Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
57,705
In database
Filtered Results
11,650
Matching current filters
Showing Page
431 of 466
25 per page

Filters

Clear
The District will enhance inventory records and procedures to ensure that all property items are properly recorded in order to maintain accountability of items purchased with federal funds. Additionally, the District will consult with the grantor agency regarding the allowability of the questioned ...
The District will enhance inventory records and procedures to ensure that all property items are properly recorded in order to maintain accountability of items purchased with federal funds. Additionally, the District will consult with the grantor agency regarding the allowability of the questioned costs.
View Audit 21094 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 2022-001 Condition/Context The Center improperly calculated lost revenues as a result of improperly including contributions and improperly excluding contractual adjustments related to patient service revenues. This is not a statistically valid sample. Corrective Action Plan Corrective Action...
Finding 2022-001 Condition/Context The Center improperly calculated lost revenues as a result of improperly including contributions and improperly excluding contractual adjustments related to patient service revenues. This is not a statistically valid sample. Corrective Action Plan Corrective Action Planned: St. Joseph's Center will correct the lost revenues calculation in the Period 4 Submission due March 31, 2023. In order to ensure that St. Joseph's Center properly calculates lost revenues in the future, all lost revenue calculations and source documents will be prepared by the Accounting Manager and reviewed by the Chief Financial Officer. Name(s) of Contact Person(s) Responsible for Corrective Action: James Ceccoli, CFO Anticipated Completion Date: 3/31/2023
The Executive Director, Managing Director of Operations, Finance Team and select board members will go through Federal Grants Training within the next 6 months. All contracts for construction projects will go through legal review before being signed by management. A contract checklist will be develo...
The Executive Director, Managing Director of Operations, Finance Team and select board members will go through Federal Grants Training within the next 6 months. All contracts for construction projects will go through legal review before being signed by management. A contract checklist will be developed to identify necessary provisions based on the funding source. This will be implemented immediately by the Executive Director and the Managing Director of Operations. The Board of Directors will approve all contracts over $15,000. Once the contract is implemented the Finance Team will ensure that all payroll documentation will be submitted in accordance with the cadence outlined in the contract.
Finding number: 2022-003 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Education Programs: Student Financial Assistance Cluster CFDA #: 84.063 and 84.268 Award year: 2022 Corrective Action Plan: Upon review, the students identified in this finding did not appear on the Return to Title IV funds report ...
Finding number: 2022-003 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Education Programs: Student Financial Assistance Cluster CFDA #: 84.063 and 84.268 Award year: 2022 Corrective Action Plan: Upon review, the students identified in this finding did not appear on the Return to Title IV funds report the Student Financial Services Office generates to identify and return unearned funds to the Department of Education. The University has updated procedures where a secondary report has been created and is evaluated on a weekly basis to ensure funds are returned in a timely manner. The University did not find any additional instances of this situation. Timeline for Implementation of Corrective Action Plan: Fiscal year 2023 Contact Person Stephanie King Executive Director of Student Financial Services
Finding number: 2022-002 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Education Programs: Student Financial Assistance Cluster CFDA #: 84.063 and 84.268 Award year: 2022 Corrective Action Plan: The University evaluated both student records to determine the cause for the late reporting to NSLDS. Th...
Finding number: 2022-002 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Education Programs: Student Financial Assistance Cluster CFDA #: 84.063 and 84.268 Award year: 2022 Corrective Action Plan: The University evaluated both student records to determine the cause for the late reporting to NSLDS. The first student reported in this finding completed their degree requirements after the conclusion of the semester and the enrollment status reporting to the National Student Loan Clearinghouse. The policy of the University is to manually update NSLC however, the student was inadvertently missed in this process. The University office responsible for reporting enrollment status changes has determined this to be an isolated instance. The second student in this finding did not have their change in enrollment status updated in the early May reporting to NSLC as the student?s status did not change until two weeks later. The student?s record was rejected on the June NSLC report and not re-reported until the fall semester report. The office responsible for reporting enrollment status changes have updated their procedures to identify and review rejected student enrollment records. Rejected enrollment records will be evaluated by the reporting office and manually update NSLC with the accurate enrollment status to ensure proper updates are completed in a timely manner. Timeline for Implementation of Corrective Action Plan: Fiscal year 2023 Contact Person Stephanie King Executive Director of Student Financial Services
Compliance requirement ? Earmarking Institutional Comments on Findings and Recommendations: 1. The institution does not concur with the auditor finding because all initiatives and expenditures related to the HEERF funds were precisely and strictly used to monitor, suppress the COVID-19 emergency and...
