Audit 79547

FY End
2022-06-30
Total Expended
$1.57M
Findings
2
Programs
2
Organization: Bethlehem Inn and Affiliate (OR)
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-03-08
Auditor: Jones & Roth PC

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
89291 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - I
665733 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - I

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $900,000 Yes 1
14.231 Emergency Solutions Grant Program $20,000 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
N71EP52JBQL6 Gwenn Wysling Auditee
5413228768 Brian Newton Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Insurance Coverage Accounting Policies: Reporting Entity: The reporting entity is fully described in Note 1 to the Organizations financial statements. The Schedule includes all federal programs administered by the Organization for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022. Basis of Presentation: The information in the Schedule is presented in accordance with Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Federal Financial Assistance: Pursuant to the Uniform Guidance, federal financial assistance is defined as assistance provided by a federal agency, either directly or indirectly, in the form of grants, contracts, cooperative agreements, loans, loan guarantees, property, interest subsidies, insurance, or direct appropriations. Accordingly, nonmonetary federal assistance, including federal surplus property, is included in federal financial assistance and is reported on the Schedule (if applicable). Federal financial assistance does not include direct federal cash assistance to individuals. Solicited contracts between the Organization and the federal government for which the federal government procures tangible goods or services are not considered to be federal financial assistance. Major Programs: The Uniform Guidance establishes criteria to be used in defining major programs. Major programs are those programs selected for testing using a risk-assessment model, as well as certain minimum expenditure requirements, as outlined in the Uniform Guidance Subpart F 200.518. Programs with similar requirements may be grouped into a cluster for testing purposes. Basis of Accounting: Receipts and expenditures are accounted for using the accrual basis of accounting. Revenues are recorded when earned or, in the case of grants where expenditures are the prime factor for determining eligibility, when the expenditure is made. Expenditures are recorded when a liability is incurred. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: The Organization elected to use the ten percent (10%) de minimis indirect cost rate of modified total direct costs. A definition of modified total direct costs can be found in the Uniform Guidance Subpart A 200.1. The Organization maintains insurance coverage as recommended by its insurance agent of record.

Finding Details

2022-001 Utilization of a Cost Plus a Percentage of Cost Contract Type: Significant deficiency in internal control over compliance and an instance of noncompliance with respect to procurement requirements. Federal program: AL# 21.027, Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds. Criteria: The Organization is obligated to comply with the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards at 2 C.F.R. Part 200, of which paragraph 200.324(d) states that the cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used. Questioned costs: $41,208; calculated as vendor's profit based on 4.75% of the actual construction cost of $867,532 per vendor invoices. Total cost reimbursement form the contract was $882,713 after retention credit of $26,028. Condition: The Organization entered into a cost plus a percentage of cost contract with a vendor for the renovation of its Redmond location and was unaware that such a contract provision was not allowed. Effect: The Organization was out of compliance with 2 C.F.R. ? 200.324(d). Cause: The construction contract was executed before the federal grant was awarded. The construction contract was signed on May 21, 2021 and was initially projected to be funded by non-federal grants and contributions. Deschutes County grant agreement came at a later date on December 27, 2021, and awarded the Organization a reimbursement of their remodeling expenditures up to $900,000. The Organization did not have sufficient internal controls in place to identify the noncompliance when the federal grant was awarded, as management was unaware of the procurement prohibition on cost plus a percentage of cost contracting method. Prevalence: This is an internal control design deficiency and an instance of immaterial noncompliance resulting in questioned costs of $41,208. Repeat finding: No. Auditor?s recommendation: Work closely with the Organization?s assigned Deschutes County project officer to communicate and establish a corrective action plan to address the noncompliance. The Organization?s response: Management agrees with the auditor's recommendation. The Organization will work closely with the Deschutes County project officer to address and demonstrate compliance for the condition listed above. The Organization has developed a Corrective Action Plan which outlines the necessary steps the Organization will follow to bring the Organization into compliance with the condition. Management has reviewed this finding in detail with the Finance & Audit Committee, and subsequently presented this to the Board of Directors who voted to approve the Audit and associated response and Corrective Action Plan.
2022-001 Utilization of a Cost Plus a Percentage of Cost Contract Type: Significant deficiency in internal control over compliance and an instance of noncompliance with respect to procurement requirements. Federal program: AL# 21.027, Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds. Criteria: The Organization is obligated to comply with the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards at 2 C.F.R. Part 200, of which paragraph 200.324(d) states that the cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used. Questioned costs: $41,208; calculated as vendor's profit based on 4.75% of the actual construction cost of $867,532 per vendor invoices. Total cost reimbursement form the contract was $882,713 after retention credit of $26,028. Condition: The Organization entered into a cost plus a percentage of cost contract with a vendor for the renovation of its Redmond location and was unaware that such a contract provision was not allowed. Effect: The Organization was out of compliance with 2 C.F.R. ? 200.324(d). Cause: The construction contract was executed before the federal grant was awarded. The construction contract was signed on May 21, 2021 and was initially projected to be funded by non-federal grants and contributions. Deschutes County grant agreement came at a later date on December 27, 2021, and awarded the Organization a reimbursement of their remodeling expenditures up to $900,000. The Organization did not have sufficient internal controls in place to identify the noncompliance when the federal grant was awarded, as management was unaware of the procurement prohibition on cost plus a percentage of cost contracting method. Prevalence: This is an internal control design deficiency and an instance of immaterial noncompliance resulting in questioned costs of $41,208. Repeat finding: No. Auditor?s recommendation: Work closely with the Organization?s assigned Deschutes County project officer to communicate and establish a corrective action plan to address the noncompliance. The Organization?s response: Management agrees with the auditor's recommendation. The Organization will work closely with the Deschutes County project officer to address and demonstrate compliance for the condition listed above. The Organization has developed a Corrective Action Plan which outlines the necessary steps the Organization will follow to bring the Organization into compliance with the condition. Management has reviewed this finding in detail with the Finance & Audit Committee, and subsequently presented this to the Board of Directors who voted to approve the Audit and associated response and Corrective Action Plan.