Audit 7783

FY End
2023-06-30
Total Expended
$3.37M
Findings
6
Programs
9
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2023-12-20

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
5730 2023-003 Significant Deficiency - N
5731 2023-003 Significant Deficiency - N
5732 2023-003 Significant Deficiency - N
582172 2023-003 Significant Deficiency - N
582173 2023-003 Significant Deficiency - N
582174 2023-003 Significant Deficiency - N

Programs

Contacts

Name Title Type
ML69JMFAGJ35 Joshua Ziegler Auditee
2188355203 Tracee Bruggeman Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Note 3 Basis for Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported in the accounting schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. The Schedule includes the federal award activity of Independent School District No. 32 under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2023. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of Independent School District No. 32, it is not intended to be and does not present the financial position or changes in net position of Independent School District No. 32.
Title: Note 4 Commodity Distribution Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported in the accounting schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. Nonmonetary assistance is reported in the schedule at the fair market value of the commodities received and disbursed.
Title: Note 5 Pass-Through Entities Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported in the accounting schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. All pass-through entities listed on the previous page use the same AL numbers as the federal grantors to identify these grants and have not assigned any additional identifying numbers.
Title: Note 6 Subrecipients Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported in the accounting schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. During the year ended June 30, 2023, the District did not pass any federal money to subrecipients.

