U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, passed through Kansas Department of Aging Aging Cluster - ALN 93.044 - Special Programs for the Aging_Title III, Part B_Grants for Supportive Services and Senior Centers - 2201KSOASS and 2201KSOACM ALN 93.045 - Special Programs for the Aging _Title III, Part C_Nutrition Services - 2201KSOAHD Criteria or Specific Requirement: Suspension and Debarment and Significant Deficiency In accordance with 2 CFR 200.214, non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. Per 2 CFR 200.303, the non-Federal entities receiving federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish and maintain internal control design to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: Suspension and debarment checks were not completed for the subrecipients that received federal funds. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: The single subrecipient under both ALN 93.044 and 93.045 receiving approximately $418,000 was not evaluated for suspension and debarment. It was noted after subsequent check, that the subrecipient was not suspended or debarred. Identification of Prior Year Finding: 2021-005 Effect: Federal funds could be paid to entities that are suspended or debarred. Cause: For the Unified Government, this is typically included in the contracts, but was not included in the subrecipient contracts for this program and the Unified Government did not have another means of validating suspension and debarment. Recommendation: Policies and procedures should be modified to ensure that suspension and debarment checks are performed on vendors and subrecipients alike prior to making purchases with federal funds. When newly established programs include subrecipients, we also recommend the contracts include suspension and debarment language. View of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Actions: The reason for recurrence is the finding was communicated late in the prior year and due to transition and turnover within the department's staff. Procurement has begun the process of checking SAM.gov for debarment for potential suppliers. Also, departments have been informed of this required step for both suppliers and subrecipients. Downstream, need to evaluate if this language can be added to the contract templates.
U.S. Department of Treasury COVID 19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - 21.027 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Suspension and Debarment and Significant Deficiency In accordance with 2 CFR 200.214, non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. "Covered transactions" include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. Per 2 CFR 200.303, the non-Federal entities receiving federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish and maintain internal control design to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: For vendor contracts, suspension and debarment checks were not performed. Questioned Costs - None noted. Context: For 21.027, there were 15 vendors receiving a total of $1,382,977 subject to suspension and debarment requirements. Of those 15, a sample of 3 vendors receiving a total of $324,205 were selected for testing and none of the three were verified by the Unified Government for Suspension and Debarment. A subsequent check was completed and none of the associated three vendors selected for testing were suspended or debarred. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Identification of Prior Year Finding: 2021-002 Effect: Federal funds could be paid to entities that are suspended or debarred. Cause: Expenditures for these programs were identified after many of these purchases had taken place. Departments performing their own procurement processes may not have been familiar with federal requirements or known at the time of purchase that this would be reimbursed with federal funds and did not complete the required suspension and debarment checks. Recommendation: We recommend that the Unified Government communicate to all departments that purchases using federal funds have suspension and debarment checks completed prior to purchase and the procurement department provide training on the requirements to properly document that suspension and debarment checks are completed. View of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Actions: The reason for recurrence is the finding was communicated late in the prior year and due to transition and turnover within the department's staff. Procurement has begun the process of checking SAM.gov for debarment for potential suppliers. Also, departments have been informed of this required step.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Emergency Solutions Grant Program - 14.231, Award number E-22-MC-0001 COVID-19 Emergency Solutions Grant Program - 14.231, Award number E-20-MW-20-0001 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Suspension and Debarment and Significant Deficiency In accordance with 2 CFR 200.214, non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. Per 2 CFR 200.303, the non-Federal entities receiving federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish and maintain internal control design to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: Suspension and debarment checks were not completed for the subrecipients that received federal funds. Questioned Costs - None noted. Context: For 14.231, there were seven subrecipients receiving a total of $1,013,942 subject to suspension and debarment requirements. Of those seven, a sample of two subrecipients receiving a total of $469,455 were selected for testing and none of the two were verified by the Unified Government for Suspension and Debarment. A subsequent check was completed and none of the associated two subrecipients selected for testing were suspended or debarred. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Identification of Prior Year Finding: N/A Effect: Federal funds could be paid to entities that are suspended or debarred. Cause: For the Unified Government, this is typically included in the contracts, but was not included in the subrecipient contracts for this program and the Unified Government did not have another means of validating suspension and debarment. Recommendation: Policies and procedures should be modified to ensure that suspension and debarment checks are performed on vendors and subrecipients alike prior to making purchases with federal funds. When newly established programs include subrecipients, we also recommend the contracts include suspension and debarment language. View of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Actions: Procurement has begun the process of checking SAM.gov for debarment for potential suppliers. Also, departments have been informed of this required step.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Emergency Solutions Grant Program - 14.231, Award number E-22-MC-0001 COVID-19 Emergency Solutions Grant Program - 14.231, Award number E-20-MW-20-0001 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Suspension and Debarment and Significant Deficiency In accordance with 2 CFR 200.214, non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. Per 2 CFR 200.303, the non-Federal entities receiving federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish and maintain internal control design to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: Suspension and debarment checks were not completed for the subrecipients that received federal funds. Questioned Costs - None noted. Context: For 14.231, there were seven subrecipients receiving a total of $1,013,942 subject to suspension and debarment requirements. Of those seven, a sample of two subrecipients receiving a total of $469,455 were selected for testing and none of the two were verified by the Unified Government for Suspension and Debarment. A subsequent check was completed and none of the associated two subrecipients selected for testing were suspended or debarred. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Identification of Prior Year Finding: N/A Effect: Federal funds could be paid to entities that are suspended or debarred. Cause: For the Unified Government, this is typically included in the contracts, but was not included in the subrecipient contracts for this program and the Unified Government did not have another means of validating suspension and debarment. Recommendation: Policies and procedures should be modified to ensure that suspension and debarment checks are performed on vendors and subrecipients alike prior to making purchases with federal funds. When newly established programs include subrecipients, we also recommend the contracts include suspension and debarment language. View of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Actions: Procurement has begun the process of checking SAM.gov for debarment for potential suppliers. Also, departments have been informed of this required step.
Finding No. 2022-001 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Commerce ALN and Title: 11.482 Coral Reef Conservation Program Compliance Requirement: Suspension and Debarment Questioned Cost: $0 Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.214, non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing 2 CFR 180. Such regulation restricts awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Under 2 CFR 180.300, when entering into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, verification must be made that the person with whom an intent to do business with is not excluded or disqualified. Such verification can be made by (a) checking SAM Exclusions, (b) collecting a certification from that person; or (c) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Condition The Trust could not provide written evidence showing that, prior to entering into a contract with a vendor, that the Trust concluded the vendor has not been debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from participating in the contract. Cause: The Trust does not have a written document proving prior to entering into a contract, that the vendor was deemed not to be debarred or suspended. Effect or potential effect: The Trust is in noncompliance with the applicable requirement. Recommendation: The Trust should revisit and implement procedures to ensure that vendors that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities are restricted from Federal awards, subawards and contracts. Procedures performed should be adequately maintained in the procurement files. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. See separate Corrective Action Plan.
Finding No. 2022-001 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Commerce ALN and Title: 11.482 Coral Reef Conservation Program Compliance Requirement: Suspension and Debarment Questioned Cost: $0 Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.214, non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing 2 CFR 180. Such regulation restricts awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Under 2 CFR 180.300, when entering into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, verification must be made that the person with whom an intent to do business with is not excluded or disqualified. Such verification can be made by (a) checking SAM Exclusions, (b) collecting a certification from that person; or (c) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Condition The Trust could not provide written evidence showing that, prior to entering into a contract with a vendor, that the Trust concluded the vendor has not been debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from participating in the contract. Cause: The Trust does not have a written document proving prior to entering into a contract, that the vendor was deemed not to be debarred or suspended. Effect or potential effect: The Trust is in noncompliance with the applicable requirement. Recommendation: The Trust should revisit and implement procedures to ensure that vendors that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities are restricted from Federal awards, subawards and contracts. Procedures performed should be adequately maintained in the procurement files. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. See separate Corrective Action Plan.
Finding No. 2022-001 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Commerce ALN and Title: 11.482 Coral Reef Conservation Program Compliance Requirement: Suspension and Debarment Questioned Cost: $0 Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.214, non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing 2 CFR 180. Such regulation restricts awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Under 2 CFR 180.300, when entering into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, verification must be made that the person with whom an intent to do business with is not excluded or disqualified. Such verification can be made by (a) checking SAM Exclusions, (b) collecting a certification from that person; or (c) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Condition The Trust could not provide written evidence showing that, prior to entering into a contract with a vendor, that the Trust concluded the vendor has not been debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from participating in the contract. Cause: The Trust does not have a written document proving prior to entering into a contract, that the vendor was deemed not to be debarred or suspended. Effect or potential effect: The Trust is in noncompliance with the applicable requirement. Recommendation: The Trust should revisit and implement procedures to ensure that vendors that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities are restricted from Federal awards, subawards and contracts. Procedures performed should be adequately maintained in the procurement files. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. See separate Corrective Action Plan.
