Reporting a determination that an applicant is not qualified for a Federal award.
Identification of the federal program: Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Pass-Through Entities: North Dakota Department of Health, South Dakota Department of Health and Minnesota Department of Health Assistance Listing: 93.155; COVID-19 Rural Health Research Centers Award Numbers: Various Award Year: FY 2021 – 2023 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” The Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.213 states, “Non-federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR Part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities”. In addition, Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.320 (c) states: “There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold; (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate.” Further, Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.320(a)(2) states: Small purchases – “The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity.” Condition: We noted the following matters during our testing of Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements: • A third-party vendor performed the suspension and debarment validation process for Sanford. The third-party vendor does not have a SOC 1 (System and Organization Controls) Report. For a portion of the year, Sanford relied on the suspension and debarment checks performed by the third-party vendor for results concluding no match without completing a validation control to ensure the results provided by the third-party vendor were accurate. • We noted instances where the vendor screening for suspension and debarment was not performed prior to setting up the vendor in the System and procuring the goods/services. Section III—Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) • For certain procurement transactions tested, we noted Sanford did not adhere to the compliance requirements and did not follow its procurement policy by maintaining documentation related to cost/price analysis or sole-source procurement and completing the sole-source justification forms timely. Cause: Sanford utilizes a third-party vendor to perform suspension and debarment checks on its vendors, both during the vendor setup process as well as ongoing monitoring of active vendors. Sanford did not add an additional validation control until August 2023 to ensure that the suspension and debarment checks performed by the third-party vendor aligned with the governmental suspension and debarment database when the search resulted in no match. In addition, Sanford did not follow its procurement policy and perform the vendor screening for suspension and debarment prior to setting up the vendor in the system and transacting with the vendors. Furthermore, Sanford, prior to entering into the procurement transaction, did not complete the sole-source justification forms, or maintain documentation to support the sole-sourced procurements for those procurement transactions that exceeded the small purchase threshold. Effect or potential effect: Sanford’s screening for suspension and debarment through the third-party vendor results may not be accurate for the period January 1, 2023 through July 31, 2023. Further, by not performing the vendor screening for suspension and debarment prior to transacting with the vendor, Sanford could have potentially entered into a business transaction with suspended or debarred parties. Sanford did not comply with the federal procurement requirements and its procurement policy by not maintaining adequate documentation to support the cost/price analysis or sole sourced vendor selections in addition to not timely completing the sole source justification forms. Section III—Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Questioned costs: $307,249 determined as the amount of the procurement expenditures included in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for two procurement transactions that had inadequate documentation to justify sole source selection. Context: To ensure compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.213, Sanford conducts both preventive and detective controls in its vendor setup and monitoring process to ensure new vendors and active vendors are not suspended or debarred. A consistent vendor setup process is followed for each new vendor that Sanford transacts with, regardless of whether the vendor transactions are funded through federal grant funding or through other sources. To prevent a suspended or debarred vendor from being added as a new vendor, the vendor is checked against the suspension and debarment database electronically before completion of the vendor setup. Subsequent to vendor setup, Sanford also monitors the status of its vendors to ensure the vendor’s status has not changed. We selected 25 new vendors to verify that the suspension and debarment screening was performed and performed timely. We noted for 3 of the 25 vendors, the suspension and debarment screening was not performed prior to setting up the vendor in the system and for 1 of these vendors, Sanford had entered into a transaction prior to performing the suspension and debarment screening. We selected 8 procurement transactions that exceeded the small purchase threshold. Of the 8 transactions, 4 transactions did not follow the federal procurement standards and Sanford’s procurement policy which requires sole source documentation be completed prior to procuring the items. Additionally, for 2 of these 4 transactions, Sanford did not have sufficient documentation maintained to support the cost/price analysis performed or justification to support the sole source selection of the vendors. Total federal expenditures subject to suspension and debarment is $2,870,421, and federal expenditures exceeding the micro purchase threshold is $2,298,733. Total federal expenditures under the program, as reported on the SEFA, is $2,870,421. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This finding is a repeat of Finding 2022-001 in the prior year. Recommendation: Management should ensure that the suspension and debarment screening is performed prior to entering into the transaction with the vendor and also ensure that it follows the procurement policy to verify suspension and debarment of the vendor prior to setting up the vendor in the system. In addition, Management should ensure that any sole sourced purchases or when quotes are obtained, that those be documented prior to entering into the procurement transaction. Views of responsible officials: Sanford continues to document periodic validation of the suspension and debarment search results performed by the third-party vendor for vendor searches that yield no suspension and debarment match. Additionally, as part of the periodic validation, Sanford will include a validation to ensure a suspension and debarment search is completed prior to setting the vendor up in the system. Sanford will re-educate appropriate staff regarding the process to verify a suspension and debarment search is completed prior to setting up the vendor in the system. Sanford’s preventative and detective controls and operating procedures provide reasonable assurance over the effectiveness of the controls necessary to prevent the risk of federal funds being paid to vendors that are suspended or debarred. Sanford’s preventive and detective controls and operating procedures provide reasonable assurance over the effectiveness of the controls necessary to prevent the risk of federal funds being utilized for items that do not adhere to the procurement standards. Sanford will re-educate applicable parties and enhance its procedural documentation regarding procurement. Sanford will implement a monthly review process of federal funds utilized for procurement.
Identification of the federal program: Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Pass-Through Entities: North Dakota Department of Health, South Dakota Department of Health and Minnesota Department of Health Assistance Listing: 93.155; COVID-19 Rural Health Research Centers Award Numbers: Various Award Year: FY 2021 – 2023 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” The Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.213 states, “Non-federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR Part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities”. In addition, Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.320 (c) states: “There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold; (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate.” Further, Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.320(a)(2) states: Small purchases – “The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity.” Condition: We noted the following matters during our testing of Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements: • A third-party vendor performed the suspension and debarment validation process for Sanford. The third-party vendor does not have a SOC 1 (System and Organization Controls) Report. For a portion of the year, Sanford relied on the suspension and debarment checks performed by the third-party vendor for results concluding no match without completing a validation control to ensure the results provided by the third-party vendor were accurate. • We noted instances where the vendor screening for suspension and debarment was not performed prior to setting up the vendor in the System and procuring the goods/services. Section III—Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) • For certain procurement transactions tested, we noted Sanford did not adhere to the compliance requirements and did not follow its procurement policy by maintaining documentation related to cost/price analysis or sole-source procurement and completing the sole-source justification forms timely. Cause: Sanford utilizes a third-party vendor to perform suspension and debarment checks on its vendors, both during the vendor setup process as well as ongoing monitoring of active vendors. Sanford did not add an additional validation control until August 2023 to ensure that the suspension and debarment checks performed by the third-party vendor aligned with the governmental suspension and debarment database when the search resulted in no match. In addition, Sanford did not follow its procurement policy and perform the vendor screening for suspension and debarment prior to setting up the vendor in the system and transacting with the vendors. Furthermore, Sanford, prior to entering into the procurement transaction, did not complete the sole-source justification forms, or maintain documentation to support the sole-sourced procurements for those procurement transactions that exceeded the small purchase threshold. Effect or potential effect: Sanford’s screening for suspension and debarment through the third-party vendor results may not be accurate for the period January 1, 2023 through July 31, 2023. Further, by not performing the vendor screening for suspension and debarment prior to transacting with the vendor, Sanford could have potentially entered into a business transaction with suspended or debarred parties. Sanford did not comply with the federal procurement requirements and its procurement policy by not maintaining adequate documentation to support the cost/price analysis or sole sourced vendor selections in addition to not timely completing the sole source justification forms. Section III—Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Questioned costs: $307,249 determined as the amount of the procurement expenditures included in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for two procurement transactions that had inadequate documentation to justify sole source selection. Context: To ensure compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.213, Sanford conducts both preventive and detective controls in its vendor setup and monitoring process to ensure new vendors and active vendors are not suspended or debarred. A consistent vendor setup process is followed for each new vendor that Sanford transacts with, regardless of whether the vendor transactions are funded through federal grant funding or through other sources. To prevent a suspended or debarred vendor from being added as a new vendor, the vendor is checked against the suspension and debarment database electronically before completion of the vendor setup. Subsequent to vendor setup, Sanford also monitors the status of its vendors to ensure the vendor’s status has not changed. We selected 25 new vendors to verify that the suspension and debarment screening was performed and performed timely. We noted for 3 of the 25 vendors, the suspension and debarment screening was not performed prior to setting up the vendor in the system and for 1 of these vendors, Sanford had entered into a transaction prior to performing the suspension and debarment screening. We selected 8 procurement transactions that exceeded the small purchase threshold. Of the 8 transactions, 4 transactions did not follow the federal procurement standards and Sanford’s procurement policy which requires sole source documentation be completed prior to procuring the items. Additionally, for 2 of these 4 transactions, Sanford did not have sufficient documentation maintained to support the cost/price analysis performed or justification to support the sole source selection of the vendors. Total federal expenditures subject to suspension and debarment is $2,870,421, and federal expenditures exceeding the micro purchase threshold is $2,298,733. Total federal expenditures under the program, as reported on the SEFA, is $2,870,421. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This finding is a repeat of Finding 2022-001 in the prior year. Recommendation: Management should ensure that the suspension and debarment screening is performed prior to entering into the transaction with the vendor and also ensure that it follows the procurement policy to verify suspension and debarment of the vendor prior to setting up the vendor in the system. In addition, Management should ensure that any sole sourced purchases or when quotes are obtained, that those be documented prior to entering into the procurement transaction. Views of responsible officials: Sanford continues to document periodic validation of the suspension and debarment search results performed by the third-party vendor for vendor searches that yield no suspension and debarment match. Additionally, as part of the periodic validation, Sanford will include a validation to ensure a suspension and debarment search is completed prior to setting the vendor up in the system. Sanford will re-educate appropriate staff regarding the process to verify a suspension and debarment search is completed prior to setting up the vendor in the system. Sanford’s preventative and detective controls and operating procedures provide reasonable assurance over the effectiveness of the controls necessary to prevent the risk of federal funds being paid to vendors that are suspended or debarred. Sanford’s preventive and detective controls and operating procedures provide reasonable assurance over the effectiveness of the controls necessary to prevent the risk of federal funds being utilized for items that do not adhere to the procurement standards. Sanford will re-educate applicable parties and enhance its procedural documentation regarding procurement. Sanford will implement a monthly review process of federal funds utilized for procurement.
Identification of the federal program: Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Pass-Through Entities: North Dakota Department of Health, South Dakota Department of Health and Minnesota Department of Health Assistance Listing: 93.155; COVID-19 Rural Health Research Centers Award Numbers: Various Award Year: FY 2021 – 2023 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” The Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.213 states, “Non-federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR Part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities”. In addition, Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.320 (c) states: “There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold; (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate.” Further, Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.320(a)(2) states: Small purchases – “The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity.” Condition: We noted the following matters during our testing of Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements: • A third-party vendor performed the suspension and debarment validation process for Sanford. The third-party vendor does not have a SOC 1 (System and Organization Controls) Report. For a portion of the year, Sanford relied on the suspension and debarment checks performed by the third-party vendor for results concluding no match without completing a validation control to ensure the results provided by the third-party vendor were accurate. • We noted instances where the vendor screening for suspension and debarment was not performed prior to setting up the vendor in the System and procuring the goods/services. Section III—Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) • For certain procurement transactions tested, we noted Sanford did not adhere to the compliance requirements and did not follow its procurement policy by maintaining documentation related to cost/price analysis or sole-source procurement and completing the sole-source justification forms timely. Cause: Sanford utilizes a third-party vendor to perform suspension and debarment checks on its vendors, both during the vendor setup process as well as ongoing monitoring of active vendors. Sanford did not add an additional validation control until August 2023 to ensure that the suspension and debarment checks performed by the third-party vendor aligned with the governmental suspension and debarment database when the search resulted in no match. In addition, Sanford did not follow its procurement policy and perform the vendor screening for suspension and debarment prior to setting up the vendor in the system and transacting with the vendors. Furthermore, Sanford, prior to entering into the procurement transaction, did not complete the sole-source justification forms, or maintain documentation to support the sole-sourced procurements for those procurement transactions that exceeded the small purchase threshold. Effect or potential effect: Sanford’s screening for suspension and debarment through the third-party vendor results may not be accurate for the period January 1, 2023 through July 31, 2023. Further, by not performing the vendor screening for suspension and debarment prior to transacting with the vendor, Sanford could have potentially entered into a business transaction with suspended or debarred parties. Sanford did not comply with the federal procurement requirements and its procurement policy by not maintaining adequate documentation to support the cost/price analysis or sole sourced vendor selections in addition to not timely completing the sole source justification forms. Section III—Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Questioned costs: $307,249 determined as the amount of the procurement expenditures included in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for two procurement transactions that had inadequate documentation to justify sole source selection. Context: To ensure compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.213, Sanford conducts both preventive and detective controls in its vendor setup and monitoring process to ensure new vendors and active vendors are not suspended or debarred. A consistent vendor setup process is followed for each new vendor that Sanford transacts with, regardless of whether the vendor transactions are funded through federal grant funding or through other sources. To prevent a suspended or debarred vendor from being added as a new vendor, the vendor is checked against the suspension and debarment database electronically before completion of the vendor setup. Subsequent to vendor setup, Sanford also monitors the status of its vendors to ensure the vendor’s status has not changed. We selected 25 new vendors to verify that the suspension and debarment screening was performed and performed timely. We noted for 3 of the 25 vendors, the suspension and debarment screening was not performed prior to setting up the vendor in the system and for 1 of these vendors, Sanford had entered into a transaction prior to performing the suspension and debarment screening. We selected 8 procurement transactions that exceeded the small purchase threshold. Of the 8 transactions, 4 transactions did not follow the federal procurement standards and Sanford’s procurement policy which requires sole source documentation be completed prior to procuring the items. Additionally, for 2 of these 4 transactions, Sanford did not have sufficient documentation maintained to support the cost/price analysis performed or justification to support the sole source selection of the vendors. Total federal expenditures subject to suspension and debarment is $2,870,421, and federal expenditures exceeding the micro purchase threshold is $2,298,733. Total federal expenditures under the program, as reported on the SEFA, is $2,870,421. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This finding is a repeat of Finding 2022-001 in the prior year. Recommendation: Management should ensure that the suspension and debarment screening is performed prior to entering into the transaction with the vendor and also ensure that it follows the procurement policy to verify suspension and debarment of the vendor prior to setting up the vendor in the system. In addition, Management should ensure that any sole sourced purchases or when quotes are obtained, that those be documented prior to entering into the procurement transaction. Views of responsible officials: Sanford continues to document periodic validation of the suspension and debarment search results performed by the third-party vendor for vendor searches that yield no suspension and debarment match. Additionally, as part of the periodic validation, Sanford will include a validation to ensure a suspension and debarment search is completed prior to setting the vendor up in the system. Sanford will re-educate appropriate staff regarding the process to verify a suspension and debarment search is completed prior to setting up the vendor in the system. Sanford’s preventative and detective controls and operating procedures provide reasonable assurance over the effectiveness of the controls necessary to prevent the risk of federal funds being paid to vendors that are suspended or debarred. Sanford’s preventive and detective controls and operating procedures provide reasonable assurance over the effectiveness of the controls necessary to prevent the risk of federal funds being utilized for items that do not adhere to the procurement standards. Sanford will re-educate applicable parties and enhance its procedural documentation regarding procurement. Sanford will implement a monthly review process of federal funds utilized for procurement.
Identification of the federal program: Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Pass-Through Entities: North Dakota Department of Health, South Dakota Department of Health and Minnesota Department of Health Assistance Listing: 93.155; COVID-19 Rural Health Research Centers Award Numbers: Various Award Year: FY 2021 – 2023 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” The Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.213 states, “Non-federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR Part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities”. In addition, Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.320 (c) states: “There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold; (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate.” Further, Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.320(a)(2) states: Small purchases – “The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity.” Condition: We noted the following matters during our testing of Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements: • A third-party vendor performed the suspension and debarment validation process for Sanford. The third-party vendor does not have a SOC 1 (System and Organization Controls) Report. For a portion of the year, Sanford relied on the suspension and debarment checks performed by the third-party vendor for results concluding no match without completing a validation control to ensure the results provided by the third-party vendor were accurate. • We noted instances where the vendor screening for suspension and debarment was not performed prior to setting up the vendor in the System and procuring the goods/services. Section III—Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) • For certain procurement transactions tested, we noted Sanford did not adhere to the compliance requirements and did not follow its procurement policy by maintaining documentation related to cost/price analysis or sole-source procurement and completing the sole-source justification forms timely. Cause: Sanford utilizes a third-party vendor to perform suspension and debarment checks on its vendors, both during the vendor setup process as well as ongoing monitoring of active vendors. Sanford did not add an additional validation control until August 2023 to ensure that the suspension and debarment checks performed by the third-party vendor aligned with the governmental suspension and debarment database when the search resulted in no match. In addition, Sanford did not follow its procurement policy and perform the vendor screening for suspension and debarment prior to setting up the vendor in the system and transacting with the vendors. Furthermore, Sanford, prior to entering into the procurement transaction, did not complete the sole-source justification forms, or maintain documentation to support the sole-sourced procurements for those procurement transactions that exceeded the small purchase threshold. Effect or potential effect: Sanford’s screening for suspension and debarment through the third-party vendor results may not be accurate for the period January 1, 2023 through July 31, 2023. Further, by not performing the vendor screening for suspension and debarment prior to transacting with the vendor, Sanford could have potentially entered into a business transaction with suspended or debarred parties. Sanford did not comply with the federal procurement requirements and its procurement policy by not maintaining adequate documentation to support the cost/price analysis or sole sourced vendor selections in addition to not timely completing the sole source justification forms. Section III—Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Questioned costs: $307,249 determined as the amount of the procurement expenditures included in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for two procurement transactions that had inadequate documentation to justify sole source selection. Context: To ensure compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.213, Sanford conducts both preventive and detective controls in its vendor setup and monitoring process to ensure new vendors and active vendors are not suspended or debarred. A consistent vendor setup process is followed for each new vendor that Sanford transacts with, regardless of whether the vendor transactions are funded through federal grant funding or through other sources. To prevent a suspended or debarred vendor from being added as a new vendor, the vendor is checked against the suspension and debarment database electronically before completion of the vendor setup. Subsequent to vendor setup, Sanford also monitors the status of its vendors to ensure the vendor’s status has not changed. We selected 25 new vendors to verify that the suspension and debarment screening was performed and performed timely. We noted for 3 of the 25 vendors, the suspension and debarment screening was not performed prior to setting up the vendor in the system and for 1 of these vendors, Sanford had entered into a transaction prior to performing the suspension and debarment screening. We selected 8 procurement transactions that exceeded the small purchase threshold. Of the 8 transactions, 4 transactions did not follow the federal procurement standards and Sanford’s procurement policy which requires sole source documentation be completed prior to procuring the items. Additionally, for 2 of these 4 transactions, Sanford did not have sufficient documentation maintained to support the cost/price analysis performed or justification to support the sole source selection of the vendors. Total federal expenditures subject to suspension and debarment is $2,870,421, and federal expenditures exceeding the micro purchase threshold is $2,298,733. Total federal expenditures under the program, as reported on the SEFA, is $2,870,421. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This finding is a repeat of Finding 2022-001 in the prior year. Recommendation: Management should ensure that the suspension and debarment screening is performed prior to entering into the transaction with the vendor and also ensure that it follows the procurement policy to verify suspension and debarment of the vendor prior to setting up the vendor in the system. In addition, Management should ensure that any sole sourced purchases or when quotes are obtained, that those be documented prior to entering into the procurement transaction. Views of responsible officials: Sanford continues to document periodic validation of the suspension and debarment search results performed by the third-party vendor for vendor searches that yield no suspension and debarment match. Additionally, as part of the periodic validation, Sanford will include a validation to ensure a suspension and debarment search is completed prior to setting the vendor up in the system. Sanford will re-educate appropriate staff regarding the process to verify a suspension and debarment search is completed prior to setting up the vendor in the system. Sanford’s preventative and detective controls and operating procedures provide reasonable assurance over the effectiveness of the controls necessary to prevent the risk of federal funds being paid to vendors that are suspended or debarred. Sanford’s preventive and detective controls and operating procedures provide reasonable assurance over the effectiveness of the controls necessary to prevent the risk of federal funds being utilized for items that do not adhere to the procurement standards. Sanford will re-educate applicable parties and enhance its procedural documentation regarding procurement. Sanford will implement a monthly review process of federal funds utilized for procurement.
Identification of the federal program: Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Pass-Through Entities: North Dakota Department of Health, South Dakota Department of Health and Minnesota Department of Health Assistance Listing: 93.155; COVID-19 Rural Health Research Centers Award Numbers: Various Award Year: FY 2021 – 2023 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” The Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.213 states, “Non-federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR Part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities”. In addition, Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.320 (c) states: “There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold; (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate.” Further, Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.320(a)(2) states: Small purchases – “The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity.” Condition: We noted the following matters during our testing of Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements: • A third-party vendor performed the suspension and debarment validation process for Sanford. The third-party vendor does not have a SOC 1 (System and Organization Controls) Report. For a portion of the year, Sanford relied on the suspension and debarment checks performed by the third-party vendor for results concluding no match without completing a validation control to ensure the results provided by the third-party vendor were accurate. • We noted instances where the vendor screening for suspension and debarment was not performed prior to setting up the vendor in the System and procuring the goods/services. Section III—Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) • For certain procurement transactions tested, we noted Sanford did not adhere to the compliance requirements and did not follow its procurement policy by maintaining documentation related to cost/price analysis or sole-source procurement and completing the sole-source justification forms timely. Cause: Sanford utilizes a third-party vendor to perform suspension and debarment checks on its vendors, both during the vendor setup process as well as ongoing monitoring of active vendors. Sanford did not add an additional validation control until August 2023 to ensure that the suspension and debarment checks performed by the third-party vendor aligned with the governmental suspension and debarment database when the search resulted in no match. In addition, Sanford did not follow its procurement policy and perform the vendor screening for suspension and debarment prior to setting up the vendor in the system and transacting with the vendors. Furthermore, Sanford, prior to entering into the procurement transaction, did not complete the sole-source justification forms, or maintain documentation to support the sole-sourced procurements for those procurement transactions that exceeded the small purchase threshold. Effect or potential effect: Sanford’s screening for suspension and debarment through the third-party vendor results may not be accurate for the period January 1, 2023 through July 31, 2023. Further, by not performing the vendor screening for suspension and debarment prior to transacting with the vendor, Sanford could have potentially entered into a business transaction with suspended or debarred parties. Sanford did not comply with the federal procurement requirements and its procurement policy by not maintaining adequate documentation to support the cost/price analysis or sole sourced vendor selections in addition to not timely completing the sole source justification forms. Section III—Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Questioned costs: $307,249 determined as the amount of the procurement expenditures included in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for two procurement transactions that had inadequate documentation to justify sole source selection. Context: To ensure compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.213, Sanford conducts both preventive and detective controls in its vendor setup and monitoring process to ensure new vendors and active vendors are not suspended or debarred. A consistent vendor setup process is followed for each new vendor that Sanford transacts with, regardless of whether the vendor transactions are funded through federal grant funding or through other sources. To prevent a suspended or debarred vendor from being added as a new vendor, the vendor is checked against the suspension and debarment database electronically before completion of the vendor setup. Subsequent to vendor setup, Sanford also monitors the status of its vendors to ensure the vendor’s status has not changed. We selected 25 new vendors to verify that the suspension and debarment screening was performed and performed timely. We noted for 3 of the 25 vendors, the suspension and debarment screening was not performed prior to setting up the vendor in the system and for 1 of these vendors, Sanford had entered into a transaction prior to performing the suspension and debarment screening. We selected 8 procurement transactions that exceeded the small purchase threshold. Of the 8 transactions, 4 transactions did not follow the federal procurement standards and Sanford’s procurement policy which requires sole source documentation be completed prior to procuring the items. Additionally, for 2 of these 4 transactions, Sanford did not have sufficient documentation maintained to support the cost/price analysis performed or justification to support the sole source selection of the vendors. Total federal expenditures subject to suspension and debarment is $2,870,421, and federal expenditures exceeding the micro purchase threshold is $2,298,733. Total federal expenditures under the program, as reported on the SEFA, is $2,870,421. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This finding is a repeat of Finding 2022-001 in the prior year. Recommendation: Management should ensure that the suspension and debarment screening is performed prior to entering into the transaction with the vendor and also ensure that it follows the procurement policy to verify suspension and debarment of the vendor prior to setting up the vendor in the system. In addition, Management should ensure that any sole sourced purchases or when quotes are obtained, that those be documented prior to entering into the procurement transaction. Views of responsible officials: Sanford continues to document periodic validation of the suspension and debarment search results performed by the third-party vendor for vendor searches that yield no suspension and debarment match. Additionally, as part of the periodic validation, Sanford will include a validation to ensure a suspension and debarment search is completed prior to setting the vendor up in the system. Sanford will re-educate appropriate staff regarding the process to verify a suspension and debarment search is completed prior to setting up the vendor in the system. Sanford’s preventative and detective controls and operating procedures provide reasonable assurance over the effectiveness of the controls necessary to prevent the risk of federal funds being paid to vendors that are suspended or debarred. Sanford’s preventive and detective controls and operating procedures provide reasonable assurance over the effectiveness of the controls necessary to prevent the risk of federal funds being utilized for items that do not adhere to the procurement standards. Sanford will re-educate applicable parties and enhance its procedural documentation regarding procurement. Sanford will implement a monthly review process of federal funds utilized for procurement.
