Audit 6129

FY End
2023-06-30
Total Expended
$924,263
Findings
2
Programs
11
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2023-12-11

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
3879 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - N
580321 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - N

Contacts

Name Title Type
SL1XTMR1LN13 Delia Presillas Auditee
2815309406 Stephanie E. Harris, Cpa, Cgma Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the SEFA are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. These expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the SEFA, if any, represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Charter Holder has elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

Criteria: All laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor. Nonfederal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (which still may be referenced as the Davis-Bacon Act) a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contacts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction). This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance. The non-Federal entity must place a copy of the current prevailing wage determination issued by the Department of Labor in each solicitation. The decision to award a contract or subcontract must be conditioned upon the acceptance of the wage determination. Condition: The Charter Holder did not include in the solicitations for proposals, or the construction contract the Wage Rate Requirement clauses. As a result, the general contractor did not submit to the Charter Holder the required certified payroll reports for each week in which work was performed under the contract. Cause: The request for proposals (RFP) and contract between the Charter Holder and the general contractor did not include the Wage Rate Requirements from the Davis-Bacon Act because the RFP was issued in November 2022 and the contract was awarded in March 2023. The Charter Holder requested for a grant budget amendment in February 2023 after learning that ESSER funds could be used for HVAC improvements with the prior approval from the Texas Education Agency (TEA). The amended grant budget was approved in March 2023 by TEA to use ESSER III funds for the HVAC project in the amount of $68,190, which was a component of a construction project which was already underway. The Charter Holder was unaware of the Wage Rate Requirements for construction projects that are federally funded. In addition, the Charter Holder did not have sufficient controls in place over the Wage Rate Requirements to ensure those charged with project/grant administration complied. Effect: Noncompliance with the requirements of 29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contacts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction. Recommendation: The Charter Holder should contact the TEA to determine any remedial steps related to this finding. For futureconstruction projects that are funded with federal funds, the Charter Holder should ensure compliance with all Wage Rate Requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria: All laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor. Nonfederal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (which still may be referenced as the Davis-Bacon Act) a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contacts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction). This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance. The non-Federal entity must place a copy of the current prevailing wage determination issued by the Department of Labor in each solicitation. The decision to award a contract or subcontract must be conditioned upon the acceptance of the wage determination. Condition: The Charter Holder did not include in the solicitations for proposals, or the construction contract the Wage Rate Requirement clauses. As a result, the general contractor did not submit to the Charter Holder the required certified payroll reports for each week in which work was performed under the contract. Cause: The request for proposals (RFP) and contract between the Charter Holder and the general contractor did not include the Wage Rate Requirements from the Davis-Bacon Act because the RFP was issued in November 2022 and the contract was awarded in March 2023. The Charter Holder requested for a grant budget amendment in February 2023 after learning that ESSER funds could be used for HVAC improvements with the prior approval from the Texas Education Agency (TEA). The amended grant budget was approved in March 2023 by TEA to use ESSER III funds for the HVAC project in the amount of $68,190, which was a component of a construction project which was already underway. The Charter Holder was unaware of the Wage Rate Requirements for construction projects that are federally funded. In addition, the Charter Holder did not have sufficient controls in place over the Wage Rate Requirements to ensure those charged with project/grant administration complied. Effect: Noncompliance with the requirements of 29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contacts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction. Recommendation: The Charter Holder should contact the TEA to determine any remedial steps related to this finding. For futureconstruction projects that are funded with federal funds, the Charter Holder should ensure compliance with all Wage Rate Requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.