Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
61,701
In database
Filtered Results
20,219
Matching current filters
Showing Page
310 of 809
25 per page

Filters

Clear
Name of Responsible Individual: Ms. Terri Grice Corrective Action: The University has implemented a plan to review the NSLDS website within 10 Business Days of any submission to ensure that the submitted data has been processed correctly by Clearinghouse and NSLDS. Anticipated Completion Date: Decem...
Name of Responsible Individual: Ms. Terri Grice Corrective Action: The University has implemented a plan to review the NSLDS website within 10 Business Days of any submission to ensure that the submitted data has been processed correctly by Clearinghouse and NSLDS. Anticipated Completion Date: December 13, 2024
Name of Responsible Individual: Mr. Jay Rebman Corrective Action: Financial Aid and the Controller's Office have implemented a bi-weekly reconciliation process to ensure that any excess funds are disbursed or returned via G5 within the 10 day window. Anticipated Completion Date: December 9, 2024
Name of Responsible Individual: Mr. Jay Rebman Corrective Action: Financial Aid and the Controller's Office have implemented a bi-weekly reconciliation process to ensure that any excess funds are disbursed or returned via G5 within the 10 day window. Anticipated Completion Date: December 9, 2024
2024-002 – Return of Title IV Calculation. Auditor Description of Condition and Effect. A break of at least five consecutive days was not excluded from the reported enrollment period for the Winter 2024 semester, which resulted in the calculation being incorrect for all students who had returns in t...
2024-002 – Return of Title IV Calculation. Auditor Description of Condition and Effect. A break of at least five consecutive days was not excluded from the reported enrollment period for the Winter 2024 semester, which resulted in the calculation being incorrect for all students who had returns in the Winter 2024 semester. As a result of this condition, Return of Title IV calculations were incorrect for five students for the Winter 2024 semester, resulting in $66.52 in excess funds returned to the U.S. Department of Education. It is our understanding that on August 14, 2024, the College repaid the five students affected by this calculation error. Auditor Recommendation. We recommend that the College implement a review process to ensure the number of enrollment days used in the Return of Title IV calculations is accurate and that the R2T4 calculation is reviewed by a second individual. Corrective Action. Upon discovery of the Return of Title IV Calculation error, the College went through and made corrections to all student accounts affected. To prevent a similar problem from arising in the future, the College has developed a review process where the Director of Financial Aid will review break day regulations in the FSA handbook and verify that the Ellucian Colleague annual set-up has accurate break days. The Director of Financial Aid will also verify accuracy as calculations are processed for students. Responsible Party. Jean Zimmerman, Director of Financial Aid. Anticipated Completion Date. August 14, 2024.
Due to the Authority's size, it is cost-prohibitive and impractical to achieve the ideal level of segregationof duties. The Authority has implemented as many controls and segregation of duties as practically possible for an organization of this size.
Due to the Authority's size, it is cost-prohibitive and impractical to achieve the ideal level of segregationof duties. The Authority has implemented as many controls and segregation of duties as practically possible for an organization of this size.
Mortgage Insurance Nursing Homes, Intermediate Care Facilities, Board and Care Homes, and Assisted Living Facilities -Assistance Listing No. 14.129 - Other Matters Recommendation: CLA recommends the organization develops and enforces a policy requiring the independent approval of all bank reconcili...
Mortgage Insurance Nursing Homes, Intermediate Care Facilities, Board and Care Homes, and Assisted Living Facilities -Assistance Listing No. 14.129 - Other Matters Recommendation: CLA recommends the organization develops and enforces a policy requiring the independent approval of all bank reconciliations on a monthly basis. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: Management is in agreement with the finding. Action taken in response to finding: Beginning in December 2023, Webster began implementing Silverstone Living's policy regarding bank reconciliation preparation and approval. Bank reconciliations are prepared on a monthly basis by the Business Office Manager or the Assistant Controller and reviewed by the CFO. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: Janet Langlois, CFO Planned completion date for corrective action plan: December 31, 2023.
Mortgage Insurance Nursing Homes, Intermediate Care Facilities, Board and Care Homes, and Assisted Living Facilities -Assistance Listing No. 14.129 - Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Recommendation: CLA recommends the organization develops and enforces a policy requiring t...
