSE We agree with the finding. See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.
?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? CONDITION The Department of Public Instruction did not make subrecipients aware of all required grant award information for the Child Nutrition Cluster program prior to February of 2021. CRITERIA 31 U.S.C. 7502(f)(2)(A) states that each pass-through entity shall provide subrecipient the Federal requirements which govern the use of such awards. 2 CFR 200.332 states the required information that pass-through entities must disclose. This includes information related to Federal award identification, requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient, any additional requirements, approved federally recognized indirect cost rate, requirement that the subrecipient allow access to records, and appropriate terms and conditions concerning closeout of the subaward. 2 CFR 200.303(a) states that non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. CAUSE The prior audit finding corrective action wasn't implemented until February of 2021. Therefore, the grant templates were still missing information as was documented during the 2019-2020 single audit. EFFECT Subrecipients may not have been aware of all necessary grant information and requirements. CONTEXT During our audit period, there were 412 subrecipients receiving Federal grant agreements for the Child Nutrition Cluster program. During 2021, there were 215 subrecipients and 197 in 2022. As there was a similar finding in our prior audit that was not implemented until February of 2021, only grants obligated after this date and before the end of our audit period of 6/30/2022 were considered in our testing. Grants made prior to February 2021 were considered to have missing information. During our testing, no missing information was noted in grants made after February 2021. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Finding 2020-022 was reported in the immediate prior year. Finding 2018-042 and 2016-068 were made in previous years. The prior audit finding was reported as implemented on the summary schedule of prior audit findings. This materially misrepresents the status of the finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Public Instruction continue the corrective action that was implemented in February of 2021 to ensure subrecipients are made aware of all required grant award information for the Child Nutrition Cluster program. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION RESPONSE The Department of Public Instruction agrees with the recommendation See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.
?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? CONDITION The Department of Public Instruction did not ensure all subrecipients either submitted a Single Audit report or certification form identifying a Single Audit is not required. In addition, the Department did not issue management decisions on auditing findings within 6 months or ensure that timely and appropriate corrective action was taken in all applicable instances. We selected a sample of 60 subrecipients of the total 795 in our population for testing. During our testing, 6 of the 60 subrecipients did not submit a certification form identifying whether a Single Audit was required. The Department indicated that a Single Audit report was not received but we are unable to determine whether one was required. For 4 additional subrecipients, the Department did not receive a Single Audit, issue management decisions on auditing findings within 6 months, or ensure appropriate corrective action was taken. The Department did track all of their subrecipients in a spreadsheet that captured information relating to when their certified Federal expenditure information was received as well as if a single audit is required of them. However, due to the errors noted in receiving this information as well as following up with completed single audits in a timely manner in our sample tested, it was determined that this spreadsheet was not being fully utilized. CRITERIA 2 CFR 200.331(f) states that a pass-through entity must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by 2 CFR 200 Subpart F. 2 CFR 200.331(d)(2) states that a pass-through entity must ensure subrecipients take timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. 2 CFR 200.521(d) states that a pass-through entity must issue a management decision within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse. 2 CFR 200.303(a) states that non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. CAUSE The Department of Public Instruction maintains a spreadsheet to track all subrecipient audit report monitoring. However, they did not ensure that everyone on the spreadsheet provided a Single Audit report or certification of total federal expenditures. EFFECT Subrecipients spending more than $750,000 from all Federal sources may not be obtaining audits as required or implementing a corrective action plan in a timely manner if findings are noted in audits that were completed. CONTEXT The 4 subrecipients that did not provide a Single Audit report received approximately $9.9 million dollars in Federal expenditures. The additional 6 entities that did not provide certifications indicating their total Federal awards received approximately $1.5 million dollars. We did verify that the 6 entities that failed to provide certifications did not have Single Audit reports submitted to the clearing house. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Finding 2020-021 was reported in the immediate prior year. Finding 2018-041 was reported in a previous year. The prior audit finding was reported as implemented on the summary schedule of prior audit findings. This materially misrepresents the status of the finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Public Instruction: ? Ensure all subrecipients obtain audits in accordance with 2 CFR 200 Subpart F if they meet the requirements; ? Issue management decisions within a timely manner; ? Ensure subrecipients took timely corrective action on deficiencies identified in the audits. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION RESPONSE The Department of Public Instruction agrees with the finding. See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.
