Audit 56189

FY End
2022-06-30
Total Expended
$4.33M
Findings
32
Programs
5
Organization: Great Plains Food Bank (ND)
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-03-26
Auditor: Eide Bailly LLP

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
60631 2022-004 Significant Deficiency Yes AB
60632 2022-005 Significant Deficiency - E
60633 2022-006 Significant Deficiency - N
60634 2022-007 Material Weakness - AB
60635 2022-004 Significant Deficiency Yes AB
60636 2022-005 Significant Deficiency - E
60637 2022-006 Significant Deficiency - N
60638 2022-007 Material Weakness - AB
60639 2022-004 Significant Deficiency Yes AB
60640 2022-005 Significant Deficiency - E
60641 2022-007 Material Weakness - AB
60642 2022-004 Significant Deficiency Yes AB
60643 2022-005 Significant Deficiency - E
60644 2022-007 Material Weakness - AB
60645 2022-005 Significant Deficiency - E
60646 2022-005 Significant Deficiency - E
637073 2022-004 Significant Deficiency Yes AB
637074 2022-005 Significant Deficiency - E
637075 2022-006 Significant Deficiency - N
637076 2022-007 Material Weakness - AB
637077 2022-004 Significant Deficiency Yes AB
637078 2022-005 Significant Deficiency - E
637079 2022-006 Significant Deficiency - N
637080 2022-007 Material Weakness - AB
637081 2022-004 Significant Deficiency Yes AB
637082 2022-005 Significant Deficiency - E
637083 2022-007 Material Weakness - AB
637084 2022-004 Significant Deficiency Yes AB
637085 2022-005 Significant Deficiency - E
637086 2022-007 Material Weakness - AB
637087 2022-005 Significant Deficiency - E
637088 2022-005 Significant Deficiency - E

Contacts

Name Title Type
QF4QJ3NMQJG3 David Stachon Auditee
7014769103 Renee Gravalin Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures arerecognized following the cost principles of the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are notallowable or are limited as to reimbursement. No federal assistance has been provided to a subrecipient. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (Schedule) includes the federal award activity of Great Plains Food Bank (Organization) under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30,2022. The information is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Organization, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of the Organization.
Title: Agency or Pass-Through Number Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures arerecognized following the cost principles of the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are notallowable or are limited as to reimbursement. No federal assistance has been provided to a subrecipient. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. All pass-through entities have not provided us with identifying numbers; therefore, some are not included in this schedule.
Title: Food Donation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures arerecognized following the cost principles of the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are notallowable or are limited as to reimbursement. No federal assistance has been provided to a subrecipient. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. Nonmonetary assistance is reported in this schedule at the fair market value of the commodities received and disbursed. At June 30, 2022, the Organization had USDA food commodities totaling $539,370 in inventory.

Finding Details

2022-004 U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.565 All Awards Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.568 All Awards Food Distribution Cluster Activities Allowed/Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria ? A good system of internal controls includes a documented process to ensure that expenses with the potential to be charged to a federal program are allowable within the Uniform Guidance and grant requirements. Condition ? During review of invoices, it was identified that there were three expense transactions that were charged to accounts that were later allocated to federal programs that did not meet the requirements to be allowable within the grant requirements or under Uniform Guidance or were missing proper documentation of approval. Cause ? Due to oversight by management and lack of documented control processes, costs that are considered unallowable within the grant requirements were included in accounts determined to be allocated to the program for expenditure. Effect ? The Organization?s internal controls failed to ensure proper documentation of review and approval and identify costs that are not allowed within under the program. Questioned Costs ? None Reported. Context/Sampling ? A nonstatistical sample of 60 expenses out of a population of over 250 were selected for testing of allocated expenses. 3 out of the 60 transactions tested had an error. An additional nonstatistical sample of 8 expenses directly charged to CSFP out of a population of 26 were selected for testing. 1 out of the 8 transactions tested had an error. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s) ? Yes. Recommendation ? Management should implement internal controls to ensure all expenses are properly documented and approved to accounts that will be allocated at year-end are considered allowable. Views of Responsible Officials ? Management agrees with the finding.
2022-005 U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.565 All Awards Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.568 All Awards Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.569 All Awards Food Distribution Cluster Eligibility Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria ? A good system of internal controls includes a process to ensure that eligibility determinations for the program are appropriate. This includes a process to ensure proper completion of all tracking forms and documentation, including documented reviews. Condition ? During our review of the eligibility determinations, it was identified that there were two forms that were incomplete within the files, as they were missing signatures of participants or a documented review process. Cause ? Due to oversight by management, all forms were not completed and documented within participant files. Effect ? The Organization?s internal control process was not followed, resulting in lack of documentation of eligibility determination and no documented review process. However, it is noted that the individual participants and agencies were determined to be eligible for the program. Questioned Costs ? None Reported. Context/Sampling ? A nonstatistical sample of 60 participants within CSFP out of a population of over 250 were selected for eligibility testing. 1 out of the 60 eligibility determinations tested had an error. An additional nonstatistical sample of 29 participants within TEFAP out of a population of 146 were selected for eligibility testing. 1 out of the 29 eligibility determinations tested had an error. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s) ? No. Recommendation ? Management should implement internal controls to ensure all eligibility determination reviews are documented and retained in the file. Views of Responsible Officials ? Management agrees with the finding.