Mortgage Insurance Nursing Homes, Intermediate Care Facilities, Board and Care Homes, and Assisted Living Facilities -Assistance Listing No. 14.129 - Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Recommendation: CLA recommends the organization develops and enforces a policy requiring the approval of all invoices before payment. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: Management is in agreement with the finding. Action taken in response to finding: Starting in April 2024, Webster began implementing Silverstone Living's invoice approval policy. The authorized signers for invoices are the Executive Director, the CFO, and the department heads. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: Janet Langlois, CFO Planned completion date for corrective action plan: April 30, 2024.
Section 8 Project-Based Cluster – Assistance Listing No. 14.195 / 14.856 Recommendation: The Commission should implement processes to ensure that claims for assistance are properly terminated. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action ...
Section 8 Project-Based Cluster – Assistance Listing No. 14.195 / 14.856 Recommendation: The Commission should implement processes to ensure that claims for assistance are properly terminated. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Pratum will ensure that move-outs are processed promptly to prevent assistance payments from being requested for vacant units. The Regional Property Manager will oversee the completion and review of end-of-month checklists to confirm that all monthly tasks have been addressed, thereby minimizing the likelihood of this exception occuring in the future. Effective immediately, HOC’s PM Compliance Manager will ensure that move-outs are processed in a timely manner and will review monthly reports to confirm that esident terminations are handled accurately. For both HOC and Pratum, the HOC team will incorporate any open move-out and move-in actions into the monthly review of past-due certifications as part of the report. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Carmen McLaurin, Vice President of Operation with Pratum, Darcel Cox, Vice President of Compliance with HOC and Ali Ozair, Vice President of Property Management with HOC. Planned completion date for corrective action plan: Pratum and HOC have immediately implemented the corrective actions as outlined above. Both discrepancies have been resolved. The HOC team will include open move-in and move-out actions within the report effective November 2024. If the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development has questions regarding this schedule, please call Timothy Goetzinger, Senior Vice President, Finance / Chief Financial Officer at (301) 949-4690.
View Audit 333618 Questioned Costs: $1
Section 8 Project-Based Cluster – Assistance Listing No. 14.195 / 14.856 Recommendation: The Commission should implement processes to ensure that utility allowances are properly applied. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken ...
Section 8 Project-Based Cluster – Assistance Listing No. 14.195 / 14.856 Recommendation: The Commission should implement processes to ensure that utility allowances are properly applied. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Pratum will review certifications to ensure that any necessary corrections are made so that the correct utility allowance is reflected on the HUD-50059. Management will also ensure that, going forward, site staff review the HUD-50059 utility allowance amounts for accuracy against the approved rent schedule. Additionally, Pratum will ensure that any certifications completed in advance of the Gross Rent Increase are corrected as needed to accurately reflect the correct utility allowance on the HUD-50059. HRD will review and update utility allowances currently in use, comparing them against the latest HUD-approved MOD Rehabilitation gross rent schedule. HRD and HOC Compliance team will develop or update policies and procedures to ensure that utility allowances are verified and updated as required by HUD. The training manager will conduct training sessions for relevant staff members on the utility allowance requirements and how to update them in HRD’s system of record database. As a preventive action, HRD’s management will establish a quarterly file review procedure to ensure that the utility allowances align with the HUD utility allowance approval. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Carmen McLaurin, Vice President of Operation with Pratum, Darcel Cox, Vice President of Compliance with HOC, Ali Ozair, Vice President of Property Management with HOC and Lynn Hayes, Vice President of Housing Resources Division with HOC. Planned completion date for corrective action plan: Pratum has immediately implemented the corrective actions as outlined above and will commit to correcting all specific discrepancies by March 31, 2025. HRD has immediately implemented and will have the corrections to the impacted and future files completed by December 31, 2024.
Section 8 Project-Based Cluster – Assistance Listing No. 14.195 / 14.856 Recommendation: The Commission should implement processes to ensure that rent changes are properly applied. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in res...
