Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
48,628
In database
Filtered Results
7,124
Matching current filters
Showing Page
16 of 285
25 per page

Filters

Clear
Active filters: Questioned Costs
Finding 1155927 (2024-004)
Material Weakness 2024
2. In four (4) instances out of four (4) tenant files tested, the HUD Form 50059 was not signed until January of 2025. The effective move out dates occurred, during the 2024 calendar year.
2. In four (4) instances out of four (4) tenant files tested, the HUD Form 50059 was not signed until January of 2025. The effective move out dates occurred, during the 2024 calendar year.
View Audit 368350 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 1155927 (2024-004)
Material Weakness 2024
3. In one (1) instance out of four (4) tenant files tested, the move out inspection report was dated February 3, 2025. The effective move date was November 18, 2024.
3. In one (1) instance out of four (4) tenant files tested, the move out inspection report was dated February 3, 2025. The effective move date was November 18, 2024.
View Audit 368350 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 1155927 (2024-004)
Material Weakness 2024
4. In one (1) instance out of four (4) tenant files tested, there was no supporting documentation, indicating that the return of the tenant’s security deposit was issued within 30 days of the effective move out date.
4. In one (1) instance out of four (4) tenant files tested, there was no supporting documentation, indicating that the return of the tenant’s security deposit was issued within 30 days of the effective move out date.
View Audit 368350 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 1155927 (2024-004)
Material Weakness 2024
Comments on the Finding and Each Recommendation. Management concurs with the finding and the auditor’s recommendation that Alpha Tower should process applicants and tenants, including recertification of tenants in accordance with guidelines established by the Department of Housing and Urban Developm...
Comments on the Finding and Each Recommendation. Management concurs with the finding and the auditor’s recommendation that Alpha Tower should process applicants and tenants, including recertification of tenants in accordance with guidelines established by the Department of Housing and Urban Development prior to the tenant occupying the unit. By performing these procedures, the risk of incurring questioned costs will be significantly reduced.
View Audit 368350 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 1155927 (2024-004)
Material Weakness 2024
Actions Taken on the Finding.
Actions Taken on the Finding.
View Audit 368350 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 1155927 (2024-004)
Material Weakness 2024
Corrected going forward and reviewing discrepancies.
Corrected going forward and reviewing discrepancies.
View Audit 368350 Questioned Costs: $1
Tenant Files
Tenant Files
View Audit 368348 Questioned Costs: $1
Condition:
Condition:
View Audit 368348 Questioned Costs: $1
Recertification:
Recertification:
View Audit 368348 Questioned Costs: $1
1. There was one (1) instance out of seventeen (17) tenant files selected for testing, whereby the annual recertification was not performed.
1. There was one (1) instance out of seventeen (17) tenant files selected for testing, whereby the annual recertification was not performed.
View Audit 368348 Questioned Costs: $1
2. In ten (10) instances out of sixteen (16) tenant files tested, the HUD-EIV was not maintained in the tenant’s file.
2. In ten (10) instances out of sixteen (16) tenant files tested, the HUD-EIV was not maintained in the tenant’s file.
View Audit 368348 Questioned Costs: $1
3. In one (1) instance out of sixteen (16) tenant files tested, the Notice and Consent for the Release of Information (Form 9887) was not dated by the tenant.
3. In one (1) instance out of sixteen (16) tenant files tested, the Notice and Consent for the Release of Information (Form 9887) was not dated by the tenant.
View Audit 368348 Questioned Costs: $1
4. In three (3) instances out of sixteen (16) tenant files tested, the housing quality inspection report was not maintained in the tenant’s file.
4. In three (3) instances out of sixteen (16) tenant files tested, the housing quality inspection report was not maintained in the tenant’s file.
View Audit 368348 Questioned Costs: $1
5. In one (1) instance out of sixteen (16) tenant files tested, the quality assurance information form was not maintained in the tenant’s file.
5. In one (1) instance out of sixteen (16) tenant files tested, the quality assurance information form was not maintained in the tenant’s file.
