Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Title: Research and Development CFDA Number: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Other Matters) Criteria or specific requirement: Per Uniform Guidance 2 CFR sections 200.212, 200.318(h) and 180.300, along with 48 CFR section 52.209-6, a non-federal entity must have procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Condition: The University could not produce documentation to show that they performed suspension and debarment verification procedures prior to contracting with the vendors. Questioned costs: None. Context: For 2 of vendors we tested, the University did not maintain documentation to demonstrate that verification procedures were performed prior to contracting with the vendors. However, the University was able to subsequently verify that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Cause: While the University has suspension and debarment procedures in place, they did not document that the check had been completed for these 2 vendors. Effect: If verification procedures are not performed in a timely manner, the University could enter into contracts with vendors who are suspended or debarred and risk noncompliance and/or disallowed costs. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University document suspension and debarment procedures going forward for any aggregate disbursements with vendors greater than $25,000. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Management has addressed their corrective action plan in a separately issued letter.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Title: Research and Development CFDA Number: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Other Matters) Criteria or specific requirement: Per Uniform Guidance 2 CFR sections 200.212, 200.318(h) and 180.300, along with 48 CFR section 52.209-6, a non-federal entity must have procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Condition: The University could not produce documentation to show that they performed suspension and debarment verification procedures prior to contracting with the vendors. Questioned costs: None. Context: For 2 of vendors we tested, the University did not maintain documentation to demonstrate that verification procedures were performed prior to contracting with the vendors. However, the University was able to subsequently verify that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Cause: While the University has suspension and debarment procedures in place, they did not document that the check had been completed for these 2 vendors. Effect: If verification procedures are not performed in a timely manner, the University could enter into contracts with vendors who are suspended or debarred and risk noncompliance and/or disallowed costs. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University document suspension and debarment procedures going forward for any aggregate disbursements with vendors greater than $25,000. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Management has addressed their corrective action plan in a separately issued letter.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Title: Research and Development CFDA Number: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Other Matters) Criteria or specific requirement: Per Uniform Guidance 2 CFR sections 200.212, 200.318(h) and 180.300, along with 48 CFR section 52.209-6, a non-federal entity must have procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Condition: The University could not produce documentation to show that they performed suspension and debarment verification procedures prior to contracting with the vendors. Questioned costs: None. Context: For 2 of vendors we tested, the University did not maintain documentation to demonstrate that verification procedures were performed prior to contracting with the vendors. However, the University was able to subsequently verify that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Cause: While the University has suspension and debarment procedures in place, they did not document that the check had been completed for these 2 vendors. Effect: If verification procedures are not performed in a timely manner, the University could enter into contracts with vendors who are suspended or debarred and risk noncompliance and/or disallowed costs. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University document suspension and debarment procedures going forward for any aggregate disbursements with vendors greater than $25,000. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Management has addressed their corrective action plan in a separately issued letter.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Title: Research and Development CFDA Number: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Other Matters) Criteria or specific requirement: Per Uniform Guidance 2 CFR sections 200.212, 200.318(h) and 180.300, along with 48 CFR section 52.209-6, a non-federal entity must have procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Condition: The University could not produce documentation to show that they performed suspension and debarment verification procedures prior to contracting with the vendors. Questioned costs: None. Context: For 2 of vendors we tested, the University did not maintain documentation to demonstrate that verification procedures were performed prior to contracting with the vendors. However, the University was able to subsequently verify that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Cause: While the University has suspension and debarment procedures in place, they did not document that the check had been completed for these 2 vendors. Effect: If verification procedures are not performed in a timely manner, the University could enter into contracts with vendors who are suspended or debarred and risk noncompliance and/or disallowed costs. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University document suspension and debarment procedures going forward for any aggregate disbursements with vendors greater than $25,000. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Management has addressed their corrective action plan in a separately issued letter.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Title: Research and Development CFDA Number: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Other Matters) Criteria or specific requirement: Per Uniform Guidance 2 CFR sections 200.212, 200.318(h) and 180.300, along with 48 CFR section 52.209-6, a non-federal entity must have procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Condition: The University could not produce documentation to show that they performed suspension and debarment verification procedures prior to contracting with the vendors. Questioned costs: None. Context: For 2 of vendors we tested, the University did not maintain documentation to demonstrate that verification procedures were performed prior to contracting with the vendors. However, the University was able to subsequently verify that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Cause: While the University has suspension and debarment procedures in place, they did not document that the check had been completed for these 2 vendors. Effect: If verification procedures are not performed in a timely manner, the University could enter into contracts with vendors who are suspended or debarred and risk noncompliance and/or disallowed costs. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University document suspension and debarment procedures going forward for any aggregate disbursements with vendors greater than $25,000. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Management has addressed their corrective action plan in a separately issued letter.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Title: Research and Development CFDA Number: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Other Matters) Criteria or specific requirement: Per Uniform Guidance 2 CFR sections 200.212, 200.318(h) and 180.300, along with 48 CFR section 52.209-6, a non-federal entity must have procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Condition: The University could not produce documentation to show that they performed suspension and debarment verification procedures prior to contracting with the vendors. Questioned costs: None. Context: For 2 of vendors we tested, the University did not maintain documentation to demonstrate that verification procedures were performed prior to contracting with the vendors. However, the University was able to subsequently verify that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Cause: While the University has suspension and debarment procedures in place, they did not document that the check had been completed for these 2 vendors. Effect: If verification procedures are not performed in a timely manner, the University could enter into contracts with vendors who are suspended or debarred and risk noncompliance and/or disallowed costs. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University document suspension and debarment procedures going forward for any aggregate disbursements with vendors greater than $25,000. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Management has addressed their corrective action plan in a separately issued letter.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Title: Research and Development CFDA Number: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Other Matters) Criteria or specific requirement: Per Uniform Guidance 2 CFR sections 200.212, 200.318(h) and 180.300, along with 48 CFR section 52.209-6, a non-federal entity must have procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Condition: The University could not produce documentation to show that they performed suspension and debarment verification procedures prior to contracting with the vendors. Questioned costs: None. Context: For 2 of vendors we tested, the University did not maintain documentation to demonstrate that verification procedures were performed prior to contracting with the vendors. However, the University was able to subsequently verify that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Cause: While the University has suspension and debarment procedures in place, they did not document that the check had been completed for these 2 vendors. Effect: If verification procedures are not performed in a timely manner, the University could enter into contracts with vendors who are suspended or debarred and risk noncompliance and/or disallowed costs. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University document suspension and debarment procedures going forward for any aggregate disbursements with vendors greater than $25,000. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Management has addressed their corrective action plan in a separately issued letter.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Title: Research and Development CFDA Number: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Other Matters) Criteria or specific requirement: Per Uniform Guidance 2 CFR sections 200.212, 200.318(h) and 180.300, along with 48 CFR section 52.209-6, a non-federal entity must have procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Condition: The University could not produce documentation to show that they performed suspension and debarment verification procedures prior to contracting with the vendors. Questioned costs: None. Context: For 2 of vendors we tested, the University did not maintain documentation to demonstrate that verification procedures were performed prior to contracting with the vendors. However, the University was able to subsequently verify that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Cause: While the University has suspension and debarment procedures in place, they did not document that the check had been completed for these 2 vendors. Effect: If verification procedures are not performed in a timely manner, the University could enter into contracts with vendors who are suspended or debarred and risk noncompliance and/or disallowed costs. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University document suspension and debarment procedures going forward for any aggregate disbursements with vendors greater than $25,000. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Management has addressed their corrective action plan in a separately issued letter.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Title: Research and Development CFDA Number: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Other Matters) Criteria or specific requirement: Per Uniform Guidance 2 CFR sections 200.212, 200.318(h) and 180.300, along with 48 CFR section 52.209-6, a non-federal entity must have procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Condition: The University could not produce documentation to show that they performed suspension and debarment verification procedures prior to contracting with the vendors. Questioned costs: None. Context: For 2 of vendors we tested, the University did not maintain documentation to demonstrate that verification procedures were performed prior to contracting with the vendors. However, the University was able to subsequently verify that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Cause: While the University has suspension and debarment procedures in place, they did not document that the check had been completed for these 2 vendors. Effect: If verification procedures are not performed in a timely manner, the University could enter into contracts with vendors who are suspended or debarred and risk noncompliance and/or disallowed costs. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University document suspension and debarment procedures going forward for any aggregate disbursements with vendors greater than $25,000. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Management has addressed their corrective action plan in a separately issued letter.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Title: Research and Development CFDA Number: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Other Matters) Criteria or specific requirement: Per Uniform Guidance 2 CFR sections 200.212, 200.318(h) and 180.300, along with 48 CFR section 52.209-6, a non-federal entity must have procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Condition: The University could not produce documentation to show that they performed suspension and debarment verification procedures prior to contracting with the vendors. Questioned costs: None. Context: For 2 of vendors we tested, the University did not maintain documentation to demonstrate that verification procedures were performed prior to contracting with the vendors. However, the University was able to subsequently verify that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Cause: While the University has suspension and debarment procedures in place, they did not document that the check had been completed for these 2 vendors. Effect: If verification procedures are not performed in a timely manner, the University could enter into contracts with vendors who are suspended or debarred and risk noncompliance and/or disallowed costs. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University document suspension and debarment procedures going forward for any aggregate disbursements with vendors greater than $25,000. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Management has addressed their corrective action plan in a separately issued letter.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Title: Research and Development CFDA Number: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Other Matters) Criteria or specific requirement: Per Uniform Guidance 2 CFR sections 200.212, 200.318(h) and 180.300, along with 48 CFR section 52.209-6, a non-federal entity must have procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Condition: The University could not produce documentation to show that they performed suspension and debarment verification procedures prior to contracting with the vendors. Questioned costs: None. Context: For 2 of vendors we tested, the University did not maintain documentation to demonstrate that verification procedures were performed prior to contracting with the vendors. However, the University was able to subsequently verify that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Cause: While the University has suspension and debarment procedures in place, they did not document that the check had been completed for these 2 vendors. Effect: If verification procedures are not performed in a timely manner, the University could enter into contracts with vendors who are suspended or debarred and risk noncompliance and/or disallowed costs. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University document suspension and debarment procedures going forward for any aggregate disbursements with vendors greater than $25,000. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Management has addressed their corrective action plan in a separately issued letter.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Title: Research and Development CFDA Number: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Other Matters) Criteria or specific requirement: Per Uniform Guidance 2 CFR sections 200.212, 200.318(h) and 180.300, along with 48 CFR section 52.209-6, a non-federal entity must have procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Condition: The University could not produce documentation to show that they performed suspension and debarment verification procedures prior to contracting with the vendors. Questioned costs: None. Context: For 2 of vendors we tested, the University did not maintain documentation to demonstrate that verification procedures were performed prior to contracting with the vendors. However, the University was able to subsequently verify that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Cause: While the University has suspension and debarment procedures in place, they did not document that the check had been completed for these 2 vendors. Effect: If verification procedures are not performed in a timely manner, the University could enter into contracts with vendors who are suspended or debarred and risk noncompliance and/or disallowed costs. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University document suspension and debarment procedures going forward for any aggregate disbursements with vendors greater than $25,000. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Management has addressed their corrective action plan in a separately issued letter.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Title: Research and Development CFDA Number: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Other Matters) Criteria or specific requirement: Per Uniform Guidance 2 CFR sections 200.212, 200.318(h) and 180.300, along with 48 CFR section 52.209-6, a non-federal entity must have procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Condition: The University could not produce documentation to show that they performed suspension and debarment verification procedures prior to contracting with the vendors. Questioned costs: None. Context: For 2 of vendors we tested, the University did not maintain documentation to demonstrate that verification procedures were performed prior to contracting with the vendors. However, the University was able to subsequently verify that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Cause: While the University has suspension and debarment procedures in place, they did not document that the check had been completed for these 2 vendors. Effect: If verification procedures are not performed in a timely manner, the University could enter into contracts with vendors who are suspended or debarred and risk noncompliance and/or disallowed costs. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University document suspension and debarment procedures going forward for any aggregate disbursements with vendors greater than $25,000. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Management has addressed their corrective action plan in a separately issued letter.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Title: Research and Development CFDA Number: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Other Matters) Criteria or specific requirement: Per Uniform Guidance 2 CFR sections 200.212, 200.318(h) and 180.300, along with 48 CFR section 52.209-6, a non-federal entity must have procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Condition: The University could not produce documentation to show that they performed suspension and debarment verification procedures prior to contracting with the vendors. Questioned costs: None. Context: For 2 of vendors we tested, the University did not maintain documentation to demonstrate that verification procedures were performed prior to contracting with the vendors. However, the University was able to subsequently verify that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Cause: While the University has suspension and debarment procedures in place, they did not document that the check had been completed for these 2 vendors. Effect: If verification procedures are not performed in a timely manner, the University could enter into contracts with vendors who are suspended or debarred and risk noncompliance and/or disallowed costs. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University document suspension and debarment procedures going forward for any aggregate disbursements with vendors greater than $25,000. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Management has addressed their corrective action plan in a separately issued letter.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Title: Research and Development CFDA Number: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Other Matters) Criteria or specific requirement: Per Uniform Guidance 2 CFR sections 200.212, 200.318(h) and 180.300, along with 48 CFR section 52.209-6, a non-federal entity must have procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Condition: The University could not produce documentation to show that they performed suspension and debarment verification procedures prior to contracting with the vendors. Questioned costs: None. Context: For 2 of vendors we tested, the University did not maintain documentation to demonstrate that verification procedures were performed prior to contracting with the vendors. However, the University was able to subsequently verify that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Cause: While the University has suspension and debarment procedures in place, they did not document that the check had been completed for these 2 vendors. Effect: If verification procedures are not performed in a timely manner, the University could enter into contracts with vendors who are suspended or debarred and risk noncompliance and/or disallowed costs. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University document suspension and debarment procedures going forward for any aggregate disbursements with vendors greater than $25,000. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Management has addressed their corrective action plan in a separately issued letter.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Title: Research and Development CFDA Number: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Other Matters) Criteria or specific requirement: Per Uniform Guidance 2 CFR sections 200.212, 200.318(h) and 180.300, along with 48 CFR section 52.209-6, a non-federal entity must have procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Condition: The University could not produce documentation to show that they performed suspension and debarment verification procedures prior to contracting with the vendors. Questioned costs: None. Context: For 2 of vendors we tested, the University did not maintain documentation to demonstrate that verification procedures were performed prior to contracting with the vendors. However, the University was able to subsequently verify that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Cause: While the University has suspension and debarment procedures in place, they did not document that the check had been completed for these 2 vendors. Effect: If verification procedures are not performed in a timely manner, the University could enter into contracts with vendors who are suspended or debarred and risk noncompliance and/or disallowed costs. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University document suspension and debarment procedures going forward for any aggregate disbursements with vendors greater than $25,000. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Management has addressed their corrective action plan in a separately issued letter.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Title: Research and Development CFDA Number: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Other Matters) Criteria or specific requirement: Per Uniform Guidance 2 CFR sections 200.212, 200.318(h) and 180.300, along with 48 CFR section 52.209-6, a non-federal entity must have procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Condition: The University could not produce documentation to show that they performed suspension and debarment verification procedures prior to contracting with the vendors. Questioned costs: None. Context: For 2 of vendors we tested, the University did not maintain documentation to demonstrate that verification procedures were performed prior to contracting with the vendors. However, the University was able to subsequently verify that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Cause: While the University has suspension and debarment procedures in place, they did not document that the check had been completed for these 2 vendors. Effect: If verification procedures are not performed in a timely manner, the University could enter into contracts with vendors who are suspended or debarred and risk noncompliance and/or disallowed costs. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University document suspension and debarment procedures going forward for any aggregate disbursements with vendors greater than $25,000. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Management has addressed their corrective action plan in a separately issued letter.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Title: Research and Development CFDA Number: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Other Matters) Criteria or specific requirement: Per Uniform Guidance 2 CFR sections 200.212, 200.318(h) and 180.300, along with 48 CFR section 52.209-6, a non-federal entity must have procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Condition: The University could not produce documentation to show that they performed suspension and debarment verification procedures prior to contracting with the vendors. Questioned costs: None. Context: For 2 of vendors we tested, the University did not maintain documentation to demonstrate that verification procedures were performed prior to contracting with the vendors. However, the University was able to subsequently verify that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Cause: While the University has suspension and debarment procedures in place, they did not document that the check had been completed for these 2 vendors. Effect: If verification procedures are not performed in a timely manner, the University could enter into contracts with vendors who are suspended or debarred and risk noncompliance and/or disallowed costs. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University document suspension and debarment procedures going forward for any aggregate disbursements with vendors greater than $25,000. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Management has addressed their corrective action plan in a separately issued letter.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Title: Research and Development CFDA Number: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Other Matters) Criteria or specific requirement: Per Uniform Guidance 2 CFR sections 200.212, 200.318(h) and 180.300, along with 48 CFR section 52.209-6, a non-federal entity must have procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Condition: The University could not produce documentation to show that they performed suspension and debarment verification procedures prior to contracting with the vendors. Questioned costs: None. Context: For 2 of vendors we tested, the University did not maintain documentation to demonstrate that verification procedures were performed prior to contracting with the vendors. However, the University was able to subsequently verify that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Cause: While the University has suspension and debarment procedures in place, they did not document that the check had been completed for these 2 vendors. Effect: If verification procedures are not performed in a timely manner, the University could enter into contracts with vendors who are suspended or debarred and risk noncompliance and/or disallowed costs. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University document suspension and debarment procedures going forward for any aggregate disbursements with vendors greater than $25,000. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Management has addressed their corrective action plan in a separately issued letter.