Finding: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment (Significant Deficiency; Other Matter) Federal Assistance Listing Number 14.862 – Indian Community Development Block Grant Award Number – B-18-SR-40-0584 & B-19-SR-40-0584; Award Year 2018 & 2019 Federal Assistance Listing Number 21.027 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Award Number – 8L-SS-2021-0901-001; Award Year 2021 Suspension and Debarment Criteria or Specific Requirement: According to 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart C, 200.214 - Recipients and subrecipients are subject to the procurement, debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, as well as 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR Part 180 restrict making Federal awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from receiving or participating in Federal awards. Procurement Criteria or Specific Requirement: According to 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart D, 200.321 - When possible, the recipient or subrecipient should ensure there is open competition for non-micro purchases and an equitable distribution among suppliers for micro purchases. Condition: The Tribe was unable to provide supporting documentation showing that a verification had been performed to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred. Several large purchases were sole sourced without adequate documentation. A high volume of micro purchases were made from the same vendor rather than being distributed equitably amount a variety of vendors. Questioned Costs: None. Context: 14.862 - Three procurements were tested noting two in which suspension and debarment checks were not performed. A high volume of micro purchases ($148,908) were made from the same vendor rather than an equitable distribution of vendors. 21.027 - 14 procurements were tested. Ten procurements tested were subject to suspension and debarment of which checks were not performed on nine. All 14 procurements tested were subject to non-micro purchase requirements. Six procurements were sole sourced without adequate supporting documentation to support this method of purchase. A non-statistical sampling methodology was used to select the samples. Effect: The Tribe's inability to furnish supporting documentation showing that a check to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred on SAM.gov could result in the use of ineligible vendors. The Tribe's failure to provide for open competition or provide for an equitable distribution of vendors on purchases could result in the Tribe paying more for services than is reasonable or necessary. Cause: Tribal policies were not followed surrounding the requirement of suspension and debarment checks and documentation of sole source procurements. Due to the Tribal location, there may be some limitation of available vendors for consideration to ensure an equitable distribution. Identification as a Repeat Finding: 2021-005 (same issue in different program) Recommendation: We recommend the Department ensure existing procurement, suspension and debarment policies are understood throughout the Tribe and supporting documentation is adequate and maintained for all procurement decisions. Views of Responsible Officials: The Department agrees with the finding. See separate report for planned corrective actions.
Finding: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment (Significant Deficiency; Other Matter) Federal Assistance Listing Number 14.862 – Indian Community Development Block Grant Award Number – B-18-SR-40-0584 & B-19-SR-40-0584; Award Year 2018 & 2019 Federal Assistance Listing Number 21.027 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Award Number – 8L-SS-2021-0901-001; Award Year 2021 Suspension and Debarment Criteria or Specific Requirement: According to 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart C, 200.214 - Recipients and subrecipients are subject to the procurement, debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, as well as 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR Part 180 restrict making Federal awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from receiving or participating in Federal awards. Procurement Criteria or Specific Requirement: According to 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart D, 200.321 - When possible, the recipient or subrecipient should ensure there is open competition for non-micro purchases and an equitable distribution among suppliers for micro purchases. Condition: The Tribe was unable to provide supporting documentation showing that a verification had been performed to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred. Several large purchases were sole sourced without adequate documentation. A high volume of micro purchases were made from the same vendor rather than being distributed equitably amount a variety of vendors. Questioned Costs: None. Context: 14.862 - Three procurements were tested noting two in which suspension and debarment checks were not performed. A high volume of micro purchases ($148,908) were made from the same vendor rather than an equitable distribution of vendors. 21.027 - 14 procurements were tested. Ten procurements tested were subject to suspension and debarment of which checks were not performed on nine. All 14 procurements tested were subject to non-micro purchase requirements. Six procurements were sole sourced without adequate supporting documentation to support this method of purchase. A non-statistical sampling methodology was used to select the samples. Effect: The Tribe's inability to furnish supporting documentation showing that a check to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred on SAM.gov could result in the use of ineligible vendors. The Tribe's failure to provide for open competition or provide for an equitable distribution of vendors on purchases could result in the Tribe paying more for services than is reasonable or necessary. Cause: Tribal policies were not followed surrounding the requirement of suspension and debarment checks and documentation of sole source procurements. Due to the Tribal location, there may be some limitation of available vendors for consideration to ensure an equitable distribution. Identification as a Repeat Finding: 2021-005 (same issue in different program) Recommendation: We recommend the Department ensure existing procurement, suspension and debarment policies are understood throughout the Tribe and supporting documentation is adequate and maintained for all procurement decisions. Views of Responsible Officials: The Department agrees with the finding. See separate report for planned corrective actions.
Finding: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment (Significant Deficiency; Other Matter) Federal Assistance Listing Number 14.862 – Indian Community Development Block Grant Award Number – B-18-SR-40-0584 & B-19-SR-40-0584; Award Year 2018 & 2019 Federal Assistance Listing Number 21.027 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Award Number – 8L-SS-2021-0901-001; Award Year 2021 Suspension and Debarment Criteria or Specific Requirement: According to 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart C, 200.214 - Recipients and subrecipients are subject to the procurement, debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, as well as 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR Part 180 restrict making Federal awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from receiving or participating in Federal awards. Procurement Criteria or Specific Requirement: According to 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart D, 200.321 - When possible, the recipient or subrecipient should ensure there is open competition for non-micro purchases and an equitable distribution among suppliers for micro purchases. Condition: The Tribe was unable to provide supporting documentation showing that a verification had been performed to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred. Several large purchases were sole sourced without adequate documentation. A high volume of micro purchases were made from the same vendor rather than being distributed equitably amount a variety of vendors. Questioned Costs: None. Context: 14.862 - Three procurements were tested noting two in which suspension and debarment checks were not performed. A high volume of micro purchases ($148,908) were made from the same vendor rather than an equitable distribution of vendors. 21.027 - 14 procurements were tested. Ten procurements tested were subject to suspension and debarment of which checks were not performed on nine. All 14 procurements tested were subject to non-micro purchase requirements. Six procurements were sole sourced without adequate supporting documentation to support this method of purchase. A non-statistical sampling methodology was used to select the samples. Effect: The Tribe's inability to furnish supporting documentation showing that a check to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred on SAM.gov could result in the use of ineligible vendors. The Tribe's failure to provide for open competition or provide for an equitable distribution of vendors on purchases could result in the Tribe paying more for services than is reasonable or necessary. Cause: Tribal policies were not followed surrounding the requirement of suspension and debarment checks and documentation of sole source procurements. Due to the Tribal location, there may be some limitation of available vendors for consideration to ensure an equitable distribution. Identification as a Repeat Finding: 2021-005 (same issue in different program) Recommendation: We recommend the Department ensure existing procurement, suspension and debarment policies are understood throughout the Tribe and supporting documentation is adequate and maintained for all procurement decisions. Views of Responsible Officials: The Department agrees with the finding. See separate report for planned corrective actions.
Criteria: As stated in 2 CFR §200.303, the non-Federal entity (i.e. the Center) must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or in the “Internal Control Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). According to 2 CFR §200.214, the non-Federal entity is subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Condition: During our audit, we noted several cases in which the Center did not perform, or did not maintain proper support to demonstrate that it performed checks via SAM.gov to ensure that potential vendors, contractors, or consultants are suspended or debarred. The failure to screen such parties increases the possibility that U.S. Government funds may inadvertently be provided to individuals or organizations deemed to be excluded by the U.S. Government. Cause: Management did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that suspension and debarment was being performed prior to entering into contracts with vendors or contractors/ consultants. Effect or Potential Effect: The Center is exposed to an increased risk that future noncompliance could occur by entering into transactions with vendors, contractors, or consultants that are suspended and debarred. Effect or Potential Effect (continued): If a non-Federal entity knowingly does business with an excluded person, the agency responsible for the Center's funding may disallow costs, annul or terminate the transaction, issue a stop work order, debar or suspend the non-Federal entity, or take other remedies as appropriate. Questioned Costs: None. Context: The Center failed to perform and/or properly document its due diligence with respect to these requirements. The issue is considered systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend the Center implement internal controls to ensure that all vendors, contractors, and consultants are screened for suspension and debarment prior to entering into any executed contract. We further recommend that a policy be formalized and implemented that requires an annual screening of any current vendors, contractors, or consultants as well.
