Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
64,113
In database
Filtered Results
20,747
Matching current filters
Showing Page
82 of 830
25 per page

Filters

Clear
2025--004 US Department of Education Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matter Cash Management Auditor's Recommendation: One City Schools, Inc. should implement appropriate internal controls for reviewing funding claims prior to submission. Corrective Action: One City ad...
2025--004 US Department of Education Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matter Cash Management Auditor's Recommendation: One City Schools, Inc. should implement appropriate internal controls for reviewing funding claims prior to submission. Corrective Action: One City adopted a new grants management process which requires that all submitted claims are reviewed and signed by two responsible officials. Evidence of approvals will be maintained in the electronic grant files. In addition, One City has developed a training tool so that all staff who have grant claiming authority must participate in the training. The new Chief Financial Officer will monitor compliance with the policy and ensure proper documentation exists. Responsible for Corrective Action: Scott R Haumersen CPA, CGMA Shaumersen@onecityschools.org 608-575-4950 Anticipated Completion Date: June 30th, 2026
Finding Number: 2025-039 Planned Corrective Action: To proactively address these issues, FAHCA has taken several steps to improve efficiency and survey scheduling accuracy. The Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Protocol, revised in 2024, has enhanced tracking measures to better identify ...
Finding Number: 2025-039 Planned Corrective Action: To proactively address these issues, FAHCA has taken several steps to improve efficiency and survey scheduling accuracy. The Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Protocol, revised in 2024, has enhanced tracking measures to better identify and prioritize surveys requiring scheduling. Both management and schedulers participated in targeted training sessions held in August 2024 and December 2024. In addition, Monthly Scheduler calls are conducted to provide ongoing guidance and support to field offices regarding scheduling needs and best practices. Furthermore, scheduling workload updates are reviewed every two weeks during Bureau Call Meetings with schedulers and managers to ensure continual monitoring of survey scheduling needs and progress. This improvement reflects the commitment of staff and leadership to proactively respond to challenges and implement strategies that advance the agency’s overall performance. Anticipated Completion Date: September 15, 2026 Responsible Contact Person: Mary Maloney
Item: 2025-002 Assistance Listing Number: 93.224 Programs: Health Center Program Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-Through Agency: N/A Contract Number: 24H80CS28365; H8JCS54690; 21H8HCS44987 Award Year: June 1, 2024 to May 31, 2025; December 1, 2024 to November 30, 20...
Item: 2025-002 Assistance Listing Number: 93.224 Programs: Health Center Program Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-Through Agency: N/A Contract Number: 24H80CS28365; H8JCS54690; 21H8HCS44987 Award Year: June 1, 2024 to May 31, 2025; December 1, 2024 to November 30, 2025; September 1, 2023 to August 31, 2025 Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions Criteria: Health Centers must prepare and apply a sliding fee discount schedule so that the amounts owed for health center services by eligible patients are adjusted (discounted) based on the patient’s ability to pay. Condition: For five claims tested, the discount for eligible patients was inaccurately calculated and billed. Name of Contact Person: Michele Grebisz, CFO Phone Number: (602)776-0776 Anticipated Completion Date: March 31, 2026 Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and will implement additional controls to ensure sliding fee discounts applied are reviewed and approved before patients are billed. Management will ensure this additional process includes clearly documenting the review and approval.
Corrective Action Plan (CAP) Award Information: NOAA Program Office: NOS Integrated Ocean Observations Systems (IOOS) Federal Award Numbers (FAIN): NA21NOS0120097, NA24NOSX012C0024, and NA23NOS0120243 Recipient Organization: Southeast Coastal Ocean Observing Regional Association Recipient UEI: EEL2L...