Identification of the federal program: Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Pass-Through Entities: North Dakota Department of Health, South Dakota Department of Health and Minnesota Department of Health Assistance Listing: 93.155; COVID-19 Rural Health Research Centers Award Numbers: Various Award Year: FY 2021 – 2023 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” The Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.213 states, “Non-federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR Part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities”. In addition, Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.320 (c) states: “There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold; (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate.” Further, Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.320(a)(2) states: Small purchases – “The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity.” Condition: We noted the following matters during our testing of Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements: • A third-party vendor performed the suspension and debarment validation process for Sanford. The third-party vendor does not have a SOC 1 (System and Organization Controls) Report. For a portion of the year, Sanford relied on the suspension and debarment checks performed by the third-party vendor for results concluding no match without completing a validation control to ensure the results provided by the third-party vendor were accurate. • We noted instances where the vendor screening for suspension and debarment was not performed prior to setting up the vendor in the System and procuring the goods/services. Section III—Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) • For certain procurement transactions tested, we noted Sanford did not adhere to the compliance requirements and did not follow its procurement policy by maintaining documentation related to cost/price analysis or sole-source procurement and completing the sole-source justification forms timely. Cause: Sanford utilizes a third-party vendor to perform suspension and debarment checks on its vendors, both during the vendor setup process as well as ongoing monitoring of active vendors. Sanford did not add an additional validation control until August 2023 to ensure that the suspension and debarment checks performed by the third-party vendor aligned with the governmental suspension and debarment database when the search resulted in no match. In addition, Sanford did not follow its procurement policy and perform the vendor screening for suspension and debarment prior to setting up the vendor in the system and transacting with the vendors. Furthermore, Sanford, prior to entering into the procurement transaction, did not complete the sole-source justification forms, or maintain documentation to support the sole-sourced procurements for those procurement transactions that exceeded the small purchase threshold. Effect or potential effect: Sanford’s screening for suspension and debarment through the third-party vendor results may not be accurate for the period January 1, 2023 through July 31, 2023. Further, by not performing the vendor screening for suspension and debarment prior to transacting with the vendor, Sanford could have potentially entered into a business transaction with suspended or debarred parties. Sanford did not comply with the federal procurement requirements and its procurement policy by not maintaining adequate documentation to support the cost/price analysis or sole sourced vendor selections in addition to not timely completing the sole source justification forms. Section III—Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Questioned costs: $307,249 determined as the amount of the procurement expenditures included in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for two procurement transactions that had inadequate documentation to justify sole source selection. Context: To ensure compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.213, Sanford conducts both preventive and detective controls in its vendor setup and monitoring process to ensure new vendors and active vendors are not suspended or debarred. A consistent vendor setup process is followed for each new vendor that Sanford transacts with, regardless of whether the vendor transactions are funded through federal grant funding or through other sources. To prevent a suspended or debarred vendor from being added as a new vendor, the vendor is checked against the suspension and debarment database electronically before completion of the vendor setup. Subsequent to vendor setup, Sanford also monitors the status of its vendors to ensure the vendor’s status has not changed. We selected 25 new vendors to verify that the suspension and debarment screening was performed and performed timely. We noted for 3 of the 25 vendors, the suspension and debarment screening was not performed prior to setting up the vendor in the system and for 1 of these vendors, Sanford had entered into a transaction prior to performing the suspension and debarment screening. We selected 8 procurement transactions that exceeded the small purchase threshold. Of the 8 transactions, 4 transactions did not follow the federal procurement standards and Sanford’s procurement policy which requires sole source documentation be completed prior to procuring the items. Additionally, for 2 of these 4 transactions, Sanford did not have sufficient documentation maintained to support the cost/price analysis performed or justification to support the sole source selection of the vendors. Total federal expenditures subject to suspension and debarment is $2,870,421, and federal expenditures exceeding the micro purchase threshold is $2,298,733. Total federal expenditures under the program, as reported on the SEFA, is $2,870,421. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This finding is a repeat of Finding 2022-001 in the prior year. Recommendation: Management should ensure that the suspension and debarment screening is performed prior to entering into the transaction with the vendor and also ensure that it follows the procurement policy to verify suspension and debarment of the vendor prior to setting up the vendor in the system. In addition, Management should ensure that any sole sourced purchases or when quotes are obtained, that those be documented prior to entering into the procurement transaction. Views of responsible officials: Sanford continues to document periodic validation of the suspension and debarment search results performed by the third-party vendor for vendor searches that yield no suspension and debarment match. Additionally, as part of the periodic validation, Sanford will include a validation to ensure a suspension and debarment search is completed prior to setting the vendor up in the system. Sanford will re-educate appropriate staff regarding the process to verify a suspension and debarment search is completed prior to setting up the vendor in the system. Sanford’s preventative and detective controls and operating procedures provide reasonable assurance over the effectiveness of the controls necessary to prevent the risk of federal funds being paid to vendors that are suspended or debarred. Sanford’s preventive and detective controls and operating procedures provide reasonable assurance over the effectiveness of the controls necessary to prevent the risk of federal funds being utilized for items that do not adhere to the procurement standards. Sanford will re-educate applicable parties and enhance its procedural documentation regarding procurement. Sanford will implement a monthly review process of federal funds utilized for procurement.
Identification of the federal program: Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Pass-Through Entities: North Dakota Department of Health, South Dakota Department of Health and Minnesota Department of Health Assistance Listing: 93.155; COVID-19 Rural Health Research Centers Award Numbers: Various Award Year: FY 2021 – 2023 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” The Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.213 states, “Non-federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR Part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities”. In addition, Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.320 (c) states: “There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold; (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate.” Further, Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.320(a)(2) states: Small purchases – “The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity.” Condition: We noted the following matters during our testing of Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements: • A third-party vendor performed the suspension and debarment validation process for Sanford. The third-party vendor does not have a SOC 1 (System and Organization Controls) Report. For a portion of the year, Sanford relied on the suspension and debarment checks performed by the third-party vendor for results concluding no match without completing a validation control to ensure the results provided by the third-party vendor were accurate. • We noted instances where the vendor screening for suspension and debarment was not performed prior to setting up the vendor in the System and procuring the goods/services. Section III—Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) • For certain procurement transactions tested, we noted Sanford did not adhere to the compliance requirements and did not follow its procurement policy by maintaining documentation related to cost/price analysis or sole-source procurement and completing the sole-source justification forms timely. Cause: Sanford utilizes a third-party vendor to perform suspension and debarment checks on its vendors, both during the vendor setup process as well as ongoing monitoring of active vendors. Sanford did not add an additional validation control until August 2023 to ensure that the suspension and debarment checks performed by the third-party vendor aligned with the governmental suspension and debarment database when the search resulted in no match. In addition, Sanford did not follow its procurement policy and perform the vendor screening for suspension and debarment prior to setting up the vendor in the system and transacting with the vendors. Furthermore, Sanford, prior to entering into the procurement transaction, did not complete the sole-source justification forms, or maintain documentation to support the sole-sourced procurements for those procurement transactions that exceeded the small purchase threshold. Effect or potential effect: Sanford’s screening for suspension and debarment through the third-party vendor results may not be accurate for the period January 1, 2023 through July 31, 2023. Further, by not performing the vendor screening for suspension and debarment prior to transacting with the vendor, Sanford could have potentially entered into a business transaction with suspended or debarred parties. Sanford did not comply with the federal procurement requirements and its procurement policy by not maintaining adequate documentation to support the cost/price analysis or sole sourced vendor selections in addition to not timely completing the sole source justification forms. Section III—Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Questioned costs: $307,249 determined as the amount of the procurement expenditures included in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for two procurement transactions that had inadequate documentation to justify sole source selection. Context: To ensure compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.213, Sanford conducts both preventive and detective controls in its vendor setup and monitoring process to ensure new vendors and active vendors are not suspended or debarred. A consistent vendor setup process is followed for each new vendor that Sanford transacts with, regardless of whether the vendor transactions are funded through federal grant funding or through other sources. To prevent a suspended or debarred vendor from being added as a new vendor, the vendor is checked against the suspension and debarment database electronically before completion of the vendor setup. Subsequent to vendor setup, Sanford also monitors the status of its vendors to ensure the vendor’s status has not changed. We selected 25 new vendors to verify that the suspension and debarment screening was performed and performed timely. We noted for 3 of the 25 vendors, the suspension and debarment screening was not performed prior to setting up the vendor in the system and for 1 of these vendors, Sanford had entered into a transaction prior to performing the suspension and debarment screening. We selected 8 procurement transactions that exceeded the small purchase threshold. Of the 8 transactions, 4 transactions did not follow the federal procurement standards and Sanford’s procurement policy which requires sole source documentation be completed prior to procuring the items. Additionally, for 2 of these 4 transactions, Sanford did not have sufficient documentation maintained to support the cost/price analysis performed or justification to support the sole source selection of the vendors. Total federal expenditures subject to suspension and debarment is $2,870,421, and federal expenditures exceeding the micro purchase threshold is $2,298,733. Total federal expenditures under the program, as reported on the SEFA, is $2,870,421. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This finding is a repeat of Finding 2022-001 in the prior year. Recommendation: Management should ensure that the suspension and debarment screening is performed prior to entering into the transaction with the vendor and also ensure that it follows the procurement policy to verify suspension and debarment of the vendor prior to setting up the vendor in the system. In addition, Management should ensure that any sole sourced purchases or when quotes are obtained, that those be documented prior to entering into the procurement transaction. Views of responsible officials: Sanford continues to document periodic validation of the suspension and debarment search results performed by the third-party vendor for vendor searches that yield no suspension and debarment match. Additionally, as part of the periodic validation, Sanford will include a validation to ensure a suspension and debarment search is completed prior to setting the vendor up in the system. Sanford will re-educate appropriate staff regarding the process to verify a suspension and debarment search is completed prior to setting up the vendor in the system. Sanford’s preventative and detective controls and operating procedures provide reasonable assurance over the effectiveness of the controls necessary to prevent the risk of federal funds being paid to vendors that are suspended or debarred. Sanford’s preventive and detective controls and operating procedures provide reasonable assurance over the effectiveness of the controls necessary to prevent the risk of federal funds being utilized for items that do not adhere to the procurement standards. Sanford will re-educate applicable parties and enhance its procedural documentation regarding procurement. Sanford will implement a monthly review process of federal funds utilized for procurement.
Identification of the federal program: Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Pass-Through Entities: North Dakota Department of Health, South Dakota Department of Health and Minnesota Department of Health Assistance Listing: 93.155; COVID-19 Rural Health Research Centers Award Numbers: Various Award Year: FY 2021 – 2023 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” The Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.213 states, “Non-federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR Part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities”. In addition, Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.320 (c) states: “There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold; (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate.” Further, Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.320(a)(2) states: Small purchases – “The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity.” Condition: We noted the following matters during our testing of Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements: • A third-party vendor performed the suspension and debarment validation process for Sanford. The third-party vendor does not have a SOC 1 (System and Organization Controls) Report. For a portion of the year, Sanford relied on the suspension and debarment checks performed by the third-party vendor for results concluding no match without completing a validation control to ensure the results provided by the third-party vendor were accurate. • We noted instances where the vendor screening for suspension and debarment was not performed prior to setting up the vendor in the System and procuring the goods/services. Section III—Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) • For certain procurement transactions tested, we noted Sanford did not adhere to the compliance requirements and did not follow its procurement policy by maintaining documentation related to cost/price analysis or sole-source procurement and completing the sole-source justification forms timely. Cause: Sanford utilizes a third-party vendor to perform suspension and debarment checks on its vendors, both during the vendor setup process as well as ongoing monitoring of active vendors. Sanford did not add an additional validation control until August 2023 to ensure that the suspension and debarment checks performed by the third-party vendor aligned with the governmental suspension and debarment database when the search resulted in no match. In addition, Sanford did not follow its procurement policy and perform the vendor screening for suspension and debarment prior to setting up the vendor in the system and transacting with the vendors. Furthermore, Sanford, prior to entering into the procurement transaction, did not complete the sole-source justification forms, or maintain documentation to support the sole-sourced procurements for those procurement transactions that exceeded the small purchase threshold. Effect or potential effect: Sanford’s screening for suspension and debarment through the third-party vendor results may not be accurate for the period January 1, 2023 through July 31, 2023. Further, by not performing the vendor screening for suspension and debarment prior to transacting with the vendor, Sanford could have potentially entered into a business transaction with suspended or debarred parties. Sanford did not comply with the federal procurement requirements and its procurement policy by not maintaining adequate documentation to support the cost/price analysis or sole sourced vendor selections in addition to not timely completing the sole source justification forms. Section III—Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Questioned costs: $307,249 determined as the amount of the procurement expenditures included in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for two procurement transactions that had inadequate documentation to justify sole source selection. Context: To ensure compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.213, Sanford conducts both preventive and detective controls in its vendor setup and monitoring process to ensure new vendors and active vendors are not suspended or debarred. A consistent vendor setup process is followed for each new vendor that Sanford transacts with, regardless of whether the vendor transactions are funded through federal grant funding or through other sources. To prevent a suspended or debarred vendor from being added as a new vendor, the vendor is checked against the suspension and debarment database electronically before completion of the vendor setup. Subsequent to vendor setup, Sanford also monitors the status of its vendors to ensure the vendor’s status has not changed. We selected 25 new vendors to verify that the suspension and debarment screening was performed and performed timely. We noted for 3 of the 25 vendors, the suspension and debarment screening was not performed prior to setting up the vendor in the system and for 1 of these vendors, Sanford had entered into a transaction prior to performing the suspension and debarment screening. We selected 8 procurement transactions that exceeded the small purchase threshold. Of the 8 transactions, 4 transactions did not follow the federal procurement standards and Sanford’s procurement policy which requires sole source documentation be completed prior to procuring the items. Additionally, for 2 of these 4 transactions, Sanford did not have sufficient documentation maintained to support the cost/price analysis performed or justification to support the sole source selection of the vendors. Total federal expenditures subject to suspension and debarment is $2,870,421, and federal expenditures exceeding the micro purchase threshold is $2,298,733. Total federal expenditures under the program, as reported on the SEFA, is $2,870,421. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This finding is a repeat of Finding 2022-001 in the prior year. Recommendation: Management should ensure that the suspension and debarment screening is performed prior to entering into the transaction with the vendor and also ensure that it follows the procurement policy to verify suspension and debarment of the vendor prior to setting up the vendor in the system. In addition, Management should ensure that any sole sourced purchases or when quotes are obtained, that those be documented prior to entering into the procurement transaction. Views of responsible officials: Sanford continues to document periodic validation of the suspension and debarment search results performed by the third-party vendor for vendor searches that yield no suspension and debarment match. Additionally, as part of the periodic validation, Sanford will include a validation to ensure a suspension and debarment search is completed prior to setting the vendor up in the system. Sanford will re-educate appropriate staff regarding the process to verify a suspension and debarment search is completed prior to setting up the vendor in the system. Sanford’s preventative and detective controls and operating procedures provide reasonable assurance over the effectiveness of the controls necessary to prevent the risk of federal funds being paid to vendors that are suspended or debarred. Sanford’s preventive and detective controls and operating procedures provide reasonable assurance over the effectiveness of the controls necessary to prevent the risk of federal funds being utilized for items that do not adhere to the procurement standards. Sanford will re-educate applicable parties and enhance its procedural documentation regarding procurement. Sanford will implement a monthly review process of federal funds utilized for procurement.
Identification of the federal program: Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Pass-Through Entities: North Dakota Department of Health, South Dakota Department of Health and Minnesota Department of Health Assistance Listing: 93.155; COVID-19 Rural Health Research Centers Award Numbers: Various Award Year: FY 2021 – 2023 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” The Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.213 states, “Non-federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR Part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities”. In addition, Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.320 (c) states: “There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold; (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate.” Further, Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.320(a)(2) states: Small purchases – “The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity.” Condition: We noted the following matters during our testing of Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements: • A third-party vendor performed the suspension and debarment validation process for Sanford. The third-party vendor does not have a SOC 1 (System and Organization Controls) Report. For a portion of the year, Sanford relied on the suspension and debarment checks performed by the third-party vendor for results concluding no match without completing a validation control to ensure the results provided by the third-party vendor were accurate. • We noted instances where the vendor screening for suspension and debarment was not performed prior to setting up the vendor in the System and procuring the goods/services. Section III—Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) • For certain procurement transactions tested, we noted Sanford did not adhere to the compliance requirements and did not follow its procurement policy by maintaining documentation related to cost/price analysis or sole-source procurement and completing the sole-source justification forms timely. Cause: Sanford utilizes a third-party vendor to perform suspension and debarment checks on its vendors, both during the vendor setup process as well as ongoing monitoring of active vendors. Sanford did not add an additional validation control until August 2023 to ensure that the suspension and debarment checks performed by the third-party vendor aligned with the governmental suspension and debarment database when the search resulted in no match. In addition, Sanford did not follow its procurement policy and perform the vendor screening for suspension and debarment prior to setting up the vendor in the system and transacting with the vendors. Furthermore, Sanford, prior to entering into the procurement transaction, did not complete the sole-source justification forms, or maintain documentation to support the sole-sourced procurements for those procurement transactions that exceeded the small purchase threshold. Effect or potential effect: Sanford’s screening for suspension and debarment through the third-party vendor results may not be accurate for the period January 1, 2023 through July 31, 2023. Further, by not performing the vendor screening for suspension and debarment prior to transacting with the vendor, Sanford could have potentially entered into a business transaction with suspended or debarred parties. Sanford did not comply with the federal procurement requirements and its procurement policy by not maintaining adequate documentation to support the cost/price analysis or sole sourced vendor selections in addition to not timely completing the sole source justification forms. Section III—Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Questioned costs: $307,249 determined as the amount of the procurement expenditures included in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for two procurement transactions that had inadequate documentation to justify sole source selection. Context: To ensure compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.213, Sanford conducts both preventive and detective controls in its vendor setup and monitoring process to ensure new vendors and active vendors are not suspended or debarred. A consistent vendor setup process is followed for each new vendor that Sanford transacts with, regardless of whether the vendor transactions are funded through federal grant funding or through other sources. To prevent a suspended or debarred vendor from being added as a new vendor, the vendor is checked against the suspension and debarment database electronically before completion of the vendor setup. Subsequent to vendor setup, Sanford also monitors the status of its vendors to ensure the vendor’s status has not changed. We selected 25 new vendors to verify that the suspension and debarment screening was performed and performed timely. We noted for 3 of the 25 vendors, the suspension and debarment screening was not performed prior to setting up the vendor in the system and for 1 of these vendors, Sanford had entered into a transaction prior to performing the suspension and debarment screening. We selected 8 procurement transactions that exceeded the small purchase threshold. Of the 8 transactions, 4 transactions did not follow the federal procurement standards and Sanford’s procurement policy which requires sole source documentation be completed prior to procuring the items. Additionally, for 2 of these 4 transactions, Sanford did not have sufficient documentation maintained to support the cost/price analysis performed or justification to support the sole source selection of the vendors. Total federal expenditures subject to suspension and debarment is $2,870,421, and federal expenditures exceeding the micro purchase threshold is $2,298,733. Total federal expenditures under the program, as reported on the SEFA, is $2,870,421. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This finding is a repeat of Finding 2022-001 in the prior year. Recommendation: Management should ensure that the suspension and debarment screening is performed prior to entering into the transaction with the vendor and also ensure that it follows the procurement policy to verify suspension and debarment of the vendor prior to setting up the vendor in the system. In addition, Management should ensure that any sole sourced purchases or when quotes are obtained, that those be documented prior to entering into the procurement transaction. Views of responsible officials: Sanford continues to document periodic validation of the suspension and debarment search results performed by the third-party vendor for vendor searches that yield no suspension and debarment match. Additionally, as part of the periodic validation, Sanford will include a validation to ensure a suspension and debarment search is completed prior to setting the vendor up in the system. Sanford will re-educate appropriate staff regarding the process to verify a suspension and debarment search is completed prior to setting up the vendor in the system. Sanford’s preventative and detective controls and operating procedures provide reasonable assurance over the effectiveness of the controls necessary to prevent the risk of federal funds being paid to vendors that are suspended or debarred. Sanford’s preventive and detective controls and operating procedures provide reasonable assurance over the effectiveness of the controls necessary to prevent the risk of federal funds being utilized for items that do not adhere to the procurement standards. Sanford will re-educate applicable parties and enhance its procedural documentation regarding procurement. Sanford will implement a monthly review process of federal funds utilized for procurement.