2022-006 U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.565 All Awards Food Distribution Cluster Special Tests and Provisions Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria ? A good system of internal controls includes a process to ensure that all inventory reports filed with various agencies are completed accurately and reviewed. Condition ? As part of our audit, it was identified that there was no formal documentation of the review process for inventory reports filed with various agencies. Cause ? Due to oversight of management involved with the process, no formal review has been documented or retained for the processes of the inventory reports being submitted to various agencies. Effect ? The failure to adequately review and document the review of the inventory reports could result in inaccurate reporting to various agencies. Questioned Costs ? None Reported. Context/Sampling ? A nonstatistical sample of 4 reports within CSFP out of a population of 12 were selected for testing. 1 out of the 4 tested had an error. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s) ? No. Recommendation ? It is recommended that the Organization implement processes and controls to ensure that all inventory reports are reviewed prior to submission and that review be properly documented. Views of Responsible Officials ? Management agrees with the finding.
2022-007 U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.565 All Awards Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.568 All Awards Food Distribution Cluster Activities Allowed/Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria ? A good system of internal controls includes a process to ensure that all costs are appropriately allocated to the programs. Condition ? As part of our audit, it was identified that there were multiple payroll allocation errors that were not identified by management. It was determined that some errors resulted in overallocation of costs while others in under allocation of costs. Cause ? No formal review was completed of the allocations before or after each payroll. This resulted in incorrect amounts being allocated to the programs. Effect ? The failure to adequately review payroll allocations resulted in incorrect charges to the program. Questioned Costs ? None Reported. Context/Sampling ? A nonstatistical sample of 8 pay periods out of a population of 26 pay periods were selected for testing. All 8 pay periods had an error. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s) ? No. Recommendation ? It is recommended that the Organization implement processes and controls to ensure that payroll allocations are reviewed and approved with each payroll processed. Views of Responsible Officials ? Management agrees with the finding.
2022-004 U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.565 All Awards Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.568 All Awards Food Distribution Cluster Activities Allowed/Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria ? A good system of internal controls includes a documented process to ensure that expenses with the potential to be charged to a federal program are allowable within the Uniform Guidance and grant requirements. Condition ? During review of invoices, it was identified that there were three expense transactions that were charged to accounts that were later allocated to federal programs that did not meet the requirements to be allowable within the grant requirements or under Uniform Guidance or were missing proper documentation of approval. Cause ? Due to oversight by management and lack of documented control processes, costs that are considered unallowable within the grant requirements were included in accounts determined to be allocated to the program for expenditure. Effect ? The Organization?s internal controls failed to ensure proper documentation of review and approval and identify costs that are not allowed within under the program. Questioned Costs ? None Reported. Context/Sampling ? A nonstatistical sample of 60 expenses out of a population of over 250 were selected for testing of allocated expenses. 3 out of the 60 transactions tested had an error. An additional nonstatistical sample of 8 expenses directly charged to CSFP out of a population of 26 were selected for testing. 1 out of the 8 transactions tested had an error. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s) ? Yes. Recommendation ? Management should implement internal controls to ensure all expenses are properly documented and approved to accounts that will be allocated at year-end are considered allowable. Views of Responsible Officials ? Management agrees with the finding.
2022-005 U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.565 All Awards Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.568 All Awards Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.569 All Awards Food Distribution Cluster Eligibility Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria ? A good system of internal controls includes a process to ensure that eligibility determinations for the program are appropriate. This includes a process to ensure proper completion of all tracking forms and documentation, including documented reviews. Condition ? During our review of the eligibility determinations, it was identified that there were two forms that were incomplete within the files, as they were missing signatures of participants or a documented review process. Cause ? Due to oversight by management, all forms were not completed and documented within participant files. Effect ? The Organization?s internal control process was not followed, resulting in lack of documentation of eligibility determination and no documented review process. However, it is noted that the individual participants and agencies were determined to be eligible for the program. Questioned Costs ? None Reported. Context/Sampling ? A nonstatistical sample of 60 participants within CSFP out of a population of over 250 were selected for eligibility testing. 1 out of the 60 eligibility determinations tested had an error. An additional nonstatistical sample of 29 participants within TEFAP out of a population of 146 were selected for eligibility testing. 1 out of the 29 eligibility determinations tested had an error. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s) ? No. Recommendation ? Management should implement internal controls to ensure all eligibility determination reviews are documented and retained in the file. Views of Responsible Officials ? Management agrees with the finding.
