Audit 56332

FY End
2022-09-30
Total Expended
$812,391
Findings
4
Programs
7
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-05-21

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
60339 2022-003 Significant Deficiency - C
60340 2022-003 Significant Deficiency - C
636781 2022-003 Significant Deficiency - C
636782 2022-003 Significant Deficiency - C

Contacts

Name Title Type
QUYPA5J8D8G4 Carol Godwin Auditee
8508339500 Joel Bradley Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: BASIS OF PRESENTATION Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Therefore, some amounts presented in the Schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the basic financial statements. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal award activity of the City of Fort Walton Beach, Florida (the City), under programs of the federal government for the year ended September 30, 2022. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the City, it is not intended to, and does not, present the financial position, changes in net position, or cash flows of the City.

Finding Details

Criteria 2 CFR Section 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the awards are being managed in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Condition The City was unable to provide documentary evidence illustrating its adherence to its written grant administration policies pertaining to supervisory review of grant reimbursement requests prepared by City staff prior to submission to the grant funding agency. Cause Grant reimbursement requests were not properly reviewed on a timely basis by supervisory personnel. Effect Key controls over compliance with federal award programs were not functioning as designed. Context There were two instances in which the City submitted a reimbursement request for costs previously reimbursed by the grant funding agency under the federal award. However, the funds requested in error were subsequently discovered and returned to the grant funding agency. Questioned Costs None Recommendation The City should adhere to its written policies and procedures regarding supervisory review of grant reimbursement requests. In addition, we recommend that employees preparing and reviewing reimbursement requests initial or sign off on the payroll reports to provide evidence of their actions.
Criteria 2 CFR Section 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the awards are being managed in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Condition The City was unable to provide documentary evidence illustrating its adherence to its written grant administration policies pertaining to supervisory review of grant reimbursement requests prepared by City staff prior to submission to the grant funding agency. Cause Grant reimbursement requests were not properly reviewed on a timely basis by supervisory personnel. Effect Key controls over compliance with federal award programs were not functioning as designed. Context There were two instances in which the City submitted a reimbursement request for costs previously reimbursed by the grant funding agency under the federal award. However, the funds requested in error were subsequently discovered and returned to the grant funding agency. Questioned Costs None Recommendation The City should adhere to its written policies and procedures regarding supervisory review of grant reimbursement requests. In addition, we recommend that employees preparing and reviewing reimbursement requests initial or sign off on the payroll reports to provide evidence of their actions.
Criteria 2 CFR Section 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the awards are being managed in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Condition The City was unable to provide documentary evidence illustrating its adherence to its written grant administration policies pertaining to supervisory review of grant reimbursement requests prepared by City staff prior to submission to the grant funding agency. Cause Grant reimbursement requests were not properly reviewed on a timely basis by supervisory personnel. Effect Key controls over compliance with federal award programs were not functioning as designed. Context There were two instances in which the City submitted a reimbursement request for costs previously reimbursed by the grant funding agency under the federal award. However, the funds requested in error were subsequently discovered and returned to the grant funding agency. Questioned Costs None Recommendation The City should adhere to its written policies and procedures regarding supervisory review of grant reimbursement requests. In addition, we recommend that employees preparing and reviewing reimbursement requests initial or sign off on the payroll reports to provide evidence of their actions.
Criteria 2 CFR Section 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the awards are being managed in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Condition The City was unable to provide documentary evidence illustrating its adherence to its written grant administration policies pertaining to supervisory review of grant reimbursement requests prepared by City staff prior to submission to the grant funding agency. Cause Grant reimbursement requests were not properly reviewed on a timely basis by supervisory personnel. Effect Key controls over compliance with federal award programs were not functioning as designed. Context There were two instances in which the City submitted a reimbursement request for costs previously reimbursed by the grant funding agency under the federal award. However, the funds requested in error were subsequently discovered and returned to the grant funding agency. Questioned Costs None Recommendation The City should adhere to its written policies and procedures regarding supervisory review of grant reimbursement requests. In addition, we recommend that employees preparing and reviewing reimbursement requests initial or sign off on the payroll reports to provide evidence of their actions.