Compliance requirement ? Earmarking Institutional Comments on Findings and Recommendations: 1. The institution does not concur with the auditor finding because all initiatives and expenditures related to the HEERF funds were precisely and strictly used to monitor, suppress the COVID-19 emergency and additionally to outreach students about the opportunity to receive financial aid, (and they indeed received) due to recent unemployment and financial hardship during the pandemic times. Part of this initiatives were documented in our web page and disseminated through e-mails, phone calls, word of mouth among the community. The institution followed the recommended state and federal government guidelines on maintaining an active program to prevent and respond to the COVID-19 emergency. The institution uses HEERF funds to establish and maintain the following preventive and suppressing measures to fight the COVID-19 emergency, among others: a. Screening temperature b. Purchase covid test kits c. Created and posted many warning banners and instructions d. Purchase prevention and protection supplies for students, faculty, visitor and staff a. Hand sanitizer b. Alcohol auto sprayers c. Face Shields d. Thermometers e. Protective plastic shields for the desks e. Implemented remote education a. Habilitated smart educational rooms for remote education i. Smart TV's ii. High quality microphones iii. Acquired "Zoom" platform licenses iv. Laptops for remote education f. Provided student financial aid to support recent unemployment g. Provided counseling and psychology services to assist students to deal and recover from the emergency. h. Supported a clean and sanitary campus environment with hand sanitizers, handwashing stations, cleaning and disinfection. i. Implemented physical distance j. Keep continued communication with students k. Paid for time off to get vaccinated l. Provided sick leave for COVID treatment and to get vaccinated m. Procured additional space for remote education n. Support costs associated with remote education for students providing laptops and remote communication equipment and hardware Actions Taken or Planned: The institution understands that no further action is necessary or required.
Compliance requirement ? Reporting Institutional Comments on Findings and Recommendations: 1. The institution does not concur with the auditor finding because the institution strictly followed and used the recommended HEERF methodology and reporting guidelines to prepare the quarterly and annual rep...
Compliance requirement ? Reporting Institutional Comments on Findings and Recommendations: 1. The institution does not concur with the auditor finding because the institution strictly followed and used the recommended HEERF methodology and reporting guidelines to prepare the quarterly and annual reports. Since the institution used the reimbursement method, the drawdown were the actual expenditures/costs incurred and requested for reimbursement. The HEERF reporting requirement does not make any indication nor reference to GAAP. The Institutional aid portion expenditures were supported by the proper invoice or check. The evidence was available to the auditors. 2. The institution concurs with the auditor finding. The institution inadvertently, did not include a line item from one of the quarterly reports. The period to make corrections was closed and we sent an e-mail to the department to amend this annual report. 3. The institution concurs with the auditor finding. The annual report contains detail statistical information that not necessarily is supported by our institutions data base and programs. As the ED expressed, this information was unique and challenging, and accordingly, the institution made some reasonable estimates and derivatives in the information provided. As you may notice in the referenced table by the auditor, the differences were minimal. 4. a. The institution concurs with the auditor finding on the difference in Item #5 of the quarterly report. The institution will accordingly amend the report. b. The institution does not concur with the auditor finding on the timely and accurate reporting in publicly posting the quarterly Student Aid Portion. The four quarterly reports were timely submitted with an e-mail to the HEERF reporting staff and timely posted in the institution web page as required by the HEERF reporting instructions. The reports were further reviewed by an officer of the Department of Education (ED). The ED expressed that this information may be unique and challenging to an audit, and indicated that for these public reporting requirements, the auditors may accept as evidence of compliance, contemporarily produced e-mails, webmaster logs, or other relevant documentation establishing good-faith indication that the institution posted the required information at approximately the timelines established by the public reporting requirements. Copy of the e-mails were available to the auditors as evidence of compliance. ED understands that this information may be unique and challenging to audit, particularly because auditors are asked to verify information posted on a webpage which may not be accessible during audit fieldwork. For these public reporting requirements, auditors may accept as evidence of compliance, contemporarily produced emails, webmaster logs, or other relevant documentation establishing a good-faith indication that the institution posted the required information at approximately the timelines established by the public reporting requirements (HEERF Grant Program Auditing Requirements, General Requirements and Information - All HEERF Grantees). 5. The institution does not concur with the auditor finding because the referenced payment was made in accordance with the Institution's fund distribution and the student financial needs, among other factors, at the time of the evaluation and distribution of the funds. The student financial circumstances may have change after the distribution and payments of the financial aid. Additionally, this is an immaterial amount as compare to the total amount of the funds distributed ant the quantity of students served (1 out of 460). Actions Taken or Planned: The institution understands that no further is needed or required.