2022-006 U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.565 All Awards Food Distribution Cluster Special Tests and Provisions Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria ? A good system of internal controls includes a process to ensure that all inventory reports filed with various agencies are completed accurately and reviewed. Condition ? As part of our audit, it was identified that there was no formal documentation of the review process for inventory reports filed with various agencies. Cause ? Due to oversight of management involved with the process, no formal review has been documented or retained for the processes of the inventory reports being submitted to various agencies. Effect ? The failure to adequately review and document the review of the inventory reports could result in inaccurate reporting to various agencies. Questioned Costs ? None Reported. Context/Sampling ? A nonstatistical sample of 4 reports within CSFP out of a population of 12 were selected for testing. 1 out of the 4 tested had an error. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s) ? No. Recommendation ? It is recommended that the Organization implement processes and controls to ensure that all inventory reports are reviewed prior to submission and that review be properly documented. Views of Responsible Officials ? Management agrees with the finding.
2022-007 U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.565 All Awards Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.568 All Awards Food Distribution Cluster Activities Allowed/Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria ? A good system of internal controls includes a process to ensure that all costs are appropriately allocated to the programs. Condition ? As part of our audit, it was identified that there were multiple payroll allocation errors that were not identified by management. It was determined that some errors resulted in overallocation of costs while others in under allocation of costs. Cause ? No formal review was completed of the allocations before or after each payroll. This resulted in incorrect amounts being allocated to the programs. Effect ? The failure to adequately review payroll allocations resulted in incorrect charges to the program. Questioned Costs ? None Reported. Context/Sampling ? A nonstatistical sample of 8 pay periods out of a population of 26 pay periods were selected for testing. All 8 pay periods had an error. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s) ? No. Recommendation ? It is recommended that the Organization implement processes and controls to ensure that payroll allocations are reviewed and approved with each payroll processed. Views of Responsible Officials ? Management agrees with the finding.
2022-004 U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.565 All Awards Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.568 All Awards Food Distribution Cluster Activities Allowed/Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria ? A good system of internal controls includes a documented process to ensure that expenses with the potential to be charged to a federal program are allowable within the Uniform Guidance and grant requirements. Condition ? During review of invoices, it was identified that there were three expense transactions that were charged to accounts that were later allocated to federal programs that did not meet the requirements to be allowable within the grant requirements or under Uniform Guidance or were missing proper documentation of approval. Cause ? Due to oversight by management and lack of documented control processes, costs that are considered unallowable within the grant requirements were included in accounts determined to be allocated to the program for expenditure. Effect ? The Organization?s internal controls failed to ensure proper documentation of review and approval and identify costs that are not allowed within under the program. Questioned Costs ? None Reported. Context/Sampling ? A nonstatistical sample of 60 expenses out of a population of over 250 were selected for testing of allocated expenses. 3 out of the 60 transactions tested had an error. An additional nonstatistical sample of 8 expenses directly charged to CSFP out of a population of 26 were selected for testing. 1 out of the 8 transactions tested had an error. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s) ? Yes. Recommendation ? Management should implement internal controls to ensure all expenses are properly documented and approved to accounts that will be allocated at year-end are considered allowable. Views of Responsible Officials ? Management agrees with the finding.
2022-005 U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.565 All Awards Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.568 All Awards Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.569 All Awards Food Distribution Cluster Eligibility Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria ? A good system of internal controls includes a process to ensure that eligibility determinations for the program are appropriate. This includes a process to ensure proper completion of all tracking forms and documentation, including documented reviews. Condition ? During our review of the eligibility determinations, it was identified that there were two forms that were incomplete within the files, as they were missing signatures of participants or a documented review process. Cause ? Due to oversight by management, all forms were not completed and documented within participant files. Effect ? The Organization?s internal control process was not followed, resulting in lack of documentation of eligibility determination and no documented review process. However, it is noted that the individual participants and agencies were determined to be eligible for the program. Questioned Costs ? None Reported. Context/Sampling ? A nonstatistical sample of 60 participants within CSFP out of a population of over 250 were selected for eligibility testing. 1 out of the 60 eligibility determinations tested had an error. An additional nonstatistical sample of 29 participants within TEFAP out of a population of 146 were selected for eligibility testing. 1 out of the 29 eligibility determinations tested had an error. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s) ? No. Recommendation ? Management should implement internal controls to ensure all eligibility determination reviews are documented and retained in the file. Views of Responsible Officials ? Management agrees with the finding.
2022-007 U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.565 All Awards Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.568 All Awards Food Distribution Cluster Activities Allowed/Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria ? A good system of internal controls includes a process to ensure that all costs are appropriately allocated to the programs. Condition ? As part of our audit, it was identified that there were multiple payroll allocation errors that were not identified by management. It was determined that some errors resulted in overallocation of costs while others in under allocation of costs. Cause ? No formal review was completed of the allocations before or after each payroll. This resulted in incorrect amounts being allocated to the programs. Effect ? The failure to adequately review payroll allocations resulted in incorrect charges to the program. Questioned Costs ? None Reported. Context/Sampling ? A nonstatistical sample of 8 pay periods out of a population of 26 pay periods were selected for testing. All 8 pay periods had an error. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s) ? No. Recommendation ? It is recommended that the Organization implement processes and controls to ensure that payroll allocations are reviewed and approved with each payroll processed. Views of Responsible Officials ? Management agrees with the finding.
