Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
61,491
In database
Filtered Results
23,815
Matching current filters
Showing Page
157 of 953
25 per page

Filters

Clear
Active filters: Questioned Costs
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Material Weakness in Internal Controls over Compliance and Material Noncompliance: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Recommendation: CLA recommends the Alliance to develop the procurement policy compliance in with Uniform Guidance, including such docu...
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Material Weakness in Internal Controls over Compliance and Material Noncompliance: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Recommendation: CLA recommends the Alliance to develop the procurement policy compliance in with Uniform Guidance, including such documentation as the procurement threshold of the transaction, price comparisons and analyses made, bids obtained, proof of any limited competition, dated vendor screenings and signed authorization of the appropriate program personnel. CLA also recommends emphasizing the importance of the procurement standards and established policy to all authorized purchasers within the Alliance. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: HIV Alliance updated our Procurement Policy to comply with the federal guidance using the recommendation provided by CLA. The Board of Directors voted toapprove the updated Procurement Policy in June of 2025 and we implemented the updated policy on July 1, 2025. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Wayne Hamblin, Finance Director Planned completion date for corrective action plan: July 1, 2025
View Audit 373559 Questioned Costs: $1
Policy and Procedure on coordination and reconciliation
Policy and Procedure on coordination and reconciliation
Management Response: Feeding South Florida complied with LFPA contract provisions for food purchases by meeting and invoicing the required food purchase minimum. Freight was an allowable cost for the contract. Despite miscategorizing 5 freight invoices, Feeding South Florida complied with the LFPA c...
Management Response: Feeding South Florida complied with LFPA contract provisions for food purchases by meeting and invoicing the required food purchase minimum. Freight was an allowable cost for the contract. Despite miscategorizing 5 freight invoices, Feeding South Florida complied with the LFPA contract for freight by meeting and invoicing the total amount allowable for freight. To ensure ongoing compliance, we established and implemented a comprehensive Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for all contracts and grants, including the LFPA program, which has been consistently followed since LFPA Plus began. To strengthen oversight and enhance audit readiness, administrative responsibility for this contract has transitioned from the Grants Department to the Finance Department. This restructuring reinforces our compliance framework, improves operational support, and embeds stronger accountability measures across all organizational levels and throughout our region.
View Audit 373471 Questioned Costs: $1
Name of Auditee: Town of Vestal, New York Name of Audit Firm: EFPR Group, CPAs, PLLC Period Covered by the Audit: Year ended December 31, 2024 CAP Prepared by: Rajat Saha, Town Comptroller Phone: (607) 748-1514 (2) Audit Finding 2024-002 - The Town did not submit its audited financial information fo...
Name of Auditee: Town of Vestal, New York Name of Audit Firm: EFPR Group, CPAs, PLLC Period Covered by the Audit: Year ended December 31, 2024 CAP Prepared by: Rajat Saha, Town Comptroller Phone: (607) 748-1514 (2) Audit Finding 2024-002 - The Town did not submit its audited financial information for the year ended December 31, 2024, to the FAC by the required deadlines. (a) Implementation Plan of Actions - The Town will reconcile its balance sheet accounts at year-end. (b) Implementation Date - This will be implemented for the year ending December 31, 2025. (c) Persons Responsible for Implementation - The Comptroller and the Town Board.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Titles: Moving to Work Demonstration Program - Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers & Housing Voucher Cluster Federal Assistance Listing Numbers: 14.881, 14.871, 14.879, 14.EHV Noncompliance – N. Special Tests and Provisio...