?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? CONDITION The Department of Public Instruction did not report Child Nutrition Cluster subawards to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) correctly. After testing FFATA reporting for the Child Nutrition Cluster, it was discovered that there were FFATA errors in the following three areas: 1. The Department of Public Instruction did not report the subaward information for the Fresh Fruit and Vegetable program (Assistance Listing number 10.582) for the 2021 grant year which runs from October 2020-September 2021. After an analysis of grant awards for that grant year, it was discovered that 14 subawards should have been reported to FFATA, totaling $1,593,654. ?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? 2. The Department of Public Instruction did not report the subaward information timely for the Fresh Fruit and Vegetable program (Assistance Listing number 10.582) for the 2022 grant year awards (October 2021-September 2022) awarded in October 2021. After an analysis of grant awards awarded in October 2021, we tested 5 of 13 awards and found all 5 were not submitted timely to FFATA. Four (4) of the tested awards should have been reported to FFATA by 1/31/2022. The fifth award should have been reported to FFATA by 2/28/2022. They were all reported to FFATA on 7/28/2022. Those grant awards totaled $623,000. ?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? 3. FFATA isn't being submitted for the following Assistance Listing numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.556 and 10.559. Because these Assistance Listing numbers are all included in one grant award, therefore, one FAIN number, they would all be reported in one FFATA report. The Department of Public Instruction did not report the subaward information for FAIN 223ND309N1099. After an analysis of these grant awards, 206 sponsors receiving total Federal grant payments over $30,000 should have been reported. Those grant payments totaled $168,897,721. The $169 million is based on payments made from 7/1/2020 - 6/30/2022. ?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? CRITERIA Federal regulation 2 CFR 170, Appendix A requires a Federal Financial Assistance Transparency Act (FFATA) report for each subaward that equals or exceeds $30,000 no later than the end of the month following the month in which the obligation was made. The subaward information is then available to the public on the USA Spending website for transparency. 2 CFR 200.303(a) states that non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. CAUSE Based on discussion with staff, a lack of understanding of FFATA reporting requirements resulted in the FFATA reporting errors. The Department of Public Instruction is only reporting FFATA for the Fresh Fruit and Vegetable program because the amounts given to sponsors is predetermined and not reimbursement based. For the other programs in the Child Nutrition Cluster, DPI does not report FFATA because they are meal count grants and amounts are not predetermined. There is no waiver or statement in the grant terms and conditions for the meal count grants saying that FFATA doesn?t need to be completed for these programs. The Department also couldn?t find a waiver or any information from their USDA contact saying that FFATA doesn?t need to be completed. Therefore, the FFATA should have been completed for all programs in the Child Nutrition Cluster. Because the awards to sponsors are not predetermined, the auditor is reporting grant payments during the audit period instead of award amounts. EFFECT Not meeting the FFATA requirements increases the likelihood that the public will not have access to transparent and accurate information regarding expenditures of Federal awards. Additionally, Federal regulations address actions that Federal agencies may impose if a state entity does not comply with the U.S. Constitution, Federal statutes, regulations, or the terms and conditions of a Federal award. According to 2 CFR 200.208(c), ?Specific conditions,? these actions may include ? requiring reimbursement instead of advance payments; ? not allowing the agency to proceed to the next phase until it submits evidence of acceptable performance; ? requiring additional, more detailed financial reports or additional project monitoring; ? requiring the agency to obtain technical or management assistance; or ? establishing other prior approvals. If the Federal agency determines the state agency cannot remedy its noncompliance through the above actions, 2 CFR 200.339, ?Remedies for noncompliance,? outlines additional actions the Federal agency may take. Depending on the circumstances, these actions may include ? temporarily withholding payments until the noncompliance has been corrected, ? denying the use of funds, ? partly or fully suspending or terminating the Federal award, ? suspending or debarring the agency, ? withholding further awards for the project or program, or ? pursuing other available legal remedies. CONTEXT There were 539 sponsors receiving Federal grant awards during our audit period totaling $174,653,181. Of those 539 sponsors, 233 (43%) were over the $30,000 threshold and should have been reported to FFATA, for a total of $172,004,887 (98%). Of the 233 sponsors over the $30,000 threshold, only 13 sponsors (6%) were reported to FFATA, totaling $1,513,512 (1%). This results in 220 sponsors receiving Federal grant awards (94%) not reported to FFATA, totaling $170,491,375 (99%). Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Public Instruction ensures timely and accurate submission of FFATA reports in accordance with Federal regulations and retain further instructions or waiver from the Federal agency. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION RESPONSE We agree with the finding. See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.