Section 8 Project-Based Cluster – Assistance Listing No. 14.195 / 14.856 Recommendation: The Commission should implement processes to ensure that rent changes are properly applied. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Pratum will review certifications to ensure that any necessary corrections are made so that the correct contract rent is reflected on the hUD50059. Moving forward management will ensure that site staff review the HUD-50059 contract rent amounts for accuracy against the approved Rent Schedule. Additionally, Pratum will ensure that certifications are completed early, ahead of any Gross Rent Increase, and that affected certifications are corrected as needed to reflect the correct contract rents on the HUD-500-59. Pratum will also ensure that rent change letters are provided as required, with a copy retained in the resident file along with the certification. Furthermore, management will ensure that a copy of the rent change letter is uploaded to Yardi, along with the completed certification, the completed unit inspection form, and the notification letters for HQS annual inspection scheduling. Lastly, Pratum will review the reference tenant file and provide a copy of the HUD-50059 and rent change form for review. Management will ensure that these documents are retained in the resident file and uploaded to Yardi upon completion of all further certifications. The HOC compliance team will focus on conducting site visits for the Project Based Rental Assisted properties following the same guidelines used for the annual financial audit. The goal is to perform a 100% file review for properties with 25 or less units and a 50% file review for properties with more than 25 units. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Carmen McLaurin, Vice President of Operation with Pratum, Darcel Cox, Vice President of Compliance with HOC and Ali Ozair, Vice President of Property Management with HOC. Planned completion date for corrective action plan: Pratum immediately implemented the corrective actions as outlined above and will commit to correcting all specific discrepancies by March 31, 2025. The HOC compliance team will start site visits by January 2025 and will review files from the start of the fiscal year.
Section 8 Project-Based Cluster – Assistance Listing No. 14.195 / 14.856 Recommendation: The Commission should implement processes to ensure that fatal errors occurring during PIC/TRACS submissions are corrected in a timely manner Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagre...
Section 8 Project-Based Cluster – Assistance Listing No. 14.195 / 14.856 Recommendation: The Commission should implement processes to ensure that fatal errors occurring during PIC/TRACS submissions are corrected in a timely manner Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Previously,Pratum was responsible for completing the certifications and the HOC team was responsible for transmitting the certifications through TRACS. Effective October 1 2024, Pratum assumed responsibility of ensuring that all certifications are transmitted to TRACS in alignment with the HAP reported date. The Regional Property Manager will conduct monthly reviews of HAP and TRACS submissions to ensure accuracy. HRD staff will provide weekly internal staff training to correct PIC errors and procure additional training from a third party consulting company.. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Carmen McLaurin, Vice President of Operation with Pratum, Darcel Cox, Vice President of Compliance with HOC and Lynn Hayes, Vice President of Housing Resources. Planned completion date for corrective action plan: Pratum immediately implemented the corrective actions as outlined above and will commit to correcting all specific discrepancies by March 31, 2025. The HRD team has corrected the errors and will attempt to secure training from a consultant company no later than March 31, 2024.
Section 8 Project-Based Cluster – Assistance Listing No. 14.195 / 14.856 Recommendation: The Commission should implement processes to ensure that all proper documentation is being maintained for inspections of tenant residences. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreem...
Section 8 Project-Based Cluster – Assistance Listing No. 14.195 / 14.856 Recommendation: The Commission should implement processes to ensure that all proper documentation is being maintained for inspections of tenant residences. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Pratum has implemented a policy requiring annual inspections to align with annual recertifications, ensuring compliance with HUD policies. Pratum Regional Property Managers will verify that all annual inspections and their corresponding forms are completed and properly filed in each resident's file. Additionally, a copy of the completed unit inspection form will be uploaded to Yardi along with the certification acket. Pratum will also ensure that all documentation related to scheduled HQS inspections is filed in the resident file and uploaded to Yardi, along with the completed unit inspection form. HOC’s PM Division has engaged an inspection vendor, Gilson Housing Partners, to conduct all annual inspections for the HOC managed properties. The inspections will begin on December 1, 2024 with PBRA communities being the priority. They will complete approximately 150 inspections per month and utilize Yardi Maintenance IQ for record keeping. The results of each inspection will be entered into the system by Gilson and HOC’s Maintenance and PM will have the responsibility of addressing all work.This partnership will ensure that all inspections are completed on schedule and meet the necessary standards. The Compliance team will continue to conduct bi-monthly quality control reviews for the HOC managed properties, after which relevant parties will convene to discuss corrective actions and training opportunities. This interactive process aims to ensure that discrepancies are addressed and corrected effectively. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Carmen McLaurin, Vice President of Operation with Pratum, Darcel Cox, Vice President of Compliance with HOC and Ali Ozair, Vice President of Property Management with HOC. Planned completion date for corrective action plan: Pratum immediately implemented the corrective actions as outlined above and will commit to correcting all specific discrepancies by March 31, 2025. HOC’s third party inspections vendor will begin inspecting units no later than December 1, 2024 and perform annual inspections moving forward.
