Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
56,622
In database
Filtered Results
53,636
Matching current filters
Showing Page
1109 of 2146
25 per page

Filters

Clear
HSEM concurs with the finding. Condition A: NH HSEM Mitigation and Recovery leadership has updated the award letter templates to ensure the necessary information is included as outlined in the condition. Conditions B – D: NH HSEM Mitigation and Recovery leadership updated the Risk Assessment Quic...
HSEM concurs with the finding. Condition A: NH HSEM Mitigation and Recovery leadership has updated the award letter templates to ensure the necessary information is included as outlined in the condition. Conditions B – D: NH HSEM Mitigation and Recovery leadership updated the Risk Assessment Quick Reference Guide (QRG) and Subrecipient monitoring QRG. A two hour in-person training was conducted on January 31, 2024, to Mitigation and Recovery staff which focused on conducting risk assessments and subrecipient monitoring. This will be reviewed with staff again during an upcoming Section meeting in March 2024.
HSEM concurs with the finding. Corrective actions are currently in place to address the accuracy of HSEM’s federal reporting, adding an additional review process prior to submittal. Corrected 425s have already been submitted to FEMA.
HSEM concurs with the finding. Corrective actions are currently in place to address the accuracy of HSEM’s federal reporting, adding an additional review process prior to submittal. Corrected 425s have already been submitted to FEMA.
HSEM concurs with the finding. As a result of the audit, the practice of using individual emails to submit correspondence to FEMA was immediately addressed with staff and future correspondence will only be sent using the general shared email inbox. Regularly during staff meetings employees are remin...
HSEM concurs with the finding. As a result of the audit, the practice of using individual emails to submit correspondence to FEMA was immediately addressed with staff and future correspondence will only be sent using the general shared email inbox. Regularly during staff meetings employees are reminded to copy communications to the general shared inbox. Additionally, HSEM is currently working with the State’s Department of Information and Technology to gain access to prior staff’s emails. To note, the final paragraph in the Conditions section makes an incorrect statement regarding the submittal timeline requirements for Project Completion and Certification reports. PCCs are due within 90 days of project completion, not project obligation.
The department concurs with this finding and plans the following: The NH DDS will have written policies and procedures in place that ensure the validity (non-expired) of medical licenses for providers, as well as the suspension & debarment status of providers. Policies will be in place for pre-hire...
The department concurs with this finding and plans the following: The NH DDS will have written policies and procedures in place that ensure the validity (non-expired) of medical licenses for providers, as well as the suspension & debarment status of providers. Policies will be in place for pre-hire interested parties, as well as more than annual re-reviews. Aside from written policies and procedures, we will develop a spreadsheet to be completed for each individual review done and we will maintain a documents folder to retain electronic proofs in. Proofs will be retained for 6 years. At this time, the Administrator meets with the Professional Relations Officer every two weeks. Discussions and oversight of these policies, procedures, spreadsheet completion and proofs documentation can be done on, before and after these reviews.
(SSA 4513) The department concurs with this finding and plans to work on the following areas to make reviewing and understanding of the reports an easier process: NHDDS will make sure that line 7 on the 4513 report is checked appropriately on all future reporting. NH DDS will update all process d...
