Program: COVID-19 - Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Disease (ELC) Assistance Listing No.: 93.323 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Passed-through: California Department of Public Health Award No.: COVID-19ELC114 Award Year: 2021 Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Type of Finding: Material Weakness and Instance of Noncompliance Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303(a), Internal Controls, states that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Title 2 CFR Section 200.214 of the Uniform Guidance states that the County must comply with 2 CFR part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Per 2 CFR Section 180.300, when a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) and available at https://www.sam.gov/SAM/, (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity. Condition: For three (3) out of three (3) contracts tested, we noted that there was no evidence the County verified that the contracted entities were not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in federal programs prior to entering into the contract. Cause: The County did not have adequate internal controls in place to ensure vendor eligibility was verified and documented prior to contract execution, resulting in a lack of evidence supporting compliance with suspension and debarment requirements. Effect: As a result of this condition, the County was not able to demonstrate compliance with Uniform Guidance procurement requirements, increasing the risk that federal funds could be awarded to ineligible vendors. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of three (3) out of twelve (12) contracts were tested. Repeat Finding from Prior Years: No. Recommendation: We recommend the County enhance internal controls over procurement to ensure verification and documentation of vendor eligibility related to suspension and debarment are performed prior to contract execution, in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees. See separately issued Corrective Action Plan.
Finding 2025-001 Internal control deficiency and noncompliance over procurement and suspension and debarment. Identification of the federal program: Assistance Listing Number 93.493: • Congressional Directives • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services • Federal award identification number – CE146487 • Federal award year – 7/1/2024 – 6/30/2025 • Pass-through entity – The Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center • Pass-through entity identifying numbers: H79FG000747 and H79FG001034 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation): Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart D, 200.303, Internal controls: The non-Federal entity must (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government,” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart D, 200.318, General procurement standards: (a) the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity’s documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 200.317 through 200.327; (b) non-Federal entities must maintain oversight to ensure that contractors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of their contracts or purchase orders; (c) (1) the non-Federal entity must maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award, and administration of contracts. Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart D, 200.318, General procurement standards: (i) the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart D, 200.319, Competition: (a) All procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of this section and 200.320. Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart D, 200.320, Methods of procurement to be followed: The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award: (a) (2) Small purchases – (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity; (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate –(1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price; (2) Proposals. A procurement method in which either a fixed price or cost-reimbursement type contract is awarded. Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart D, 200.320, Methods of procurement to be followed: (c) Noncompetitive procurement. There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold; (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart D, 200.324, Contract cost and price: (a) The non-Federal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold, including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent on the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation, but, as a starting point, the non-Federal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals. Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart C 200.214, Suspension and debarment: Non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations that restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter I, Part 180, Subpart C 180.300: What must I do before I enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier? When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by (a) checking SAM Exclusions; (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Condition: During our testing over procurement, we observed management did not have documented procurement procedures that conformed to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR section 200.318 to 200.327 and written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award, and administration of contracts. Management did not have internal controls in place over procurements to ensure price or rate quotations were obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources, formal procurements to ensure sealed bids or proposals were obtained through public advertising, and completion of a cost or price analysis in connection with all procurement actions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold. Management did not maintain records for procurements to document the history of procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, during our testing over suspension and debarment, we observed management did not retain support for internal control documentation for all vendors, evidencing that the vendors were searched for suspension and debarment upon entering into a contract supported with federal funds. Cause: Management did not have internal controls in place over the compliance requirements as stated in the criteria or specific requirement section above. Effect or potential effect: Procurements were not supported by internal controls and could potentially include unreasonable prices or rates. In addition, if a search for suspension and debarment is not conducted, the entity could contract with vendors that are suspended or debarred. Questioned costs: $1,385,165 – Assistance Listing Number 93.493 Federal award identification number – CE146487 Pass-through entity identifying numbers: H79FG000747 and H79FG001034 Questioned costs were computed as all procurements selected for testing. Questioned costs for each award are as follows: • CE146487: $60,874 • H79FG000747: $119,479 • H79FG001034: $1,204,812 Questioned costs means an amount, expended or received from a Federal award, that (1) is noncompliant or suspected noncompliant with Federal statutes, regulations, or the terms and conditions of the Federal award or (2) at the time of the audit, lacked adequate documentation to support compliance. Context: During our testing over procurements, we selected five vendors for testing with total expenditures of $1,385,165 from a population of procurements totaling $1,425,361, subject to formal procurement procedures. We observed management did not have internal controls in place to ensure the compliance requirements as stated in the criteria or specific requirement section above were performed for any of the five procurements selected for testing. For suspension and debarment, we selected five vendors for testing totaling $1,385,165. Management was unable to provide documentation that internal controls were executed for any of the vendors selected for testing. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: Management should create documented procurement procedures that conform to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR section 200.318 through 200.327 and written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award, and administration of contracts. Management should develop and implement internal controls over procurements to ensure price or rate quotations are obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources, formal procurements to ensure sealed bids or proposals are obtained through public advertising, and completion of a cost or price analysis in connection with all procurement actions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold. Management should maintain records for procurements to document the history of procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Management should create documented suspension and debarment procedures and develop and implement internal controls to ensure vendors were searched for suspension and debarment at the time of awarding a contract supported by federal funding and retain evidence supporting such procedures. Management should review the procurements identified as questioned costs to identify if any improper payments were made to the entity. Views of responsible officials: We agree with the finding that internal controls were not sufficient to maintain compliance with federal procurement standards under Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart D, 200.318 to 200.327 for a non-federal entity. However, the funds were expended for the intended purpose of the federal award. The Company is committed to implementing internal controls to ensure procurement related to federal awards follow 2 CFR section 200.318 to 200.327. The Company will update the procurement policy to ensure it complies with the requirements of 2 CFR section 200.318 through 200.327, which includes the written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest, governing the actions of its employees who select, award, and administer procurement contracts. This policy will include procedures to ensure proper procurement for purchases to ensure sufficient price quotations are obtained from the required number of qualified sources, proper sealed bids or proposals are obtained through public advertising, an appropriate cost or price analysis is performed for procurement actions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, documentation is retained, and proper oversight is exercised to demonstrate compliance with 2 CFR section 200.318 through 200.327.
Finding Number: 2025-009 State/Educational Agency(s): Arkansas Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: Not Applicable AL Number(s) and Program Title(s): 21.027 – COVID 19: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Federal Award Number(s): SLFRP3627 Federal Award Year(s): 2021 Compliance Requirement(s) Affected: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Noncompliance and Significant Deficiency Repeat Finding: Not applicable Criteria: 2 CFR § 200.214 holds entities subject to 2 CFR Part 180, which restricts awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities. Condition and Context: The Agency is responsible for ensuring that entities receiving awards are registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) database and have not been suspended or debarred. Registration must occur prior to the issuance of a contract or grant agreement. ALA staff reviewed 13 unique entity identifiers to determine if the Agency was in compliance with the requirement. The Agency failed to ensure two vendors, with agreements executed between September 2024 and October 2024, were registered with SAM prior to the Agency’s issuance of subawards to them. Statistically Valid Sample: Not a statistically valid sample. Questioned Costs: None Cause: The Agency failed to adhere to documented internal control procedures and did not provide oversight to ensure vendors receiving federal funding were monitored to determine federal exclusion. Effect: Failure to develop, document, and implement procedures for internal control over compliance increases risk for issuance of contracts and grant agreements to excluded or ineligible entities. Recommendation: ALA staff recommend the Agency strengthen internal controls by developing, documenting, and establishing policies to ensure contracts and grant agreements are only issued to eligible entities. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: During the audit, it was noted that for a federally funded contract exceeding $25,000, documentation was not maintained to demonstrate that the vendor was verified as not suspended or debarred through Sam.gov as required by ADE policy and federal regulation. We acknowledge that the required verification was not documented. This occurrence was an oversight in our internal contract review process and a lack of standardized checklist to ensure verification was completed and retained. Upon identification of this finding, we have taken the following corrective action: 1. Immediate corrective action: We are working with the identified vendors to register in Sam.gov. 2. Process Improvement: Documentation of Sam.gov verification will be printed/saved and added to the contract file for all contracts using federal funds over $25,000. 3. Training: Relevant staff responsible for procurement and contract management have been trained in federal suspension and debarment requirements and ADE policy. DESE is committed to full compliance with federal requirements and ADE policy. These corrective actions are designed to ensure that suspension and debarment verification is consistently performed and properly documented for all applicable federally funded contracts going forward. Anticipated Completion Date: Completed. Contact Person: Greg Rogers Chief Fiscal Officer DESE 4 Capitol Mall, Room 204-A Little Rock, AR 72201 (501) 682-4475 Greg.Rogers@ade.arkansas.gov
2025-002 U.S. Department of the Treasury Direct Award and Passed through Bristol County, Massachusetts COVID-19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds – ALN 21.027 Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance and Compliance Finding Criteria: Per 2 CFR section 200.214, non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. Condition: Suspension and debarment compliance was not verified for nine covered transactions. Cause: Lack of appropriate oversight resulted in required suspension and debarment checks not being performed. Effect: Grant transactions are not supported adequately, and the Town is at risk of awarding contracts to vendors not eligible to participate in federal awards programs. It was determined that none of the vendors were suspended or debarred from federal awards. Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No. Recommendation: The Town should implement procedures to document that all contractors under covered transactions that are performing services for the grant are not suspended or debarred. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding.