Corrective Action Plan (CAP) Award Information: NOAA Program Office: NOS Integrated Ocean Observations Systems (IOOS) Federal Award Numbers (FAIN): NA21NOS0120097, NA24NOSX012C0024, and NA23NOS0120243 Recipient Organization: Southeast Coastal Ocean Observing Regional Association Recipient UEI: EEL2LR5E2R85 Project Title: SECOORA: Delivering actionable coastal and ocean information from high-quality science and observations for the Southeast Project Period: 7/1/21-6/30/26 Criteria: During our single audit for the year ended June 30, 2025, we identified that required subawards were not reported in SAM.gov (previously in the FFATA Subaward Reporting System (“FSRS”)) within the 30-day FFATA reporting window, as required by 2 CFR Part 170 and NOAA award terms. This constitutes noncompliance with federal award requirements and may trigger remedies under 2 CFR § 200.339. Cause: The Association was subject to FFATA reporting requirements under its cooperative agreement with the Integrated Ocean Observing System (“IOOS”) Office within the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (“NOAA”). The cause of the FFATA reporting lapses was an interpretation gap of requirements under a cooperative agreement versus a prime grant award, and management has agreed to promptly remediate and implement controls. The noncompliance resulted from a good-faith misunderstanding regarding the applicability of FFATA to cooperative agreements and did not stem from intentional misconduct or an overall deficient control environment. Immediate Corrective Actions Taken: The Association acknowledges lapses in timely reporting of first-tier subawards in the FSRS/SAM.gov and gaps in internal controls, including procedure documentation, tracking of subaward obligation dates, and staff training. The overdue FSRS/SAM.gov reports will be submitted, and NOAA/IOOS will be provided documentation of completion. Long-Term Corrective Actions / Preventive Measures: The Association is in the process of establishing written internal controls, including procedures and tracking mechanisms to ensure timely FFATA reporting, as well as provide training to grants management personnel responsible for FFATA submissions to ensure timely and accurate reporting. Management will continue to use standardized subaward agreements to clearly capture obligation dates and FFATA applicability. Subawards will not be fully executed in the system until the FFATA data fields are completed. There will be a separation of duties for distinct roles for preparer and reviewer/approver. The Association will evidence retention with a central archive of FSRS confirmations, checklists, and supporting documentation and maintain a tracking log with automated reminders for key reporting deadlines. Responsible Personnel: Chief Financial Officer: Megan Lee – Oversees, Reviews, and Approves FFATA reporting compliance and SAM.gov reporting. Ensures required reporting of subaward obligations for FFATA reporting on a monthly basis and ensures timely data submission. Pre/Post Award Grant Specialist– Prepares required reporting of subaward obligations for FFATA reporting on a monthly basis. Timeline for Completion Corrective Action Responsible Party Completion Date Submit overdue FFATA report Chief Financial Officer 06/30/2026 Update written procedures Chief Financial Officer 04/30/2026 Staff online training on FFATA requirements Chief Financial Officer 05/31/2026 Implement dual review of reporting Chief Financial Officer 04/30/2026 Internal Monitoring and Verification: The Association will perform quarterly internal reviews of a sample of subawards to verify: timeliness, data accuracy, documentation, and adherence to reporting process. Finally, the Chief Financial Officer and Pre/Post Award Grant Specialist will report to the Executive Director and escalate any issues identified and implement corrective training as needed. Certification: I certify that the information provided in this Corrective Action Plan is accurate and that the organization is committed to full compliance with the terms and conditions of the NOAA award and the Uniform Guidance (2 CFR Part 200), including remediation of noncompliance consistent with 2 CFR § 200.339.
Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds 21.027 Recommendation: CLA recommends that management reinforce and consistently apply key control procedures requiring documented review and approval of all program invoices prior to payment. Management should ensure that reviews explicitly address ...
Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds 21.027 Recommendation: CLA recommends that management reinforce and consistently apply key control procedures requiring documented review and approval of all program invoices prior to payment. Management should ensure that reviews explicitly address allowability, eligibility and within the period of performance under the program and that evidence of such review is retained in accordance with record retention requirements. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action planned in response to finding: Management will enforce the internal controls in place to ensure full compliance. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: Maria Giaimo, CFO Planned completion date for corrective action plan: June 30, 2026
Finding 2025-002 - U.S. Department of Education (ED), Title IV Student Financial Aid Programs - Federal Work-Study Community Service Requirement Not Met and Failure to Report FWS Earnings (significant deficiency): Criteria – Per 34 CFR § 675.18(g), each institution participating in the Federal Work-...