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Title: Research and Development CFDA Number: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Other Matters) Criteria or specific requirement: Per Uniform Guidance 2 CFR sections 200.212, 200.318(h) and 180.300, along with 48 CFR section 52.209-6, a non-federal entity must have procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Condition: The University could not produce documentation to show that they performed suspension and debarment verification procedures prior to contracting with the vendors. Questioned costs: None. Context: For 2 of vendors we tested, the University did not maintain documentation to demonstrate that verification procedures were performed prior to contracting with the vendors. However, the University was able to subsequently verify that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Cause: While the University has suspension and debarment procedures in place, they did not document that the check had been completed for these 2 vendors. Effect: If verification procedures are not performed in a timely manner, the University could enter into contracts with vendors who are suspended or debarred and risk noncompliance and/or disallowed costs. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University document suspension and debarment procedures going forward for any aggregate disbursements with vendors greater than $25,000. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Management has addressed their corrective action plan in a separately issued letter.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Title: Research and Development CFDA Number: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Other Matters) Criteria or specific requirement: Per Uniform Guidance 2 CFR sections 200.212, 200.318(h) and 180.300, along with 48 CFR section 52.209-6, a non-federal entity must have procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Condition: The University could not produce documentation to show that they performed suspension and debarment verification procedures prior to contracting with the vendors. Questioned costs: None. Context: For 2 of vendors we tested, the University did not maintain documentation to demonstrate that verification procedures were performed prior to contracting with the vendors. However, the University was able to subsequently verify that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Cause: While the University has suspension and debarment procedures in place, they did not document that the check had been completed for these 2 vendors. Effect: If verification procedures are not performed in a timely manner, the University could enter into contracts with vendors who are suspended or debarred and risk noncompliance and/or disallowed costs. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University document suspension and debarment procedures going forward for any aggregate disbursements with vendors greater than $25,000. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Management has addressed their corrective action plan in a separately issued letter.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Title: Research and Development CFDA Number: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Other Matters) Criteria or specific requirement: Per Uniform Guidance 2 CFR sections 200.212, 200.318(h) and 180.300, along with 48 CFR section 52.209-6, a non-federal entity must have procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Condition: The University could not produce documentation to show that they performed suspension and debarment verification procedures prior to contracting with the vendors. Questioned costs: None. Context: For 2 of vendors we tested, the University did not maintain documentation to demonstrate that verification procedures were performed prior to contracting with the vendors. However, the University was able to subsequently verify that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Cause: While the University has suspension and debarment procedures in place, they did not document that the check had been completed for these 2 vendors. Effect: If verification procedures are not performed in a timely manner, the University could enter into contracts with vendors who are suspended or debarred and risk noncompliance and/or disallowed costs. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University document suspension and debarment procedures going forward for any aggregate disbursements with vendors greater than $25,000. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Management has addressed their corrective action plan in a separately issued letter.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Title: Research and Development CFDA Number: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Other Matters) Criteria or specific requirement: Per Uniform Guidance 2 CFR sections 200.212, 200.318(h) and 180.300, along with 48 CFR section 52.209-6, a non-federal entity must have procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Condition: The University could not produce documentation to show that they performed suspension and debarment verification procedures prior to contracting with the vendors. Questioned costs: None. Context: For 2 of vendors we tested, the University did not maintain documentation to demonstrate that verification procedures were performed prior to contracting with the vendors. However, the University was able to subsequently verify that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Cause: While the University has suspension and debarment procedures in place, they did not document that the check had been completed for these 2 vendors. Effect: If verification procedures are not performed in a timely manner, the University could enter into contracts with vendors who are suspended or debarred and risk noncompliance and/or disallowed costs. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University document suspension and debarment procedures going forward for any aggregate disbursements with vendors greater than $25,000. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Management has addressed their corrective action plan in a separately issued letter.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Title: Research and Development CFDA Number: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Other Matters) Criteria or specific requirement: Per Uniform Guidance 2 CFR sections 200.212, 200.318(h) and 180.300, along with 48 CFR section 52.209-6, a non-federal entity must have procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Condition: The University could not produce documentation to show that they performed suspension and debarment verification procedures prior to contracting with the vendors. Questioned costs: None. Context: For 2 of vendors we tested, the University did not maintain documentation to demonstrate that verification procedures were performed prior to contracting with the vendors. However, the University was able to subsequently verify that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Cause: While the University has suspension and debarment procedures in place, they did not document that the check had been completed for these 2 vendors. Effect: If verification procedures are not performed in a timely manner, the University could enter into contracts with vendors who are suspended or debarred and risk noncompliance and/or disallowed costs. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University document suspension and debarment procedures going forward for any aggregate disbursements with vendors greater than $25,000. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Management has addressed their corrective action plan in a separately issued letter.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Title: Research and Development CFDA Number: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Other Matters) Criteria or specific requirement: Per Uniform Guidance 2 CFR sections 200.212, 200.318(h) and 180.300, along with 48 CFR section 52.209-6, a non-federal entity must have procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Condition: The University could not produce documentation to show that they performed suspension and debarment verification procedures prior to contracting with the vendors. Questioned costs: None. Context: For 2 of vendors we tested, the University did not maintain documentation to demonstrate that verification procedures were performed prior to contracting with the vendors. However, the University was able to subsequently verify that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Cause: While the University has suspension and debarment procedures in place, they did not document that the check had been completed for these 2 vendors. Effect: If verification procedures are not performed in a timely manner, the University could enter into contracts with vendors who are suspended or debarred and risk noncompliance and/or disallowed costs. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University document suspension and debarment procedures going forward for any aggregate disbursements with vendors greater than $25,000. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Management has addressed their corrective action plan in a separately issued letter.