Criteria Non-Federal entities are prohibited from entering into covered transactions with parties that are suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participation in Federal assistance programs in accordance with 2 CFR Part 180, as adopted by Federal agencies. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.214 requires non-Federal entities to ensure that Federal awards are not made to parties listed as excluded in the System for Award Management (SAM). The Compliance Supplement further requires non-Federal entities to establish and maintain effective internal controls to provide reasonable assurance that vendors involved in covered transactions under Federal awards are properly screened and verified for eligibility prior to entering into such transactions. Condition The College did not have an updated suspension and debarment policy or established procedures in place to ensure that vendors utilized in federally funded R&D transactions were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participation in Federal programs. Although management was able to locate a suspension and debarment policy, management indicated that the policy was outdated and not followed in practice. As a result, the College did not consistently perform or document verification internal control procedures to confirm vendor eligibility through SAM prior to entering into covered transactions under Federal awards during the audit period. There were no instances of noncompliance identified in our sample of 4. Cause The condition occurred because the College did not maintain effective internal controls or current procedures to ensure compliance with Federal suspension and debarment requirements. Specifically, although a policy existed, it was outdated and not implemented in practice. In addition, the College did not establish a formal process to routinely verify and document vendor eligibility for covered transactions under Federal awards. Possible Asserted Affect Failure to establish and maintain effective controls over suspension and debarment may cause the College to enter into transactions with vendors that are suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participation in Federal programs. This condition may result in noncompliance with 2 CFR Part 180, 2 CFR 200.214, and the Procurement, Suspension and Debarment requirements of the OMB Compliance Supplement for the R&D Cluster, and limits the College’s ability to demonstrate compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of Federal awards. Questioned Costs No questioned costs were identified. Statistical Sampling The sample was not intended to be, and was not a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding The conditions found do not constitute a repeat finding from the prior year. Recommendation We recommend that the College update and formally implement its suspension and debarment policy to ensure it is current, aligns with applicable Federal regulations, and is followed in practice. Specifically, the College should establish and document procedures to require verification of vendor eligibility through the System for Award Management (SAM) prior to entering into covered transactions under Federal awards. Additionally, the College should ensure that such verification procedures are performed consistently, documented appropriately, and retained to demonstrate compliance with 2 CFR Part 180, 2 CFR 200.214, and the Procurement, Suspension and Debarment requirements of the OMB Compliance Supplement for the R&D Cluster. Management should also consider periodic monitoring or review of these procedures to ensure ongoing compliance with Federal award requirements. Views of Responsible Officials The College concurs with this finding. To mitigate the risk of entering into covered transactions with suspended or debarred vendors, the College is updating and formalizing its suspension and debarment policy, establishing procedures to require and document SAM verification prior to covered transactions under Federal awards, and implementing periodic monitoring to ensure these procedures are performed consistently. These corrective actions are being implemented in fiscal year 2026.
NONCOMPLIANCE WITH PROCUREMENT AND SUSPENSION AND DEBARMENT REQUIREMENTS, CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS, ASSISTANCE LISTING No. 21.027, Direct Allocation, AM-23-0256, AM-23-0255, YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2025 Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.214, non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement, debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Condition: The city did not comply with the procurement standards outlined in 2 CFR §200.318-§200.327, which require competitive procurement processes and verification that contractors are not suspended or debarred. Specifically, the city did not verify the eligibility of program recipients/participants/contractors through the System for Award Management (SAM) or equivalent documentation in order to verify that they were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participation in the program. Cause: The city does not have procurement policies and procedures in place that allow it to comply with procurement standards outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Non-compliance with program terms and conditions. Questioned costs: None. Recommendation: Management should develop procedures that will provide reasonable assurance that procurement of goods and services are made in compliance with applicable federal regulations and other procurement requirements specific to a federal award or subaward, and that no subaward, contract, or agreement for purchase of goods or services is made with any suspended or debarred party. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.
2025-001 – Suspension and Debarment Cluster: Research and Development Grantor: Social Security Administration, National Science Foundation Award Name: Center for Retirement Research at Boston College and Affiliated Institutions: Retirement and Disability Research Consortium, Building a Youth-Led Learning Community through Automating Hydroponic Systems, Empowering Youth in STEM and Technological Careers through AI-Enhanced Sustainable and Community-Focused Urban Gardening Award Number: 6 RDR23000010, 2048994, 2241766 Award Year: FY2025 Assistance Listing Numbers: 96.007, 47.076, 47.076 Assistance Listing Titles: Social Security Research and Demonstration; STEM Education (formerly Education and Human Resources) Pass-Through Entities: None - Direct Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.214, when entering into a covered transaction with an entity, the auditee must have established procedures to verify that the entity is not suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Condition: For 1 of 25 new vendors sampled, the vendor was not included in the ongoing suspension and debarment monitoring process, which is performed via a third-party servicer. Upon further discussion with the University, it was determined that the selected vendor was part of one day where a total of an additional 24 new vendors were also excluded from the ongoing process. Of the 25 total vendors, 3 of these vendors incurred expenditures related to federal awards totaling approximately $7,000 during the fiscal year. Cause: There was a system failure on one specific day between the University and the third-party servicer that prevented the suspension and debarment checks from being performed on new vendors. After the system failure, University personnel did not confirm that new vendors that were intended to be added on the date in question, were in fact added to the system. Effect: New vendors were not checked for suspension and debarment prior to the University entering into a transaction with the affected vendors. Questioned Costs: None noted. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: PwC recommends cross training of individuals responsible for the daily system interactions with the third-party servicer to ensure any system issues are promptly resolved and new vendors are checked for suspension and debarment prior to the University entering into a transaction with them. Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan: Management’s response is included in Management's Views and Corrective Action Plan included at the end of this report after the Schedule of Status of Prior Audit Findings.
Congressional Grants – Suspension and Debarment: Information on Federal Program: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Congressional Grant (Federal Assistance Listing Number 14.251). Criteria: 2 CFR Section 200.214 stipulates that no awards, subawards, or contracts be awarded to parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Statement of Condition: During our discussions with management, we noted that the Organization is not verifying the eligibility of vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs on an annual basis. Statement of Cause: The Organization did not review compliance requirements related to procurement outlined in 2 CFR Section 200.214. Statement of Effect: The Organization is not in compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.214. The Organization is not performing required procedures, as a result, vendors that are not eligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities could be selected or the Organization could be overpaying for goods and services. Questioned Costs: None. Perspective Information: As part of the required procurement testing, a review of the vendor charged to the Congressional grant and therefore represented purchases with federal dollars was performed. The vendor was not suspended or debarred from participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization review the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.214 and ensure that their procurement procedures are being followed and that a review of the eligibility of potential vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs or activities is performed prior to disbursing funds to the vendor. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The Capital District YMCA reviewed the vendor used for our project when the auditors brought this to our attention and we did not find any suspension or disbarment information. We will incorporate this vendor review into our process for all programs or activities related to Federal contracts. This will be done in conjunction with the procurement policy and be in place by July 31, 2025.
Congressional Grants – Suspension and Debarment: Information on Federal Program: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Congressional Grant (Federal Assistance Listing Number 14.251). Criteria: 2 CFR Section 200.214 stipulates that no awards, subawards, or contracts be awarded to parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Statement of Condition: During our discussions with management, we noted that the Organization is not verifying the eligibility of vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs on an annual basis. Statement of Cause: The Organization did not review compliance requirements related to procurement outlined in 2 CFR Section 200.214. Statement of Effect: The Organization is not in compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.214. The Organization is not performing required procedures, as a result, vendors that are not eligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities could be selected or the Organization could be overpaying for goods and services. Questioned Costs: None. Perspective Information: As part of the required procurement testing, a review of the vendor charged to the Congressional grant and therefore represented purchases with federal dollars was performed. The vendor was not suspended or debarred from participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization review the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.214 and ensure that their procurement procedures are being followed and that a review of the eligibility of potential vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs or activities is performed prior to disbursing funds to the vendor. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The Capital District YMCA reviewed the vendor used for our project when the auditors brought this to our attention and we did not find any suspension or disbarment information. We will incorporate this vendor review into our process for all programs or activities related to Federal contracts. This will be done in conjunction with the procurement policy and be in place by July 31, 2025.
Federal Program: 93.493 – Congressional Directives, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, FAIN CE152180 passed through the Health Resources & Services Administration Criteria or Specific Requirement: Procurement, Suspension & Debarment, 2 CFR 200.320 Condition: The Company paid funds to a vendor that qualified under sole source procurement requirements. In the vendor’s contract with the Company, the vendor confirmed it was not suspended or debarred. The Company did not document its process for determining sole source procurement or document its search to confirm the vendor was not suspended or debarred. Cause: The Company does not have policies in place that comply with federal procurement, suspension and debarment requirements. Effect: The Company’s internal controls did not ensure proper documentation that the vendor materially complied with the federal procurement requirements. Questioned Costs: None Context: Federal procurement standards require entities that receive federal awards to have specific policies that comply with 2 CFR Section 200.318-320. The requirements specify that policies must establish thresholds and procedures for micro-purchases, simplified acquisitions, and formal purchases. When vendors are selected, federal funds are prohibited from going to certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from receiving or participating in federal awards (2 CFR 200.214). The Company did not have policies in place to ensure compliance with these federal procurement guidelines. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: The Company has policies for vendor qualification in place surrounding critical vendors. We recommend considering all vendors that are awarded contracts to be paid with federal awards critical or otherwise amending the Company’s contracting review process or critical vendor policy to incorporate specific procedures when federal funds are used. These procedures should include a documented search of Sam.gov for suspension and debarment of the vendor. The Company should establish procurement thresholds and specific procedures for those thresholds as outlined in 2 CFR Section 200.318-320. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions – Management agrees with the finding. See attached corrective action plan.
Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §180 and §200.214, non-federal entities are prohibited from entering into covered transactions with parties that are suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participation in federal programs. Entities must verify that contractors and subcontractors are not excluded by checking the System for Award Management (SAM.gov) prior to awarding contracts funded by federal awards. Condition and Context: During our audit of procurement activities under the Health Center Infrastructure Support federal award, we identified multiple instances where the entity failed to verify the suspension and debarment status of vendors prior to awarding contracts exceeding the $25,000 threshold. Documentation of verification through SAM.gov or equivalent methods was not available for these transactions. Subsequent review of SAM.gov indicated no instances of suspended or debarred vendors being used on the project funded with federal awards. Effect: Failure to verify vendor eligibility increases the risk of awarding federal funds to ineligible parties, which may result in questioned costs, reputational harm, and potential disallowance of expenditures by the federal awarding agency. Cause: While the Center’s formal policies dictate that procedures will be followed to ensure the above criteria are met, staff responsible for procurement were unaware of the verification requirement or did not consistently apply it. Recommendation: We recommend the entity ensure that staff involved with procuring contracts using federal awards are aware of the federal requirement, including the already-established policies that the Center has regarding such requirements. Staff involved in procurement should receive training on federal suspension and debarment requirements to ensure consistent compliance.