Section 8 Project-Based Cluster – Assistance Listing No. 14.195 / 14.856 Recommendation: The Commission should implement processes to ensure that all proper documentation is being maintained during the recertification process for every client. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There ...
Section 8 Project-Based Cluster – Assistance Listing No. 14.195 / 14.856 Recommendation: The Commission should implement processes to ensure that all proper documentation is being maintained during the recertification process for every client. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: HOC’s third-party management agent, Pratum Companies, will ensure that all site staff with access to files complete the "Intro to Affordable Housing" training hosted by Pratum Compliance within the next 60 days. Pratum will also mandate that Regional Managers conduct random quarterly reviews of move-in files and annual recertifications. Furthermore, Regional Compliance Managers will perform spot checks and file reviews throughout the year. Currently, every move-in file is reviewed by Pratum’s corporate Compliance team for program compliance, with Community Managers conducting an initial review before submission to the compliance team for final approval. Pratum will ensure that each recertification packet includes a completed application, documentation of income, assets, expenses, and an executed recertification checklist. Additionally, Pratum will generate and send reminder letters at 120, 90, 60, and 30 days to all households to minimize late annual recertifications. The Pratum Regional Managers and the Vice President of Operations will provide oversight and conduct weekly check-ins with the team to assess progress and completion of tasks. Regional Property Managers will review all corrective actions to ensure accuracy. A tracking spreadsheet will be maintained and reviewed during these weekly check-ins. This information will also be shared with the HOC compliance team during the monthly compliance and operations meetings to ensure alignment and transparency. HOC’s Property Management Division now has a Compliance Manager who has updated the internal review process to mandate that all new move-ins and annual recertifications include a completed application, documentation of income, assets, expenses, and an executed recertification checklist. The HOC compliance team will focus on conducting site visits for the Project Based Rental Assisted properties following the same guidelines used for the annual financial audit. The goal is to perform a 100% file review for properties with 25 or less units and a 50% file review for properties with more than 25 units. The Compliance team will continue to conduct bi-monthly quality control reviews for the HOC managed properties, after which relevant parties will convene to discuss corrective actions and training opportunities. This interactive process aims to ensure that discrepancies are addressed and corrected effectively. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Carmen McLaurin, Vice President of Operation with Pratum, Darcel Cox, Vice President of Compliance with HOC and Ali Ozair, Vice President of Property Management with HOC. Planned completion date for corrective action plan: Pratum immediately implemented the corrective actions outlined above and is committed to correcting all specific discrepancies by March 31, 2025. The HOC compliance team will start the site visits in January 2025 and will review files from the start of the fiscal year. The PM Division has begun the updated internal review process outlined in the corrective action and has committed to correcting the discrepancies by November 30, 2024.
Housing Voucher Cluster – Assistance Listing No. 14.871 / 14.879 Recommendation: We recommend the Commission implement processes to ensure that all proper documentation is being maintained during the recertification process for every tenant. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is...
Housing Voucher Cluster – Assistance Listing No. 14.871 / 14.879 Recommendation: We recommend the Commission implement processes to ensure that all proper documentation is being maintained during the recertification process for every tenant. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Effective September 2024, the HOC compliance team significantly enhanced the quality control review process to proactively identify SEMAP findings and eligibility discrepancies before the end of each fiscal year. Staff anticipates that this proactive approach will facilitate early identification of training needs on a more frequent basis, ensuring compliance standards are met while also improving overall program effectiveness. Additionally, HRD staff will identify and address systemic findings during monthly staff meetings. To further support these efforts, HOC enlisted a third-party consulting firm to provide training to new and existing staff in October 2024. Staff were trained on eligibility, portability and SEMAP requirements. Additional HOTMA training is scheduled on 11/6/24 - 11/7/24. Moreover, HOC will continue to procure recurring training based on systemic quality control findings prior to the end of the fiscal year. This comprehensive approach will ensure that staff are well-equipped to address any challenges and enhance overall compliance and effectiveness. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Lynn Hayes, Vice President of Housing Resources Division and Darcel Cox, Vice President of Compliance. Planned completion date for corrective action plan: Staff training commenced October 2024 and will continue throughout the fiscal year.