Finding 2025-002 - U.S. Department of Education (ED), Title IV Student Financial Aid Programs - Federal Work-Study Community Service Requirement Not Met and Failure to Report FWS Earnings (significant deficiency): Criteria – Per 34 CFR § 675.18(g), each institution participating in the Federal Work-Study (FWS) Program must use at least 7 percent of its total FWS allocation to compensate students employed in community service activities unless the institution has received an approved waiver from the Department of Education. Per 34 CFR § 675.19(b), institution must maintain fiscal control and accountability over FWS funds and comply with all reporting requirements established by the Secretary. This includes accurately reporting FWS student earnings through required federal systems and maintaining documentation to support reported activity. Condition - Based on documentation provided for the 2024–2025 award year, the institution was authorized a total of $26,649 in Federal Work-Study funds. Of this amount, only $1,057 was identified as wages paid to students employed in community service activities. No documentation was provided to demonstrate that additional community service wages were paid or that a waiver from the U.S. Department of Education of not meeting the required 7 percent community service expenditure threshold. Additionally, during review of the institution’s 2024–2025 Federal Work-Study (FWS) activity, it was noted that FWS student earnings were not reported to the Common Origination and Disbursement (COD) System. The institution’s financial aid records and payroll registers indicate that students earned a total of $23,131 in FWS wages during the award year; however, no corresponding COD submissions or COD acknowledgment files were provided for review to demonstrate that these earnings were reported as required. Cause – The infraction appears to have resulted from failure to monitor compliance with the 7 percent FWS community service requirement and inadequate internal controls to ensure timely and accurate reporting of FWS earnings. Effect – The institution did not comply with the statutory community service spending requirement and FWS earnings were not reported through required federal reporting channels, limiting transparency and federal oversight. Questioned Costs - $0 Perspective – The Federal Work-Study Program includes explicit statutory spending and reporting requirements that are considered key compliance controls. In this instance, the institution expended approximately 4 percent of its authorized FWS allocation ($1,057 of $26,649) on community service wages, compared to the required 7 percent, resulting in a 43 percent shortfall from the required threshold. In addition, 100 percent of FWS earnings identified during testing ($23,131) were not reported to the COD System, as no submission or acknowledgment records were available. Repeat Finding – No Auditor’s Recommendation – We recommend that the institution strengthen monitoring of community service requirements and establish formal FWS reporting controls and perform periodic internal audits of FWS expenditures and reporting to identify and correct issues prior to year-end and federal reporting deadlines. Management’s Response – Per 34 CFR § 675.18(g), each institution participating in the Federal Work-Study (FWS) Program must use at least 7 percent of its total FWS allocation to compensate students employed in community service activities. Based on documentation provided for the 2024-2025 award year, the institution was authorized a total of $26,649 in Federal Work-Study funds. Of this amount, $1,057 was identified as community service wages. No documentation was provided to demonstrate that additional community service wages were paid or that a waiver from ED was requested or approved
Management agrees with this finding. During the merger process, the U.S. Department of Education required that Salus University’s academic year for federal loans be closed out in order to complete the institutional consolidation. During this closed period, several students withdrew from the Summer t...
Management agrees with this finding. During the merger process, the U.S. Department of Education required that Salus University’s academic year for federal loans be closed out in order to complete the institutional consolidation. During this closed period, several students withdrew from the Summer term, which made it difficult to complete the R2T4 process within the standard timeline. This situation was the result of the unique operational constraints associated with the merger and is considered an anomaly rather than a reflection of Salus and Drexel University’s standard procedures. Now that Salus University and Drexel University are fully consolidated, we do not anticipate this circumstance occurring again. Drexel University maintains a written R2T4 policy that includes established procedures, system edit checks, and clearly defined staff responsibilities. Financial Aid team members are fully trained on R2T4 requirements and are responsible for monitoring student withdrawals and completing R2T4 calculations within the required timeframes to ensure compliance with federal regulations.
Management agrees with this finding and s currently working to implement an electronic consent (e-Consent) process for students to ensure compliance and improve documentation of student consent for electronic communications related to financial aid.Two processes are being implemented to address this...