2025-004 Lack of Documentation for SAM.gov Exclusion Checks. Type: Material Weakness. Condition: The Village did not retain documentation to support that exclusion checks were performed on SAM.gov for vendors and subrecipients associated with the Water and Waste Disposal Systems For Rural Communities program. As a result, there is no evidence that the entity verified whether these parties were suspended or debarred prior to entering covered transactions. Criteria: Per 2 CFR 180.300 and 200.214 of the Uniform Guidance, non-federal entities must verify that contractors and subrecipients are not suspended or debarred before awarding federal funds. Acceptable methods include: - Checking the SAM.gov exclusion list, - Collecting a certification from the entity, - Including a clause in the contract or agreement. - Documentation of the verification process must be retained to demonstrate compliance. Cause: The entity did not have a formal process in place to ensure that SAM.gov checks were performed and documented prior to awarding federal funds. Effect: Without documented verification, there is a risk that federal funds could be awarded to ineligible parties, potentially resulting in noncompliance with federal regulations and exposure to questioned costs or future audit findings. Questioned Costs: n/a. Recommendation: We recommend that the Village implement and enforce procedures to: - Perform SAM.gov exclusion checks prior to awarding federal funds, - Retain screenshots or other documentation as evidence of the checks, - Train relevant staff on compliance requirements under Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the auditor’s finding regarding the lack of verification against the System for Award Management (SAM.gov) prior to entering into agreements with subrecipients and contractors under federal awards. We acknowledge that conducting these checks is a critical control to ensure compliance with federal regulations and to prevent engagement with suspended or debarred entities. The omission was due to a gap in our internal procedures, and we are taking immediate corrective action. Management is implementing a formal policy requiring SAM.gov verification for all applicable transactions, and staff will be trained on the updated procedures. We are also exploring automated solutions to ensure consistent documentation and compliance moving forward. We appreciate the auditor’s observation and remain committed to strengthening our internal controls and ensuring full compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements.
2025-005 Suspension and Debarment Program Information Federal Organization U.S Department of Health and Human Services Assistance Listing Numbers 93.224 & 93.527 Health Center Program Cluster Award Numbers H80CS00513, H8FCS41684 Criteria [ ] Compliance Finding [ ] Significant Deficiency [X] Material Weakness Title 2 CFR 200.214 and Title 2 CFR 180.300 require that organizations “verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified” before entering into covered transaction (procurement contracts, purchase orders or agreements greater than or equal to $25,000) with persons or vendors. Condition The Organization entered into covered transactions without verification that vendors/contractors were not excluded from doing business with the federal government. This finding appears to be a systemic problem Cause The Organization did not follow its policy to verify that persons or entities contracted with were not listed on the exclusions list prior to entering into the contracts or purchase agreements. Effect The Organization may have entered into covered transactions with persons who have been suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs None noted. Context Out of four covered transactions selected, only one included evidence that an exclusion check was performed prior to signing the contract. Exclusions checks were performed after documentation was requested by the auditor and no excluded vendors were identified. Recommendation We recommend the Organization implement controls requiring that exclusion checks be performed prior to signing any contracts or purchase orders or agreements that are covered transactions. This exclusion check should be maintained as part of the supporting documentation for the expenditure. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action Management is in agreement with this finding and will take corrective action as outlined below.
2025-005 Suspension and Debarment Program Information Federal Organization U.S Department of Health and Human Services Assistance Listing Numbers 93.224 & 93.527 Health Center Program Cluster Award Numbers H80CS00513, H8FCS41684 Criteria [ ] Compliance Finding [ ] Significant Deficiency [X] Material Weakness Title 2 CFR 200.214 and Title 2 CFR 180.300 require that organizations “verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified” before entering into covered transaction (procurement contracts, purchase orders or agreements greater than or equal to $25,000) with persons or vendors. Condition The Organization entered into covered transactions without verification that vendors/contractors were not excluded from doing business with the federal government. This finding appears to be a systemic problem Cause The Organization did not follow its policy to verify that persons or entities contracted with were not listed on the exclusions list prior to entering into the contracts or purchase agreements. Effect The Organization may have entered into covered transactions with persons who have been suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs None noted. Context Out of four covered transactions selected, only one included evidence that an exclusion check was performed prior to signing the contract. Exclusions checks were performed after documentation was requested by the auditor and no excluded vendors were identified. Recommendation We recommend the Organization implement controls requiring that exclusion checks be performed prior to signing any contracts or purchase orders or agreements that are covered transactions. This exclusion check should be maintained as part of the supporting documentation for the expenditure. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action Management is in agreement with this finding and will take corrective action as outlined below.
Finding 2024-001: Suspension and Debarment (Significant Deficiency) Information on the Federal Program: 93.048 Criteria: According to 2 CFR §200.30, the non-Federal entity (i.e. the Organization) must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or in the "Internal Control Integrated Framework" issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). According to 2 CFR §200.214, the non-Federal entity is subject to to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Condition: The Organization failed to perform and/or properly document its due diligence with respect to these requirements. Cause: The Organization experienced turnover during the year, resulting in inconsistency and oversight of the compliance requirement. Effect or Potential Effect: The Organization is exposed to an increased risk that future noncompliance could occur by entering into transactions with vendors, contractors, or consultants that are suspended and debarred. If a non-Federal entity knowingly does business with an excluded person, the agency responsible for the Center's funding may disallow costs, annul or terminate the transaction, issue a stop work order, debar or suspend the non-Federal entity, or take other remedies as appropriate. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: During our audit, we noted two cases our of nine samples in which the Organization did not perform or did not maintain proper support to demonstrate that it performed checks via SAM.gov to ensure that potential vendors, contractors, or consultants are suspended or debarred. The failure to screen such parties increases the possibility that U.S. Government funds may inadvertently be provided to individuals or organizations deemed to be excluded by the U.S. Government. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization implement internal controls to ensure that all vendors, contractors, and consultants are screened for suspension and debarment prior to entering into any executed contract. We further recommend that a policy be formalized and implemented that requires an annual screening of any current vendors, contractors, or consultants as well.
Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Federal agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Program: Continuation of the National Evaluations System for Health Technology Coordinating Center Assistance listing number: 93.103 Federal award identification number and year: • 2U01FD006292-06 2024 • 3U01FD006292-06S1 2023 Criteria: 2 CFR 200.318 states non-federal entities must have and use documented procurement procedures that conform to 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR 200.214 states non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Order 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR Part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. 2 CFR 200 requires adequate documentation of compliance with 2 CFR 200.214. Condition and context: The Organization established policies and procedures over suspension and debarment, including checking all vendors against the government suspension and debarment listing. The policies and procedures for suspension and debarment were being followed however the evidence of the search on sam.gov was not retained. A sample of five vendors with a total contract value of $8,528,526 was selected from a population of twelve. Cause: The Organization’s management did not retain evidence of compliance with the above criteria regarding suspension and debarment due to oversight. Effect: The Organization’s documentation was lacking evidence of tracking vendors for suspension and debarment. Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management updates its policies and procedures to ensure adequate supporting documentation of suspension and debarment verification is maintained. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Federal agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Program: Continuation of the National Evaluations System for Health Technology Coordinating Center Assistance listing number: 93.103 Federal award identification number and year: • 2U01FD006292-06 2024 • 3U01FD006292-06S1 2023 Criteria: 2 CFR 200.318 states non-federal entities must have and use documented procurement procedures that conform to 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR 200.214 states non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Order 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR Part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. 2 CFR 200 requires adequate documentation of compliance with 2 CFR 200.214. Condition and context: The Organization established policies and procedures over suspension and debarment, including checking all vendors against the government suspension and debarment listing. The policies and procedures for suspension and debarment were being followed however the evidence of the search on sam.gov was not retained. A sample of five vendors with a total contract value of $8,528,526 was selected from a population of twelve. Cause: The Organization’s management did not retain evidence of compliance with the above criteria regarding suspension and debarment due to oversight. Effect: The Organization’s documentation was lacking evidence of tracking vendors for suspension and debarment. Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management updates its policies and procedures to ensure adequate supporting documentation of suspension and debarment verification is maintained. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Assistance Listing, Federal Agency, and Program Name ALN 21.027, Department of Treasury, COVID 19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 20.205, Department of Transportation, Highway Planning and Construction Federal Award Identification Number and Year ALN 21.027: 1505 0271, 2022 ALN 20.205: 24455, 2021 Pass through Entity ALN 21.027: Not applicable ALN 20.205: Colorado Department of Transportation Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding No Criteria Per 2 CFR 200.214, nonfederal entities are subject to the nonprocurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, as well as 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict making federal awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from receiving or participating in federal awards. Nonfederal entities may satisfy the criteria prescribed by 2 CFR part 180 by either checking SAM.gov exclusions, collecting a certification or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with the contracted party. Condition The Town could not provide evidence that it performed a check to verify its contractors were not suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed Not applicable Context The Town used each of its grants to procure services from one contractor and was unable to provide evidence that the check for suspension and debarment was completed prior to entering into its contracts, respectively. Plante & Moran, PLLC reviewed the SAM.gov website, noting that the two vendors were not listed as suspended or disbarred. Cause and Effect The Town did not retain evidence to support that it had conducted the search for whether the contractors were suspended or debarred prior to entering into the contracts. The lack of control could result in the Town entering into contracts with contractors that are suspended or debarred. Subsequently, the Town did complete the search on SAM.gov and retained evidence to support that the contractors were not suspended of debarred, thereby creating no questioned costs. Recommendation We recommend the Town implement its controls as designed by retaining supporting documentation to support that contractors are not suspended or debarred. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - The Town acknowledges the finding. The oversight was unintentional and occurred due to a lack of formalized procedures for verifying suspension and debarment status for all applicable federal contracts and subawards.