Finding Details

Federal Program: Education Stabilization Fund (AL 84.425) Wage Rate Requirements Criteria:Uniform Guidance stated “the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls)”. Condition: We noted during inquiry and testing that contractors were not being required to submit their certified payrolls on a weekly basis to the engineering firm that oversaw the construction of the technical building. Furthermore, we noted vendors that were not under the scope of the engineer did not submit the required certified payrolls directly to the district. Questioned Costs: None Context : During internal control inquire we noted that contractors were required to submit all certified payrolls for their first pay application and if they were correct, they were not required to submit them again until the end of the project. We tested a total of 14 certified payrolls and were able to verify that 2 were submitted 7 months after the ending work week, 1 was 5 months after, and another was 3 months after. We also noted that one vendor that was not under the scope of the engineer but dealt directly with the district did not submit any certified payrolls. Cause: Oversight by management. Effect: The required certified payrolls were not being submitted per federal requirements. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: The District should implement policies and procedures to ensure any vendor that is required to submit certified payrolls are submitting them every week, when work is performed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The District agrees with the recommendation and will review its policies and procedures.
Federal Program: Education Stabilization Fund (AL 84.425) Wage Rate Requirements Criteria:Uniform Guidance stated “the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls)”. Condition: We noted during inquiry and testing that contractors were not being required to submit their certified payrolls on a weekly basis to the engineering firm that oversaw the construction of the technical building. Furthermore, we noted vendors that were not under the scope of the engineer did not submit the required certified payrolls directly to the district. Questioned Costs: None Context : During internal control inquire we noted that contractors were required to submit all certified payrolls for their first pay application and if they were correct, they were not required to submit them again until the end of the project. We tested a total of 14 certified payrolls and were able to verify that 2 were submitted 7 months after the ending work week, 1 was 5 months after, and another was 3 months after. We also noted that one vendor that was not under the scope of the engineer but dealt directly with the district did not submit any certified payrolls. Cause: Oversight by management. Effect: The required certified payrolls were not being submitted per federal requirements. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: The District should implement policies and procedures to ensure any vendor that is required to submit certified payrolls are submitting them every week, when work is performed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The District agrees with the recommendation and will review its policies and procedures.
Federal Program: Education Stabilization Fund (AL 84.425) Wage Rate Requirements Criteria:Uniform Guidance stated “the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls)”. Condition: We noted during inquiry and testing that contractors were not being required to submit their certified payrolls on a weekly basis to the engineering firm that oversaw the construction of the technical building. Furthermore, we noted vendors that were not under the scope of the engineer did not submit the required certified payrolls directly to the district. Questioned Costs: None Context : During internal control inquire we noted that contractors were required to submit all certified payrolls for their first pay application and if they were correct, they were not required to submit them again until the end of the project. We tested a total of 14 certified payrolls and were able to verify that 2 were submitted 7 months after the ending work week, 1 was 5 months after, and another was 3 months after. We also noted that one vendor that was not under the scope of the engineer but dealt directly with the district did not submit any certified payrolls. Cause: Oversight by management. Effect: The required certified payrolls were not being submitted per federal requirements. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: The District should implement policies and procedures to ensure any vendor that is required to submit certified payrolls are submitting them every week, when work is performed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The District agrees with the recommendation and will review its policies and procedures.
Federal Program: Education Stabilization Fund (AL 84.425) Wage Rate Requirements Criteria:Uniform Guidance stated “the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls)”. Condition: We noted during inquiry and testing that contractors were not being required to submit their certified payrolls on a weekly basis to the engineering firm that oversaw the construction of the technical building. Furthermore, we noted vendors that were not under the scope of the engineer did not submit the required certified payrolls directly to the district. Questioned Costs: None Context : During internal control inquire we noted that contractors were required to submit all certified payrolls for their first pay application and if they were correct, they were not required to submit them again until the end of the project. We tested a total of 14 certified payrolls and were able to verify that 2 were submitted 7 months after the ending work week, 1 was 5 months after, and another was 3 months after. We also noted that one vendor that was not under the scope of the engineer but dealt directly with the district did not submit any certified payrolls. Cause: Oversight by management. Effect: The required certified payrolls were not being submitted per federal requirements. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: The District should implement policies and procedures to ensure any vendor that is required to submit certified payrolls are submitting them every week, when work is performed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The District agrees with the recommendation and will review its policies and procedures.
Federal Program: Education Stabilization Fund (AL 84.425) Wage Rate Requirements Criteria:Uniform Guidance stated “the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls)”. Condition: We noted during inquiry and testing that contractors were not being required to submit their certified payrolls on a weekly basis to the engineering firm that oversaw the construction of the technical building. Furthermore, we noted vendors that were not under the scope of the engineer did not submit the required certified payrolls directly to the district. Questioned Costs: None Context : During internal control inquire we noted that contractors were required to submit all certified payrolls for their first pay application and if they were correct, they were not required to submit them again until the end of the project. We tested a total of 14 certified payrolls and were able to verify that 2 were submitted 7 months after the ending work week, 1 was 5 months after, and another was 3 months after. We also noted that one vendor that was not under the scope of the engineer but dealt directly with the district did not submit any certified payrolls. Cause: Oversight by management. Effect: The required certified payrolls were not being submitted per federal requirements. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: The District should implement policies and procedures to ensure any vendor that is required to submit certified payrolls are submitting them every week, when work is performed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The District agrees with the recommendation and will review its policies and procedures.
Federal Program: Education Stabilization Fund (AL 84.425) Wage Rate Requirements Criteria:Uniform Guidance stated “the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls)”. Condition: We noted during inquiry and testing that contractors were not being required to submit their certified payrolls on a weekly basis to the engineering firm that oversaw the construction of the technical building. Furthermore, we noted vendors that were not under the scope of the engineer did not submit the required certified payrolls directly to the district. Questioned Costs: None Context : During internal control inquire we noted that contractors were required to submit all certified payrolls for their first pay application and if they were correct, they were not required to submit them again until the end of the project. We tested a total of 14 certified payrolls and were able to verify that 2 were submitted 7 months after the ending work week, 1 was 5 months after, and another was 3 months after. We also noted that one vendor that was not under the scope of the engineer but dealt directly with the district did not submit any certified payrolls. Cause: Oversight by management. Effect: The required certified payrolls were not being submitted per federal requirements. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: The District should implement policies and procedures to ensure any vendor that is required to submit certified payrolls are submitting them every week, when work is performed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The District agrees with the recommendation and will review its policies and procedures.