Management agrees with this finding and s currently working to implement an electronic consent (e-Consent) process for students to ensure compliance and improve documentation of student consent for electronic communications related to financial aid.Two processes are being implemented to address this requirement: 1.Incoming Students:For new students, the e-Consent process will be incorporated into the confirmation section ofSlate (University incoming student CRM, Customer Relationship Mangement System). This willallow incoming students to review and complete the e-Consent electronically during theadmissions and enrollment confirmation process. 2.Continuing Students:For currently enrolled students, the e-Consent acknowledgment will be incorporated into theStudent Financial Obligation and Tuition Repayment Agreement (SFO). This ensures thatcontinuing students provide consent as part of the annual financial responsibility agreement process. In addition, information about the e-Consent policy will be published on the Drexel University website within the Terms and Conditions section so students have clear access to the policy and understand the requirements for electronic communication. These updates will ensure that students formally acknowledge and consent to electronic communications regarding financial aid and student account information, strengthening institutional compliance and internal controls. We anticipate having this in place for the start of the 26-27 academic year processing.
A. Remediation of Identified Files For participants who are no longer active in the WIC program, no further action will be taken, as the certification period has concluded. For participants who remain active and whose files lack a signed WIC Agreement of Rights and Responsibilities, an “alert” will ...
A. Remediation of Identified Files For participants who are no longer active in the WIC program, no further action will be taken, as the certification period has concluded. For participants who remain active and whose files lack a signed WIC Agreement of Rights and Responsibilities, an “alert” will be placed in the WIC system to ensure the required signature is obtained at the participant’s next scheduled appointment. The signed agreement will be retained in the participant’s certification file in accordance with documentation requirements. B. Staff Reinforcement and Training The WIC Director meets with staff weekly and will formally address the requirement to obtain and retain a signed WIC Agreement of Rights and Responsibilities annually. Staff will be reminded that a certification file is not considered complete unless all required eligibility documentation, including the signed agreement, is present. C. Strengthened Supervisory Review Control (Monitoring Control) Beginning immediately, the WIC Director (or designated supervisory staff) will implement a documented monitoring control to ensure completeness of eligibility documentation: 1. On a monthly basis, supervisory staff will select a sample of newly certified and recertified participant files. 2. The review will verify that all required eligibility documentation is present, including: o Categorical determination o Proof of residency o Income documentation o Nutritional risk documentation o Signed WIC Agreement of Rights and Responsibilities 3. Evidence of supervisory review (e.g., initials, checklist, or review log) will be retained. 4. Any deficiencies identified during internal monitoring will be corrected promptly, and trends will be discussed with staff. This monitoring control is designed to ensure ongoing compliance with federal and state eligibility documentation requirements and to prevent recurrence of the deficiency.
The District appreciates the opportunity to respond to the audit finding regarding inconsistencies between Title I rank order and the allocation of funds based on low-income student percentages for the 2024-2025 fiscal year. Our review indicates that the variance in allocations resulted from a budge...
The District appreciates the opportunity to respond to the audit finding regarding inconsistencies between Title I rank order and the allocation of funds based on low-income student percentages for the 2024-2025 fiscal year. Our review indicates that the variance in allocations resulted from a budget decision to provide additional Title I funding to Bowling Green Elementary to support after-school programming, without fully accounting for per-pupil allocation. Historically, Bowling Green Elementary has served one of the highest concentrations of students from low-income families in the District, and the additional allocation was intended to ensure continuity of extended learning opportunities for students with significant academic need. While this decision was grounded in student need, the District recognizes that the additional funds were not fully reconciled with updated poverty data and required rank-order calculations. The District has demonstrated compliance with rank and serve requirements in prior years; however, to prevent recurrence, we are strengthening our internal controls. Beginning immediately, the District will implement a structured monthly review of Title I school allocations involving the Title I Program Specialist, the Finance Director, and the Deputy Superintendent to ensure that the 2025-2026 allocations align with current poverty data and PSES calculations. Additionally, the District will seek guidance from the Florida Department of Education Title I Office to confirm that our procedures fully meet all regulatory expectations. The District is confident that these corrective actions will ensure full compliance in 2025-2026 moving forward and will strengthen the integrity of our allocation processes.
Child Nutrition Cluster, ALN’s 10.553 & 10.555 Recommendation: We recommend the review and approval process over monthly claims for reimbursement be strengthened to enhance the prevention of discrepancies between the claim for reimbursement and underlying data. Explanation of disagreement with audit...