(SSA 4513) The department concurs with this finding and plans to work on the following areas to make reviewing and understanding of the reports an easier process: NHDDS will make sure that line 7 on the 4513 report is checked appropriately on all future reporting. NH DDS will update all process directions for all fiscal reporting. For these directions, NH DDS will update all spreadsheets used for reporting purposes, add labels to column headers and link to cells when able for better understanding of our business processes and where amounts are pulled from. NH DDS will keep all backup documentation needed for these directions, to review all current open grant years. NHDDS will create “Mock” documents of each reporting process to help in any further reviews. (SSA 4514) Administrator runs a leave report for a 1-month time frame. Put in alpha order and date order. In an excel spreadsheet, staff are in alpha order. Leave time is added to each individual staff member for a time frame of 3 months (quarterly report). The total for each individual staff member is then populated to a second spread sheet which is broken out by position categories and each position total is then populated to the 4514 report. • On Duty Hours (column A) are the number of days worked in a quarter, times 7.50 hours per day. • Holiday/Leave Hours (column B) are the number of Holidays (7.50 hours per day) during that quarter plus the amount of leave (hours and minutes) per individual staff member during that quarter. • Total Hours (column C) is the amount of column A, plus column B, equals column C. • Total Part-Time Personnel-Is the number of hours the physician worked during that quarter. A report is run in Virtual Time Clock for the quarterly time frame and hours are entered into Part-Time, Medical Consultants (h.) Prior to completing the quarterly report, the excel spread sheet, sheet 2, will be reviewed to ensure cell equations are correct to eliminate formula errors used to calculate quarterly hours. When emailing the Administrator, the quarterly report for signature, the following statement will be in the body of the email to certify cell equations were reviewed prior, to eliminate formula errors: “I certify that I reviewed the SSA-4514 prior to completion, to ensure that cell equations were correct to eliminate formula errors.” Sent to the Administrator for signature then sent off to Region. Sent emails will be saved in an outlook folder for future reference and proofs that reports were sent.
Corrective Action Planned: The identified payments relate to postage expenditures recorded in the Child Support Enforcement Grant. Postage expenditures are controlled in the State's mailing system through mail codes. Agencies send approved postage budgets to the Department of Administrative Service...
Corrective Action Planned: The identified payments relate to postage expenditures recorded in the Child Support Enforcement Grant. Postage expenditures are controlled in the State's mailing system through mail codes. Agencies send approved postage budgets to the Department of Administrative Services (DAS), who then creates a new mail code or adds additional funding to existing codes in the system. All mail processed through the mailing system is charged to these individual mail codes. A monthly expenditure report from the mailing system is interfaced with NH First, and the DAS uploads a journal entry to the general ledger to record these expenditures. The review and approvals for these postage transactions occur upfront at the agency level, not through a NH First approval workflow. DHHS and DAS will work together to document adequate evidence of this upfront review and approval.
View Audit 316627 Questioned Costs: $1
Condition A: DHHS partially concurs. The review of expenditure details is an integral part of DHHS’ Subrecipient Monitoring and standard language is included in the templates for legal agreements. These five subrecipients were deemed low or no risk, examination of expenditure detail is considered ...
Condition A: DHHS partially concurs. The review of expenditure details is an integral part of DHHS’ Subrecipient Monitoring and standard language is included in the templates for legal agreements. These five subrecipients were deemed low or no risk, examination of expenditure detail is considered sufficient monitoring. All five of these subrecipients had the inclusion of the monthly detail requirement in the contracts and this was performed prior to the invoice being submitted to AP for payment. DHHS will re-evaluate current practices to ensure that the documentation is sufficient for the current subrecipient monitoring process. Regarding the two selections identified as having risk assessments which did not specify recommended monitoring procedures: The Risk Assessment Tool for one subrecipient was performed after the subaward award. However, as indicated on the Tool, programmatic monitoring activities were included in the contract. DHHS reviewed the monthly back-up documentation provided with the submitted invoices prior to sending them to AP for payment. The risk assessment tool for the second selection was performed after the subaward award. However, as indicated on the tool, programmatic monitoring activities were included in the contract. We reviewed the monthly back-up documentation provided with the submitted invoices prior to sending them to AP for payment. Condition B: DHHS partially concurs. The review of expenditure details is an integral part of DHHS’ Subrecipient Monitoring and standard language is included in the templates for legal agreements. The subrecipients were deemed low or no risk, therefore, examination of expenditure detail is considered sufficient fiscal monitoring. DHHS employs the review of expenditure details, as allowed under 200.332 (d)(1), as an integral part of the Departments Subrecipient Monitoring. A review of the expenditures provides monitoring for the following concerns: • The familiarity a subrecipient has utilizing Federal funds • The subrecipient management teams’ familiarity with Federal funding • Single Audit findings • Any prior return of funding due to non-compliance • The subrecipient’s compliance with the requirements of 200.300 and 302 • Whether the subrecipient has a new financial system DHHS will re-evaluate the risk response parameters to determine that the level of documentation is sufficient to ensure that the procedures performed would be able to identify noncompliance at the subrecipient level. Condition C: DHHS concurs. DHHS will be updating procedures to include contacting vendors to remind them of the deadline regarding the submission of their single audit in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
The Department underwent turnover and medical issues during the reporting period. The Department has hired additional program staff and arranged for annual training through a federal contractor to assist in reporting requirements. The Department is also in the process of procuring a new weatherizat...