?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? CONDITION The Department of Public Instruction did not make subrecipients aware of all required grant award information for the Child Nutrition Cluster program prior to February of 2021. CRITERIA 31 U.S.C. 7502(f)(2)(A) states that each pass-through entity shall provide subrecipient the Federal requirements which govern the use of such awards. 2 CFR 200.332 states the required information that pass-through entities must disclose. This includes information related to Federal award identification, requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient, any additional requirements, approved federally recognized indirect cost rate, requirement that the subrecipient allow access to records, and appropriate terms and conditions concerning closeout of the subaward. 2 CFR 200.303(a) states that non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. CAUSE The prior audit finding corrective action wasn't implemented until February of 2021. Therefore, the grant templates were still missing information as was documented during the 2019-2020 single audit. EFFECT Subrecipients may not have been aware of all necessary grant information and requirements. CONTEXT During our audit period, there were 412 subrecipients receiving Federal grant agreements for the Child Nutrition Cluster program. During 2021, there were 215 subrecipients and 197 in 2022. As there was a similar finding in our prior audit that was not implemented until February of 2021, only grants obligated after this date and before the end of our audit period of 6/30/2022 were considered in our testing. Grants made prior to February 2021 were considered to have missing information. During our testing, no missing information was noted in grants made after February 2021. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Finding 2020-022 was reported in the immediate prior year. Finding 2018-042 and 2016-068 were made in previous years. The prior audit finding was reported as implemented on the summary schedule of prior audit findings. This materially misrepresents the status of the finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Public Instruction continue the corrective action that was implemented in February of 2021 to ensure subrecipients are made aware of all required grant award information for the Child Nutrition Cluster program. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION RESPONSE The Department of Public Instruction agrees with the recommendation See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.
?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? CONDITION The Department of Public Instruction did not ensure all subrecipients either submitted a Single Audit report or certification form identifying a Single Audit is not required. In addition, the Department did not issue management decisions on auditing findings within 6 months or ensure that timely and appropriate corrective action was taken in all applicable instances. We selected a sample of 60 subrecipients of the total 795 in our population for testing. During our testing, 6 of the 60 subrecipients did not submit a certification form identifying whether a Single Audit was required. The Department indicated that a Single Audit report was not received but we are unable to determine whether one was required. For 4 additional subrecipients, the Department did not receive a Single Audit, issue management decisions on auditing findings within 6 months, or ensure appropriate corrective action was taken. The Department did track all of their subrecipients in a spreadsheet that captured information relating to when their certified Federal expenditure information was received as well as if a single audit is required of them. However, due to the errors noted in receiving this information as well as following up with completed single audits in a timely manner in our sample tested, it was determined that this spreadsheet was not being fully utilized. CRITERIA 2 CFR 200.331(f) states that a pass-through entity must verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by 2 CFR 200 Subpart F. 2 CFR 200.331(d)(2) states that a pass-through entity must ensure subrecipients take timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. 2 CFR 200.521(d) states that a pass-through entity must issue a management decision within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse. 2 CFR 200.303(a) states that non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. CAUSE The Department of Public Instruction maintains a spreadsheet to track all subrecipient audit report monitoring. However, they did not ensure that everyone on the spreadsheet provided a Single Audit report or certification of total federal expenditures. EFFECT Subrecipients spending more than $750,000 from all Federal sources may not be obtaining audits as required or implementing a corrective action plan in a timely manner if findings are noted in audits that were completed. CONTEXT The 4 subrecipients that did not provide a Single Audit report received approximately $9.9 million dollars in Federal expenditures. The additional 6 entities that did not provide certifications indicating their total Federal awards received approximately $1.5 million dollars. We did verify that the 6 entities that failed to provide certifications did not have Single Audit reports submitted to the clearing house. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Finding 2020-021 was reported in the immediate prior year. Finding 2018-041 was reported in a previous year. The prior audit finding was reported as implemented on the summary schedule of prior audit findings. This materially misrepresents the status of the finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Public Instruction: ? Ensure all subrecipients obtain audits in accordance with 2 CFR 200 Subpart F if they meet the requirements; ? Issue management decisions within a timely manner; ? Ensure subrecipients took timely corrective action on deficiencies identified in the audits. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION RESPONSE The Department of Public Instruction agrees with the finding. See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.