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Titles: Moving to Work Demonstration Program - Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers & Housing Voucher Cluster Federal Assistance Listing Numbers: 14.881, 14.871, 14.879, 14.EHV Noncompliance – N. Special Tests and Provisions – HQS Inspections Non Compliance Material to the Financial Statements: No Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance for Special Tests and Provisions Criteria: HQS Inspections. Per the Authority's HCV Admin Plan, the PHA must inspect the unit leased to a family at least biennially to determine if the unit meets HQS standards and the PHA must conduct quality control re-inspections. The PHA must prepare a unit inspection report (24 CFR sections 982.158(d) and 982.405(b)). These inspection reports are required to be maintained and available for examination at the time of audit. Condition: Based upon inspection of the Authority’s files and on discussion with management there were inspection reports that were unavailable for examination at the time of audit. Context: Of a sample size of thirty-six (36) units in the Moving to Work Demonstration Program - Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers, one (1) unit did not have a biennial HQS inspection performed. Of a sample size of fifteen (15) units in the Housing Voucher Cluster, three (3) units did not have a have a biennial HQS inspection performed. Our sample size is statistically valid. Known Questioned Costs: Moving to Work Demonstration Program - Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program: $4,000 Housing Voucher Cluster: $9,268 Cause: There is a significant deficiency in internal controls over the compliance for the special tests and provisions type of compliance related to HQS inspections. The Authority has not properly considered, designed, implemented, maintained and monitored a system of internal controls that assures the program is in compliance. Effect: The Moving to Work Demonstration - Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program and Housing Voucher Cluster are in non-compliance with the special tests and provisions type of compliance related to HQS inspections. Auditors' Recommendation: We recommend the Authority design and implement internal control procedures that will reasonably assure compliance with the Uniform Guidance and the compliance supplement related to HQS inspections. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Actions: The Authority has recognized the significant deficiency in the Moving to Work Demonstration - Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program and Housing Voucher Cluster and will implement internal control procedures that will ensure compliance with federal regulations. Noelle Tackett, Director of the Housing Choice Voucher Program, will be responsible to implement this corrective action by December 31, 2025.
View Audit 373324 Questioned Costs: $1
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Titles: Moving to Work Demonstration Program - Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers & Housing Voucher Cluster Federal Assistance Listing Numbers: 14.881, 14.871, 14.879, 14.EHV Noncompliance – E. Eligibility – Tenant Files...
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Titles: Moving to Work Demonstration Program - Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers & Housing Voucher Cluster Federal Assistance Listing Numbers: 14.881, 14.871, 14.879, 14.EHV Noncompliance – E. Eligibility – Tenant Files Non Compliance Material to the Financial Statements: Yes Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance for Eligibility Criteria: Tenant Files. The PHA must do the following: As a condition of admission or continued occupancy, require the tenant and other family member to provide necessary information, documentation, and releases for the PHA to verify income eligibility (24 CFR sections 5.230, 5.609, and 982.516). These files are required to be maintained and available for examination at the time of audit. Condition: Based upon inspection of the Authority’s files and on discussion with management, there were documents that were unavailable for examination at the time of audit. Context: Moving to Work Demonstration Program - Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program: There are approximately 2,556 units. Of a sample size of thirty-six (36) tenant files, the following information was unavailable for examination at the time of audit: • Original application was missing in three (3) files • HUD-9887 form was missing in two (2) files • Lead based paint form was missing in one (1) file • Signed lease was missing in four (4) files • Verification of income was missing in two (2) files Housing Voucher Cluster: There are approximately 347 units. Of a sample size of fifteen (15) tenant files, the following information was unavailable for examination at the time of audit: • Citizenship declaration form was missing in one (1) file • Signed lease was missing in one (1) files • Verification of income was missing in two (2) files Our sample size is statistically valid. Known Questioned Costs: Moving to Work Demonstration Program - Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program: $21,643 Housing Voucher Cluster: $34,166 Cause: There is a material weakness in internal controls over the compliance in the Moving to Work Demonstration - Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program and Housing Voucher Cluster for the eligibility type of compliance related to the maintenance of tenant files. The Authority has not properly considered, designed, implemented, maintained and monitored a system of internal controls that assures the program is in compliance. Effect: The Moving to Work Demonstration - Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program and Housing Voucher Cluster are in material non-compliance with the eligibility type of compliance related to the maintenance of tenant files. Auditors' Recommendation: We recommend the Authority design and implement internal control procedures that will assure compliance with the Uniform Guidance and the compliance supplement related to eligibility requirements. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Actions: The Authority accepts the recommendation of the auditor on the inspection of tenant files and has made arrangements to comply with the Moving to Work Demonstration - Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program and Housing Voucher Cluster. Noelle Tackett, Director of the Housing Choice Voucher Program, will be responsible to implement this corrective action by December 31, 2025.
