Audit 6255

FY End
2023-06-30
Total Expended
$2.74M
Findings
2
Programs
1
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2023-12-12

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
3973 2023-001 - - B
580415 2023-001 - - B

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
14.181 Supportive Housing for Persons with Disabilities $102,777 Yes 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
QRTRE6BBNAU6 Les Russo Auditee
8474245601 Brian Baker Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: BASIS OF PRESENTATION Accounting Policies: NOTE B – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Harvard Supportive Housing, Inc. has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards includes the federal award activity of Harvard Supportive Housing, Inc., HUD Project No. 071-HD154, and is presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of Harvard Supportive Housing, Inc., it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of Harvard Supportive Housing, Inc.
Title: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT LOAN PROGRAM Accounting Policies: NOTE B – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Harvard Supportive Housing, Inc. has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. There are no HUD loans in this Project.

Finding Details

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT FINDING 2023-001: SECTION 811, ASSISTANCE LISTING NUMBER 14.181 Condition: The Project overpaid management fees to the management company. Criteria: The management company should calculate management fees using the correct formula. Effect: The Project's management fee expense is overstated. Context: The management fee for the year was tested for accuracy. The test determined that the management fee percentage for the year needed to be revised. The details and results of the sample are as follows: Population -1, $14,940, Sample - 1, $14,940, Not in Compliance - 1, $14,940, Questioned Costs $1,398, Cause: The management company did not compute the management fee correctly. Recommendation: The management company should repay the $1,398 to the Project. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Project agrees with the finding. The management company will repay the overpaid management fees as soon as possible. Questioned Costs - Department of Housing and Urban Development Questioned Costs $1,398, Non-compliance code - J
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT FINDING 2023-001: SECTION 811, ASSISTANCE LISTING NUMBER 14.181 Condition: The Project overpaid management fees to the management company. Criteria: The management company should calculate management fees using the correct formula. Effect: The Project's management fee expense is overstated. Context: The management fee for the year was tested for accuracy. The test determined that the management fee percentage for the year needed to be revised. The details and results of the sample are as follows: Population -1, $14,940, Sample - 1, $14,940, Not in Compliance - 1, $14,940, Questioned Costs $1,398, Cause: The management company did not compute the management fee correctly. Recommendation: The management company should repay the $1,398 to the Project. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Project agrees with the finding. The management company will repay the overpaid management fees as soon as possible. Questioned Costs - Department of Housing and Urban Development Questioned Costs $1,398, Non-compliance code - J