Housing Voucher Cluster – Assistance Listing No. 14.871 / 14.879 Recommendation: The Commission should implement processes to ensure that all proper documentation is being maintained for inspections of tenant residences. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with...
Housing Voucher Cluster – Assistance Listing No. 14.871 / 14.879 Recommendation: The Commission should implement processes to ensure that all proper documentation is being maintained for inspections of tenant residences. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The Housing Opportunities Commission (“HOC”) and Yardi, software vendor, recently identified a glitch in the system that led to the omission of several inspections. HOC met with Yardi to resolve this issue and autocorrect excluded units. HOC will generate new reports that will accurately identify all residents requiring inspections within 12 months of their last inspection. Effective immediately, staff will generate and review a monthly report of abatements to cancel any HAP contracts that have been in abatement for more than 30 days and assist clients in relocating to another unit. Tenants with units in abatement will receive a 60-day notice of the proposed termination, which will include a relocation packet to initiate the voucher re-issuance process. Staff will hold the termination in abeyance for 30 days if the landlord addresses the cited repairs. Additionally, the Program Manager will conduct a quality control review of 5% of the files for abated units. Both HRD and Gilson, a third party inspection vendor, faced strain due to the high volume of backlogged and current inspections. To mitigate this, the following actions have been implemented: -HRD and Gilson hired additional back-office staff to monitor and manage the workload. -Gilson has cross-trained staff to handle inspection caseloads in the event of staff shortages. -HRD has designated internal staff members to monitor abatements and ensure that re-inspections occur within the required timeframes. These measures aim to improve efficiency and ensure timely processing of inspections. As part of the bi-monthly quality control review, the Compliance team will include an assessment of the abatement report, identifying any units that have been in abatement for over 30 days. The Compliance team will continue to conduct bi-monthly quality control reviews, after which relevant parties will convene to discuss corrective actions and training opportunities. This interactive process aims to ensure that discrepancies are addressed and corrected effectively. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Lynn Hayes, Vice President of Housing Resources Division and Darcel Cox, Vice President of Compliance. Planned completion date for corrective action plan: HRD has immediately implemented the corrective actions outlined above. The HOC compliance team will implement the additional abatement review process starting in December 2024.
View Audit 333618 Questioned Costs: $1
November 18, 2024 Finding 2024-001 Special Tests and Provisions - Return of Title IV: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Otis College of Art and Design agrees with the Return of Title IV calculation finding. This error was noticed by new financial aid staff/administration hi...
November 18, 2024 Finding 2024-001 Special Tests and Provisions - Return of Title IV: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Otis College of Art and Design agrees with the Return of Title IV calculation finding. This error was noticed by new financial aid staff/administration hired in late spring of 2024 after the prior administration had completed all return of Title IV calculations except for the unofficial withdrawals. The new staff noticed the error and made the adjustment going forward starting with the unofficial withdrawals for spring 2024. This error only affected the days of Spring Break. No other semesters had an error in dates used in the Return of the Title IV calculations. Responsible Office and Individual The Executive Director of Financial Aid and The One Stop, Michaela Matsumoto (mmatsumoto@otis.edu) and Registrar Nicole Raef (nraef@otis.edu) are the responsible individuals for implementation of the corrective action plan. Corrective Action Plan Financial Aid Management met with the Registrar's Office to ensure all future semester set up dates are correct and have been reviewed. This improvement of processes to ensure a double check of the Return of Title IV calendar setup has been implemented for 2025-2026.
View Audit 333609 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 2024-001, Significant Deficiency and Non-Material Non-Compliance - Eligibility: During the Medicaid control testing, eleven cases were identified that required subsequent corrections in NCFAST; however, these corrections were not completed within the 20-day requirement following the case wor...
