Findings Citing § 200.214

Finding 2025-001- Material Weakness related to Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Identification of the Federal Program Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Defense, Department of Justice, National Science Foundation, Department of Agriculture, US Agency for International Development Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” 2 CFR Section 200.214 – Suspension and debarment – Non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations that restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Condition: The Medical Center did not evaluate all vendors for suspension and debarment during the fiscal year. As a result, there were instances of procurement transactions where the vendor was not subjected to suspension and debarment evaluation procedures prior to entering into the transaction. Cause: The issue occurred due to deficiencies in the design and operation of controls over the completeness and accuracy of vendor information provided to the third-party service provider for suspension and debarment monitoring. Specifically, controls were not in place to ensure that all vendors used for the Research and Development Cluster program expenditures were included in the vendor listing submitted for suspension and debarment monitoring. Effect or Potential Effect: The lack of an effective control over suspension and debarment has the potential to result in noncompliance with applicable requirements. Accordingly, the Medical Center could have entered into a procurement transaction with a suspended or debarred vendor. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified. Context: Management was unable to provide evidence of a control being consistently performed throughout the audit period. The total population consisted of 1,374 vendors utilized for expenditures charged to the Research and Development Cluster. Our testing identified that 844 vendors, representing approximately $80 million in expenditures, were not evaluated for suspension and debarment prior to entering into a transaction. The remaining 530 vendors were appropriately evaluated. Subsequently, all 1,374 vendors were evaluated for suspension and debarment and none were noted as being suspended or debarred. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: Management should design and implement effective internal controls to ensure the completeness and accuracy of vendor listings submitted for suspension and debarment evaluation. Controls should include procedures to verify that all vendors associated with Federal program expenditures are evaluated prior to entering into transactions and that evaluation results are appropriately documented and monitored on an ongoing basis. Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the finding and has implemented procedures to ensure the vendor list for suspension and debarment evaluation is complete and accurate.

Department of Treasury, State of Indiana Office of Community and Rural Affairs, Federal Financial Assistance Listing 21.029, AL192-23-NLC-23-103, AL192-23-NLC-25-104 A, AL192-23-NLC-25-104 B Coronavirus Capital Projects Fund Procurement, Suspension & Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR 200.318 maintains that recipients must have and use documented procurement policies and must conform procurement standards to Uniform Guidance standards in sections 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR 200 Appendix II requires certain provisions be included in contracts if criteria are applicable. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.214 requires recipients to restrict the subawards and contract with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or excluded from ineligible participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Condition: Testing of the federal program identified the following: • The Entity’s formally documented procurement policy was missing the required elements detailed under Uniform Guidance • Four instances where the Entity did not follow the procurement process and did not have any formal documentation in place with the vendors. • Four instances where the Entity entered into a contract with a vendor over $25,000 and there was no review performed to ensure the vendor was not suspended or debarred. Cause: The Entity was not aware of the federal procurement requirements. Contract provisions were not evaluated compared to Uniform Guidance contract requirements. Contracts entered were not evaluated in accordance with Uniform Guidance as it relates to suspension and debarment. Effect: Ineffective controls over this area of compliance could result in a reasonable possibility the Entity would be noncompliant with the compliance requirements outlined above. Additionally, the Entity may enter into a covered transaction with a vendor that is suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of 4 out of 10 vendors were selected for testing. Repeat Finding form Prior Year: No Recommendation: We recommend the Entity update their procurement policy to ensure it includes all the required elements in accordance with Uniform Guidance. In addition, we suggest that management implement procedures and control processes related to the review of procurement to ensure the procurement methods are being followed and documentation is retained to support compliance. Also, management should ensure vendors are not suspended or debarred from doing business with the federal government prior to entering into a procurement transaction. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.

2025-001 – Suspension and Debarment Finding Type: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance/Noncompliance Program: ALN 14.267 – Supportive Housing Program • Grant number MI0265L5F182316 • Grant number MI0265L5F182417 Criteria: As required by 2 CFR 200.214, Non-Federal entities are subject to the debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Condition: The vendor used for this grant was not checked for suspension and debarment prior to execution of the contract. Also, the contract did not include certification that the vendor was not suspended or debarred. Cause: Management oversight. Questioned Cost: None. Recommendation: We recommend that the CMHSP either document the check for suspension and debarment prior to execution of the contract or update contract language to include certification that vendor is not suspended or debarred. View of Responsible Official: Management is in agreement with this recommendation

Criteria or Specific Requirements: In accordance with 2 CFR Part 180 and 2 CFR 200.214, non-Federal entities are prohibited from entering into covered transactions with parties that are suspended or debarred from participating in Federal programs. Prior to entering into a covered transaction, entities should verify that subrecipients are not suspended or debarred through SAM.gov, obtaining a certification from the subrecipient, or another method permitted by the regulations. Effective internal controls should be designed and implemented to ensure compliance with suspension and debarment requirements. Condition: The Organization did not maintain documented evidence demonstrating that suspension and debarment verification procedures were performed for covered transactions with vendors and subrecipients. Per inquiry with the Director of Finance and Operations, the Organization requires subrecipients to self-report their suspension and debarment status as part of the annual risk assessment process; however, the Organization does not perform or document independent verification procedures, such as reviewing SAM.gov, to confirm subrecipient eligibility. In addition, the Organization did not retain documentation evidencing that SAM.gov verification was performed prior to vendor selection, as management indicated such documentation had not previously been requested. Cause: Internal controls over suspension and debarment compliance were not designed and operating effectively to ensure that suspension and debarment verification procedures were independently performed and documented for covered transactions. Specifically, the Organization relied on self-certifications and informal verification procedures and did not maintain evidence demonstrating that suspension and debarment reviews were completed in accordance with Federal requirements. Effect: Failure to independently verify and document the suspension and debarment status of vendors and subrecipients increases the risk that the Organization could enter into covered transactions with ineligible entities, resulting in noncompliance with Federal requirements. Questioned Costs: Questioned costs were not identified. Perspective Information: During testing of suspension and debarment compliance, seven vendors and two subrecipients were selected for testing. The Organization was unable to provide documentation demonstrating that independent suspension and debarment verification procedures had been performed for the entities selected. As a result, we independently verified the suspension and debarment status of the vendors and subrecipients through SAM.gov and confirmed that none of the entities tested were suspended or debarred. No instances of noncompliance were identified. Repeat Finding: None. Recommendations: We recommend that management establish and document procedures requiring suspension and debarment verification for all covered transactions with vendors and subrecipients. Such procedures should include performing and retaining evidence of SAM.gov verification (or another method permitted by Federal regulations) prior to entering into covered transactions. Management should also incorporate supervisory review procedures to ensure suspension and debarment verifications are completed and documented in accordance with Federal requirements.

2025-003 Suspension & Debarment Cluster: Other major program referenced below Sponsoring Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Award Names: Doorway for Substance Use-Related Supports and Services Award Numbers: Cheshire Medical Center 05-95-920510-7040000 Assistance Listing Title: Opioid STR Assistance Listing Number: 93.788 Award Year: 2024-2025 Pass-through entity: New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services Criteria Per 2 CFR 200.214, a non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures and is prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. The Dartmouth Health System’s suspension and debarment policy requires suspension and debarment verifications to be completed for all vendors utilized on federal awards, regardless of expenditure amount. Condition In testing compliance with suspension and debarment requirements, PwC noted that 2 selections totaling $15.9k out of 9 selections tested totaling $53.5k did not have sufficient supporting documentation to evidence that required suspension and debarment procedures were completed prior to the related transaction and payment dates. For the items noted, the suspension and debarment checks were performed after the related transaction dates and payment dates. As a result, the Dartmouth Health System did not demonstrate that vendors were verified as not suspended or debarred before federal funds were disbursed. Management indicated that certain alternative verification procedures may have been performed prior to payment; however, documentation was not maintained to support that such procedures were completed timely. Cause While the Dartmouth Health System’s policy outlines the procedures to be followed for federal purchases, including required suspension and debarment checks, there was turnover within the procurement function for Cheshire Medical Center. Therefore, instances were identified in which a suspension and debarment check was not performed prior to the transaction. Effect The lack of adherence to the suspension and debarment verification policy could result in the Health System conducting business with a vendor that is suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs None noted. Repeat Finding No Recommendation We recommend the Dartmouth Health System ensure that timely suspension and debarment verifications are completed in line with policy. Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan is included at the end of this report after the summary schedule of prior audit findings and status.

Condition SCORE has an established procedure requiring review of vendors in the System for Award Management (SAM.gov) to ensure vendors are not suspended or debarred prior to engagement using federal funds. During our testing of suspension and debarment for new and renewed contracts, we noted that the documentation provided as evidence that SCORE conducted the required checks did not consistently include clear evidence that vendors were verified in SAM.gov for suspension, debarment, and active registration status at the time of award or renewal. In several instances, the documentation provided lacked dated SAM.gov search results or other proof of verification, making it difficult to confirm the date the required eligibility checks were completed before obligating federal funds. Additionally, for multi-year or continuing contracts, certain vendors that were originally vetted at the time of initial engagement did not have documented evidence of a subsequent suspension and debarment verification. Criteria Federal procurement standards require non-Federal entities to: ▪ Verify that vendors are not suspended or debarred prior to entering into or renewing an agreement (2 CFR § 180 and § 200.214). ▪ Maintain complete procurement documentation, including approvals, selection methods, contract documents, and evidence of compliance with procurement rules, in accordance with Uniform Guidance procurement requirements (2 CFR § 200.318–327). A SAM.gov verification—via screenshot, printout, or automated system—is an acceptable form of documentation. Cause While SCORE has implemented procedures to verify new vendors through SAM.gov, the procedures did not explicitly require periodic verification for existing vendors whose contracts continue across multiple years or are renewed. Also, while personnel may be performing eligibility checks for new vendors, there is no standardized requirement or checklist to ensure that proof of the verification (such as dated screenshots or search results) is consistently saved. Effect As a result, the organization lacks sufficient documentary evidence to demonstrate that the required SAM.gov verifications were performed at the time of contract award or renewal. Although no vendors were identified as suspended or debarred, the absence of supporting documentation limits the organization’s ability to substantiate compliance with federal procurement requirements. Also, there is a risk that an existing vendor could become suspended or debarred after the initial contract award and continue to receive payments without updated verification. Recommendation We recommend that SCORE expand its existing vendor compliance procedures to include periodic verification of suspension and debarment status for multi-year or continuing service agreement vendors. We also recommend that management implement a standard procedure requiring documentation of dated SAM.gov verification for all vendors prior to contract award and renewal. These dated SAM.gov verifications should be retained as part of the vendor file.

