Audit 9493

FY End
2023-06-30
Total Expended
$1.79M
Findings
8
Programs
12
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-01-04

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
7327 2023-003 Significant Deficiency - AB
7328 2023-003 Significant Deficiency - AB
7329 2023-003 Significant Deficiency - AB
7330 2023-003 Significant Deficiency - AB
583769 2023-003 Significant Deficiency - AB
583770 2023-003 Significant Deficiency - AB
583771 2023-003 Significant Deficiency - AB
583772 2023-003 Significant Deficiency - AB

Contacts

Name Title Type
KDBTBE6EJAK5 Erich Heise Auditee
2186946184 Brian Opsahl Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: BASIS OF PRESENTATION Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported under generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP). Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Independent School District No. 162 has not elected to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the “Schedule”) includes the federal award activity of Independent School District No. 162 under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2023. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of Independent School District No. 162, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position or changes in net position of Independent School District No. 162.
Title: COMMODITY DISTRIBUTION Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported under generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP). Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Independent School District No. 162 has not elected to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. This non-monetary assistance (expenditures) is reported in the Schedule at the fair market value of the commodities received.
Title: PASS-THROUGH ENTITIES Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported under generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP). Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Independent School District No. 162 has not elected to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. All pass-through entities listed on the previous page use the same AL numbers as the federal grantors to identify these grants, and have not assigned any additional identifying numbers.
Title: SUBRECIPIENTS Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported under generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP). Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Independent School District No. 162 has not elected to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The District did not pass any federal money to subrecipients.