2022-004 U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.565 All Awards Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.568 All Awards Food Distribution Cluster Activities Allowed/Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria ? A good system of internal controls includes a documented process to ensure that expenses with the potential to be charged to a federal program are allowable within the Uniform Guidance and grant requirements. Condition ? During review of invoices, it was identified that there were three expense transactions that were charged to accounts that were later allocated to federal programs that did not meet the requirements to be allowable within the grant requirements or under Uniform Guidance or were missing proper documentation of approval. Cause ? Due to oversight by management and lack of documented control processes, costs that are considered unallowable within the grant requirements were included in accounts determined to be allocated to the program for expenditure. Effect ? The Organization?s internal controls failed to ensure proper documentation of review and approval and identify costs that are not allowed within under the program. Questioned Costs ? None Reported. Context/Sampling ? A nonstatistical sample of 60 expenses out of a population of over 250 were selected for testing of allocated expenses. 3 out of the 60 transactions tested had an error. An additional nonstatistical sample of 8 expenses directly charged to CSFP out of a population of 26 were selected for testing. 1 out of the 8 transactions tested had an error. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s) ? Yes. Recommendation ? Management should implement internal controls to ensure all expenses are properly documented and approved to accounts that will be allocated at year-end are considered allowable. Views of Responsible Officials ? Management agrees with the finding.
2022-005 U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.565 All Awards Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.568 All Awards Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.569 All Awards Food Distribution Cluster Eligibility Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria ? A good system of internal controls includes a process to ensure that eligibility determinations for the program are appropriate. This includes a process to ensure proper completion of all tracking forms and documentation, including documented reviews. Condition ? During our review of the eligibility determinations, it was identified that there were two forms that were incomplete within the files, as they were missing signatures of participants or a documented review process. Cause ? Due to oversight by management, all forms were not completed and documented within participant files. Effect ? The Organization?s internal control process was not followed, resulting in lack of documentation of eligibility determination and no documented review process. However, it is noted that the individual participants and agencies were determined to be eligible for the program. Questioned Costs ? None Reported. Context/Sampling ? A nonstatistical sample of 60 participants within CSFP out of a population of over 250 were selected for eligibility testing. 1 out of the 60 eligibility determinations tested had an error. An additional nonstatistical sample of 29 participants within TEFAP out of a population of 146 were selected for eligibility testing. 1 out of the 29 eligibility determinations tested had an error. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s) ? No. Recommendation ? Management should implement internal controls to ensure all eligibility determination reviews are documented and retained in the file. Views of Responsible Officials ? Management agrees with the finding.
2022-007 U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.565 All Awards Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.568 All Awards Food Distribution Cluster Activities Allowed/Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria ? A good system of internal controls includes a process to ensure that all costs are appropriately allocated to the programs. Condition ? As part of our audit, it was identified that there were multiple payroll allocation errors that were not identified by management. It was determined that some errors resulted in overallocation of costs while others in under allocation of costs. Cause ? No formal review was completed of the allocations before or after each payroll. This resulted in incorrect amounts being allocated to the programs. Effect ? The failure to adequately review payroll allocations resulted in incorrect charges to the program. Questioned Costs ? None Reported. Context/Sampling ? A nonstatistical sample of 8 pay periods out of a population of 26 pay periods were selected for testing. All 8 pay periods had an error. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s) ? No. Recommendation ? It is recommended that the Organization implement processes and controls to ensure that payroll allocations are reviewed and approved with each payroll processed. Views of Responsible Officials ? Management agrees with the finding.
2022-005 U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.565 All Awards Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.568 All Awards Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.569 All Awards Food Distribution Cluster Eligibility Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria ? A good system of internal controls includes a process to ensure that eligibility determinations for the program are appropriate. This includes a process to ensure proper completion of all tracking forms and documentation, including documented reviews. Condition ? During our review of the eligibility determinations, it was identified that there were two forms that were incomplete within the files, as they were missing signatures of participants or a documented review process. Cause ? Due to oversight by management, all forms were not completed and documented within participant files. Effect ? The Organization?s internal control process was not followed, resulting in lack of documentation of eligibility determination and no documented review process. However, it is noted that the individual participants and agencies were determined to be eligible for the program. Questioned Costs ? None Reported. Context/Sampling ? A nonstatistical sample of 60 participants within CSFP out of a population of over 250 were selected for eligibility testing. 1 out of the 60 eligibility determinations tested had an error. An additional nonstatistical sample of 29 participants within TEFAP out of a population of 146 were selected for eligibility testing. 1 out of the 29 eligibility determinations tested had an error. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s) ? No. Recommendation ? Management should implement internal controls to ensure all eligibility determination reviews are documented and retained in the file. Views of Responsible Officials ? Management agrees with the finding.