View Audit 373324 Questioned Costs: $1
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Titles: Moving to Work Demonstration Program - Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers & Housing Voucher Cluster Federal Assistance Listing Numbers: 14.881, 14.871, 14.879, 14.EHV Noncompliance – N. Special Tests and Provisio...
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Titles: Moving to Work Demonstration Program - Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers & Housing Voucher Cluster Federal Assistance Listing Numbers: 14.881, 14.871, 14.879, 14.EHV Noncompliance – N. Special Tests and Provisions – Housing Quality Standards (HQS) & HQS Enforcement Non Compliance Material to the Financial Statements: Yes Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance for Special Tests and Provisions Criteria: HQS & HQS Enforcement. For units under HAP contract that fail to meet HQS, the PHA must require the owner to correct all life threatening HQS deficiencies within 24 hours after the inspections and all other deficiencies within 30 days or within a specified PHA-approved extension. Condition: Based upon inspection of the Authority’s files and on discussion with management, the Authority did not properly abate or provide proper extension documentation for failed inspections selected for testing. In addition, there were inspection reports that were unavailable for examination at the time of audit. Context: The Authority did not properly abate thirteen (13) out of twenty-five (25) annual failed inspections selected for testing in the Moving to Work Demonstration Program - Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program. As a result, the Authority was not in compliance with the HQS as required by 24 CFR sections 982.158(d) and 982.405(b). The Authority did not properly abate one (1) out of two (2) annual failed inspections selected for testing in the Housing Voucher Cluster. Additionally, the Authority was unable to provide inspection reports for 2 (two) out of 2 (two) failed inspections selected for testing, therefore we were unable to determine if the unit passed reinspection within the required time in the Housing Voucher Cluster. As a result, the Authority was not in compliance with the HQS as required by 24 CFR sections 982.158(d) and 982.405(b). Known Questioned Costs: Moving to Work Demonstration Program - Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program: $22,500 Housing Voucher Cluster: $6,940 Cause: There is a material weakness in internal controls over the compliance in the Moving to Work Demonstration - Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program and the Housing Voucher Cluster for the special tests and provisions type of compliance related to HQS enforcement. The Authority has not properly considered, designed, implemented, maintained and monitored a system of internal controls that assures the program is in compliance. Effect: The Moving to Work Demonstration - Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program and Housing Voucher Cluster are in material non-compliance with the special tests and provisions type of compliance related to HQS enforcement. Auditors' Recommendation: We recommend the Authority design and implement internal control procedures that will reasonably assure compliance with the Uniform Guidance and the compliance supplement related to HQS enforcement. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Actions: The Authority accepts the recommendation of the auditor regarding HQS inspections and has made arrangements to comply with the Moving to Work Demonstration - Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers program. Noelle Tackett, Director of the Housing Choice Voucher Program, will be responsible to implement this corrective action by December 31, 2025.
View Audit 373324 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 2024-004 Repeat Finding 2023-005 ALNo.: Program Title: Federal Agency: Pass-Through Agencies: Award Number/Year 93.667 Social Services Block Grant U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Wisconsin Department of Children and Families and Wisconsin Department of Health Services 561,3561,3...
