Audit 55626

FY End
2022-06-30
Total Expended
$1.08M
Findings
0
Programs
20
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-08-13

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

No findings recorded

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
10.555 National School Lunch Program $350,069 Yes 0
84.425 Esser II $263,749 - 0
84.010 Essa School Improvement Funding $101,282 Yes 0
84.027 Idea Basic Local Assistance $84,005 - 0
84.010 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies $74,093 Yes 0
10.558 Child and Adult Care Food Program $49,818 - 0
84.184 School Climate Transformation $47,000 - 0
84.358 Rural & Low Income Schools $27,096 - 0
10.555 National School Lunch Program- Noncash Commodities $26,769 Yes 0
84.365 Tittle III English Learner Student Program $16,513 - 0
84.424 Title IV Student Support & Academic Enrichment $10,000 - 0
84.367 Title II Supporting Effective Instruction $8,479 - 0
10.555 Snp Covid-19 Emergency Cost Reinbursement $6,014 Yes 0
10.558 Cacfp Covid-19 Emergency Cost Reimbursement $5,058 - 0
84.027 Idea Mental Health $4,123 - 0
84.027 Idea Local Assistance, Private Schools $1,356 - 0
84.173 Idea Preschool Grants $1,077 - 0
10.555 Pandemic Electronic Benefit Transfer $614 Yes 0
10.579 Child Nutrion Equipment Assitance $366 - 0
84.425 Esser $8 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
MHTGGMYWFC43 Jessica Gillespie Auditee
7607675357 Aubrey Mann Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: The expenditures reported on the schedule are recognized following the cost principles contained in the UniformGuidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negativeamounts shown on the Schedule, if any, represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business toamounts reported as expenditures in prior years. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Indirect costs were calculated in accordance with 2 CFR ?200.412 Direct and Indirect Costs. The District wasauthorized by the California Department of Education to utilize an indirect cost rate of 8.14%; however, due tobudgetary constraints the District did not charge indirect costs to any program. The District did not elect to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in 2 CFR ?200.414 Indirect Costs.