Child Nutrition Cluster, ALN’s 10.553 & 10.555 Recommendation: We recommend the review and approval process over monthly claims for reimbursement be strengthened to enhance the prevention of discrepancies between the claim for reimbursement and underlying data. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: Management agrees with the finding. Action taken in response to finding: Newton operated the National School Lunch Program (NSLP) during the Extended School Year (ESY) for the first time during the summer 2024, which created a reporting challenge. Students from across the district's 23 schools attended ESY in seven (7) schools/sites, but their school-year home schools could not be changed in the Student Information System (Aspen). Therefore, student meal counts reported to their home school on the FP9 but had to be reported on the DESE School Report for the ESY school/site they attended. Given the system interface complexities, some counts had to be manually entered, for which two (2) meal counts were incorrectly entered for breakfast versus lunch. Given that the district did not operate the School Breakfast Program (SBP) and did not serve breakfast, these two (2) manual errors were counted as lunch counts when entered for the School Report. The total meal count did match on the FP9 and School Report. For this inconsistency, the correct action should have been to manually update these two counts in the Point of Sale system (Mosaic) so that the two breakfast counts reflected correctly as lunch counts. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Amy Mistrot, NPS Director of Business Operations. Planned completion date for corrective action plan: Newton was able to set conditional parameters in Aspen for ESY 2025 so that the student meal counts reported to their ESY school/site versus their home school, so this reporting issue was corrected the following summer.
Condition: Multiple individuals are responsible for the preparation and submission of the District's quarterly exepnditure reports; however, the expenditure reports filed for September 30, 2024 included expenditures in the amount of $22,040 that were neither obligated nor liquidated by the date of t...
Condition: Multiple individuals are responsible for the preparation and submission of the District's quarterly exepnditure reports; however, the expenditure reports filed for September 30, 2024 included expenditures in the amount of $22,040 that were neither obligated nor liquidated by the date of the report. Plan: Mannagement will review all expenditure reports. Only expenditures obligated within the grant period will be included on the expenditure report. Any obligations not yet liquidated will be reported as such.
Segregation of Duties Recommendation: We recommend the University implement additional internal controls to ensure proper segregation of duties. This includes hiring additional staff or redistributing responsibilities to separate the functions of authorizing, processing, and reviewing transactions. ...
Segregation of Duties Recommendation: We recommend the University implement additional internal controls to ensure proper segregation of duties. This includes hiring additional staff or redistributing responsibilities to separate the functions of authorizing, processing, and reviewing transactions. Additionally, ongoing training should be provided to financial aid staff on the importance of internal controls and compliance with Title IV regulations. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Management will review its staffing and the need for separation of duties as part of an effective internal control system and take appropriate actions.. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Vice President for Enrollment Management Damon Wade, Director of Financial Aid Deniesha Newby, and Controller Will Gibbons Planned completion date for corrective action plan: June 30, 2026
Credit Balance Recommendation: We recommend the University evaluate its procedures and policies around credit balances to ensure that students are refunded within the fourteen day requirement. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action tak...
Credit Balance Recommendation: We recommend the University evaluate its procedures and policies around credit balances to ensure that students are refunded within the fourteen day requirement. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Management understands this federal requirement and will ensure that it is met. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Controller Will Gibbons Planned completion date for corrective action plan: June 30, 2026
Direct Loan Reconciliations Recommendation: The University should ensure all necessary employees receive proper training, support, and time to follow the University’s policies and federal requirements related to monthly reconciliations. There should be a process to maintain all reconciliations as su...
Direct Loan Reconciliations Recommendation: The University should ensure all necessary employees receive proper training, support, and time to follow the University’s policies and federal requirements related to monthly reconciliations. There should be a process to maintain all reconciliations as support of performance monthly. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Management will take action to ensure compliance with this recommendation.. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Director of Financial Aid Deniesha Newby Planned completion date for corrective action plan: June 30, 2026
Direct Loan Overaward Recommendation: We recommend the University establish additional policies to ensure all students meet the financial need criteria before awarding Title IV funds. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in res...