Identification of the federal program: Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Pass-Through Entities: North Dakota Department of Health, South Dakota Department of Health and Minnesota Department of Health Assistance Listing: 93.155; COVID-19 Rural Health Research Centers Award Numbers: Various Award Year: FY 2021 – 2023 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” The Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.213 states, “Non-federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR Part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities”. In addition, Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.320 (c) states: “There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold; (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate.” Further, Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.320(a)(2) states: Small purchases – “The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity.” Condition: We noted the following matters during our testing of Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements: • A third-party vendor performed the suspension and debarment validation process for Sanford. The third-party vendor does not have a SOC 1 (System and Organization Controls) Report. For a portion of the year, Sanford relied on the suspension and debarment checks performed by the third-party vendor for results concluding no match without completing a validation control to ensure the results provided by the third-party vendor were accurate. • We noted instances where the vendor screening for suspension and debarment was not performed prior to setting up the vendor in the System and procuring the goods/services. Section III—Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) • For certain procurement transactions tested, we noted Sanford did not adhere to the compliance requirements and did not follow its procurement policy by maintaining documentation related to cost/price analysis or sole-source procurement and completing the sole-source justification forms timely. Cause: Sanford utilizes a third-party vendor to perform suspension and debarment checks on its vendors, both during the vendor setup process as well as ongoing monitoring of active vendors. Sanford did not add an additional validation control until August 2023 to ensure that the suspension and debarment checks performed by the third-party vendor aligned with the governmental suspension and debarment database when the search resulted in no match. In addition, Sanford did not follow its procurement policy and perform the vendor screening for suspension and debarment prior to setting up the vendor in the system and transacting with the vendors. Furthermore, Sanford, prior to entering into the procurement transaction, did not complete the sole-source justification forms, or maintain documentation to support the sole-sourced procurements for those procurement transactions that exceeded the small purchase threshold. Effect or potential effect: Sanford’s screening for suspension and debarment through the third-party vendor results may not be accurate for the period January 1, 2023 through July 31, 2023. Further, by not performing the vendor screening for suspension and debarment prior to transacting with the vendor, Sanford could have potentially entered into a business transaction with suspended or debarred parties. Sanford did not comply with the federal procurement requirements and its procurement policy by not maintaining adequate documentation to support the cost/price analysis or sole sourced vendor selections in addition to not timely completing the sole source justification forms. Section III—Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Questioned costs: $307,249 determined as the amount of the procurement expenditures included in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for two procurement transactions that had inadequate documentation to justify sole source selection. Context: To ensure compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.213, Sanford conducts both preventive and detective controls in its vendor setup and monitoring process to ensure new vendors and active vendors are not suspended or debarred. A consistent vendor setup process is followed for each new vendor that Sanford transacts with, regardless of whether the vendor transactions are funded through federal grant funding or through other sources. To prevent a suspended or debarred vendor from being added as a new vendor, the vendor is checked against the suspension and debarment database electronically before completion of the vendor setup. Subsequent to vendor setup, Sanford also monitors the status of its vendors to ensure the vendor’s status has not changed. We selected 25 new vendors to verify that the suspension and debarment screening was performed and performed timely. We noted for 3 of the 25 vendors, the suspension and debarment screening was not performed prior to setting up the vendor in the system and for 1 of these vendors, Sanford had entered into a transaction prior to performing the suspension and debarment screening. We selected 8 procurement transactions that exceeded the small purchase threshold. Of the 8 transactions, 4 transactions did not follow the federal procurement standards and Sanford’s procurement policy which requires sole source documentation be completed prior to procuring the items. Additionally, for 2 of these 4 transactions, Sanford did not have sufficient documentation maintained to support the cost/price analysis performed or justification to support the sole source selection of the vendors. Total federal expenditures subject to suspension and debarment is $2,870,421, and federal expenditures exceeding the micro purchase threshold is $2,298,733. Total federal expenditures under the program, as reported on the SEFA, is $2,870,421. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This finding is a repeat of Finding 2022-001 in the prior year. Recommendation: Management should ensure that the suspension and debarment screening is performed prior to entering into the transaction with the vendor and also ensure that it follows the procurement policy to verify suspension and debarment of the vendor prior to setting up the vendor in the system. In addition, Management should ensure that any sole sourced purchases or when quotes are obtained, that those be documented prior to entering into the procurement transaction. Views of responsible officials: Sanford continues to document periodic validation of the suspension and debarment search results performed by the third-party vendor for vendor searches that yield no suspension and debarment match. Additionally, as part of the periodic validation, Sanford will include a validation to ensure a suspension and debarment search is completed prior to setting the vendor up in the system. Sanford will re-educate appropriate staff regarding the process to verify a suspension and debarment search is completed prior to setting up the vendor in the system. Sanford’s preventative and detective controls and operating procedures provide reasonable assurance over the effectiveness of the controls necessary to prevent the risk of federal funds being paid to vendors that are suspended or debarred. Sanford’s preventive and detective controls and operating procedures provide reasonable assurance over the effectiveness of the controls necessary to prevent the risk of federal funds being utilized for items that do not adhere to the procurement standards. Sanford will re-educate applicable parties and enhance its procedural documentation regarding procurement. Sanford will implement a monthly review process of federal funds utilized for procurement.
Identification of the federal program: Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Pass-Through Entities: North Dakota Department of Health, South Dakota Department of Health and Minnesota Department of Health Assistance Listing: 93.155; COVID-19 Rural Health Research Centers Award Numbers: Various Award Year: FY 2021 – 2023 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” The Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.213 states, “Non-federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR Part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities”. In addition, Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.320 (c) states: “There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold; (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate.” Further, Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.320(a)(2) states: Small purchases – “The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity.” Condition: We noted the following matters during our testing of Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements: • A third-party vendor performed the suspension and debarment validation process for Sanford. The third-party vendor does not have a SOC 1 (System and Organization Controls) Report. For a portion of the year, Sanford relied on the suspension and debarment checks performed by the third-party vendor for results concluding no match without completing a validation control to ensure the results provided by the third-party vendor were accurate. • We noted instances where the vendor screening for suspension and debarment was not performed prior to setting up the vendor in the System and procuring the goods/services. Section III—Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) • For certain procurement transactions tested, we noted Sanford did not adhere to the compliance requirements and did not follow its procurement policy by maintaining documentation related to cost/price analysis or sole-source procurement and completing the sole-source justification forms timely. Cause: Sanford utilizes a third-party vendor to perform suspension and debarment checks on its vendors, both during the vendor setup process as well as ongoing monitoring of active vendors. Sanford did not add an additional validation control until August 2023 to ensure that the suspension and debarment checks performed by the third-party vendor aligned with the governmental suspension and debarment database when the search resulted in no match. In addition, Sanford did not follow its procurement policy and perform the vendor screening for suspension and debarment prior to setting up the vendor in the system and transacting with the vendors. Furthermore, Sanford, prior to entering into the procurement transaction, did not complete the sole-source justification forms, or maintain documentation to support the sole-sourced procurements for those procurement transactions that exceeded the small purchase threshold. Effect or potential effect: Sanford’s screening for suspension and debarment through the third-party vendor results may not be accurate for the period January 1, 2023 through July 31, 2023. Further, by not performing the vendor screening for suspension and debarment prior to transacting with the vendor, Sanford could have potentially entered into a business transaction with suspended or debarred parties. Sanford did not comply with the federal procurement requirements and its procurement policy by not maintaining adequate documentation to support the cost/price analysis or sole sourced vendor selections in addition to not timely completing the sole source justification forms. Section III—Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Questioned costs: $307,249 determined as the amount of the procurement expenditures included in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for two procurement transactions that had inadequate documentation to justify sole source selection. Context: To ensure compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.213, Sanford conducts both preventive and detective controls in its vendor setup and monitoring process to ensure new vendors and active vendors are not suspended or debarred. A consistent vendor setup process is followed for each new vendor that Sanford transacts with, regardless of whether the vendor transactions are funded through federal grant funding or through other sources. To prevent a suspended or debarred vendor from being added as a new vendor, the vendor is checked against the suspension and debarment database electronically before completion of the vendor setup. Subsequent to vendor setup, Sanford also monitors the status of its vendors to ensure the vendor’s status has not changed. We selected 25 new vendors to verify that the suspension and debarment screening was performed and performed timely. We noted for 3 of the 25 vendors, the suspension and debarment screening was not performed prior to setting up the vendor in the system and for 1 of these vendors, Sanford had entered into a transaction prior to performing the suspension and debarment screening. We selected 8 procurement transactions that exceeded the small purchase threshold. Of the 8 transactions, 4 transactions did not follow the federal procurement standards and Sanford’s procurement policy which requires sole source documentation be completed prior to procuring the items. Additionally, for 2 of these 4 transactions, Sanford did not have sufficient documentation maintained to support the cost/price analysis performed or justification to support the sole source selection of the vendors. Total federal expenditures subject to suspension and debarment is $2,870,421, and federal expenditures exceeding the micro purchase threshold is $2,298,733. Total federal expenditures under the program, as reported on the SEFA, is $2,870,421. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This finding is a repeat of Finding 2022-001 in the prior year. Recommendation: Management should ensure that the suspension and debarment screening is performed prior to entering into the transaction with the vendor and also ensure that it follows the procurement policy to verify suspension and debarment of the vendor prior to setting up the vendor in the system. In addition, Management should ensure that any sole sourced purchases or when quotes are obtained, that those be documented prior to entering into the procurement transaction. Views of responsible officials: Sanford continues to document periodic validation of the suspension and debarment search results performed by the third-party vendor for vendor searches that yield no suspension and debarment match. Additionally, as part of the periodic validation, Sanford will include a validation to ensure a suspension and debarment search is completed prior to setting the vendor up in the system. Sanford will re-educate appropriate staff regarding the process to verify a suspension and debarment search is completed prior to setting up the vendor in the system. Sanford’s preventative and detective controls and operating procedures provide reasonable assurance over the effectiveness of the controls necessary to prevent the risk of federal funds being paid to vendors that are suspended or debarred. Sanford’s preventive and detective controls and operating procedures provide reasonable assurance over the effectiveness of the controls necessary to prevent the risk of federal funds being utilized for items that do not adhere to the procurement standards. Sanford will re-educate applicable parties and enhance its procedural documentation regarding procurement. Sanford will implement a monthly review process of federal funds utilized for procurement.
2023-002 - Internal Control over Compliance and Compliance with Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Information on the Major Federal Program(s) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Center for Disease Control and Prevention Assistance Listing Number: 93.261 Assistance Listing Name: Scaling the National Diabetes Prevention Program Preventing Type 2 Diabetes Among People at High Risk Grant Award Number(s): 6 NU58DP006364-05-05 Award Period: September 30, 2021 to September 30, 2023 Criteria or Specific Requirement – In accordance with 2 CFR §200.318(a), General Procurement Standards, the non-federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal law and the standards identified in General Procurement Standards. Additionally, §200.318(i) states that the non-federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of the procurement. These records are required to include but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In accordance with §200.213 and §180.300, Suspension and Debarment, non-federal entities cannot enter into awards, subawards, or contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities. Non-federal entities must either check for exclusions in the System for Award Management (SAM); collect a certification from the entity, or add a clause or condition to the covered transaction with the entity prior to entering into a covered transaction with a non-federal entity. In addition, in accordance with §180.415(b), non-federal entities cannot renew or extend covered transactions (other than no-cost time extension) with any excluded person, or under which an excluded person is a principal, unless the non-federal entity obtains an exception under §180.135. Condition - During our testing of the procurement, suspension and debarment compliance requirements, we identified one procurement sample (out of a total of 1 procurement) that did not have documentation in the vendor/ procurement file to document that the debarment attestation from the vendor was provided and obtained prior to entering into contract with the vendor. The attestation statements directly from the vendor concluded that the vendor was not suspended or debarred. This is considered a finding as ADA did not follow its policy to maintain documentation in the vendor files (with a time stamp). Cause - ADA did not adhere to its documented policies and procedures for ensuring proper suspension and debarment validations were performed before entering into a contract. Effect or Potential Effect - Failure to timely verify that a vendor is not suspended or debarred could result in transactions involving unreasonable costs or result in unintentionally entering a contract with an entity that is barred from performing work for the Federal government. Questioned Costs - None. Context - This is a condition based on testing of ADA’s compliance with specified requirements. The sample was selected using a non-statistical method. Repeat Finding - This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation - We recommend management ensure that suspension and debarment regulations are followed. We also recommend management ensure all required procurement documentation is maintained in conjunction with its documented policy. Views of Responsible Officials - The finding related to a vendor that was in place and performing work in advance of inclusion as a covered transaction. Going forward, ADA will ensure that suspension and debarment regulations are followed. ADA will also ensure that all required procurement documentation is maintained in conjunction with its documented policy.
Finding # 2023-002 Procurement, Suspension and Debarment (Significant Deficiency) Information on the Federal Programs: Assistance Listing #98.001 USAID Foreign Assistance for Programs Overseas Criteria or Specific Requirement: § 200.318 (i) General procurement standards, states that the non-federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Furthermore: §200.320 (f) Methods of procurement to be followed, states that procurement by noncompetitive proposals is procurement through solicitation of a proposal from only one source and may be used only when certain requirements have been met. Additionally, §200.213 Reporting a determination that a non-Federal entity is not qualified for a Federal award states that non-federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities. The nonfederal entity must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified, by (a) checking SAM Exclusions; (b) collecting a certification from that person; (c) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Condition: During our audit, we noted contractual relationships under the federal awards for which evidence of procurement procedures and documentation of SAM Exclusion checks were unavailable for our inspection. It is our understanding that some contracts were procured under noncompetitive (sole source) justification. However, in certain instances we were unable to review documentation (prepared at the time the contracts were executed) detailing the history and rationale of the procurements. Cause: The Institute's processes in place during 2023 did not provide for the formalization and retention of procurement records and vendor screenings consistent with the expectations outlined in 2 CFR 200 and related guidance provided by USAID. Effect or Potential Effect: Purchases of goods and services could be made above the prevailing market rates if the prescribed procurement procedures are not adhered to. Additionally, the Institute may have inadvertently selected noncompetitive proposals method when the circumstances did not meet the requirements noted in § 200.320 (f) Methods of procurement to be followed, and thereby failing to administer full and open competition as required by the regulations. Finally, the Institute could inadvertently enter into a contractual relationship with an entity that is suspended, debarred or otherwise included on the US Federal sanction list. Questioned Costs: N/A Context: Our audit sample consisted of transactions incurred by both JGI USA and JGI Tanzania. The finding relates to a transaction incurred by both entities. Both entities have defined procurement policies. Identification as a Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: We recommend that the Institute ensure its policy is distributed and communicated in a formal manner to its employees, and that management properly enforce compliance with its policy. All procurement actions should be clearly documented in writing and maintained in the vendor or contractor files. Such documentation should include, but is not limited to; (1) Bids (2) Bid Analysis with documentation of vendor selection and rationale (3) Minutes of meetings of procurement committee (4) for sole source procurements, documentation of which of the allowable sole source criteria the procurement was done under. Additionally, we recommend that the procurement policies are enhanced to include compliance with §200.320 (f) Methods of procurement to be followed and, §200.213 Reporting a determination that a non-Federal entity is not qualified for a Federal award.
Finding # 2023-002 Procurement, Suspension and Debarment (Significant Deficiency) Information on the Federal Programs: Assistance Listing #98.001 USAID Foreign Assistance for Programs Overseas Criteria or Specific Requirement: § 200.318 (i) General procurement standards, states that the non-federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Furthermore: §200.320 (f) Methods of procurement to be followed, states that procurement by noncompetitive proposals is procurement through solicitation of a proposal from only one source and may be used only when certain requirements have been met. Additionally, §200.213 Reporting a determination that a non-Federal entity is not qualified for a Federal award states that non-federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities. The nonfederal entity must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified, by (a) checking SAM Exclusions; (b) collecting a certification from that person; (c) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Condition: During our audit, we noted contractual relationships under the federal awards for which evidence of procurement procedures and documentation of SAM Exclusion checks were unavailable for our inspection. It is our understanding that some contracts were procured under noncompetitive (sole source) justification. However, in certain instances we were unable to review documentation (prepared at the time the contracts were executed) detailing the history and rationale of the procurements. Cause: The Institute's processes in place during 2023 did not provide for the formalization and retention of procurement records and vendor screenings consistent with the expectations outlined in 2 CFR 200 and related guidance provided by USAID. Effect or Potential Effect: Purchases of goods and services could be made above the prevailing market rates if the prescribed procurement procedures are not adhered to. Additionally, the Institute may have inadvertently selected noncompetitive proposals method when the circumstances did not meet the requirements noted in § 200.320 (f) Methods of procurement to be followed, and thereby failing to administer full and open competition as required by the regulations. Finally, the Institute could inadvertently enter into a contractual relationship with an entity that is suspended, debarred or otherwise included on the US Federal sanction list. Questioned Costs: N/A Context: Our audit sample consisted of transactions incurred by both JGI USA and JGI Tanzania. The finding relates to a transaction incurred by both entities. Both entities have defined procurement policies. Identification as a Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: We recommend that the Institute ensure its policy is distributed and communicated in a formal manner to its employees, and that management properly enforce compliance with its policy. All procurement actions should be clearly documented in writing and maintained in the vendor or contractor files. Such documentation should include, but is not limited to; (1) Bids (2) Bid Analysis with documentation of vendor selection and rationale (3) Minutes of meetings of procurement committee (4) for sole source procurements, documentation of which of the allowable sole source criteria the procurement was done under. Additionally, we recommend that the procurement policies are enhanced to include compliance with §200.320 (f) Methods of procurement to be followed and, §200.213 Reporting a determination that a non-Federal entity is not qualified for a Federal award.
Finding 2023-002: Suspension and Debarment and U.S. Government Regulations on Terrorism Information on the Federal Programs: All Programs Criteria or Specific Requirement: CFR 200.213 "Reporting a determination that a non-Federal entity is not qualified for a Federal award" states that non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The non-Federal entity must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified, by (a) checking SAM Exclusions; (b) collecting a certification from that person; (c) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Condition: During our testing over Suspension and Debarment, we determined that the Organizations did not maintain documentation of screenings on potential or current vendors, suppliers or contractors that were paid with Federal funds. Cause: The Organizations do not have a formal internal policy with respect to screening vendors, suppliers, contractors and employees in order to adhere to compliance over suspension and debarment. Effect or Potential Effect: The Organizations could make payments to an entity or individual that has been debarred or suspended by the US Government; such costs would be disallowed, and the Organizations could face consequences for lack of compliance. Questioned Costs: N/A Context: Our audit procedures consisted of testwork completed on subawards and individual expenditures charged to the Federal awards. The report in which samples were selected was generated directly from the Organizations' general ledger (accounting system). We consider our sample to be representative of the population. Identification as a Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: We recommend that management develop and implement a formal policy on suspension and debarment. This policy should include a threshold for when vendors, suppliers, contractors and employees should be screened. All screenings should be conducted prior to signing a contract or issuing payment. We recommend that the Organizations notify all employees of this policy and ensure that it is enforced during the upcoming fiscal year.
Finding 2023-002: Suspension and Debarment and U.S. Government Regulations on Terrorism Information on the Federal Programs: All Programs Criteria or Specific Requirement: CFR 200.213 "Reporting a determination that a non-Federal entity is not qualified for a Federal award" states that non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The non-Federal entity must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified, by (a) checking SAM Exclusions; (b) collecting a certification from that person; (c) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Condition: During our testing over Suspension and Debarment, we determined that the Organizations did not maintain documentation of screenings on potential or current vendors, suppliers or contractors that were paid with Federal funds. Cause: The Organizations do not have a formal internal policy with respect to screening vendors, suppliers, contractors and employees in order to adhere to compliance over suspension and debarment. Effect or Potential Effect: The Organizations could make payments to an entity or individual that has been debarred or suspended by the US Government; such costs would be disallowed, and the Organizations could face consequences for lack of compliance. Questioned Costs: N/A Context: Our audit procedures consisted of testwork completed on subawards and individual expenditures charged to the Federal awards. The report in which samples were selected was generated directly from the Organizations' general ledger (accounting system). We consider our sample to be representative of the population. Identification as a Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: We recommend that management develop and implement a formal policy on suspension and debarment. This policy should include a threshold for when vendors, suppliers, contractors and employees should be screened. All screenings should be conducted prior to signing a contract or issuing payment. We recommend that the Organizations notify all employees of this policy and ensure that it is enforced during the upcoming fiscal year.
Finding 2023-002: Suspension and Debarment and U.S. Government Regulations on Terrorism Information on the Federal Programs: All Programs Criteria or Specific Requirement: CFR 200.213 "Reporting a determination that a non-Federal entity is not qualified for a Federal award" states that non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The non-Federal entity must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified, by (a) checking SAM Exclusions; (b) collecting a certification from that person; (c) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Condition: During our testing over Suspension and Debarment, we determined that the Organizations did not maintain documentation of screenings on potential or current vendors, suppliers or contractors that were paid with Federal funds. Cause: The Organizations do not have a formal internal policy with respect to screening vendors, suppliers, contractors and employees in order to adhere to compliance over suspension and debarment. Effect or Potential Effect: The Organizations could make payments to an entity or individual that has been debarred or suspended by the US Government; such costs would be disallowed, and the Organizations could face consequences for lack of compliance. Questioned Costs: N/A Context: Our audit procedures consisted of testwork completed on subawards and individual expenditures charged to the Federal awards. The report in which samples were selected was generated directly from the Organizations' general ledger (accounting system). We consider our sample to be representative of the population. Identification as a Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: We recommend that management develop and implement a formal policy on suspension and debarment. This policy should include a threshold for when vendors, suppliers, contractors and employees should be screened. All screenings should be conducted prior to signing a contract or issuing payment. We recommend that the Organizations notify all employees of this policy and ensure that it is enforced during the upcoming fiscal year.
Finding 2023-002: Suspension and Debarment and U.S. Government Regulations on Terrorism Information on the Federal Programs: All Programs Criteria or Specific Requirement: CFR 200.213 "Reporting a determination that a non-Federal entity is not qualified for a Federal award" states that non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The non-Federal entity must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified, by (a) checking SAM Exclusions; (b) collecting a certification from that person; (c) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Condition: During our testing over Suspension and Debarment, we determined that the Organizations did not maintain documentation of screenings on potential or current vendors, suppliers or contractors that were paid with Federal funds. Cause: The Organizations do not have a formal internal policy with respect to screening vendors, suppliers, contractors and employees in order to adhere to compliance over suspension and debarment. Effect or Potential Effect: The Organizations could make payments to an entity or individual that has been debarred or suspended by the US Government; such costs would be disallowed, and the Organizations could face consequences for lack of compliance. Questioned Costs: N/A Context: Our audit procedures consisted of testwork completed on subawards and individual expenditures charged to the Federal awards. The report in which samples were selected was generated directly from the Organizations' general ledger (accounting system). We consider our sample to be representative of the population. Identification as a Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: We recommend that management develop and implement a formal policy on suspension and debarment. This policy should include a threshold for when vendors, suppliers, contractors and employees should be screened. All screenings should be conducted prior to signing a contract or issuing payment. We recommend that the Organizations notify all employees of this policy and ensure that it is enforced during the upcoming fiscal year.