The Department underwent turnover and medical issues during the reporting period. The Department has hired additional program staff and arranged for annual training through a federal contractor to assist in reporting requirements. The Department is also in the process of procuring a new weatherization and fuel assistance system which will assist in providing timely and accurate reporting data. The Department is also reviewing and updating policies and procedures, to include cross training and turnover contingencies.
The Department Concurs with paragraph A – Since this same finding was reported in March of 2023 for FY22, items a, c, and d are now included on all federal subaward contracts and policies have been updated to reflect this. The Department will ensure b is also included going forward. The Department ...
The Department Concurs with paragraph A – Since this same finding was reported in March of 2023 for FY22, items a, c, and d are now included on all federal subaward contracts and policies have been updated to reflect this. The Department will ensure b is also included going forward. The Department concurs with paragraph B - The finding was a result of personnel turnover and medical issues. The Department has hired and trained additional program staff and updated policies to ensure programmatic monitoring and subsequent reports are done in a timely manner. The Department partially concurs with paragraph C. Fiscal monitoring was done for all 3 subrecipients during the federal program year. However, 1 subrecipient monitoring fell outside the state fiscal year so was not covered during the audit period. The Department has changed the wording on its risk assessment procedures to ensure no misinterpretation of the timeframe each subrecipient will be monitored in accordance with its risk assessment. The Department has also changed the requirements of the frequency of fiscal monitoring in each of the risk assessment categories. The Department Concurs with paragraph D – The Department is reviewing policies and procedures and will update them to ensure compliance with 2 CFR section 200.332(a), 2 CFR section 200.332(b) and 2 CFR section 200.521. The Department also created a tracking mechanism to ensure we receive, review, and issue management decisions (if required) in a timely manner. The Department concurs with Paragraph E - The Department is reviewing policies and procedures for both reporting and subrecipient monitoring to ensure data is tested and verified. The Department has already gained increased access to data in current software and is in the process of selecting a vendor for new software that will provide more testing and enhanced internal controls.
The Department concurs with paragraph A that some of the cash draws were not performed in a timely manner. The finding was due to a shortage of trained personnel. The Department is in the process of hiring and training additional personnel and reviewing its policy and procedures on cash draws. Th...
The Department concurs with paragraph A that some of the cash draws were not performed in a timely manner. The finding was due to a shortage of trained personnel. The Department is in the process of hiring and training additional personnel and reviewing its policy and procedures on cash draws. The Department concurs with paragraph B. The Department can show that the subrecipients disburse payments for program advances within a few weeks from original receipt starting with the first check runs to fuel vendors shortly after receiving the advance. However, the Department will work on reviewing its policies and procedures to ensure the Department monitors the subrecipients’ written procedures to minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds and disbursement by the subrecipient. The Department is also creating a tracking method to show the time elapsed when an advance is originally paid to the subrecipient and when it is fully disbursed.
The Department continues to work with its federal partners to ensure timely access to required reports.
The Department continues to work with its federal partners to ensure timely access to required reports.
Corrective Action Planned: The Bureau of Employment Supports has undergone significant programmatic changes over the past 3 years. As part of those changes, our Work Verification Plan was updated and submitted for approval on July 8, 2022. It was approved by the Administration of Children and Famil...
