Audit 8708

FY End
2023-06-30
Total Expended
$1.84M
Findings
6
Programs
7
Organization: Kairos Academies (MO)
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2023-12-28

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
6781 2023-003 Material Weakness Yes ABI
6782 2023-004 - Yes F
6783 2023-005 - Yes I
583223 2023-003 Material Weakness Yes ABI
583224 2023-004 - Yes F
583225 2023-005 - Yes I

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
84.425 Education Stabilization Fund $1.33M Yes 0
84.282 Charter Schools $262,162 - 3
84.215 Fund for the Improvement of Education $68,496 - 0
10.555 National School Lunch Program $33,099 - 0
84.027 Special Education_grants to States $20,747 - 0
84.010 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies $6,611 - 0
10.553 School Breakfast Program $1,699 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
GN1NPE7WJZ81 Bennie Jackson Auditee
3142520602 Gina Cochran Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the schedule are reported on the modified cash basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The School has not elected to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards includes the federal award activity of Karios Academies (the “School”) under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2023. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the School and is reported on the modified cash basis of accounting, it is not intended to and does not present the net assets, changes in net assets or cash flows of the School.
Title: Subrecipients Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the schedule are reported on the modified cash basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The School has not elected to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. There have been no awards passed through to subrecipients.

Finding Details

Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires expenditures to be supported by appropriately approved purchase orders and price and rate quotes from two qualified sources for small purchases between $10,000 and $249,999. In addition, written policies require approval for purchase of supplies or services by the School’s CFO and additional approval by the Finance Committee in items in excess of $25,000. Condition: Purchase orders are not being prepared and price and rate quotes are not consistently being obtained, evaluated or approved. Cause: The School has written policies and procedures regarding procurement; however, these policies and procedures were not consistently followed. Effect: Lack of effect controls over procurement could lead to unauthorized purchase and the purchase could be disallowed by the federal awarding agency Recommendation: We recommend procedures be established to monitor compliance with the School’s procurement policies to ensure purchases are properly supported with purchase orders and formal approval of purchase in accordance with the School’s policy. In addition, we recommend procedures be established to monitor compliance with Uniform Guidance related to all levels of purchases including but not limited to obtaining and analyzing price and rate quotes for all small purchases. Management Response: Management agrees with the Auditor. Management will develop an internal control manual for Federal grants to monitor compliance with the School's procurement policies to ensure purchases are properly supported with purchase orders, appropriate number of proposals in an approved format, and formally approval of purchase is being documented in accordance with the School's policy. In addition, management of the School will establish procedures to monitor compliance with Uniform Guidance related to all levels of purchases including but not limited to obtaining and analyzing price and rate quotes for all small purchases.
Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires a physical inventory to be taken every 2 years and records of property purchased under federal programs to including certain items including the following: • Description • Serial number or identification number • Source of funding including federal award • Acquisition date • Cost including federal cost or percentage • Location • Use • Condition • Disposition data • Control system to ensure adequate safeguards to prevent loss • Adequate maintenance procedure to keep property in good condition Condition: A physical inventory of property purchased under federal programs is not being performed and the records of capitalized property, plant and equipment do not contain several of the items required under Uniform guidance. Cause: The School’s policies and procedures do not address physical inventory of property, plant and equipment nor the information that should be tracked as part of property purchased under federal programs. Effect: Lack of controls could result in inaccurate equipment and real property management for purchase under federal programs resulting in limited future federal funding for such costs. Recommendation: We recommend School review current policies and procedures surrounding equipment and real property management and establish procedures related to physical inventory and retention of data required under Uniform Guidance. Management Response: Management agrees with the Auditor. Management will work with consultant and implement procedures and train staff on industry best practices on property management. The management team is also reviewing best practices on physical inventory and retention of data required under Uniform Guidance.
Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires procurement procedures to be in place to ensure entities that are entered into on covered transactions are not debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded from participating in covered transactions. Covered transactions include contracts for goods or services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified by Uniform Guidance. Condition: Debarment and suspension review procedures or related controls are not in place. Cause: The School’s procurement policies and procedures do not address review for debarment or suspension. Effect: Contracts for goods or services could be awarded to entities that are debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded from participating in covered transactions. Recommendation: We recommend the School’s procurement procedures and procedures be reviewed and updated to include review of entities for debarment and suspension prior to entering into covered transactions. Management Response: Management agrees with the auditor. Management is currently reviewing the monitor compliance/procurement policies and has purchased software that will allow the School to properly create requisitions/purchase orders. The School has also adopted formal approval procedures in accordance with the School's policy and the Uniform Guidance.
Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires expenditures to be supported by appropriately approved purchase orders and price and rate quotes from two qualified sources for small purchases between $10,000 and $249,999. In addition, written policies require approval for purchase of supplies or services by the School’s CFO and additional approval by the Finance Committee in items in excess of $25,000. Condition: Purchase orders are not being prepared and price and rate quotes are not consistently being obtained, evaluated or approved. Cause: The School has written policies and procedures regarding procurement; however, these policies and procedures were not consistently followed. Effect: Lack of effect controls over procurement could lead to unauthorized purchase and the purchase could be disallowed by the federal awarding agency Recommendation: We recommend procedures be established to monitor compliance with the School’s procurement policies to ensure purchases are properly supported with purchase orders and formal approval of purchase in accordance with the School’s policy. In addition, we recommend procedures be established to monitor compliance with Uniform Guidance related to all levels of purchases including but not limited to obtaining and analyzing price and rate quotes for all small purchases. Management Response: Management agrees with the Auditor. Management will develop an internal control manual for Federal grants to monitor compliance with the School's procurement policies to ensure purchases are properly supported with purchase orders, appropriate number of proposals in an approved format, and formally approval of purchase is being documented in accordance with the School's policy. In addition, management of the School will establish procedures to monitor compliance with Uniform Guidance related to all levels of purchases including but not limited to obtaining and analyzing price and rate quotes for all small purchases.
Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires a physical inventory to be taken every 2 years and records of property purchased under federal programs to including certain items including the following: • Description • Serial number or identification number • Source of funding including federal award • Acquisition date • Cost including federal cost or percentage • Location • Use • Condition • Disposition data • Control system to ensure adequate safeguards to prevent loss • Adequate maintenance procedure to keep property in good condition Condition: A physical inventory of property purchased under federal programs is not being performed and the records of capitalized property, plant and equipment do not contain several of the items required under Uniform guidance. Cause: The School’s policies and procedures do not address physical inventory of property, plant and equipment nor the information that should be tracked as part of property purchased under federal programs. Effect: Lack of controls could result in inaccurate equipment and real property management for purchase under federal programs resulting in limited future federal funding for such costs. Recommendation: We recommend School review current policies and procedures surrounding equipment and real property management and establish procedures related to physical inventory and retention of data required under Uniform Guidance. Management Response: Management agrees with the Auditor. Management will work with consultant and implement procedures and train staff on industry best practices on property management. The management team is also reviewing best practices on physical inventory and retention of data required under Uniform Guidance.
Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires procurement procedures to be in place to ensure entities that are entered into on covered transactions are not debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded from participating in covered transactions. Covered transactions include contracts for goods or services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified by Uniform Guidance. Condition: Debarment and suspension review procedures or related controls are not in place. Cause: The School’s procurement policies and procedures do not address review for debarment or suspension. Effect: Contracts for goods or services could be awarded to entities that are debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded from participating in covered transactions. Recommendation: We recommend the School’s procurement procedures and procedures be reviewed and updated to include review of entities for debarment and suspension prior to entering into covered transactions. Management Response: Management agrees with the auditor. Management is currently reviewing the monitor compliance/procurement policies and has purchased software that will allow the School to properly create requisitions/purchase orders. The School has also adopted formal approval procedures in accordance with the School's policy and the Uniform Guidance.