2022-005 U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.565 All Awards Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.568 All Awards Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.569 All Awards Food Distribution Cluster Eligibility Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria ? A good system of internal controls includes a process to ensure that eligibility determinations for the program are appropriate. This includes a process to ensure proper completion of all tracking forms and documentation, including documented reviews. Condition ? During our review of the eligibility determinations, it was identified that there were two forms that were incomplete within the files, as they were missing signatures of participants or a documented review process. Cause ? Due to oversight by management, all forms were not completed and documented within participant files. Effect ? The Organization?s internal control process was not followed, resulting in lack of documentation of eligibility determination and no documented review process. However, it is noted that the individual participants and agencies were determined to be eligible for the program. Questioned Costs ? None Reported. Context/Sampling ? A nonstatistical sample of 60 participants within CSFP out of a population of over 250 were selected for eligibility testing. 1 out of the 60 eligibility determinations tested had an error. An additional nonstatistical sample of 29 participants within TEFAP out of a population of 146 were selected for eligibility testing. 1 out of the 29 eligibility determinations tested had an error. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s) ? No. Recommendation ? Management should implement internal controls to ensure all eligibility determination reviews are documented and retained in the file. Views of Responsible Officials ? Management agrees with the finding.
2022-004 U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.565 All Awards Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.568 All Awards Food Distribution Cluster Activities Allowed/Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria ? A good system of internal controls includes a documented process to ensure that expenses with the potential to be charged to a federal program are allowable within the Uniform Guidance and grant requirements. Condition ? During review of invoices, it was identified that there were three expense transactions that were charged to accounts that were later allocated to federal programs that did not meet the requirements to be allowable within the grant requirements or under Uniform Guidance or were missing proper documentation of approval. Cause ? Due to oversight by management and lack of documented control processes, costs that are considered unallowable within the grant requirements were included in accounts determined to be allocated to the program for expenditure. Effect ? The Organization?s internal controls failed to ensure proper documentation of review and approval and identify costs that are not allowed within under the program. Questioned Costs ? None Reported. Context/Sampling ? A nonstatistical sample of 60 expenses out of a population of over 250 were selected for testing of allocated expenses. 3 out of the 60 transactions tested had an error. An additional nonstatistical sample of 8 expenses directly charged to CSFP out of a population of 26 were selected for testing. 1 out of the 8 transactions tested had an error. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s) ? Yes. Recommendation ? Management should implement internal controls to ensure all expenses are properly documented and approved to accounts that will be allocated at year-end are considered allowable. Views of Responsible Officials ? Management agrees with the finding.
2022-005 U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.565 All Awards Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.568 All Awards Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.569 All Awards Food Distribution Cluster Eligibility Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria ? A good system of internal controls includes a process to ensure that eligibility determinations for the program are appropriate. This includes a process to ensure proper completion of all tracking forms and documentation, including documented reviews. Condition ? During our review of the eligibility determinations, it was identified that there were two forms that were incomplete within the files, as they were missing signatures of participants or a documented review process. Cause ? Due to oversight by management, all forms were not completed and documented within participant files. Effect ? The Organization?s internal control process was not followed, resulting in lack of documentation of eligibility determination and no documented review process. However, it is noted that the individual participants and agencies were determined to be eligible for the program. Questioned Costs ? None Reported. Context/Sampling ? A nonstatistical sample of 60 participants within CSFP out of a population of over 250 were selected for eligibility testing. 1 out of the 60 eligibility determinations tested had an error. An additional nonstatistical sample of 29 participants within TEFAP out of a population of 146 were selected for eligibility testing. 1 out of the 29 eligibility determinations tested had an error. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s) ? No. Recommendation ? Management should implement internal controls to ensure all eligibility determination reviews are documented and retained in the file. Views of Responsible Officials ? Management agrees with the finding.
2022-006 U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.565 All Awards Food Distribution Cluster Special Tests and Provisions Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria ? A good system of internal controls includes a process to ensure that all inventory reports filed with various agencies are completed accurately and reviewed. Condition ? As part of our audit, it was identified that there was no formal documentation of the review process for inventory reports filed with various agencies. Cause ? Due to oversight of management involved with the process, no formal review has been documented or retained for the processes of the inventory reports being submitted to various agencies. Effect ? The failure to adequately review and document the review of the inventory reports could result in inaccurate reporting to various agencies. Questioned Costs ? None Reported. Context/Sampling ? A nonstatistical sample of 4 reports within CSFP out of a population of 12 were selected for testing. 1 out of the 4 tested had an error. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s) ? No. Recommendation ? It is recommended that the Organization implement processes and controls to ensure that all inventory reports are reviewed prior to submission and that review be properly documented. Views of Responsible Officials ? Management agrees with the finding.