Corrective Action Planned: The Bureau of Employment Supports has undergone significant programmatic changes over the past 3 years. As part of those changes, our Work Verification Plan was updated and submitted for approval on July 8, 2022. It was approved by the Administration of Children and Families on February 9, 2024, making the updates to the NH work verification plan in effect back to July 9, 2022. The audit period in question is from July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2023. Trainings, supports and guidance have taken place throughout that time to correct hour errors such as those identified through this audit. Uploading documents into the e-folder was found to be error prone, therefore, on March 1, 2023, NHEP leadership provided guidance and training on a specific process of indexing and scanning documents to ensure that moving forward the Career Counselors are checking their e-folder’s to ensure that documents are properly uploaded and visible. In addition, a statewide training took place on May 5, 2023, to look in depth at past audit findings, during which, strategies were identified to help alleviate these errors from re-occurring. An additional statewide training also took place on December 15, 2023, which involved discussion around the audit, which was about to begin, including what the general focus of the audit has historically been. As of April 2023, an additional Quality Assurance Specialist was hired to help monitor and support newly hired career counselors in their first year of employment. This additional Specialist has allowed for guidance to be available not only to newly hired staff, but also to seasoned staff throughout the state. The need for an extra layer of training throughout the year for newly hired Career Counselors was identified in the summer of 2023 and the NHEP Leadership Team developed a weekly Quality Assurance meeting. These weekly meetings started August 30, 2023. These meetings provide real time training to review best practices and further career counselors understanding of federal and state policies. The meetings have been successful and are now bi-weekly. As of February 28, 2024, the meetings have been opened to all career counselors throughout the state, not just those under 9 months of employment. The meetings ensure that there is consistent messaging across the state and also provide an opportunity for statewide collaboration between career counselors. Through cursory investigations, we believe that these new supports and processes, have already shown to be effective in improving the accuracy of supporting and recording hours. The last audit yielded 15% discrepancies in hour errors. This audit period had a decrease of 12%, indicating 3% discrepancies in hour errors. NHEP leadership has also been working with the NEW HEIGHTS system to streamline the process of uploading documents to further decrease the potential for errors. A change request form was submitted approximately two years ago. In order to address the audit findings, within the next 90 days, NHEP leadership is holding a statewide mandatory staff training to review the audit process and findings that were identified. During the meeting, in regards to the over reporting hours error, the Leadership Team will reiterate and discuss the importance of uploading documents prior to inputting hours. In regards to the under reporting hours error, the meeting will also include further training about the importance of justification for any differences in hours than what is reported on the activity tracker. Further, that any differences need to be documented in either a sticky note or a RID note. In addition, the Quality Assurance meetings will continue to be held bi-weekly to address issues or trends in the moment. Our continuous transparency will further ensure buy-in from the staff to put systems in place for themselves as well as to increase self-monitoring practices and in turn, decrease errors in the future.
Condition A: DHHS concurs. Pursuant to the Subrecipient Monitoring Policy, the risk assessment and determination of subrecipient monitoring activities is performed during the procurement process with the Grants Administrator and the Program Lead. It is the responsibility of Program to perform the ...
Condition A: DHHS concurs. Pursuant to the Subrecipient Monitoring Policy, the risk assessment and determination of subrecipient monitoring activities is performed during the procurement process with the Grants Administrator and the Program Lead. It is the responsibility of Program to perform the requested subrecipient monitoring. The Department provides annual training on the Subrecipient Monitoring Policy. We will reinforce the requirements of the Policy and the ramifications for the Department for the non-compliance in this year’s annual training. Regarding the incomplete Risk Assessment Tool, we will update the Subrecipient Monitoring Policy to include a secondary review of the Tool prior to implementation, as part of our internal controls. Condition B: DHHS does not concur. The Department employs the review of expenditure details, as allowed under 200.332 (d)(1), as an integral part of the Departments Subrecipient Monitoring. The Department’s review of the expenditures provides monitoring for the following concerns: • The familiarity a subrecipient has utilizing Federal funds • The subrecipient management teams’ familiarity with Federal funding • Single Audit findings • Any prior return of funding due to non-compliance • The subrecipient’s compliance with the requirements of 200.300 and 302 • Whether the subrecipient has a new financial system Standard language for the submission of expenditure detail is included in all templates for legal agreements. These subrecipients were deemed low or no risk, therefore, examination of expenditure detail is considered sufficient monitoring. Subrecipient monitoring activities are memorialized in the legal agreements. The Risk Assessment Tool provides a space for the monitoring activities to be selected, however, the Subrecipient Monitoring Policy does require the memorialization of the activities on the Tool for compliance, only to be memorialized in the legal agreement. Condition C DHHS partially concurs. As the subrecipient’s audit report had no findings, we are not required to issue a management decision letter. However, we will be updating our procedures to include contacting the vendors to remind them of the deadline regarding the submission of their single audit in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
This function (FFATA reporting) has now been designated to our Federal Reporting Group, which will allow for redundancy in personnel. A new policy and procedure, which will include internal controls, will be developed and implemented.