1. The institution does not agree, nor concurs, with the auditors on this finding because the institution used the reimbursement payment method. This method was the preferred one when the non-federal entity, as our institution, cannot meet the requirements in 2 CFR, section 200.305(b)(1) for advance...
1. The institution does not agree, nor concurs, with the auditors on this finding because the institution used the reimbursement payment method. This method was the preferred one when the non-federal entity, as our institution, cannot meet the requirements in 2 CFR, section 200.305(b)(1) for advance payment and the federal awarding agency sets a specific condition for use of the reimbursement. Title 2 of the CFR Part 200.305(b)(1), establish among others: "The non-Federal entity must be paid in advance, provided it maintains or demonstrates the willingness to maintain both written procedures that minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds and disbursement by the non-Federal entity, and financial management systems that meet the standards for fund control and accountability as established in this part". Furthermore, 2 CFR Part 200.305(b)(3) states: "Reimbursement is the preferred method when the requirements in this paragraph (b) cannot be met, when the Federal awarding agency sets a specific condition per ? 200.208, or when the non-Federal entity requests payment by reimbursement. " Since our institution was not able to meet 2 CFR, section 200.305(b)(1), and the HEERF guidelines has specific condition on how to use the funds; we choose the reimbursement method in the execution of the funds. Our institution adopted all HEERF instructions and guidelines as their policies to comply with the HEERF requirements, in addition to the CFR's regulations. Below some of the guidelines, instructions ad FAQs we adopted followed" a. Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund III, Frequently Asked Questions, American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, Published May 11, 2021, Questions 7 and 11 updated May 24, 2021, Question 36 updated September 30, 2021 b. US Department of Education, Notice of Proposed Institutional Eligibility Criteria, February 25, 2021 c. Federal Register Notice of Interpretation (NOI), regarding Period of Allowable Expenses for Funds Administered under HEERF Program, March 22, 2021 d. HEERF Notice of Interpretation for Period of Allowable HEERF Expenses (March 22, 2021) e. HEERF Lost Revenue FAQs (March 19, 2021) f. HEERF Period of Allowable Expenses Grant Records Notice (March 19, 2021) g. HEERF Grant Program Auditing Requirements (March 8, 2021) h. CRRSAA HEERF II Section 314(a)(1) Frequently Asked Questions (Published January 14, 2021 and Updated: March 19, 2021) i. CRRSAA HEERF II Section 314(a)(2) Frequently Asked Questions (January 14, 2021) j. CRRSAA HEERF II Section 314(a)(4) Frequently Asked Questions (Published January 14, 2021 and Updated: March 19, 2021) k. HEERF I and HEERF II Comparison Fact Sheet (Published January 14, 2021 and Updated: March 19, 2021) 1. HEERF Lost Revenue FAQ's, Published March 19, 2021 m. HEERF II, Public and Private Nonprofit Institution (a)(2) Programs (CFDAs 84.425K), FAQ's, Published January 14, 2021 n. HEERF II, Proprietary Institution Grant Funds for Students (CFDA 84.425Q) ((a)(4) Program), FAQ's Published January 14, 2021, Updated March 19, 2021. o. HEERF II, Public and Private Nonprofit Institution (a)(1) Programs (CFDA 84.425E and 84.425F), FAQ's Published January 14, 2021, Updated March 19, 2021. p. CAREST Act HEERF Rollup FAQs (issued October 14, 2020 and revised November 20, 2020) q. CARES Act HEERF Round 3 FAQs (Issued October 14, 2020 and revised November 20, 2020) r. CARES Act HEERF Supplemental FAQs (Issued June 30, 2020 and revised September 08, 2020) s. CARES Act HEERF Student FAQ's (Issued May 15, 2020) t. CARES Act HEERF Institutional Portion under Section 18004(a)(1) and 18004(c) FAQ's, (Issued