Finding Details

Federal Program Education Stabilization Fund (AL 84.425) Activities Allowed or Unallowed & Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria The “Basic Guidelines” section of 2 CFR Part 230, Attachment B, Paragraph 8 requires charges to grants for salaries and wages to be based on documented payrolls approved by the District. Condition One employee was overcharged to the grant and the District was unable to provide documentation for a few stipend payments. Questioned Costs Immaterial Context A sample of 18 employees were selected for testing. For one employee tested, noted that the amount charged to the grant for one pay period was higher than the employee’s total payroll for that pay period. There was a negative offset in another payroll account that wasn’t adjusted to the grant. Also, noted there were 3 employees that received stipend payments for a lesser amount than the maximum per employee of $1,000. The District was unable to provide documentation for the calculation of this lesser amount. Cause Staff turnover at the District Effect The District overcharged the grant for one employee and a few stipend payments charged to the grants did not have proper supporting documentation. Repeat Finding No Recommendation The District should review their payroll procedures to ensure the correct amounts are charged to grants and all supporting documentation is maintained. Views of Responsible Officials The District agrees with the recommendation and will review its payroll procedures.
Federal Program Education Stabilization Fund (AL 84.425) Activities Allowed or Unallowed & Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria The “Basic Guidelines” section of 2 CFR Part 230, Attachment B, Paragraph 8 requires charges to grants for salaries and wages to be based on documented payrolls approved by the District. Condition One employee was overcharged to the grant and the District was unable to provide documentation for a few stipend payments. Questioned Costs Immaterial Context A sample of 18 employees were selected for testing. For one employee tested, noted that the amount charged to the grant for one pay period was higher than the employee’s total payroll for that pay period. There was a negative offset in another payroll account that wasn’t adjusted to the grant. Also, noted there were 3 employees that received stipend payments for a lesser amount than the maximum per employee of $1,000. The District was unable to provide documentation for the calculation of this lesser amount. Cause Staff turnover at the District Effect The District overcharged the grant for one employee and a few stipend payments charged to the grants did not have proper supporting documentation. Repeat Finding No Recommendation The District should review their payroll procedures to ensure the correct amounts are charged to grants and all supporting documentation is maintained. Views of Responsible Officials The District agrees with the recommendation and will review its payroll procedures.
Federal Program Education Stabilization Fund (AL 84.425) Activities Allowed or Unallowed & Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria The “Basic Guidelines” section of 2 CFR Part 230, Attachment B, Paragraph 8 requires charges to grants for salaries and wages to be based on documented payrolls approved by the District. Condition One employee was overcharged to the grant and the District was unable to provide documentation for a few stipend payments. Questioned Costs Immaterial Context A sample of 18 employees were selected for testing. For one employee tested, noted that the amount charged to the grant for one pay period was higher than the employee’s total payroll for that pay period. There was a negative offset in another payroll account that wasn’t adjusted to the grant. Also, noted there were 3 employees that received stipend payments for a lesser amount than the maximum per employee of $1,000. The District was unable to provide documentation for the calculation of this lesser amount. Cause Staff turnover at the District Effect The District overcharged the grant for one employee and a few stipend payments charged to the grants did not have proper supporting documentation. Repeat Finding No Recommendation The District should review their payroll procedures to ensure the correct amounts are charged to grants and all supporting documentation is maintained. Views of Responsible Officials The District agrees with the recommendation and will review its payroll procedures.
Federal Program Education Stabilization Fund (AL 84.425) Activities Allowed or Unallowed & Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria The “Basic Guidelines” section of 2 CFR Part 230, Attachment B, Paragraph 8 requires charges to grants for salaries and wages to be based on documented payrolls approved by the District. Condition One employee was overcharged to the grant and the District was unable to provide documentation for a few stipend payments. Questioned Costs Immaterial Context A sample of 18 employees were selected for testing. For one employee tested, noted that the amount charged to the grant for one pay period was higher than the employee’s total payroll for that pay period. There was a negative offset in another payroll account that wasn’t adjusted to the grant. Also, noted there were 3 employees that received stipend payments for a lesser amount than the maximum per employee of $1,000. The District was unable to provide documentation for the calculation of this lesser amount. Cause Staff turnover at the District Effect The District overcharged the grant for one employee and a few stipend payments charged to the grants did not have proper supporting documentation. Repeat Finding No Recommendation The District should review their payroll procedures to ensure the correct amounts are charged to grants and all supporting documentation is maintained. Views of Responsible Officials The District agrees with the recommendation and will review its payroll procedures.
Federal Program Education Stabilization Fund (AL 84.425) Activities Allowed or Unallowed & Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria The “Basic Guidelines” section of 2 CFR Part 230, Attachment B, Paragraph 8 requires charges to grants for salaries and wages to be based on documented payrolls approved by the District. Condition One employee was overcharged to the grant and the District was unable to provide documentation for a few stipend payments. Questioned Costs Immaterial Context A sample of 18 employees were selected for testing. For one employee tested, noted that the amount charged to the grant for one pay period was higher than the employee’s total payroll for that pay period. There was a negative offset in another payroll account that wasn’t adjusted to the grant. Also, noted there were 3 employees that received stipend payments for a lesser amount than the maximum per employee of $1,000. The District was unable to provide documentation for the calculation of this lesser amount. Cause Staff turnover at the District Effect The District overcharged the grant for one employee and a few stipend payments charged to the grants did not have proper supporting documentation. Repeat Finding No Recommendation The District should review their payroll procedures to ensure the correct amounts are charged to grants and all supporting documentation is maintained. Views of Responsible Officials The District agrees with the recommendation and will review its payroll procedures.
Federal Program Education Stabilization Fund (AL 84.425) Activities Allowed or Unallowed & Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria The “Basic Guidelines” section of 2 CFR Part 230, Attachment B, Paragraph 8 requires charges to grants for salaries and wages to be based on documented payrolls approved by the District. Condition One employee was overcharged to the grant and the District was unable to provide documentation for a few stipend payments. Questioned Costs Immaterial Context A sample of 18 employees were selected for testing. For one employee tested, noted that the amount charged to the grant for one pay period was higher than the employee’s total payroll for that pay period. There was a negative offset in another payroll account that wasn’t adjusted to the grant. Also, noted there were 3 employees that received stipend payments for a lesser amount than the maximum per employee of $1,000. The District was unable to provide documentation for the calculation of this lesser amount. Cause Staff turnover at the District Effect The District overcharged the grant for one employee and a few stipend payments charged to the grants did not have proper supporting documentation. Repeat Finding No Recommendation The District should review their payroll procedures to ensure the correct amounts are charged to grants and all supporting documentation is maintained. Views of Responsible Officials The District agrees with the recommendation and will review its payroll procedures.
Federal Program Education Stabilization Fund (AL 84.425) Activities Allowed or Unallowed & Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria The “Basic Guidelines” section of 2 CFR Part 230, Attachment B, Paragraph 8 requires charges to grants for salaries and wages to be based on documented payrolls approved by the District. Condition One employee was overcharged to the grant and the District was unable to provide documentation for a few stipend payments. Questioned Costs Immaterial Context A sample of 18 employees were selected for testing. For one employee tested, noted that the amount charged to the grant for one pay period was higher than the employee’s total payroll for that pay period. There was a negative offset in another payroll account that wasn’t adjusted to the grant. Also, noted there were 3 employees that received stipend payments for a lesser amount than the maximum per employee of $1,000. The District was unable to provide documentation for the calculation of this lesser amount. Cause Staff turnover at the District Effect The District overcharged the grant for one employee and a few stipend payments charged to the grants did not have proper supporting documentation. Repeat Finding No Recommendation The District should review their payroll procedures to ensure the correct amounts are charged to grants and all supporting documentation is maintained. Views of Responsible Officials The District agrees with the recommendation and will review its payroll procedures.
Federal Program Education Stabilization Fund (AL 84.425) Activities Allowed or Unallowed & Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria The “Basic Guidelines” section of 2 CFR Part 230, Attachment B, Paragraph 8 requires charges to grants for salaries and wages to be based on documented payrolls approved by the District. Condition One employee was overcharged to the grant and the District was unable to provide documentation for a few stipend payments. Questioned Costs Immaterial Context A sample of 18 employees were selected for testing. For one employee tested, noted that the amount charged to the grant for one pay period was higher than the employee’s total payroll for that pay period. There was a negative offset in another payroll account that wasn’t adjusted to the grant. Also, noted there were 3 employees that received stipend payments for a lesser amount than the maximum per employee of $1,000. The District was unable to provide documentation for the calculation of this lesser amount. Cause Staff turnover at the District Effect The District overcharged the grant for one employee and a few stipend payments charged to the grants did not have proper supporting documentation. Repeat Finding No Recommendation The District should review their payroll procedures to ensure the correct amounts are charged to grants and all supporting documentation is maintained. Views of Responsible Officials The District agrees with the recommendation and will review its payroll procedures.