Finding 2024-001, Significant Deficiency and Non-Material Non-Compliance - Eligibility: During the Medicaid control testing, eleven cases were identified that required subsequent corrections in NCFAST; however, these corrections were not completed within the 20-day requirement following the case worker’s audit, as mandated by DHHS policy. Corrective Action Plan: Case Corrections Goal: To ensure Medicaid error findings identified by internal and external audits are timely and accurately corrected for compliance, oversight will be provided by Medicaid Leadership and applicable staff. Plan: The county’s Medicaid Audit Submission tool has been revised to include a case correction due date for eligibility, procedural, and internal control findings. The revision ensures compliance with timely and accurate case corrections. Case corrections must be initiated within five business days of the case audit date. When policy allows, case corrections should be completed within 20 days of the case audit. Performance Improvement Strategies: 1. Program managers, supervisors, applicable lead staff, and trainers, will be provided access and training on the audit tool to monitor the compliance of timely and accurate case corrections. 2. Audit reports will be stored on the county’s OneDrive in the Medicaid Division folder. 3. Supervisors will begin to follow up no later than the 6th business day from the date of audit to ensure case corrections have been completed or initiated, at minimum, by the eligibility specialist. Supervisors will follow up throughout the case correction process to ensure corrections are complete and accurate. 4. Each month, for the prior month, each program manager will select a total of ten audit findings from the Medicaid Audit Finding spreadsheet to ensure their assigned supervisors are compliant with the case correction procedure. These compliance reviews will be conducted and saved to the Medicaid Division folder by the last day of the month. Program managers will take further corrective measures if noncompliance is discovered, by first reporting the continued deficiencies to the Medicaid Division Director. Responsible Parties: Medicaid Program Mangers, Jennifer Hurdle and Alison Westbrook Timeframes: A Medicaid Division meeting will be held no later than November 30, 2024, with all program managers, supervisors, lead staff, and trainers to discuss roles and responsibilities, receive the required training, and the state’s requirement of compliance with monthly audits, case corrections, and corrective actions to mitigate risks from recurring. Agenda and sign-in sheet are required and due to D. Hill no later than December 5, 2024. Finding 2024-001, Significant Deficiency and Non-Material Non-Compliance - Eligibility: During the eligibility compliance testing, it was identified that a Register of Deeds (ROD) check had not been performed at the time of recertification for one case. Although this was an oversight, it did not impact the eligibility determination for the case. The ROD results were subsequently reviewed during the audit process, confirming that the beneficiary was appropriately eligible to receive benefits. This error was classified as a procedural and documentation issue related to the completion of the ROD check. Corrective Action Plan: Register of Deeds Goal: To ensure Register of Deeds (ROD) is inquired and the results are uploaded to the County’s document imaging system when policy requires. Plan: Medicaid programs that have a resource limit require inquiries to be made to the local ROD in the applicant's county of residence to assist with identifying countable and non-countable assets such as real property when determining Medicaid eligibility at application and redetermination. Performance Improvement Strategies: 1. Adult Medicaid - program manager, supervisors, applicable lead staff, and trainers, will develop a required documentation template for all Adult Medicaid staff to use when completing applications and recertifications. The template will be used for all programs under the Adult Medicaid umbrella without exception. The template will include a subsection for resources, highlighting the date ROD checks were conducted and uploaded into NC FAST, if applicable. ROD verification of real property and verification of no real property should be uploaded to the attachments folder within the administrative tab on the Income Support Case. 2. The documentation template will be included in the note section on the beneficiary’s person page or the head of household’s (HOH) person page, if the applicant is not the HOH. 3. The required template will be added to the audit tool to ensurecompliance. 4. Supervisors are required to provide compliance when conducting monthly second party reviews by ensuring the required template, documentation, and uploaded ROD verification is present and correct. 5. Supervisors will take further corrective measures if noncompliance is discovered by first reporting the continued deficiencies to the Medicaid Division Director and Adult Medicaid Program Manager. Responsible Parties: Adult Medicaid Program Manager, Supervisors, Lead Staff, and Trainers Timeframes: A Medicaid Division meeting will be held no later than November 30, 2024, with the Adult Medicaid program managers, supervisors, lead staff, trainers, and other applicable staff to introduce and provide training on the mandatory template. The template will be effective December 1, 2024, with supervisor compliance beginning January 1, 2025, for dates of applications beginning December 1, 2024, and redeterminations initiated beginning December 1, 2024. Agenda and sign-in sheet are required and due to D. Hill no later than December 5, 2024.