April 9, 2020) u. CARES Act HEERF Emergency Financial Aid Grants to Students under Section 18004(a)(1) and 18004(c) FAQ's, (Issued April 9, 2020) v. CARES Act HEERF Institutional Portion under Section 18004(a)(1) and 18004(c) FAQ's, Issued April 9, 2020 w. COVID-19 FAQ's for Title III, IV, V and VII Grantees, June 16, 2020 x. COVID-19 Letter to HEP Grantees on Flexibilities Available Under CARES Act Section 3518, July 1, 2020 2. The institution does not agree, nor concurs, with the auditors on this finding because, as we mention in number 1 above, the institution adopted and followed the federal award and HEERF guidelines in the execution of the funds. The HEER funds were provided during the special national emergency caused by COVID-19. The DOE and HEERF officials issued many written guidelines, instructions, and FAQ's (Frequently Asked Questions) documents, due to the nature and novel of the national emergency situation. The institution adopted, followed, and relied on the many referenced guidelines and exercise extreme judgment to ensure compliance with the federal requirements and use of the funds. The institution belief this referenced guidelines and instruction were very specific and sufficient to execute the use of the funds. All direct charges to federal awards were for allowable costs under the guidelines and instructions from the Department of Education. Some of the allowable costs were verified and validated by an officer of the Department of Education and reviewed by an independent consultant. 3. The institution concurs with the auditor finding. Actions Taken or Planned: The institution begins in addition to the adopted HEERF guidelines, instructions, and CFRs; to develop additional procurement policies and are in the process of completing those policies. The institution expects to have those completed by May 31, 2023.
Compliance requirement - Special tests and provisions ? Gramm-Leach Bliley Act- Student Information Security Institutional Comments on Findings and Recommendations: (a) The institution agrees with the auditor on this finding. The Information Security Program Coordinator's functions were not specifie...
Compliance requirement - Special tests and provisions ? Gramm-Leach Bliley Act- Student Information Security Institutional Comments on Findings and Recommendations: (a) The institution agrees with the auditor on this finding. The Information Security Program Coordinator's functions were not specified in a formal written contract, therefore, the consultant does not have a detail for the functions and responsibilities of his designation. (b) The institution agrees with the auditor on this finding. The Institution has yet to comply with, needs to terminate and correct some of the nine elements that are included in the FTC (Federal Trade Commission). Actions Taken or Planned: 1. A contract with the IT Program Coordinator is being finished with a breakdown of the responsibilities expected for the GLBA requirements. We should be starting it in May 2023. 2. There has been progress in the action plan where a set of estimated time of completion is provided. We will keep doing so and monitor every aspect of the risk assessment to cover and safeguard each area found with a document that indicates any advances. 3. The Institution with the IT Coordinator will keep monitoring each step for the progress and any delay with a task report where it will show any advance or delay for the pending findings so that we can track the development closely until finished. 4. Finally, we will continue with the efforts to document and complete the corrections to the risk assessment results.
Compliance requirement - Special tests and provisions ? Enrollment Reporting Institutional Comments on Findings and Recommendations: (a) The institution agrees with the auditor on this finding in that there was one (1) case where the information of enrollment of this student was not available for ex...
