Audit 55197

FY End
2022-06-30
Total Expended
$873,794
Findings
2
Programs
8
Organization: Friendship Academy of the Arts (MN)
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-09-17

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
57951 2022-006 Material Weakness - N
634393 2022-006 Material Weakness - N

Contacts

Name Title Type
NAP6FSJDU4B4 Carr Kpanyor Auditee
6128796703 Christopher Knopik Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Schedule of Expenditures Accounting Policies: The expenditures on this schedule are on the modified accrual basis of accounting, which is described in Note 1 to thefinancial statements of the School. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Title 2 U.S.Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements forFederal Awards, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. The Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards presents the activity of federal award programs expended by Friendship Academy of the Arts Charter School No. 4079.

Finding Details

2022-006 Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Name: COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425U Federal Award Identification Number and Year: S425V210045 Awarded fiscal year 2022 Pass-Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Education Pass-Through Number(s): S425D210045 Award Period: 7/1/2021 ? 6/30/2022 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Compliance Finding Criteria or specific requirement: The School should have an internal control over each major compliance area, including allowability, to ensure all payments are allowable for the grant to which they are coded. Condition: It was noted that manual checks, wire transactions, and debit card purchases did not have documentation of the transactions being reviewed and approved. It was noted during payroll testing that none of the disbursements tested had documentation of someone reviewing the payment for allowability or amount. There were also payments to individuals for incorrect amounts that were charged to the grant. Questioned costs: None Context: Of the eight items tested five of them did not have documentation of review and approval. Of the 13 payroll items tested, none of them had documentation of review and approval. Of the 13 payroll items tested 5 of them had discrepancies between the amount paid to the individual and their approved contract. In some instances there was an overpayment and in others an under-payment which caused some additional costs to be coded to the federal expenditures for this program. Cause: These types of payments were not reviewed and approved at a detailed level during the year, or if they were, that review was not formally documented. Effect: The School does not have any documentation of someone reviewing and approving the expenditures charged to the federal program, and in some situations paid out incorrect amounts to individuals coded to the program. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that all purchases are reviewed and approved, with part of that procedure being to review that the expenditures are allowable for the grant to which they are being recorded. This review and approval should be documented so it is clear who reviewed it and when. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2022-006 Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Name: COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425U Federal Award Identification Number and Year: S425V210045 Awarded fiscal year 2022 Pass-Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Education Pass-Through Number(s): S425D210045 Award Period: 7/1/2021 ? 6/30/2022 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Compliance Finding Criteria or specific requirement: The School should have an internal control over each major compliance area, including allowability, to ensure all payments are allowable for the grant to which they are coded. Condition: It was noted that manual checks, wire transactions, and debit card purchases did not have documentation of the transactions being reviewed and approved. It was noted during payroll testing that none of the disbursements tested had documentation of someone reviewing the payment for allowability or amount. There were also payments to individuals for incorrect amounts that were charged to the grant. Questioned costs: None Context: Of the eight items tested five of them did not have documentation of review and approval. Of the 13 payroll items tested, none of them had documentation of review and approval. Of the 13 payroll items tested 5 of them had discrepancies between the amount paid to the individual and their approved contract. In some instances there was an overpayment and in others an under-payment which caused some additional costs to be coded to the federal expenditures for this program. Cause: These types of payments were not reviewed and approved at a detailed level during the year, or if they were, that review was not formally documented. Effect: The School does not have any documentation of someone reviewing and approving the expenditures charged to the federal program, and in some situations paid out incorrect amounts to individuals coded to the program. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that all purchases are reviewed and approved, with part of that procedure being to review that the expenditures are allowable for the grant to which they are being recorded. This review and approval should be documented so it is clear who reviewed it and when. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.