Criteria—According to the Coronavirus State and Local Recover Funds (CSLRF) Final Rule, Suspension and Debarment is covered under CFR 200.214 in Subpart C, which is fully applicable under the revenue replacement method. As such, suspension and debarment should be evaluated and documented for all non-payroll expenditures under the program. Condition—During our testing, it was noted that 1 of 3 of the vendor selections tested for this program did not have suspension and debarment evaluated or documented prior to the purchase. In addition, there was no formal control policy for the Town to evaluate and document suspension and debarment for expenditures in this program. Cause—The Town was unaware of this requirement applied to CSLRF funding under the revenue replacement method. Effect—In this case, there is no indication that the vendor in question was actually suspended or debarred. However, by not evaluating suspension and debarment for the expenditures of this program, expenditures could be made that do not comply with the program requirements for suspension and debarment. Recommendation—We recommend that suspension and debarment be evaluated and documented for all expenditures made for this program and that a formal control policy for suspension and debarment be considered for such purchases.

Finding No.: 2025-012 Identification of Federal Program: Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) AL Program: 14.267 Continuum of Care Program Federal Award No.: GU0018L9C002209, GU0026L9C002305, GU0028L9C002204, GU0037L9C002201, GU0031L9C002203 Area: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): 2 CFR 200.214 states: Recipients and subrecipients are subject to the nonprocurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, as well as 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict making Federal awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from receiving or participating in Federal awards. 2 CFR 200.318(h) states: (h) Responsible contractors. The recipient or subrecipient must award contracts only to responsible contractors that possess the ability to perform successfully under the terms and conditions of a proposed contract. The recipient or subrecipient must consider contractor integrity, public policy compliance, proper classification of employees (see the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. 201, chapter 8), past performance record, and financial and technical resources when conducting a procurement transaction. Condition: Of seven items tested, totaling $288,950 out of $1,053,179 in expenditures subject to suspension and debarment testing, five subawards (71%) lacked evidence of the required verification, as follows: Item # Federal Award No. Vendor No. Expenditures Questioned Costs 1 GU0018L9C002209 LL00000078 $ 40,015 $ 40,015 2 GU0026L9C002305 LL00000078 43,917 43,917 3 GU0028L9C002204 VN000HAPP 118,418 118,418 4 GU0037L9C002201 VN00092963 59,368 59,368 5 GU0031L9C002203 VN00200326 27,232 27,232 $288,950 $288,950 Finding No.: 2025-012, continued Cause: Management has not established formal procedures or documented guidelines requiring verification of vendor suspension/debarment status as part of the awarding process. Effect or potential effect: GHURA is in noncompliance with applicable suspension and debarment requirements. Questioned costs: $288,950 Identification as a repeat finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: Responsible management should establish and consistently enforce formal procedures requiring the retention of all subaward-related documentation, including documented verification of entity eligibility (e.g., SAM.gov checks) and applicable certifications, within the subrecipient file. Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the finding. Refer to Management’s position as outlined in the Corrective Action Plan.

Finding No.: 2025-015 Identification of Federal Program: Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) AL Program: 14.850 Public Housing Operating Fund Federal Award No.: GQ00100000125D, GQ00100000225D, GQ00100000325D, GQ00100000425D Area: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): 2 CFR 200.214 states: Recipients and subrecipients are subject to the nonprocurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, as well as 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict making Federal awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from receiving or participating in Federal awards. GHURA Procurement Policy, Chapter VII further states: For all purchases above the Petty Cash/Micro Purchase threshold, GHURA shall prepare an Independent Cost Estimate (ICE) prior to solicitation. The level of detail shall be commensurate with the cost and complexity of the item to be purchased. 2 CFR 200.319(a) states: All procurement transactions under the Federal award must be conducted in a manner that provides full and open competition and is consistent with the standards of this section and § 200.320. GHURA Procurement Policy, Chapter IV, Sealed Bids, Section D further states: Noncompetitive–contracts: If only one responsive bid is received from a responsible bidder, award shall not be made unless the price can be determined to be reasonable, based on a cost or price analysis and that GHURA obtains HUD approval for contracts exceeding the Simplified Acquisition Threshold or the GHURA's small purchase limit, whichever is less. Finding No.: 2025-015, continued Condition: For twenty-one (72%) of twenty-nine items examined, aggregating $236,001 of $1,508,875, in total expenditures of $1,543,721 subjected to procurement, suspension and debarment tests, deficiencies were noted, as follows: Item # Project No. Purchase Order No. Expenditures Questioned Costs 1 GQ001000003 PO250839 $ 55,700 $ 55,700 2 GQ001000001 PO250018 46,020 46,020 3 GQ001000002 PO250047 33,600 33,600 4 GQ001000001, GQ001000002 GQ001000003, GQ001000004 PO250373 26,371 26,371 5 GQ001000001 PO251763 12,316 12,316 6 GQ001000003 PO251249 2,761 2,761 7 GQ001000002 PO251207 2,730 2,730 8 GQ001000004 PO250955 2,562 2,562 9 GQ001000004 PO250153 2,365 2,365 10 GQ001000003 PO250104 2,123 2,123 11 GQ001000004 PO250572 1,230 1,230 12 GQ001000004 PO250156 1,100 1,100 13 GQ001000002 PO250111 914 914 14 GQ001000002 PO251224 672 672 15 GQ001000004 PO251679 651 651 16 GQ001000002 PO250753 560 560 17 GQ001000004 PO251266 542 542 18 GQ001000004 BPA250133 7,240 7,240 19 GQ001000002 BPA250008 3,500 3,500 20 GQ001000003 BPA250203 3,333 3,333 21 GQ001000002 BPA250025 500 500 $ 206,790 $ 206,790 For item #s 1 through 4, there was no documentation on file to support that GHURA performed procedures to ensure contracting parties are not debarred, suspended, or excluded from receiving or participating in federal awards. For item #s 1 through 21, there was no documentation on file to support that GHURA performed Independent Cost Estimate (ICE) procedures prior to solicitation. For item # 8, there was no documentation on file to support that GHURA conducted the continued procurement of services beyond the contract extension in a manner that ensured adequate competition or proper justification. Finding No.: 2025-015, continued Condition, continued: For item # 16 and item #s 20 and 21, there was no documentation (e.g. solicitations) on file to support the procurement transactions being conducted in a manner that provided for full and open competition. Specifically, there was no evidence of solicitations being issued or documentation on file to justify the use of noncompetitive procurement. For item #s 19 through 21, there was no documentation (e.g. solicitations) on file to support the procurement transactions being conducted in a manner that provided for full and open competition. Specifically, the procurement file lacks evidence of minimum solicitation to support fair competition and does not demonstrate that blanket purchase orders for towing and advertisement services were awarded equally among multiple vendors. Cause: GHURA did not have adequate monitoring controls in place to ensure compliance with applicable procurement, suspension and debarment requirements. Specifically, policies and procedures were not established or enforced to ensure verification and documentation that contracting parties were not suspended or debarred. In addition, procurement personnel did not follow required policies and procedures requiring minimum solicitation and justification for noncompetitive procurement, and management review did not detect or prevent these deficiencies. Effect or potential effect: GHURA is in noncompliance with applicable procurement, suspension and debarment requirements. Questioned costs: $206,790 Recommendation: 1. Responsible management should establish and consistently enforce formal procedures requiring the retention of documented verification of eligibility (e.g., SAM.gov checks) and applicable certifications within the procurement file. Additionally, management should ensure that, prior to the execution of contracts, all agreements include the required suspension and debarment clause to demonstrate compliance with suspension and debarment requirements. 2. Establish controls to ensure required documentation (Independent Cost Estimates, proper justification, etc.) is prepared, documented, and maintained in the procurement file prior to solicitation for all applicable procurements. Finding No.: 2025-015, continued Views of Responsible Officials: Management partially concurs with the finding. Refer to Management’s position as outlined in the Corrective Action Plan. Conclusion: Management submitted additional information on June 28, 2026; however, due to time constraints, we were unable to sufficiently corroborate and evaluate the documentation provided. Accordingly, the finding remains, as there was insufficient evidence to support a determination of compliance as of the audit date.

Criteria or specific requirement: Per 2 CFR 200.214 and 2 CFR Part 180, non-federal entities must verify that vendors are not excluded or disqualified before entering into covered transactions expected to equal or exceed $25,000. Verification must be performed by checking SAM.gov, collecting a certification, or adding a clause to the contract.

Congressional Directives Assistance Listing Number 93.493 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Criteria or Specific Requirement – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment, 2 CFR Sections 200.214 and 200.318-327 Condition – The Medical Center’s Procurement/Contract Management policy does not fully incorporate Uniform Guidance requirements applicable to federal awards. Cause – The Medical Center has established procurement policies designed primarily for general operational purchasing; however, federal procurement requirements were not formally incorporated into the policy framework. Effect or Potential Effect – The Medical Center could potentially enter into transactions that are not conducted in accordance with the Uniform Guidance requirements. Questioned Costs – N/A Context – The exceptions were identified through evaluation of the entity’s procurement policies and application to federal program requirements. The deficiencies are systemic in nature, affecting the design of controls over procurement and suspension and debarment compliance across applicable transactions. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if applicable – N/A Recommendation – The Medical Center should update procurement policies to explicitly incorporate Uniform Guidance including defining and implementing federally compliant procurement methods and thresholds. The Medical Center should implement controls to ensure consistent application of requirements across all federally funded procurements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions – Management agrees with the finding. The Medical Center will revise and update its procurement policies and procedures to incorporate applicable federal procurement requirements under the Uniform Guidance.