Compliance requirement - Special tests and provisions ? Enrollment Reporting Institutional Comments on Findings and Recommendations: (a) The institution agrees with the auditor on this finding in that there was one (1) case where the information of enrollment of this student was not available for examination. After multiples student search, the institution was unable to locate through the NSLDS the reported status update for said student. (b) The institution also agrees with the auditor in that there were (6) six cases where he noted that institution failed to report the student's status before the thirty (30) day deadline for the NSLDS web reporting. (c) The institution also agrees with the auditor in that there was one (1) instance where the institution submitted one (1) of its's enrollment report updates after the 15 days required timeline. Actions Taken or Planned: The institution would continue to submit its Enrollment Reports monthly in order to notify changes of student status to the Department of Education on a timely basis and to maintain the information of student's enrollment status more effectively.
Compliance requirement ? Special test and provisions - Return of Title IV Funds Institutional Comments on Findings and Recommendations: I. Compliance Requirements ? Applicable After a Student Begins Attendance: a. The institution agrees with the auditors on this finding in which there were two (2) ...
Compliance requirement ? Special test and provisions - Return of Title IV Funds Institutional Comments on Findings and Recommendations: I. Compliance Requirements ? Applicable After a Student Begins Attendance: a. The institution agrees with the auditors on this finding in which there were two (2) cases where the auditors noted that the institution failed to determine that the students withdrew within 14 days after the student's last day of attendance. II. Compliance Requirements ? Applicable for a student who does not begin attendance: b. The Institution agrees with the auditors on this finding in which there was one (1) case were the student did not comply with the Incomplete course requirement and an unofficial withdrawal was not performed. Before the audit process was completed, the institution performed a R2T4 calculation and returned to the US Department of Education, the $439.00 associated with this finding. This process was evidenced to the auditors for their records. c. The Institution agrees with the auditors on this finding in which there was one (1) case were the student had stopped attending the enrolled courses without completing at least 60% of the payment period. Before the audit process was completed, the institution had returned to the US Department of Education, the $581.00 associated with this finding. This process was evidenced to the auditors for their records. d. The institution agrees with the auditors that in the cases mentioned in item b and c in that it failed to determine that the students withdrew within 14 days after the student's last day of attendance. e. The institution agrees with the auditors that in the cases mentioned in item b and c in that it failed to return Title IV funds after the 45 days' time frame. Actions Taken or Planned: The institution is aware of the importance to comply with Return of Title IV funds (R2T4) reporting requirements and deadlines. Also, the relation to students last day of attendance (date of withdrawal) vs date of school's determination that the students withdrew and the date of the return of any Title IV funds resulting from an R2T4 calculation. The issues as related to these findings were identified as ones being an oversight and lack in compliance with some of the academic processes as required by R2T4 and has already been discussed with the Academic Dean of the institution who in turn has revisited these matters with Faculty and administrative staff under her supervision including the Registrar. The already instituted task force that meets every Friday of each week to identify and review cases that could affect the R2T4 procedure and requirement has continued to review and evaluate information received from the faculty through the Academic Dean and from information the Registrar's office receives of students that are not attending classes in order to process all applicable withdrawals to assure that the return of Title IV funds procedures and the return of funds if any, are processed timely within the 14 days requirement of the student's last day of attendance and within the 45 days from the date that the institution determined that the student withdrew. Before the audit process was completed, the institution had returned to the US Department of Education, the $439.00 and $581.00 associated with this finding. This process was evidenced to the auditors for their records.
Compliance requirement ? Other ? Policies and Procedures requirements. Institutional Comments on Findings and Recommendations: 1 The institution agrees with the auditors on this finding in which the current University Catalog containing the updated general disclosures for enrolled or prospective st...
Compliance requirement ? Other ? Policies and Procedures requirements. Institutional Comments on Findings and Recommendations: 1 The institution agrees with the auditors on this finding in which the current University Catalog containing the updated general disclosures for enrolled or prospective students were not updated on time for the fiscal year. 2 The institution agrees with the auditors on this finding in which the Drug and Alcohol Abuse Prevention Program did not fully comply with the distribution requirement in writing for each student. It also agrees that the institution did not perform a recent biennial review of its Drug and Alcohol Abuse Prevention Program. Actions Taken or Planned: The institution has already updated, published, and distributed its Catalog to accurately represent the vision and goals, our academic offerings and administrative policies and procedures of our operation. As related to the institutions Drug and Alcohol Abuse Prevention Program, the same was also updated, revised, published, and distributed to all active students and staff. The updated Drug and Alcohol Abuse Prevention Program is also available for distribution for all prospective students and any potential employees through the Admissions and Human Resources offices respectively. The same would also be posted on the Web page of the institution. Evidence of both issues were submitted to the auditors.