Finding 2024-004 Repeat Finding 2023-005 ALNo.: Program Title: Federal Agency: Pass-Through Agencies: Award Number/Year 93.667 Social Services Block Grant U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Wisconsin Department of Children and Families and Wisconsin Department of Health Services 561,3561,3681 /2023 Criteria: The Uniform Guidance requires that local entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with laws, regulations and program compliance requirements. The Uniform Guidance further requires auditors to obtain an understanding of the local entity's internal control over federal programs. To minimize the risks of errors, internal controls should be in place for all program compliance requirements, including the approval and submission of reports by appropriate individuals. Condition/Context: There were 13 reports for submission for UCS and 26 reports for the County. Nine reports were selected for testing. There was no documentation of a review control by someone independent of the preparer for all nine reports tested. Our sample was not statistically valid. Cause: The County did not have procedures in place requiring an independent person to review the reports before submission. Questioned Costs: None noted. Effect: Due to a lack of controls it was noted that the County did not capture the full value of their contract which resulted in a possible loss of approximately $174,350 in funding. Other reports without review could contain errors. Recommendation: We recommend that the County implement procedures for management to review reports required to be completed under the grant prior to submission. Corrective Action Planned: Angela Runde and Cody Blindert continued to work on the development of the Grant Manager module of Tyler MUNIS. In 2025 it was reviewed with the Department Heads, Kessa Klaas, Cece Fink and Lori Reid as to their responsibility to review each filing for completeness and accuracy before filing. Patrick Montgomery will review before final submission. Anticipated Completion Date 3/1/2026.
Finding 2024-008 Repeat Finding 2023-009 ALNo.: Program Title: Federal Agency: Pass-Through Agencies: Award Number/Year 93.658 Foster Care - Title IV-E U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Wisconsin Department of Children and Families 3413,3561,3681,3645/2024 Criteria: The Uniform Guidance a...
Finding 2024-008 Repeat Finding 2023-009 ALNo.: Program Title: Federal Agency: Pass-Through Agencies: Award Number/Year 93.658 Foster Care - Title IV-E U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Wisconsin Department of Children and Families 3413,3561,3681,3645/2024 Criteria: The Uniform Guidance and State Single Audit Guidelines require that local entities receiving federal and state awards establish and maintain internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with laws, regulations and program compliance requirements. The Uniform Guidance and State Single Audit Guidelines further require auditors to obtain an understanding of the local entity's internal control over federal and state programs. To minimize the risk of errors, internal controls should be in place for all program compliance requirements, including the preparation and submission of monthly reports, which should be reviewed and approved by a responsible party other than the original preparer. Condition/Context: There were 13 reports for submission for the County. Three reports were selected for testing. There was no documentation of a review control by someone independent of the preparer for all three reports tested. Our sample was not statistically valid. Cause: The County did not have procedures in place requiring an independent person to review the reports before submission. Questioned Costs: None noted. Effect: Reports that contain errors could be submitted. Recommendation: We recommend that an employee other than the preparer review all reports before they are submitted to grantors. Corrective Action Planned: Angela Runde and Cody Blindert continued to work on the development of the Grant Manager module of Tyler MUNIS. In 2025 it was reviewed with the Department Heads, Kessa Klaas, CeCe Fink, Lori Reid and Jessica Munson as to their responsibility to review each filing for completeness and accuracy before filing. Cece Fink has designated that one person pull the information and compile the report. The workflow will route the report to Cece Fink for review and then to Patrick Montgomery for final review and approval. Anticipated Completion Date 3/1/2026.
Finding 2024-003 Repeat Finding 2023-004 ALNo.: Program Title: Federal Agency: Award Number/Year: 21.027 COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds U.S. Department of Treasury 1505-027 l / 2021 Criteria: The Uniform Guidance requires that local entities receiving federal awards estab...