Finding 2023-002: Suspension and Debarment and U.S. Government Regulations on Terrorism Information on the Federal Programs: All Programs Criteria or Specific Requirement: CFR 200.213 "Reporting a determination that a non-Federal entity is not qualified for a Federal award" states that non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The non-Federal entity must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified, by (a) checking SAM Exclusions; (b) collecting a certification from that person; (c) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Condition: During our testing over Suspension and Debarment, we determined that the Organizations did not maintain documentation of screenings on potential or current vendors, suppliers or contractors that were paid with Federal funds. Cause: The Organizations do not have a formal internal policy with respect to screening vendors, suppliers, contractors and employees in order to adhere to compliance over suspension and debarment. Effect or Potential Effect: The Organizations could make payments to an entity or individual that has been debarred or suspended by the US Government; such costs would be disallowed, and the Organizations could face consequences for lack of compliance. Questioned Costs: N/A Context: Our audit procedures consisted of testwork completed on subawards and individual expenditures charged to the Federal awards. The report in which samples were selected was generated directly from the Organizations' general ledger (accounting system). We consider our sample to be representative of the population. Identification as a Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: We recommend that management develop and implement a formal policy on suspension and debarment. This policy should include a threshold for when vendors, suppliers, contractors and employees should be screened. All screenings should be conducted prior to signing a contract or issuing payment. We recommend that the Organizations notify all employees of this policy and ensure that it is enforced during the upcoming fiscal year.
Finding 2023-002: Suspension and Debarment and U.S. Government Regulations on Terrorism Information on the Federal Programs: All Programs Criteria or Specific Requirement: CFR 200.213 "Reporting a determination that a non-Federal entity is not qualified for a Federal award" states that non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The non-Federal entity must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified, by (a) checking SAM Exclusions; (b) collecting a certification from that person; (c) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Condition: During our testing over Suspension and Debarment, we determined that the Organizations did not maintain documentation of screenings on potential or current vendors, suppliers or contractors that were paid with Federal funds. Cause: The Organizations do not have a formal internal policy with respect to screening vendors, suppliers, contractors and employees in order to adhere to compliance over suspension and debarment. Effect or Potential Effect: The Organizations could make payments to an entity or individual that has been debarred or suspended by the US Government; such costs would be disallowed, and the Organizations could face consequences for lack of compliance. Questioned Costs: N/A Context: Our audit procedures consisted of testwork completed on subawards and individual expenditures charged to the Federal awards. The report in which samples were selected was generated directly from the Organizations' general ledger (accounting system). We consider our sample to be representative of the population. Identification as a Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: We recommend that management develop and implement a formal policy on suspension and debarment. This policy should include a threshold for when vendors, suppliers, contractors and employees should be screened. All screenings should be conducted prior to signing a contract or issuing payment. We recommend that the Organizations notify all employees of this policy and ensure that it is enforced during the upcoming fiscal year.
Finding 2023-002: Suspension and Debarment and U.S. Government Regulations on Terrorism Information on the Federal Programs: All Programs Criteria or Specific Requirement: CFR 200.213 "Reporting a determination that a non-Federal entity is not qualified for a Federal award" states that non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The non-Federal entity must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified, by (a) checking SAM Exclusions; (b) collecting a certification from that person; (c) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Condition: During our testing over Suspension and Debarment, we determined that the Organizations did not maintain documentation of screenings on potential or current vendors, suppliers or contractors that were paid with Federal funds. Cause: The Organizations do not have a formal internal policy with respect to screening vendors, suppliers, contractors and employees in order to adhere to compliance over suspension and debarment. Effect or Potential Effect: The Organizations could make payments to an entity or individual that has been debarred or suspended by the US Government; such costs would be disallowed, and the Organizations could face consequences for lack of compliance. Questioned Costs: N/A Context: Our audit procedures consisted of testwork completed on subawards and individual expenditures charged to the Federal awards. The report in which samples were selected was generated directly from the Organizations' general ledger (accounting system). We consider our sample to be representative of the population. Identification as a Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: We recommend that management develop and implement a formal policy on suspension and debarment. This policy should include a threshold for when vendors, suppliers, contractors and employees should be screened. All screenings should be conducted prior to signing a contract or issuing payment. We recommend that the Organizations notify all employees of this policy and ensure that it is enforced during the upcoming fiscal year.
Finding 2023-002: Suspension and Debarment and U.S. Government Regulations on Terrorism Information on the Federal Programs: All Programs Criteria or Specific Requirement: CFR 200.213 "Reporting a determination that a non-Federal entity is not qualified for a Federal award" states that non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The non-Federal entity must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified, by (a) checking SAM Exclusions; (b) collecting a certification from that person; (c) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Condition: During our testing over Suspension and Debarment, we determined that the Organizations did not maintain documentation of screenings on potential or current vendors, suppliers or contractors that were paid with Federal funds. Cause: The Organizations do not have a formal internal policy with respect to screening vendors, suppliers, contractors and employees in order to adhere to compliance over suspension and debarment. Effect or Potential Effect: The Organizations could make payments to an entity or individual that has been debarred or suspended by the US Government; such costs would be disallowed, and the Organizations could face consequences for lack of compliance. Questioned Costs: N/A Context: Our audit procedures consisted of testwork completed on subawards and individual expenditures charged to the Federal awards. The report in which samples were selected was generated directly from the Organizations' general ledger (accounting system). We consider our sample to be representative of the population. Identification as a Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: We recommend that management develop and implement a formal policy on suspension and debarment. This policy should include a threshold for when vendors, suppliers, contractors and employees should be screened. All screenings should be conducted prior to signing a contract or issuing payment. We recommend that the Organizations notify all employees of this policy and ensure that it is enforced during the upcoming fiscal year.
2023-002 The County’s internal controls were inadequate for ensuring compliance with federal suspension and debarment requirements Assistance Listing Number and Title: 21.027 COVID-19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of the Treasury Federal Award/Contract Number: N/A Pass-through Entity Name: Washington State Department of Commerce Pass-through Award/Contract Number: 21-46190-117 24-4619D-115 Known Questioned Cost Amount: $0 Prior Year Audit Finding: N/A Background The purpose of the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) is to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic’s negative effects on public health and the economy, provide premium pay to essential workers during the pandemic, provide government services to the extent COVID-19 caused a reduction in revenues collected and make necessary investments in water, sewer or broadband infrastructure. In the fiscal year 2023, the County spent approximately $3.37 million in program funds for these activities. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and maintain internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding program requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. Federal requirements prohibit recipients from contracting with or purchasing from parties suspended or debarred from doing business with the federal government. Whenever the County enters into contracts or purchases goods or services that it expects to equal or exceed $25,000, paid all or in part with federal funds, it must verify the contractors were not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded. The County may verify this by obtaining a written certification from the contractor, adding a clause or condition into the contract that states the contractor is not suspended or debarred, or checking for exclusion records in the U.S. General Services Administration’s System for Award Management at SAM.gov. The County must verify this before entering into the contract, and it must keep documentation demonstrating compliance with this federal requirement. Description of Condition Although the County has a process to verify the suspension and debarment status for contractors it pays more than $25,000, our audit found the County did not follow this process and did not verify two contractors were not suspended or debarred before purchasing from them. We consider this deficiency in internal controls to be a material weakness that led to noncompliance. Cause of Condition When the County purchased an armored vehicle from another government’s contract through piggybacking, staff did not use the County’s standard process of checking SAM.gov for suspension and debarment exclusions or including suspension and debarment language in the contract. Instead, staff relied on the other government’s suspension and debarment verification to ensure compliance with this requirement. County staff did not realize that the County was also responsible for performing its own verification process. When the County purchased a water pump, staff responsible for checking the SAM.gov website mistakenly checked exclusion records for a different contractor. Effect of Condition The County did not obtain a written certification, insert a clause into the contract or check exclusion records to verify that two of its 10 contractors were not suspended or debarred. The County paid $415,373 to these two contractors. Without adequate internal controls, the County cannot ensure the contractors it pays with federal funds are eligible to participate in federal programs. Any program funds the County used to pay contractors that were suspended or debarred would be unallowable, and the federal grantor could potentially recover them. During the audit, we verified these contractors were not suspended or debarred. Therefore, we are not questioning costs for these payments. Recommendation We recommend the County strengthen its internal controls to verify all contractors it pays $25,000 or more, all or in part with federal funds, are not suspended or debarred from participating in federal programs before contracting with or purchasing from them. These controls should include verifying the suspension and debarment status of contractors independently when using piggybacking to purchase from them. County’s Response The County is committed to ensuring internal controls are adequate for compliance with federal suspension and debarment requirements. Management understands the seriousness of potentially awarding federal funds to ineligible parties and has taken steps to confirm that compliance is followed in future purchases using federal funds. An updated purchasing and contracting policy and procedures was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners in December of 2023. The document includes an updated section on suspension and debarment regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR Part 180, per §200.213. County offices and departments will ensure and document that no agreement for goods or services is entered into with any entity or person who has been disqualified from participation in Federal programs or activities. Program staff will do this by checking the federal System for Award Management (SAM.gov) prior to the contract execution date. If the contractor is not listed in SAM.gov, the County has created a certification of no debarment or suspension form that the contractor can attest to or the attestation may be added to the contract. Both the SAM.gov check and/or the certification of no debarment form must be completed at or before contract execution and documentation will be maintained in each contract file. The County is committed to providing training on federal grants at least annually to all county staff that work with them and anticipates full compliance with the suspension and debarment requirements moving forward. Auditor’s Remarks We appreciate the County’s quick response and commitment to resolving this finding. We thank it for its cooperation and assistance during the audit. We will review the corrective action taken during our next regular audit Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR Part 180, OMB Guidelines to Agencies on Governmentwide Department and Suspension (Nonprocurement) establishes nonprocurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689.
2023-002 The County’s internal controls were inadequate for ensuring compliance with federal suspension and debarment requirements Assistance Listing Number and Title: 21.027 COVID-19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of the Treasury Federal Award/Contract Number: N/A Pass-through Entity Name: Washington State Department of Commerce Pass-through Award/Contract Number: 21-46190-117 24-4619D-115 Known Questioned Cost Amount: $0 Prior Year Audit Finding: N/A Background The purpose of the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) is to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic’s negative effects on public health and the economy, provide premium pay to essential workers during the pandemic, provide government services to the extent COVID-19 caused a reduction in revenues collected and make necessary investments in water, sewer or broadband infrastructure. In the fiscal year 2023, the County spent approximately $3.37 million in program funds for these activities. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and maintain internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding program requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. Federal requirements prohibit recipients from contracting with or purchasing from parties suspended or debarred from doing business with the federal government. Whenever the County enters into contracts or purchases goods or services that it expects to equal or exceed $25,000, paid all or in part with federal funds, it must verify the contractors were not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded. The County may verify this by obtaining a written certification from the contractor, adding a clause or condition into the contract that states the contractor is not suspended or debarred, or checking for exclusion records in the U.S. General Services Administration’s System for Award Management at SAM.gov. The County must verify this before entering into the contract, and it must keep documentation demonstrating compliance with this federal requirement. Description of Condition Although the County has a process to verify the suspension and debarment status for contractors it pays more than $25,000, our audit found the County did not follow this process and did not verify two contractors were not suspended or debarred before purchasing from them. We consider this deficiency in internal controls to be a material weakness that led to noncompliance. Cause of Condition When the County purchased an armored vehicle from another government’s contract through piggybacking, staff did not use the County’s standard process of checking SAM.gov for suspension and debarment exclusions or including suspension and debarment language in the contract. Instead, staff relied on the other government’s suspension and debarment verification to ensure compliance with this requirement. County staff did not realize that the County was also responsible for performing its own verification process. When the County purchased a water pump, staff responsible for checking the SAM.gov website mistakenly checked exclusion records for a different contractor. Effect of Condition The County did not obtain a written certification, insert a clause into the contract or check exclusion records to verify that two of its 10 contractors were not suspended or debarred. The County paid $415,373 to these two contractors. Without adequate internal controls, the County cannot ensure the contractors it pays with federal funds are eligible to participate in federal programs. Any program funds the County used to pay contractors that were suspended or debarred would be unallowable, and the federal grantor could potentially recover them. During the audit, we verified these contractors were not suspended or debarred. Therefore, we are not questioning costs for these payments. Recommendation We recommend the County strengthen its internal controls to verify all contractors it pays $25,000 or more, all or in part with federal funds, are not suspended or debarred from participating in federal programs before contracting with or purchasing from them. These controls should include verifying the suspension and debarment status of contractors independently when using piggybacking to purchase from them. County’s Response The County is committed to ensuring internal controls are adequate for compliance with federal suspension and debarment requirements. Management understands the seriousness of potentially awarding federal funds to ineligible parties and has taken steps to confirm that compliance is followed in future purchases using federal funds. An updated purchasing and contracting policy and procedures was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners in December of 2023. The document includes an updated section on suspension and debarment regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR Part 180, per §200.213. County offices and departments will ensure and document that no agreement for goods or services is entered into with any entity or person who has been disqualified from participation in Federal programs or activities. Program staff will do this by checking the federal System for Award Management (SAM.gov) prior to the contract execution date. If the contractor is not listed in SAM.gov, the County has created a certification of no debarment or suspension form that the contractor can attest to or the attestation may be added to the contract. Both the SAM.gov check and/or the certification of no debarment form must be completed at or before contract execution and documentation will be maintained in each contract file. The County is committed to providing training on federal grants at least annually to all county staff that work with them and anticipates full compliance with the suspension and debarment requirements moving forward. Auditor’s Remarks We appreciate the County’s quick response and commitment to resolving this finding. We thank it for its cooperation and assistance during the audit. We will review the corrective action taken during our next regular audit Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR Part 180, OMB Guidelines to Agencies on Governmentwide Department and Suspension (Nonprocurement) establishes nonprocurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689.
2023-002 The County’s internal controls were inadequate for ensuring compliance with federal suspension and debarment requirements Assistance Listing Number and Title: 21.027 COVID-19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of the Treasury Federal Award/Contract Number: N/A Pass-through Entity Name: Washington State Department of Commerce Pass-through Award/Contract Number: 21-46190-117 24-4619D-115 Known Questioned Cost Amount: $0 Prior Year Audit Finding: N/A Background The purpose of the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) is to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic’s negative effects on public health and the economy, provide premium pay to essential workers during the pandemic, provide government services to the extent COVID-19 caused a reduction in revenues collected and make necessary investments in water, sewer or broadband infrastructure. In the fiscal year 2023, the County spent approximately $3.37 million in program funds for these activities. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and maintain internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding program requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. Federal requirements prohibit recipients from contracting with or purchasing from parties suspended or debarred from doing business with the federal government. Whenever the County enters into contracts or purchases goods or services that it expects to equal or exceed $25,000, paid all or in part with federal funds, it must verify the contractors were not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded. The County may verify this by obtaining a written certification from the contractor, adding a clause or condition into the contract that states the contractor is not suspended or debarred, or checking for exclusion records in the U.S. General Services Administration’s System for Award Management at SAM.gov. The County must verify this before entering into the contract, and it must keep documentation demonstrating compliance with this federal requirement. Description of Condition Although the County has a process to verify the suspension and debarment status for contractors it pays more than $25,000, our audit found the County did not follow this process and did not verify two contractors were not suspended or debarred before purchasing from them. We consider this deficiency in internal controls to be a material weakness that led to noncompliance. Cause of Condition When the County purchased an armored vehicle from another government’s contract through piggybacking, staff did not use the County’s standard process of checking SAM.gov for suspension and debarment exclusions or including suspension and debarment language in the contract. Instead, staff relied on the other government’s suspension and debarment verification to ensure compliance with this requirement. County staff did not realize that the County was also responsible for performing its own verification process. When the County purchased a water pump, staff responsible for checking the SAM.gov website mistakenly checked exclusion records for a different contractor. Effect of Condition The County did not obtain a written certification, insert a clause into the contract or check exclusion records to verify that two of its 10 contractors were not suspended or debarred. The County paid $415,373 to these two contractors. Without adequate internal controls, the County cannot ensure the contractors it pays with federal funds are eligible to participate in federal programs. Any program funds the County used to pay contractors that were suspended or debarred would be unallowable, and the federal grantor could potentially recover them. During the audit, we verified these contractors were not suspended or debarred. Therefore, we are not questioning costs for these payments. Recommendation We recommend the County strengthen its internal controls to verify all contractors it pays $25,000 or more, all or in part with federal funds, are not suspended or debarred from participating in federal programs before contracting with or purchasing from them. These controls should include verifying the suspension and debarment status of contractors independently when using piggybacking to purchase from them. County’s Response The County is committed to ensuring internal controls are adequate for compliance with federal suspension and debarment requirements. Management understands the seriousness of potentially awarding federal funds to ineligible parties and has taken steps to confirm that compliance is followed in future purchases using federal funds. An updated purchasing and contracting policy and procedures was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners in December of 2023. The document includes an updated section on suspension and debarment regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR Part 180, per §200.213. County offices and departments will ensure and document that no agreement for goods or services is entered into with any entity or person who has been disqualified from participation in Federal programs or activities. Program staff will do this by checking the federal System for Award Management (SAM.gov) prior to the contract execution date. If the contractor is not listed in SAM.gov, the County has created a certification of no debarment or suspension form that the contractor can attest to or the attestation may be added to the contract. Both the SAM.gov check and/or the certification of no debarment form must be completed at or before contract execution and documentation will be maintained in each contract file. The County is committed to providing training on federal grants at least annually to all county staff that work with them and anticipates full compliance with the suspension and debarment requirements moving forward. Auditor’s Remarks We appreciate the County’s quick response and commitment to resolving this finding. We thank it for its cooperation and assistance during the audit. We will review the corrective action taken during our next regular audit Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR Part 180, OMB Guidelines to Agencies on Governmentwide Department and Suspension (Nonprocurement) establishes nonprocurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Federal Program Title: COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Name of Pass-through Entity: New Jersey Department of State Business Action Center Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR section 200.213 and 180.300, non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the nonfederal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management ("SAM") Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration ("GSA") and available at SAM.gov, (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR section 180.300). Condition: During our testing, we noted that CNJ did not provide adequate supporting documentation demonstrating that proper suspension and debarment checks were performed. Cause: CNJ did not have adequate policies, procedures, and controls in place to ensure compliance with suspension and debarment requirements. Effect or Potential Effect: Failure to timely verify that a vendor is not suspended or debarred could result in entering into a contract with an entity that is barred from performing work for the U.S. government. Questioned Costs: None Context: For 3 procurement samples out of a total of 3 tested, management did not provide adequate supporting documentation for the suspension and debarment check. However, subsequent verification revealed that none of the vendors selected were suspended or debarred. Identification as a Repeat Finding: This finding is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that CNJ establish written procurement policies and procedures, including checks for suspension and debarment, to ensure that CNJ is in compliance with the Uniform Guidance and that all staff are trained on this policy to ensure compliance and related internal controls over compliance are operating effectively. Responsible Official's Response: Choose New Jersey ("CNJ") understands the findings outlined in the audit report. CNJ has updated its procurement procedures for the federal grant to align with 2 CFR section 200.213 and 2 CFR section 180.300. To ensure that vendors supporting efforts on the federal grant are not suspended or debarred from doing business with the federal government, CNJ has added a task in our Procurement Summary (procurement checklist) that specifically requires the project manager and Chief Administrative Officer ("CAO") to verify the vendor’s eligibility in the System for Award Management ("SAM") maintained by the General Services Administration ("GSA") (available at SAM.gov). In addition to the verification that the vendor is not prohibited (debarred or suspended) from providing services to or contracting with the United States government, CNJ will retain a copy of the verification for the procurement file. This action will be completed during the vendor evaluation stage of the procurement and before contract is awarded to the vendor. It should be noted that the vendors selected for testing for 2023 were found to be in good standing. Corrective action incorporation has already begun and will be fully implemented by 10/15/2024.
Identification of the federal program: Federal Agencies: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-Through Entities: Ohio Department of Health Assistance Listing No: 93.354 Public Health Emergency Response: Cooperative Agreement for Emergency Response: Public Health Crisis Response, 93.493 Congressional Directives, and 21.027 COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Recovery Funds Award Period: 2023 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” The Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.213 states, “Non-federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR Part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities”. Condition: We identified the following matters during our testing of suspension and debarment control processes: a) A third-party vendor performed the suspension and debarment validation process for Akron Children’s. The third-party vendor does not have a SOC 1 (System and Organization Controls) Report. For most of 2023, Akron Children’s relied on the suspension and debarment checks performed by the third-party vendor for results concluding no match without completing a validation control to ensure the results provided by the third party were accurate. b) Akron Children’s did not retain the supporting documentation of the reconciliation of the vendor list that is received from the third-party vendor that is used to perform the suspension and debarment checks after the suspension and debarment checks are performed to ensure the listing is complete and agrees to the vendor list provided by Akron Children’s to the third-party vendor. Cause: Akron Children’s did not have policies and procedures that require a validation of the third-party’s controls be performed to ensure that the suspension and debarment checks performed by the third-party vendor aligned with the governmental suspension and debarment database when the search resulted in no match. In addition, Akron Children’s did not have policies and procedures in place to require that documentation is retained to support the reconciliations performed between the vendor list sent to the third-party vendor and the results provided by the third-party vendor. Effect or potential effect: Akron Children’s screening for suspension and debarment through the third-party vendor results may not be accurate. By failing to retain the documentation of the reconciliation of vendor files to the third-party vendor search results, sufficient evidence was not retained to prove that the reconciliation took place. As a result, there was not sufficient evidence to validate the appropriate internal controls took place to prevent Akron Children’s from transacting with a vendor that was suspended or debarred, which was ultimately charged to a federal program. Questioned costs: None. Context: The federal portion of expenditures subject to suspension and debarment represents approximately 84% of total federal expenditures for the programs of $10,888,195 for the year ended December 31, 2023. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: The finding is a repeat finding from the prior year – 2022-002, as it relates to 93.354 Public Health Emergency Response: Cooperative Agreement for Emergency Response: Public Health Crisis Response. Recommendation: Management should add controls to validate the accuracy of the suspension and debarment search results performed by the third-party vendor when the search results in no match. Views of responsible officials: Akron Children's remediated these findings in the fourth quarter of 2023 by: 1) Implementing a periodic independent review of a sample of vendors sent to the third-party vendor to ensure that the processes employed by third-party vendor are accurate. 2) Developing a retention process for all vendor searches and file submissions to evidence compliance with the Federal regulations, including an independent review of the accuracy of file submissions. Further, a contract management system was installed in 2023 that holds the validation of new vendors as acceptable for federal procurements.