2022-007 U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.565 All Awards Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.568 All Awards Food Distribution Cluster Activities Allowed/Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria ? A good system of internal controls includes a process to ensure that all costs are appropriately allocated to the programs. Condition ? As part of our audit, it was identified that there were multiple payroll allocation errors that were not identified by management. It was determined that some errors resulted in overallocation of costs while others in under allocation of costs. Cause ? No formal review was completed of the allocations before or after each payroll. This resulted in incorrect amounts being allocated to the programs. Effect ? The failure to adequately review payroll allocations resulted in incorrect charges to the program. Questioned Costs ? None Reported. Context/Sampling ? A nonstatistical sample of 8 pay periods out of a population of 26 pay periods were selected for testing. All 8 pay periods had an error. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s) ? No. Recommendation ? It is recommended that the Organization implement processes and controls to ensure that payroll allocations are reviewed and approved with each payroll processed. Views of Responsible Officials ? Management agrees with the finding.
2022-004 U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.565 All Awards Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.568 All Awards Food Distribution Cluster Activities Allowed/Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria ? A good system of internal controls includes a documented process to ensure that expenses with the potential to be charged to a federal program are allowable within the Uniform Guidance and grant requirements. Condition ? During review of invoices, it was identified that there were three expense transactions that were charged to accounts that were later allocated to federal programs that did not meet the requirements to be allowable within the grant requirements or under Uniform Guidance or were missing proper documentation of approval. Cause ? Due to oversight by management and lack of documented control processes, costs that are considered unallowable within the grant requirements were included in accounts determined to be allocated to the program for expenditure. Effect ? The Organization?s internal controls failed to ensure proper documentation of review and approval and identify costs that are not allowed within under the program. Questioned Costs ? None Reported. Context/Sampling ? A nonstatistical sample of 60 expenses out of a population of over 250 were selected for testing of allocated expenses. 3 out of the 60 transactions tested had an error. An additional nonstatistical sample of 8 expenses directly charged to CSFP out of a population of 26 were selected for testing. 1 out of the 8 transactions tested had an error. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s) ? Yes. Recommendation ? Management should implement internal controls to ensure all expenses are properly documented and approved to accounts that will be allocated at year-end are considered allowable. Views of Responsible Officials ? Management agrees with the finding.
2022-005 U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.565 All Awards Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.568 All Awards Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.569 All Awards Food Distribution Cluster Eligibility Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria ? A good system of internal controls includes a process to ensure that eligibility determinations for the program are appropriate. This includes a process to ensure proper completion of all tracking forms and documentation, including documented reviews. Condition ? During our review of the eligibility determinations, it was identified that there were two forms that were incomplete within the files, as they were missing signatures of participants or a documented review process. Cause ? Due to oversight by management, all forms were not completed and documented within participant files. Effect ? The Organization?s internal control process was not followed, resulting in lack of documentation of eligibility determination and no documented review process. However, it is noted that the individual participants and agencies were determined to be eligible for the program. Questioned Costs ? None Reported. Context/Sampling ? A nonstatistical sample of 60 participants within CSFP out of a population of over 250 were selected for eligibility testing. 1 out of the 60 eligibility determinations tested had an error. An additional nonstatistical sample of 29 participants within TEFAP out of a population of 146 were selected for eligibility testing. 1 out of the 29 eligibility determinations tested had an error. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s) ? No. Recommendation ? Management should implement internal controls to ensure all eligibility determination reviews are documented and retained in the file. Views of Responsible Officials ? Management agrees with the finding.
2022-006 U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.565 All Awards Food Distribution Cluster Special Tests and Provisions Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria ? A good system of internal controls includes a process to ensure that all inventory reports filed with various agencies are completed accurately and reviewed. Condition ? As part of our audit, it was identified that there was no formal documentation of the review process for inventory reports filed with various agencies. Cause ? Due to oversight of management involved with the process, no formal review has been documented or retained for the processes of the inventory reports being submitted to various agencies. Effect ? The failure to adequately review and document the review of the inventory reports could result in inaccurate reporting to various agencies. Questioned Costs ? None Reported. Context/Sampling ? A nonstatistical sample of 4 reports within CSFP out of a population of 12 were selected for testing. 1 out of the 4 tested had an error. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s) ? No. Recommendation ? It is recommended that the Organization implement processes and controls to ensure that all inventory reports are reviewed prior to submission and that review be properly documented. Views of Responsible Officials ? Management agrees with the finding.
2022-007 U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.565 All Awards Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.568 All Awards Food Distribution Cluster Activities Allowed/Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria ? A good system of internal controls includes a process to ensure that all costs are appropriately allocated to the programs. Condition ? As part of our audit, it was identified that there were multiple payroll allocation errors that were not identified by management. It was determined that some errors resulted in overallocation of costs while others in under allocation of costs. Cause ? No formal review was completed of the allocations before or after each payroll. This resulted in incorrect amounts being allocated to the programs. Effect ? The failure to adequately review payroll allocations resulted in incorrect charges to the program. Questioned Costs ? None Reported. Context/Sampling ? A nonstatistical sample of 8 pay periods out of a population of 26 pay periods were selected for testing. All 8 pay periods had an error. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s) ? No. Recommendation ? It is recommended that the Organization implement processes and controls to ensure that payroll allocations are reviewed and approved with each payroll processed. Views of Responsible Officials ? Management agrees with the finding.
