Audit 56439

FY End
2022-03-31
Total Expended
$5.26M
Findings
2
Programs
3
Organization: Haverhill Housing Authority (MA)
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2022-12-12
Auditor: Marcum LLP

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
60561 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - N
637003 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - N

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
14.871 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers $4.71M Yes 0
14.871 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers - Cares Act $304,749 Yes 1
14.267 Continuum of Care Program $249,474 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
HYEMTCKV2ZX1 Clara Ruiz Vargas Auditee
9783726761 Michael Guyder Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: NOTE 1 BASIS OF PRESENTATIONThe accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the schedule) includes the federal grant activity of Haverhill Housing Authority, under programs of the federal government for the year ended March 31, 2022. The information in the schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirement, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of Haverhill Housing Authority, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net position or cash flows of Haverhill Housing Authority.NOTE 2 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIESExpenditures reported on the schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. For cost-reimbursement awards, such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. For performance-based awards, expenditures reportedrepresent amounts earned. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate.

Finding Details

2022-001 ? SPECIAL TESTS AND PROVISIONS ? CARES ACT FUNDING Other Matter/Significant Deficiency U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development CFDA #: 14.871 ? Housing Choice Voucher Program ? CARES Act CRITERIA The funding provided through this notice may only be used for current year eligible HAP expenses. HAP funding cannot be used for the repayment of debts or any amounts owed to HUD by HUD program participants including, but not limited to, Office of Inspector General (OIG), Quality Assurance Division (QAD) or other monitoring review findings. HAP cannot be used for Administrative Fee purposes. (PIH Notice 2020-17) CONDITION As identified by HUD during its QAD review, the Authority used $47,901 of the supplemental HAP funding for ineligible expenses of disallowed rent payments and unauthorized rent increases. CAUSE The Authority did not fully understand the eligible uses of the supplemental HAP funding. EFFECT The Authority had used the supplemental HAP funding for ineligible expenses. QUESTIONED COSTS None identified as this matter was addressed with HUD. CONTEXT The Authority received 1 increment of supplement CARES Act funding of $161,440. This was not a statistically valid sample. REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding RECOMMENDATION The Authority should develop a CARES Act training program for staff which would include a review of eligible uses of both the supplemental administrative fee and HAP funding. The Authority should continue with their corrective action plan submitted to HUD in response to the QAD review. AUDITEE?S RESPONSE AND PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTION See Corrective Action Plan.
2022-001 ? SPECIAL TESTS AND PROVISIONS ? CARES ACT FUNDING Other Matter/Significant Deficiency U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development CFDA #: 14.871 ? Housing Choice Voucher Program ? CARES Act CRITERIA The funding provided through this notice may only be used for current year eligible HAP expenses. HAP funding cannot be used for the repayment of debts or any amounts owed to HUD by HUD program participants including, but not limited to, Office of Inspector General (OIG), Quality Assurance Division (QAD) or other monitoring review findings. HAP cannot be used for Administrative Fee purposes. (PIH Notice 2020-17) CONDITION As identified by HUD during its QAD review, the Authority used $47,901 of the supplemental HAP funding for ineligible expenses of disallowed rent payments and unauthorized rent increases. CAUSE The Authority did not fully understand the eligible uses of the supplemental HAP funding. EFFECT The Authority had used the supplemental HAP funding for ineligible expenses. QUESTIONED COSTS None identified as this matter was addressed with HUD. CONTEXT The Authority received 1 increment of supplement CARES Act funding of $161,440. This was not a statistically valid sample. REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding RECOMMENDATION The Authority should develop a CARES Act training program for staff which would include a review of eligible uses of both the supplemental administrative fee and HAP funding. The Authority should continue with their corrective action plan submitted to HUD in response to the QAD review. AUDITEE?S RESPONSE AND PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTION See Corrective Action Plan.