Direct Loan Overaward Recommendation: We recommend the University establish additional policies to ensure all students meet the financial need criteria before awarding Title IV funds. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Management will review existing procedures and modify as needed to ensure compliance with this recommendation.. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Director of Financial Aid Deniesha Newby Planned completion date for corrective action plan: June 30, 2026
Return of Title IV (R2T4) Funds Recommendation: We recommend the University review the R2T4 requirements and ensure their process incorporates a review of students to ensure no calculations are missed that should be performed. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement ...
Return of Title IV (R2T4) Funds Recommendation: We recommend the University review the R2T4 requirements and ensure their process incorporates a review of students to ensure no calculations are missed that should be performed. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Management will take action to comply with this recommendation. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Director of Financial Aid Deniesha Newby
U.S. Department of Education Maranatha Baptist University (the University) respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended June 30, 2025. Audit period: July 01, 2024 to June 30, 2025 The findings from the schedule of findings and questioned costs are discussed below. The...
U.S. Department of Education Maranatha Baptist University (the University) respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended June 30, 2025. Audit period: July 01, 2024 to June 30, 2025 The findings from the schedule of findings and questioned costs are discussed below. The findings are numbered consistently with the numbers assigned in the schedule. FINDINGS—FINANCIAL STATEMENT AUDIT Our audit did not disclose any matters required to be reported in accordance with Government Auditing Standards. FINDINGS—FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAMS AUDITS U.S. Department of Education 2025-001 Student Financial Assistance Cluster – Assistance Listing No. 84.007, 84.063 & 84.268 Recommendation: We recommend that the University maintain documentation of both formal and informal award notifications in their financial aid software to ensure all necessary communications are made. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The University Financial Aid Office will add a step in the awarding process to verify that award emails are sent and are documented in the system. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: Donald Donovan, Chief Financial Officer Planned completion date for corrective action plan: June 30, 2026 *** If the U.S Department of Education has questions regarding this plan, please call Donald Donovan, Chief Financial Officer, at 920-206-2314.
Corrective Action Plan Corrective Action Plan – Uniform Guidance Audit Finding Organization: Scripps Health and Affiliates Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Homeland Security Pass-Through Agency: California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services UEI Number: JJRCL53EXL36 Audit Period: Year Ended Se...
Corrective Action Plan Corrective Action Plan – Uniform Guidance Audit Finding Organization: Scripps Health and Affiliates Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Homeland Security Pass-Through Agency: California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services UEI Number: JJRCL53EXL36 Audit Period: Year Ended September 30, 2025 Finding Reference Number: 2025-001 Federal Program: COVID-19 – Disaster Grants – Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) Assistance Listing Number: 97.036 Finding Summary: The organization did not employ an adequate internal control review of payroll expenditures to support activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles related to payroll expenditures reimbursed for the project worksheet. Corrective Action Plan: Additional internal controls to ensure payroll expenditures are reviewed were implemented in late fiscal year 2022 by adopting a new approach to ensure compliant timekeeping. The new approach includes the following steps: revised the timekeeping policy to clarify employee and manager responsibilities, modified “failure to comply” provisions, deployed educational programs for both management and staff, reviewed/improved Kronos and UKG Pro Time and Attendance system automated notifications, and training resources have been available to management and staff via our Scripps intranet site. Leadership monitors policy compliance by individual employee and managers via systemwide reporting on a biweekly basis. Responsible Officials & Contact Person: Brett Tande, Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer Scripps Health and Affiliates Expected Completion Date: Completed in fiscal year 2022. As the expenditures in the project worksheet were incurred from the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, the corrective action plan put in place during 2022 could not previously remediate the project; however, all payroll expenditures incurred after the end of fiscal year 2022 have these corrective actions in place.
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2025 Finding: 2025-001 Name of contact person: Corrective Action: Proposed Completion Date: Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs All identified cases are being reviewed and corrected to ensure compliance. Supervisors will conduc...
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2025 Finding: 2025-001 Name of contact person: Corrective Action: Proposed Completion Date: Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs All identified cases are being reviewed and corrected to ensure compliance. Supervisors will conduct targeted refresher training on income and resource calculation, SSI termination procedures, and redetermination timeliness and procedures. Regular quality assurance reviews and staff support will continue to ensure sustained compliance and improved accuracy in case processing. Training will be completed by December 15, 2025. Corrective actions for finding 2025-001 also apply to the State Awards findings. Section IV – State Award Findings and Questioned Costs Lisa Chaney, Nicole Victory and Debbie McGuire - Medicaid Supervisors; Mandy Edwards - Medicaid Manager 189
Corrective Action Plan For the Year Ended June 30, 2025 Finding 2025-003 Name of contact person: Corrective Action: The County acknowledges the material weakness identified in the Medicaid eligibility determination process and agrees with the audit finding. To address the deficiencies noted, the Cou...