Criteria: As stated in 2 CFR §200.303, the non-Federal entity (i.e. the Center) must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or in the “Internal Control Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). According to 2 CFR §200.214, the non-Federal entity is subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Condition: During our audit, we noted several cases in which the Center did not perform, or did not maintain proper support to demonstrate that it performed checks via SAM.gov to ensure that potential vendors, contractors, or consultants are suspended or debarred. The failure to screen such parties increases the possibility that U.S. Government funds may inadvertently be provided to individuals or organizations deemed to be excluded by the U.S. Government. Cause: Management did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that suspension and debarment was being performed prior to entering into contracts with vendors or contractors/ consultants. Effect or Potential Effect: The Center is exposed to an increased risk that future noncompliance could occur by entering into transactions with vendors, contractors, or consultants that are suspended and debarred. Effect or Potential Effect (continued): If a non-Federal entity knowingly does business with an excluded person, the agency responsible for the Center's funding may disallow costs, annul or terminate the transaction, issue a stop work order, debar or suspend the non-Federal entity, or take other remedies as appropriate. Questioned Costs: None. Context: The Center failed to perform and/or properly document its due diligence with respect to these requirements. The issue is considered systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend the Center implement internal controls to ensure that all vendors, contractors, and consultants are screened for suspension and debarment prior to entering into any executed contract. We further recommend that a policy be formalized and implemented that requires an annual screening of any current vendors, contractors, or consultants as well.
Criteria: As stated in 2 CFR §200.303, the non-Federal entity (i.e. the Center) must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or in the “Internal Control Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). According to 2 CFR §200.214, the non-Federal entity is subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Condition: During our audit, we noted several cases in which the Center did not perform, or did not maintain proper support to demonstrate that it performed checks via SAM.gov to ensure that potential vendors, contractors, or consultants are suspended or debarred. The failure to screen such parties increases the possibility that U.S. Government funds may inadvertently be provided to individuals or organizations deemed to be excluded by the U.S. Government. Cause: Management did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that suspension and debarment was being performed prior to entering into contracts with vendors or contractors/ consultants. Effect or Potential Effect: The Center is exposed to an increased risk that future noncompliance could occur by entering into transactions with vendors, contractors, or consultants that are suspended and debarred. Effect or Potential Effect (continued): If a non-Federal entity knowingly does business with an excluded person, the agency responsible for the Center's funding may disallow costs, annul or terminate the transaction, issue a stop work order, debar or suspend the non-Federal entity, or take other remedies as appropriate. Questioned Costs: None. Context: The Center failed to perform and/or properly document its due diligence with respect to these requirements. The issue is considered systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend the Center implement internal controls to ensure that all vendors, contractors, and consultants are screened for suspension and debarment prior to entering into any executed contract. We further recommend that a policy be formalized and implemented that requires an annual screening of any current vendors, contractors, or consultants as well.
Criteria: As stated in 2 CFR §200.303, the non-Federal entity (i.e. the Center) must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or in the “Internal Control Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). According to 2 CFR §200.214, the non-Federal entity is subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Condition: During our audit, we noted several cases in which the Center did not perform, or did not maintain proper support to demonstrate that it performed checks via SAM.gov to ensure that potential vendors, contractors, or consultants are suspended or debarred. The failure to screen such parties increases the possibility that U.S. Government funds may inadvertently be provided to individuals or organizations deemed to be excluded by the U.S. Government. Cause: Management did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that suspension and debarment was being performed prior to entering into contracts with vendors or contractors/ consultants. Effect or Potential Effect: The Center is exposed to an increased risk that future noncompliance could occur by entering into transactions with vendors, contractors, or consultants that are suspended and debarred. Effect or Potential Effect (continued): If a non-Federal entity knowingly does business with an excluded person, the agency responsible for the Center's funding may disallow costs, annul or terminate the transaction, issue a stop work order, debar or suspend the non-Federal entity, or take other remedies as appropriate. Questioned Costs: None. Context: The Center failed to perform and/or properly document its due diligence with respect to these requirements. The issue is considered systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend the Center implement internal controls to ensure that all vendors, contractors, and consultants are screened for suspension and debarment prior to entering into any executed contract. We further recommend that a policy be formalized and implemented that requires an annual screening of any current vendors, contractors, or consultants as well.
Criteria: As stated in 2 CFR §200.303, the non-Federal entity (i.e. the Center) must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or in the “Internal Control Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). According to 2 CFR §200.214, the non-Federal entity is subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Condition: During our audit, we noted several cases in which the Center did not perform, or did not maintain proper support to demonstrate that it performed checks via SAM.gov to ensure that potential vendors, contractors, or consultants are suspended or debarred. The failure to screen such parties increases the possibility that U.S. Government funds may inadvertently be provided to individuals or organizations deemed to be excluded by the U.S. Government. Cause: Management did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that suspension and debarment was being performed prior to entering into contracts with vendors or contractors/ consultants. Effect or Potential Effect: The Center is exposed to an increased risk that future noncompliance could occur by entering into transactions with vendors, contractors, or consultants that are suspended and debarred. Effect or Potential Effect (continued): If a non-Federal entity knowingly does business with an excluded person, the agency responsible for the Center's funding may disallow costs, annul or terminate the transaction, issue a stop work order, debar or suspend the non-Federal entity, or take other remedies as appropriate. Questioned Costs: None. Context: The Center failed to perform and/or properly document its due diligence with respect to these requirements. The issue is considered systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend the Center implement internal controls to ensure that all vendors, contractors, and consultants are screened for suspension and debarment prior to entering into any executed contract. We further recommend that a policy be formalized and implemented that requires an annual screening of any current vendors, contractors, or consultants as well.
Criteria: As stated in 2 CFR §200.303, the non-Federal entity (i.e. the Center) must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or in the “Internal Control Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). According to 2 CFR §200.214, the non-Federal entity is subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Condition: During our audit, we noted several cases in which the Center did not perform, or did not maintain proper support to demonstrate that it performed checks via SAM.gov to ensure that potential vendors, contractors, or consultants are suspended or debarred. The failure to screen such parties increases the possibility that U.S. Government funds may inadvertently be provided to individuals or organizations deemed to be excluded by the U.S. Government. Cause: Management did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that suspension and debarment was being performed prior to entering into contracts with vendors or contractors/ consultants. Effect or Potential Effect: The Center is exposed to an increased risk that future noncompliance could occur by entering into transactions with vendors, contractors, or consultants that are suspended and debarred. Effect or Potential Effect (continued): If a non-Federal entity knowingly does business with an excluded person, the agency responsible for the Center's funding may disallow costs, annul or terminate the transaction, issue a stop work order, debar or suspend the non-Federal entity, or take other remedies as appropriate. Questioned Costs: None. Context: The Center failed to perform and/or properly document its due diligence with respect to these requirements. The issue is considered systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend the Center implement internal controls to ensure that all vendors, contractors, and consultants are screened for suspension and debarment prior to entering into any executed contract. We further recommend that a policy be formalized and implemented that requires an annual screening of any current vendors, contractors, or consultants as well.
Criteria: As stated in 2 CFR §200.303, the non-Federal entity (i.e. the Center) must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or in the “Internal Control Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). According to 2 CFR §200.214, the non-Federal entity is subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Condition: During our audit, we noted several cases in which the Center did not perform, or did not maintain proper support to demonstrate that it performed checks via SAM.gov to ensure that potential vendors, contractors, or consultants are suspended or debarred. The failure to screen such parties increases the possibility that U.S. Government funds may inadvertently be provided to individuals or organizations deemed to be excluded by the U.S. Government. Cause: Management did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that suspension and debarment was being performed prior to entering into contracts with vendors or contractors/ consultants. Effect or Potential Effect: The Center is exposed to an increased risk that future noncompliance could occur by entering into transactions with vendors, contractors, or consultants that are suspended and debarred. Effect or Potential Effect (continued): If a non-Federal entity knowingly does business with an excluded person, the agency responsible for the Center's funding may disallow costs, annul or terminate the transaction, issue a stop work order, debar or suspend the non-Federal entity, or take other remedies as appropriate. Questioned Costs: None. Context: The Center failed to perform and/or properly document its due diligence with respect to these requirements. The issue is considered systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend the Center implement internal controls to ensure that all vendors, contractors, and consultants are screened for suspension and debarment prior to entering into any executed contract. We further recommend that a policy be formalized and implemented that requires an annual screening of any current vendors, contractors, or consultants as well.
Criteria: As stated in 2 CFR §200.303, the non-Federal entity (i.e. the Center) must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or in the “Internal Control Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). According to 2 CFR §200.214, the non-Federal entity is subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Condition: During our audit, we noted several cases in which the Center did not perform, or did not maintain proper support to demonstrate that it performed checks via SAM.gov to ensure that potential vendors, contractors, or consultants are suspended or debarred. The failure to screen such parties increases the possibility that U.S. Government funds may inadvertently be provided to individuals or organizations deemed to be excluded by the U.S. Government. Cause: Management did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that suspension and debarment was being performed prior to entering into contracts with vendors or contractors/ consultants. Effect or Potential Effect: The Center is exposed to an increased risk that future noncompliance could occur by entering into transactions with vendors, contractors, or consultants that are suspended and debarred. Effect or Potential Effect (continued): If a non-Federal entity knowingly does business with an excluded person, the agency responsible for the Center's funding may disallow costs, annul or terminate the transaction, issue a stop work order, debar or suspend the non-Federal entity, or take other remedies as appropriate. Questioned Costs: None. Context: The Center failed to perform and/or properly document its due diligence with respect to these requirements. The issue is considered systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend the Center implement internal controls to ensure that all vendors, contractors, and consultants are screened for suspension and debarment prior to entering into any executed contract. We further recommend that a policy be formalized and implemented that requires an annual screening of any current vendors, contractors, or consultants as well.