Identification of the federal program: Federal Agencies: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-Through Entities: Ohio Department of Health Assistance Listing No: 93.354 Public Health Emergency Response: Cooperative Agreement for Emergency Response: Public Health Crisis Response, 93.493 Congressional Directives, and 21.027 COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Recovery Funds Award Period: 2023 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” The Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.213 states, “Non-federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR Part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities”. Condition: We identified the following matters during our testing of suspension and debarment control processes: a) A third-party vendor performed the suspension and debarment validation process for Akron Children’s. The third-party vendor does not have a SOC 1 (System and Organization Controls) Report. For most of 2023, Akron Children’s relied on the suspension and debarment checks performed by the third-party vendor for results concluding no match without completing a validation control to ensure the results provided by the third party were accurate. b) Akron Children’s did not retain the supporting documentation of the reconciliation of the vendor list that is received from the third-party vendor that is used to perform the suspension and debarment checks after the suspension and debarment checks are performed to ensure the listing is complete and agrees to the vendor list provided by Akron Children’s to the third-party vendor. Cause: Akron Children’s did not have policies and procedures that require a validation of the third-party’s controls be performed to ensure that the suspension and debarment checks performed by the third-party vendor aligned with the governmental suspension and debarment database when the search resulted in no match. In addition, Akron Children’s did not have policies and procedures in place to require that documentation is retained to support the reconciliations performed between the vendor list sent to the third-party vendor and the results provided by the third-party vendor. Effect or potential effect: Akron Children’s screening for suspension and debarment through the third-party vendor results may not be accurate. By failing to retain the documentation of the reconciliation of vendor files to the third-party vendor search results, sufficient evidence was not retained to prove that the reconciliation took place. As a result, there was not sufficient evidence to validate the appropriate internal controls took place to prevent Akron Children’s from transacting with a vendor that was suspended or debarred, which was ultimately charged to a federal program. Questioned costs: None. Context: The federal portion of expenditures subject to suspension and debarment represents approximately 84% of total federal expenditures for the programs of $10,888,195 for the year ended December 31, 2023. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: The finding is a repeat finding from the prior year – 2022-002, as it relates to 93.354 Public Health Emergency Response: Cooperative Agreement for Emergency Response: Public Health Crisis Response. Recommendation: Management should add controls to validate the accuracy of the suspension and debarment search results performed by the third-party vendor when the search results in no match. Views of responsible officials: Akron Children's remediated these findings in the fourth quarter of 2023 by: 1) Implementing a periodic independent review of a sample of vendors sent to the third-party vendor to ensure that the processes employed by third-party vendor are accurate. 2) Developing a retention process for all vendor searches and file submissions to evidence compliance with the Federal regulations, including an independent review of the accuracy of file submissions. Further, a contract management system was installed in 2023 that holds the validation of new vendors as acceptable for federal procurements.
Identification of the federal program: Federal Agencies: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-Through Entities: Ohio Department of Health Assistance Listing No: 93.354 Public Health Emergency Response: Cooperative Agreement for Emergency Response: Public Health Crisis Response, 93.493 Congressional Directives, and 21.027 COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Recovery Funds Award Period: 2023 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” The Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.213 states, “Non-federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR Part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities”. Condition: We identified the following matters during our testing of suspension and debarment control processes: a) A third-party vendor performed the suspension and debarment validation process for Akron Children’s. The third-party vendor does not have a SOC 1 (System and Organization Controls) Report. For most of 2023, Akron Children’s relied on the suspension and debarment checks performed by the third-party vendor for results concluding no match without completing a validation control to ensure the results provided by the third party were accurate. b) Akron Children’s did not retain the supporting documentation of the reconciliation of the vendor list that is received from the third-party vendor that is used to perform the suspension and debarment checks after the suspension and debarment checks are performed to ensure the listing is complete and agrees to the vendor list provided by Akron Children’s to the third-party vendor. Cause: Akron Children’s did not have policies and procedures that require a validation of the third-party’s controls be performed to ensure that the suspension and debarment checks performed by the third-party vendor aligned with the governmental suspension and debarment database when the search resulted in no match. In addition, Akron Children’s did not have policies and procedures in place to require that documentation is retained to support the reconciliations performed between the vendor list sent to the third-party vendor and the results provided by the third-party vendor. Effect or potential effect: Akron Children’s screening for suspension and debarment through the third-party vendor results may not be accurate. By failing to retain the documentation of the reconciliation of vendor files to the third-party vendor search results, sufficient evidence was not retained to prove that the reconciliation took place. As a result, there was not sufficient evidence to validate the appropriate internal controls took place to prevent Akron Children’s from transacting with a vendor that was suspended or debarred, which was ultimately charged to a federal program. Questioned costs: None. Context: The federal portion of expenditures subject to suspension and debarment represents approximately 84% of total federal expenditures for the programs of $10,888,195 for the year ended December 31, 2023. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: The finding is a repeat finding from the prior year – 2022-002, as it relates to 93.354 Public Health Emergency Response: Cooperative Agreement for Emergency Response: Public Health Crisis Response. Recommendation: Management should add controls to validate the accuracy of the suspension and debarment search results performed by the third-party vendor when the search results in no match. Views of responsible officials: Akron Children's remediated these findings in the fourth quarter of 2023 by: 1) Implementing a periodic independent review of a sample of vendors sent to the third-party vendor to ensure that the processes employed by third-party vendor are accurate. 2) Developing a retention process for all vendor searches and file submissions to evidence compliance with the Federal regulations, including an independent review of the accuracy of file submissions. Further, a contract management system was installed in 2023 that holds the validation of new vendors as acceptable for federal procurements.
Finding 2023-003: Federal Procurement Requirements for Suspension and Debarment Information on the Federal Program: CFDA 14.135—U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Section 221(d)(4) Mortgage Insurance Rental Housing for the Elderly, grant number 113-35459. Criteria: Uniform Guidance §200.213, Suspension and Debarment, states that non-federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities. To ensure compliance with HUD regulations, the Village should have internal controls in place to ensure no contracts are entered into with vendors who are debarred or suspended from participation in federal programs. Condition: Procurement procedures applied for the year ended December 31, 2023 included a control to verify vendors were not debarred or suspended from participation in federal programs. This was identified in a test of a sample of contracts procured in 2023 and during our walkthrough of internal controls. None of the vendors selected in the testing were debarred or suspended, but no step was documented by the Village to ensure this was the case. Cause: The internal control process for the Village did not require the retention of proper documentation for this specific requirement in the federal procurement requirements. Effect or Potential Effect: Entering into contracts with debarred or suspended vendors could lead to noncompliance with HUD regulations and could result in corrective action by HUD. Questioned Costs: $0. The audit testing identified no vendors who were suspended or debarred. Context / Sampling: The finding was identified in our test of a non-statistical sample of two vendors requiring suspension and debarment procedures. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): Yes Recommendation: The board of directors and management of the Village should ensure the Village’s policies for procurement activities are consistent with current federal requirements, and a review of internal controls should be performed to ensure all such requirements are addressed by procurement procedures being performed. Responsible Official’s Response: Management will modify its internal control practices to ensure procurement activities are consistent with the current federal requirements and specifically with the regard to ensuring contractual parties are not disbarred. This is to ensure compliance with HUD entering into contracts with vendors who are disbarred or suspended from participation in federal programs. Maintain documentation in each vendor file to verify selected vendors are not disbarred or suspended. Planned Implementation Date of Corrective Action: Management will implement this change immediately. Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Executive Director.
Child and Adult Care Food Program - Procurement Information on Federal Program: U.S. Department of Agriculture Child and Adult Care Food Program (Federal Assistance Listing Number 10.558) passed through the New York State Department of Health. Criteria: CFR Section 200.318 stipulates that a non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable state, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in Part 200 Subpart D. Additionally, 2 CFR Section 200.213 stipulates that no awards, subawards, or contracts be awarded to parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Statement of Condition: During our discussions with management, we noted that the Organization is not following its procurement procedures for the Child and Adult Care Food Program purchases and it is not verifying the eligibility of vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs on an annual basis. Statement of Cause: The Organization did not review compliance requirements related to procurement outlined in 2 CFR Section 200.318 and Section 200.213. Statement of Effect: The Organization is not in compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.213. The Organization is not performing required procedures, as a result, vendors that are not eligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities could be selected or the Organization could be overpaying for goods and services. Questioned Costs: None. Perspective Information: As part of the required procurement testing, a review of a sampling of the vendors charged to the Child and Adult Care Food program and therefore represented purchases with federal dollars was performed. Of the Organization’s vendors charged, none selected were suspended or debarred from participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization review the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.213 and ensure that their procurement procedures are being followed and that a review of the eligibility of potential vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs or activities is performed prior to disbursing funds to the vendor. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Brightside Up, Inc. will review the procurement policy and document considerations for any vendors that meet the thresholds and make sure they are in compliance under Sam.gov.
Finding 2023-005: Suspension and Debarment (Significant Deficiency) Information on the Federal Program: ALN 19.663 Global Telecommunications and Emerging Technology Training Criteria: Under 2 CFR §200.213, non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations included in Executive Orders 12549 and 12689 and 2 CFR part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The non-Federal entity must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified, by (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Condition: During our testing over Suspension and Debarment, we determined that USTTI did not perform screenings on potential or current vendors, suppliers or contractors that were paid with Federal funds. Cause: USTTI does not have a formal internal policy with respect to screening vendors, suppliers, contractors and employees in order to adhere to compliance over suspension and debarment. Effect: Failure to screen potential and current vendors, suppliers, contractors and employees increases the potential that Federal funds be inadvertently provided to parties deemed to be suspended or disbarred by the United States Government. Questioned Costs: None. Context: We noted that none of the vendors, suppliers etc. selected for testing had a formally documented Suspension and Debarment check conducted prior to payment of their invoices.Context (Continued): Due to the timing of the audit for the year ended December 31, 2022, USTTI was not able to formalize a policy for the year ended December 31, 2023. We noted that USTTI has formalized a suspension and debarment policy during the year ended December 31, 2024. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Yes. See Finding 2022-04. Recommendation: We recommend that management develop and implement a formal policy on suspension and debarment. This policy should include a threshold for when vendors, suppliers, contractors and employees should be screened. All screenings should be conducted prior to signing a contract or issuing payment. We recommend that USTTI notify all employees of this policy and ensure that it is enforced during the upcoming fiscal year.
Agency U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration ALN 20.232 Commercial Driver’s License Program Implementation Federal Award Identification Number 69A3601840118CDL0NV 69A3601940354CDL0NV 69A3602040472CDL0NV 69A3602140719CDL0NV 69A3602240864CDL0NV Criteria According to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 200.213, non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards to parties that are suspended or debarred. The non-federal entity must verify that the contractor or subrecipient is not suspended or debarred through the System for Award Management (SAM), which includes reviewing the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS), or by collecting a certification from the entity. Condition and Context The College failed to perform the required search for suspension and debarment in SAM for one of the two contractors tested prior to awarding a contract under the federal program. The search should have been performed to ensure that the contractor was not suspended or debarred. Cause The one vendor noted was a long standing contractor for multiple years with the College and the College made the determination that this requirement was not applicable when these services were being contracted to be renewed. Repeat Finding No Recommendation We recommend that the College implement and adhere to a strict protocol for verifying suspension and debarment status prior to awarding any contracts or subawards under federal programs. This protocol should include performing searches in SAM, documenting the results of the searches, and maintaining evidence of compliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: See attached corrective action plan Questioned Costs None
Finding 2023-002 – Procurement, Suspension and Debarment (Material Weakness in Internal Controls over Compliance and Material Noncompliance) Major Program Affected – AL Number Program Name Award Number Award Year 93.441 Indian Self-Determination 248-96-0027 2023 Criteria – The Tribe’s procurement policies and procedures require at least three written bids or quotes for purchases over $2,500. Federal regulations require that grantees have controls in place to verify that vendors are not suspended or debarred prior to entering into contracts for goods or services exceeding $25,000. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.213, federal regulations and criteria of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (ISDEAA) requires that full bid and open competition be promoted in soliciting offers and awarding contracts for purchases. Contracting without providing for full and open competition is only permitted if there is only one responsible source and no other supplies or services will satisfy agency requirements, among other circumstances. Condition and Context – During the year, the Tribe had eight vendor contracts for the Indian Self-Determination program with expenditures greater than $2,500. Using a random sample methodology, we selected a sample of two vendors. For both vendors tested, we noted there was no evidence that three written bids or quotes were obtained prior to vendor selection. The Tribe provided sole source justification, however, the description for justifying limiting competition was not in accordance with the Tribe’s procurement policy. The Tribe had two vendor contracts with expenditures greater than $25,000. For both vendors tested, we noted there was no evidence that a suspension and debarment check was performed before entering into contracts or making payments to the vendors. Based on our verification on www.sam.gov, we noted both vendors were not suspended or debarred. Cause – A combination of lack of adequate personnel, and insufficient internal controls over the procurement, suspension and debarment procedures may have contributed to this finding. Additionally, the Tribe’s procurement policies do not address the suspension and debarment requirements. Effect – The Tribe could be subjected to questioned costs or other sanctions from funding agencies if they determine the program did not follow its procurement policies. The Tribe could be subjected to questioned costs or other sanctions from funding agencies if they determine vendors paid with federal funding were suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs – We are unable to determine if the Tribe could have obtained a better price for procurement that was not made through a full and open competitive process, and as such we cannot determine if any overpayment may have occurred. Therefore, questioned costs are unknown. Further, the vendors we tested were not suspended or debarred, so there are no question costs to report related to suspension and debarment requirements. Recommendation – We recommend the Tribe re-evaluate its internal controls over procurement, suspension and debarment and implement a supervisory review process to ensure compliance with the Tribe’s policies. We also recommend the Tribe consider updating its procurement policy in accordance with the 2024 Revisions to the Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200), which would reduce undue burden on the Tribe’s finance and program manager personnel and Tribal Council. Views of Responsible Officials – The Tribe has continued to train new program and department staff regarding procurement thresholds for Request for Proposal’s (RFP’s) and will update the continued training with emphasis on threshold amounts to endure adherence to the current procurement policy. The Tribe has experienced a large amount of program and department personnel turned over post pandemic resulting in program staff that were only minimally trained. The Tribe will complete a comprehensive review of the RFP process and purpose changes to our internal policy and controls to align in the future with guidance standards. The Tribe will implement a two-part process to review bidding procedures to ensure alignment with existing policies. The Tribe has implemented a new debarment procedure that uses time and date stamp information on all debarment searches and an of attestation of search being done and by whom.
Finding 2023-007: Suspension and Debarment Information on the Federal Program: 97.024 - Emergency Food and Shelter National Board Program Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material NoncomplianceCriteria: Under 2 CFR §200.213, non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The non-Federal entity must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified, by (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Condition: During our testing over Suspension and Debarment, we determined that SAMU either did not perform screenings, or did not document the screening date on potential or current vendors, suppliers, contractors or employees that were paid with Federal funds. Cause: SAMU does not have a formal internal policy with respect to screening vendors, suppliers, contractors and employees in order to adhere to compliance over suspension and debarment. Effect or Potential Effect: Failure to screen, in a timely manner (before contract date or payment occurs) potential and current vendors, suppliers, contractors and employees increases the potential that Federal funds be inadvertently provided to parties deemed to be suspended or disbarred by the United States Government. Questioned Costs: $24,000 Context: Out of 4 samples selected for testing, we noted the following: 2 samples did not have evidence of the date of the SAM check being performed; 1 sample had a SAM check date performed after execution of the contract with the vendor; 1 sample did not have a SAM check performed at all. The sample is representative of the population. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: 2022-007 Recommendation: We recommend that management develop and implement a formal policy on suspension and debarment. All screenings should be conducted prior to entering into an agreement with a vendor. Additionally, evidence of documentation should include the date of when the SAM check was performed. We recommend that SAMU notify all employees of this policy and ensure that it is enforced during the upcoming year.
Identification of the federal program: Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Pass-Through Entities: North Dakota Department of Health, South Dakota Department of Health and Minnesota Department of Health Assistance Listing: 93.155; COVID-19 Rural Health Research Centers Award Numbers: Various Award Year: FY 2021 – 2023 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” The Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.213 states, “Non-federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR Part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities”. In addition, Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.320 (c) states: “There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold; (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate.” Further, Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.320(a)(2) states: Small purchases – “The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity.” Condition: We noted the following matters during our testing of Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements: • A third-party vendor performed the suspension and debarment validation process for Sanford. The third-party vendor does not have a SOC 1 (System and Organization Controls) Report. For a portion of the year, Sanford relied on the suspension and debarment checks performed by the third-party vendor for results concluding no match without completing a validation control to ensure the results provided by the third-party vendor were accurate. • We noted instances where the vendor screening for suspension and debarment was not performed prior to setting up the vendor in the System and procuring the goods/services. Section III—Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) • For certain procurement transactions tested, we noted Sanford did not adhere to the compliance requirements and did not follow its procurement policy by maintaining documentation related to cost/price analysis or sole-source procurement and completing the sole-source justification forms timely. Cause: Sanford utilizes a third-party vendor to perform suspension and debarment checks on its vendors, both during the vendor setup process as well as ongoing monitoring of active vendors. Sanford did not add an additional validation control until August 2023 to ensure that the suspension and debarment checks performed by the third-party vendor aligned with the governmental suspension and debarment database when the search resulted in no match. In addition, Sanford did not follow its procurement policy and perform the vendor screening for suspension and debarment prior to setting up the vendor in the system and transacting with the vendors. Furthermore, Sanford, prior to entering into the procurement transaction, did not complete the sole-source justification forms, or maintain documentation to support the sole-sourced procurements for those procurement transactions that exceeded the small purchase threshold. Effect or potential effect: Sanford’s screening for suspension and debarment through the third-party vendor results may not be accurate for the period January 1, 2023 through July 31, 2023. Further, by not performing the vendor screening for suspension and debarment prior to transacting with the vendor, Sanford could have potentially entered into a business transaction with suspended or debarred parties. Sanford did not comply with the federal procurement requirements and its procurement policy by not maintaining adequate documentation to support the cost/price analysis or sole sourced vendor selections in addition to not timely completing the sole source justification forms. Section III—Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Questioned costs: $307,249 determined as the amount of the procurement expenditures included in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for two procurement transactions that had inadequate documentation to justify sole source selection. Context: To ensure compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.213, Sanford conducts both preventive and detective controls in its vendor setup and monitoring process to ensure new vendors and active vendors are not suspended or debarred. A consistent vendor setup process is followed for each new vendor that Sanford transacts with, regardless of whether the vendor transactions are funded through federal grant funding or through other sources. To prevent a suspended or debarred vendor from being added as a new vendor, the vendor is checked against the suspension and debarment database electronically before completion of the vendor setup. Subsequent to vendor setup, Sanford also monitors the status of its vendors to ensure the vendor’s status has not changed. We selected 25 new vendors to verify that the suspension and debarment screening was performed and performed timely. We noted for 3 of the 25 vendors, the suspension and debarment screening was not performed prior to setting up the vendor in the system and for 1 of these vendors, Sanford had entered into a transaction prior to performing the suspension and debarment screening. We selected 8 procurement transactions that exceeded the small purchase threshold. Of the 8 transactions, 4 transactions did not follow the federal procurement standards and Sanford’s procurement policy which requires sole source documentation be completed prior to procuring the items. Additionally, for 2 of these 4 transactions, Sanford did not have sufficient documentation maintained to support the cost/price analysis performed or justification to support the sole source selection of the vendors. Total federal expenditures subject to suspension and debarment is $2,870,421, and federal expenditures exceeding the micro purchase threshold is $2,298,733. Total federal expenditures under the program, as reported on the SEFA, is $2,870,421. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This finding is a repeat of Finding 2022-001 in the prior year. Recommendation: Management should ensure that the suspension and debarment screening is performed prior to entering into the transaction with the vendor and also ensure that it follows the procurement policy to verify suspension and debarment of the vendor prior to setting up the vendor in the system. In addition, Management should ensure that any sole sourced purchases or when quotes are obtained, that those be documented prior to entering into the procurement transaction. Views of responsible officials: Sanford continues to document periodic validation of the suspension and debarment search results performed by the third-party vendor for vendor searches that yield no suspension and debarment match. Additionally, as part of the periodic validation, Sanford will include a validation to ensure a suspension and debarment search is completed prior to setting the vendor up in the system. Sanford will re-educate appropriate staff regarding the process to verify a suspension and debarment search is completed prior to setting up the vendor in the system. Sanford’s preventative and detective controls and operating procedures provide reasonable assurance over the effectiveness of the controls necessary to prevent the risk of federal funds being paid to vendors that are suspended or debarred. Sanford’s preventive and detective controls and operating procedures provide reasonable assurance over the effectiveness of the controls necessary to prevent the risk of federal funds being utilized for items that do not adhere to the procurement standards. Sanford will re-educate applicable parties and enhance its procedural documentation regarding procurement. Sanford will implement a monthly review process of federal funds utilized for procurement.