Federal Agency: Federal Program Title: ALN: Pass-Through Agency: Pass-Through Number: Award Period: U.S. Department of Treasury COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds 21.027 Texas Department of Emergency Management #1505-0271 March 3, 2021 – December 31, 2026 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance and Noncompliance Criteria or specific requirement: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), the City of Manor, Texas must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR 200.214, recipients and subrecipients are subject to the nonprocurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, as well as 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict making Federal awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from receiving or participating in Federal awards. Per 2 CFR 180.505 – Who uses SAM.gov Exclusions? (a) Federal agency officials use SAM.gov Exclusions to determine whether to enter into a transaction with a person, as required under § 180.430 (b) Participants also may, but are not required to, use SAM.gov Exclusions to determine if: (1) Principals of their transactions are excluded or disqualified, as required under § 180.320; or (2) Persons with whom they are entering into covered transactions at the next lower tier are excluded or disqualified. (c) TheSAM.gov Exclusions are available to the general public. Condition: For one procurement, qualification reference checks were performed for a contractor, however, a suspension and debarment check was not checked with SAM.gov. Questioned costs: None Context: See “Condition.” Cause: Individuals performing the vendor compliance checks were not adequately trained on the requirements that must be adhered to per federal guidelines. Effect: Failure to complete proper vendor compliance checks prior to entering into a covered transaction may lead to entering into contracts with suspended or disbarred vendors that could result in noncompliance and questioned costs. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the City provide additional training to individuals performing vendor compliance checks. We also recommend the City establish internal controls to monitor that vendor compliance checks are being completed accurately and timely. Views of responsible officials: See management response on corrective action plan.

Federal Program: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds COVID-19 Award Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Agency: Department of Treasury Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance Questioned Costs: None identified Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR §§ 180.300, 180.320, and 200.214, non-federal entities may not enter into covered transactions with parties that are suspended or debarred from participating in federal programs. Prior to awarding a covered contract, recipients and subrecipients must verify that the vendor is not suspended or debarred by reviewing SAM.gov, obtaining a certification from the vendor, or including an appropriate clause in the contract. Documentation supporting the verification performed should be retained to demonstrate compliance with federal requirements. Condition During testing of procurement transactions charged to the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds program, the auditee was unable to provide documentation demonstrating that suspension and debarment verification procedures were performed prior to contract award. Management indicated that staff routinely verified vendor eligibility through SAM.gov; however, evidence of the searches was not retained in the procurement files. As part of audit procedures, the auditors subsequently performed SAM.gov searches for the vendors tested and noted that none were suspended or debarred. Context Four (4) of four (4) covered transactions tested did not contain documentation supporting the completion of suspension and debarment verification procedures. The sample was not and was not intended to be, a statistically valid sample. Cause The auditee's procurement policies and procedures were not followed, which required documentation supporting suspension and debarment verification activities. In addition, management's review controls were not designed to ensure that evidence of compliance was maintained within the procurement file. Effect The lack of retained documentation increases the risk that contracts funded with federal awards could be awarded to suspended or debarred vendors and prevents the auditee from demonstrating compliance with Uniform Guidance procurement requirements. Federal procurement guidance emphasizes verifying vendor eligibility through SAM.gov or other allowable methods. Identification as a repeat finding Not a repeat finding Recommendation We recommend that management revise procurement policies and procedures to require the retention of documentation supporting suspension and debarment verification for all covered transactions, including: • Vendor name searched • Date of search • Search results • Evidence of review and approval Management should also implement a monitoring control to ensure required documentation is maintained before contract award and retained in the procurement file. Views of Responsible Officials See Corrective Action Plan letter.

Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Federal Program Title: Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF) ALN: 66.468 Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Number and Period: 2521902915 September 1, 2024 - August 31, 2025 Statistically Valid Sample: No, and not intended to be a statistically valid sample Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Noncompliance Criteria or specific requirement: "Per 2 CFR §200.303(a), Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) must establish, document, and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that it is managing the Federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should align with the guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control-Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR §200.318, the recipient or subrecipient must maintain and use documented procedures for procurement transactions under a federal award or subaward, including for acquisition of property or services. These documented procurement procedures must be consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. Per 2 CFR §200.214, recipients and subrecipients are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, as well as 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict making Federal awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from receiving or participating in Federal awards. Condition: Audit procedures included a review of five procurements conducted during the fiscal year to assess whether TCEQ adhered to required procurement procedures and performed vendor eligibility verifications prior to entering into covered transactions. For one procurement, totaling $16,175, the required procurement processes were not followed, and the necessary vendor compliance checks, including verification of suspension and debarment status, were not completed before executing the transaction. Questioned costs: None. Context: See “Condition.” Cause: The procurement was initiated directly by the program area without notifying or coordinating with the Procurement and Contracts Section. Program staff proceeded with the purchase under the assumption that procurement involvement was unnecessary because the selected vendor was the sole provider of the required item. As a result, established procurement procedures and vendor compliance verification processes were not followed. Effect: Failure to follow procurement procedures and complete proper vendor compliance checks prior to entering into a covered transaction may lead to entering contracts with suspended or debarred vendors that could result in noncompliance and questioned costs. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: TCEQ should provide targeted training to program staff on federal procurement requirements, including the necessity of coordinating all purchases through the P&C Section and completing required vendor compliance checks. Training should emphasize procedures for sole‑source or limited‑source procurements and reinforce staff responsibilities under 2 CFR procurement and internal control standards. Regular refresher sessions and documented guidance will help ensure consistent understanding and adherence to required procurement practices across all program areas. Views of responsible officials: The Financial Administration Division (FAD) will implement the audit’s recommendations. FAD will reinforce the guidance provided through continuous training, documentation, and improved internal controls.

Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: COVID-19: American Rescue Plan Act - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Pass-Through Agency: City of Pasco Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: July 26, 2024 – September 2, 2026 Type of Finding:  Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance – Suspension & Debarment  Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards §200.214 requires non-Federal entities to ensure that contractors are not suspended or debarred prior to entering into covered procurement transactions and to maintain controls to verify compliance with suspension and debarment requirements. Condition: Verification was not formally documented. As such, we were unable to verify this was performed prior to engaging with the contractors. Questioned costs: None. Context: Suspension and debarment verification support from SAM.gov was not retained, and no documentation was available to evidence that verification procedures were performed prior to the Club engaging with the contractors. Cause: Management did not retain documentation evidencing the performance of suspension and debarment verification procedures. Effect: The Club did not have documented evidence to demonstrate compliance with suspension and debarment verification requirements. Repeat finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend the Club establish and retain documentation to evidence that suspension and debarment verification procedures are performed prior to engaging with contractors. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

FINDING 2025-001 SUSPENSION AND DEBARMENT SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY Federal Program: Charter Schools Program Assistance Listing Number: 84.282A Criteria 2 CFR 200.214 states that recipients and subrecipients are subject to the nonprocurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, as well as 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict making Federal awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from receiving or participating in Federal awards. Condition The School does not have a policy in place outlining the process to check that vendors are not suspended or debarred. Additionally, the School could not support that these checks were being completed for vendors paid using federal program funds. Cause The School was not aware of the requirement to check vendors for suspension and debarment. Effect Failing to check vendors for suspension and debarment could result in improperly paying vendors with funds from federal sources. Recommendation We recommend the School develop a policy and internal controls to ensure vendors paid with federal funds are checked for suspension or debarment. Views of Responsible Officials The School’s Corrective Action Plan is included on page 26.

Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement - Information on Federal Program: U.S. Department of Agriculture Child Nutrition Cluster (National School Breakfast Program, School Lunch Program, Commodities, Summer Food Service Program Assistance Listing numbers 10.553, 10.555 and 10.559) passed through the New York State Education Department. Criteria: 2 CFR Section 200.214 refers to executive orders 12549 and 12689 as well as 2CFR Part 180, which stipulates that no awards, subawards, or contracts be awarded to parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from receiving or participating in Federal Assistance programs or activities. Statement of Condition: During our discussions with management, we noted that the District is not verifying the eligibility of vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs on an annual basis. Statement of Cause: The District did not review compliance requirements related to procurement outlined in 2 CFR Section 200.214 and 2 CFR part 180. Statement of Effect: The District is not in compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.214. The District is not performing required procedures, as a result, vendors that are not eligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities could be selected. Questioned Costs: None Perspective Information: As a result of inquiry, the District performed a review of the District’s vendors charged to the fund, and none were suspended or debarred from participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the District review the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.214 and 2 CFR Part 180 and ensure that a review of the eligibility of potential vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs or activities is performed prior to disbursing funds to the vendor. This should be verified on an annual basis. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The District will review the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.214 and 2 CFR Part 180 and ensure that a review of the eligibility of potential vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs or activities is performed prior to disbursing funds to the vendor. This will be verified on an annual basis. Anticipated implementation date is October 1, 2025 by responsible person(s) District Business Official and District Treasurer Kelsey Reed.