Compliance with Uniform Guidance - Procurement Suspension and Debarment Information on Federal Program: Unaccompanied Alien Children (Assistance Listing No. 93.676) provided by the Department of Health and Human Services. Criteria: 2 CFR Sections 200.212, 200.318(h), and 180.300 and 48 CFR Section 52.209-6 state that a non-Federal entity must review that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from participation in federal award programs. Condition: During our testing for procurement compliance, it was determined that the Home did not verify that vendors charged to the major program are not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from participation in federal award programs. Questioned Cost: None Cause: The Home was not aware of the requirement to review an entity’s status. Effect: The Home is not in compliance with 2 CFR Sections 200.212, 200.318(h), and 180.300 and 48 CFR Section 52.209-6. As a result, the Home could enter into covered transactions with entities that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from participation in federal award programs. Perspective Information: Vendors in excess of the $25,000 threshold were reviewed to determine if they are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from participation in federal award programs. None were noted to be ineligible for participation. Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: We recommend the Home review and document the verification that vendors are not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from participation in federal award programs. Views of the Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: This item was included in the 6/30/22 Report on Compliance for Major Federal Programs which was finalized in February 2023. The G/L Vendor List was found to contain many inactive vendors and was modified. Beginning in October 2023, management began sending the vendor List to EPStaffCheck on a monthly basis. Each vendor is run through OIG (Office of Inspector General for Excluded Individuals/Entities); OIG_Most_Wanted (Fugitives}; SAM (System for Award Management for excluded parties); SON.Office of Foreign Assets Control (Specially Designated Nationals) and NY _Medicaid (Exclusion List).
Suspension and Debarment Federal Award Identification Assistance Listing Program Title: Formula Grants for Rural Areas Assistance Listing Program Number: 20.509 Federal Award ID Number and Year: Various Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Pass-Through Entity: Nebraska Department of Transportation Criteria The Organization’s procurement policy states that all vendors will be checked against the exclusion list on the System for Award Management website. This policy is in accordance with 2 CFR 200.212; 2 CFR 200.318(h); 2 CFR 180.300; 48 CFR 52.209-6. Condition The Organization neglected to comply with its procurement policy when entering into a covered transaction. Repeat Finding No. Cause For the instance in violation of the Organization’s procurement policy, allowable emergency procurement procedures were followed due to an urgent need for the vendor’s services. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization may enter into a covered transaction with a debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded vendor. Questioned Costs No. Statistical Sample No. Context As described in Finding 2023-002, the Organization was the victim of fraud during the fiscal year. In the wake of this event, the Organization hired a 3rd party accountant to assist in the cleanup of the financial records. In the procurement of this accountant, the Organization followed provisions in 2 CFR 200.320(c)(3) which allowed the Organization to quickly engage with the accountant due to the emergent nature of the situation. However, the provisions of 2 CFR 200.320(c)(3) relate to the procurement of vendors, and not to the suspension and debarment of vendors. In this emergency procurement process, the Organization neglected to check the accountant against the exclusion list on the System for Award Management website. The auditor performed a search on this website, noting that the accountant is not on the exclusion list. Recommendation The auditor recommends that, even during emergency procurement procedures, the Organization check its vendors against the exclusion list on the System for Award Management website. Views of Responsible Officials See Corrective Action Plan, below.
Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 21 .027, Department of the Treasury, Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund Federal Award Identification Number and Year - SLFRP2024-2001 Pass-through Entity - Not applicable Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - Yes 2022-002 Criteria - The City should ensure there is a process in place, prior to entering contracts with subrecipients, to verify that such subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded pursuant to 2 CFR Section 180.300. Condition - We noted during testing that the City had unintentionally omitted a subrecipient from its search to ensure that the subrecipient was not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded pursuant to 2 CFR Section 180.300. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - From July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023, any subrecipient with which the City entered into a contract using federal award funds should have been verified as not being suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded pursuant to 2 CFR Sections 200.212, 200.318(h), and 180.300 and 48 CFR Section 52.209-6. We selected three subrecipients for testing, and one lacked any verification. However, based on our testing, we noted that the one subrecipient was not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded pursuant to 2 CFR Section 180.300, thereby creating no questioned costs. Cause and Effect - The City is required to verify that any subrecipient with which it plans to enter into a contract using federal award funds is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded pursuant to 2 CFR Section 180.300. The City did not complete this requirement due to timing of final approval of the subrecipient pass-through funds. Recommendation - We recommend that an additional internal control be put in place to ensure the dual verification of subrecipients occurs. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - Procedures have already been put into place to ensure that each new contractor is not on the federal list of suspended and/or debarred contractors. Furthermore, all vendors previously paid have been searched for in the federal list, and none were suspended and/or debarred.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Title: Research and Development CFDA Number: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Other Matters) Criteria or specific requirement: Per Uniform Guidance 2 CFR sections 200.212, 200.318(h) and 180.300, along with 48 CFR section 52.209-6, a non-federal entity must have procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Condition: The University could not produce documentation to show that they performed suspension and debarment verification procedures prior to contracting with the vendors. Questioned costs: None. Context: For 2 of vendors we tested, the University did not maintain documentation to demonstrate that verification procedures were performed prior to contracting with the vendors. However, the University was able to subsequently verify that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Cause: While the University has suspension and debarment procedures in place, they did not document that the check had been completed for these 2 vendors. Effect: If verification procedures are not performed in a timely manner, the University could enter into contracts with vendors who are suspended or debarred and risk noncompliance and/or disallowed costs. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University document suspension and debarment procedures going forward for any aggregate disbursements with vendors greater than $25,000. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Management has addressed their corrective action plan in a separately issued letter.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Title: Research and Development CFDA Number: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Other Matters) Criteria or specific requirement: Per Uniform Guidance 2 CFR sections 200.212, 200.318(h) and 180.300, along with 48 CFR section 52.209-6, a non-federal entity must have procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Condition: The University could not produce documentation to show that they performed suspension and debarment verification procedures prior to contracting with the vendors. Questioned costs: None. Context: For 2 of vendors we tested, the University did not maintain documentation to demonstrate that verification procedures were performed prior to contracting with the vendors. However, the University was able to subsequently verify that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Cause: While the University has suspension and debarment procedures in place, they did not document that the check had been completed for these 2 vendors. Effect: If verification procedures are not performed in a timely manner, the University could enter into contracts with vendors who are suspended or debarred and risk noncompliance and/or disallowed costs. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University document suspension and debarment procedures going forward for any aggregate disbursements with vendors greater than $25,000. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Management has addressed their corrective action plan in a separately issued letter.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Title: Research and Development CFDA Number: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Other Matters) Criteria or specific requirement: Per Uniform Guidance 2 CFR sections 200.212, 200.318(h) and 180.300, along with 48 CFR section 52.209-6, a non-federal entity must have procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Condition: The University could not produce documentation to show that they performed suspension and debarment verification procedures prior to contracting with the vendors. Questioned costs: None. Context: For 2 of vendors we tested, the University did not maintain documentation to demonstrate that verification procedures were performed prior to contracting with the vendors. However, the University was able to subsequently verify that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Cause: While the University has suspension and debarment procedures in place, they did not document that the check had been completed for these 2 vendors. Effect: If verification procedures are not performed in a timely manner, the University could enter into contracts with vendors who are suspended or debarred and risk noncompliance and/or disallowed costs. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University document suspension and debarment procedures going forward for any aggregate disbursements with vendors greater than $25,000. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Management has addressed their corrective action plan in a separately issued letter.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Title: Research and Development CFDA Number: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Other Matters) Criteria or specific requirement: Per Uniform Guidance 2 CFR sections 200.212, 200.318(h) and 180.300, along with 48 CFR section 52.209-6, a non-federal entity must have procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Condition: The University could not produce documentation to show that they performed suspension and debarment verification procedures prior to contracting with the vendors. Questioned costs: None. Context: For 2 of vendors we tested, the University did not maintain documentation to demonstrate that verification procedures were performed prior to contracting with the vendors. However, the University was able to subsequently verify that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Cause: While the University has suspension and debarment procedures in place, they did not document that the check had been completed for these 2 vendors. Effect: If verification procedures are not performed in a timely manner, the University could enter into contracts with vendors who are suspended or debarred and risk noncompliance and/or disallowed costs. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University document suspension and debarment procedures going forward for any aggregate disbursements with vendors greater than $25,000. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Management has addressed their corrective action plan in a separately issued letter.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Title: Research and Development CFDA Number: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Other Matters) Criteria or specific requirement: Per Uniform Guidance 2 CFR sections 200.212, 200.318(h) and 180.300, along with 48 CFR section 52.209-6, a non-federal entity must have procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Condition: The University could not produce documentation to show that they performed suspension and debarment verification procedures prior to contracting with the vendors. Questioned costs: None. Context: For 2 of vendors we tested, the University did not maintain documentation to demonstrate that verification procedures were performed prior to contracting with the vendors. However, the University was able to subsequently verify that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Cause: While the University has suspension and debarment procedures in place, they did not document that the check had been completed for these 2 vendors. Effect: If verification procedures are not performed in a timely manner, the University could enter into contracts with vendors who are suspended or debarred and risk noncompliance and/or disallowed costs. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University document suspension and debarment procedures going forward for any aggregate disbursements with vendors greater than $25,000. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Management has addressed their corrective action plan in a separately issued letter.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Title: Research and Development CFDA Number: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Other Matters) Criteria or specific requirement: Per Uniform Guidance 2 CFR sections 200.212, 200.318(h) and 180.300, along with 48 CFR section 52.209-6, a non-federal entity must have procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Condition: The University could not produce documentation to show that they performed suspension and debarment verification procedures prior to contracting with the vendors. Questioned costs: None. Context: For 2 of vendors we tested, the University did not maintain documentation to demonstrate that verification procedures were performed prior to contracting with the vendors. However, the University was able to subsequently verify that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Cause: While the University has suspension and debarment procedures in place, they did not document that the check had been completed for these 2 vendors. Effect: If verification procedures are not performed in a timely manner, the University could enter into contracts with vendors who are suspended or debarred and risk noncompliance and/or disallowed costs. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University document suspension and debarment procedures going forward for any aggregate disbursements with vendors greater than $25,000. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Management has addressed their corrective action plan in a separately issued letter.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Title: Research and Development CFDA Number: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Other Matters) Criteria or specific requirement: Per Uniform Guidance 2 CFR sections 200.212, 200.318(h) and 180.300, along with 48 CFR section 52.209-6, a non-federal entity must have procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Condition: The University could not produce documentation to show that they performed suspension and debarment verification procedures prior to contracting with the vendors. Questioned costs: None. Context: For 2 of vendors we tested, the University did not maintain documentation to demonstrate that verification procedures were performed prior to contracting with the vendors. However, the University was able to subsequently verify that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Cause: While the University has suspension and debarment procedures in place, they did not document that the check had been completed for these 2 vendors. Effect: If verification procedures are not performed in a timely manner, the University could enter into contracts with vendors who are suspended or debarred and risk noncompliance and/or disallowed costs. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University document suspension and debarment procedures going forward for any aggregate disbursements with vendors greater than $25,000. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Management has addressed their corrective action plan in a separately issued letter.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Title: Research and Development CFDA Number: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Other Matters) Criteria or specific requirement: Per Uniform Guidance 2 CFR sections 200.212, 200.318(h) and 180.300, along with 48 CFR section 52.209-6, a non-federal entity must have procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Condition: The University could not produce documentation to show that they performed suspension and debarment verification procedures prior to contracting with the vendors. Questioned costs: None. Context: For 2 of vendors we tested, the University did not maintain documentation to demonstrate that verification procedures were performed prior to contracting with the vendors. However, the University was able to subsequently verify that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Cause: While the University has suspension and debarment procedures in place, they did not document that the check had been completed for these 2 vendors. Effect: If verification procedures are not performed in a timely manner, the University could enter into contracts with vendors who are suspended or debarred and risk noncompliance and/or disallowed costs. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University document suspension and debarment procedures going forward for any aggregate disbursements with vendors greater than $25,000. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Management has addressed their corrective action plan in a separately issued letter.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Title: Research and Development CFDA Number: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Other Matters) Criteria or specific requirement: Per Uniform Guidance 2 CFR sections 200.212, 200.318(h) and 180.300, along with 48 CFR section 52.209-6, a non-federal entity must have procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Condition: The University could not produce documentation to show that they performed suspension and debarment verification procedures prior to contracting with the vendors. Questioned costs: None. Context: For 2 of vendors we tested, the University did not maintain documentation to demonstrate that verification procedures were performed prior to contracting with the vendors. However, the University was able to subsequently verify that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Cause: While the University has suspension and debarment procedures in place, they did not document that the check had been completed for these 2 vendors. Effect: If verification procedures are not performed in a timely manner, the University could enter into contracts with vendors who are suspended or debarred and risk noncompliance and/or disallowed costs. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University document suspension and debarment procedures going forward for any aggregate disbursements with vendors greater than $25,000. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Management has addressed their corrective action plan in a separately issued letter.