Audit 7684

FY End
2023-06-30
Total Expended
$18.30M
Findings
4
Programs
9
Organization: Buena Vista University (IA)
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2023-12-20
Auditor: Forvis LLP

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
5693 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - N
5694 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - N
582135 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - N
582136 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - N

Contacts

Name Title Type
FJHKC4XNMED8 Courtney Berg Auditee
7127492057 Kieth McGovern Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule, if any, represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The University has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the “Schedule”) includes the federal award activity of the University under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2023. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the University, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets or cash flows of the University.
Title: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule, if any, represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The University has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule, if any, represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years.
Title: Indirect Cost Rate Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule, if any, represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The University has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The University has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance.
Title: Federal Loan Program Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule, if any, represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The University has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The federal loan program listed subsequently is administered directly by the University, and balances and transactions relating to this program are included in the University’s basic consolidated financial statements. Loans outstanding at the beginning of the year are included in the federal expenditures presented in the Schedule. The balance of loans outstanding at June 30, 2023, consists of Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.038 Federal Perkins Loan Program $544,838

Finding Details

Student Financial Assistance Cluster U.S. Department of Education Federal Student Direct Loans CFDA 84.268 Federal Pell Grant Program 84.063 Award Year 2023 Criteria or Specific Requirement – Special Tests and Provisions: Enrollment Reporting Pell, 34 CFR 690.83(b)(2); Direct Loan, 34 CFR 685.309. Federal regulations require the institution to notify the Department of Education of changes in s tudent enrollment information at the Campus Level and Program Level in a timely and accurate manner. These changes include reductions or increases in attendance levels, withdrawals, graduations, drop outs, or enrolled but never attended during the audit period. Institutions are responsible for timely reporting, whether they report directly or via a third-party service. Additionally, institutions are required to accurately report the student’s Campus-Level and Program-Level enrollment data. Condition – The University did not ensure accurate and timely notification to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) of student status changes and program-level enrollment data. Questioned Costs – None. Context – Out of a population of 588 student enrollment status changes requiring notification, a sample of 25 students were selected for testing. Out of these 25 students, there were 15 selected where the campus and program-level record information was not in agreement between the NSLDS and the campus level information. Out of these 25 students selected for testing, there were seven instances in which the student's status change was reported after the 60 day requirement. The sample was not, and was not intended to be, a statistically valid sample. Effect – The NSLDS was not notified of the student enrollment status or program-level records on a timely and accurate basis. Cause – Management oversight during a status update report submission. Identification as a Repeat Finding – N/A Recommendation – The University should review and update its processes and controls to ensure student status changes for program-level records are reported to the NSLDS in a timely and accurate manner. Additionally, we recommend that a formal reconciliation process is completed to validate the procedure is completed on a regular basis. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions – The software cause of the re-reporting of graduate students as enrolled has not been determined. All mid-term graduates prior to March 2023 worked correctly and those that graduated from July 2023 onward all worked correctly. Reports have been created to mid-term graduates and students beginning another program immediately after degree completion.
Student Financial Assistance Cluster U.S. Department of Education Federal Student Direct Loans CFDA 84.268 Federal Pell Grant Program 84.063 Award Year 2023 Criteria or Specific Requirement – Special Tests and Provisions: Enrollment Reporting Pell, 34 CFR 690.83(b)(2); Direct Loan, 34 CFR 685.309. Federal regulations require the institution to notify the Department of Education of changes in s tudent enrollment information at the Campus Level and Program Level in a timely and accurate manner. These changes include reductions or increases in attendance levels, withdrawals, graduations, drop outs, or enrolled but never attended during the audit period. Institutions are responsible for timely reporting, whether they report directly or via a third-party service. Additionally, institutions are required to accurately report the student’s Campus-Level and Program-Level enrollment data. Condition – The University did not ensure accurate and timely notification to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) of student status changes and program-level enrollment data. Questioned Costs – None. Context – Out of a population of 588 student enrollment status changes requiring notification, a sample of 25 students were selected for testing. Out of these 25 students, there were 15 selected where the campus and program-level record information was not in agreement between the NSLDS and the campus level information. Out of these 25 students selected for testing, there were seven instances in which the student's status change was reported after the 60 day requirement. The sample was not, and was not intended to be, a statistically valid sample. Effect – The NSLDS was not notified of the student enrollment status or program-level records on a timely and accurate basis. Cause – Management oversight during a status update report submission. Identification as a Repeat Finding – N/A Recommendation – The University should review and update its processes and controls to ensure student status changes for program-level records are reported to the NSLDS in a timely and accurate manner. Additionally, we recommend that a formal reconciliation process is completed to validate the procedure is completed on a regular basis. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions – The software cause of the re-reporting of graduate students as enrolled has not been determined. All mid-term graduates prior to March 2023 worked correctly and those that graduated from July 2023 onward all worked correctly. Reports have been created to mid-term graduates and students beginning another program immediately after degree completion.
Student Financial Assistance Cluster U.S. Department of Education Federal Student Direct Loans CFDA 84.268 Federal Pell Grant Program 84.063 Award Year 2023 Criteria or Specific Requirement – Special Tests and Provisions: Enrollment Reporting Pell, 34 CFR 690.83(b)(2); Direct Loan, 34 CFR 685.309. Federal regulations require the institution to notify the Department of Education of changes in s tudent enrollment information at the Campus Level and Program Level in a timely and accurate manner. These changes include reductions or increases in attendance levels, withdrawals, graduations, drop outs, or enrolled but never attended during the audit period. Institutions are responsible for timely reporting, whether they report directly or via a third-party service. Additionally, institutions are required to accurately report the student’s Campus-Level and Program-Level enrollment data. Condition – The University did not ensure accurate and timely notification to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) of student status changes and program-level enrollment data. Questioned Costs – None. Context – Out of a population of 588 student enrollment status changes requiring notification, a sample of 25 students were selected for testing. Out of these 25 students, there were 15 selected where the campus and program-level record information was not in agreement between the NSLDS and the campus level information. Out of these 25 students selected for testing, there were seven instances in which the student's status change was reported after the 60 day requirement. The sample was not, and was not intended to be, a statistically valid sample. Effect – The NSLDS was not notified of the student enrollment status or program-level records on a timely and accurate basis. Cause – Management oversight during a status update report submission. Identification as a Repeat Finding – N/A Recommendation – The University should review and update its processes and controls to ensure student status changes for program-level records are reported to the NSLDS in a timely and accurate manner. Additionally, we recommend that a formal reconciliation process is completed to validate the procedure is completed on a regular basis. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions – The software cause of the re-reporting of graduate students as enrolled has not been determined. All mid-term graduates prior to March 2023 worked correctly and those that graduated from July 2023 onward all worked correctly. Reports have been created to mid-term graduates and students beginning another program immediately after degree completion.
Student Financial Assistance Cluster U.S. Department of Education Federal Student Direct Loans CFDA 84.268 Federal Pell Grant Program 84.063 Award Year 2023 Criteria or Specific Requirement – Special Tests and Provisions: Enrollment Reporting Pell, 34 CFR 690.83(b)(2); Direct Loan, 34 CFR 685.309. Federal regulations require the institution to notify the Department of Education of changes in s tudent enrollment information at the Campus Level and Program Level in a timely and accurate manner. These changes include reductions or increases in attendance levels, withdrawals, graduations, drop outs, or enrolled but never attended during the audit period. Institutions are responsible for timely reporting, whether they report directly or via a third-party service. Additionally, institutions are required to accurately report the student’s Campus-Level and Program-Level enrollment data. Condition – The University did not ensure accurate and timely notification to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) of student status changes and program-level enrollment data. Questioned Costs – None. Context – Out of a population of 588 student enrollment status changes requiring notification, a sample of 25 students were selected for testing. Out of these 25 students, there were 15 selected where the campus and program-level record information was not in agreement between the NSLDS and the campus level information. Out of these 25 students selected for testing, there were seven instances in which the student's status change was reported after the 60 day requirement. The sample was not, and was not intended to be, a statistically valid sample. Effect – The NSLDS was not notified of the student enrollment status or program-level records on a timely and accurate basis. Cause – Management oversight during a status update report submission. Identification as a Repeat Finding – N/A Recommendation – The University should review and update its processes and controls to ensure student status changes for program-level records are reported to the NSLDS in a timely and accurate manner. Additionally, we recommend that a formal reconciliation process is completed to validate the procedure is completed on a regular basis. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions – The software cause of the re-reporting of graduate students as enrolled has not been determined. All mid-term graduates prior to March 2023 worked correctly and those that graduated from July 2023 onward all worked correctly. Reports have been created to mid-term graduates and students beginning another program immediately after degree completion.