This function (FFATA reporting) has now been designated to our Federal Reporting Group, which will allow for redundancy in personnel. A new policy and procedure, which will include internal controls, will be developed and implemented.
NHED concurs with the finding identified with the expenditures of $3605. The NHED will have the LEA’s submitting for indirect costs after September 30th upload an invoice and back up documentation into GMS. The NHED concurs with the findings identified with expenditures of $5,172. There were i...
NHED concurs with the finding identified with the expenditures of $3605. The NHED will have the LEA’s submitting for indirect costs after September 30th upload an invoice and back up documentation into GMS. The NHED concurs with the findings identified with expenditures of $5,172. There were in fact some items that were charged outside the period of performance. This happened prior to us receiving the FY22 audit finding and putting in place new controls to prevent. We have since put into place DOE-OBM-33 to ensure payments are being reviewed closely to the period of performance at multiple times. We have also corrected any items charged to the wrong CAN. The NHED concurs with the findings identified with expenditures of $816. We will look into the district returning these funds or other enforcement actions. In addition to the DOE-OBM-033 process, the Division of Learner Support has created and implemented a transfer of funds procedure.
View Audit 316627 Questioned Costs: $1
The Office of ESEA Title programs and Covid-19 education programs have established an internal process to sample and test reports compiled to ensure operations are executed as intended. These internal controls include a monthly reporting sign off Excel sheet, certification on each FFATA submission a...
The Office of ESEA Title programs and Covid-19 education programs have established an internal process to sample and test reports compiled to ensure operations are executed as intended. These internal controls include a monthly reporting sign off Excel sheet, certification on each FFATA submission and a secondary certification for accuracy verification, and a division wide process for FFATA filing and verification. Division wide training occurred on October 26, 2023. Due to grant award notification (GAN) changes and development within our grants management system (GMS), the FFATA process has also been developing and shifting; therefore the FFATA process will be revisited annually and updated as needed. A revised procedure for FFATA reporting will be completed prior to additional training being offered. To ensure that processes are being followed, newly hired staff is trained appropriately, and updates to the GAN process are considered within the FFATA process we will hold another training this spring, March 14th, 2024, prior to new subawards being issued.
Corrective Action Planned: The Office of ESEA Title Programs’ accountant identified when the miscalculation first took place in 2021-2022 and made changes to the workbook formula to correctly calculate the LEA allocations. The office administrator and the bureau administrator both thoroughly review...
Corrective Action Planned: The Office of ESEA Title Programs’ accountant identified when the miscalculation first took place in 2021-2022 and made changes to the workbook formula to correctly calculate the LEA allocations. The office administrator and the bureau administrator both thoroughly reviewed the Title I, Part A allocation workbooks and relayed questions, comments and concerns to the accountant, to ensure compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. This three-step review ensures that formulas are executed as required under Title I, Part A legislation. As a part of the corrective action plan, the Office intends to establish internal controls that ensure the three-step review will take place annually prior to awarding allocations to LEAs. Each level of review will be passed forward via email documenting that the allocation review has taken place and allocations are approved, in order of; 1. Accountant, 2. Office Administrator, 3. Bureau Administrator. Once all three reviews are completed and approved via the same email chain, the email will be saved on the department’s common drive for auditing purposes.
BEA will evaluate existing internal controls in place to ensure that the precision level of the control is such that it would detect an error in the expenditures reported in comparison to the expenditures incurred within the general ledger, account for precision level control when changing guidance ...
BEA will evaluate existing internal controls in place to ensure that the precision level of the control is such that it would detect an error in the expenditures reported in comparison to the expenditures incurred within the general ledger, account for precision level control when changing guidance exists, and that all documentation used to support the amounts reported on the federal report are properly maintained. Condition A has been completed. In January 2024, BEA evaluated internal controls related to the review and approval of expenditures. The following additional reconciliation step was added to the processes of preparation of expenditure draws and reporting preparation: • Broadband program Accountant II performs a data extract from NHFirst and reconciles the drawdown calculation totals as well as “dashboard” reporting totals to the NHFirst data extract to confirm accuracy of all data points. This second data validation step has been added to ensure all expenditures recorded in NHFirst are evaluated against program guidelines, submitted for reimbursement and included on required reports. Condition B & C to be completed no later than 12/31/2024.