2022-004 U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.565 All Awards Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.568 All Awards Food Distribution Cluster Activities Allowed/Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria ? A good system of internal controls includes a documented process to ensure that expenses with the potential to be charged to a federal program are allowable within the Uniform Guidance and grant requirements. Condition ? During review of invoices, it was identified that there were three expense transactions that were charged to accounts that were later allocated to federal programs that did not meet the requirements to be allowable within the grant requirements or under Uniform Guidance or were missing proper documentation of approval. Cause ? Due to oversight by management and lack of documented control processes, costs that are considered unallowable within the grant requirements were included in accounts determined to be allocated to the program for expenditure. Effect ? The Organization?s internal controls failed to ensure proper documentation of review and approval and identify costs that are not allowed within under the program. Questioned Costs ? None Reported. Context/Sampling ? A nonstatistical sample of 60 expenses out of a population of over 250 were selected for testing of allocated expenses. 3 out of the 60 transactions tested had an error. An additional nonstatistical sample of 8 expenses directly charged to CSFP out of a population of 26 were selected for testing. 1 out of the 8 transactions tested had an error. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s) ? Yes. Recommendation ? Management should implement internal controls to ensure all expenses are properly documented and approved to accounts that will be allocated at year-end are considered allowable. Views of Responsible Officials ? Management agrees with the finding.
2022-005 U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.565 All Awards Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.568 All Awards Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.569 All Awards Food Distribution Cluster Eligibility Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria ? A good system of internal controls includes a process to ensure that eligibility determinations for the program are appropriate. This includes a process to ensure proper completion of all tracking forms and documentation, including documented reviews. Condition ? During our review of the eligibility determinations, it was identified that there were two forms that were incomplete within the files, as they were missing signatures of participants or a documented review process. Cause ? Due to oversight by management, all forms were not completed and documented within participant files. Effect ? The Organization?s internal control process was not followed, resulting in lack of documentation of eligibility determination and no documented review process. However, it is noted that the individual participants and agencies were determined to be eligible for the program. Questioned Costs ? None Reported. Context/Sampling ? A nonstatistical sample of 60 participants within CSFP out of a population of over 250 were selected for eligibility testing. 1 out of the 60 eligibility determinations tested had an error. An additional nonstatistical sample of 29 participants within TEFAP out of a population of 146 were selected for eligibility testing. 1 out of the 29 eligibility determinations tested had an error. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s) ? No. Recommendation ? Management should implement internal controls to ensure all eligibility determination reviews are documented and retained in the file. Views of Responsible Officials ? Management agrees with the finding.
2022-007 U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.565 All Awards Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.568 All Awards Food Distribution Cluster Activities Allowed/Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria ? A good system of internal controls includes a process to ensure that all costs are appropriately allocated to the programs. Condition ? As part of our audit, it was identified that there were multiple payroll allocation errors that were not identified by management. It was determined that some errors resulted in overallocation of costs while others in under allocation of costs. Cause ? No formal review was completed of the allocations before or after each payroll. This resulted in incorrect amounts being allocated to the programs. Effect ? The failure to adequately review payroll allocations resulted in incorrect charges to the program. Questioned Costs ? None Reported. Context/Sampling ? A nonstatistical sample of 8 pay periods out of a population of 26 pay periods were selected for testing. All 8 pay periods had an error. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s) ? No. Recommendation ? It is recommended that the Organization implement processes and controls to ensure that payroll allocations are reviewed and approved with each payroll processed. Views of Responsible Officials ? Management agrees with the finding.
2022-004 U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.565 All Awards Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.568 All Awards Food Distribution Cluster Activities Allowed/Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria ? A good system of internal controls includes a documented process to ensure that expenses with the potential to be charged to a federal program are allowable within the Uniform Guidance and grant requirements. Condition ? During review of invoices, it was identified that there were three expense transactions that were charged to accounts that were later allocated to federal programs that did not meet the requirements to be allowable within the grant requirements or under Uniform Guidance or were missing proper documentation of approval. Cause ? Due to oversight by management and lack of documented control processes, costs that are considered unallowable within the grant requirements were included in accounts determined to be allocated to the program for expenditure. Effect ? The Organization?s internal controls failed to ensure proper documentation of review and approval and identify costs that are not allowed within under the program. Questioned Costs ? None Reported. Context/Sampling ? A nonstatistical sample of 60 expenses out of a population of over 250 were selected for testing of allocated expenses. 3 out of the 60 transactions tested had an error. An additional nonstatistical sample of 8 expenses directly charged to CSFP out of a population of 26 were selected for testing. 1 out of the 8 transactions tested had an error. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s) ? Yes. Recommendation ? Management should implement internal controls to ensure all expenses are properly documented and approved to accounts that will be allocated at year-end are considered allowable. Views of Responsible Officials ? Management agrees with the finding.