View Audit 368348 Questioned Costs: $1
6. In two (2) instances out of sixteen (16) tenant files tested, the annual recertification letter was not maintained in the tenant’s file.
6. In two (2) instances out of sixteen (16) tenant files tested, the annual recertification letter was not maintained in the tenant’s file.
View Audit 368348 Questioned Costs: $1
7. In one (1) instance out of sixteen (16) tenant files tested, the lease addendum for violence against women was not maintained in the tenant’s file.
7. In one (1) instance out of sixteen (16) tenant files tested, the lease addendum for violence against women was not maintained in the tenant’s file.
View Audit 368348 Questioned Costs: $1
8. In two (2) instances out of sixteen (16) tenant files tested, the effective date on the Notification of Rent Increase resulting from Recertification Processing – Section 202/8 or 202 PACs form, did agree to the effective date on the HUD Form-50059.
8. In two (2) instances out of sixteen (16) tenant files tested, the effective date on the Notification of Rent Increase resulting from Recertification Processing – Section 202/8 or 202 PACs form, did agree to the effective date on the HUD Form-50059.
View Audit 368348 Questioned Costs: $1
9. In two (2) instances out of sixteen (16) tenant files tested, the rent amount indicated on the Notification of Rent Increase resulting from Recertification Processing – Section 202/8 or 202 PACs form, did agree to the total tenant payment on the HUD Form-50059.
9. In two (2) instances out of sixteen (16) tenant files tested, the rent amount indicated on the Notification of Rent Increase resulting from Recertification Processing – Section 202/8 or 202 PACs form, did agree to the total tenant payment on the HUD Form-50059.
View Audit 368348 Questioned Costs: $1
10. In one (1) instance out of sixteen (16) tenant files tested, the employment income reported on HUD Form-50059 was properly calculated based on the supporting documentation maintained in the tenant’s file.
10. In one (1) instance out of sixteen (16) tenant files tested, the employment income reported on HUD Form-50059 was properly calculated based on the supporting documentation maintained in the tenant’s file.
View Audit 368348 Questioned Costs: $1
Move-outs:
Move-outs:
View Audit 368348 Questioned Costs: $1
1. There was one (1) tenant file selected for testing, the tenant file could not be located.
1. There was one (1) tenant file selected for testing, the tenant file could not be located.
View Audit 368348 Questioned Costs: $1
Comments on the Finding and Each Recommendation. Management concurs with the finding and the auditor’s recommendation that Ridgeview Terrace, Inc. should process applicants and tenants, including recertification of tenants in accordance with guidelines established by the Department of Housing and Ur...
Comments on the Finding and Each Recommendation. Management concurs with the finding and the auditor’s recommendation that Ridgeview Terrace, Inc. should process applicants and tenants, including recertification of tenants in accordance with guidelines established by the Department of Housing and Urban Development prior to the tenant occupying the unit. In addition, a tenant file should be maintained for each move-out tenant. By performing these procedures, the risk of incurring questioned costs will be significantly reduced.
View Audit 368348 Questioned Costs: $1
Actions Taken on the Finding.
Actions Taken on the Finding.
View Audit 368348 Questioned Costs: $1
Correcting going forward.
Correcting going forward.
View Audit 368348 Questioned Costs: $1
Audit Finding Item 2024-001 Corrective Action Taken: In response to this finding, Tulsa Cares is developing and will formally adopt written procurement policies and procedures in alignment with the requirements outlined in 2 CFR 200.318(a). These policies will establish standards of conduct, ensure ...
Audit Finding Item 2024-001 Corrective Action Taken: In response to this finding, Tulsa Cares is developing and will formally adopt written procurement policies and procedures in alignment with the requirements outlined in 2 CFR 200.318(a). These policies will establish standards of conduct, ensure full and open competition, and provide clear guidance for the procurement of goods and services under federal awards. This corrective action will be completed by the next board meeting, scheduled for December 4, 2025. Responsible Party: Natalie Jarred, Chief Financial and Administrative Officer, is responsible for monitoring compliance with procurement policies and updating them as necessary.
View Audit 368292 Questioned Costs: $1
« 1 14 15 17 18 285 »