Criteria: As stated in 2 CFR §200.303, the non-Federal entity (i.e. the Center) must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or in the “Internal Control Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). According to 2 CFR §200.214, the non-Federal entity is subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Condition: During our audit, we noted several cases in which the Center did not perform, or did not maintain proper support to demonstrate that it performed checks via SAM.gov to ensure that potential vendors, contractors, or consultants are suspended or debarred. The failure to screen such parties increases the possibility that U.S. Government funds may inadvertently be provided to individuals or organizations deemed to be excluded by the U.S. Government. Cause: Management did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that suspension and debarment was being performed prior to entering into contracts with vendors or contractors/ consultants. Effect or Potential Effect: The Center is exposed to an increased risk that future noncompliance could occur by entering into transactions with vendors, contractors, or consultants that are suspended and debarred. Effect or Potential Effect (continued): If a non-Federal entity knowingly does business with an excluded person, the agency responsible for the Center's funding may disallow costs, annul or terminate the transaction, issue a stop work order, debar or suspend the non-Federal entity, or take other remedies as appropriate. Questioned Costs: None. Context: The Center failed to perform and/or properly document its due diligence with respect to these requirements. The issue is considered systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend the Center implement internal controls to ensure that all vendors, contractors, and consultants are screened for suspension and debarment prior to entering into any executed contract. We further recommend that a policy be formalized and implemented that requires an annual screening of any current vendors, contractors, or consultants as well.
Criteria: As stated in 2 CFR §200.303, the non-Federal entity (i.e. the Center) must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or in the “Internal Control Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). According to 2 CFR §200.214, the non-Federal entity is subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Condition: During our audit, we noted several cases in which the Center did not perform, or did not maintain proper support to demonstrate that it performed checks via SAM.gov to ensure that potential vendors, contractors, or consultants are suspended or debarred. The failure to screen such parties increases the possibility that U.S. Government funds may inadvertently be provided to individuals or organizations deemed to be excluded by the U.S. Government. Cause: Management did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that suspension and debarment was being performed prior to entering into contracts with vendors or contractors/ consultants. Effect or Potential Effect: The Center is exposed to an increased risk that future noncompliance could occur by entering into transactions with vendors, contractors, or consultants that are suspended and debarred. Effect or Potential Effect (continued): If a non-Federal entity knowingly does business with an excluded person, the agency responsible for the Center's funding may disallow costs, annul or terminate the transaction, issue a stop work order, debar or suspend the non-Federal entity, or take other remedies as appropriate. Questioned Costs: None. Context: The Center failed to perform and/or properly document its due diligence with respect to these requirements. The issue is considered systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend the Center implement internal controls to ensure that all vendors, contractors, and consultants are screened for suspension and debarment prior to entering into any executed contract. We further recommend that a policy be formalized and implemented that requires an annual screening of any current vendors, contractors, or consultants as well.
Criteria: As stated in 2 CFR §200.303, the non-Federal entity (i.e. the Center) must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or in the “Internal Control Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). According to 2 CFR §200.214, the non-Federal entity is subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Condition: During our audit, we noted several cases in which the Center did not perform, or did not maintain proper support to demonstrate that it performed checks via SAM.gov to ensure that potential vendors, contractors, or consultants are suspended or debarred. The failure to screen such parties increases the possibility that U.S. Government funds may inadvertently be provided to individuals or organizations deemed to be excluded by the U.S. Government. Cause: Management did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that suspension and debarment was being performed prior to entering into contracts with vendors or contractors/ consultants. Effect or Potential Effect: The Center is exposed to an increased risk that future noncompliance could occur by entering into transactions with vendors, contractors, or consultants that are suspended and debarred. Effect or Potential Effect (continued): If a non-Federal entity knowingly does business with an excluded person, the agency responsible for the Center's funding may disallow costs, annul or terminate the transaction, issue a stop work order, debar or suspend the non-Federal entity, or take other remedies as appropriate. Questioned Costs: None. Context: The Center failed to perform and/or properly document its due diligence with respect to these requirements. The issue is considered systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend the Center implement internal controls to ensure that all vendors, contractors, and consultants are screened for suspension and debarment prior to entering into any executed contract. We further recommend that a policy be formalized and implemented that requires an annual screening of any current vendors, contractors, or consultants as well.
Criteria: As stated in 2 CFR §200.303, the non-Federal entity (i.e. the Center) must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or in the “Internal Control Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). According to 2 CFR §200.214, the non-Federal entity is subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Condition: During our audit, we noted several cases in which the Center did not perform, or did not maintain proper support to demonstrate that it performed checks via SAM.gov to ensure that potential vendors, contractors, or consultants are suspended or debarred. The failure to screen such parties increases the possibility that U.S. Government funds may inadvertently be provided to individuals or organizations deemed to be excluded by the U.S. Government. Cause: Management did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that suspension and debarment was being performed prior to entering into contracts with vendors or contractors/ consultants. Effect or Potential Effect: The Center is exposed to an increased risk that future noncompliance could occur by entering into transactions with vendors, contractors, or consultants that are suspended and debarred. Effect or Potential Effect (continued): If a non-Federal entity knowingly does business with an excluded person, the agency responsible for the Center's funding may disallow costs, annul or terminate the transaction, issue a stop work order, debar or suspend the non-Federal entity, or take other remedies as appropriate. Questioned Costs: None. Context: The Center failed to perform and/or properly document its due diligence with respect to these requirements. The issue is considered systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend the Center implement internal controls to ensure that all vendors, contractors, and consultants are screened for suspension and debarment prior to entering into any executed contract. We further recommend that a policy be formalized and implemented that requires an annual screening of any current vendors, contractors, or consultants as well.
Criteria: As stated in 2 CFR §200.303, the non-Federal entity (i.e. the Center) must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or in the “Internal Control Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). According to 2 CFR §200.214, the non-Federal entity is subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Condition: During our audit, we noted several cases in which the Center did not perform, or did not maintain proper support to demonstrate that it performed checks via SAM.gov to ensure that potential vendors, contractors, or consultants are suspended or debarred. The failure to screen such parties increases the possibility that U.S. Government funds may inadvertently be provided to individuals or organizations deemed to be excluded by the U.S. Government. Cause: Management did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that suspension and debarment was being performed prior to entering into contracts with vendors or contractors/ consultants. Effect or Potential Effect: The Center is exposed to an increased risk that future noncompliance could occur by entering into transactions with vendors, contractors, or consultants that are suspended and debarred. Effect or Potential Effect (continued): If a non-Federal entity knowingly does business with an excluded person, the agency responsible for the Center's funding may disallow costs, annul or terminate the transaction, issue a stop work order, debar or suspend the non-Federal entity, or take other remedies as appropriate. Questioned Costs: None. Context: The Center failed to perform and/or properly document its due diligence with respect to these requirements. The issue is considered systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend the Center implement internal controls to ensure that all vendors, contractors, and consultants are screened for suspension and debarment prior to entering into any executed contract. We further recommend that a policy be formalized and implemented that requires an annual screening of any current vendors, contractors, or consultants as well.
Criteria: As stated in 2 CFR §200.303, the non-Federal entity (i.e. the Center) must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or in the “Internal Control Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). According to 2 CFR §200.214, the non-Federal entity is subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Condition: During our audit, we noted several cases in which the Center did not perform, or did not maintain proper support to demonstrate that it performed checks via SAM.gov to ensure that potential vendors, contractors, or consultants are suspended or debarred. The failure to screen such parties increases the possibility that U.S. Government funds may inadvertently be provided to individuals or organizations deemed to be excluded by the U.S. Government. Cause: Management did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that suspension and debarment was being performed prior to entering into contracts with vendors or contractors/ consultants. Effect or Potential Effect: The Center is exposed to an increased risk that future noncompliance could occur by entering into transactions with vendors, contractors, or consultants that are suspended and debarred. Effect or Potential Effect (continued): If a non-Federal entity knowingly does business with an excluded person, the agency responsible for the Center's funding may disallow costs, annul or terminate the transaction, issue a stop work order, debar or suspend the non-Federal entity, or take other remedies as appropriate. Questioned Costs: None. Context: The Center failed to perform and/or properly document its due diligence with respect to these requirements. The issue is considered systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend the Center implement internal controls to ensure that all vendors, contractors, and consultants are screened for suspension and debarment prior to entering into any executed contract. We further recommend that a policy be formalized and implemented that requires an annual screening of any current vendors, contractors, or consultants as well.