Child Nutrition - Procurement - Information on Federal Program: U.S. Department of Agriculture Child Nutrition Cluster (National School Breakfast Program, School Lunch Program, Supply Chain, Snack, non-cash commodities, Summer Food Service Program, Assistance Listing numbers 10.553, 10.555 and 10.559) passed through the New York State Education Department. Criteria: 2 CFR Section 200.214 refers to executive orders 12549 and 12689 as well as 2 CFR Part 180, which stipulates that no awards, subawards, or contracts be awarded to parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from receiving or participating in Federal Assistance programs or activities. Statement of Condition: During our discussions with management, we noted that the District is not verifying the eligibility of vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs on an annual basis for the school lunch fund vendors. Statement of Cause: The District did not review compliance requirements related to procurement outlined in 2 CFR Section 200.214 and 2 CFR part 180. Statement of Effect: The District is not in compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.214. The District is not performing required procedures, as a result, vendors that are not eligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities could be selected. Questioned Costs: None Perspective Information: As a result of inquiry, the District performed a review of vendors charged to the school lunch fund, none were suspended or debarred from participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the District review the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.214 and 2 CFR Part 180 and ensure that a review of the eligibility of potential vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs or activities is performed prior to disbursing funds to the vendor. This should be verified on an annual basis. Views of the Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Effective September 15, 2025 the District Treasurer will check the status of all vendors associated to the Child Nutrition program. In cooperation with the Food Service Director, the District Treasurer will review eligibility of any vendors that are requested to be used. Any vendor that is found not to be eligibility list will be reported to the Food Service Director and Purchasing Agent. This list will be updated and checked annually.

Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement. Information on Federal Program: U.S. Department of Agriculture Child Nutrition Cluster (National School Breakfast Program, School Lunch Program, Supply Chain, non-cash assistance, Summer Food Service Program Assistance Listing numbers 10.553, 10.555 and 10.559) passed through the New York State Education Department. Criteria: 2 CFR Section 200.214 refers to executive orders 12549 and 12689 as well as 2CFR Part 180, which stipulates that no awards, subawards, or contracts be awarded to parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from receiving or participating in Federal Assistance programs or activities. Statement of Condition: During our discussions with management, we noted that the District is not verifying the eligibility of vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs on an annual basis. Statement of Cause: The District did not review compliance requirements related to procurement outlined in 2 CFR Section 200.214 and 2 CFR part 180. Statement of Effect: The District is not in compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.214 and 2 CFR Part 180. The District is not performing required procedures, as a result, vendors that are not eligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities could be selected. Questioned Costs: None Perspective Information: As a result of inquiry, the District was able to obtain information through the bidding process that the vendor had been reviewed for suspension and debarment, they also ensured the District’s vendors charged to the fund, were not suspended or debarred from participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the District review the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.214 and 2 CFR Part 180 and ensure that a review of the eligibility of potential vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs or activities is performed prior to disbursing funds to the vendor. This should be verified on an annual basis. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The District acknowledges the finding and agrees with the recommendation. To address this issue the Business Office will verify all vendors used in federally funded programs at least once annually and prior to disbursing funds. Michele Hogan and April Young will be responsible with an anticipated completion date of September 30, 2025. Staff will review both 2 CFR Section 200.214 and 2 CFR Part 180 for understanding and compliance. Michele Hogan and John Lybert will be responsible with an anticipated completion date of September 30, 2025.

Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement. Information on Federal Program: U.S. Department of Agriculture Child Nutrition Cluster (National School Breakfast Program, School Lunch Program, School Lunch Program Supply Chain- COVID 19 Assistance Listing Numbers 10.553 and 10.555) passed through the New York State Education Department. Criteria: 2 CFR Section 200.318 stipulates that a non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable state, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in Part 200 Subpart D. Additionally, 2 CFR Section 200.214 refers to executive orders 12549 and 12689 as well as 2 CFR Part 180, which stipulates that no awards, subawards, or contracts be awarded to parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from receiving or participating in Federal assistance programs or activities. Statement of Condition: During our discussions with management, we noted that the District is not verifying the eligibility of vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs on an annual basis. They are however, checking the status of any new vendors. Statement of Cause: The District did not review compliance requirements related to procurement outlined in 2 CFR Section 200.314 and 2 CFR Part 180. Statement of Effect: The District is not in compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.214 and 2 CFR Part 180. The District is not performing required procedures, as a result, vendors that are not eligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities could be selected. Perspective Information: As part of the requirements under the Uniform Guidance, a review of vendors charged to the school lunch fund and therefore represent purchases with federal dollars was performed. Of the District’s vendors charged to the fund, none were suspended or debarred from participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Questioned Cost: None. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the District review the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.214 and 2 CFR Part 180 and ensure that a review of the eligibility of potential vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs or activities is performed prior to disbursing funds to the vendor. Views of the Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Business Manager will review these requirements with the Sr. Account Clerk. The Sr. Account Clerk will verify that all vendors are eligible to participate in the federal assistance program on an annual basis. Specifically, a note will be entered on the vendor record in the accounting system each time a purchase order is issued, which will detail that the proper verification was performed.

Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement. Information on Federal Program: U.S. Department of Agriculture Child Nutrition Cluster (National School Breakfast Program, School Lunch Program, School Lunch Program Supply Chain- COVID 19 Assistance Listing numbers 10.553 and 10.555) passed through the New York State Education Department. Criteria: CFR Section 200.318 stipulates that a non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable state, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in Part 200 Subpart D. Additionally, 2 CFR Section 200.214 refers to executive orders 12549 and 12689 as well as 2 CFR Part 180, which stipulates that no awards, subawards, or contracts be awarded to parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from receiving or participating in Federal assistance programs or activities. Statement of Condition: During our discussions with management and testing of various vendors, we noted that the District is not following its procurement procedures for the Child Nutrition program purchases and is not verifying the eligibility of vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs on an annual basis. Statement of Cause: The District did not review compliance requirements related to procurement outlined in 2 CFR Section 200.314 and 2 CFR part 180. Statement of Effect: The District is not in compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.214. The District is not performing required procedures; as a result, vendors that are not eligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities could be selected or the District could be overpaying for goods and services. Questioned Costs: None Perspective Information: As part of required procurement testing, a review of vendors charged to the school lunch fund and therefore represented purchases with federal dollars was performed. Of the District’s vendors charged to the fund, none were suspended or debarred from participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: We recommend that the District review the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.214 and 2 CFR part 180 and ensure that their procurement procedures are being followed and that a review of the eligibility of potential vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs or activities is performed prior to disbursing funds to the vendor. Views of the Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The District will review the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.214 and 2 CFR Part 180 and ensure procurement procedures are being followed. Further, the District will perform and document a review of the eligibility of vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs. The District is in the process of corrective action, and is working toward compliance.

Procurement Information on Federal Program: U.S. Department of Agriculture Child Nutrition Cluster (National School Breakfast Program, School Lunch Program, Supply Chain, noncash assistance, Summer Food Service Program Assistance Listing numbers 10.553, 10.555 and 10.559) passed through the New York State Education Department. U.S. Department of Education Special Education Cluster (Special Education – Grants to States and Special Education – Preschool Grants Assistance Listing Numbers 84.027 and 84.173) passed through the New York State Education Department. Criteria: 2 CFR Section 200.214 refers to executive orders 12549 and 12689 as well as 2 CFR Part 180, which stipulates that no awards, subawards, or contracts be awarded to parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from receiving or participating in Federal Assistance programs or activities. Statement of Condition: During our discussions with management, we noted that the District is not verifying the eligibility of vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs on an annual basis. Additionally, we noted that there was no verification that procurements through state contracts were invoiced to the District at the contract rates. Statement of Cause: The District did not review compliance requirements related to procurement outlined in 2 CFR Section 200.214 and 2 CFR part 180. Statement of Effect: The District is not in compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.214 and 2 CFR Part 180. The District is not performing required procedures, as a result, vendors that are not eligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities could be selected. The District could also be overpaying for goods. Questioned Costs: None Perspective Information: A review of vendors charged to the major programs determined no vendors were suspended or debarred. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the District review the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.214 and 2 CFR Part 180 and ensure that a review of the eligibility of potential vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs or activities is performed prior to disbursing funds to the vendor. This should be verified on an annual basis. Additionally, we recommend that a review of invoices as compared to bidding/contracting documentation be performed prior to payment. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Effective July 1, 2025 the Executive Director of Business & Human Resources, Kevin J. Polunci will review and and verify the eligibility of vendors that participate in federal assistance programs and on an annual basis. Additionally, the District will review the eligibility of potential vendors that participate in federal assistance programs and compare invoices to bidding/contracts prior to payments.

Information on Federal Program: U.S. Department of Agriculture Child Nutrition Cluster (National School Lunch Program, School Breakfast Program, non-cash commodities, Summer Food Service Program, Assistance Listing numbers 10.553, 10.555 and 10.559) passed through the New York State Education Department. Criteria: 2 CFR Section 200.214 refers to executive orders 12549 and 12689 as well as 2 CFR Part 180, which stipulates that no awards, subawards, or contracts be awarded to parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from receiving or participating in Federal Assistance programs or activities. Statement of Condition: During our discussions with management, we noted that the District is not verifying the eligibility of vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs on an annual basis for all school lunch vendors. Statement of Effect: The District is not in compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.214. The District is not performing required procedures, as a result, vendors that are not eligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities could be selected. Questioned Costs: None Perspective Information: As a result of inquiry, the District performed a review of all vendors charged to the school lunch fund, none were suspended or debarred from participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the District review the requirements of 2 CFR Section 20.214 and 2 CFR Part 180 and ensure that a review of the eligibility of potential vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs or activities is performed prior to disbursing funds to the vendor. This should be verified on an annual basis. Views of the Responsible Officials: The District will begin verifying the status of all vendors paid with federal funds to ensure they are not suspended or debarred.

Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement Information on Federal Program: U.S Department of Agriculture Child Nutrition Cluster (National School Breakfast Program, School Lunch Program, and Special Milk Program for Children Assistance Listing numbers 10.553, 10.555, and 10.556) passed through the New York State Education Department. Criteria: CFR Section 200.318 stipulates that a non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable state, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in Part 200 Subpart D. Additionally, 2 CFR Section 200.214 refers to executive orders 12549 and 12689 as well as 2 CFR Part 180, which stipulates that no awards, subawards, or contracts be awarded to parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from receiving or participating in Federal assistance programs or activities. Statement of Condition: During our discussions with management and reverification of use of same vendors as previous year, we noted that the District is not verifying the eligibility of vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs on an annual basis. They are however, checking the status of any new vendors. In addition, the District does not have any procedures in place to verify purchases against the bidding documents for pricing. Statement of Cause: The District did not review compliance requirements related to procurement outlined in 2 CFR Section 200.314 and 2 CFR part 180. Statement of Effect: The District is not in compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.214 and 2 CFR Part 180. The District is not performing required procedures, as a result, vendors that are not eligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities could be selected or the District could be overpaying for goods and services. The District could also be overpaying for goods as the bid documentation is not being verified against the purchases made. Questioned Costs: None Perspective Information: As part of required follow up of prior year audit findings, a review of vendors charged to the school lunch fund and therefore represent purchases with federal dollars was performed. Of the District’s vendors charged to the fund, none were suspended or debarred from participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Also as part of the required follow up of prior year audit findings, inquiries were performed to determine if bidding and procurement procedures were being followed, and they were not. Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: We recommend that the District review the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.214 and 2 CFR part 180 and ensure that a review of the eligibility of potential vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs or activities is performed prior to disbursing funds to the vendor. The District should also implement procedures to verify their purchases against bidding documentation to ensure that they are paying the correct, bid upon price for their purchases. Views of the Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The District will monitor vendors to ensure they are able to accept federal monies.

2025-003: Procurement Procedures (Significant Deficiency and Noncompliance) Federal Program: IDEA Special Education Federal ALN: 84.027/84.173 Criteria: Under 2 CFR §200.318-§200.320, non-federal entities must conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition and must follow documented procurement procedures consistent with federal standards. Additionally, 2 CFR §200.214 (previously §200.213) requires non-federal entities to verify that contractors are not suspended or debarred from doing business with the federal government. This verification may be accomplished by checking the System for Award Management (SAM.gov) or obtaining a certification from the vendor. Condition and Context: During our testing of procurement transactions, we identified two (2) contracts in which bids were not solicited as required by the District's procurement policy and Uniform Guidance. In addition, suspension and debarment checks were not performed or documented for these vendors prior to contract award. Cause: The exceptions occurred because procurement procedures were not consistently followed, and management did not perform or document required suspension/debarment verifications prior to contract execution. This may have been due to oversight or lack of staff training regarding Uniform Guidance procurement requirements. Effect or Potential Effect: Failure to solicit bids and perform suspension/debarment checks increases the risk of noncompliance with federal regulations, potential ineligible costs charged to federal programs, and diminished assurance that contracts are awarded fairly and to responsible parties. Questioned Costs: None. Identification as a Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that management strengthen procurement procedures to ensure compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements. Specifically: - Solicit bids or proposals in accordance with applicable competitive procurement thresholds; - Perform and document suspension and debarment checks (e.g., through SAM.gov) prior to awarding contracts; and - Provide staff training on federal procurement standards and maintain documentation supporting compliance for each federally funded procurement. Responsible Official's Response: Please see the last page of this report for the response to this finding.

Special Education Cluster – Procurement Information on Federal Program: U.S. Department of Education Special Education Cluster (Special Education – Grants to State (IDEA, Part B) and Special Education – Preschool Grants (IDEA Preschool) Assistance Listing numbers 84.027 and 84.173) passed through the New York State Education Department. Criteria: 2 CFR Section 200.214 refers to executive orders 12549 and 12689 as well as 2CFR Part 180, which stipulates that no awards, subawards, or contracts be awarded to parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from receiving or participating in Federal Assistance programs or activities. Statement of Condition: During our discussions with management, we noted that the District is not verifying the eligibility of vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs on an annual basis. Statement of Cause: The District did not review compliance requirements related to procurement outlined in 2 CFR Section 200.214 and 2 CFR part 180. Statement of Effect: The District is not in compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.214 and 2 CFR Part 180. The District is not performing required procedures, as a result, vendors that are not eligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities could be selected. Questioned Costs: None Perspective Information: As part of required procurement testing, a review of vendors charged to the special education cluster and therefore represents purchases with federal dollars was performed. Of the District’s vendors charged to the fund, none were suspended or debarred from participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The District did perform a retrospective review of all vendors associated with federal grants, and encountered no vendors that were suspended or debarred. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the District review the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.214 and 2 CFR Part 180 and ensure that a review of the eligibility of potential vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs or activities is performed prior to disbursing funds to the vendor. This should be verified on an annual basis. Views of the Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Effective September 2025, the District has implemented a procedure to perform this review on vendors associated with federal grants annually.

U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Assistance Listing #21.027 COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Procurement, Suspension, & Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance and Noncompliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR 200.318 requires the auditee to use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect State, local and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and standards. 2 CFR 200.214 restricts making federal awards with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from participating in Federal awards. Condition: The Hospital did not have a written procurement policy in place that aligned with all federal regulations. The Hospital also did not review vendors to ensure that they were not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from participating in federal awards. Cause: While the Hospital did have a policy in place, the policy did not follow all federal regulations, or include policies of determining if vendors are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from participating in Federal awards. Effect: Noncompliance with the Uniform Guidance could jeopardize future federal funding. Questioned Costs: None reported Context: A nonstatistical sample of 3 vendors out of 9 vendors with actual or anticipated expenditures greater than the federal micro purchase threshold were tested for procurement testing. Repeat Finding from Prior Years: No. Recommendation: The Hospital should update their procurement policy to align with all federal requirements outlined in 2 CFR 200.318. We also recommend that the Hospital reviews vendors that are used for federal awards to ensure that they are not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from participating in Federal awards in accordance with 2 CFR 200.214. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.

Reference Number: 2025-006 Program Name: Special Education Cluster Description: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Condition: During our testing of procurement, the District did not retain documentation demonstrating the suspension and debarment status of two (2) vendors paid. While the District verbally stated that SAM.gov checks were performed, no evidence was available for examination. Criteria: 2 CFR 200.214 requires Districts to ensure, and retain evidence, that the verification process was complete. Verification can be documented through 1) a screenshot or printout from SAM.gov, 2) An official certification from the vendor, or 3) a written record the verification was completed. Cause: The District’s procurement policy does not formally state that retention of the search is required. Effect: The District can’t demonstrate compliance with federal procurement requirements. Questioned Costs: None. Identification of a Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Auditors’ Recommendation: We recommend that the District update their procurement policy to include that retention of the search is required. Views of Responsible Officials: See attachment for District’s corrective action plan.

2025: Procurement Procedures (Significant Deficiency and Noncompliance) Federal Program: American Recovery Plan Act Federal ALN: 21.027 Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.214 (previously 200.213) requires the City to verify that contractors are not suspended or debarred from doing business with the federal government. This verification may be accomplished by checking the System for Award Management (SAM.gov) or obtaining a certification from the vendor. Condition and Context: During our testing, we identified two (2) transactions for which suspension and debarment checks were not performed or documented prior to contract award. Cause: Undetermined. Effect or Potential Effect: Failure to perform suspension/debarment checks increases the risk of noncompliance with federal regulations, potential ineligible costs changed to federal programs, and diminished assurance that contracts are awards fairly and to responsible parties. Questioned Costs: None. Identification as a Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that management strengthen procurement procedures to ensure compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements. Specifically: - Perform and document suspension and debarment checks (e.g., through SAM.gov) prior to awarding contracts; and - Provide staff training on federal procurement standards and maintain documentation supporting compliance for each federally funded procurement. Responsible Official's Response: Please see the last page of this report for the response to this finding.

2025-002 Special Education Cluster: Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: United States Department of Education Federal program Name: Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Unknown Pass-through Agency: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction Pass-Through Numbers: 2024/2025-585264-DPI-FLOW-341, 2024/2025-585264-DPI-PRESCH-347 Award Period: 07/01/2024 – 06/30/2025 Compliance Requirements Affected: Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance, Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion) Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR 200.214 requires non-Federal entities to follow suspension and debarment regulations outlined in 2 CFR part 180. When a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transactions with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity, as described in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Condition: During our testing we noted the District does not have a consistent procedure in place for verifying that vendors are not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Questioned costs: None Context: In our testing of suspension and debarment, we noted that the District did not retain documentation related to suspension and debarment for two of the four vendors that were selected for testing. Cause: The District did not follow their Federal Funds Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Policy related to appropriate methods of procurement and suspension and debarment. Effect: The District could contract with a vendor that has been suspended or debarred from receiving Federal Funds. Repeat Finding: 2024-005 Recommendation: We recommend that the District reviews its procedures to ensure the District’s suspension and debarment policy is being consistently followed. We further recommend that the District requires all grant administrators to receive training on Federal suspension and debarment regulations. View of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with this audit finding. See corrective action plan.