Identification of the federal program: Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Pass-Through Entities: North Dakota Department of Health, South Dakota Department of Health and Minnesota Department of Health Assistance Listing: 93.155; COVID-19 Rural Health Research Centers Award Numbers: Various Award Year: FY 2021 – 2023 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” The Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.213 states, “Non-federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR Part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities”. In addition, Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.320 (c) states: “There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold; (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate.” Further, Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.320(a)(2) states: Small purchases – “The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity.” Condition: We noted the following matters during our testing of Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements: • A third-party vendor performed the suspension and debarment validation process for Sanford. The third-party vendor does not have a SOC 1 (System and Organization Controls) Report. For a portion of the year, Sanford relied on the suspension and debarment checks performed by the third-party vendor for results concluding no match without completing a validation control to ensure the results provided by the third-party vendor were accurate. • We noted instances where the vendor screening for suspension and debarment was not performed prior to setting up the vendor in the System and procuring the goods/services. Section III—Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) • For certain procurement transactions tested, we noted Sanford did not adhere to the compliance requirements and did not follow its procurement policy by maintaining documentation related to cost/price analysis or sole-source procurement and completing the sole-source justification forms timely. Cause: Sanford utilizes a third-party vendor to perform suspension and debarment checks on its vendors, both during the vendor setup process as well as ongoing monitoring of active vendors. Sanford did not add an additional validation control until August 2023 to ensure that the suspension and debarment checks performed by the third-party vendor aligned with the governmental suspension and debarment database when the search resulted in no match. In addition, Sanford did not follow its procurement policy and perform the vendor screening for suspension and debarment prior to setting up the vendor in the system and transacting with the vendors. Furthermore, Sanford, prior to entering into the procurement transaction, did not complete the sole-source justification forms, or maintain documentation to support the sole-sourced procurements for those procurement transactions that exceeded the small purchase threshold. Effect or potential effect: Sanford’s screening for suspension and debarment through the third-party vendor results may not be accurate for the period January 1, 2023 through July 31, 2023. Further, by not performing the vendor screening for suspension and debarment prior to transacting with the vendor, Sanford could have potentially entered into a business transaction with suspended or debarred parties. Sanford did not comply with the federal procurement requirements and its procurement policy by not maintaining adequate documentation to support the cost/price analysis or sole sourced vendor selections in addition to not timely completing the sole source justification forms. Section III—Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Questioned costs: $307,249 determined as the amount of the procurement expenditures included in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for two procurement transactions that had inadequate documentation to justify sole source selection. Context: To ensure compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.213, Sanford conducts both preventive and detective controls in its vendor setup and monitoring process to ensure new vendors and active vendors are not suspended or debarred. A consistent vendor setup process is followed for each new vendor that Sanford transacts with, regardless of whether the vendor transactions are funded through federal grant funding or through other sources. To prevent a suspended or debarred vendor from being added as a new vendor, the vendor is checked against the suspension and debarment database electronically before completion of the vendor setup. Subsequent to vendor setup, Sanford also monitors the status of its vendors to ensure the vendor’s status has not changed. We selected 25 new vendors to verify that the suspension and debarment screening was performed and performed timely. We noted for 3 of the 25 vendors, the suspension and debarment screening was not performed prior to setting up the vendor in the system and for 1 of these vendors, Sanford had entered into a transaction prior to performing the suspension and debarment screening. We selected 8 procurement transactions that exceeded the small purchase threshold. Of the 8 transactions, 4 transactions did not follow the federal procurement standards and Sanford’s procurement policy which requires sole source documentation be completed prior to procuring the items. Additionally, for 2 of these 4 transactions, Sanford did not have sufficient documentation maintained to support the cost/price analysis performed or justification to support the sole source selection of the vendors. Total federal expenditures subject to suspension and debarment is $2,870,421, and federal expenditures exceeding the micro purchase threshold is $2,298,733. Total federal expenditures under the program, as reported on the SEFA, is $2,870,421. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This finding is a repeat of Finding 2022-001 in the prior year. Recommendation: Management should ensure that the suspension and debarment screening is performed prior to entering into the transaction with the vendor and also ensure that it follows the procurement policy to verify suspension and debarment of the vendor prior to setting up the vendor in the system. In addition, Management should ensure that any sole sourced purchases or when quotes are obtained, that those be documented prior to entering into the procurement transaction. Views of responsible officials: Sanford continues to document periodic validation of the suspension and debarment search results performed by the third-party vendor for vendor searches that yield no suspension and debarment match. Additionally, as part of the periodic validation, Sanford will include a validation to ensure a suspension and debarment search is completed prior to setting the vendor up in the system. Sanford will re-educate appropriate staff regarding the process to verify a suspension and debarment search is completed prior to setting up the vendor in the system. Sanford’s preventative and detective controls and operating procedures provide reasonable assurance over the effectiveness of the controls necessary to prevent the risk of federal funds being paid to vendors that are suspended or debarred. Sanford’s preventive and detective controls and operating procedures provide reasonable assurance over the effectiveness of the controls necessary to prevent the risk of federal funds being utilized for items that do not adhere to the procurement standards. Sanford will re-educate applicable parties and enhance its procedural documentation regarding procurement. Sanford will implement a monthly review process of federal funds utilized for procurement.
Identification of the federal program: Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Pass-Through Entities: North Dakota Department of Health, South Dakota Department of Health and Minnesota Department of Health Assistance Listing: 93.155; COVID-19 Rural Health Research Centers Award Numbers: Various Award Year: FY 2021 – 2023 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” The Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.213 states, “Non-federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR Part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities”. In addition, Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.320 (c) states: “There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold; (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate.” Further, Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.320(a)(2) states: Small purchases – “The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity.” Condition: We noted the following matters during our testing of Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements: • A third-party vendor performed the suspension and debarment validation process for Sanford. The third-party vendor does not have a SOC 1 (System and Organization Controls) Report. For a portion of the year, Sanford relied on the suspension and debarment checks performed by the third-party vendor for results concluding no match without completing a validation control to ensure the results provided by the third-party vendor were accurate. • We noted instances where the vendor screening for suspension and debarment was not performed prior to setting up the vendor in the System and procuring the goods/services. Section III—Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) • For certain procurement transactions tested, we noted Sanford did not adhere to the compliance requirements and did not follow its procurement policy by maintaining documentation related to cost/price analysis or sole-source procurement and completing the sole-source justification forms timely. Cause: Sanford utilizes a third-party vendor to perform suspension and debarment checks on its vendors, both during the vendor setup process as well as ongoing monitoring of active vendors. Sanford did not add an additional validation control until August 2023 to ensure that the suspension and debarment checks performed by the third-party vendor aligned with the governmental suspension and debarment database when the search resulted in no match. In addition, Sanford did not follow its procurement policy and perform the vendor screening for suspension and debarment prior to setting up the vendor in the system and transacting with the vendors. Furthermore, Sanford, prior to entering into the procurement transaction, did not complete the sole-source justification forms, or maintain documentation to support the sole-sourced procurements for those procurement transactions that exceeded the small purchase threshold. Effect or potential effect: Sanford’s screening for suspension and debarment through the third-party vendor results may not be accurate for the period January 1, 2023 through July 31, 2023. Further, by not performing the vendor screening for suspension and debarment prior to transacting with the vendor, Sanford could have potentially entered into a business transaction with suspended or debarred parties. Sanford did not comply with the federal procurement requirements and its procurement policy by not maintaining adequate documentation to support the cost/price analysis or sole sourced vendor selections in addition to not timely completing the sole source justification forms. Section III—Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Questioned costs: $307,249 determined as the amount of the procurement expenditures included in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for two procurement transactions that had inadequate documentation to justify sole source selection. Context: To ensure compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.213, Sanford conducts both preventive and detective controls in its vendor setup and monitoring process to ensure new vendors and active vendors are not suspended or debarred. A consistent vendor setup process is followed for each new vendor that Sanford transacts with, regardless of whether the vendor transactions are funded through federal grant funding or through other sources. To prevent a suspended or debarred vendor from being added as a new vendor, the vendor is checked against the suspension and debarment database electronically before completion of the vendor setup. Subsequent to vendor setup, Sanford also monitors the status of its vendors to ensure the vendor’s status has not changed. We selected 25 new vendors to verify that the suspension and debarment screening was performed and performed timely. We noted for 3 of the 25 vendors, the suspension and debarment screening was not performed prior to setting up the vendor in the system and for 1 of these vendors, Sanford had entered into a transaction prior to performing the suspension and debarment screening. We selected 8 procurement transactions that exceeded the small purchase threshold. Of the 8 transactions, 4 transactions did not follow the federal procurement standards and Sanford’s procurement policy which requires sole source documentation be completed prior to procuring the items. Additionally, for 2 of these 4 transactions, Sanford did not have sufficient documentation maintained to support the cost/price analysis performed or justification to support the sole source selection of the vendors. Total federal expenditures subject to suspension and debarment is $2,870,421, and federal expenditures exceeding the micro purchase threshold is $2,298,733. Total federal expenditures under the program, as reported on the SEFA, is $2,870,421. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This finding is a repeat of Finding 2022-001 in the prior year. Recommendation: Management should ensure that the suspension and debarment screening is performed prior to entering into the transaction with the vendor and also ensure that it follows the procurement policy to verify suspension and debarment of the vendor prior to setting up the vendor in the system. In addition, Management should ensure that any sole sourced purchases or when quotes are obtained, that those be documented prior to entering into the procurement transaction. Views of responsible officials: Sanford continues to document periodic validation of the suspension and debarment search results performed by the third-party vendor for vendor searches that yield no suspension and debarment match. Additionally, as part of the periodic validation, Sanford will include a validation to ensure a suspension and debarment search is completed prior to setting the vendor up in the system. Sanford will re-educate appropriate staff regarding the process to verify a suspension and debarment search is completed prior to setting up the vendor in the system. Sanford’s preventative and detective controls and operating procedures provide reasonable assurance over the effectiveness of the controls necessary to prevent the risk of federal funds being paid to vendors that are suspended or debarred. Sanford’s preventive and detective controls and operating procedures provide reasonable assurance over the effectiveness of the controls necessary to prevent the risk of federal funds being utilized for items that do not adhere to the procurement standards. Sanford will re-educate applicable parties and enhance its procedural documentation regarding procurement. Sanford will implement a monthly review process of federal funds utilized for procurement.
Identification of the federal program: Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Pass-Through Entities: North Dakota Department of Health, South Dakota Department of Health and Minnesota Department of Health Assistance Listing: 93.155; COVID-19 Rural Health Research Centers Award Numbers: Various Award Year: FY 2021 – 2023 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” The Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.213 states, “Non-federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR Part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities”. In addition, Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.320 (c) states: “There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold; (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate.” Further, Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.320(a)(2) states: Small purchases – “The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity.” Condition: We noted the following matters during our testing of Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements: • A third-party vendor performed the suspension and debarment validation process for Sanford. The third-party vendor does not have a SOC 1 (System and Organization Controls) Report. For a portion of the year, Sanford relied on the suspension and debarment checks performed by the third-party vendor for results concluding no match without completing a validation control to ensure the results provided by the third-party vendor were accurate. • We noted instances where the vendor screening for suspension and debarment was not performed prior to setting up the vendor in the System and procuring the goods/services. Section III—Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) • For certain procurement transactions tested, we noted Sanford did not adhere to the compliance requirements and did not follow its procurement policy by maintaining documentation related to cost/price analysis or sole-source procurement and completing the sole-source justification forms timely. Cause: Sanford utilizes a third-party vendor to perform suspension and debarment checks on its vendors, both during the vendor setup process as well as ongoing monitoring of active vendors. Sanford did not add an additional validation control until August 2023 to ensure that the suspension and debarment checks performed by the third-party vendor aligned with the governmental suspension and debarment database when the search resulted in no match. In addition, Sanford did not follow its procurement policy and perform the vendor screening for suspension and debarment prior to setting up the vendor in the system and transacting with the vendors. Furthermore, Sanford, prior to entering into the procurement transaction, did not complete the sole-source justification forms, or maintain documentation to support the sole-sourced procurements for those procurement transactions that exceeded the small purchase threshold. Effect or potential effect: Sanford’s screening for suspension and debarment through the third-party vendor results may not be accurate for the period January 1, 2023 through July 31, 2023. Further, by not performing the vendor screening for suspension and debarment prior to transacting with the vendor, Sanford could have potentially entered into a business transaction with suspended or debarred parties. Sanford did not comply with the federal procurement requirements and its procurement policy by not maintaining adequate documentation to support the cost/price analysis or sole sourced vendor selections in addition to not timely completing the sole source justification forms. Section III—Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Questioned costs: $307,249 determined as the amount of the procurement expenditures included in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for two procurement transactions that had inadequate documentation to justify sole source selection. Context: To ensure compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.213, Sanford conducts both preventive and detective controls in its vendor setup and monitoring process to ensure new vendors and active vendors are not suspended or debarred. A consistent vendor setup process is followed for each new vendor that Sanford transacts with, regardless of whether the vendor transactions are funded through federal grant funding or through other sources. To prevent a suspended or debarred vendor from being added as a new vendor, the vendor is checked against the suspension and debarment database electronically before completion of the vendor setup. Subsequent to vendor setup, Sanford also monitors the status of its vendors to ensure the vendor’s status has not changed. We selected 25 new vendors to verify that the suspension and debarment screening was performed and performed timely. We noted for 3 of the 25 vendors, the suspension and debarment screening was not performed prior to setting up the vendor in the system and for 1 of these vendors, Sanford had entered into a transaction prior to performing the suspension and debarment screening. We selected 8 procurement transactions that exceeded the small purchase threshold. Of the 8 transactions, 4 transactions did not follow the federal procurement standards and Sanford’s procurement policy which requires sole source documentation be completed prior to procuring the items. Additionally, for 2 of these 4 transactions, Sanford did not have sufficient documentation maintained to support the cost/price analysis performed or justification to support the sole source selection of the vendors. Total federal expenditures subject to suspension and debarment is $2,870,421, and federal expenditures exceeding the micro purchase threshold is $2,298,733. Total federal expenditures under the program, as reported on the SEFA, is $2,870,421. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This finding is a repeat of Finding 2022-001 in the prior year. Recommendation: Management should ensure that the suspension and debarment screening is performed prior to entering into the transaction with the vendor and also ensure that it follows the procurement policy to verify suspension and debarment of the vendor prior to setting up the vendor in the system. In addition, Management should ensure that any sole sourced purchases or when quotes are obtained, that those be documented prior to entering into the procurement transaction. Views of responsible officials: Sanford continues to document periodic validation of the suspension and debarment search results performed by the third-party vendor for vendor searches that yield no suspension and debarment match. Additionally, as part of the periodic validation, Sanford will include a validation to ensure a suspension and debarment search is completed prior to setting the vendor up in the system. Sanford will re-educate appropriate staff regarding the process to verify a suspension and debarment search is completed prior to setting up the vendor in the system. Sanford’s preventative and detective controls and operating procedures provide reasonable assurance over the effectiveness of the controls necessary to prevent the risk of federal funds being paid to vendors that are suspended or debarred. Sanford’s preventive and detective controls and operating procedures provide reasonable assurance over the effectiveness of the controls necessary to prevent the risk of federal funds being utilized for items that do not adhere to the procurement standards. Sanford will re-educate applicable parties and enhance its procedural documentation regarding procurement. Sanford will implement a monthly review process of federal funds utilized for procurement.
Identification of the federal program: Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Pass-Through Entities: North Dakota Department of Health, South Dakota Department of Health and Minnesota Department of Health Assistance Listing: 93.155; COVID-19 Rural Health Research Centers Award Numbers: Various Award Year: FY 2021 – 2023 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” The Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.213 states, “Non-federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR Part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities”. In addition, Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.320 (c) states: “There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold; (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate.” Further, Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.320(a)(2) states: Small purchases – “The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity.” Condition: We noted the following matters during our testing of Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements: • A third-party vendor performed the suspension and debarment validation process for Sanford. The third-party vendor does not have a SOC 1 (System and Organization Controls) Report. For a portion of the year, Sanford relied on the suspension and debarment checks performed by the third-party vendor for results concluding no match without completing a validation control to ensure the results provided by the third-party vendor were accurate. • We noted instances where the vendor screening for suspension and debarment was not performed prior to setting up the vendor in the System and procuring the goods/services. Section III—Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) • For certain procurement transactions tested, we noted Sanford did not adhere to the compliance requirements and did not follow its procurement policy by maintaining documentation related to cost/price analysis or sole-source procurement and completing the sole-source justification forms timely. Cause: Sanford utilizes a third-party vendor to perform suspension and debarment checks on its vendors, both during the vendor setup process as well as ongoing monitoring of active vendors. Sanford did not add an additional validation control until August 2023 to ensure that the suspension and debarment checks performed by the third-party vendor aligned with the governmental suspension and debarment database when the search resulted in no match. In addition, Sanford did not follow its procurement policy and perform the vendor screening for suspension and debarment prior to setting up the vendor in the system and transacting with the vendors. Furthermore, Sanford, prior to entering into the procurement transaction, did not complete the sole-source justification forms, or maintain documentation to support the sole-sourced procurements for those procurement transactions that exceeded the small purchase threshold. Effect or potential effect: Sanford’s screening for suspension and debarment through the third-party vendor results may not be accurate for the period January 1, 2023 through July 31, 2023. Further, by not performing the vendor screening for suspension and debarment prior to transacting with the vendor, Sanford could have potentially entered into a business transaction with suspended or debarred parties. Sanford did not comply with the federal procurement requirements and its procurement policy by not maintaining adequate documentation to support the cost/price analysis or sole sourced vendor selections in addition to not timely completing the sole source justification forms. Section III—Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Questioned costs: $307,249 determined as the amount of the procurement expenditures included in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for two procurement transactions that had inadequate documentation to justify sole source selection. Context: To ensure compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.213, Sanford conducts both preventive and detective controls in its vendor setup and monitoring process to ensure new vendors and active vendors are not suspended or debarred. A consistent vendor setup process is followed for each new vendor that Sanford transacts with, regardless of whether the vendor transactions are funded through federal grant funding or through other sources. To prevent a suspended or debarred vendor from being added as a new vendor, the vendor is checked against the suspension and debarment database electronically before completion of the vendor setup. Subsequent to vendor setup, Sanford also monitors the status of its vendors to ensure the vendor’s status has not changed. We selected 25 new vendors to verify that the suspension and debarment screening was performed and performed timely. We noted for 3 of the 25 vendors, the suspension and debarment screening was not performed prior to setting up the vendor in the system and for 1 of these vendors, Sanford had entered into a transaction prior to performing the suspension and debarment screening. We selected 8 procurement transactions that exceeded the small purchase threshold. Of the 8 transactions, 4 transactions did not follow the federal procurement standards and Sanford’s procurement policy which requires sole source documentation be completed prior to procuring the items. Additionally, for 2 of these 4 transactions, Sanford did not have sufficient documentation maintained to support the cost/price analysis performed or justification to support the sole source selection of the vendors. Total federal expenditures subject to suspension and debarment is $2,870,421, and federal expenditures exceeding the micro purchase threshold is $2,298,733. Total federal expenditures under the program, as reported on the SEFA, is $2,870,421. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This finding is a repeat of Finding 2022-001 in the prior year. Recommendation: Management should ensure that the suspension and debarment screening is performed prior to entering into the transaction with the vendor and also ensure that it follows the procurement policy to verify suspension and debarment of the vendor prior to setting up the vendor in the system. In addition, Management should ensure that any sole sourced purchases or when quotes are obtained, that those be documented prior to entering into the procurement transaction. Views of responsible officials: Sanford continues to document periodic validation of the suspension and debarment search results performed by the third-party vendor for vendor searches that yield no suspension and debarment match. Additionally, as part of the periodic validation, Sanford will include a validation to ensure a suspension and debarment search is completed prior to setting the vendor up in the system. Sanford will re-educate appropriate staff regarding the process to verify a suspension and debarment search is completed prior to setting up the vendor in the system. Sanford’s preventative and detective controls and operating procedures provide reasonable assurance over the effectiveness of the controls necessary to prevent the risk of federal funds being paid to vendors that are suspended or debarred. Sanford’s preventive and detective controls and operating procedures provide reasonable assurance over the effectiveness of the controls necessary to prevent the risk of federal funds being utilized for items that do not adhere to the procurement standards. Sanford will re-educate applicable parties and enhance its procedural documentation regarding procurement. Sanford will implement a monthly review process of federal funds utilized for procurement.
Identification of the federal program: Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Pass-Through Entities: North Dakota Department of Health, South Dakota Department of Health and Minnesota Department of Health Assistance Listing: 93.155; COVID-19 Rural Health Research Centers Award Numbers: Various Award Year: FY 2021 – 2023 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” The Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.213 states, “Non-federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR Part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities”. In addition, Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.320 (c) states: “There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold; (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate.” Further, Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.320(a)(2) states: Small purchases – “The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity.” Condition: We noted the following matters during our testing of Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements: • A third-party vendor performed the suspension and debarment validation process for Sanford. The third-party vendor does not have a SOC 1 (System and Organization Controls) Report. For a portion of the year, Sanford relied on the suspension and debarment checks performed by the third-party vendor for results concluding no match without completing a validation control to ensure the results provided by the third-party vendor were accurate. • We noted instances where the vendor screening for suspension and debarment was not performed prior to setting up the vendor in the System and procuring the goods/services. Section III—Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) • For certain procurement transactions tested, we noted Sanford did not adhere to the compliance requirements and did not follow its procurement policy by maintaining documentation related to cost/price analysis or sole-source procurement and completing the sole-source justification forms timely. Cause: Sanford utilizes a third-party vendor to perform suspension and debarment checks on its vendors, both during the vendor setup process as well as ongoing monitoring of active vendors. Sanford did not add an additional validation control until August 2023 to ensure that the suspension and debarment checks performed by the third-party vendor aligned with the governmental suspension and debarment database when the search resulted in no match. In addition, Sanford did not follow its procurement policy and perform the vendor screening for suspension and debarment prior to setting up the vendor in the system and transacting with the vendors. Furthermore, Sanford, prior to entering into the procurement transaction, did not complete the sole-source justification forms, or maintain documentation to support the sole-sourced procurements for those procurement transactions that exceeded the small purchase threshold. Effect or potential effect: Sanford’s screening for suspension and debarment through the third-party vendor results may not be accurate for the period January 1, 2023 through July 31, 2023. Further, by not performing the vendor screening for suspension and debarment prior to transacting with the vendor, Sanford could have potentially entered into a business transaction with suspended or debarred parties. Sanford did not comply with the federal procurement requirements and its procurement policy by not maintaining adequate documentation to support the cost/price analysis or sole sourced vendor selections in addition to not timely completing the sole source justification forms. Section III—Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Questioned costs: $307,249 determined as the amount of the procurement expenditures included in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for two procurement transactions that had inadequate documentation to justify sole source selection. Context: To ensure compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.213, Sanford conducts both preventive and detective controls in its vendor setup and monitoring process to ensure new vendors and active vendors are not suspended or debarred. A consistent vendor setup process is followed for each new vendor that Sanford transacts with, regardless of whether the vendor transactions are funded through federal grant funding or through other sources. To prevent a suspended or debarred vendor from being added as a new vendor, the vendor is checked against the suspension and debarment database electronically before completion of the vendor setup. Subsequent to vendor setup, Sanford also monitors the status of its vendors to ensure the vendor’s status has not changed. We selected 25 new vendors to verify that the suspension and debarment screening was performed and performed timely. We noted for 3 of the 25 vendors, the suspension and debarment screening was not performed prior to setting up the vendor in the system and for 1 of these vendors, Sanford had entered into a transaction prior to performing the suspension and debarment screening. We selected 8 procurement transactions that exceeded the small purchase threshold. Of the 8 transactions, 4 transactions did not follow the federal procurement standards and Sanford’s procurement policy which requires sole source documentation be completed prior to procuring the items. Additionally, for 2 of these 4 transactions, Sanford did not have sufficient documentation maintained to support the cost/price analysis performed or justification to support the sole source selection of the vendors. Total federal expenditures subject to suspension and debarment is $2,870,421, and federal expenditures exceeding the micro purchase threshold is $2,298,733. Total federal expenditures under the program, as reported on the SEFA, is $2,870,421. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This finding is a repeat of Finding 2022-001 in the prior year. Recommendation: Management should ensure that the suspension and debarment screening is performed prior to entering into the transaction with the vendor and also ensure that it follows the procurement policy to verify suspension and debarment of the vendor prior to setting up the vendor in the system. In addition, Management should ensure that any sole sourced purchases or when quotes are obtained, that those be documented prior to entering into the procurement transaction. Views of responsible officials: Sanford continues to document periodic validation of the suspension and debarment search results performed by the third-party vendor for vendor searches that yield no suspension and debarment match. Additionally, as part of the periodic validation, Sanford will include a validation to ensure a suspension and debarment search is completed prior to setting the vendor up in the system. Sanford will re-educate appropriate staff regarding the process to verify a suspension and debarment search is completed prior to setting up the vendor in the system. Sanford’s preventative and detective controls and operating procedures provide reasonable assurance over the effectiveness of the controls necessary to prevent the risk of federal funds being paid to vendors that are suspended or debarred. Sanford’s preventive and detective controls and operating procedures provide reasonable assurance over the effectiveness of the controls necessary to prevent the risk of federal funds being utilized for items that do not adhere to the procurement standards. Sanford will re-educate applicable parties and enhance its procedural documentation regarding procurement. Sanford will implement a monthly review process of federal funds utilized for procurement.