Criteria: As stated in 2 CFR §200.303, the non-Federal entity (i.e. the Center) must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or in the “Internal Control Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). According to 2 CFR §200.214, the non-Federal entity is subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Condition: During our audit, we noted several cases in which the Center did not perform, or did not maintain proper support to demonstrate that it performed checks via SAM.gov to ensure that potential vendors, contractors, or consultants are suspended or debarred. The failure to screen such parties increases the possibility that U.S. Government funds may inadvertently be provided to individuals or organizations deemed to be excluded by the U.S. Government. Cause: Management did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that suspension and debarment was being performed prior to entering into contracts with vendors or contractors/ consultants. Effect or Potential Effect: The Center is exposed to an increased risk that future noncompliance could occur by entering into transactions with vendors, contractors, or consultants that are suspended and debarred. Effect or Potential Effect (continued): If a non-Federal entity knowingly does business with an excluded person, the agency responsible for the Center's funding may disallow costs, annul or terminate the transaction, issue a stop work order, debar or suspend the non-Federal entity, or take other remedies as appropriate. Questioned Costs: None. Context: The Center failed to perform and/or properly document its due diligence with respect to these requirements. The issue is considered systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend the Center implement internal controls to ensure that all vendors, contractors, and consultants are screened for suspension and debarment prior to entering into any executed contract. We further recommend that a policy be formalized and implemented that requires an annual screening of any current vendors, contractors, or consultants as well.
Criteria: As stated in 2 CFR §200.303, the non-Federal entity (i.e. the Center) must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or in the “Internal Control Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). According to 2 CFR §200.214, the non-Federal entity is subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Condition: During our audit, we noted several cases in which the Center did not perform, or did not maintain proper support to demonstrate that it performed checks via SAM.gov to ensure that potential vendors, contractors, or consultants are suspended or debarred. The failure to screen such parties increases the possibility that U.S. Government funds may inadvertently be provided to individuals or organizations deemed to be excluded by the U.S. Government. Cause: Management did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that suspension and debarment was being performed prior to entering into contracts with vendors or contractors/ consultants. Effect or Potential Effect: The Center is exposed to an increased risk that future noncompliance could occur by entering into transactions with vendors, contractors, or consultants that are suspended and debarred. Effect or Potential Effect (continued): If a non-Federal entity knowingly does business with an excluded person, the agency responsible for the Center's funding may disallow costs, annul or terminate the transaction, issue a stop work order, debar or suspend the non-Federal entity, or take other remedies as appropriate. Questioned Costs: None. Context: The Center failed to perform and/or properly document its due diligence with respect to these requirements. The issue is considered systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend the Center implement internal controls to ensure that all vendors, contractors, and consultants are screened for suspension and debarment prior to entering into any executed contract. We further recommend that a policy be formalized and implemented that requires an annual screening of any current vendors, contractors, or consultants as well.
Criteria: As stated in 2 CFR §200.303, the non-Federal entity (i.e. the Center) must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or in the “Internal Control Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). According to 2 CFR §200.214, the non-Federal entity is subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Condition: During our audit, we noted several cases in which the Center did not perform, or did not maintain proper support to demonstrate that it performed checks via SAM.gov to ensure that potential vendors, contractors, or consultants are suspended or debarred. The failure to screen such parties increases the possibility that U.S. Government funds may inadvertently be provided to individuals or organizations deemed to be excluded by the U.S. Government. Cause: Management did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that suspension and debarment was being performed prior to entering into contracts with vendors or contractors/ consultants. Effect or Potential Effect: The Center is exposed to an increased risk that future noncompliance could occur by entering into transactions with vendors, contractors, or consultants that are suspended and debarred. Effect or Potential Effect (continued): If a non-Federal entity knowingly does business with an excluded person, the agency responsible for the Center's funding may disallow costs, annul or terminate the transaction, issue a stop work order, debar or suspend the non-Federal entity, or take other remedies as appropriate. Questioned Costs: None. Context: The Center failed to perform and/or properly document its due diligence with respect to these requirements. The issue is considered systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend the Center implement internal controls to ensure that all vendors, contractors, and consultants are screened for suspension and debarment prior to entering into any executed contract. We further recommend that a policy be formalized and implemented that requires an annual screening of any current vendors, contractors, or consultants as well.
Criteria: As stated in 2 CFR §200.303, the non-Federal entity (i.e. the Center) must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or in the “Internal Control Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). According to 2 CFR §200.214, the non-Federal entity is subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Condition: During our audit, we noted several cases in which the Center did not perform, or did not maintain proper support to demonstrate that it performed checks via SAM.gov to ensure that potential vendors, contractors, or consultants are suspended or debarred. The failure to screen such parties increases the possibility that U.S. Government funds may inadvertently be provided to individuals or organizations deemed to be excluded by the U.S. Government. Cause: Management did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that suspension and debarment was being performed prior to entering into contracts with vendors or contractors/ consultants. Effect or Potential Effect: The Center is exposed to an increased risk that future noncompliance could occur by entering into transactions with vendors, contractors, or consultants that are suspended and debarred. Effect or Potential Effect (continued): If a non-Federal entity knowingly does business with an excluded person, the agency responsible for the Center's funding may disallow costs, annul or terminate the transaction, issue a stop work order, debar or suspend the non-Federal entity, or take other remedies as appropriate. Questioned Costs: None. Context: The Center failed to perform and/or properly document its due diligence with respect to these requirements. The issue is considered systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend the Center implement internal controls to ensure that all vendors, contractors, and consultants are screened for suspension and debarment prior to entering into any executed contract. We further recommend that a policy be formalized and implemented that requires an annual screening of any current vendors, contractors, or consultants as well.
Criteria: As stated in 2 CFR §200.303, the non-Federal entity (i.e. the Center) must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or in the “Internal Control Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). According to 2 CFR §200.214, the non-Federal entity is subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Condition: During our audit, we noted several cases in which the Center did not perform, or did not maintain proper support to demonstrate that it performed checks via SAM.gov to ensure that potential vendors, contractors, or consultants are suspended or debarred. The failure to screen such parties increases the possibility that U.S. Government funds may inadvertently be provided to individuals or organizations deemed to be excluded by the U.S. Government. Cause: Management did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that suspension and debarment was being performed prior to entering into contracts with vendors or contractors/ consultants. Effect or Potential Effect: The Center is exposed to an increased risk that future noncompliance could occur by entering into transactions with vendors, contractors, or consultants that are suspended and debarred. Effect or Potential Effect (continued): If a non-Federal entity knowingly does business with an excluded person, the agency responsible for the Center's funding may disallow costs, annul or terminate the transaction, issue a stop work order, debar or suspend the non-Federal entity, or take other remedies as appropriate. Questioned Costs: None. Context: The Center failed to perform and/or properly document its due diligence with respect to these requirements. The issue is considered systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend the Center implement internal controls to ensure that all vendors, contractors, and consultants are screened for suspension and debarment prior to entering into any executed contract. We further recommend that a policy be formalized and implemented that requires an annual screening of any current vendors, contractors, or consultants as well.
Criteria: As stated in 2 CFR §200.303, the non-Federal entity (i.e. the Center) must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or in the “Internal Control Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). According to 2 CFR §200.214, the non-Federal entity is subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Condition: During our audit, we noted several cases in which the Center did not perform, or did not maintain proper support to demonstrate that it performed checks via SAM.gov to ensure that potential vendors, contractors, or consultants are suspended or debarred. The failure to screen such parties increases the possibility that U.S. Government funds may inadvertently be provided to individuals or organizations deemed to be excluded by the U.S. Government. Cause: Management did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that suspension and debarment was being performed prior to entering into contracts with vendors or contractors/ consultants. Effect or Potential Effect: The Center is exposed to an increased risk that future noncompliance could occur by entering into transactions with vendors, contractors, or consultants that are suspended and debarred. Effect or Potential Effect (continued): If a non-Federal entity knowingly does business with an excluded person, the agency responsible for the Center's funding may disallow costs, annul or terminate the transaction, issue a stop work order, debar or suspend the non-Federal entity, or take other remedies as appropriate. Questioned Costs: None. Context: The Center failed to perform and/or properly document its due diligence with respect to these requirements. The issue is considered systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend the Center implement internal controls to ensure that all vendors, contractors, and consultants are screened for suspension and debarment prior to entering into any executed contract. We further recommend that a policy be formalized and implemented that requires an annual screening of any current vendors, contractors, or consultants as well.
Criteria: As stated in 2 CFR §200.303, the non-Federal entity (i.e. the Center) must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or in the “Internal Control Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). According to 2 CFR §200.214, the non-Federal entity is subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Condition: During our audit, we noted several cases in which the Center did not perform, or did not maintain proper support to demonstrate that it performed checks via SAM.gov to ensure that potential vendors, contractors, or consultants are suspended or debarred. The failure to screen such parties increases the possibility that U.S. Government funds may inadvertently be provided to individuals or organizations deemed to be excluded by the U.S. Government. Cause: Management did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that suspension and debarment was being performed prior to entering into contracts with vendors or contractors/ consultants. Effect or Potential Effect: The Center is exposed to an increased risk that future noncompliance could occur by entering into transactions with vendors, contractors, or consultants that are suspended and debarred. Effect or Potential Effect (continued): If a non-Federal entity knowingly does business with an excluded person, the agency responsible for the Center's funding may disallow costs, annul or terminate the transaction, issue a stop work order, debar or suspend the non-Federal entity, or take other remedies as appropriate. Questioned Costs: None. Context: The Center failed to perform and/or properly document its due diligence with respect to these requirements. The issue is considered systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend the Center implement internal controls to ensure that all vendors, contractors, and consultants are screened for suspension and debarment prior to entering into any executed contract. We further recommend that a policy be formalized and implemented that requires an annual screening of any current vendors, contractors, or consultants as well.