Corrective Action Plan For the Year Ended June 30, 2025 Finding 2025-003 Name of contact person: Corrective Action: The County acknowledges the material weakness identified in the Medicaid eligibility determination process and agrees with the audit finding. To address the deficiencies noted, the County will strengthen internal controls related to eligibility determinations by implementing a comprehensive, county-wide corrective action strategy focused on staff competency, supervisory oversight, and process standardization. First, the County will enhance training for all staff involved in Medicaid eligibility determinations. This training will reinforce program requirements and applicable State Medicaid manuals, with specific emphasis on income and resource verification, household composition, timely requests for information, redetermination timeframes, and proper handling of SSI terminations. Refresher trainings will be conducted regularly, and training materials will be updated to reflect current policy and procedural changes. Second, the County will formalize and strengthen its internal case review and quality assurance processes. Supervisory reviews will be conducted routinely to ensure eligibility determinations are accurate, complete, and compliant with federal and state guidelines. Identified errors will be documented, corrected timely, and used as coaching opportunities to prevent recurrence. Management will monitor trends in errors to assess effectiveness of corrective actions and adjust oversight efforts as needed. Anetre Vaughan, Adult Medicaid Supervisor and Jacqueline Boyd, Family and Children's Medicaid Supervisor Section III - Federal Award Findings and Question Costs BUILD YOUR FUTURE ON OUR FOUNDATION 115 Justice Drive  Suite 1  Winton, North Carolina 27986 Office 252.358.7805  Facsimile 252.358.0198  www.HerfordCountyNC.gov 116
Condition: We selected a sample of 25 students that had a change in status. One of the students information was not reported to NSLDS timely, however the College’s controls did detect the error outside the required timeframe, and the error was corrected. We expanded our sample to 50 students. We fou...
Condition: We selected a sample of 25 students that had a change in status. One of the students information was not reported to NSLDS timely, however the College’s controls did detect the error outside the required timeframe, and the error was corrected. We expanded our sample to 50 students. We found another instance of a student’s information not reported timely, however management did eventually detect and correct the error outside the required timeframe. Corrective Action planned: Management agrees and has implemented necessary procedures/controls to ensure the College is in compliance with enrollment requirements. Management has corrected the student’s change status not previously reported. Name(s) of Contact Person(s) Responsible for Corrective Action: {Jennifer Young, Director of Financial Aid and Edgewood Central, and Katelyn Peters, Student Service Specialist.} Anticipated Completion Date: Has already began as of the audit. Staff turnover occurred, have replaced the Student Service Specialist position - now have second point on NSC reporting.
2025-001 Unallowable Costs Planned Corrective Action Plan: Heartwood agrees with the finding and acknowledges that two expenditures charged to the Preschool Development Grants (PDG) program were determined to be unallowable under Federal cost principles. To address this issue and prevent similar occ...
2025-001 Unallowable Costs Planned Corrective Action Plan: Heartwood agrees with the finding and acknowledges that two expenditures charged to the Preschool Development Grants (PDG) program were determined to be unallowable under Federal cost principles. To address this issue and prevent similar occurrences in the future, Heartwood will implement the following corrective actions: 1. Enhanced Review Procedures Heartwood will implement additional review procedures for expenditures charged to Federal programs to ensure that all costs are evaluated for allowability under Uniform Guidance (2 CFR §200.403) and the specific terms and conditions of the PDG grant prior to being charged to the grant. 2. Training for Program and Fiscal Staff Program administrators and fiscal staff responsible for processing or approving grant expenditures will receive training on Federal cost principles and allowable expenditures under Uniform Guidance and the PDG program requirements. 3. Monitoring and Oversight Heartwood will require periodic supervisory review of grant expenditures to confirm that costs charged to the program are properly supported, reasonable, and allowable. 4. Review of Current-Year Expenditures Heartwood will review other expenditures charged to the PDG program during the fiscal year to determine whether additional unallowable costs were incurred and will take appropriate corrective action if necessary. 5. Disposition of Questioned Costs Heartwood will work with the pass-through entity or Federal awarding agency to determine the appropriate disposition of the questioned costs totaling $1,467.53, which may include reimbursement to the grant if required. Anticipated Completion Date: December 31, 2026 Responsible Contact Person: Sherri Sampson, Executive Director
Condition: The subsidiary ledger for loans funded by the Federal award programs maintained by the Department did not agree to the City’s general ledger. Corrective Action Planned: The City is actively evaluating a Loan Servicing software package to replace the current offline subledger and anticipat...