Finding: 2022-001 Federal Program: Disbursements to or on Behalf of Students Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for the corrective action: Vandeen McKenzie, Executive Director Financial Aid John Hanson, Director of Financial Aid, Prescott Karen Williams, Director of Financial Aid Opera...
Finding: 2022-001 Federal Program: Disbursements to or on Behalf of Students Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for the corrective action: Vandeen McKenzie, Executive Director Financial Aid John Hanson, Director of Financial Aid, Prescott Karen Williams, Director of Financial Aid Operations Santonio McPhee, Associate Director of Financial Aid Operations View of Responsible Officials: Financial Aid management will establish a control check to monitor that student disbursement notices are being sent within the required timeframe. The control check is comprised of a report generated directly from the University?s student information system and a manual review of the output to confirm notices are being sent. This review will be completed at the start of the new aid year and monthly thereafter.
Based on our grant agreement with Head Start, Easter Seals DC MD VA is required to provide a 20% contribution of total project costs for each annual budget period, unless a waiver has been requested and approved; any combination of actual cash expended, or in-kind contributions, may be used to mee...
Based on our grant agreement with Head Start, Easter Seals DC MD VA is required to provide a 20% contribution of total project costs for each annual budget period, unless a waiver has been requested and approved; any combination of actual cash expended, or in-kind contributions, may be used to meet the matching requirement. As noted in the audit report, our organization did not meet the 20% non-federal match requirement for the latest program year. Our inability to meet the 20% threshold in fiscal year 2022 was, in part, due to a lack of volunteering activity associated with limited operations/required closures of our Head Start locations throughout the COVID pandemic. The mandatory annual waivers associated with our organization?s 20% non-federal share matching contribution requirement for the first four years (ended July 31, 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2022) of our Prince George?s County Head Start Program grant agreement were submitted by the end of the organization?s Fiscal Year 2022. Likewise, the annual waver for the first year (ended June 2022) for our Washington, DC Head Start Program grant agreement was also submitted by the end of Fiscal Year 2022. The outstanding waiver requests are currently under review by representatives of The Administration of Families and Children, the agency that oversees the Office of Head Start program. While we have maintained a constant dialogue with the Office of Head Start over the last several months, which administers grant funding and oversight, we have yet to receive a formal approval for any of the individual submissions. We are hopeful that response to all five waiver requests submitted will be obtained no later than the end of the current grant year for our Prince George?s County Program (July 31, 2023).
Area: Special Tests and Provisions Views of Auditee and Planned Corrective Action: PIU agrees with the finding. PIU will implement monitoring controls over the monthly direct loan reconciliation process performed by the third-party financial aid private consultant. Anticipated Completion Date: Ma...
Area: Special Tests and Provisions Views of Auditee and Planned Corrective Action: PIU agrees with the finding. PIU will implement monitoring controls over the monthly direct loan reconciliation process performed by the third-party financial aid private consultant. Anticipated Completion Date: May 31, 2023 Name of Contact Person and Title: Celia Atoigue, Director of Finance
Area: Special Tests and Provisions Views of Auditee and Planned Corrective Action: PIU agrees with the finding. PIU will implement procedures to improve its knowledge of special test and provisions required for the federal programs under the SFA cluster. PIU will coordinate with its vendor, FA So...
Area: Special Tests and Provisions Views of Auditee and Planned Corrective Action: PIU agrees with the finding. PIU will implement procedures to improve its knowledge of special test and provisions required for the federal programs under the SFA cluster. PIU will coordinate with its vendor, FA Solutions, to improve on its knowledge on this item since they are the vendor that processes all financial aid for PIU. Anticipated Completion Date: May 31, 2023 Name of Contact Person and Title: Celia Atoigue, Director of Finance
Area: Reporting Views of Auditee and Planned Corrective Action: PIU agrees with the finding. PIU will implement review controls over reports required to be submitted for the programs under the SFA cluster. Anticipated Completion Date: May 31, 2023 Name of Contact Person and Title: Celia Atoigue,...
