Audit 62

FY End
2023-01-31
Total Expended
$5.17M
Findings
4
Programs
4
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2023-10-16

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
67 2023-001 Significant Deficiency Yes B
68 2023-001 Significant Deficiency Yes B
576509 2023-001 Significant Deficiency Yes B
576510 2023-001 Significant Deficiency Yes B

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
93.600 Head Start $302,816 Yes 1
10.558 Child and Adult Care Food Program $272,866 - 0
93.556 Promoting Safe and Stable Families $117,207 - 0
14.231 Emergency Solutions Grant Program $26,924 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
V1CETLLGDUC6 Carlos Valles Auditee
5036754565 Karin Wandtke Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the schedule) includes all federal grant activity of Clackamas County Children's Commission under programs of the federal government for the year ended January 31, 2023. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of the Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of Clackamas County Children's Commission, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets or cash flows of Clackamas County Children's Commission. Expenditures reported on the schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Organization did not utilize the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate. The contract requires that all expenses be allocated on a reasonable basis. No separate indirect cost rate is required.

Finding Details

Criteria: There should be documented support and review of system allocations by an appropriate member of management other than the preparer prior to posting in the accounting system. Condition: There was inconsistent documentation of allocation rates for an invoice charged to the grant. Allocations other than the rates determined by management were used for one out of forty nonpayroll expenses. There were fewer exceptions noted this year than in the prior year. Cause: The Organization’s control policies for review of allocation rates used were not consistently followed. Effect: Invoice allocations may be charged inaccurately to awards and incorrect amounts could be billed. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: System allocations should be reviewed regularly by an appropriate member of management and invoice allocations should be consistent with the approved allocations. Management's Response The error identified related to a recurring accounts payable invoice template that is available to, and pending in, future accounting periods and posted monthly.  The recurring invoice template was not updated at the time the distribution code was changed for current allocation rates.  The template has since been updated. We will continue to review the transactions prior to posting in the accounting system to correct any errors.
Criteria: There should be documented support and review of system allocations by an appropriate member of management other than the preparer prior to posting in the accounting system. Condition: There was inconsistent documentation of allocation rates for an invoice charged to the grant. Allocations other than the rates determined by management were used for one out of forty nonpayroll expenses. There were fewer exceptions noted this year than in the prior year. Cause: The Organization’s control policies for review of allocation rates used were not consistently followed. Effect: Invoice allocations may be charged inaccurately to awards and incorrect amounts could be billed. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: System allocations should be reviewed regularly by an appropriate member of management and invoice allocations should be consistent with the approved allocations. Management's Response The error identified related to a recurring accounts payable invoice template that is available to, and pending in, future accounting periods and posted monthly.  The recurring invoice template was not updated at the time the distribution code was changed for current allocation rates.  The template has since been updated. We will continue to review the transactions prior to posting in the accounting system to correct any errors.
Criteria: There should be documented support and review of system allocations by an appropriate member of management other than the preparer prior to posting in the accounting system. Condition: There was inconsistent documentation of allocation rates for an invoice charged to the grant. Allocations other than the rates determined by management were used for one out of forty nonpayroll expenses. There were fewer exceptions noted this year than in the prior year. Cause: The Organization’s control policies for review of allocation rates used were not consistently followed. Effect: Invoice allocations may be charged inaccurately to awards and incorrect amounts could be billed. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: System allocations should be reviewed regularly by an appropriate member of management and invoice allocations should be consistent with the approved allocations. Management's Response The error identified related to a recurring accounts payable invoice template that is available to, and pending in, future accounting periods and posted monthly.  The recurring invoice template was not updated at the time the distribution code was changed for current allocation rates.  The template has since been updated. We will continue to review the transactions prior to posting in the accounting system to correct any errors.
Criteria: There should be documented support and review of system allocations by an appropriate member of management other than the preparer prior to posting in the accounting system. Condition: There was inconsistent documentation of allocation rates for an invoice charged to the grant. Allocations other than the rates determined by management were used for one out of forty nonpayroll expenses. There were fewer exceptions noted this year than in the prior year. Cause: The Organization’s control policies for review of allocation rates used were not consistently followed. Effect: Invoice allocations may be charged inaccurately to awards and incorrect amounts could be billed. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: System allocations should be reviewed regularly by an appropriate member of management and invoice allocations should be consistent with the approved allocations. Management's Response The error identified related to a recurring accounts payable invoice template that is available to, and pending in, future accounting periods and posted monthly.  The recurring invoice template was not updated at the time the distribution code was changed for current allocation rates.  The template has since been updated. We will continue to review the transactions prior to posting in the accounting system to correct any errors.