?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? CONDITION The Department of Public Instruction did not report Child Nutrition Cluster subawards to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) correctly. After testing FFATA reporting for the Child Nutrition Cluster, it was discovered that there were FFATA errors in the following three areas: 1. The Department of Public Instruction did not report the subaward information for the Fresh Fruit and Vegetable program (Assistance Listing number 10.582) for the 2021 grant year which runs from October 2020-September 2021. After an analysis of grant awards for that grant year, it was discovered that 14 subawards should have been reported to FFATA, totaling $1,593,654. ?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? 2. The Department of Public Instruction did not report the subaward information timely for the Fresh Fruit and Vegetable program (Assistance Listing number 10.582) for the 2022 grant year awards (October 2021-September 2022) awarded in October 2021. After an analysis of grant awards awarded in October 2021, we tested 5 of 13 awards and found all 5 were not submitted timely to FFATA. Four (4) of the tested awards should have been reported to FFATA by 1/31/2022. The fifth award should have been reported to FFATA by 2/28/2022. They were all reported to FFATA on 7/28/2022. Those grant awards totaled $623,000. ?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? 3. FFATA isn't being submitted for the following Assistance Listing numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.556 and 10.559. Because these Assistance Listing numbers are all included in one grant award, therefore, one FAIN number, they would all be reported in one FFATA report. The Department of Public Instruction did not report the subaward information for FAIN 223ND309N1099. After an analysis of these grant awards, 206 sponsors receiving total Federal grant payments over $30,000 should have been reported. Those grant payments totaled $168,897,721. The $169 million is based on payments made from 7/1/2020 - 6/30/2022. ?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? CRITERIA Federal regulation 2 CFR 170, Appendix A requires a Federal Financial Assistance Transparency Act (FFATA) report for each subaward that equals or exceeds $30,000 no later than the end of the month following the month in which the obligation was made. The subaward information is then available to the public on the USA Spending website for transparency. 2 CFR 200.303(a) states that non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. CAUSE Based on discussion with staff, a lack of understanding of FFATA reporting requirements resulted in the FFATA reporting errors. The Department of Public Instruction is only reporting FFATA for the Fresh Fruit and Vegetable program because the amounts given to sponsors is predetermined and not reimbursement based. For the other programs in the Child Nutrition Cluster, DPI does not report FFATA because they are meal count grants and amounts are not predetermined. There is no waiver or statement in the grant terms and conditions for the meal count grants saying that FFATA doesn?t need to be completed for these programs. The Department also couldn?t find a waiver or any information from their USDA contact saying that FFATA doesn?t need to be completed. Therefore, the FFATA should have been completed for all programs in the Child Nutrition Cluster. Because the awards to sponsors are not predetermined, the auditor is reporting grant payments during the audit period instead of award amounts. EFFECT Not meeting the FFATA requirements increases the likelihood that the public will not have access to transparent and accurate information regarding expenditures of Federal awards. Additionally, Federal regulations address actions that Federal agencies may impose if a state entity does not comply with the U.S. Constitution, Federal statutes, regulations, or the terms and conditions of a Federal award. According to 2 CFR 200.208(c), ?Specific conditions,? these actions may include ? requiring reimbursement instead of advance payments; ? not allowing the agency to proceed to the next phase until it submits evidence of acceptable performance; ? requiring additional, more detailed financial reports or additional project monitoring; ? requiring the agency to obtain technical or management assistance; or ? establishing other prior approvals. If the Federal agency determines the state agency cannot remedy its noncompliance through the above actions, 2 CFR 200.339, ?Remedies for noncompliance,? outlines additional actions the Federal agency may take. Depending on the circumstances, these actions may include ? temporarily withholding payments until the noncompliance has been corrected, ? denying the use of funds, ? partly or fully suspending or terminating the Federal award, ? suspending or debarring the agency, ? withholding further awards for the project or program, or ? pursuing other available legal remedies. CONTEXT There were 539 sponsors receiving Federal grant awards during our audit period totaling $174,653,181. Of those 539 sponsors, 233 (43%) were over the $30,000 threshold and should have been reported to FFATA, for a total of $172,004,887 (98%). Of the 233 sponsors over the $30,000 threshold, only 13 sponsors (6%) were reported to FFATA, totaling $1,513,512 (1%). This results in 220 sponsors receiving Federal grant awards (94%) not reported to FFATA, totaling $170,491,375 (99%). Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Public Instruction ensures timely and accurate submission of FFATA reports in accordance with Federal regulations and retain further instructions or waiver from the Federal agency. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION RESPONSE We agree with the finding. See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.