Area: Reporting Views of Auditee and Planned Corrective Action: PIU agrees with the finding. PIU will implement review controls over reports required to be submitted for the programs under the SFA cluster. Anticipated Completion Date: May 31, 2023 Name of Contact Person and Title: Celia Atoigue, Director of Finance
Finding 2022-001 (Significant Deficiency) Condition: The final performance report for the grant year requires the submission of additional performance metrics. The reported metrics included correct underlying data; however, two of the nine required metrics included calculation errors for the grant y...
Finding 2022-001 (Significant Deficiency) Condition: The final performance report for the grant year requires the submission of additional performance metrics. The reported metrics included correct underlying data; however, two of the nine required metrics included calculation errors for the grant year ended June 30, 2022. Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) states the Association is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Cause: Secondary review of performance calculations were not performed. Effect: Not providing accurate performance metrics may lead to inaccurate conclusions on the program's effectiveness. Corrective Plan: The agency has put into place a secondary review in which the report is prepared by the Program Coordinator, in conjunction with the Administrative Assistant, and then reviewed for accuracy by the Senior Director of Grants and Aging. Additionally, the Senior Director will require supporting documentation of metrics being evaluated in conjunction with the report itself to further ensure accuracy.
2022-003 Finding: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. Out of five loans selected for testing, two of the loan agreements did not include a representat...
2022-003 Finding: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. Out of five loans selected for testing, two of the loan agreements did not include a representation that the borrower is not currently debarred, suspended, excluded, or disqualified by any Federal department or agency, and no other procedures were performed by the Organization to determine if these two borrowers were debarred, suspended, excluded, or disqualified. A subsequent review of the borrowers determined that neither was debarred, suspended, excluded, or disqualified. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with this finding. MCCD currently has a section in its loan documents for borrowers to certify that they, any coborrowers or principals, are not presently debarred, suspended, or proposed for debarment from transactions by any Federal department or agency. The two loans referenced in the finding are loans where MCCD was a participating lender; we used the lead lender?s loan documents. The lead lender?s loan documents did not have a section for the borrower to certify they are not debarred, suspended or are being proposed for debarment from transactions by Federal departments or agencies. MCCD will create and implement a policy to verify that borrowers are not debarred, suspended or are being proposed for debarment from transactions by Federal departments or agencies when making a participation loan. MCCD?s Loan Program staff will (1) check the suspension and debarment list through the federal government?s website, and (2) save a copy of the of the results to the borrower?s loan file. Responsible Official: Trish DeAnda, Chief Financial Officer Completion Date: April 21, 2023
2022-002 Disbursement Date Reporting to COD Student Financial Aid Cluster ? Assistance Listing No. Various Auditors? Recommendation: The University must review their policies and procedures to ensure accurate reporting to COD.Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement w...
2022-002 Disbursement Date Reporting to COD Student Financial Aid Cluster ? Assistance Listing No. Various Auditors? Recommendation: The University must review their policies and procedures to ensure accurate reporting to COD.Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Implemented multistage review process to highlight differentials between COD and system disbursement date. Fiscal Year 2022 dates are accurate. Further, implementation of new SIS, Ellucian Colleague will correct the discrepancy issue due to automated functions that will align disbursement dates. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Rusty Hassell, Chief Enrollment Officer; Rachal Wortham, Director of Financial Aid Quality and Compliance; Amanda Schmidt, Director of Student Accounts Planned completion date for corrective action plan: Fiscal year 2022 are corrected and accurate as of March 2023. System transcription complete August 2023.
2022?001 Direct Loan Awarding Federal Direct Student Loans ? Assistance Listing No. 84.268 Auditors? Recommendation: We recommend that the University ensures they have appropriate policies and procedures, as well as safeguards in place to ensure loan eligibility is correctly determined. Explanation ...