Assistance Listing, Federal Agency, and Program Name ALN 21.027, Department of Treasury, COVID 19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 20.205, Department of Transportation, Highway Planning and Construction Federal Award Identification Number and Year ALN 21.027: 1505 0271, 2022 ALN 20.205: 24455, 2021 Pass through Entity ALN 21.027: Not applicable ALN 20.205: Colorado Department of Transportation Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding No Criteria Per 2 CFR 200.214, nonfederal entities are subject to the nonprocurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, as well as 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict making federal awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from receiving or participating in federal awards. Nonfederal entities may satisfy the criteria prescribed by 2 CFR part 180 by either checking SAM.gov exclusions, collecting a certification or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with the contracted party. Condition The Town could not provide evidence that it performed a check to verify its contractors were not suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed Not applicable Context The Town used each of its grants to procure services from one contractor and was unable to provide evidence that the check for suspension and debarment was completed prior to entering into its contracts, respectively. Plante & Moran, PLLC reviewed the SAM.gov website, noting that the two vendors were not listed as suspended or disbarred. Cause and Effect The Town did not retain evidence to support that it had conducted the search for whether the contractors were suspended or debarred prior to entering into the contracts. The lack of control could result in the Town entering into contracts with contractors that are suspended or debarred. Subsequently, the Town did complete the search on SAM.gov and retained evidence to support that the contractors were not suspended of debarred, thereby creating no questioned costs. Recommendation We recommend the Town implement its controls as designed by retaining supporting documentation to support that contractors are not suspended or debarred. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - The Town acknowledges the finding. The oversight was unintentional and occurred due to a lack of formalized procedures for verifying suspension and debarment status for all applicable federal contracts and subawards.
Assistance Listing, Federal Agency, and Program Name ALN 21.027, Department of Treasury, COVID 19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 20.205, Department of Transportation, Highway Planning and Construction Federal Award Identification Number and Year ALN 21.027: 1505 0271, 2022 ALN 20.205: 24455, 2021 Pass through Entity ALN 21.027: Not applicable ALN 20.205: Colorado Department of Transportation Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding No Criteria Per 2 CFR 200.214, nonfederal entities are subject to the nonprocurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, as well as 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict making federal awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from receiving or participating in federal awards. Nonfederal entities may satisfy the criteria prescribed by 2 CFR part 180 by either checking SAM.gov exclusions, collecting a certification or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with the contracted party. Condition The Town could not provide evidence that it performed a check to verify its contractors were not suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed Not applicable Context The Town used each of its grants to procure services from one contractor and was unable to provide evidence that the check for suspension and debarment was completed prior to entering into its contracts, respectively. Plante & Moran, PLLC reviewed the SAM.gov website, noting that the two vendors were not listed as suspended or disbarred. Cause and Effect The Town did not retain evidence to support that it had conducted the search for whether the contractors were suspended or debarred prior to entering into the contracts. The lack of control could result in the Town entering into contracts with contractors that are suspended or debarred. Subsequently, the Town did complete the search on SAM.gov and retained evidence to support that the contractors were not suspended of debarred, thereby creating no questioned costs. Recommendation We recommend the Town implement its controls as designed by retaining supporting documentation to support that contractors are not suspended or debarred. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - The Town acknowledges the finding. The oversight was unintentional and occurred due to a lack of formalized procedures for verifying suspension and debarment status for all applicable federal contracts and subawards.
2024-003 Significant Deficiency in Internal Control and Compliance over Major Programs Funding Agency: Department of Treasury ALN: 21.027 Criteria Per 2 CFR 200.214, non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with parties that are suspended or debarred. 2 CFR 200.318(i) also states that "subrecipients must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection or rejection and the basis for the contract price." Condition The Organization has a procurement policy in place; however, the Organization neglected to document their suspension and debarment verification process for one of four procurement transactions tested. The Organization is also required by the Washington State Department of Agriculture ("WSDA") to receive prior approval for any equipment purchase or equipment repairs over $5,000. One of the four transactions tested did not receive prior approval from WSDA to make the purchase. There was no documentation that could support approval was received from WSDA after the purchase had been made. Cause The Organization claimed the suspension and debarment check occurred prior to entering into the transaction but neglected to retain documentation. The Organization also did not properly follow its procurement policy, nor the policy required by WSDA, requiring prior approval for any equipment purchase or repair over $5,000. Effect Payments may have been made to suspended or debarred vendors and gone undetected by the Organization. The Organization could have also made an equipment purchase or equipment repair that would not be refunded by WSDA (the pass-through entity). Repeat Finding No. Auditor's Recommendation The Organization should ensure the employee responsible for conducting a suspension and debarment check is (1) aware of the necessity to document the verification was done and (2) capable of documenting the verification. The Organization should also reevaluate its internal controls over procurements with WSDA funding to ensure that the Organization is receiving approval from the WSDA prior to making the purchase. Employees tasked responsible for making procurement transactions should be educated on the proper procurement procedures. Management should be checking for the WSDA approval prior to signing off on cash disbursements for equipment purchases or equipment repairs.
2024-003 Significant Deficiency in Internal Control and Compliance over Major Programs Funding Agency: Department of Treasury ALN: 21.027 Criteria Per 2 CFR 200.214, non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with parties that are suspended or debarred. 2 CFR 200.318(i) also states that "subrecipients must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection or rejection and the basis for the contract price." Condition The Organization has a procurement policy in place; however, the Organization neglected to document their suspension and debarment verification process for one of four procurement transactions tested. The Organization is also required by the Washington State Department of Agriculture ("WSDA") to receive prior approval for any equipment purchase or equipment repairs over $5,000. One of the four transactions tested did not receive prior approval from WSDA to make the purchase. There was no documentation that could support approval was received from WSDA after the purchase had been made. Cause The Organization claimed the suspension and debarment check occurred prior to entering into the transaction but neglected to retain documentation. The Organization also did not properly follow its procurement policy, nor the policy required by WSDA, requiring prior approval for any equipment purchase or repair over $5,000. Effect Payments may have been made to suspended or debarred vendors and gone undetected by the Organization. The Organization could have also made an equipment purchase or equipment repair that would not be refunded by WSDA (the pass-through entity). Repeat Finding No. Auditor's Recommendation The Organization should ensure the employee responsible for conducting a suspension and debarment check is (1) aware of the necessity to document the verification was done and (2) capable of documenting the verification. The Organization should also reevaluate its internal controls over procurements with WSDA funding to ensure that the Organization is receiving approval from the WSDA prior to making the purchase. Employees tasked responsible for making procurement transactions should be educated on the proper procurement procedures. Management should be checking for the WSDA approval prior to signing off on cash disbursements for equipment purchases or equipment repairs.
2024-003 Significant Deficiency in Internal Control and Compliance over Major Programs Funding Agency: Department of Treasury ALN: 21.027 Criteria Per 2 CFR 200.214, non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with parties that are suspended or debarred. 2 CFR 200.318(i) also states that "subrecipients must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection or rejection and the basis for the contract price." Condition The Organization has a procurement policy in place; however, the Organization neglected to document their suspension and debarment verification process for one of four procurement transactions tested. The Organization is also required by the Washington State Department of Agriculture ("WSDA") to receive prior approval for any equipment purchase or equipment repairs over $5,000. One of the four transactions tested did not receive prior approval from WSDA to make the purchase. There was no documentation that could support approval was received from WSDA after the purchase had been made. Cause The Organization claimed the suspension and debarment check occurred prior to entering into the transaction but neglected to retain documentation. The Organization also did not properly follow its procurement policy, nor the policy required by WSDA, requiring prior approval for any equipment purchase or repair over $5,000. Effect Payments may have been made to suspended or debarred vendors and gone undetected by the Organization. The Organization could have also made an equipment purchase or equipment repair that would not be refunded by WSDA (the pass-through entity). Repeat Finding No. Auditor's Recommendation The Organization should ensure the employee responsible for conducting a suspension and debarment check is (1) aware of the necessity to document the verification was done and (2) capable of documenting the verification. The Organization should also reevaluate its internal controls over procurements with WSDA funding to ensure that the Organization is receiving approval from the WSDA prior to making the purchase. Employees tasked responsible for making procurement transactions should be educated on the proper procurement procedures. Management should be checking for the WSDA approval prior to signing off on cash disbursements for equipment purchases or equipment repairs.
2024-003 Significant Deficiency in Internal Control and Compliance over Major Programs Funding Agency: Department of Treasury ALN: 21.027 Criteria Per 2 CFR 200.214, non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with parties that are suspended or debarred. 2 CFR 200.318(i) also states that "subrecipients must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection or rejection and the basis for the contract price." Condition The Organization has a procurement policy in place; however, the Organization neglected to document their suspension and debarment verification process for one of four procurement transactions tested. The Organization is also required by the Washington State Department of Agriculture ("WSDA") to receive prior approval for any equipment purchase or equipment repairs over $5,000. One of the four transactions tested did not receive prior approval from WSDA to make the purchase. There was no documentation that could support approval was received from WSDA after the purchase had been made. Cause The Organization claimed the suspension and debarment check occurred prior to entering into the transaction but neglected to retain documentation. The Organization also did not properly follow its procurement policy, nor the policy required by WSDA, requiring prior approval for any equipment purchase or repair over $5,000. Effect Payments may have been made to suspended or debarred vendors and gone undetected by the Organization. The Organization could have also made an equipment purchase or equipment repair that would not be refunded by WSDA (the pass-through entity). Repeat Finding No. Auditor's Recommendation The Organization should ensure the employee responsible for conducting a suspension and debarment check is (1) aware of the necessity to document the verification was done and (2) capable of documenting the verification. The Organization should also reevaluate its internal controls over procurements with WSDA funding to ensure that the Organization is receiving approval from the WSDA prior to making the purchase. Employees tasked responsible for making procurement transactions should be educated on the proper procurement procedures. Management should be checking for the WSDA approval prior to signing off on cash disbursements for equipment purchases or equipment repairs.