Criteria: As stated in 2 CFR §200.303, the non-Federal entity (i.e. the Center) must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or in the “Internal Control Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). According to 2 CFR §200.214, the non-Federal entity is subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Condition: During our audit, we noted several cases in which the Center did not perform, or did not maintain proper support to demonstrate that it performed checks via SAM.gov to ensure that potential vendors, contractors, or consultants are suspended or debarred. The failure to screen such parties increases the possibility that U.S. Government funds may inadvertently be provided to individuals or organizations deemed to be excluded by the U.S. Government. Cause: Management did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that suspension and debarment was being performed prior to entering into contracts with vendors or contractors/ consultants. Effect or Potential Effect: The Center is exposed to an increased risk that future noncompliance could occur by entering into transactions with vendors, contractors, or consultants that are suspended and debarred. Effect or Potential Effect (continued): If a non-Federal entity knowingly does business with an excluded person, the agency responsible for the Center's funding may disallow costs, annul or terminate the transaction, issue a stop work order, debar or suspend the non-Federal entity, or take other remedies as appropriate. Questioned Costs: None. Context: The Center failed to perform and/or properly document its due diligence with respect to these requirements. The issue is considered systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend the Center implement internal controls to ensure that all vendors, contractors, and consultants are screened for suspension and debarment prior to entering into any executed contract. We further recommend that a policy be formalized and implemented that requires an annual screening of any current vendors, contractors, or consultants as well.
Criteria: As stated in 2 CFR §200.303, the non-Federal entity (i.e. the Center) must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or in the “Internal Control Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). According to 2 CFR §200.214, the non-Federal entity is subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Condition: During our audit, we noted several cases in which the Center did not perform, or did not maintain proper support to demonstrate that it performed checks via SAM.gov to ensure that potential vendors, contractors, or consultants are suspended or debarred. The failure to screen such parties increases the possibility that U.S. Government funds may inadvertently be provided to individuals or organizations deemed to be excluded by the U.S. Government. Cause: Management did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that suspension and debarment was being performed prior to entering into contracts with vendors or contractors/ consultants. Effect or Potential Effect: The Center is exposed to an increased risk that future noncompliance could occur by entering into transactions with vendors, contractors, or consultants that are suspended and debarred. Effect or Potential Effect (continued): If a non-Federal entity knowingly does business with an excluded person, the agency responsible for the Center's funding may disallow costs, annul or terminate the transaction, issue a stop work order, debar or suspend the non-Federal entity, or take other remedies as appropriate. Questioned Costs: None. Context: The Center failed to perform and/or properly document its due diligence with respect to these requirements. The issue is considered systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend the Center implement internal controls to ensure that all vendors, contractors, and consultants are screened for suspension and debarment prior to entering into any executed contract. We further recommend that a policy be formalized and implemented that requires an annual screening of any current vendors, contractors, or consultants as well.
Criteria: As stated in 2 CFR §200.303, the non-Federal entity (i.e. the Center) must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or in the “Internal Control Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). According to 2 CFR §200.214, the non-Federal entity is subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Condition: During our audit, we noted several cases in which the Center did not perform, or did not maintain proper support to demonstrate that it performed checks via SAM.gov to ensure that potential vendors, contractors, or consultants are suspended or debarred. The failure to screen such parties increases the possibility that U.S. Government funds may inadvertently be provided to individuals or organizations deemed to be excluded by the U.S. Government. Cause: Management did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that suspension and debarment was being performed prior to entering into contracts with vendors or contractors/ consultants. Effect or Potential Effect: The Center is exposed to an increased risk that future noncompliance could occur by entering into transactions with vendors, contractors, or consultants that are suspended and debarred. Effect or Potential Effect (continued): If a non-Federal entity knowingly does business with an excluded person, the agency responsible for the Center's funding may disallow costs, annul or terminate the transaction, issue a stop work order, debar or suspend the non-Federal entity, or take other remedies as appropriate. Questioned Costs: None. Context: The Center failed to perform and/or properly document its due diligence with respect to these requirements. The issue is considered systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend the Center implement internal controls to ensure that all vendors, contractors, and consultants are screened for suspension and debarment prior to entering into any executed contract. We further recommend that a policy be formalized and implemented that requires an annual screening of any current vendors, contractors, or consultants as well.
Criteria: As stated in 2 CFR §200.303, the non-Federal entity (i.e. the Center) must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or in the “Internal Control Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). According to 2 CFR §200.214, the non-Federal entity is subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Condition: During our audit, we noted several cases in which the Center did not perform, or did not maintain proper support to demonstrate that it performed checks via SAM.gov to ensure that potential vendors, contractors, or consultants are suspended or debarred. The failure to screen such parties increases the possibility that U.S. Government funds may inadvertently be provided to individuals or organizations deemed to be excluded by the U.S. Government. Cause: Management did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that suspension and debarment was being performed prior to entering into contracts with vendors or contractors/ consultants. Effect or Potential Effect: The Center is exposed to an increased risk that future noncompliance could occur by entering into transactions with vendors, contractors, or consultants that are suspended and debarred. Effect or Potential Effect (continued): If a non-Federal entity knowingly does business with an excluded person, the agency responsible for the Center's funding may disallow costs, annul or terminate the transaction, issue a stop work order, debar or suspend the non-Federal entity, or take other remedies as appropriate. Questioned Costs: None. Context: The Center failed to perform and/or properly document its due diligence with respect to these requirements. The issue is considered systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend the Center implement internal controls to ensure that all vendors, contractors, and consultants are screened for suspension and debarment prior to entering into any executed contract. We further recommend that a policy be formalized and implemented that requires an annual screening of any current vendors, contractors, or consultants as well.
Criteria: As stated in 2 CFR §200.303, the non-Federal entity (i.e. the Center) must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or in the “Internal Control Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). According to 2 CFR §200.214, the non-Federal entity is subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Condition: During our audit, we noted several cases in which the Center did not perform, or did not maintain proper support to demonstrate that it performed checks via SAM.gov to ensure that potential vendors, contractors, or consultants are suspended or debarred. The failure to screen such parties increases the possibility that U.S. Government funds may inadvertently be provided to individuals or organizations deemed to be excluded by the U.S. Government. Cause: Management did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that suspension and debarment was being performed prior to entering into contracts with vendors or contractors/ consultants. Effect or Potential Effect: The Center is exposed to an increased risk that future noncompliance could occur by entering into transactions with vendors, contractors, or consultants that are suspended and debarred. Effect or Potential Effect (continued): If a non-Federal entity knowingly does business with an excluded person, the agency responsible for the Center's funding may disallow costs, annul or terminate the transaction, issue a stop work order, debar or suspend the non-Federal entity, or take other remedies as appropriate. Questioned Costs: None. Context: The Center failed to perform and/or properly document its due diligence with respect to these requirements. The issue is considered systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend the Center implement internal controls to ensure that all vendors, contractors, and consultants are screened for suspension and debarment prior to entering into any executed contract. We further recommend that a policy be formalized and implemented that requires an annual screening of any current vendors, contractors, or consultants as well.
Criteria: As stated in 2 CFR §200.303, the non-Federal entity (i.e. the Center) must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or in the “Internal Control Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). According to 2 CFR §200.214, the non-Federal entity is subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Condition: During our audit, we noted several cases in which the Center did not perform, or did not maintain proper support to demonstrate that it performed checks via SAM.gov to ensure that potential vendors, contractors, or consultants are suspended or debarred. The failure to screen such parties increases the possibility that U.S. Government funds may inadvertently be provided to individuals or organizations deemed to be excluded by the U.S. Government. Cause: Management did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that suspension and debarment was being performed prior to entering into contracts with vendors or contractors/ consultants. Effect or Potential Effect: The Center is exposed to an increased risk that future noncompliance could occur by entering into transactions with vendors, contractors, or consultants that are suspended and debarred. Effect or Potential Effect (continued): If a non-Federal entity knowingly does business with an excluded person, the agency responsible for the Center's funding may disallow costs, annul or terminate the transaction, issue a stop work order, debar or suspend the non-Federal entity, or take other remedies as appropriate. Questioned Costs: None. Context: The Center failed to perform and/or properly document its due diligence with respect to these requirements. The issue is considered systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend the Center implement internal controls to ensure that all vendors, contractors, and consultants are screened for suspension and debarment prior to entering into any executed contract. We further recommend that a policy be formalized and implemented that requires an annual screening of any current vendors, contractors, or consultants as well.