?See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table? CONDITION The Department of Public Instruction did not make subrecipients aware of all required grant award information for the Child Nutrition Cluster program prior to February of 2021. CRITERIA 31 U.S.C. 7502(f)(2)(A) states that each pass-through entity shall provide subrecipient the Federal requirements which govern the use of such awards. 2 CFR 200.332 states the required information that pass-through entities must disclose. This includes information related to Federal award identification, requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient, any additional requirements, approved federally recognized indirect cost rate, requirement that the subrecipient allow access to records, and appropriate terms and conditions concerning closeout of the subaward. 2 CFR 200.303(a) states that non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. CAUSE The prior audit finding corrective action wasn't implemented until February of 2021. Therefore, the grant templates were still missing information as was documented during the 2019-2020 single audit. EFFECT Subrecipients may not have been aware of all necessary grant information and requirements. CONTEXT During our audit period, there were 412 subrecipients receiving Federal grant agreements for the Child Nutrition Cluster program. During 2021, there were 215 subrecipients and 197 in 2022. As there was a similar finding in our prior audit that was not implemented until February of 2021, only grants obligated after this date and before the end of our audit period of 6/30/2022 were considered in our testing. Grants made prior to February 2021 were considered to have missing information. During our testing, no missing information was noted in grants made after February 2021. Where sampling was performed, the audit used a non-statistical sampling method. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Finding 2020-022 was reported in the immediate prior year. Finding 2018-042 and 2016-068 were made in previous years. The prior audit finding was reported as implemented on the summary schedule of prior audit findings. This materially misrepresents the status of the finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Department of Public Instruction continue the corrective action that was implemented in February of 2021 to ensure subrecipients are made aware of all required grant award information for the Child Nutrition Cluster program. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION RESPONSE The Department of Public Instruction agrees with the recommendation See ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action? section of this report.
Review And Approval Of The Schedule Of Expenditures Of Federal Awards (SEFA) - Significant Deficiency All Federal Programs Criteria: The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303 requires that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e. auditee management) establish and maintain internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. The School should have a process in place to perform a review of the SEFA, to include evidence of the resolution of variances, as well as a process to document the overall review and approval to ensure proper presentation, completeness, and accuracy of the SEFA. Condition: During the course of the audit, the engagement team identified multiple instances where the SEFA was not accurately prepared and presented. Specifically, there were federal expenditures that were misclassified to the incorrect federal grant. The SEFA was corrected to correctly classify these expenses in the current year. The engagement team identified this as a pervasive deficiency impacting all schools, as the SEFA was prepared by the same management personnel. Cause: The entity does not have an appropriate process in place to review the SEFA, to include retaining evidence of the resolution of variances, as well as documentation of the overall review and approval. Effect: Potential misstatement could occur if expenditure amounts are not accurately presented on the SEFA. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context: Not applicable. Identification As A Repeat Finding: Yes. Recommendation: The School should develop a consistent process to review the SEFA. Issues identified during the course of the review should be investigated and resolved in a timely manner.