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Title: Research and Development CFDA Number: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Other Matters) Criteria or specific requirement: Per Uniform Guidance 2 CFR sections 200.212, 200.318(h) and 180.300, along with 48 CFR section 52.209-6, a non-federal entity must have procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Condition: The University could not produce documentation to show that they performed suspension and debarment verification procedures prior to contracting with the vendors. Questioned costs: None. Context: For 2 of vendors we tested, the University did not maintain documentation to demonstrate that verification procedures were performed prior to contracting with the vendors. However, the University was able to subsequently verify that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Cause: While the University has suspension and debarment procedures in place, they did not document that the check had been completed for these 2 vendors. Effect: If verification procedures are not performed in a timely manner, the University could enter into contracts with vendors who are suspended or debarred and risk noncompliance and/or disallowed costs. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University document suspension and debarment procedures going forward for any aggregate disbursements with vendors greater than $25,000. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Management has addressed their corrective action plan in a separately issued letter.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Title: Research and Development CFDA Number: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Other Matters) Criteria or specific requirement: Per Uniform Guidance 2 CFR sections 200.212, 200.318(h) and 180.300, along with 48 CFR section 52.209-6, a non-federal entity must have procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Condition: The University could not produce documentation to show that they performed suspension and debarment verification procedures prior to contracting with the vendors. Questioned costs: None. Context: For 2 of vendors we tested, the University did not maintain documentation to demonstrate that verification procedures were performed prior to contracting with the vendors. However, the University was able to subsequently verify that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Cause: While the University has suspension and debarment procedures in place, they did not document that the check had been completed for these 2 vendors. Effect: If verification procedures are not performed in a timely manner, the University could enter into contracts with vendors who are suspended or debarred and risk noncompliance and/or disallowed costs. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University document suspension and debarment procedures going forward for any aggregate disbursements with vendors greater than $25,000. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Management has addressed their corrective action plan in a separately issued letter.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Title: Research and Development CFDA Number: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Other Matters) Criteria or specific requirement: Per Uniform Guidance 2 CFR sections 200.212, 200.318(h) and 180.300, along with 48 CFR section 52.209-6, a non-federal entity must have procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Condition: The University could not produce documentation to show that they performed suspension and debarment verification procedures prior to contracting with the vendors. Questioned costs: None. Context: For 2 of vendors we tested, the University did not maintain documentation to demonstrate that verification procedures were performed prior to contracting with the vendors. However, the University was able to subsequently verify that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Cause: While the University has suspension and debarment procedures in place, they did not document that the check had been completed for these 2 vendors. Effect: If verification procedures are not performed in a timely manner, the University could enter into contracts with vendors who are suspended or debarred and risk noncompliance and/or disallowed costs. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University document suspension and debarment procedures going forward for any aggregate disbursements with vendors greater than $25,000. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Management has addressed their corrective action plan in a separately issued letter.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Title: Research and Development CFDA Number: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Other Matters) Criteria or specific requirement: Per Uniform Guidance 2 CFR sections 200.212, 200.318(h) and 180.300, along with 48 CFR section 52.209-6, a non-federal entity must have procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Condition: The University could not produce documentation to show that they performed suspension and debarment verification procedures prior to contracting with the vendors. Questioned costs: None. Context: For 2 of vendors we tested, the University did not maintain documentation to demonstrate that verification procedures were performed prior to contracting with the vendors. However, the University was able to subsequently verify that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Cause: While the University has suspension and debarment procedures in place, they did not document that the check had been completed for these 2 vendors. Effect: If verification procedures are not performed in a timely manner, the University could enter into contracts with vendors who are suspended or debarred and risk noncompliance and/or disallowed costs. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University document suspension and debarment procedures going forward for any aggregate disbursements with vendors greater than $25,000. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Management has addressed their corrective action plan in a separately issued letter.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Title: Research and Development CFDA Number: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Other Matters) Criteria or specific requirement: Per Uniform Guidance 2 CFR sections 200.212, 200.318(h) and 180.300, along with 48 CFR section 52.209-6, a non-federal entity must have procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Condition: The University could not produce documentation to show that they performed suspension and debarment verification procedures prior to contracting with the vendors. Questioned costs: None. Context: For 2 of vendors we tested, the University did not maintain documentation to demonstrate that verification procedures were performed prior to contracting with the vendors. However, the University was able to subsequently verify that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Cause: While the University has suspension and debarment procedures in place, they did not document that the check had been completed for these 2 vendors. Effect: If verification procedures are not performed in a timely manner, the University could enter into contracts with vendors who are suspended or debarred and risk noncompliance and/or disallowed costs. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University document suspension and debarment procedures going forward for any aggregate disbursements with vendors greater than $25,000. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Management has addressed their corrective action plan in a separately issued letter.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Title: Research and Development CFDA Number: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Other Matters) Criteria or specific requirement: Per Uniform Guidance 2 CFR sections 200.212, 200.318(h) and 180.300, along with 48 CFR section 52.209-6, a non-federal entity must have procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Condition: The University could not produce documentation to show that they performed suspension and debarment verification procedures prior to contracting with the vendors. Questioned costs: None. Context: For 2 of vendors we tested, the University did not maintain documentation to demonstrate that verification procedures were performed prior to contracting with the vendors. However, the University was able to subsequently verify that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Cause: While the University has suspension and debarment procedures in place, they did not document that the check had been completed for these 2 vendors. Effect: If verification procedures are not performed in a timely manner, the University could enter into contracts with vendors who are suspended or debarred and risk noncompliance and/or disallowed costs. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University document suspension and debarment procedures going forward for any aggregate disbursements with vendors greater than $25,000. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Management has addressed their corrective action plan in a separately issued letter.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Title: Research and Development CFDA Number: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Other Matters) Criteria or specific requirement: Per Uniform Guidance 2 CFR sections 200.212, 200.318(h) and 180.300, along with 48 CFR section 52.209-6, a non-federal entity must have procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Condition: The University could not produce documentation to show that they performed suspension and debarment verification procedures prior to contracting with the vendors. Questioned costs: None. Context: For 2 of vendors we tested, the University did not maintain documentation to demonstrate that verification procedures were performed prior to contracting with the vendors. However, the University was able to subsequently verify that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Cause: While the University has suspension and debarment procedures in place, they did not document that the check had been completed for these 2 vendors. Effect: If verification procedures are not performed in a timely manner, the University could enter into contracts with vendors who are suspended or debarred and risk noncompliance and/or disallowed costs. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University document suspension and debarment procedures going forward for any aggregate disbursements with vendors greater than $25,000. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Management has addressed their corrective action plan in a separately issued letter.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Title: Research and Development CFDA Number: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Other Matters) Criteria or specific requirement: Per Uniform Guidance 2 CFR sections 200.212, 200.318(h) and 180.300, along with 48 CFR section 52.209-6, a non-federal entity must have procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Condition: The University could not produce documentation to show that they performed suspension and debarment verification procedures prior to contracting with the vendors. Questioned costs: None. Context: For 2 of vendors we tested, the University did not maintain documentation to demonstrate that verification procedures were performed prior to contracting with the vendors. However, the University was able to subsequently verify that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Cause: While the University has suspension and debarment procedures in place, they did not document that the check had been completed for these 2 vendors. Effect: If verification procedures are not performed in a timely manner, the University could enter into contracts with vendors who are suspended or debarred and risk noncompliance and/or disallowed costs. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University document suspension and debarment procedures going forward for any aggregate disbursements with vendors greater than $25,000. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Management has addressed their corrective action plan in a separately issued letter.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Title: Research and Development CFDA Number: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Other Matters) Criteria or specific requirement: Per Uniform Guidance 2 CFR sections 200.212, 200.318(h) and 180.300, along with 48 CFR section 52.209-6, a non-federal entity must have procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Condition: The University could not produce documentation to show that they performed suspension and debarment verification procedures prior to contracting with the vendors. Questioned costs: None. Context: For 2 of vendors we tested, the University did not maintain documentation to demonstrate that verification procedures were performed prior to contracting with the vendors. However, the University was able to subsequently verify that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Cause: While the University has suspension and debarment procedures in place, they did not document that the check had been completed for these 2 vendors. Effect: If verification procedures are not performed in a timely manner, the University could enter into contracts with vendors who are suspended or debarred and risk noncompliance and/or disallowed costs. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University document suspension and debarment procedures going forward for any aggregate disbursements with vendors greater than $25,000. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Management has addressed their corrective action plan in a separately issued letter.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Title: Research and Development CFDA Number: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Other Matters) Criteria or specific requirement: Per Uniform Guidance 2 CFR sections 200.212, 200.318(h) and 180.300, along with 48 CFR section 52.209-6, a non-federal entity must have procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Condition: The University could not produce documentation to show that they performed suspension and debarment verification procedures prior to contracting with the vendors. Questioned costs: None. Context: For 2 of vendors we tested, the University did not maintain documentation to demonstrate that verification procedures were performed prior to contracting with the vendors. However, the University was able to subsequently verify that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Cause: While the University has suspension and debarment procedures in place, they did not document that the check had been completed for these 2 vendors. Effect: If verification procedures are not performed in a timely manner, the University could enter into contracts with vendors who are suspended or debarred and risk noncompliance and/or disallowed costs. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University document suspension and debarment procedures going forward for any aggregate disbursements with vendors greater than $25,000. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Management has addressed their corrective action plan in a separately issued letter.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Title: Research and Development CFDA Number: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Other Matters) Criteria or specific requirement: Per Uniform Guidance 2 CFR sections 200.212, 200.318(h) and 180.300, along with 48 CFR section 52.209-6, a non-federal entity must have procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Condition: The University could not produce documentation to show that they performed suspension and debarment verification procedures prior to contracting with the vendors. Questioned costs: None. Context: For 2 of vendors we tested, the University did not maintain documentation to demonstrate that verification procedures were performed prior to contracting with the vendors. However, the University was able to subsequently verify that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Cause: While the University has suspension and debarment procedures in place, they did not document that the check had been completed for these 2 vendors. Effect: If verification procedures are not performed in a timely manner, the University could enter into contracts with vendors who are suspended or debarred and risk noncompliance and/or disallowed costs. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University document suspension and debarment procedures going forward for any aggregate disbursements with vendors greater than $25,000. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Management has addressed their corrective action plan in a separately issued letter.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Title: Research and Development CFDA Number: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Other Matters) Criteria or specific requirement: Per Uniform Guidance 2 CFR sections 200.212, 200.318(h) and 180.300, along with 48 CFR section 52.209-6, a non-federal entity must have procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Condition: The University could not produce documentation to show that they performed suspension and debarment verification procedures prior to contracting with the vendors. Questioned costs: None. Context: For 2 of vendors we tested, the University did not maintain documentation to demonstrate that verification procedures were performed prior to contracting with the vendors. However, the University was able to subsequently verify that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Cause: While the University has suspension and debarment procedures in place, they did not document that the check had been completed for these 2 vendors. Effect: If verification procedures are not performed in a timely manner, the University could enter into contracts with vendors who are suspended or debarred and risk noncompliance and/or disallowed costs. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University document suspension and debarment procedures going forward for any aggregate disbursements with vendors greater than $25,000. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Management has addressed their corrective action plan in a separately issued letter.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Title: Research and Development CFDA Number: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Other Matters) Criteria or specific requirement: Per Uniform Guidance 2 CFR sections 200.212, 200.318(h) and 180.300, along with 48 CFR section 52.209-6, a non-federal entity must have procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Condition: The University could not produce documentation to show that they performed suspension and debarment verification procedures prior to contracting with the vendors. Questioned costs: None. Context: For 2 of vendors we tested, the University did not maintain documentation to demonstrate that verification procedures were performed prior to contracting with the vendors. However, the University was able to subsequently verify that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Cause: While the University has suspension and debarment procedures in place, they did not document that the check had been completed for these 2 vendors. Effect: If verification procedures are not performed in a timely manner, the University could enter into contracts with vendors who are suspended or debarred and risk noncompliance and/or disallowed costs. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University document suspension and debarment procedures going forward for any aggregate disbursements with vendors greater than $25,000. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Management has addressed their corrective action plan in a separately issued letter.