Finding: 2025-003 Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment (Significant Deficiency) Federal Agency(ies): United States Department of Agriculture Federal Program(s): Partnerships for Climate-Smart Commodities Assistance Listing Number(s): 10.937 Pass-through Entity (if applicable): N/A Award Identification Number and Year: NR233A750004G045 (2023) Criteria or Specific Requirement:  2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(iv) allows for an increased micro-purchase threshold of up to $50,000 only if the non-Federal entity self-certifies that it meets specific conditions, including internal controls, organizational risk, and procurement oversight capacity.  2 CFR 200.214 prohibits contracting with or making subawards to parties that are suspended or debarred, and entities are required to verify that contractors are not listed on the System for Award Management (SAM.gov) at the time of contact/award.  2 CFR 200.318(c)(1) requires non-Federal entities to maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the performance of employees engaged in the selection, award, and administration of contracts. Condition: Our testing identified the following exceptions: 1. CIF did not maintain a comprehensive written procurement, suspension, and debarment policy during the fiscal year under audit. A draft policy was developed during the audit planning phase and is pending approval from the Board of Directors. 2. The draft policy self-certified a micro-purchase threshold of $50,000, which is not appropriate given that CIF does not meet all criteria required under 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(iv), and the elevated threshold is excessive relative to the size and scope of the Organization’s operations. 3. CIF provided SAM.gov suspension and debarment checks for contractors in our sample; however, the checks were undated, and we were unable to confirm that the verification was performed at the time of contract execution. 4. CIF did not maintain a conflict of interest policy during the fiscal year under audit, as required by 2 CFR 200.318(c)(1). While a draft conflict of interest policy was included in the draft procurement policy, it was not in effect during the year under audit. Cause: These conditions occurred because the Organization did not have formalized procurement policies and procedures in place throughout the year. Effect or Potential Effect: Failure to maintain compliant procurement and conflict of interest policies and procedures increases the risk that Federal funds may be spent in a manner inconsistent with Uniform Guidance requirements. Questioned Costs: $172,572 (all contractual expenses changed to ALN #10.937) Context: We tested a statistically valid sample of contractual relationships charged to Federal awards. The deficiencies noted were consistent across the sample population, indicating a systemic issue rather than isolated exceptions. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: Yes, repeat of Finding 2024-006Recommendation: We recommend that management: 1. Finalize and implement a comprehensive procurement, suspension, and debarment policy that incorporates all requirements of 2 CFR 200.318–200.320. 2. Amend the draft policy to adopt a micro-purchase threshold appropriate for the Organization’s size and risk profile, consistent with 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(iv). 3. Ensure that SAM.gov checks are performed and documented with date-stamps at the time of contract execution. 4. Adopt and enforce a formal conflict of interest policy as required by 2 CFR 200.318(c)(1), and amend the policy to require annual (written) reaffirmations from all employees and Board members.

Criteria: Uniform Guidance (2 CFR §200.214 and §200.318(h)) prohibits non-federal entities from contracting with or making subawards to parties that are suspended or debarred. Entities must verify vendor eligibility by: Checking SAM.gov, Obtaining a vendor certification, or Adding a clause in contracts stating the vendor is not suspended or debarred. Condition: The Town did not have adequate internal controls to ensure compliance with the suspension and debarment requirements of the Uniform Guidance when procuring goods or services using federal funds. Cause: The Town had not established written procedures or implemented controls to ensure required suspension and debarment checks were performed and documented during procurement involving federal funds. Effect: Without controls to ensure compliance with suspension and debarment requirements, the Town is at increased risk of awarding federal funds to ineligible vendors. This could result in unallowable costs, questioned costs, or potential repayment of federal funds. Recommendation: The Town should develop and implement written policies and procedures requiring documentation of suspension and debarment checks before entering into contracts funded with federal awards. Acceptable methods include maintaining SAM.gov eligibility verification screenshots, obtaining vendor certifications, or including appropriate contract language. Views of responsible officials: See management’s responses to findings on Page 78.

74 Section III - Findings and Questioned Costs for Federal Awards (Continued) Significant Deficiency 2025-002 - PROCUREMENT, SUSPENSION & DEBARMENT: Procurement Policy Federal Program Information: US Department of Agriculture Direct Award ALN: - 10.760 Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities Criteria: Per 2 CFR Section 200.214, non-federal entities are subject to the nonprocurement and suspension regulations restricting awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred or suspended. Condition: The Town does not have a formal procedure to determine that contractors are not debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Cause: The Municipality is working on adopting an updated federal procurement policy in response to the prior year finding, but it has not been adopted yet. Effect: Transactions could occur that did not comply with federal regulations. Identification of Questioned Costs: None identified. Context: The finding was based on requesting the Town’s policies and procedures related to federal compliance and therefore was not the result of a statistical sample. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding of 2023-003. Recommendation: The auditor recommends that the Town obtain an understanding of the required procedures in the Code of Federal Regulations as applicable to its federal programs, create and formally adopt those required procedures. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: Please see the Corrective Action Plan issued by Town of Bridgewater, Vermont.

NONCOMPLIANCE WITH PROCUREMENT, SUSPENSION & DEBARMENT REQUIREMENTS, CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS; AL No. 21.027, YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2025 Criteria: Per section 13 of Treasury’s Final Rule FAQs and 2 CFR 200.214, counties must comply with the procurement standards set forth in 2 CFR 200.318, through 2 CFR 200.327, when using their SLFRF award funds to procure goods and services to carry out the objectives of their SLFRF award. In addition, 2 CFR 200.214, prohibits recipients from using SLFRF funds to enter into subawards and contracts with parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs. Condition: The city did not verify that program recipients/participants were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participation in the program. Cause: The city does not have procurement policies and procedures in place that allows it to comply with procurement standards outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Non-compliance with program terms and conditions. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should develop procedures that will provide reasonable assurance that procurement of goods and services are made in compliance with applicable federal regulations and other procurement requirements specific to a federal award or subaward, and that no subaward, contract, or agreement for purchase of goods or services is made with any suspended or debarred party. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.

2025-006 Procurement, Suspension & Debarment – Special Education Cluster (IDEA) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Program Name: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) Assistance Listing Number: 84.027, 84.173 Pass-Through Agency: Wisconsin Department of Instruction Pass Through Numbers: 2025-445138-DPI-ES3-342, 2025-445138-DPI-FLOW-341, 2025-445138-DPI-PRESCH-347 Award Period: July 1, 2024 – June 30, 2025 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal control over Compliance, Material noncompliance (Qualified Opinion) Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR 200.320 Methods of Procurement state that if the small purchases method is used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (at least 2). Requests for proposals must be publicized and identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance. Proposals must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified offerors. Any response to publicized requests for proposals must be considered to the maximum extent practical. Additionally 2 CFR 200.214 requires non-Federal entities to follow suspension and debarment regulations outlined in 2 CFR part 180. When a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transactions with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity, as described in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Condition: During our testing of procurement transactions of the program, we noted that the District was not consistently following the procurement policy, specifically related to small purchases threshold. These purchases were not supported by an adequate number of quotes (at least two) or proposals to ensure the District is prudent with the monies used towards the program. Additionally, we noted the District does not have procedures in place for verifying that vendors are not debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded. Questioned Costs: None Section III – Findings and Questioned Costs – Major Federal and State Programs (Continued) Context: During our testing of procurement transactions of the program, we noted the District was not consistently following the procurement policy, specifically related to small purchases threshold. In our sample of 3 vendors subject to procurement requirements, we noted the District did not obtain and/or retain documentation for an adequate number of price quotes for two vendors. In our testing of suspension and debarment, we noted that the District did not retain documentation related to suspension and debarment for all four vendors that were selected for testing. Cause: The District did not follow their Federal Funds Procurement policy related to the appropriate methods of procurement. Effect: Obtaining price quotes or proposals from an adequate number of vendors allows the District to use federal funds in the most fiscally responsible way. The lack of quotes and proposals may cause the District to over pay for supplies or services. Additionally, the District could contract with a vendor that has been suspended or debarred from receiving Federal funds. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the District review their policies and procedures related to Uniform Guidance and the District's Purchasing Policy. We also recommend the District evaluate current procedures and controls to ensure that policies are consistently followed and properly documented in accordance with District policies. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the finding.

2025-001 –Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Cluster / Program: Research & Development (R&D) / ALN 19.UO9, 19.U10: The MITRE Corporation – U.S. Department of State Grantor: - Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) / DoD, National Science Foundation (NSF) / U.S. Department of State Award Name: EE Tang MPI PennST DARPA Monolithic GaN, Social Networks and Migration in Nepal / Conflict Observatory – Sudan, Conflict Observatory – Ukraine Award Number: AWD0011529, AWD0007921 / AWD0011946, AWD0010905 Award Year: FY2025 Assistance Listing Numbers: 12.910, 47.075 / 19.U09, 19.U10 Assistance Listing Titles: Research and Technology Development, Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences / U.S Department of State Pass-Through Entities: N/A / Pennsylvania State University Criteria Per 2 CFR 200.214, when entering into a covered transaction with an entity, the auditee must have established procedures to verify that the entity is not suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Condition We selected a sample of 25 transactions within the R&D cluster and 5 transactions within ALN 19.U09, 19.U10 and noted two selections within R&D cluster and one selection within ALN 19.U09, 19.U10 where debarment checks were not performed prior to entering into the transaction. Cause Due to the manual nature of the debarment checks, there was an oversight and the vendors were not screened at the time of set up due to human error. Effect New vendors are not consistently checked for suspension and debarment prior to the University entering into a transaction with the vendors as required by the regulation stated above. Questioned Costs None noted. Repeat Finding in the Prior Year No Recommendation PwC recommends additional training for employees responsible for suspension and debarment checks to ensure established procedures are followed when entering into a covered transaction with an entity. Additionally, we recommend considering an automated process where when a new vendor is entered into the system, a debarment check is automatically initiated.