Identification of the federal program: Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Pass-Through Entities: North Dakota Department of Health, South Dakota Department of Health and Minnesota Department of Health Assistance Listing: 93.155; COVID-19 Rural Health Research Centers Award Numbers: Various Award Year: FY 2021 – 2023 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” The Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.213 states, “Non-federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR Part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities”. In addition, Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.320 (c) states: “There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold; (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate.” Further, Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.320(a)(2) states: Small purchases – “The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity.” Condition: We noted the following matters during our testing of Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements: • A third-party vendor performed the suspension and debarment validation process for Sanford. The third-party vendor does not have a SOC 1 (System and Organization Controls) Report. For a portion of the year, Sanford relied on the suspension and debarment checks performed by the third-party vendor for results concluding no match without completing a validation control to ensure the results provided by the third-party vendor were accurate. • We noted instances where the vendor screening for suspension and debarment was not performed prior to setting up the vendor in the System and procuring the goods/services. Section III—Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) • For certain procurement transactions tested, we noted Sanford did not adhere to the compliance requirements and did not follow its procurement policy by maintaining documentation related to cost/price analysis or sole-source procurement and completing the sole-source justification forms timely. Cause: Sanford utilizes a third-party vendor to perform suspension and debarment checks on its vendors, both during the vendor setup process as well as ongoing monitoring of active vendors. Sanford did not add an additional validation control until August 2023 to ensure that the suspension and debarment checks performed by the third-party vendor aligned with the governmental suspension and debarment database when the search resulted in no match. In addition, Sanford did not follow its procurement policy and perform the vendor screening for suspension and debarment prior to setting up the vendor in the system and transacting with the vendors. Furthermore, Sanford, prior to entering into the procurement transaction, did not complete the sole-source justification forms, or maintain documentation to support the sole-sourced procurements for those procurement transactions that exceeded the small purchase threshold. Effect or potential effect: Sanford’s screening for suspension and debarment through the third-party vendor results may not be accurate for the period January 1, 2023 through July 31, 2023. Further, by not performing the vendor screening for suspension and debarment prior to transacting with the vendor, Sanford could have potentially entered into a business transaction with suspended or debarred parties. Sanford did not comply with the federal procurement requirements and its procurement policy by not maintaining adequate documentation to support the cost/price analysis or sole sourced vendor selections in addition to not timely completing the sole source justification forms. Section III—Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Questioned costs: $307,249 determined as the amount of the procurement expenditures included in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for two procurement transactions that had inadequate documentation to justify sole source selection. Context: To ensure compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.213, Sanford conducts both preventive and detective controls in its vendor setup and monitoring process to ensure new vendors and active vendors are not suspended or debarred. A consistent vendor setup process is followed for each new vendor that Sanford transacts with, regardless of whether the vendor transactions are funded through federal grant funding or through other sources. To prevent a suspended or debarred vendor from being added as a new vendor, the vendor is checked against the suspension and debarment database electronically before completion of the vendor setup. Subsequent to vendor setup, Sanford also monitors the status of its vendors to ensure the vendor’s status has not changed. We selected 25 new vendors to verify that the suspension and debarment screening was performed and performed timely. We noted for 3 of the 25 vendors, the suspension and debarment screening was not performed prior to setting up the vendor in the system and for 1 of these vendors, Sanford had entered into a transaction prior to performing the suspension and debarment screening. We selected 8 procurement transactions that exceeded the small purchase threshold. Of the 8 transactions, 4 transactions did not follow the federal procurement standards and Sanford’s procurement policy which requires sole source documentation be completed prior to procuring the items. Additionally, for 2 of these 4 transactions, Sanford did not have sufficient documentation maintained to support the cost/price analysis performed or justification to support the sole source selection of the vendors. Total federal expenditures subject to suspension and debarment is $2,870,421, and federal expenditures exceeding the micro purchase threshold is $2,298,733. Total federal expenditures under the program, as reported on the SEFA, is $2,870,421. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This finding is a repeat of Finding 2022-001 in the prior year. Recommendation: Management should ensure that the suspension and debarment screening is performed prior to entering into the transaction with the vendor and also ensure that it follows the procurement policy to verify suspension and debarment of the vendor prior to setting up the vendor in the system. In addition, Management should ensure that any sole sourced purchases or when quotes are obtained, that those be documented prior to entering into the procurement transaction. Views of responsible officials: Sanford continues to document periodic validation of the suspension and debarment search results performed by the third-party vendor for vendor searches that yield no suspension and debarment match. Additionally, as part of the periodic validation, Sanford will include a validation to ensure a suspension and debarment search is completed prior to setting the vendor up in the system. Sanford will re-educate appropriate staff regarding the process to verify a suspension and debarment search is completed prior to setting up the vendor in the system. Sanford’s preventative and detective controls and operating procedures provide reasonable assurance over the effectiveness of the controls necessary to prevent the risk of federal funds being paid to vendors that are suspended or debarred. Sanford’s preventive and detective controls and operating procedures provide reasonable assurance over the effectiveness of the controls necessary to prevent the risk of federal funds being utilized for items that do not adhere to the procurement standards. Sanford will re-educate applicable parties and enhance its procedural documentation regarding procurement. Sanford will implement a monthly review process of federal funds utilized for procurement.
Identification of the federal program: Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Pass-Through Entities: North Dakota Department of Health, South Dakota Department of Health and Minnesota Department of Health Assistance Listing: 93.155; COVID-19 Rural Health Research Centers Award Numbers: Various Award Year: FY 2021 – 2023 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” The Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.213 states, “Non-federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR Part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities”. In addition, Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.320 (c) states: “There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold; (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate.” Further, Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.320(a)(2) states: Small purchases – “The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity.” Condition: We noted the following matters during our testing of Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements: • A third-party vendor performed the suspension and debarment validation process for Sanford. The third-party vendor does not have a SOC 1 (System and Organization Controls) Report. For a portion of the year, Sanford relied on the suspension and debarment checks performed by the third-party vendor for results concluding no match without completing a validation control to ensure the results provided by the third-party vendor were accurate. • We noted instances where the vendor screening for suspension and debarment was not performed prior to setting up the vendor in the System and procuring the goods/services. Section III—Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) • For certain procurement transactions tested, we noted Sanford did not adhere to the compliance requirements and did not follow its procurement policy by maintaining documentation related to cost/price analysis or sole-source procurement and completing the sole-source justification forms timely. Cause: Sanford utilizes a third-party vendor to perform suspension and debarment checks on its vendors, both during the vendor setup process as well as ongoing monitoring of active vendors. Sanford did not add an additional validation control until August 2023 to ensure that the suspension and debarment checks performed by the third-party vendor aligned with the governmental suspension and debarment database when the search resulted in no match. In addition, Sanford did not follow its procurement policy and perform the vendor screening for suspension and debarment prior to setting up the vendor in the system and transacting with the vendors. Furthermore, Sanford, prior to entering into the procurement transaction, did not complete the sole-source justification forms, or maintain documentation to support the sole-sourced procurements for those procurement transactions that exceeded the small purchase threshold. Effect or potential effect: Sanford’s screening for suspension and debarment through the third-party vendor results may not be accurate for the period January 1, 2023 through July 31, 2023. Further, by not performing the vendor screening for suspension and debarment prior to transacting with the vendor, Sanford could have potentially entered into a business transaction with suspended or debarred parties. Sanford did not comply with the federal procurement requirements and its procurement policy by not maintaining adequate documentation to support the cost/price analysis or sole sourced vendor selections in addition to not timely completing the sole source justification forms. Section III—Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Questioned costs: $307,249 determined as the amount of the procurement expenditures included in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for two procurement transactions that had inadequate documentation to justify sole source selection. Context: To ensure compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.213, Sanford conducts both preventive and detective controls in its vendor setup and monitoring process to ensure new vendors and active vendors are not suspended or debarred. A consistent vendor setup process is followed for each new vendor that Sanford transacts with, regardless of whether the vendor transactions are funded through federal grant funding or through other sources. To prevent a suspended or debarred vendor from being added as a new vendor, the vendor is checked against the suspension and debarment database electronically before completion of the vendor setup. Subsequent to vendor setup, Sanford also monitors the status of its vendors to ensure the vendor’s status has not changed. We selected 25 new vendors to verify that the suspension and debarment screening was performed and performed timely. We noted for 3 of the 25 vendors, the suspension and debarment screening was not performed prior to setting up the vendor in the system and for 1 of these vendors, Sanford had entered into a transaction prior to performing the suspension and debarment screening. We selected 8 procurement transactions that exceeded the small purchase threshold. Of the 8 transactions, 4 transactions did not follow the federal procurement standards and Sanford’s procurement policy which requires sole source documentation be completed prior to procuring the items. Additionally, for 2 of these 4 transactions, Sanford did not have sufficient documentation maintained to support the cost/price analysis performed or justification to support the sole source selection of the vendors. Total federal expenditures subject to suspension and debarment is $2,870,421, and federal expenditures exceeding the micro purchase threshold is $2,298,733. Total federal expenditures under the program, as reported on the SEFA, is $2,870,421. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This finding is a repeat of Finding 2022-001 in the prior year. Recommendation: Management should ensure that the suspension and debarment screening is performed prior to entering into the transaction with the vendor and also ensure that it follows the procurement policy to verify suspension and debarment of the vendor prior to setting up the vendor in the system. In addition, Management should ensure that any sole sourced purchases or when quotes are obtained, that those be documented prior to entering into the procurement transaction. Views of responsible officials: Sanford continues to document periodic validation of the suspension and debarment search results performed by the third-party vendor for vendor searches that yield no suspension and debarment match. Additionally, as part of the periodic validation, Sanford will include a validation to ensure a suspension and debarment search is completed prior to setting the vendor up in the system. Sanford will re-educate appropriate staff regarding the process to verify a suspension and debarment search is completed prior to setting up the vendor in the system. Sanford’s preventative and detective controls and operating procedures provide reasonable assurance over the effectiveness of the controls necessary to prevent the risk of federal funds being paid to vendors that are suspended or debarred. Sanford’s preventive and detective controls and operating procedures provide reasonable assurance over the effectiveness of the controls necessary to prevent the risk of federal funds being utilized for items that do not adhere to the procurement standards. Sanford will re-educate applicable parties and enhance its procedural documentation regarding procurement. Sanford will implement a monthly review process of federal funds utilized for procurement.
Identification of the federal program: Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Pass-Through Entities: North Dakota Department of Health, South Dakota Department of Health and Minnesota Department of Health Assistance Listing: 93.155; COVID-19 Rural Health Research Centers Award Numbers: Various Award Year: FY 2021 – 2023 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” The Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.213 states, “Non-federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR Part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities”. In addition, Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.320 (c) states: “There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold; (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate.” Further, Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.320(a)(2) states: Small purchases – “The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity.” Condition: We noted the following matters during our testing of Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements: • A third-party vendor performed the suspension and debarment validation process for Sanford. The third-party vendor does not have a SOC 1 (System and Organization Controls) Report. For a portion of the year, Sanford relied on the suspension and debarment checks performed by the third-party vendor for results concluding no match without completing a validation control to ensure the results provided by the third-party vendor were accurate. • We noted instances where the vendor screening for suspension and debarment was not performed prior to setting up the vendor in the System and procuring the goods/services. Section III—Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) • For certain procurement transactions tested, we noted Sanford did not adhere to the compliance requirements and did not follow its procurement policy by maintaining documentation related to cost/price analysis or sole-source procurement and completing the sole-source justification forms timely. Cause: Sanford utilizes a third-party vendor to perform suspension and debarment checks on its vendors, both during the vendor setup process as well as ongoing monitoring of active vendors. Sanford did not add an additional validation control until August 2023 to ensure that the suspension and debarment checks performed by the third-party vendor aligned with the governmental suspension and debarment database when the search resulted in no match. In addition, Sanford did not follow its procurement policy and perform the vendor screening for suspension and debarment prior to setting up the vendor in the system and transacting with the vendors. Furthermore, Sanford, prior to entering into the procurement transaction, did not complete the sole-source justification forms, or maintain documentation to support the sole-sourced procurements for those procurement transactions that exceeded the small purchase threshold. Effect or potential effect: Sanford’s screening for suspension and debarment through the third-party vendor results may not be accurate for the period January 1, 2023 through July 31, 2023. Further, by not performing the vendor screening for suspension and debarment prior to transacting with the vendor, Sanford could have potentially entered into a business transaction with suspended or debarred parties. Sanford did not comply with the federal procurement requirements and its procurement policy by not maintaining adequate documentation to support the cost/price analysis or sole sourced vendor selections in addition to not timely completing the sole source justification forms. Section III—Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Questioned costs: $307,249 determined as the amount of the procurement expenditures included in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for two procurement transactions that had inadequate documentation to justify sole source selection. Context: To ensure compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.213, Sanford conducts both preventive and detective controls in its vendor setup and monitoring process to ensure new vendors and active vendors are not suspended or debarred. A consistent vendor setup process is followed for each new vendor that Sanford transacts with, regardless of whether the vendor transactions are funded through federal grant funding or through other sources. To prevent a suspended or debarred vendor from being added as a new vendor, the vendor is checked against the suspension and debarment database electronically before completion of the vendor setup. Subsequent to vendor setup, Sanford also monitors the status of its vendors to ensure the vendor’s status has not changed. We selected 25 new vendors to verify that the suspension and debarment screening was performed and performed timely. We noted for 3 of the 25 vendors, the suspension and debarment screening was not performed prior to setting up the vendor in the system and for 1 of these vendors, Sanford had entered into a transaction prior to performing the suspension and debarment screening. We selected 8 procurement transactions that exceeded the small purchase threshold. Of the 8 transactions, 4 transactions did not follow the federal procurement standards and Sanford’s procurement policy which requires sole source documentation be completed prior to procuring the items. Additionally, for 2 of these 4 transactions, Sanford did not have sufficient documentation maintained to support the cost/price analysis performed or justification to support the sole source selection of the vendors. Total federal expenditures subject to suspension and debarment is $2,870,421, and federal expenditures exceeding the micro purchase threshold is $2,298,733. Total federal expenditures under the program, as reported on the SEFA, is $2,870,421. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This finding is a repeat of Finding 2022-001 in the prior year. Recommendation: Management should ensure that the suspension and debarment screening is performed prior to entering into the transaction with the vendor and also ensure that it follows the procurement policy to verify suspension and debarment of the vendor prior to setting up the vendor in the system. In addition, Management should ensure that any sole sourced purchases or when quotes are obtained, that those be documented prior to entering into the procurement transaction. Views of responsible officials: Sanford continues to document periodic validation of the suspension and debarment search results performed by the third-party vendor for vendor searches that yield no suspension and debarment match. Additionally, as part of the periodic validation, Sanford will include a validation to ensure a suspension and debarment search is completed prior to setting the vendor up in the system. Sanford will re-educate appropriate staff regarding the process to verify a suspension and debarment search is completed prior to setting up the vendor in the system. Sanford’s preventative and detective controls and operating procedures provide reasonable assurance over the effectiveness of the controls necessary to prevent the risk of federal funds being paid to vendors that are suspended or debarred. Sanford’s preventive and detective controls and operating procedures provide reasonable assurance over the effectiveness of the controls necessary to prevent the risk of federal funds being utilized for items that do not adhere to the procurement standards. Sanford will re-educate applicable parties and enhance its procedural documentation regarding procurement. Sanford will implement a monthly review process of federal funds utilized for procurement.
Identification of the federal program: Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Pass-Through Entities: North Dakota Department of Health, South Dakota Department of Health and Minnesota Department of Health Assistance Listing: 93.155; COVID-19 Rural Health Research Centers Award Numbers: Various Award Year: FY 2021 – 2023 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” The Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.213 states, “Non-federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR Part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities”. In addition, Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.320 (c) states: “There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold; (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate.” Further, Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.320(a)(2) states: Small purchases – “The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity.” Condition: We noted the following matters during our testing of Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements: • A third-party vendor performed the suspension and debarment validation process for Sanford. The third-party vendor does not have a SOC 1 (System and Organization Controls) Report. For a portion of the year, Sanford relied on the suspension and debarment checks performed by the third-party vendor for results concluding no match without completing a validation control to ensure the results provided by the third-party vendor were accurate. • We noted instances where the vendor screening for suspension and debarment was not performed prior to setting up the vendor in the System and procuring the goods/services. Section III—Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) • For certain procurement transactions tested, we noted Sanford did not adhere to the compliance requirements and did not follow its procurement policy by maintaining documentation related to cost/price analysis or sole-source procurement and completing the sole-source justification forms timely. Cause: Sanford utilizes a third-party vendor to perform suspension and debarment checks on its vendors, both during the vendor setup process as well as ongoing monitoring of active vendors. Sanford did not add an additional validation control until August 2023 to ensure that the suspension and debarment checks performed by the third-party vendor aligned with the governmental suspension and debarment database when the search resulted in no match. In addition, Sanford did not follow its procurement policy and perform the vendor screening for suspension and debarment prior to setting up the vendor in the system and transacting with the vendors. Furthermore, Sanford, prior to entering into the procurement transaction, did not complete the sole-source justification forms, or maintain documentation to support the sole-sourced procurements for those procurement transactions that exceeded the small purchase threshold. Effect or potential effect: Sanford’s screening for suspension and debarment through the third-party vendor results may not be accurate for the period January 1, 2023 through July 31, 2023. Further, by not performing the vendor screening for suspension and debarment prior to transacting with the vendor, Sanford could have potentially entered into a business transaction with suspended or debarred parties. Sanford did not comply with the federal procurement requirements and its procurement policy by not maintaining adequate documentation to support the cost/price analysis or sole sourced vendor selections in addition to not timely completing the sole source justification forms. Section III—Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Questioned costs: $307,249 determined as the amount of the procurement expenditures included in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for two procurement transactions that had inadequate documentation to justify sole source selection. Context: To ensure compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.213, Sanford conducts both preventive and detective controls in its vendor setup and monitoring process to ensure new vendors and active vendors are not suspended or debarred. A consistent vendor setup process is followed for each new vendor that Sanford transacts with, regardless of whether the vendor transactions are funded through federal grant funding or through other sources. To prevent a suspended or debarred vendor from being added as a new vendor, the vendor is checked against the suspension and debarment database electronically before completion of the vendor setup. Subsequent to vendor setup, Sanford also monitors the status of its vendors to ensure the vendor’s status has not changed. We selected 25 new vendors to verify that the suspension and debarment screening was performed and performed timely. We noted for 3 of the 25 vendors, the suspension and debarment screening was not performed prior to setting up the vendor in the system and for 1 of these vendors, Sanford had entered into a transaction prior to performing the suspension and debarment screening. We selected 8 procurement transactions that exceeded the small purchase threshold. Of the 8 transactions, 4 transactions did not follow the federal procurement standards and Sanford’s procurement policy which requires sole source documentation be completed prior to procuring the items. Additionally, for 2 of these 4 transactions, Sanford did not have sufficient documentation maintained to support the cost/price analysis performed or justification to support the sole source selection of the vendors. Total federal expenditures subject to suspension and debarment is $2,870,421, and federal expenditures exceeding the micro purchase threshold is $2,298,733. Total federal expenditures under the program, as reported on the SEFA, is $2,870,421. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This finding is a repeat of Finding 2022-001 in the prior year. Recommendation: Management should ensure that the suspension and debarment screening is performed prior to entering into the transaction with the vendor and also ensure that it follows the procurement policy to verify suspension and debarment of the vendor prior to setting up the vendor in the system. In addition, Management should ensure that any sole sourced purchases or when quotes are obtained, that those be documented prior to entering into the procurement transaction. Views of responsible officials: Sanford continues to document periodic validation of the suspension and debarment search results performed by the third-party vendor for vendor searches that yield no suspension and debarment match. Additionally, as part of the periodic validation, Sanford will include a validation to ensure a suspension and debarment search is completed prior to setting the vendor up in the system. Sanford will re-educate appropriate staff regarding the process to verify a suspension and debarment search is completed prior to setting up the vendor in the system. Sanford’s preventative and detective controls and operating procedures provide reasonable assurance over the effectiveness of the controls necessary to prevent the risk of federal funds being paid to vendors that are suspended or debarred. Sanford’s preventive and detective controls and operating procedures provide reasonable assurance over the effectiveness of the controls necessary to prevent the risk of federal funds being utilized for items that do not adhere to the procurement standards. Sanford will re-educate applicable parties and enhance its procedural documentation regarding procurement. Sanford will implement a monthly review process of federal funds utilized for procurement.