Finding: The District did not have signed acknowledgement forms for two of the schools selected to detail their understanding of the District's assessment system security policies for the 2023-2024 school year. Cause: The District did not have a tracking system in place to ensure that signed acknowl...
Finding: The District did not have signed acknowledgement forms for two of the schools selected to detail their understanding of the District's assessment system security policies for the 2023-2024 school year. Cause: The District did not have a tracking system in place to ensure that signed acknowledgement forms for all District schools were received. Recommendation: We recommend the District's Grant Administration team and Assessment Administration team create a tracking tool to help ensure that all schools within the District return the required acknowledgement form on an annual basis. Corrective Action: Moving forward, the school Accountability Leader(SAL) will be required to sign the Security Plan and return it to the Assessment team. The school SAL will also be required to complete a Google form to confirm the completion of the Security plan. Prior to the start of testing for the school, the Assessment Team will audit the Google form responses and follow up with each school that has not completed the form. Escalation Plan: Assessment Team will remind the school SAL via email one time prior to testing; 2nd email notification will include the school leader; 3rd email notification will include the Collaborative Director. Person Responsible for Implementing: Mackenzie Lane - Director, Assessment Implementation Date: 10/30/2024 Status: In Progress
Recommendation: We recommend the University review their current policies and procedures around credit balances and ensure the processes in place are sufficient to ensure student credit balances due to federal funds are refunded within 14 days. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There i...
Recommendation: We recommend the University review their current policies and procedures around credit balances and ensure the processes in place are sufficient to ensure student credit balances due to federal funds are refunded within 14 days. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Continue reviewing student credit balances on a weekly basis ensuring Title IV refund checks are processed within the 14 calendar days. Additionally, the Finace team will review current procedure and draft a formal policy and procedure for Student Credit Balances. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Michael Werner- VP of Finance Planned completion date for corrective action plan: End of Calendar year 2024
Recommendation: We recommend that the University implement a formal review process as it relates to withdrawn students to ensure R2T4 calculations are being performed accurately and timely. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken ...
Recommendation: We recommend that the University implement a formal review process as it relates to withdrawn students to ensure R2T4 calculations are being performed accurately and timely. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: ACU has created 1 additional financial aid advisor position. This position will assist the financial aid team. The Financial aid office will review the withdrawn requests sent to the financial aid inbox on a weekly basis. The withdrawn report will be worked at the end of every week to ensure all withdrawn students have been reviewed to date and all R2T4 calculations have been completed. The Director of Financial Aid will create formal training processes and will conduct training with the financial aid advisors. The Director of Financial Aid will conduct periodic reviews to ensure ongoing compliance with Title IV regulations. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Angel Faast- Director of Financial Aid Planned completion date for corrective action plan: 01/31/2025
View Audit 333555 Questioned Costs: $1
Recommendation: We recommend the University review its reporting procedures to ensure that students’ statuses are accurately and timely reported to NSLDS as required by regulations. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in resp...
Recommendation: We recommend the University review its reporting procedures to ensure that students’ statuses are accurately and timely reported to NSLDS as required by regulations. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The AVP of Institutional Effectiveness will create a secure digital tracking spreadsheet that will contain file submission tracking and error resolution tracking. A digital signature protocol will be implemented that will require a sign off on submission from ADIR and AVP will verify and sign off within 48 hours of submission. A weekly check-in will be conducted on Monday that will review weekly reports, upcoming submissions, error resolution status updates and documentation for meeting outcomes. Tracking deadlines will be implemented for error resolution. ADIR must acknowledge NSC error notifications within 1 business day and error resolution must begin within 2 business days. The first attempt must be completed within 5 business days and secondary error notifications must be addressed within 3 business days. AVP IE will conduct a monthly audit and a quarterly assessment to ensure ongoing compliance with Title IV regulations. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Jeff Phillips-AVP of Institutional Effectiveness Planned completion date for corrective action plan: End of Calendar year 2024
Finding 2024-002: Time and Effort Requirements (50000) Assistance Listing No. 93.600 HeadStart U.S. Department of Health & Human Services Passed through Los Angeles County Office of Education (LACOE) Dear Sir/Madam: Please find enclosed El Monte City School District Corrective Action Plan for the ...