FINDING 2025-002 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.027X Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 21611-010-PN01, 22611-010-PN01, 23611-010-PN01, 24611-010-PN01, 22611-010-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2023-004. Condition and Context Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., a grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Upon inquiry of the School Corporation in order to review the procedures in place for verifying that a person with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, the School Corporation did provide documentation that suspension and debarment requirements were verified for one of the tested vendors. No documentation was provided for the remaining covered transactions, totaling $329,876. The lack of proper internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 EAST ALLEN COUNTY SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." 2 CFR 200.214 states: "Non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation to ensure all vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were verified prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not all verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the provision of federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the reduction of future federal funding to the School Corporation. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 EAST ALLEN COUNTY SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish and implement an effective system of internal controls to ensure all vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 are verified prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

2025-001 U.S. Department of Education, Assistance Listing #84.027/84.173 Special Education Cluster (IDEA) Program and U.S. Department of Treasury, Assistance Listing #21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLRF) Program for the period of July 1, 2024, through June 30, 2025 Criteria: Uniform Guidance section 2 CFR §200.317-200.327 Procurement Standards, requires purchases exceeding the micro-purchase threshold of $10,000 to follow small purchase procedures, which require obtaining price or rate quotations from an adequate number of qualified sources (§200.320) prior to entering into a contract. In addition, 2 CFR Part 180 and 2 CFR §200.214 require non-federal entities to verify if contractors are suspended or debarred (e.g., Sam.gov check or certification) and include appropriate contract clauses in applicable contracts. Condition: The School Department did not obtain price or rate quotations for two projects that exceeded the micro-purchase threshold. Additionally, the Department did not perform, or document required suspension and debarment procedures for the contractor (e.g., verification against SAM.gov, obtaining certifications, or including contract clauses). The City did not perform, or document required suspension and debarment procedures for the contractor (e.g., verification against SAM.gov, obtaining certifications, or including contract clauses) for three of the six contracts tested. Cause: School staff were not aware the projects would be funded with federal funds and did not ensure compliance with federal requirements for competitive pricing and suspension/debarment verification. City staff were not aware projects covered under the SLRF definition of “revenue replacement”, which excludes most procurement requirements, are still required to follow 2 CFR Part 180 and 2 CFR §200.214. Effect: Failure to obtain competitive quotes and verify contractor eligibility to receive Federal funds increases the risk of noncompliance, inefficient use of federal funds, and potential disallowance of costs. Known Questioned Costs: $61,891 for #84.027/84.173; $51,750 for #21.027 Likely Questioned Costs: $12,799 for #21.027 Recommendation: We recommend training staff on procurement and suspension/debarment requirements and implementing a pre-award compliance checklist. We also recommend increasing communication between grant personnel and facilities management personnel so all parties are aware which projects will be funded with federal funds.

Assistance Listing, Federal Agency, and Program Name - 21.027, U.S. Department of Treasury, COVID 19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Award Identification Number and Year - H4HRGP33345 Pass-through Entity - State of Colorado, Department of Local Affairs, for the benefit of the Division of Housing Finding Type - Material weakness Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.303, the recipient must establish, document, and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the recipient or subrecipient is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should align with the guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government,” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework," issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition - Management did not have controls in place to ensure documentation was maintained evidencing the organization's verfication that contractors are not suspended or debarred from participating in a federally funded activity. Questioned Costs - N/A If questioned costs are not determinable, description of why known questioned costs were undetermined or otherwise could not be reported - N/A Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - While gaining an understanding of the organization's internal controls, we noted management was unable to provide documentation to support that checks for suspension and debarment occurred before the organization entered into a covered transaction. We were able to verify in our sample testing that management did not enter into contracts with individuals or organizations suspended or debarred from participating in federal programs. Cause and Effect - A lack of controls could result in material noncompliance with federal procurement standards. Recommendation - We recommend management retain documented evidence that checks for suspension and debarment have occurred before entering into a covered transaction with outside contractors. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - Management concurs with the finding. We acknowledge that, for one federal program under the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds program (Assistance Listing 21.027), the required suspension and debarment verification was performed; however, the supporting documentation evidencing this verification was not retained in the contract file. This represents a documentation lapse rather than a control deficiency. Volunteers of America Colorado (VOAC) routinely performs suspension and debarment verifications for all applicable vendors, contractors, and subrecipients receiving federal funds in accordance with 2 CFR 200.214. This requirement applies to entities and individuals awarded federally funded contracts or subawards exceeding the micro purchase threshold and excludes routine commercial vendors for indirect administrative costs or purchases under $10,000. To strengthen compliance documentation and ensure consistent audit support, VOAC has implemented the following corrective actions: 1.Policy Enhancement: The procurement procedure has been updated to explicitly require saving and retaining a time stamped screenshot or PDF confirmation of each SAM.gov verification showing the verification date and results. Where applicable, contractors subject to 2 CFR 200.214 must also provide a self certification statement within the executed agreement. 2.Centralized Recordkeeping: Verification evidence will be maintained in both the individual contract file and the centralized grant management system. 3.Annual Training and Refresher: Procurement and grants management staff will participate in annual training to reinforce 2 CFR 200.214 requirements and best practices for documentation and record retention. Management believes this was an isolated documentation lapse prior to the current audit period when the contractor was selected, and that the actions taken since have resolved the issue and will ensure continued compliance.

Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Campus:Sacramento Cluster name/program: Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Cluster Federal Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.561 Federal Award Identification Number: 21-3068 and 24-3069 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Passed through Entity: State of California Department of Social Services Award Year: July 1, 2024 – June 30, 2025 Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.214, recipients and subrecipients are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, as well as 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict making Federal awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from receiving or participating in Federal awards. Additionally, 2 CFR 180.300 requires non-federal entities (including state agencies administering federal programs like SNAP) to verify that contractors and subrecipients are not suspended or debarred from receiving federal funds CFR 200.303 also requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition and Context: During our testing of 2 procurement samples, it was noted that the program personnel did not check if the vendors were suspended or debarred from receiving federal funds before entering into a covered transaction, nor was a certification from the vendor about verification of suspension and debarment collected from the vendor. We noted the vendors were not suspended or debarred and there were no other exceptions noted in the procurement, suspension and debarment testing. Cause and Effect: The control over the verification that vendors are not suspended or debarred prior to entering into a covered transaction was not designed effectively. As such, the suspension and debarment check requirements were not implemented for all procurement methods for this program. Questioned Costs: None Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding: No Recommendations: We recommend the University implement controls to verify the suspension and debarment status of all vendors prior to entering covered transactions, as well as maintaining evidence of the suspension and debarment check in the procurement file of each vendor. Views of Responsible Officials: The University concurs with the recommendations. The University will review and enhance its procedures and internal controls to verify the suspension and debarment status of all vendors prior to entering covered transactions, as well as maintaining evidence of the suspension and debarment check in the procurement file of each vendor.

FINDING 2025-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2024, FY2025 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 15 CLOVERDALE COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $150,000 per Indiana Code. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: micro-purchases, typically for those purchases of $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation had not designed or implemented adequate policies or procedures to ensure that proper procurement procedures for small purchases were followed. The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes from multiple vendors for its audit period expenditures with each of the three vendors tested in the small purchases category. Documentation detailing the history of procurement, including rationale to limit competition at the time of the expenditure(s) was not provided for audit. Suspension and Debarment Nonfederal entities and contractors are subject to nonprocurement debarment and suspension regulations. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or are ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities. This is done by checking SAM Exclusions, collecting a certification from that entity, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity. The School Corporation had not designed or implemented adequate policies or procedures to ensure that applicable vendors who received federal funds over certain thresholds were not suspended or debarred from participating in federal awards programs. There were three vendors subject to suspension and debarment requirements during the audit period that were not procured through the School Corporation's affiliated Educational Services Center for cooperative purchasing. The School Corporation did not perform procedures to ensure the vendors were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities for one of these three vendors. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Noncompliance was isolated to small purchases for procurement and one vendor noted for suspension and debarment. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 16 CLOVERDALE COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. . . . (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small Purchases– (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 200.214 states: "Non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 17 CLOVERDALE COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not developed nor implemented an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. The Food Service Director indicated that some of these purchases may have been emergency situations but was unaware of the need to document the rationale at the time of the transaction if competition was limited for small purchases procurements. Effect The lack of an internal control system enabled material noncompliance to occur and remain undetected. Noncompliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could enable small purchases made by the School Corporation to be uncompetitive and could lead to contracting with vendors who are suspended or debarred from receiving federal grant funding. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended the School Corporation's management strengthen its system of internal controls over small purchase requirements to ensure that an adequate number of price or rate quotes are obtained before purchase. Additionally, if procurements are made in emergency or extenuating circumstances, documentation at the time of the transaction must be retained for audit to justify limiting competition. We also recommended that vendors with a single or aggregate transaction amounts of $25,000 per fiscal year are verified for suspension and debarment prior to entering into the transaction and/or contract. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

Criteria or specific requirement: CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, §200.214 specifies that recipients and subrecipients are subject to the nonprocurement debarment and suspension regulations related to subawards and contracts with certain parties. The non-federal entity must have controls in place to ensure subawards and contracts are not entered into with suspended or debarred parties. Condition: Verification support did not indicate the date verification procedures were performed. As a result, we were unable to verify this was performed prior to engaging with the contractor. Questioned costs: None. Context: Suspension and debarment verification support from SAM.gov did not explicitly state the date the verification procedures were performed. Support was not available to ensure verification procedures were performed prior to the date CAPECO engaged with the contractor. Cause: During the verification process, management failed to include a date stamp for the online print out to support the date the verification procedures were performed. Effect: Suspension and debarment verification support from SAM.gov did not explicitly state the date the verification procedures were performed. Repeat finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend CAPECO ensure documentation is retained to support the date the suspension and debarment verification procedures are performed. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

2025-001 – Suspension and Debarment (repeat comment) Finding Type: Significant deficiency in internal control over compliance Program: ALN 97.044 – Assistance to Firefighters Grant • Grant number EMW-2022-FG-01118 • Grant number EMW-2023-FG-03417 • Grant number EMW-2023-FG-02529 Criteria: As required by 2 CFR 200.214, Non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from receiving or participating in Federal awards. Condition: The vendors used for these grants were not checked for suspension and debarment prior to execution of the contract. Cause/Effect: Although a policy has been adopted requiring a check the suspension and debarment status prior to entering into contracts, the internal control over this process was not operating as designed. Questioned Cost: None. Recommendation: We recommend that the City update procedures to ensure that a check of suspension and debarment status is obtained prior to entering into a covered transaction. View of Responsible Official: Management is in agreement with this recommendation.