2024-003 Significant Deficiency in Internal Control and Compliance over Major Programs Funding Agency: Department of Treasury ALN: 21.027 Criteria Per 2 CFR 200.214, non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with parties that are suspended or debarred. 2 CFR 200.318(i) also states that "subrecipients must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection or rejection and the basis for the contract price." Condition The Organization has a procurement policy in place; however, the Organization neglected to document their suspension and debarment verification process for one of four procurement transactions tested. The Organization is also required by the Washington State Department of Agriculture ("WSDA") to receive prior approval for any equipment purchase or equipment repairs over $5,000. One of the four transactions tested did not receive prior approval from WSDA to make the purchase. There was no documentation that could support approval was received from WSDA after the purchase had been made. Cause The Organization claimed the suspension and debarment check occurred prior to entering into the transaction but neglected to retain documentation. The Organization also did not properly follow its procurement policy, nor the policy required by WSDA, requiring prior approval for any equipment purchase or repair over $5,000. Effect Payments may have been made to suspended or debarred vendors and gone undetected by the Organization. The Organization could have also made an equipment purchase or equipment repair that would not be refunded by WSDA (the pass-through entity). Repeat Finding No. Auditor's Recommendation The Organization should ensure the employee responsible for conducting a suspension and debarment check is (1) aware of the necessity to document the verification was done and (2) capable of documenting the verification. The Organization should also reevaluate its internal controls over procurements with WSDA funding to ensure that the Organization is receiving approval from the WSDA prior to making the purchase. Employees tasked responsible for making procurement transactions should be educated on the proper procurement procedures. Management should be checking for the WSDA approval prior to signing off on cash disbursements for equipment purchases or equipment repairs.
Criteria or Specific Requirement – Per 2 CFR §180.300 and §200.214, non-federal entities are prohibited from entering into covered transactions (e.g., contracts or subawards expected to equal or exceed $25,000) with parties that are suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participation in federal programs. Conditions – Verification of SAMS.gov vendors was not performed. Context – During our testing of procurement, we sampled nine expenditures totaling $367,163. The total population of procurement expenditures charged to the program was $800,000. We noted that all nine selections of expenditures did not have SAMS.gov verification documentation. Cause – The Association did not have a formal process or checklist to ensure that vendors were checked against the SAM.gov exclusion list before contract award. Procurement staff were not trained on this requirement. Effect – Use of non-approved vendors could have occurred. However, as part our audit procedures, we determined that the expenditures were made with contractors which were not suspended or disbarred and were approved on the SAMS.gov website. Recommendation – We recommend the Association implement a formal policy and procedure to verify all vendors against SAM.gov for covered transactions exceeding $25,000. Staff responsible for federal procurement should be trained, and documentation of vendor status verification should be retained with procurement records. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions – Procurement Policy was updated and documentation will be maintained to support vendor verification in the future.
Subject: 2024-002 Material Weakness – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Noncompliance Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Noncompliance Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.214 and 2 CFR Part 180, the City is required to ensure that it does not enter into a covered transaction with a party that is suspended or debarred. Verification must be performed through one of the following: checking SAM.gov, collecting a certification, or adding a contract clause requiring compliance. Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (Continued) Condition and Context: The City lacked a formalized procedure for verifying suspension and debarment status for 1 covered transaction under revenue loss category for the CSLFRF award. This covered transaction paid for additional costs added onto the purchase of a fire engine with a change order related to increased manufacturing costs incurred as a result of the Coronavirus pandemic. The City did not verify suspension and debarment on this vendor prior to paying for these costs under CSLFRF. Without proper verification, the City risks using federal funds to engage with ineligible vendors, which could result in questioned costs, repayment obligations to the federal government, or future audit findings that may impact continued federal funding. Although no suspended or debarred vendors were identified in the sampled transactions, the lack of internal controls and documentation constitutes material noncompliance with 2 CFR §200.214. Cause and Effect: The City did not establish formal procedures on suspension and debarment requirements for one of the eleven covered transactions tested, resulting in material noncompliance with the suspension and debarment requirements of the CSLRF program and increased risk of using federal funds with ineligible vendors. Recommendation: We recommend the City develop and implement formal written procedures to ensure suspension and debarment checks are performed on all CSLFRF transactions and documented appropriately. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The City agrees with the recommendation and plans to implement corrective action by December 31, 2025. Staff are in the process of drafting internal policies for adoption by the appropriate boards to address this item as soon as possible for any of our grant funds not managed by a third-party administrator.
Criteria or Specific Requirements Per 2 CFR 200.214 Suspension and debarment, non-Federal entities are subject to the nonprocurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Per CFR 180.300, Subpart C: Responsibilities of Participants Regarding Transactions Doing Business With Other Persons, when an entity enters into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, the entity must verify that the person with whom the entity intends to do business is not excluded or disqualified. The entity does this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Per Uniform Guidance Compliance Supplement part 6 – Internal Control, non-federal entities are required to establish and maintain internal control over the federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards. Condition We performed testwork over the Foundation’s implementation of the Corrective Action Plan (CAP) for Finding 2023-002. Per the CAP, the Foundation will conduct regular, ongoing monitoring of vendors providing services billed to grantors, including identifying all grant-reimbursed vendors and coordinating with Accounts Payable to perform annual suspension and debarment checks. We noted that the Foundation’s updated formal policies and procedures now require suspension and debarment checks at initial vendor setup and on an annual basis thereafter. Based on test work over a sample of 6 vendors covering the period from September 1, 2024 (CAP implementation date) to December 31, 2024, we did not identify any vendors in the sample who were suspended or debarred. However, we were unable to obtain documentation demonstrating that the Foundation performed the annual vendor suspension and debarment verification checks. Evidence that the annual vendor suspension and debarment verification checks had been performed was not yet available. Questioned Costs None. Cause and Effect For the period from September 1, 2024 (CAP implementation date) to December 31, 2024, the annual vendor suspension and debarment verification checks were still in progress, and supporting documentation was not yet available. The Foundation subsequently completed the annual checks in February 2025, which aligns with the typical start dates of most vendor contracts.
Criteria or Specific Requirements Per 2 CFR 200.214 Suspension and debarment, non-Federal entities are subject to the nonprocurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Per CFR 180.300, Subpart C: Responsibilities of Participants Regarding Transactions Doing Business With Other Persons, when an entity enters into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, the entity must verify that the person with whom the entity intends to do business is not excluded or disqualified. The entity does this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Per Uniform Guidance Compliance Supplement part 6 – Internal Control, non-federal entities are required to establish and maintain internal control over the federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards. Condition We performed testwork over the Foundation’s implementation of the Corrective Action Plan (CAP) for Finding 2023-002. Per the CAP, the Foundation will conduct regular, ongoing monitoring of vendors providing services billed to grantors, including identifying all grant-reimbursed vendors and coordinating with Accounts Payable to perform annual suspension and debarment checks. We noted that the Foundation’s updated formal policies and procedures now require suspension and debarment checks at initial vendor setup and on an annual basis thereafter. Based on test work over a sample of 6 vendors covering the period from September 1, 2024 (CAP implementation date) to December 31, 2024, we did not identify any vendors in the sample who were suspended or debarred. However, we were unable to obtain documentation demonstrating that the Foundation performed the annual vendor suspension and debarment verification checks. Evidence that the annual vendor suspension and debarment verification checks had been performed was not yet available. Questioned Costs None. Cause and Effect For the period from September 1, 2024 (CAP implementation date) to December 31, 2024, the annual vendor suspension and debarment verification checks were still in progress, and supporting documentation was not yet available. The Foundation subsequently completed the annual checks in February 2025, which aligns with the typical start dates of most vendor contracts.
Criteria or Specific Requirements Per 2 CFR 200.214 Suspension and debarment, non-Federal entities are subject to the nonprocurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Per CFR 180.300, Subpart C: Responsibilities of Participants Regarding Transactions Doing Business With Other Persons, when an entity enters into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, the entity must verify that the person with whom the entity intends to do business is not excluded or disqualified. The entity does this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Per Uniform Guidance Compliance Supplement part 6 – Internal Control, non-federal entities are required to establish and maintain internal control over the federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards. Condition We performed testwork over the Foundation’s implementation of the Corrective Action Plan (CAP) for Finding 2023-002. Per the CAP, the Foundation will conduct regular, ongoing monitoring of vendors providing services billed to grantors, including identifying all grant-reimbursed vendors and coordinating with Accounts Payable to perform annual suspension and debarment checks. We noted that the Foundation’s updated formal policies and procedures now require suspension and debarment checks at initial vendor setup and on an annual basis thereafter. Based on test work over a sample of 6 vendors covering the period from September 1, 2024 (CAP implementation date) to December 31, 2024, we did not identify any vendors in the sample who were suspended or debarred. However, we were unable to obtain documentation demonstrating that the Foundation performed the annual vendor suspension and debarment verification checks. Evidence that the annual vendor suspension and debarment verification checks had been performed was not yet available. Questioned Costs None. Cause and Effect For the period from September 1, 2024 (CAP implementation date) to December 31, 2024, the annual vendor suspension and debarment verification checks were still in progress, and supporting documentation was not yet available. The Foundation subsequently completed the annual checks in February 2025, which aligns with the typical start dates of most vendor contracts.
Criteria or Specific Requirements Per 2 CFR 200.214 Suspension and debarment, non-Federal entities are subject to the nonprocurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Per CFR 180.300, Subpart C: Responsibilities of Participants Regarding Transactions Doing Business With Other Persons, when an entity enters into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, the entity must verify that the person with whom the entity intends to do business is not excluded or disqualified. The entity does this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Per Uniform Guidance Compliance Supplement part 6 – Internal Control, non-federal entities are required to establish and maintain internal control over the federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards. Condition We performed testwork over the Foundation’s implementation of the Corrective Action Plan (CAP) for Finding 2023-002. Per the CAP, the Foundation will conduct regular, ongoing monitoring of vendors providing services billed to grantors, including identifying all grant-reimbursed vendors and coordinating with Accounts Payable to perform annual suspension and debarment checks. We noted that the Foundation’s updated formal policies and procedures now require suspension and debarment checks at initial vendor setup and on an annual basis thereafter. Based on test work over a sample of 6 vendors covering the period from September 1, 2024 (CAP implementation date) to December 31, 2024, we did not identify any vendors in the sample who were suspended or debarred. However, we were unable to obtain documentation demonstrating that the Foundation performed the annual vendor suspension and debarment verification checks. Evidence that the annual vendor suspension and debarment verification checks had been performed was not yet available. Questioned Costs None. Cause and Effect For the period from September 1, 2024 (CAP implementation date) to December 31, 2024, the annual vendor suspension and debarment verification checks were still in progress, and supporting documentation was not yet available. The Foundation subsequently completed the annual checks in February 2025, which aligns with the typical start dates of most vendor contracts.