Corrective Action Planned (Condition A): The DAS analyzed the six items erroneously reported as subawards and noted the errors were isolated to two specific agencies, the Department of Health and Human Services and the Department of Environmental Services. In response to the prior year finding 20...
Corrective Action Planned (Condition A): The DAS analyzed the six items erroneously reported as subawards and noted the errors were isolated to two specific agencies, the Department of Health and Human Services and the Department of Environmental Services. In response to the prior year finding 2022-002, the DAS had strengthened internal controls related to the review and validation of amounts reported by individual state agencies as pass through expenditures. This included an additional control specifically verifying SLFRF pass through expenditures reported by each agency. The DAS will offer additional training relative to identification and reporting of subaward expenditures in its annual statewide Single Audit training and re-evaluate the precision of execution of controls over the validation of pass through reporting in assembling the SEFA for fiscal year 2024. Corrective Action Planned (Conditions B through E): The State largely concurs with the findings and recommendations and has implemented procedures to address the identified conditions already or will do so. With regards to condition B, The State will work with the individual agencies to ensure that individual agencies entering into such agreements clearly indicate the terms required by Uniform Guidance, including permitted indirect cost rates and whether the award is for R&D. The State has already begun this corrective action plan with the agencies. With regards to condition C, for a. and b. for payments by agencies, there are standard procedures for review and authorization of invoices and payments and those payments are documented. For c. The State has already implemented an agency wide framework for subrecipient monitoring. The State will provide re-training for those agencies that had not properly documented monitoring as outlined by the subrecipient risk assessments and ensure monitoring reports are documented. With regards to condition D, The State has already implemented an agency wide framework to help ensure policies and procedures are in place concerning Uniform Guidance Reports. We will work those agencies that had not documented the date received and the review of the Uniform Guidance Reports to ensure written documentation occurs. Where findings have been reported in the Uniform Guidance Report, ensure timely Management Letters are documented and provided with the summary review of Uniform Guidance Report.
Corrective Action Planned (Condition A): The DAS would note the definition of a subaward per 2 CFR 200.1 specifies a subaward may be provided through any form of legal agreement, including an agreement that the pass-through entity considers a contract. State procurement policies require contracts,...
Corrective Action Planned (Condition A): The DAS would note the definition of a subaward per 2 CFR 200.1 specifies a subaward may be provided through any form of legal agreement, including an agreement that the pass-through entity considers a contract. State procurement policies require contracts, including contracts deemed subawards, greater than $10,000 are subject to legislative and executive branch approval prior to final execution. The resulting contracts are managed within the State’s financial system using purchase orders which in turn encumber funds. To support the testing of procurements, the State provided a detailed listing of purchase orders initiated during the audit period and in doing so clearly expressed the resulting population would include contracts considered subawards. Accordingly, the State deems the portion of selections identified as subawards to be reasonable and appropriate given the population sampled. However, the DAS will re-evaluate the precision of execution of controls over the validation of the subrecipient population in fiscal year 2024. Corrective Action Planned (Condition B): The State concurs with the findings and recommendations and has implemented procedures to address the identified conditions already or will do so. With regards to condition B, The State will work with the individual agencies to ensure that individual agencies maintain and document the search of SAM.gov for suspension and debarment.
In order to meet the segregation of duties, the Department will explore the need to create a position to ensure requisite segregation of duties requirements. With regard to the segregation of duties, the SF-270 is required form that DMAVS submits to the National Guard Appendix Program Manager for re...