Condition: The subsidiary ledger for loans funded by the Federal award programs maintained by the Department did not agree to the City’s general ledger. Corrective Action Planned: The City is actively evaluating a Loan Servicing software package to replace the current offline subledger and anticipate on implementing it in fiscal year 2027. Going forward, Office of Strategic Planning and Community Development (OSPCD) Finance in conjunction with the Auditing Department will train the OSPCD program director and staff on the agreed standard methodology and criteria for recording and reporting new loans and payments in both the subledger and MUNIS. Loan activity will be reconciled to the general ledger to ensure compliance each fiscal year. The City will continue to research discrepancies for CDBG and HOME, make necessary adjustments and plans on resolving the remaining variances in these two program accounts. Anticipated Completion Date: September of 2026 Contact: Alan Inacio, OSPCD Director of Finance and Administration
Program: Housing Voucher Cluster Federal Financial Assistance Listing Number: 14.871 / 14.879 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Award No. and Year: Multiple Compliance Requirements: Special Tests and Provisions – HQS Enforcement Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency...
Program: Housing Voucher Cluster Federal Financial Assistance Listing Number: 14.871 / 14.879 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Award No. and Year: Multiple Compliance Requirements: Special Tests and Provisions – HQS Enforcement Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance and Instance of Noncompliance Criteria: The 2025 OMB Compliance Supplement requires that for dwellings under Housing Assistance Payment (HAP) contracts that fail a Housing Quality Standards (HQS) inspection, the County must enforce HQS requirements. Specifically, upon notification that a unit has failed HQS, the County must inspect the unit within 15 days to confirm the deficiency and notify the owner if the deficiency is confirmed. Once notified, the owner is required to make the necessary repairs within the prescribed time frame. If the owner does not correct the cited HQS deficiencies within the specified correction period, the County must stop (abate) HAPs beginning no later than the first of the month following the specified correction period or must terminate the HAP contract. Condition: For one sample selected for testing, the County did not timely enforce HQS requirements. Cause: The cause of the finding was an administrative oversight that resulted in delays in issuing the final inspection notice following a missed inspection appointment. The County’s existing procedures did not adequately ensure timely follow-up and escalation when an inspection resulted in a noshow. Effect: Because the required inspection and notification were not completed timely, the County did not fully comply with the HQS enforcement requirements. This delay increased the risk that housing assistance payments could continue for a unit that did not meet HUD’s minimum housing quality standards, potentially affecting program compliance and participant health and safety. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of sixty (60) out of a total population of 1,029 instances of failed HQS were selected. The condition noted above was identified during our procedures related to special tests and provisions – HQS enforcement. Repeat Finding from Prior Years: No. Recommendation: We recommend the County strengthen its HQS enforcement procedures by implementing controls to ensure timely follow-up on failed inspections, including missed appointments. Such controls may include automated tracking of inspection deadlines, supervisory review of no-show appointments, and escalation procedures to ensure owners are notified within required time frames. Management Response and Corrective Action Plan: 1. Person Responsible: Linda Tarzjani, Leasing Manager 2. Corrective action plan: Concur. We will strengthen our HQS enforcement procedures by implementing controls to ensure timely follow-up on failed inspections, including missed appointments. In doing so we will consider automated tracking of inspection deadlines, supervisory review of noshow appointments, and escalation procedures to ensure owners are notified within required time frames. 3. Anticipated Implementation date: February 1, 2026
« 1 80 81 83 84 830 »