Criteria or Specific Requirements Per 2 CFR 200.214 Suspension and debarment, non-Federal entities are subject to the nonprocurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Per CFR 180.300, Subpart C: Responsibilities of Participants Regarding Transactions Doing Business With Other Persons, when an entity enters into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, the entity must verify that the person with whom the entity intends to do business is not excluded or disqualified. The entity does this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Per Uniform Guidance Compliance Supplement part 6 – Internal Control, non-federal entities are required to establish and maintain internal control over the federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards. Condition We performed testwork over the Foundation’s implementation of the Corrective Action Plan (CAP) for Finding 2023-002. Per the CAP, the Foundation will conduct regular, ongoing monitoring of vendors providing services billed to grantors, including identifying all grant-reimbursed vendors and coordinating with Accounts Payable to perform annual suspension and debarment checks. We noted that the Foundation’s updated formal policies and procedures now require suspension and debarment checks at initial vendor setup and on an annual basis thereafter. Based on test work over a sample of 6 vendors covering the period from September 1, 2024 (CAP implementation date) to December 31, 2024, we did not identify any vendors in the sample who were suspended or debarred. However, we were unable to obtain documentation demonstrating that the Foundation performed the annual vendor suspension and debarment verification checks. Evidence that the annual vendor suspension and debarment verification checks had been performed was not yet available. Questioned Costs None. Cause and Effect For the period from September 1, 2024 (CAP implementation date) to December 31, 2024, the annual vendor suspension and debarment verification checks were still in progress, and supporting documentation was not yet available. The Foundation subsequently completed the annual checks in February 2025, which aligns with the typical start dates of most vendor contracts.
Criteria or Specific Requirements Per 2 CFR 200.214 Suspension and debarment, non-Federal entities are subject to the nonprocurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Per CFR 180.300, Subpart C: Responsibilities of Participants Regarding Transactions Doing Business With Other Persons, when an entity enters into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, the entity must verify that the person with whom the entity intends to do business is not excluded or disqualified. The entity does this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Per Uniform Guidance Compliance Supplement part 6 – Internal Control, non-federal entities are required to establish and maintain internal control over the federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards. Condition We performed testwork over the Foundation’s implementation of the Corrective Action Plan (CAP) for Finding 2023-002. Per the CAP, the Foundation will conduct regular, ongoing monitoring of vendors providing services billed to grantors, including identifying all grant-reimbursed vendors and coordinating with Accounts Payable to perform annual suspension and debarment checks. We noted that the Foundation’s updated formal policies and procedures now require suspension and debarment checks at initial vendor setup and on an annual basis thereafter. Based on test work over a sample of 6 vendors covering the period from September 1, 2024 (CAP implementation date) to December 31, 2024, we did not identify any vendors in the sample who were suspended or debarred. However, we were unable to obtain documentation demonstrating that the Foundation performed the annual vendor suspension and debarment verification checks. Evidence that the annual vendor suspension and debarment verification checks had been performed was not yet available. Questioned Costs None. Cause and Effect For the period from September 1, 2024 (CAP implementation date) to December 31, 2024, the annual vendor suspension and debarment verification checks were still in progress, and supporting documentation was not yet available. The Foundation subsequently completed the annual checks in February 2025, which aligns with the typical start dates of most vendor contracts.
Criteria or Specific Requirements Per 2 CFR 200.214 Suspension and debarment, non-Federal entities are subject to the nonprocurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Per CFR 180.300, Subpart C: Responsibilities of Participants Regarding Transactions Doing Business With Other Persons, when an entity enters into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, the entity must verify that the person with whom the entity intends to do business is not excluded or disqualified. The entity does this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Per Uniform Guidance Compliance Supplement part 6 – Internal Control, non-federal entities are required to establish and maintain internal control over the federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards. Condition We performed testwork over the Foundation’s implementation of the Corrective Action Plan (CAP) for Finding 2023-002. Per the CAP, the Foundation will conduct regular, ongoing monitoring of vendors providing services billed to grantors, including identifying all grant-reimbursed vendors and coordinating with Accounts Payable to perform annual suspension and debarment checks. We noted that the Foundation’s updated formal policies and procedures now require suspension and debarment checks at initial vendor setup and on an annual basis thereafter. Based on test work over a sample of 6 vendors covering the period from September 1, 2024 (CAP implementation date) to December 31, 2024, we did not identify any vendors in the sample who were suspended or debarred. However, we were unable to obtain documentation demonstrating that the Foundation performed the annual vendor suspension and debarment verification checks. Evidence that the annual vendor suspension and debarment verification checks had been performed was not yet available. Questioned Costs None. Cause and Effect For the period from September 1, 2024 (CAP implementation date) to December 31, 2024, the annual vendor suspension and debarment verification checks were still in progress, and supporting documentation was not yet available. The Foundation subsequently completed the annual checks in February 2025, which aligns with the typical start dates of most vendor contracts.
Criteria or Specific Requirements Per 2 CFR 200.214 Suspension and debarment, non-Federal entities are subject to the nonprocurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Per CFR 180.300, Subpart C: Responsibilities of Participants Regarding Transactions Doing Business With Other Persons, when an entity enters into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, the entity must verify that the person with whom the entity intends to do business is not excluded or disqualified. The entity does this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Per Uniform Guidance Compliance Supplement part 6 – Internal Control, non-federal entities are required to establish and maintain internal control over the federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards. Condition We performed testwork over the Foundation’s implementation of the Corrective Action Plan (CAP) for Finding 2023-002. Per the CAP, the Foundation will conduct regular, ongoing monitoring of vendors providing services billed to grantors, including identifying all grant-reimbursed vendors and coordinating with Accounts Payable to perform annual suspension and debarment checks. We noted that the Foundation’s updated formal policies and procedures now require suspension and debarment checks at initial vendor setup and on an annual basis thereafter. Based on test work over a sample of 6 vendors covering the period from September 1, 2024 (CAP implementation date) to December 31, 2024, we did not identify any vendors in the sample who were suspended or debarred. However, we were unable to obtain documentation demonstrating that the Foundation performed the annual vendor suspension and debarment verification checks. Evidence that the annual vendor suspension and debarment verification checks had been performed was not yet available. Questioned Costs None. Cause and Effect For the period from September 1, 2024 (CAP implementation date) to December 31, 2024, the annual vendor suspension and debarment verification checks were still in progress, and supporting documentation was not yet available. The Foundation subsequently completed the annual checks in February 2025, which aligns with the typical start dates of most vendor contracts.
Criteria or Specific Requirements Per 2 CFR 200.214 Suspension and debarment, non-Federal entities are subject to the nonprocurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Per CFR 180.300, Subpart C: Responsibilities of Participants Regarding Transactions Doing Business With Other Persons, when an entity enters into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, the entity must verify that the person with whom the entity intends to do business is not excluded or disqualified. The entity does this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Per Uniform Guidance Compliance Supplement part 6 – Internal Control, non-federal entities are required to establish and maintain internal control over the federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards. Condition We performed testwork over the Foundation’s implementation of the Corrective Action Plan (CAP) for Finding 2023-002. Per the CAP, the Foundation will conduct regular, ongoing monitoring of vendors providing services billed to grantors, including identifying all grant-reimbursed vendors and coordinating with Accounts Payable to perform annual suspension and debarment checks. We noted that the Foundation’s updated formal policies and procedures now require suspension and debarment checks at initial vendor setup and on an annual basis thereafter. Based on test work over a sample of 6 vendors covering the period from September 1, 2024 (CAP implementation date) to December 31, 2024, we did not identify any vendors in the sample who were suspended or debarred. However, we were unable to obtain documentation demonstrating that the Foundation performed the annual vendor suspension and debarment verification checks. Evidence that the annual vendor suspension and debarment verification checks had been performed was not yet available. Questioned Costs None. Cause and Effect For the period from September 1, 2024 (CAP implementation date) to December 31, 2024, the annual vendor suspension and debarment verification checks were still in progress, and supporting documentation was not yet available. The Foundation subsequently completed the annual checks in February 2025, which aligns with the typical start dates of most vendor contracts.
U.S. Department of Treasury, COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - 21.027 Criteria or Specific Requirement - Suspension and Debarment and Material Weakness In accordance with 2 CFR 200.214, non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. In accordance with 2 CFR Section 180.300, when a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR Section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Per 2 CFR 200.303, the non-Federal entities receiving federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish and maintain internal control design to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition - Suspension and debarment checks were not completed for a vendor prior to entering into a contract. Cause - The City's controls to ensure suspension and debarment checks on vendors receiving federal funds did not operate effectively. Effect - Federal funds could be paid to entities that are suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs - None noted, as the vendor was reviewed and determined to not be suspended or debarred. Context - The City only entered into one contract during the year ended December 31, 2024 that was considered a "covered transaction" and spent approximately $540,000 under this contract. This single contract was selected for testing suspension and debarment and uncovered the City did not check the vendor's suspension and debarment status prior to purchase. The City completed the suspsension and debarment check subsequent to purchase and verified the vendor was not suspended or disbarred. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if applicable - None noted. Recommendation - Policies and procedures should be modified to ensure that suspension and debarment checks are performed on vendors prior to making purchases with federal funds. View of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Actions - Management agrees with the stated finding and has implemented a corrective action plan.