Finding 2024-003 Repeat Finding 2023-004 ALNo.: Program Title: Federal Agency: Award Number/Year: 21.027 COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds U.S. Department of Treasury 1505-027 l / 2021 Criteria: The Uniform Guidance requires that local entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. The Uniform Guidance further requires auditors to obtain an understanding of the local entity's internal control over federal programs. To minimize the risk of errors, internal controls should be in place for all program compliance requirements, including the approval ofreports by a knowledgeable individual. Condition/Context: The County does not have controls in place to ensure there is documentation of the approval/review of reports prior to submission. The annual report selected for testing did not have documentation ofreview and/or approval. The sample was not statistically valid. Cause: The County did not have internal control procedures in place requiring an independent person to document their review of the reports before submission. Questioned Costs: None noted. Effect: Costs for activities that are specifically not allowed or are prohibited by the federal statutes, regulations, or the terms and conditions of the federal award could be processed under the grant. Recommendation: The County should review its internal control procedures to ensure there is a process for documentation of proper review and approval over completeness and accuracy of reports are in place before submissions are completed. Corrective Action Planned: The Finance Department, Angela Runde and Cody Blindert, continued to work on the development of the Grant Manager module of Tyler MUNIS. In 2025 it was reviewed with the Department Heads, Kessa Klaas, Cece Fink and Lori Reid as to their responsibility to review each filing for completeness and accuracy before filing. Patrick Montgomery will review with Kessa Klaas the federal program regulations and reporting requirements. A process will be implemented that all federal reports are reviewed by the Finance Director before being submitted. Anticipated Completion date: 3/1/2026.
Federal Program – Supportive Housing for Veterans (Supportive Services for Veterans Families) (SSVF) Assistance Listing Number – 64.033 Significant Deficiency Criteria: The SSVF Program Guide Section VIII, Subsection E. Documentation Required states: Grantees must use adequate financial management s...
Federal Program – Supportive Housing for Veterans (Supportive Services for Veterans Families) (SSVF) Assistance Listing Number – 64.033 Significant Deficiency Criteria: The SSVF Program Guide Section VIII, Subsection E. Documentation Required states: Grantees must use adequate financial management systems that follow generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and provide adequate fiscal control and account records including cost accounting records supported by documentation. Grantees must also maintain all back up documentation and invoices to support the costs paid with SSVF funds.” Condition: During the OBO review, OBO found the Organization was unable to provide a general ledger detail that separated administrative costs from general costs. Cause: Because the Organization’s SSVF administrative costs are allocated payroll expenses, management was unaware they needed to segregate the administrative costs in the general ledger. Effect: The Organization’s failure to provide a general ledger that separates administrative and general expenses increases the risk of inaccurate financial results being provided at closeout or unauthorized and ineligible expenses being charged to the award, which may result in subsequent funding shortages for other qualified expenses. Questioned Costs: None Identification as a repeat finding: This is a repeat finding. Corrective Action: As of 2/17/2025 OKVU added sub-coding to the general ledger to identify administrative labor costs under 7000 – Salaries & wages, 7100 – Fringe benefits and 7200 – Payroll taxes bases on direct allocations provided to the payroll system. This information will be provided by report from the payroll system and added via journal entry to the GL.
Federal Program – Supportive Housing for Veterans (Supportive Services for Veterans Families) (SSVF) Assistance Listing Number – 64.033 Significant Deficiency Criteria: The SSVF Program Guide (March 2021) Section VII, Subsection E. Notification to Participants, states: “To ensure that Veteran famili...
Federal Program – Supportive Housing for Veterans (Supportive Services for Veterans Families) (SSVF) Assistance Listing Number – 64.033 Significant Deficiency Criteria: The SSVF Program Guide (March 2021) Section VII, Subsection E. Notification to Participants, states: “To ensure that Veteran families receiving supportive services under the SSVF Program are receiving quality services, the grantee must give a VA-designated satisfaction survey to each participant within 30 days of the participant’s pending exit from the grantee’s program.” Condition: The Office of Business Oversight (OBO) performed a review to assess the Organization’s compliance with SSVF program and other federal requirements and regulations. During this review, OBO found 15 case files where the Organization provided the VA-designated satisfaction survey late. Cause: As a result of staff turnover, the Organization failed to develop adequate internal controls to ensure management monitored case manager development and reviewed case files for adequate documentation. Effect: The Organization’s failure to provide the VA-designated satisfaction survey within 30 days may decrease feedback to the SSVF Program, which may result in veterans not receiving appropriate assistance and quality services. Questioned Costs: None Identification as a repeat finding: This is a repeat finding. Corrective Action: As of 12/11/2024 OKVU updated the SSVF policy and procedure manual to ensure grant compliance with the VA-designated satisfaction survey and added a review requirement to the discharge file QC checklist. As of 12/11/2024 all case manager staff were provided training.