2022?001 Direct Loan Awarding Federal Direct Student Loans ? Assistance Listing No. 84.268 Auditors? Recommendation: We recommend that the University ensures they have appropriate policies and procedures, as well as safeguards in place to ensure loan eligibility is correctly determined. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Point has completed the following: 1. Extensive training delivered by external vendor, Enrollment Fuel, in October 2022 focusing on financial aid awarding and cost of attendance. 2. Point University has contracted with Financial Aid Services, Inc. (FAS), whose services begin in April 2023. As an approved third-party financial servicing vendor, FAS will conduct student packaging and review to determine appropriate loan amounts are awarded for all degree-seeking students. 3. The institution will be is changing from BBAY to SAY packaging beginning in Fall 2023 for all students. Uniform packaging procedures for all students which will improve accuracy. 4. The institution is transitioning student information system to Ellucian Colleague, which is being configured for more automated packaging, which will reduce manual errors. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Rusty Hassell, Chief Enrollment Officer; Rachal Wortham, Director of Financial Aid Quality and Compliance; Holly Hardnett, Director of Financial Aid Planned completion date for corrective action plan: 1. October 2022 ? training complete 2. April 2023 ? FAS implementation complete 3. August 2023 4. August 2023
View Audit 20116 Questioned Costs: $1
FINDING 2022-003 (Auditor Assigned Reference Number) Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Greg Hunt Contact Phone Number: (219) 362-7056 Views of Responsible Official: We concur with the finding. Description of Corrective Action Plan: LaPorte Community School Corporation will review the...
FINDING 2022-003 (Auditor Assigned Reference Number) Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Greg Hunt Contact Phone Number: (219) 362-7056 Views of Responsible Official: We concur with the finding. Description of Corrective Action Plan: LaPorte Community School Corporation will review the wage schedule of contractors associated with federal grants with each pay application submitted to ensure proper documentation has been submitted. Anticipated Completion Date: May 15, 2023
FINDING 2022-004 (Auditor Assigned Reference Number) Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Greg Hunt Contact Phone Number: (219) 362-7056 Views of Responsible Official: We concur with the finding. Description of Corrective Action Plan: LaPorte Community School Corporation will review the...
FINDING 2022-004 (Auditor Assigned Reference Number) Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Greg Hunt Contact Phone Number: (219) 362-7056 Views of Responsible Official: We concur with the finding. Description of Corrective Action Plan: LaPorte Community School Corporation will review the Education Stabilization Fund schedule of disbursements more closely prior to submission. Anticipated Completion Date: May 15, 2023
FINDING 2022-005 (Auditor Assigned Reference Number) Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Greg Hunt, Assistant Superintendent of Business & Operations Contact Phone Number: (219) 362-7056 Views of Responsible Official: We concur with the finding. Description of Corrective Action Plan: L...
FINDING 2022-005 (Auditor Assigned Reference Number) Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Greg Hunt, Assistant Superintendent of Business & Operations Contact Phone Number: (219) 362-7056 Views of Responsible Official: We concur with the finding. Description of Corrective Action Plan: LaPorte Community School Corporation will review more closely the submission of costs of the Federal Special Education Grant to ensure that earmarking requirements of the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance is followed. Anticipated Completion Date: May 15, 2023
Finding 24043 (2022-005)
Significant Deficiency 2022
Reporting CFDA No: 84.425E and 84.425F Recommendation: We recommend the College review its reporting procedures to ensure all required steps are included as well as the supporting documentation to prepare the report is retained. The reports should be reviewed by someone other than the preparer of th...
Reporting CFDA No: 84.425E and 84.425F Recommendation: We recommend the College review its reporting procedures to ensure all required steps are included as well as the supporting documentation to prepare the report is retained. The reports should be reviewed by someone other than the preparer of the report and this review should be documented. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The College has already begun these changes and reports will be reviewed for accuracy and timeliness before submission to the federal agency other than the preparer. Cottey College will be compliant with federal programs? regulations and guidelines. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Kimberly Marshall Planned completion date for corrective action plan: 06/30/2023
« 1 429 430 432 433 466 »