Department of Treasury, State of Iowa Department of Management, Federal Financial Assistance Listing 21.029, 526659 Coronavirus Capital Projects Fund Procurement, Suspension & Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR 200.318 maintains that recipients must have and use documented procurement policies and must conform procurement standards in sections 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR 200 Appendix II requires certain provisions be included in contracts if criteria are applicable. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.214 requires recipients to restrict the subawards and contract with certain parities that are debarred, suspended, or excluded from ineligible participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Condition: Testing of the federal program identified the following: • The Cooperative’s formally documented procurement policy was missing one required element as it relates to the methods of procurement. • One instance where the Cooperative followed a bid process, however, the documentation was not retained to support the selection. Additionally, the contract with the vendor was missing required contract provisions in accordance with Uniform Guidance. • One instance where the Cooperative did not follow the procurement process as detailed in the procurement policy and did not have any formal documentation or contract in place with the vendor. • Two instances where the Cooperative entered into a contract with a vendor over $25,000 and there was no review performed to ensure the vendor was not suspended or debarred. Cause: Contract provisions were not evaluated compared to Uniform Guidance contract requirements. Contracts entered were not evaluated in accordance with Uniform Guidance as it relates to suspension and debarment. Effect: Ineffective controls over this are of compliance could result in a reasonable possibility the Cooperative would be noncompliant with the compliance requirements outlined above. Additionally, the cooperative may enter into a covered transaction with a vendor that is suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of 2 out of 4 vendors were selected for testing. Repeat Finding form Prior Year: No Recommendation: We recommend the Cooperative update their procurement policy to ensure it includes the required elements as it relates to the methods of procurement. In addition, we suggest that management implement procedures and control processes related to the review of contracts to ensure the procurement methods are being followed as it relates to covered transactions and those contracts include the required Uniform Guidance provisions. Also, management should ensure vendors are not suspended or debarred from doing business with the federal government. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR §200.214, nonfederal entities other than states must follow the suspension and debarment standards set out at 2 CFR Part 180, which restrict making Federal awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from receiving or participating in Federal awards. Condition: During our audit of the Organization's federal awards, we identified a deficiency in the grantee’s procurement, suspension, and debarment procedures related to suspension and debarment for 4 of 4 subcontractors we reviewed. Specifically, the grantee did not verify that subcontractors were not excluded or disqualified before entering into transactions expected to exceed $25,000 in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. Cause: The Organization did not have adequate policies and procedures or internal controls in place to ensure compliance with the procurement, suspension, and debarment requirements. Effect: The Organization may be paying subcontractors that are suspended or debarred, which would be unallowable costs. However, none of the 4 subcontractors were suspended or debarred as of the date audit procedures were performed. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization implement policies and procedures to ensure that all subcontractors and subrecipients of covered transactions are properly verified before entering into transactions, and that this be documented as a control each time it is performed. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and procedures have been implemented to address the related issues.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR §200.214, nonfederal entities other than states must follow the suspension and debarment standards set out at 2 CFR Part 180, which restrict making Federal awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from receiving or participating in Federal awards. Condition: During our audit of the Organization's federal awards, we identified a deficiency in the grantee’s procurement, suspension, and debarment procedures related to suspension and debarment for 4 of 4 subcontractors we reviewed. Specifically, the grantee did not verify that subcontractors were not excluded or disqualified before entering into transactions expected to exceed $25,000 in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. Cause: The Organization did not have adequate policies and procedures or internal controls in place to ensure compliance with the procurement, suspension, and debarment requirements. Effect: The Organization may be paying subcontractors that are suspended or debarred, which would be unallowable costs. However, none of the 4 subcontractors were suspended or debarred as of the date audit procedures were performed. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization implement policies and procedures to ensure that all subcontractors and subrecipients of covered transactions are properly verified before entering into transactions, and that this be documented as a control each time it is performed. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and procedures have been implemented to address the related issues.
FINDING 2024-004 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): FY2024 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2023-005. Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the County to ensure compliance with the requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement The County had not established a purchasing policy that would reflect applicable state laws and regulations, including procedures to avoid acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items; procedures to ensure that all solicitations incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the material, product, or service to be procured; and did not maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award, and administration of contracts. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 SHELBY COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with COVID-19 - State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS), collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. The County did not have internal controls in place to ensure compliance with the suspension and debarment compliance requirement. Upon inquiry of the County's policies and procedures related to suspension and debarment requirements, the County stated that they did not have policies or procedures in place for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified from participating in federal assistance programs or activities. Two covered transactions for goods or services that equaled or exceeded $25,000 that were paid from SLFRF funds during the audit period were identified. Each transaction was examined to determine whether the County verified the suspension and debarment status of either vendor prior to payment. The two covered transactions, totaling $95,122, did not include the appropriate provisions in the contracts nor did the County require a certification or check the EPLS to ensure the entity was not suspended or debarred prior to making payment. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non- Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 SHELBY COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.214 states: "Recipients and subrecipients are subject to the nonprocurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, as well as 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict making Federal awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from receiving or participating in Federal awards." 31 CFR 19.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the EPLS; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person if allowed by this rule; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the County. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the County's management of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, vendors and subrecipients to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Any program funds the County used to pay vendors that have been suspended or debarred would be unallowable, and the funding agency could potentially recover them. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the County establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Additionally, we recommended the County establish documented procurement procedures consistent with state and local laws for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Finding 2024-002 Procurement Policy During our review of the Organization’s procurement policy, we noted that while a general framework exists, the policy does not currently address several key elements required under 2 CFR Part 200 - Uniform Guidance. Specifically, the procurement policy omits critical components related to vendor acceptance, debarment verification, domestic procurement preference, and the detailed processes required for the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. The absence of these elements increases the risk of noncompliance with Federal procurement standards, vendor selection errors, and insufficient documentation in the event of Federal oversight or audit. Federal Agency: Multiple (Various pass-through and direct Federal awards) AL #: Various. Compliance requirement: Audit requirement 2 CFR Part 200 Type of Finding: Noncompliance and significant deficiency in internal control over compliance. Repeat Finding: No. Criteria: According to Uniform Guidance, non-federal entities must establish and follow procurement policies that: Include procedures to verify vendor eligibility through SAM.gov per 2 CFR §200.214. Clearly define procurement methods and thresholds, including the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. Incorporate a domestic preference for procurements per 2 CFR §200.322. Maintain documented procedures for handling procurement disputes, protests, and source evaluations. Cause: The Organization’s procurement policy has not been formally updated to fully incorporate the current Federal requirements as outlined in Uniform Guidance. Effect: Without a fully compliant procurement policy, the Organization is at increased risk of noncompliance with Federal procurement standards, inadvertently contracting with ineligible or debarred vendors and inadequate documentation to support decisions. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs identified. Recommendation: We recommend that management amend and formally update the procurement policy to address the following critical areas: Vendor acceptance and debarment testing, definition and procedures for the Simplified Acquisition Threshold, domestic preference for procurements, procedures for handling procurement issues, and policy governance and version control. Management Response: We appreciate AAFCPAs’ review and agree that our procurement policy requires updates to better align with current federal requirements and internal best practices. To improve clarity, accountability, and regulatory compliance, the Finance Department will work with the Fiscal Sponsorship Department to develop the Organization’s procurement policy going forward. We will ensure the updated policy includes the following: We will formalize procedures to confirm vendor eligibility, including consistent use of the SAM.gov exclusions list prior to entering contracts, and ensure documentation is retained for audit purposes. The updated policy will outline specific steps for procurement activities at various thresholds, particularly mid-range purchases, with requirements for obtaining multiple quotes and documenting price comparisons. In alignment with Federal guidelines, the revised policy will include a provision supporting preference for U.S.-made products and materials when feasible. New sections will be added to address how the Organization will manage vendor selection reviews, disputes, and issue resolution to promote fairness and consistency in the procurement process. To ensure transparency and version control, the policy will include the date of each revision and a process for periodic review. The Fiscal Sponsorship Department will implement the updated policy, coordinate training for programmatic staff, and monitor compliance with the updated procedures. We expect the revised procurement policy to be finalized and implemented by July 31, 2025.
Finding 2024-002 Procurement Policy During our review of the Organization’s procurement policy, we noted that while a general framework exists, the policy does not currently address several key elements required under 2 CFR Part 200 - Uniform Guidance. Specifically, the procurement policy omits critical components related to vendor acceptance, debarment verification, domestic procurement preference, and the detailed processes required for the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. The absence of these elements increases the risk of noncompliance with Federal procurement standards, vendor selection errors, and insufficient documentation in the event of Federal oversight or audit. Federal Agency: Multiple (Various pass-through and direct Federal awards) AL #: Various. Compliance requirement: Audit requirement 2 CFR Part 200 Type of Finding: Noncompliance and significant deficiency in internal control over compliance. Repeat Finding: No. Criteria: According to Uniform Guidance, non-federal entities must establish and follow procurement policies that: Include procedures to verify vendor eligibility through SAM.gov per 2 CFR §200.214. Clearly define procurement methods and thresholds, including the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. Incorporate a domestic preference for procurements per 2 CFR §200.322. Maintain documented procedures for handling procurement disputes, protests, and source evaluations. Cause: The Organization’s procurement policy has not been formally updated to fully incorporate the current Federal requirements as outlined in Uniform Guidance. Effect: Without a fully compliant procurement policy, the Organization is at increased risk of noncompliance with Federal procurement standards, inadvertently contracting with ineligible or debarred vendors and inadequate documentation to support decisions. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs identified. Recommendation: We recommend that management amend and formally update the procurement policy to address the following critical areas: Vendor acceptance and debarment testing, definition and procedures for the Simplified Acquisition Threshold, domestic preference for procurements, procedures for handling procurement issues, and policy governance and version control. Management Response: We appreciate AAFCPAs’ review and agree that our procurement policy requires updates to better align with current federal requirements and internal best practices. To improve clarity, accountability, and regulatory compliance, the Finance Department will work with the Fiscal Sponsorship Department to develop the Organization’s procurement policy going forward. We will ensure the updated policy includes the following: We will formalize procedures to confirm vendor eligibility, including consistent use of the SAM.gov exclusions list prior to entering contracts, and ensure documentation is retained for audit purposes. The updated policy will outline specific steps for procurement activities at various thresholds, particularly mid-range purchases, with requirements for obtaining multiple quotes and documenting price comparisons. In alignment with Federal guidelines, the revised policy will include a provision supporting preference for U.S.-made products and materials when feasible. New sections will be added to address how the Organization will manage vendor selection reviews, disputes, and issue resolution to promote fairness and consistency in the procurement process. To ensure transparency and version control, the policy will include the date of each revision and a process for periodic review. The Fiscal Sponsorship Department will implement the updated policy, coordinate training for programmatic staff, and monitor compliance with the updated procedures. We expect the revised procurement policy to be finalized and implemented by July 31, 2025.