Name of Auditee: Town of Union, New York Name of Audit Firm: EFPR Group, CPAs, PLLC Period Covered by the Audit: Year ended December 31, 2024 CAP Prepared by: Jennifer Lindsay, Comptroller Phone: (607) 786-2931 (4) Audit Finding 2024-004 - The Town did not submit its audited financial information fo...
Name of Auditee: Town of Union, New York Name of Audit Firm: EFPR Group, CPAs, PLLC Period Covered by the Audit: Year ended December 31, 2024 CAP Prepared by: Jennifer Lindsay, Comptroller Phone: (607) 786-2931 (4) Audit Finding 2024-004 - The Town did not submit its audited financial information for the year ended December 31, 2024, to the FAC or to HUD via the FDS by the required deadlines. (a) Implementation Plan of Actions - The Town will work with MUNIS representatives to address specific challenges and expedite the resolution of technical system issues. (b) Implementation Date - This will be implemented for the year ending December 31, 2025. (c) Persons Responsible for Implementation - The Comptroller and the Town Board.
Management’s Response: Management will initiate controls to ensure that the funds from the calculation of the prior year surplus cash calculation are deposited in the residual receipts reserve for the year ended December 31, 2025.
Management’s Response: Management will initiate controls to ensure that the funds from the calculation of the prior year surplus cash calculation are deposited in the residual receipts reserve for the year ended December 31, 2025.
View Audit 373162 Questioned Costs: $1
Management’s Response: Management will initiate controls to ensure that the funds from the calculation of the prior year surplus cash calculation are deposited in the residual receipts reserve for the year ended December 31, 2025.
Management’s Response: Management will initiate controls to ensure that the funds from the calculation of the prior year surplus cash calculation are deposited in the residual receipts reserve for the year ended December 31, 2025.
View Audit 373160 Questioned Costs: $1
Management’s Response: Management will initiate controls to ensure that the funds from the calculation of the prior year surplus cash calculation are deposited in the residual receipts reserve for the year ended December 31, 2025.
Management’s Response: Management will initiate controls to ensure that the funds from the calculation of the prior year surplus cash calculation are deposited in the residual receipts reserve for the year ended December 31, 2025.
View Audit 373159 Questioned Costs: $1
Management’s Response: Management will initiate controls to ensure that the funds from the calculation of the prior year surplus cash calculation are deposited in the residual receipts reserve for the year ending December 31, 2025.
Management’s Response: Management will initiate controls to ensure that the funds from the calculation of the prior year surplus cash calculation are deposited in the residual receipts reserve for the year ending December 31, 2025.
View Audit 373155 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 2024-002 – Monthly Reporting/Tracking of Government Grants Statement of Condition: MBCDC receives many cost reimbursement government grants with monthly reporting. During the audit process, MBCDC was unable to provide reports from the accounting software demonstrating the grants are fully ut...
Finding 2024-002 – Monthly Reporting/Tracking of Government Grants Statement of Condition: MBCDC receives many cost reimbursement government grants with monthly reporting. During the audit process, MBCDC was unable to provide reports from the accounting software demonstrating the grants are fully utilized. These grants are subject to oversight and repayments could occur. Corrective Action Plan: MBCDC will update the grant tracking spreadsheets for federal funds and devote more resources to proper tracking procedures. Status: In process. Correction Action Completed For the year ended December 31, 2024, the audit disclosed no findings, questioned costs, or recommendations that were completed and required to be reported.