Finding 2024-002: Time and Effort Requirements (50000) Assistance Listing No. 93.600 HeadStart U.S. Department of Health & Human Services Passed through Los Angeles County Office of Education (LACOE) Dear Sir/Madam: Please find enclosed El Monte City School District Corrective Action Plan for the Time and Effort Finding cited in the District's 2023-24 Single Audit. El Monte City School District Corrective Action Plan: Time and Effort Finding (2024-002) Goal: To ensure compliance with federal regulations for time and effort documentation and prevent recurrence of findings related to restricted funding sources. Action Steps: Staff Training and Awareness: • Conduct retraining sessions for relevant staff on federal time and effort reporting requirements. Include specific topics such as: o Record retention requirements for documentation supporting salary and wage charges. o Utilize scenarios and examples related to long tenn leave and benefit payouts with federal programs to enhance understanding. o Require attendees to sign acknowledgment fonns confirming participation and understanding of training content. Enhanced Review Mechanisms: • Establish additional internal controls to ensure compliance, including: o Periodic spot-check audits of time and effort records by the grants compliance officer or designee. o Use a checklist to verify completeness and accuracy of documentation. o Escalate issues to supervisors for prompt resolution before charges are applied to federal grants. Monitoring and Evaluation: • Develop a monitoring plan to ensure ongoing compliance: o Quarterly reviews of time and effort documentation by district leadership. o Solicit feedback from staff on challenges with compliance and address concemi promptly. Responsible Personnel: • Fiscal Area: Assistant Superintendent, Business Services Jose Herrera - Oversight of corrective action implementation and training. • Program Area: Juan Castillo, Director of Child Development- Regular monitoring of compliance for Time and Effort Documentation. Timeline for Implementation: • By March 31, 2024: Complete staff retraining sessions and re-distribute policies bulletins. • By April 30, 2024: Implement enhanced review mechanisms. • Quarterly (Ongoing): Conduct internal reviews and monitoring. By following this corrective action plan, the District aims to fully address the finding and ensure compliance with federal time and effort reporting requirements.
View Audit 333492 Questioned Costs: $1
The City should review its control activities to obtain the maximum internal control possible under the circumstances utilizing currently available staff, including elected officials, to provide additional controls through review of financial transactions, reconciliations and financial report. The r...
The City should review its control activities to obtain the maximum internal control possible under the circumstances utilizing currently available staff, including elected officials, to provide additional controls through review of financial transactions, reconciliations and financial report. The reviews should be documented by the signature or initials of the reviewer and the date of the review.
Compliance officer will be handling this now.
Compliance officer will be handling this now.
The Finance Manager will continue to review bank reconciliations on a monthly basis to ensure everything is accurate and appropriate. On a weekly/bi-weekly basis the Finance Manager has established business office meetings to review opportunities for continuous improvement within the business office...
The Finance Manager will continue to review bank reconciliations on a monthly basis to ensure everything is accurate and appropriate. On a weekly/bi-weekly basis the Finance Manager has established business office meetings to review opportunities for continuous improvement within the business office. As part of these meetings, the Finance Manager plans to review the bank reconciliation process. The Finance Manager will also review financial activity on a monthly basis to look for any discrepancies in the accounts. Throughout the year, the Finance Manager randomly investigates several accounts each month to check for any discrepancies between his expectations and actual results. The Board of Education reviews all checks printed on a monthly basis. After the checks are approved, they are mailed out. Three to four times a year the Finance Committee randomly pulls checks to review them. All expense reports are currently being countersigned. The budget to actual comparisons are reviewed twice a year by the Finance Committee (1st and 3rd quarter) and twice a year by the Board (2nd and 4th quarter). The Finance Manager provides financial updates to the Board of Education on a regular basis. Add items on payroll. District is willing to accept the risk.
Nutrition Cluster – CFDA Nos. 10.553 and 10.555 Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance: See Find-ing 2024-001
Nutrition Cluster – CFDA Nos. 10.553 and 10.555 Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance: See Find-ing 2024-001
« 1 308 309 311 312 809 »