Finding 2024-001: Suspension and Debarment (Significant Deficiency) Information on the Federal Program: 93.048 Criteria: According to 2 CFR §200.30, the non-Federal entity (i.e. the Organization) must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or in the "Internal Control Integrated Framework" issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). According to 2 CFR §200.214, the non-Federal entity is subject to to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Condition: The Organization failed to perform and/or properly document its due diligence with respect to these requirements. Cause: The Organization experienced turnover during the year, resulting in inconsistency and oversight of the compliance requirement. Effect or Potential Effect: The Organization is exposed to an increased risk that future noncompliance could occur by entering into transactions with vendors, contractors, or consultants that are suspended and debarred. If a non-Federal entity knowingly does business with an excluded person, the agency responsible for the Center's funding may disallow costs, annul or terminate the transaction, issue a stop work order, debar or suspend the non-Federal entity, or take other remedies as appropriate. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: During our audit, we noted two cases our of nine samples in which the Organization did not perform or did not maintain proper support to demonstrate that it performed checks via SAM.gov to ensure that potential vendors, contractors, or consultants are suspended or debarred. The failure to screen such parties increases the possibility that U.S. Government funds may inadvertently be provided to individuals or organizations deemed to be excluded by the U.S. Government. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization implement internal controls to ensure that all vendors, contractors, and consultants are screened for suspension and debarment prior to entering into any executed contract. We further recommend that a policy be formalized and implemented that requires an annual screening of any current vendors, contractors, or consultants as well.
Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Federal agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Program: Continuation of the National Evaluations System for Health Technology Coordinating Center Assistance listing number: 93.103 Federal award identification number and year: • 2U01FD006292-06 2024 • 3U01FD006292-06S1 2023 Criteria: 2 CFR 200.318 states non-federal entities must have and use documented procurement procedures that conform to 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR 200.214 states non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Order 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR Part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. 2 CFR 200 requires adequate documentation of compliance with 2 CFR 200.214. Condition and context: The Organization established policies and procedures over suspension and debarment, including checking all vendors against the government suspension and debarment listing. The policies and procedures for suspension and debarment were being followed however the evidence of the search on sam.gov was not retained. A sample of five vendors with a total contract value of $8,528,526 was selected from a population of twelve. Cause: The Organization’s management did not retain evidence of compliance with the above criteria regarding suspension and debarment due to oversight. Effect: The Organization’s documentation was lacking evidence of tracking vendors for suspension and debarment. Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management updates its policies and procedures to ensure adequate supporting documentation of suspension and debarment verification is maintained. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Federal agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Program: Continuation of the National Evaluations System for Health Technology Coordinating Center Assistance listing number: 93.103 Federal award identification number and year: • 2U01FD006292-06 2024 • 3U01FD006292-06S1 2023 Criteria: 2 CFR 200.318 states non-federal entities must have and use documented procurement procedures that conform to 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR 200.214 states non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Order 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR Part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. 2 CFR 200 requires adequate documentation of compliance with 2 CFR 200.214. Condition and context: The Organization established policies and procedures over suspension and debarment, including checking all vendors against the government suspension and debarment listing. The policies and procedures for suspension and debarment were being followed however the evidence of the search on sam.gov was not retained. A sample of five vendors with a total contract value of $8,528,526 was selected from a population of twelve. Cause: The Organization’s management did not retain evidence of compliance with the above criteria regarding suspension and debarment due to oversight. Effect: The Organization’s documentation was lacking evidence of tracking vendors for suspension and debarment. Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management updates its policies and procedures to ensure adequate supporting documentation of suspension and debarment verification is maintained. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Assistance Listing, Federal Agency, and Program Name ALN 21.027, Department of Treasury, COVID 19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 20.205, Department of Transportation, Highway Planning and Construction Federal Award Identification Number and Year ALN 21.027: 1505 0271, 2022 ALN 20.205: 24455, 2021 Pass through Entity ALN 21.027: Not applicable ALN 20.205: Colorado Department of Transportation Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding No Criteria Per 2 CFR 200.214, nonfederal entities are subject to the nonprocurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, as well as 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict making federal awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from receiving or participating in federal awards. Nonfederal entities may satisfy the criteria prescribed by 2 CFR part 180 by either checking SAM.gov exclusions, collecting a certification or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with the contracted party. Condition The Town could not provide evidence that it performed a check to verify its contractors were not suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed Not applicable Context The Town used each of its grants to procure services from one contractor and was unable to provide evidence that the check for suspension and debarment was completed prior to entering into its contracts, respectively. Plante & Moran, PLLC reviewed the SAM.gov website, noting that the two vendors were not listed as suspended or disbarred. Cause and Effect The Town did not retain evidence to support that it had conducted the search for whether the contractors were suspended or debarred prior to entering into the contracts. The lack of control could result in the Town entering into contracts with contractors that are suspended or debarred. Subsequently, the Town did complete the search on SAM.gov and retained evidence to support that the contractors were not suspended of debarred, thereby creating no questioned costs. Recommendation We recommend the Town implement its controls as designed by retaining supporting documentation to support that contractors are not suspended or debarred. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - The Town acknowledges the finding. The oversight was unintentional and occurred due to a lack of formalized procedures for verifying suspension and debarment status for all applicable federal contracts and subawards.
Assistance Listing, Federal Agency, and Program Name ALN 21.027, Department of Treasury, COVID 19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 20.205, Department of Transportation, Highway Planning and Construction Federal Award Identification Number and Year ALN 21.027: 1505 0271, 2022 ALN 20.205: 24455, 2021 Pass through Entity ALN 21.027: Not applicable ALN 20.205: Colorado Department of Transportation Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding No Criteria Per 2 CFR 200.214, nonfederal entities are subject to the nonprocurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, as well as 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict making federal awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from receiving or participating in federal awards. Nonfederal entities may satisfy the criteria prescribed by 2 CFR part 180 by either checking SAM.gov exclusions, collecting a certification or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with the contracted party. Condition The Town could not provide evidence that it performed a check to verify its contractors were not suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed Not applicable Context The Town used each of its grants to procure services from one contractor and was unable to provide evidence that the check for suspension and debarment was completed prior to entering into its contracts, respectively. Plante & Moran, PLLC reviewed the SAM.gov website, noting that the two vendors were not listed as suspended or disbarred. Cause and Effect The Town did not retain evidence to support that it had conducted the search for whether the contractors were suspended or debarred prior to entering into the contracts. The lack of control could result in the Town entering into contracts with contractors that are suspended or debarred. Subsequently, the Town did complete the search on SAM.gov and retained evidence to support that the contractors were not suspended of debarred, thereby creating no questioned costs. Recommendation We recommend the Town implement its controls as designed by retaining supporting documentation to support that contractors are not suspended or debarred. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - The Town acknowledges the finding. The oversight was unintentional and occurred due to a lack of formalized procedures for verifying suspension and debarment status for all applicable federal contracts and subawards.
Assistance Listing, Federal Agency, and Program Name ALN 21.027, Department of Treasury, COVID 19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 20.205, Department of Transportation, Highway Planning and Construction Federal Award Identification Number and Year ALN 21.027: 1505 0271, 2022 ALN 20.205: 24455, 2021 Pass through Entity ALN 21.027: Not applicable ALN 20.205: Colorado Department of Transportation Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding No Criteria Per 2 CFR 200.214, nonfederal entities are subject to the nonprocurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, as well as 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict making federal awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from receiving or participating in federal awards. Nonfederal entities may satisfy the criteria prescribed by 2 CFR part 180 by either checking SAM.gov exclusions, collecting a certification or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with the contracted party. Condition The Town could not provide evidence that it performed a check to verify its contractors were not suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed Not applicable Context The Town used each of its grants to procure services from one contractor and was unable to provide evidence that the check for suspension and debarment was completed prior to entering into its contracts, respectively. Plante & Moran, PLLC reviewed the SAM.gov website, noting that the two vendors were not listed as suspended or disbarred. Cause and Effect The Town did not retain evidence to support that it had conducted the search for whether the contractors were suspended or debarred prior to entering into the contracts. The lack of control could result in the Town entering into contracts with contractors that are suspended or debarred. Subsequently, the Town did complete the search on SAM.gov and retained evidence to support that the contractors were not suspended of debarred, thereby creating no questioned costs. Recommendation We recommend the Town implement its controls as designed by retaining supporting documentation to support that contractors are not suspended or debarred. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - The Town acknowledges the finding. The oversight was unintentional and occurred due to a lack of formalized procedures for verifying suspension and debarment status for all applicable federal contracts and subawards.
2024-003 Significant Deficiency in Internal Control and Compliance over Major Programs Funding Agency: Department of Treasury ALN: 21.027 Criteria Per 2 CFR 200.214, non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with parties that are suspended or debarred. 2 CFR 200.318(i) also states that "subrecipients must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection or rejection and the basis for the contract price." Condition The Organization has a procurement policy in place; however, the Organization neglected to document their suspension and debarment verification process for one of four procurement transactions tested. The Organization is also required by the Washington State Department of Agriculture ("WSDA") to receive prior approval for any equipment purchase or equipment repairs over $5,000. One of the four transactions tested did not receive prior approval from WSDA to make the purchase. There was no documentation that could support approval was received from WSDA after the purchase had been made. Cause The Organization claimed the suspension and debarment check occurred prior to entering into the transaction but neglected to retain documentation. The Organization also did not properly follow its procurement policy, nor the policy required by WSDA, requiring prior approval for any equipment purchase or repair over $5,000. Effect Payments may have been made to suspended or debarred vendors and gone undetected by the Organization. The Organization could have also made an equipment purchase or equipment repair that would not be refunded by WSDA (the pass-through entity). Repeat Finding No. Auditor's Recommendation The Organization should ensure the employee responsible for conducting a suspension and debarment check is (1) aware of the necessity to document the verification was done and (2) capable of documenting the verification. The Organization should also reevaluate its internal controls over procurements with WSDA funding to ensure that the Organization is receiving approval from the WSDA prior to making the purchase. Employees tasked responsible for making procurement transactions should be educated on the proper procurement procedures. Management should be checking for the WSDA approval prior to signing off on cash disbursements for equipment purchases or equipment repairs.