View Audit 373103 Questioned Costs: $1
Name of audit firm: Donovan CPAs Period covered by the audit: For the year ended December 31, 2024 Corrective action prepared by: Name: Amina Pierson, Martindale Brightwood Community Development Corporation Position: CEO & Executive Director Telephone number: (317) 957-2300 Email address: apierson@m...
Name of audit firm: Donovan CPAs Period covered by the audit: For the year ended December 31, 2024 Corrective action prepared by: Name: Amina Pierson, Martindale Brightwood Community Development Corporation Position: CEO & Executive Director Telephone number: (317) 957-2300 Email address: apierson@mbcdc.org Current Finding on Schedule of Findings, Questioned Costs, and Recommendations Correction Action Not Started or in Process Finding 2024-001 – Filing Annual Reports Timely Statement of Condition: MBCDC violated the single audit requirements by not filing the Single Audit Data Collection Form (SF-SAC) to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse in a timely manner. Corrective Action Plan: MBCDC will file the 2024 and 2023 audited financial statements with the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and will continue to do so when required. Status: In process.
Condition: During the audit it was noted that there were some individuals who did not have documentation of the correct wage that was used ont he grant expenditure report. The Club also does not keep any copies of the invoices to back up which expenses are allocated to the grant. Plan: The Club plan...
Condition: During the audit it was noted that there were some individuals who did not have documentation of the correct wage that was used ont he grant expenditure report. The Club also does not keep any copies of the invoices to back up which expenses are allocated to the grant. Plan: The Club plans to review the issue with its current procedures and revise them as necessary to provide better controls over grant expenditures. Anticipated Date of Completion: As soon as possible - before FY25 year end Name of Contact Person: Germain Castellanos, CEO Management Response: Since the audit, we have started to keep the documentation for each salary increase and review in the employee's personnel files and the supplies that have been purchased.
Condition: During the audit it was noted that, in the beginning of the year, employee timecards were missing. Plan: The Club will review their monitoring procedures to ensure consistent retention of employee timecards. Anticipated Date of Completion: As soon as possible - before FY25 year end Name o...
Condition: During the audit it was noted that, in the beginning of the year, employee timecards were missing. Plan: The Club will review their monitoring procedures to ensure consistent retention of employee timecards. Anticipated Date of Completion: As soon as possible - before FY25 year end Name of Contact Person: Germain Castellanos, CEO Management Response: Since the audit, we have reviewed our monitoring procedures to ensure consistent approval of employee timecards.
Condition: During the audit it was noted that instances of wages submitted for reimbursement for two Club employees were more than gross wages that should have been assigned to the grant based on the amount of the paycheck and the percentage allocation. Plan: The Club plans to review the issue with ...
Condition: During the audit it was noted that instances of wages submitted for reimbursement for two Club employees were more than gross wages that should have been assigned to the grant based on the amount of the paycheck and the percentage allocation. Plan: The Club plans to review the issue with its current procedures and revise them as necessary to provide better controls over grant expenditures. Anticipated Date of Completion: As soon as possible - before FY25 year end Name of Contact Person: Germain Castellanos, CEO Management Response: Since the audit, we have evaluated our procedures related to grant reimbursement requests review and we are working on improving our current proceudres.
View Audit 373037 Questioned Costs: $1
Management recognizes that there was inadequate documentation from multiple districts to support salary and benefit costs within the Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies program. Also, Centennial BOCES recognizes, as the fiscal agent, that it is the entity responsible for compliance with the...