In order to meet the segregation of duties, the Department will explore the need to create a position to ensure requisite segregation of duties requirements. With regard to the segregation of duties, the SF-270 is required form that DMAVS submits to the National Guard Appendix Program Manager for reimbursement with all back up documentation. The National Guard Appendix Program Manager, National Guard Grants Officer Representative, and National Guard United States Property Fiscal Officer (USPFO)/controller located in Concord, NH review, sign and submit the form to the Department of Defense on behalf of DMAVS to request the cash draw. Prior to the submission of reimbursement of any funds, each billing and invoice is reviewed, entered into a ledger and reconciled by three members of the accounting team. Once reconciled, the SF-270 is prepared and signed by the Financial Administrator. The SF-270 is then submitted to the appendix program manager for concurrence and then to the federal fiscal agent (USPFO) for approval. No funds are drawn down until approved by the USPFO. If this is not a satisfactory level of review, the department will request a new position to ensure that there the business function has the proper level of staffing to meet the requirements for segregation of duties.
For clarity the Department will create a redundant manual ledger that duplicates the functions of the current ledger and Detailed Transaction Register (DTR). DMAVS has existing policies and procedures in place to track all federal funds, state funds and mixed funds, and uses spreadsheets for all tr...
For clarity the Department will create a redundant manual ledger that duplicates the functions of the current ledger and Detailed Transaction Register (DTR). DMAVS has existing policies and procedures in place to track all federal funds, state funds and mixed funds, and uses spreadsheets for all transactions that reconciles every month to NH First Detail Transaction Register (DTR), Federal Fund tracking sheet, and Federal reimbursement tracking sheet with backup documents. The tracking sheet for the federal register is not intended to account for the state share of billing. The state share is accurately accounted for in the DTR, the cumulative accounting in the SF-270 and associated back up documentation. Supporting documentation to substantiate the accuracy of lines a, c, e, and f is in the DTR, the cumulative accounting of each SF-270, the supporting documentation sent with the billing to the Federal Government, and Year-end Agency Report for Federal Awards. This includes reconciliation and analysis of SADB expenditures and revenues to the Statement of Appropriations by each Program Accounting Unit. The SF-270 form is continuous cumulative data that starts Oct 1st and runs through the end of that Federal Fiscal Year. The SF-270 is the required federal form DMAVS submits to the Federal National Guard Appendix Program Manager for reimbursement. Back up documentation is submitted with the SF-270. The National Guard Appendix Program Manager, National Guard Grants Officer Representative, and National Guard United States Property Fiscal Officer (USPFO)/controller located in Concord, NH review, sign and submit the form to the Department of Defense to affect the cash draw. DMAVS does not unilaterally make cash draws to the federal government. The USPFO, who is substantially involved provides an independent review and reconciles any discrepancies prior to approving any requests for reimbursement. One possible explanation for the finding is that the selected test works were not continuous.
We are updating our policy and reviewing with staff. Updates include adding verbiage that nominal fees may be waived as a hardship adjustment (NOMWV), and that self-pay provider office visit charges will be reviewed case-by-case and adjusted as a self-pay/hardship discount. We added the following ...
We are updating our policy and reviewing with staff. Updates include adding verbiage that nominal fees may be waived as a hardship adjustment (NOMWV), and that self-pay provider office visit charges will be reviewed case-by-case and adjusted as a self-pay/hardship discount. We added the following adjustment codes: o NOI No Income Adjustment - will use when patient has completed Statement of No Income. o NOMWV Nominal Fee Waiver Adjustment - will use when patient cannot pay nominal fee. Reviewed case-by-case basis. Billing ran reports for 2024 and will correct any Nominal Fee waivers, No Income Adjustments, or sliding fee office visit charges so that they align with this corrective action. Everything will be put into place by September 30, 2024 by Winter Paoletto.
Name of contact person: Renae Alston Corrective Action: The County will continue to train employees on a monthly basis and as needed when new and updated policies are received. Supervisors and lead workers will continue to conduct second party reviews and utilizing any findings to aid in training st...
Name of contact person: Renae Alston Corrective Action: The County will continue to train employees on a monthly basis and as needed when new and updated policies are received. Supervisors and lead workers will continue to conduct second party reviews and utilizing any findings to aid in training staff on any necessary policy information. The department will continue to implement changes as necessary to achieve the overall improvement of eligibility determinations. Proposed Completion Date: June 30, 2024
« 1 1107 1108 1110 1111 2146 »