2022-005 U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.565 All Awards Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.568 All Awards Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.569 All Awards Food Distribution Cluster Eligibility Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria ? A good system of internal controls includes a process to ensure that eligibility determinations for the program are appropriate. This includes a process to ensure proper completion of all tracking forms and documentation, including documented reviews. Condition ? During our review of the eligibility determinations, it was identified that there were two forms that were incomplete within the files, as they were missing signatures of participants or a documented review process. Cause ? Due to oversight by management, all forms were not completed and documented within participant files. Effect ? The Organization?s internal control process was not followed, resulting in lack of documentation of eligibility determination and no documented review process. However, it is noted that the individual participants and agencies were determined to be eligible for the program. Questioned Costs ? None Reported. Context/Sampling ? A nonstatistical sample of 60 participants within CSFP out of a population of over 250 were selected for eligibility testing. 1 out of the 60 eligibility determinations tested had an error. An additional nonstatistical sample of 29 participants within TEFAP out of a population of 146 were selected for eligibility testing. 1 out of the 29 eligibility determinations tested had an error. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s) ? No. Recommendation ? Management should implement internal controls to ensure all eligibility determination reviews are documented and retained in the file. Views of Responsible Officials ? Management agrees with the finding.
2022-007 U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.565 All Awards Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.568 All Awards Food Distribution Cluster Activities Allowed/Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria ? A good system of internal controls includes a process to ensure that all costs are appropriately allocated to the programs. Condition ? As part of our audit, it was identified that there were multiple payroll allocation errors that were not identified by management. It was determined that some errors resulted in overallocation of costs while others in under allocation of costs. Cause ? No formal review was completed of the allocations before or after each payroll. This resulted in incorrect amounts being allocated to the programs. Effect ? The failure to adequately review payroll allocations resulted in incorrect charges to the program. Questioned Costs ? None Reported. Context/Sampling ? A nonstatistical sample of 8 pay periods out of a population of 26 pay periods were selected for testing. All 8 pay periods had an error. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s) ? No. Recommendation ? It is recommended that the Organization implement processes and controls to ensure that payroll allocations are reviewed and approved with each payroll processed. Views of Responsible Officials ? Management agrees with the finding.
2022-005 U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.565 All Awards Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.568 All Awards Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.569 All Awards Food Distribution Cluster Eligibility Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria ? A good system of internal controls includes a process to ensure that eligibility determinations for the program are appropriate. This includes a process to ensure proper completion of all tracking forms and documentation, including documented reviews. Condition ? During our review of the eligibility determinations, it was identified that there were two forms that were incomplete within the files, as they were missing signatures of participants or a documented review process. Cause ? Due to oversight by management, all forms were not completed and documented within participant files. Effect ? The Organization?s internal control process was not followed, resulting in lack of documentation of eligibility determination and no documented review process. However, it is noted that the individual participants and agencies were determined to be eligible for the program. Questioned Costs ? None Reported. Context/Sampling ? A nonstatistical sample of 60 participants within CSFP out of a population of over 250 were selected for eligibility testing. 1 out of the 60 eligibility determinations tested had an error. An additional nonstatistical sample of 29 participants within TEFAP out of a population of 146 were selected for eligibility testing. 1 out of the 29 eligibility determinations tested had an error. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s) ? No. Recommendation ? Management should implement internal controls to ensure all eligibility determination reviews are documented and retained in the file. Views of Responsible Officials ? Management agrees with the finding.
2022-005 U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.565 All Awards Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.568 All Awards Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.569 All Awards Food Distribution Cluster Eligibility Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria ? A good system of internal controls includes a process to ensure that eligibility determinations for the program are appropriate. This includes a process to ensure proper completion of all tracking forms and documentation, including documented reviews. Condition ? During our review of the eligibility determinations, it was identified that there were two forms that were incomplete within the files, as they were missing signatures of participants or a documented review process. Cause ? Due to oversight by management, all forms were not completed and documented within participant files. Effect ? The Organization?s internal control process was not followed, resulting in lack of documentation of eligibility determination and no documented review process. However, it is noted that the individual participants and agencies were determined to be eligible for the program. Questioned Costs ? None Reported. Context/Sampling ? A nonstatistical sample of 60 participants within CSFP out of a population of over 250 were selected for eligibility testing. 1 out of the 60 eligibility determinations tested had an error. An additional nonstatistical sample of 29 participants within TEFAP out of a population of 146 were selected for eligibility testing. 1 out of the 29 eligibility determinations tested had an error. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s) ? No. Recommendation ? Management should implement internal controls to ensure all eligibility determination reviews are documented and retained in the file. Views of Responsible Officials ? Management agrees with the finding.