Management recognizes that there was inadequate documentation from multiple districts to support salary and benefit costs within the Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies program. Also, Centennial BOCES recognizes, as the fiscal agent, that it is the entity responsible for compliance with the rules and regulations of the program, including for those activities taking place at each district. As a result, the Chief Financial Officer will work with the Grants Accountant that manages this program and the distribution of funds to these districts. Ultimately, corrective action will have several aspects: general training and education, targeted training and education for those districts needing more support, and follow-up with districts to ensure accountability and integrity with the rules and regulations surrounding finding # 2024- 001 cited in this single audit. The first level of corrective action will be sending resources by email to each district in our ESSA consortium. These resources will focus around the requirements of time and effort, in order to support salary and benefit costs charged to federal funds. These resources will contain informational content around time and effort requirements and citations to the Cost Principles, as well as examples and scenarios to guide districts through the proper process of documenting these costs. These emails will be to both the fiscal and program representatives at each district, and will take place in Fall 2025. Targeted support will be provided to those districts cited by the auditors as having insufficient time and effort documentation to support the salary and benefits charged to the Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies program. In addition to the previously named elements, this will include scheduling meetings with the district fiscal representative, district program representative, CBOCES Chief Financial Officer, and CBOCES Grants Accountant. These meetings will take place either through a phone call, Zoom, or in person. In these meetings we will go over why the district documentation was deemed insufficient, and then have a conversation around the resources provided and how we can help bring the district into compliance and sustain that compliance going forward. These meetings will be scheduled during Fall 2025.As the final element of this corrective plan, CBOCES will ask districts to provide their time and effort documents that appropriately support the salary and benefits being charged during FY26. For districts with adequate documentation, we will ask for time and effort documentation at the end of the fiscal year, to support salary and benefit costs for the fiscal year. For districts with inadequate documentation, we will ask for a sample of two months of time and effort documentation during the fiscal year to monitor progress. If sufficient, no further action will be required of the district. If insufficient, CBOCES will contact the district and work to remediate any inadequacies or questions. These districts will also be required to provide time and effort documentation at the end of the fiscal year, to support salary and benefit costs for the fiscal year. Recognizing the timing of this single audit report, Centennial BOCES will need to address the current time and effort documentation at districts for FY25. Before training activities begin in Fall 2025, CBOCES will ask districts to provide their time and effort documents that appropriately support the salary and benefits being charged during FY25. If found to be insufficient, we will work with applicable districts to correct their documentation and prepare for training activities. This work will be tailored to the specific needs of each district. For future fiscal years beyond FY26, CBOCES will work to maintain compliance by asking each district to provide time and effort documentation at the end of the fiscal year, to support salary and benefit costs for the fiscal year. Also, new fiscal and program representatives at districts will be provided with the training and education documents named in the second paragraph of this action plan.
View Audit 373022 Questioned Costs: $1
NONCOMPLIANCE WITH REPORTING REQUIREMENTS, CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS, ASSISTANCE LISTING No. 21.027, DIRECT ALLOCATION, YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2024 Name of contact person: Mary Rowe – City Clerk Corrective Action: Reporting policies and procedures will be updated to reflect all ...
NONCOMPLIANCE WITH REPORTING REQUIREMENTS, CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS, ASSISTANCE LISTING No. 21.027, DIRECT ALLOCATION, YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2024 Name of contact person: Mary Rowe – City Clerk Corrective Action: Reporting policies and procedures will be updated to reflect all federal reporting requirements. At a minimum, all reporting details will be reviewed by the City Treasurer and Mayor for completeness, accuracy and compliance with relevant reporting requirements prior to finalizing and formal submission. Proposed Completion Date: December 31, 2025
Management acknowledges that the Single Audit report timelines can be further strengthened. All audit processes are performed using the Recipient systems, which are designed to comply with federal requirements. Observations are considered an opportunity to improve coordination and internal monitorin...
Management acknowledges that the Single Audit report timelines can be further strengthened. All audit processes are performed using the Recipient systems, which are designed to comply with federal requirements. Observations are considered an opportunity to improve coordination and internal monitoring.
« 1 155 156 158 159 953 »