Criteria: As stated in 2 CFR §200.303, the non-Federal entity (i.e. the Center) must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or in the “Internal Control Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). According to 2 CFR §200.214, the non-Federal entity is subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Condition: During our audit, we noted several cases in which the Center did not perform, or did not maintain proper support to demonstrate that it performed checks via SAM.gov to ensure that potential vendors, contractors, or consultants are suspended or debarred. The failure to screen such parties increases the possibility that U.S. Government funds may inadvertently be provided to individuals or organizations deemed to be excluded by the U.S. Government. Cause: Management did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that suspension and debarment was being performed prior to entering into contracts with vendors or contractors/ consultants. Effect or Potential Effect: The Center is exposed to an increased risk that future noncompliance could occur by entering into transactions with vendors, contractors, or consultants that are suspended and debarred. Effect or Potential Effect (continued): If a non-Federal entity knowingly does business with an excluded person, the agency responsible for the Center's funding may disallow costs, annul or terminate the transaction, issue a stop work order, debar or suspend the non-Federal entity, or take other remedies as appropriate. Questioned Costs: None. Context: The Center failed to perform and/or properly document its due diligence with respect to these requirements. The issue is considered systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend the Center implement internal controls to ensure that all vendors, contractors, and consultants are screened for suspension and debarment prior to entering into any executed contract. We further recommend that a policy be formalized and implemented that requires an annual screening of any current vendors, contractors, or consultants as well.
Criteria: As stated in 2 CFR §200.303, the non-Federal entity (i.e. the Center) must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or in the “Internal Control Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). According to 2 CFR §200.214, the non-Federal entity is subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Condition: During our audit, we noted several cases in which the Center did not perform, or did not maintain proper support to demonstrate that it performed checks via SAM.gov to ensure that potential vendors, contractors, or consultants are suspended or debarred. The failure to screen such parties increases the possibility that U.S. Government funds may inadvertently be provided to individuals or organizations deemed to be excluded by the U.S. Government. Cause: Management did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that suspension and debarment was being performed prior to entering into contracts with vendors or contractors/ consultants. Effect or Potential Effect: The Center is exposed to an increased risk that future noncompliance could occur by entering into transactions with vendors, contractors, or consultants that are suspended and debarred. Effect or Potential Effect (continued): If a non-Federal entity knowingly does business with an excluded person, the agency responsible for the Center's funding may disallow costs, annul or terminate the transaction, issue a stop work order, debar or suspend the non-Federal entity, or take other remedies as appropriate. Questioned Costs: None. Context: The Center failed to perform and/or properly document its due diligence with respect to these requirements. The issue is considered systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend the Center implement internal controls to ensure that all vendors, contractors, and consultants are screened for suspension and debarment prior to entering into any executed contract. We further recommend that a policy be formalized and implemented that requires an annual screening of any current vendors, contractors, or consultants as well.
Criteria: As stated in 2 CFR §200.303, the non-Federal entity (i.e. the Center) must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or in the “Internal Control Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). According to 2 CFR §200.214, the non-Federal entity is subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Condition: During our audit, we noted several cases in which the Center did not perform, or did not maintain proper support to demonstrate that it performed checks via SAM.gov to ensure that potential vendors, contractors, or consultants are suspended or debarred. The failure to screen such parties increases the possibility that U.S. Government funds may inadvertently be provided to individuals or organizations deemed to be excluded by the U.S. Government. Cause: Management did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that suspension and debarment was being performed prior to entering into contracts with vendors or contractors/ consultants. Effect or Potential Effect: The Center is exposed to an increased risk that future noncompliance could occur by entering into transactions with vendors, contractors, or consultants that are suspended and debarred. Effect or Potential Effect (continued): If a non-Federal entity knowingly does business with an excluded person, the agency responsible for the Center's funding may disallow costs, annul or terminate the transaction, issue a stop work order, debar or suspend the non-Federal entity, or take other remedies as appropriate. Questioned Costs: None. Context: The Center failed to perform and/or properly document its due diligence with respect to these requirements. The issue is considered systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend the Center implement internal controls to ensure that all vendors, contractors, and consultants are screened for suspension and debarment prior to entering into any executed contract. We further recommend that a policy be formalized and implemented that requires an annual screening of any current vendors, contractors, or consultants as well.
2022-002 - Federal Grants Management - Procurement Policy Federal Agency: Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A Pass-Through Agency: Michigan Department of Treasury Award Period: March 1, 2021 ? December 31, 2024 Type of Finding: Significant deficiency in internal control over compliance, other matters. Criteria or Specific Requirement 2 CFR Section 200.214 requires non-federal entities to follow suspension and debarment regulations outlined in 2 CFR part 180. When a nonfederal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the nonfederal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Condition The County did not perform a search for suspension and debarment for vendors the County initiated procurement transactions in excess of $25,000. Questioned Costs None Context There were six transaction that exceeded the $25,000 covered transaction threshold during the granting period and the sample size was five. During our testing, it was noted on three of the five items tested that Iron County, Michigan was not reviewing vendors prior to entering into a contract with a vendor to ensure the vendor was not on the suspended or debarred vendor list maintained by the General Services Administration. The sample was a statistically valid sample. Cause The County was not aware of the requirements under suspension and debarment. Effect The County could contract with a vendor that has been suspended or debarred from receiving federal funds. Recommendation We recommend the County use sam.gov or the ELPS listing to review clients at the beginning of the year or before a transaction is incurred in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
FINDING 2022-001 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): SLFRP2971 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the County to ensure compliance with the requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement The County's purchasing policy did not reflect applicable state laws and regulations. In addition, the policy did not include procedures to avoid acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items, or procedures to ensure that all solicitations incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the material, product, or service to be procured. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS), collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Upon inquiry of the County to review the procedures in place for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, the County divulged that it was unaware of the suspension and debarment requirements related to the SLFRF awards. A population of four covered transactions, totaling $990,897, that equaled or exceeded $25,000 paid from SLFRF funds during the audit period was identified. For each of the four transactions, the County did not verify the suspension and debarment status prior to payment due to the County not having any policies or procedures in place to verify that contractors and subrecipients were neither suspended nor debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified from participating in federal assistance programs or activities. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non- Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327." 2 CFR 200.214 states: "Non-federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities." 31 CFR 19.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the EPLS; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person if allowed by this rule; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the County. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the County's management of what should be done to effect internal control, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, vendors and subrecipients to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the provisions of Federal regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the County. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the County establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Additionally, we recommend the County establish documented procurement procedures consistent with state and local laws for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward. The nonfederal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Finding 2022-002: Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment (Significant Deficiency) Federal Program: 93.224 - U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR Section 200.214 requires that, for covered transactions, a non-Federal entity must verify that entities are not suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded. This verification may be accomplished by checking the System for Award Management (SAM) website maintained by the General Services Administration. Condition: For all disbursements tested, the Organization could not provide documentation of their verification, prior to payment, that the vendors were not suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded. Questioned Costs: $- Cause: The Organization did not require evidence of SAM checks be maintained in its vendor files. As a result, the Organization did not maintain adequate support to provide evidence that appropriate suspension and debarment searches were performed. Despite the lack of documentation, a search was performed after the fact to verify that the vendors or individuals in our sample were not suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded. Therefore, no questioned costs have been reported related to the sample that was tested. Effect or Potential Effect: The Organization was not in compliance with the procurement documentation requirements of the Uniform Guidance. As a result, the Organization could not readily provide evidence that it had assessed whether or not its vendors were suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. As a result, the potential for payments to suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded vendors and individuals exists. Recommendation: The Organization should establish internal controls to ensure proper documentation is maintained as evidence to support that the Organization performed the required suspension and debarment searches on the SAM website.