Identification of the federal program: Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Pass-Through Entities: North Dakota Department of Health, South Dakota Department of Health and Minnesota Department of Health Assistance Listing: 93.155; COVID-19 Rural Health Research Centers Award Numbers: Various Award Year: FY 2021 – 2023 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” The Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.213 states, “Non-federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR Part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities”. In addition, Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.320 (c) states: “There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold; (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate.” Further, Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.320(a)(2) states: Small purchases – “The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity.” Condition: We noted the following matters during our testing of Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements: • A third-party vendor performed the suspension and debarment validation process for Sanford. The third-party vendor does not have a SOC 1 (System and Organization Controls) Report. For a portion of the year, Sanford relied on the suspension and debarment checks performed by the third-party vendor for results concluding no match without completing a validation control to ensure the results provided by the third-party vendor were accurate. • We noted instances where the vendor screening for suspension and debarment was not performed prior to setting up the vendor in the System and procuring the goods/services. Section III—Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) • For certain procurement transactions tested, we noted Sanford did not adhere to the compliance requirements and did not follow its procurement policy by maintaining documentation related to cost/price analysis or sole-source procurement and completing the sole-source justification forms timely. Cause: Sanford utilizes a third-party vendor to perform suspension and debarment checks on its vendors, both during the vendor setup process as well as ongoing monitoring of active vendors. Sanford did not add an additional validation control until August 2023 to ensure that the suspension and debarment checks performed by the third-party vendor aligned with the governmental suspension and debarment database when the search resulted in no match. In addition, Sanford did not follow its procurement policy and perform the vendor screening for suspension and debarment prior to setting up the vendor in the system and transacting with the vendors. Furthermore, Sanford, prior to entering into the procurement transaction, did not complete the sole-source justification forms, or maintain documentation to support the sole-sourced procurements for those procurement transactions that exceeded the small purchase threshold. Effect or potential effect: Sanford’s screening for suspension and debarment through the third-party vendor results may not be accurate for the period January 1, 2023 through July 31, 2023. Further, by not performing the vendor screening for suspension and debarment prior to transacting with the vendor, Sanford could have potentially entered into a business transaction with suspended or debarred parties. Sanford did not comply with the federal procurement requirements and its procurement policy by not maintaining adequate documentation to support the cost/price analysis or sole sourced vendor selections in addition to not timely completing the sole source justification forms. Section III—Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Questioned costs: $307,249 determined as the amount of the procurement expenditures included in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for two procurement transactions that had inadequate documentation to justify sole source selection. Context: To ensure compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.213, Sanford conducts both preventive and detective controls in its vendor setup and monitoring process to ensure new vendors and active vendors are not suspended or debarred. A consistent vendor setup process is followed for each new vendor that Sanford transacts with, regardless of whether the vendor transactions are funded through federal grant funding or through other sources. To prevent a suspended or debarred vendor from being added as a new vendor, the vendor is checked against the suspension and debarment database electronically before completion of the vendor setup. Subsequent to vendor setup, Sanford also monitors the status of its vendors to ensure the vendor’s status has not changed. We selected 25 new vendors to verify that the suspension and debarment screening was performed and performed timely. We noted for 3 of the 25 vendors, the suspension and debarment screening was not performed prior to setting up the vendor in the system and for 1 of these vendors, Sanford had entered into a transaction prior to performing the suspension and debarment screening. We selected 8 procurement transactions that exceeded the small purchase threshold. Of the 8 transactions, 4 transactions did not follow the federal procurement standards and Sanford’s procurement policy which requires sole source documentation be completed prior to procuring the items. Additionally, for 2 of these 4 transactions, Sanford did not have sufficient documentation maintained to support the cost/price analysis performed or justification to support the sole source selection of the vendors. Total federal expenditures subject to suspension and debarment is $2,870,421, and federal expenditures exceeding the micro purchase threshold is $2,298,733. Total federal expenditures under the program, as reported on the SEFA, is $2,870,421. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This finding is a repeat of Finding 2022-001 in the prior year. Recommendation: Management should ensure that the suspension and debarment screening is performed prior to entering into the transaction with the vendor and also ensure that it follows the procurement policy to verify suspension and debarment of the vendor prior to setting up the vendor in the system. In addition, Management should ensure that any sole sourced purchases or when quotes are obtained, that those be documented prior to entering into the procurement transaction. Views of responsible officials: Sanford continues to document periodic validation of the suspension and debarment search results performed by the third-party vendor for vendor searches that yield no suspension and debarment match. Additionally, as part of the periodic validation, Sanford will include a validation to ensure a suspension and debarment search is completed prior to setting the vendor up in the system. Sanford will re-educate appropriate staff regarding the process to verify a suspension and debarment search is completed prior to setting up the vendor in the system. Sanford’s preventative and detective controls and operating procedures provide reasonable assurance over the effectiveness of the controls necessary to prevent the risk of federal funds being paid to vendors that are suspended or debarred. Sanford’s preventive and detective controls and operating procedures provide reasonable assurance over the effectiveness of the controls necessary to prevent the risk of federal funds being utilized for items that do not adhere to the procurement standards. Sanford will re-educate applicable parties and enhance its procedural documentation regarding procurement. Sanford will implement a monthly review process of federal funds utilized for procurement.
Identification of the federal program: Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Pass-Through Entities: North Dakota Department of Health, South Dakota Department of Health and Minnesota Department of Health Assistance Listing: 93.155; COVID-19 Rural Health Research Centers Award Numbers: Various Award Year: FY 2021 – 2023 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” The Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.213 states, “Non-federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR Part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities”. In addition, Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.320 (c) states: “There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold; (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate.” Further, Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.320(a)(2) states: Small purchases – “The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity.” Condition: We noted the following matters during our testing of Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements: • A third-party vendor performed the suspension and debarment validation process for Sanford. The third-party vendor does not have a SOC 1 (System and Organization Controls) Report. For a portion of the year, Sanford relied on the suspension and debarment checks performed by the third-party vendor for results concluding no match without completing a validation control to ensure the results provided by the third-party vendor were accurate. • We noted instances where the vendor screening for suspension and debarment was not performed prior to setting up the vendor in the System and procuring the goods/services. Section III—Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) • For certain procurement transactions tested, we noted Sanford did not adhere to the compliance requirements and did not follow its procurement policy by maintaining documentation related to cost/price analysis or sole-source procurement and completing the sole-source justification forms timely. Cause: Sanford utilizes a third-party vendor to perform suspension and debarment checks on its vendors, both during the vendor setup process as well as ongoing monitoring of active vendors. Sanford did not add an additional validation control until August 2023 to ensure that the suspension and debarment checks performed by the third-party vendor aligned with the governmental suspension and debarment database when the search resulted in no match. In addition, Sanford did not follow its procurement policy and perform the vendor screening for suspension and debarment prior to setting up the vendor in the system and transacting with the vendors. Furthermore, Sanford, prior to entering into the procurement transaction, did not complete the sole-source justification forms, or maintain documentation to support the sole-sourced procurements for those procurement transactions that exceeded the small purchase threshold. Effect or potential effect: Sanford’s screening for suspension and debarment through the third-party vendor results may not be accurate for the period January 1, 2023 through July 31, 2023. Further, by not performing the vendor screening for suspension and debarment prior to transacting with the vendor, Sanford could have potentially entered into a business transaction with suspended or debarred parties. Sanford did not comply with the federal procurement requirements and its procurement policy by not maintaining adequate documentation to support the cost/price analysis or sole sourced vendor selections in addition to not timely completing the sole source justification forms. Section III—Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Questioned costs: $307,249 determined as the amount of the procurement expenditures included in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for two procurement transactions that had inadequate documentation to justify sole source selection. Context: To ensure compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.213, Sanford conducts both preventive and detective controls in its vendor setup and monitoring process to ensure new vendors and active vendors are not suspended or debarred. A consistent vendor setup process is followed for each new vendor that Sanford transacts with, regardless of whether the vendor transactions are funded through federal grant funding or through other sources. To prevent a suspended or debarred vendor from being added as a new vendor, the vendor is checked against the suspension and debarment database electronically before completion of the vendor setup. Subsequent to vendor setup, Sanford also monitors the status of its vendors to ensure the vendor’s status has not changed. We selected 25 new vendors to verify that the suspension and debarment screening was performed and performed timely. We noted for 3 of the 25 vendors, the suspension and debarment screening was not performed prior to setting up the vendor in the system and for 1 of these vendors, Sanford had entered into a transaction prior to performing the suspension and debarment screening. We selected 8 procurement transactions that exceeded the small purchase threshold. Of the 8 transactions, 4 transactions did not follow the federal procurement standards and Sanford’s procurement policy which requires sole source documentation be completed prior to procuring the items. Additionally, for 2 of these 4 transactions, Sanford did not have sufficient documentation maintained to support the cost/price analysis performed or justification to support the sole source selection of the vendors. Total federal expenditures subject to suspension and debarment is $2,870,421, and federal expenditures exceeding the micro purchase threshold is $2,298,733. Total federal expenditures under the program, as reported on the SEFA, is $2,870,421. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This finding is a repeat of Finding 2022-001 in the prior year. Recommendation: Management should ensure that the suspension and debarment screening is performed prior to entering into the transaction with the vendor and also ensure that it follows the procurement policy to verify suspension and debarment of the vendor prior to setting up the vendor in the system. In addition, Management should ensure that any sole sourced purchases or when quotes are obtained, that those be documented prior to entering into the procurement transaction. Views of responsible officials: Sanford continues to document periodic validation of the suspension and debarment search results performed by the third-party vendor for vendor searches that yield no suspension and debarment match. Additionally, as part of the periodic validation, Sanford will include a validation to ensure a suspension and debarment search is completed prior to setting the vendor up in the system. Sanford will re-educate appropriate staff regarding the process to verify a suspension and debarment search is completed prior to setting up the vendor in the system. Sanford’s preventative and detective controls and operating procedures provide reasonable assurance over the effectiveness of the controls necessary to prevent the risk of federal funds being paid to vendors that are suspended or debarred. Sanford’s preventive and detective controls and operating procedures provide reasonable assurance over the effectiveness of the controls necessary to prevent the risk of federal funds being utilized for items that do not adhere to the procurement standards. Sanford will re-educate applicable parties and enhance its procedural documentation regarding procurement. Sanford will implement a monthly review process of federal funds utilized for procurement.
Identification of the federal program: Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Pass-Through Entities: North Dakota Department of Health, South Dakota Department of Health and Minnesota Department of Health Assistance Listing: 93.155; COVID-19 Rural Health Research Centers Award Numbers: Various Award Year: FY 2021 – 2023 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” The Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.213 states, “Non-federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR Part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities”. In addition, Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.320 (c) states: “There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold; (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate.” Further, Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.320(a)(2) states: Small purchases – “The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity.” Condition: We noted the following matters during our testing of Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements: • A third-party vendor performed the suspension and debarment validation process for Sanford. The third-party vendor does not have a SOC 1 (System and Organization Controls) Report. For a portion of the year, Sanford relied on the suspension and debarment checks performed by the third-party vendor for results concluding no match without completing a validation control to ensure the results provided by the third-party vendor were accurate. • We noted instances where the vendor screening for suspension and debarment was not performed prior to setting up the vendor in the System and procuring the goods/services. Section III—Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) • For certain procurement transactions tested, we noted Sanford did not adhere to the compliance requirements and did not follow its procurement policy by maintaining documentation related to cost/price analysis or sole-source procurement and completing the sole-source justification forms timely. Cause: Sanford utilizes a third-party vendor to perform suspension and debarment checks on its vendors, both during the vendor setup process as well as ongoing monitoring of active vendors. Sanford did not add an additional validation control until August 2023 to ensure that the suspension and debarment checks performed by the third-party vendor aligned with the governmental suspension and debarment database when the search resulted in no match. In addition, Sanford did not follow its procurement policy and perform the vendor screening for suspension and debarment prior to setting up the vendor in the system and transacting with the vendors. Furthermore, Sanford, prior to entering into the procurement transaction, did not complete the sole-source justification forms, or maintain documentation to support the sole-sourced procurements for those procurement transactions that exceeded the small purchase threshold. Effect or potential effect: Sanford’s screening for suspension and debarment through the third-party vendor results may not be accurate for the period January 1, 2023 through July 31, 2023. Further, by not performing the vendor screening for suspension and debarment prior to transacting with the vendor, Sanford could have potentially entered into a business transaction with suspended or debarred parties. Sanford did not comply with the federal procurement requirements and its procurement policy by not maintaining adequate documentation to support the cost/price analysis or sole sourced vendor selections in addition to not timely completing the sole source justification forms. Section III—Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Questioned costs: $307,249 determined as the amount of the procurement expenditures included in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for two procurement transactions that had inadequate documentation to justify sole source selection. Context: To ensure compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.213, Sanford conducts both preventive and detective controls in its vendor setup and monitoring process to ensure new vendors and active vendors are not suspended or debarred. A consistent vendor setup process is followed for each new vendor that Sanford transacts with, regardless of whether the vendor transactions are funded through federal grant funding or through other sources. To prevent a suspended or debarred vendor from being added as a new vendor, the vendor is checked against the suspension and debarment database electronically before completion of the vendor setup. Subsequent to vendor setup, Sanford also monitors the status of its vendors to ensure the vendor’s status has not changed. We selected 25 new vendors to verify that the suspension and debarment screening was performed and performed timely. We noted for 3 of the 25 vendors, the suspension and debarment screening was not performed prior to setting up the vendor in the system and for 1 of these vendors, Sanford had entered into a transaction prior to performing the suspension and debarment screening. We selected 8 procurement transactions that exceeded the small purchase threshold. Of the 8 transactions, 4 transactions did not follow the federal procurement standards and Sanford’s procurement policy which requires sole source documentation be completed prior to procuring the items. Additionally, for 2 of these 4 transactions, Sanford did not have sufficient documentation maintained to support the cost/price analysis performed or justification to support the sole source selection of the vendors. Total federal expenditures subject to suspension and debarment is $2,870,421, and federal expenditures exceeding the micro purchase threshold is $2,298,733. Total federal expenditures under the program, as reported on the SEFA, is $2,870,421. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This finding is a repeat of Finding 2022-001 in the prior year. Recommendation: Management should ensure that the suspension and debarment screening is performed prior to entering into the transaction with the vendor and also ensure that it follows the procurement policy to verify suspension and debarment of the vendor prior to setting up the vendor in the system. In addition, Management should ensure that any sole sourced purchases or when quotes are obtained, that those be documented prior to entering into the procurement transaction. Views of responsible officials: Sanford continues to document periodic validation of the suspension and debarment search results performed by the third-party vendor for vendor searches that yield no suspension and debarment match. Additionally, as part of the periodic validation, Sanford will include a validation to ensure a suspension and debarment search is completed prior to setting the vendor up in the system. Sanford will re-educate appropriate staff regarding the process to verify a suspension and debarment search is completed prior to setting up the vendor in the system. Sanford’s preventative and detective controls and operating procedures provide reasonable assurance over the effectiveness of the controls necessary to prevent the risk of federal funds being paid to vendors that are suspended or debarred. Sanford’s preventive and detective controls and operating procedures provide reasonable assurance over the effectiveness of the controls necessary to prevent the risk of federal funds being utilized for items that do not adhere to the procurement standards. Sanford will re-educate applicable parties and enhance its procedural documentation regarding procurement. Sanford will implement a monthly review process of federal funds utilized for procurement.
Identification of the federal program: Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Pass-Through Entities: North Dakota Department of Health, South Dakota Department of Health and Minnesota Department of Health Assistance Listing: 93.155; COVID-19 Rural Health Research Centers Award Numbers: Various Award Year: FY 2021 – 2023 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” The Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.213 states, “Non-federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR Part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities”. In addition, Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.320 (c) states: “There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold; (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate.” Further, Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.320(a)(2) states: Small purchases – “The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity.” Condition: We noted the following matters during our testing of Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements: • A third-party vendor performed the suspension and debarment validation process for Sanford. The third-party vendor does not have a SOC 1 (System and Organization Controls) Report. For a portion of the year, Sanford relied on the suspension and debarment checks performed by the third-party vendor for results concluding no match without completing a validation control to ensure the results provided by the third-party vendor were accurate. • We noted instances where the vendor screening for suspension and debarment was not performed prior to setting up the vendor in the System and procuring the goods/services. Section III—Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) • For certain procurement transactions tested, we noted Sanford did not adhere to the compliance requirements and did not follow its procurement policy by maintaining documentation related to cost/price analysis or sole-source procurement and completing the sole-source justification forms timely. Cause: Sanford utilizes a third-party vendor to perform suspension and debarment checks on its vendors, both during the vendor setup process as well as ongoing monitoring of active vendors. Sanford did not add an additional validation control until August 2023 to ensure that the suspension and debarment checks performed by the third-party vendor aligned with the governmental suspension and debarment database when the search resulted in no match. In addition, Sanford did not follow its procurement policy and perform the vendor screening for suspension and debarment prior to setting up the vendor in the system and transacting with the vendors. Furthermore, Sanford, prior to entering into the procurement transaction, did not complete the sole-source justification forms, or maintain documentation to support the sole-sourced procurements for those procurement transactions that exceeded the small purchase threshold. Effect or potential effect: Sanford’s screening for suspension and debarment through the third-party vendor results may not be accurate for the period January 1, 2023 through July 31, 2023. Further, by not performing the vendor screening for suspension and debarment prior to transacting with the vendor, Sanford could have potentially entered into a business transaction with suspended or debarred parties. Sanford did not comply with the federal procurement requirements and its procurement policy by not maintaining adequate documentation to support the cost/price analysis or sole sourced vendor selections in addition to not timely completing the sole source justification forms. Section III—Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Questioned costs: $307,249 determined as the amount of the procurement expenditures included in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for two procurement transactions that had inadequate documentation to justify sole source selection. Context: To ensure compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.213, Sanford conducts both preventive and detective controls in its vendor setup and monitoring process to ensure new vendors and active vendors are not suspended or debarred. A consistent vendor setup process is followed for each new vendor that Sanford transacts with, regardless of whether the vendor transactions are funded through federal grant funding or through other sources. To prevent a suspended or debarred vendor from being added as a new vendor, the vendor is checked against the suspension and debarment database electronically before completion of the vendor setup. Subsequent to vendor setup, Sanford also monitors the status of its vendors to ensure the vendor’s status has not changed. We selected 25 new vendors to verify that the suspension and debarment screening was performed and performed timely. We noted for 3 of the 25 vendors, the suspension and debarment screening was not performed prior to setting up the vendor in the system and for 1 of these vendors, Sanford had entered into a transaction prior to performing the suspension and debarment screening. We selected 8 procurement transactions that exceeded the small purchase threshold. Of the 8 transactions, 4 transactions did not follow the federal procurement standards and Sanford’s procurement policy which requires sole source documentation be completed prior to procuring the items. Additionally, for 2 of these 4 transactions, Sanford did not have sufficient documentation maintained to support the cost/price analysis performed or justification to support the sole source selection of the vendors. Total federal expenditures subject to suspension and debarment is $2,870,421, and federal expenditures exceeding the micro purchase threshold is $2,298,733. Total federal expenditures under the program, as reported on the SEFA, is $2,870,421. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This finding is a repeat of Finding 2022-001 in the prior year. Recommendation: Management should ensure that the suspension and debarment screening is performed prior to entering into the transaction with the vendor and also ensure that it follows the procurement policy to verify suspension and debarment of the vendor prior to setting up the vendor in the system. In addition, Management should ensure that any sole sourced purchases or when quotes are obtained, that those be documented prior to entering into the procurement transaction. Views of responsible officials: Sanford continues to document periodic validation of the suspension and debarment search results performed by the third-party vendor for vendor searches that yield no suspension and debarment match. Additionally, as part of the periodic validation, Sanford will include a validation to ensure a suspension and debarment search is completed prior to setting the vendor up in the system. Sanford will re-educate appropriate staff regarding the process to verify a suspension and debarment search is completed prior to setting up the vendor in the system. Sanford’s preventative and detective controls and operating procedures provide reasonable assurance over the effectiveness of the controls necessary to prevent the risk of federal funds being paid to vendors that are suspended or debarred. Sanford’s preventive and detective controls and operating procedures provide reasonable assurance over the effectiveness of the controls necessary to prevent the risk of federal funds being utilized for items that do not adhere to the procurement standards. Sanford will re-educate applicable parties and enhance its procedural documentation regarding procurement. Sanford will implement a monthly review process of federal funds utilized for procurement.
Identification of the federal program: Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Pass-Through Entities: North Dakota Department of Health, South Dakota Department of Health and Minnesota Department of Health Assistance Listing: 93.155; COVID-19 Rural Health Research Centers Award Numbers: Various Award Year: FY 2021 – 2023 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” The Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.213 states, “Non-federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR Part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities”. In addition, Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.320 (c) states: “There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold; (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate.” Further, Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Section 200.320(a)(2) states: Small purchases – “The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity.” Condition: We noted the following matters during our testing of Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements: • A third-party vendor performed the suspension and debarment validation process for Sanford. The third-party vendor does not have a SOC 1 (System and Organization Controls) Report. For a portion of the year, Sanford relied on the suspension and debarment checks performed by the third-party vendor for results concluding no match without completing a validation control to ensure the results provided by the third-party vendor were accurate. • We noted instances where the vendor screening for suspension and debarment was not performed prior to setting up the vendor in the System and procuring the goods/services. Section III—Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) • For certain procurement transactions tested, we noted Sanford did not adhere to the compliance requirements and did not follow its procurement policy by maintaining documentation related to cost/price analysis or sole-source procurement and completing the sole-source justification forms timely. Cause: Sanford utilizes a third-party vendor to perform suspension and debarment checks on its vendors, both during the vendor setup process as well as ongoing monitoring of active vendors. Sanford did not add an additional validation control until August 2023 to ensure that the suspension and debarment checks performed by the third-party vendor aligned with the governmental suspension and debarment database when the search resulted in no match. In addition, Sanford did not follow its procurement policy and perform the vendor screening for suspension and debarment prior to setting up the vendor in the system and transacting with the vendors. Furthermore, Sanford, prior to entering into the procurement transaction, did not complete the sole-source justification forms, or maintain documentation to support the sole-sourced procurements for those procurement transactions that exceeded the small purchase threshold. Effect or potential effect: Sanford’s screening for suspension and debarment through the third-party vendor results may not be accurate for the period January 1, 2023 through July 31, 2023. Further, by not performing the vendor screening for suspension and debarment prior to transacting with the vendor, Sanford could have potentially entered into a business transaction with suspended or debarred parties. Sanford did not comply with the federal procurement requirements and its procurement policy by not maintaining adequate documentation to support the cost/price analysis or sole sourced vendor selections in addition to not timely completing the sole source justification forms. Section III—Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Questioned costs: $307,249 determined as the amount of the procurement expenditures included in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for two procurement transactions that had inadequate documentation to justify sole source selection. Context: To ensure compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.213, Sanford conducts both preventive and detective controls in its vendor setup and monitoring process to ensure new vendors and active vendors are not suspended or debarred. A consistent vendor setup process is followed for each new vendor that Sanford transacts with, regardless of whether the vendor transactions are funded through federal grant funding or through other sources. To prevent a suspended or debarred vendor from being added as a new vendor, the vendor is checked against the suspension and debarment database electronically before completion of the vendor setup. Subsequent to vendor setup, Sanford also monitors the status of its vendors to ensure the vendor’s status has not changed. We selected 25 new vendors to verify that the suspension and debarment screening was performed and performed timely. We noted for 3 of the 25 vendors, the suspension and debarment screening was not performed prior to setting up the vendor in the system and for 1 of these vendors, Sanford had entered into a transaction prior to performing the suspension and debarment screening. We selected 8 procurement transactions that exceeded the small purchase threshold. Of the 8 transactions, 4 transactions did not follow the federal procurement standards and Sanford’s procurement policy which requires sole source documentation be completed prior to procuring the items. Additionally, for 2 of these 4 transactions, Sanford did not have sufficient documentation maintained to support the cost/price analysis performed or justification to support the sole source selection of the vendors. Total federal expenditures subject to suspension and debarment is $2,870,421, and federal expenditures exceeding the micro purchase threshold is $2,298,733. Total federal expenditures under the program, as reported on the SEFA, is $2,870,421. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This finding is a repeat of Finding 2022-001 in the prior year. Recommendation: Management should ensure that the suspension and debarment screening is performed prior to entering into the transaction with the vendor and also ensure that it follows the procurement policy to verify suspension and debarment of the vendor prior to setting up the vendor in the system. In addition, Management should ensure that any sole sourced purchases or when quotes are obtained, that those be documented prior to entering into the procurement transaction. Views of responsible officials: Sanford continues to document periodic validation of the suspension and debarment search results performed by the third-party vendor for vendor searches that yield no suspension and debarment match. Additionally, as part of the periodic validation, Sanford will include a validation to ensure a suspension and debarment search is completed prior to setting the vendor up in the system. Sanford will re-educate appropriate staff regarding the process to verify a suspension and debarment search is completed prior to setting up the vendor in the system. Sanford’s preventative and detective controls and operating procedures provide reasonable assurance over the effectiveness of the controls necessary to prevent the risk of federal funds being paid to vendors that are suspended or debarred. Sanford’s preventive and detective controls and operating procedures provide reasonable assurance over the effectiveness of the controls necessary to prevent the risk of federal funds being utilized for items that do not adhere to the procurement standards. Sanford will re-educate applicable parties and enhance its procedural documentation regarding procurement. Sanford will implement a monthly review process of federal funds utilized for procurement.