Failure to Verify Contractor Suspension and Debarment Status. Condition: The City did not verify the suspension or debarment status of a contractor prior to awarding a federally funded contract during the audit period. Criteria: Federal regulations (2 CFR 200.214) require recipients of federal funds to ensure that contractors are not suspended or debarred prior to awarding a contract. Verification may be documented through a SAM.gov search, a contractor certification, or a contract clause addressing suspension and debarment. Cause: The City's current procurement procedures do not specifically outline how suspension and debarment checks should be performed or documented. Staff were unaware of the requirement. Effect: The City increased the risk of awarding federal funds to a contractor who may be suspended or debarred, which could result in noncompliance with federal regulations and potential disallowance of costs. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: We recommend the City update its procurement procedures to include a clear process for verifying and documenting suspension and debarment status for all federally funded contracts. Acceptable documentation includes a printed SAM.gov search, a contractor certification, or a contract clause addressing the requirement. Management Response: Management agrees with the finding. The City will revise its procurement procedures and train staff to ensure verification is completed and retained for all federally funded procurements.

2025-004 Suspension & Debarment – Special Education Cluster (IDEA) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Program Name: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) Assistance Listing Number: 84.027, 84.173 Pass-Through Agency: Wisconsin Department of Instruction Pass Through Numbers: 2025-133675-DPI-FLOW-341, 2025-133675-DPI-PRESCH-347 Award Period: July 1, 2024 – June 30, 2025 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Suspension and Debarment Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR 200.214 requires non-Federal entities to follow suspension and debarment regulations outlined in 2 CFR part 180. When a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transactions with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity, as described in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Condition: During our testing of procurement transactions of the program, we noted that the District did not retain documentation of verification that that vendors are not debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded. Questioned Costs: None Context: In sample of 5 vendors contracts subject to suspension and debarment, we noted that the District did not retain documentation related to suspension and debarment for all vendors that were selected for testing. Cause: The District did not retain documentation following their Federal Funds Procurement policy related to the appropriate methods of procurement. Effect: The District could contract with a vendor that has been suspended or debarred from receiving Federal funds. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the District evaluate current procedures and controls to ensure that policies are consistently followed and properly documented in accordance with District policies. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the finding.

Reference Number: 2025-019 Prior Year Finding: 2024-052 Federal Agency: National Science Foundation State Agency: Higher Education Policy Commission Federal Program: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 47.076 Award Number and Year: 1834586 (09/01/2018 – 08/31/2025) Compliance Requirement: Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance Criteria or Specific Requirement: Compliance: 2 CFR 200.214 Suspension and Debarment restricts awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. 2 CFR 180.300 states that an entity may determine suspension and debarment status by: (a) Checking SAM (System for Award Management) Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person Control: Per 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: The Higher Education Policy Commission (HEPC) did not properly verify and document the suspension and debarment status of subrecipients. Context: Nine transactions were selected for testing, including five for West Virginia University, one for Shepherd University, two for HEPC, and one for the Department of Agriculture. The following exceptions were noted: HEPC: • For 1 of 2 transactions selected for testing, HEPC performed the suspension and debarment verification after the subaward issuance date. The subaward was issued on 10/31/2023 but the suspension and debarment verification occurred on 12/4/2024. • For 1 of 2 transactions selected for testing, HEPC performed a suspension and debarment verification, but it was not dated and auditors were unable to determine if it occurred prior to issuance of the subaward. Questioned costs: None noted. The subrecipients were not suspended or disbarred. Cause: HEPC’s procedures and internal controls were not sufficient to ensure that it performed suspension and debarment verifications prior to issuance of subawards nor that documentation of the verifications was maintained and was complete. Effect: Failure to verify the suspension and debarment status of subrecipients prior to issuance of subawards could result in HEPC entering into agreements with subrecipients who are ineligible to participate in the program. Recommendation: HEPC should review and enhance its controls and procedures to ensure that it verifies the suspension and debarment status of subrecipients prior to issuance of subawards and include documentation for when the check occurred. Views of responsible officials: Management concurs with the finding and has developed a plan to correct the finding.

riteria: Per 2 CFR section 200.214, non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. Condition: Suspension and debarment compliance was not documented for four covered transactions. Cause: Procedures were not in place to document that the required suspension and debarment checks were performed at the time of the initial procurement but have since been implemented. Effect: The Town was at risk of awarding contracts to vendors not eligible to participate in federal awards programs. It was determined that none of the four vendors were suspended or debarred from federal awards. Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding from Prior Year: Yes; Finding 2024-002 Recommendation: The Town must ensure that there is documentation that all contractors under covered transactions that are performing services for Federal awards are not suspended or debarred. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.

Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Federal Program Name: COVID-19 Coronavirus Relief Fund Assistance Listing Number: 21.019 Award Period: March 3, 2021 – December 31, 2024 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency over Compliance and Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR 200.303 requires non-federal entities to establish and maintain internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with federal statutes and regulations, including procedures to verify and document vendor eligibility. 2 CFR 200.214 requires verification that vendors are not suspended or debarred prior to entering into covered transactions. Condition: The City does not have a documented control to perform and retain evidence of suspension and debarment verification (e.g., SAM.gov check or vendor certification) at the time of entering into covered transactions funded by federal awards. Management indicated that vendor eligibility checks are performed as part of standard operating practice; however, documentation evidencing the timing and performance of these checks was not retained. Questioned costs: None. Context: Four of the five covered transactions selected did not have proper supporting documentation for suspension and debarment procedures. Cause: For three of the transactions tested, the City relied on cooperative purchasing agreements. Accordingly, the City did not perform or retain documentation of its own suspension and debarment verification. For the remaining transaction, documentation evidencing suspension and debarment compliance was not retained. Effect: The City did not have a documented control to perform and retain evidence of suspension and debarment verification at the time of award, as required by 2 CFR 200.303. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the City obtain certifications from vendors stating their organization is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participation in federal assistance programs or document the procedures performed to verify the vendor is not identified as suspended or debarred on SAM.gov. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Suspension and Debarment Control Every Student Succeeds Act/Preschool Development Grants FFAL #93.434 Passed through from the Oklahoma Department of Human Services Suspension and Debarment Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.214, non federal entities must not enter into covered transactions with parties that are suspended or debarred. Acceptable verification methods include: • Checking the Exclusions section of SAM.gov, • Collecting vendor certifications regarding suspension/debarment status, or • Including appropriate suspension and debarment clauses in contracts. Internal controls must ensure these verifications are performed and documented. Condition: While a control appears to be in place for suspension and debarment, the Foundation could not support a control to verify whether all vendors paid with federal funds were suspended or debarred from participating in federal programs prior to entering into those transactions. For one procurement transactions selected for testing, the Foundation did not perform or document and retain any suspension and debarment verification procedures, such as checking SAM.gov, obtaining vendor certifications, or including suspension/debarment clauses in contracts. Cause: While the Foundation has established a formal internal control process to ensure suspension and debarment checks are performed before entering into covered transactions, it appears that not applicable transactions were captured in this process. Effect: The absence of a control that captures all applicable transactions creates a possibility that suspension and debarment requirements could occur and not be prevented or detected. Although no suspended or debarred vendors were identified through auditor performed SAM.gov searches, the deficiency increases the risk of entering into prohibited transactions in future periods. Context: We tested 1 vendor with procurement transactions totaling approximately $283,800 in federal expenditures. The Foundation did not maintain evidence of suspension and debarment verification for the one vendor tested. Independent auditor verification through SAM.gov confirmed that the vendor tested was not suspended or debarred. Nonstatistical sampling was used.Repeat Finding From Prior Year: No Questioned Costs: None, no vendor was listed as suspended or debarred. Recommendation: We recommend that The Foundation establish, document, and implement formal controls to ensure suspension and debarment verifications are completed prior to awarding covered transactions. Controls may include: • Performing and retaining SAM.gov verification printouts; • Obtaining annual or per transaction vendor certification statements; or • Incorporating a suspension and debarment clause into procurement contracts. Views of Responsible Officials: We do agree with the finding on suspension and debarment control on the FY2025 audit and have modified our procedures to include all covered transactions moving forward.

Assistance Listing, Federal Agency, and Program Name 21.027 COVID 19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds and 84.215 Innovative Approaches to Literacy Federal Award Identification Number and Year Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds SLFRP1027 Innovative Approaches to Literacy S215K230129 Pass through Entity 21.027 Michigan Strategic Fund; 20 Fathoms; Lean Rocket Lab; Talent First Inc; Lansing Economic Area Partnership; Michigan Economic Development Corporation 84.215 N/A Finding Type Significant Deficiency Repeat Finding No Criteria Recipients of federal awards are required to follow their internal purchasing policies, as well as comply with purchasing standards set forth in the Uniform Guidance. Per the University policy, all grant funded purchases in excess of $25,000 should be verified using SAM.gov the supplier is not suspended or debarred and the results should be retained in the purchase requisition. As Uniform Guidance restricts making federal awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from receiving or participating in Federal award (CFR 200.214). Condition In accordance with the University's policy, the University was unable to provide documentation to support its consideration of the suspension and debarment for the only vendor selected within Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds. In accordance with the University's policy, the University was unable to provide documentation to support its consideration of the suspension and debarment for the only vendor selected within Innovative Approaches to Literacy. Questioned Costs None If questioned costs are not determinable, description of why known questioned costs were undetermined or otherwise could not be reported N/A Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed N/A Context In the samples mentioned above, In accordance with University's policy the University did not maintain the appropriate documentation for the vendors to support their assessment of whether the vendors where included on Suspension or Debarment list. In either case the vendors included in the samples were not included in the Suspension and Debarment list and the University was allowed to contract with the vendor. Cause and Effect The University did not follow its policy to ensure that the documentation verifying the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Recommendation We recommend the University reviews its procedures and controls to ensure documentation of its compliance with the requirements under uniform guidance is maintained. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions A new custom validation warning will be added to the requisitions business process at the buyer approval step to require the Procurement Specialist to verify SAM.gov and attach the results as required for grant funded purchases. This custom validation will ensure that each required consideration of suspension and debarment occurs and is documented in the procurement record.