Federal Grants Management - Procurement Policy ? Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A Pass-Through Agency: Michigan Department of Treasury Award Period: March 1, 2021 ? December 31, 2024 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matter Criteria or Specific Requirement 2 CFR Section 200.214 requires non-federal entities to follow suspension and debarment regulations outlined in 2 CFR part 180. When a nonfederal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the nonfederal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Condition The County did not perform a search for suspension and debarment for vendors the County initiated procurement transactions in excess of $25,000. Questioned Costs None Context There were five transactions that exceeded the $25,000 covered transaction threshold during the granting period. During our testing, it was noted on all five items tested that Dickinson County, Michigan was not reviewing vendors prior to entering into a contract with a vendor to ensure the vendor was not on the suspended or debarred vendor list maintained by the General Services Administration. Cause The County was not aware of the requirements under suspension and debarment. Effect The County could contract with a vendor that has been suspended or debarred from receiving federal funds. Recommendation We recommend the County use sam.gov or the ELPS listing to review clients at the beginning of the year or before a transaction is incurred in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
FINDING 2022-004 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): FY2022 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The County elected to receive the standard revenue loss allowance, allowing the County to claim its total State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) allocation of $8,688,084 as revenue loss to use for government services. As such, all SLFRF program funds were expended under the revenue loss eligible use category. The Department of the Treasury (Treasury) determined that there are no subawards under this eligible use category, and that recipients' use of revenue loss funds would not give rise to subrecipient relationships given that there is no federal program or purpose to carry out in the case of the revenue loss portion of the award. Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with SLFRF award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS), collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Due to the Treasury's determination that the revenue loss eligible use category does not give rise to subawards, the County was only required to comply with suspension and debarment requirements related to covered transactions. Upon inquiry of the County in order to review the procedures in place for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, the County divulged that they were unaware of the suspension and debarment requirements related to the SLFRF awards. One covered transaction paid on the County's Build-Operate-Transfer agreement that equaled or exceeded $25,000 was identified. The one transaction, totaling $5,096,841, during the audit period, was selected for testing. For the noted transaction, the County did not verify the vendor's suspension and debarment status prior to payment due to the County not having any policies or procedures in place to verify that contractors were neither suspended nor debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified from participating in federal assistance programs or activities. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.214 states in part: "Non-Federal entities and contractors are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations . . . restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities." 31 CFR 19.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the EPLS; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person if allowed by this rule; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the County. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the County's management of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the County. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the County establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
2022-003 - Controls over Suspension and Debarment Finding Type: Material Weakness over Federal Awards Programs: Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities (Assistance Listing Number 10.760) Criteria: Per 2 CFR ? 200.214 Suspension and debarment: Non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Condition/Finding: The Village had no controls in place, as required by the Uniform Guidance, to ensure that all parties that the Village enters into covered transactions with are eligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities. However, during our testing, we found that all covered transactions entered into by the Village were with eligible parties. Cause: The Village did not have written policies and procedures over procurement, including suspension and debarment, as required by the Uniform Guidance. Effect: As a result of this condition, the Village had increased risk of inadvertently entering into a covered transaction with an ineligible party. Questioned Costs: No costs have been questioned as a result of this finding. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Village Council and management adopt, and follow, written policies and procedures (that conform with requirements of the Uniform Guidance) to ensure that future contracts are properly documented and awarded in a manner that documents that the Village verified all parties under covered transactions are eligible for participation in federal programs or activities. View of Responsible Officials (Corrective Action): See corrective action plan.
FINDING 2022-006 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): OMB Approved No 1505-0271 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context The County elected to receive the standard revenue loss allowance, allowing the County to claim up to $10 million of its total State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) allocation of $4,637,050 as revenue loss to use for government services. As such, all SLFRF program funds expended in 2022 were under the revenue loss eligible use category. The Department of the Treasury (Treasury) determined that there are no subawards under this eligible use category, and that recipients' use of revenue loss funds would not give rise to subrecipient relationships given that there is no federal program or purpose to carry out in the case of the revenue loss portion of the award. Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with SLFRF award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS), collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Due to the Treasury's determination that the revenue loss eligible use category does not give rise to subawards, the County was only required to comply with suspension and debarment requirements related to contracts. The County's policies related to SLFRF suspension and debarment requirements were as follows: for all vendor procurement contracts a suspension and debarment clause was included; however, if the purchase is expected to exceed $25,000, but not require a procurement contract, then a certification is requested from the vendor. In the event a certification is not provided by the vendor, the County Auditor checks the SAMs exclusions. Of the six transactions that equaled or exceeded $25,000 that were paid from SLFRF funds during the audit period, two were selected for testing to verify the County followed its procedures related to suspension and debarment. One transaction in the amount of $118,840 was made for the purchase of communications equipment. The contract between the vendor and the County included a suspension and debarment clause. The second transaction selected for testing in the amount of $33,170 was made to repair/replace the drain. A formal contract was not required and was not entered into with the vendor. However, proof of a certification from the vendor, or a SAMs exclusion check by the County could not be provided for audit. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.214 states in part: "Non-federal entities and contractors are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations . . . restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities." 31 CFR 19.300 states in part: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the EPLS; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person if allowed by this rule; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause The system of internal controls as established by management of the County was not properly implemented to ensure that the policies and procedures in place related to suspension and debarment were appropriately followed. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the County. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the County establish a proper system of internal controls, including strengthening its policies and procedures to ensure its compliance with requirements related to suspension and debarment. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-002 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): FY 2022 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The County elected to receive the standard revenue loss allowance, allowing them to claim its total State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) allocation of $6,597,109 as revenue loss to use for government services. As such, all SLFRF program funds to date were expended under the revenue loss eligible use category. The Department of the Treasury (Treasury) determined that there are no subawards under this eligible use category, and that recipients' use of revenue loss funds would not give rise to subrecipient relationships given that there is no federal program or purpose to carry out in the case of the revenue loss portion of the award. Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with SLFRF award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to contracts for goods and services awarded under procurement and non-procurement transactions (i.e. grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties List System, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Due to Treasury's determination that the revenue loss eligible use category does not give rise to subawards, the County was only required to comply with suspension and debarment requirements related to covered transactions. Upon inquiry of the County's policies and procedures related to suspension and debarment requirements, the County divulged that they did not have policies or procedures in place for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified from participating in federal assistance programs or activities. Two covered transactions for goods or services that equaled or exceeded $25,000 that were paid from SLFRF funds during the audit period were identified. Each transaction was examined to determine whether the County verified the suspension and debarment status of either vendor prior to payment. The first covered transaction in the amount of $77,764 was made to a contractor for the preparation of the County's SLFRF financial plan. The contract, as provided by the contractor included a clause stating they were neither excluded nor disqualified. Although the contract was signed by a County official, the contract was not appropriately reviewed by the County to ensure the suspension and debarment clause was included prior to signing. The second covered transaction in the amount of $227,253 was made for the purchase of police radios and associated accessories, as well as for the installation of the equipment. The County was unable to provide documentation to support whether the County verified the vendor's suspension and debarment status prior to issuing payment. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. The noncompliance was isolated to the second covered transaction as noted above. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.214 states: "Non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities." 31 CFR 19.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the EPLS; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person if allowed by this rule; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the County. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the County's management of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the County. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the County establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. We also recommended that supporting documentation be retained in order to be presented for audit. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Finding 2022-002: Procurement Suspension and Debarment U.S. Department of Health and Human Services ? Assistance listing No. 93.526, Grants for Capital Development in Health Centers, award number C8ECS44745. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR section 200.214, Suspension and Debarment, ?The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities.? Condition: FMCS did not have evidence of verification that vendors are not suspended or debarred from federal and/or state contracts. Cause: FMCS has a procurement policy which indicates ?Certain contracts will not be made to parties listed on the nonprocurement portion of the General Services Administration?s `List of Parties Excluded from Federal Procurement or Nonprocurement Programs? in accordance with Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, `Debarment and Suspension.? (See 45 C.F.R. Part 76). This list contains the names of parties debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded by agencies, and contractors declared ineligible under statutory authority other than E.O. 12549.? However, there is no evidence this policy was followed during 2022 for vendors/contractors engaged. Effect: FMCS has not documented that it performed required verification. Questioned Costs: Unknown Context: FMCS?s procurement policy specifies contracts will not be awarded to ?parties listed on the nonprocurement portion of the General Services Administration?s `List of Parties Excluded from Federal Procurement or Nonprocurement Programs? in accordance with Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, `Debarment and Suspension??. The request for evidence of verification that vendors were not suspended or disbarred was not provided prior to conclusion of the audit. Repeat Finding: Yes, 2021-001. Recommendation: FMCS should provide training on procurement policy and update policy to include retention of support for compliance with policy.View of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: FMCS concurs with the finding and recommendation of the auditor. The reason this is a repeat finding is because this finding occurred on the 2020 audit, which was completed February 1, 2022. (a three-year period). Our response to the finding was "The procurement policy will be revised to include retention of support for compliance before the March board meeting. Training on our procurement policy will be provided by March 31, 2022". The policy was revised and presented to and approved by the board of directors at the March 16, 2022, meeting. The training occurred for the human resources (HR) staff, who are charged with performing the compliance check, in March. The policy was implemented in March 2022.
2022 ? 001 Federal Agencies: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Names: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Pass-Through Agency: Direct Award and Wisconsin Department of Health Services Award Period: March 2020 through December 31, 2024 Type of Finding: ? Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: Per 2 CFR Part 200 Section 200.214 - Non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Condition: During our testing, we noted the City of Wauwatosa did not have adequate internal controls designed to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred. Questioned costs: None Context: For 1 of the 1 vendors, with in the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund program, selected for testing, the City did not verify and retain documentation of the verification for any that vendors were not suspended or debared by the Federal Government. The auditor noted no instances of noncompliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment; however, the lack of internal controls over these compliance requirements provides an opportunity for noncompliance. Cause: The City had not designed and implemented controls related to the verification and documentation of vendor's status as not suspended or debarred with the Federal Government. Effect: The lack of internal controls over these compliance requirements provides an opportunity for noncompliance. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat finding of 2021-001. Recommendation: We recommend the City of Wauwatosa design controls to ensure an adequate review process is in place to review potential contractors to determine they are not suspended or debarred. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.