Review And Approval Of The Schedule Of Expenditures Of Federal Awards (SEFA) - Significant Deficiency All Federal Programs Criteria: The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303 requires that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e. auditee management) establish and maintain internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. The School should have a process in place to perform a review of the SEFA, to include evidence of the resolution of variances, as well as a process to document the overall review and approval to ensure proper presentation, completeness, and accuracy of the SEFA. Condition: During the course of the audit, the engagement team identified multiple instances where the SEFA was not accurately prepared and presented. Specifically, there were federal expenditures that were misclassified to the incorrect federal grant. The SEFA was corrected to correctly classify these expenses in the current year. The engagement team identified this as a pervasive deficiency impacting all schools, as the SEFA was prepared by the same management personnel. Cause: The entity does not have an appropriate process in place to review the SEFA, to include retaining evidence of the resolution of variances, as well as documentation of the overall review and approval. Effect: Potential misstatement could occur if expenditure amounts are not accurately presented on the SEFA. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context: Not applicable. Identification As A Repeat Finding: Yes. Recommendation: The School should develop a consistent process to review the SEFA. Issues identified during the course of the review should be investigated and resolved in a timely manner.
Review And Approval Of The Schedule Of Expenditures Of Federal Awards (SEFA) - Significant Deficiency All Federal Programs Criteria: The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303 requires that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e. auditee management) establish and maintain internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. The School should have a process in place to perform a review of the SEFA, to include evidence of the resolution of variances, as well as a process to document the overall review and approval to ensure proper presentation, completeness, and accuracy of the SEFA. Condition: During the course of the audit, the engagement team identified multiple instances where the SEFA was not accurately prepared and presented. Specifically, there were federal expenditures that were misclassified to the incorrect federal grant. The SEFA was corrected to correctly classify these expenses in the current year. The engagement team identified this as a pervasive deficiency impacting all schools, as the SEFA was prepared by the same management personnel. Cause: The entity does not have an appropriate process in place to review the SEFA, to include retaining evidence of the resolution of variances, as well as documentation of the overall review and approval. Effect: Potential misstatement could occur if expenditure amounts are not accurately presented on the SEFA. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context: Not applicable. Identification As A Repeat Finding: Yes. Recommendation: The School should develop a consistent process to review the SEFA. Issues identified during the course of the review should be investigated and resolved in a timely manner.
Approval Of Expense Reimbursement Submittals - Significant Deficiency - Activities Allowed Or Unallowed And Allowable Costs/Cost Principles ALNs 84.425/84.425C/84.425D/84.425U Elementary And Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund (ESSER) Criteria: The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303 requires that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e. auditee management) establish and maintain internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. The School has an internal control in place that expense reimbursement submittals on federal grants be approved by School management prior to their submission to the state for reimbursement. Condition: During the course of the audit, the engagement team identified multiple expenditures where the support showing School management?s approval of the expense reimbursement submittal for federal grants was unable to be provided. Cause: The entity did not maintain sufficient support documentation to prove that expenditures were reviewed before expense reimbursement requests were submitted. Effect: Potential noncompliance could occur if expenditure amounts are not reviewed by School management for accuracy and completeness. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context: Not applicable. Identification As A Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: The School should maintain proper documentation for all expense reimbursement submittals.
Review And Approval Of The Schedule Of Expenditures Of Federal Awards (SEFA) - Significant Deficiency All Federal Programs Criteria: The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303 requires that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e. auditee management) establish and maintain internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. The School should have a process in place to perform a review of the SEFA, to include evidence of the resolution of variances, as well as a process to document the overall review and approval to ensure proper presentation, completeness, and accuracy of the SEFA. Condition: During the course of the audit, the engagement team identified multiple instances where the SEFA was not accurately prepared and presented. Specifically, there were federal expenditures that were misclassified to the incorrect federal grant. The SEFA was corrected to correctly classify these expenses in the current year. The engagement team identified this as a pervasive deficiency impacting all schools, as the SEFA was prepared by the same management personnel. Cause: The entity does not have an appropriate process in place to review the SEFA, to include retaining evidence of the resolution of variances, as well as documentation of the overall review and approval. Effect: Potential misstatement could occur if expenditure amounts are not accurately presented on the SEFA. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context: Not applicable. Identification As A Repeat Finding: Yes. Recommendation: The School should develop a consistent process to review the SEFA. Issues identified during the course of the review should be investigated and resolved in a timely manner.