Audit 55094

FY End
2022-06-30
Total Expended
$4.49M
Findings
8
Programs
17
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2022-11-08

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
59147 2022-002 Significant Deficiency Yes I
59148 2022-002 Significant Deficiency Yes I
59149 2022-002 Significant Deficiency Yes I
59150 2022-002 Significant Deficiency Yes I
635589 2022-002 Significant Deficiency Yes I
635590 2022-002 Significant Deficiency Yes I
635591 2022-002 Significant Deficiency Yes I
635592 2022-002 Significant Deficiency Yes I

Contacts

Name Title Type
YDCCVHE1SCF9 Brian Fried Auditee
9146319401 Robert Daniele Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Pass-through entity identifying numbers are presented where available. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The School District has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards ("Schedule") includes the federal award activity of the Union Free School District of the Tarrytowns, New Yorks (School District) under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2022. Federal awards received directly from Federal agencies as well as Federal awards passed through other government agencies are included in the Schedule. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the School District, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position or changes in net position of the School District.

Finding Details

2022-002: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Special Education Cluster (IDEA); Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.027, Special Education ? Grants to States; Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.173, Special Education ? Preschool Grants Criteria: 48 CFR Section 52.244-5(a) states, ?The Contractor shall select subcontractors (including suppliers) on a competitive basis to the maximum practical extent consistent with the objectives and requirements of the contract.? Further, 2 CFR Section 200.318(i) states, ?The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.? Condition: Both of the samples we selected for testing did not follow competitive bidding procedures or maintain documents as to the rationale for the method of procurement and contractor selection or rejection. Cause: The School District only renewed the contracts and did not provide for an opportunity for competitive bidding procedures. Effect or Potential Effect: The School District could be paying more than a reasonable amount for the services provided. Recommendation: The School District should follow state and federal procurement guidelines and select contractors on a competitive basis. The School District went through proper bidding procedures for 2022-23 fiscal year for procurement of services. Management?s Response: See corrective action plan.
2022-002: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Special Education Cluster (IDEA); Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.027, Special Education ? Grants to States; Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.173, Special Education ? Preschool Grants Criteria: 48 CFR Section 52.244-5(a) states, ?The Contractor shall select subcontractors (including suppliers) on a competitive basis to the maximum practical extent consistent with the objectives and requirements of the contract.? Further, 2 CFR Section 200.318(i) states, ?The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.? Condition: Both of the samples we selected for testing did not follow competitive bidding procedures or maintain documents as to the rationale for the method of procurement and contractor selection or rejection. Cause: The School District only renewed the contracts and did not provide for an opportunity for competitive bidding procedures. Effect or Potential Effect: The School District could be paying more than a reasonable amount for the services provided. Recommendation: The School District should follow state and federal procurement guidelines and select contractors on a competitive basis. The School District went through proper bidding procedures for 2022-23 fiscal year for procurement of services. Management?s Response: See corrective action plan.
2022-002: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Special Education Cluster (IDEA); Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.027, Special Education ? Grants to States; Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.173, Special Education ? Preschool Grants Criteria: 48 CFR Section 52.244-5(a) states, ?The Contractor shall select subcontractors (including suppliers) on a competitive basis to the maximum practical extent consistent with the objectives and requirements of the contract.? Further, 2 CFR Section 200.318(i) states, ?The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.? Condition: Both of the samples we selected for testing did not follow competitive bidding procedures or maintain documents as to the rationale for the method of procurement and contractor selection or rejection. Cause: The School District only renewed the contracts and did not provide for an opportunity for competitive bidding procedures. Effect or Potential Effect: The School District could be paying more than a reasonable amount for the services provided. Recommendation: The School District should follow state and federal procurement guidelines and select contractors on a competitive basis. The School District went through proper bidding procedures for 2022-23 fiscal year for procurement of services. Management?s Response: See corrective action plan.
2022-002: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Special Education Cluster (IDEA); Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.027, Special Education ? Grants to States; Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.173, Special Education ? Preschool Grants Criteria: 48 CFR Section 52.244-5(a) states, ?The Contractor shall select subcontractors (including suppliers) on a competitive basis to the maximum practical extent consistent with the objectives and requirements of the contract.? Further, 2 CFR Section 200.318(i) states, ?The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.? Condition: Both of the samples we selected for testing did not follow competitive bidding procedures or maintain documents as to the rationale for the method of procurement and contractor selection or rejection. Cause: The School District only renewed the contracts and did not provide for an opportunity for competitive bidding procedures. Effect or Potential Effect: The School District could be paying more than a reasonable amount for the services provided. Recommendation: The School District should follow state and federal procurement guidelines and select contractors on a competitive basis. The School District went through proper bidding procedures for 2022-23 fiscal year for procurement of services. Management?s Response: See corrective action plan.
2022-002: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Special Education Cluster (IDEA); Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.027, Special Education ? Grants to States; Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.173, Special Education ? Preschool Grants Criteria: 48 CFR Section 52.244-5(a) states, ?The Contractor shall select subcontractors (including suppliers) on a competitive basis to the maximum practical extent consistent with the objectives and requirements of the contract.? Further, 2 CFR Section 200.318(i) states, ?The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.? Condition: Both of the samples we selected for testing did not follow competitive bidding procedures or maintain documents as to the rationale for the method of procurement and contractor selection or rejection. Cause: The School District only renewed the contracts and did not provide for an opportunity for competitive bidding procedures. Effect or Potential Effect: The School District could be paying more than a reasonable amount for the services provided. Recommendation: The School District should follow state and federal procurement guidelines and select contractors on a competitive basis. The School District went through proper bidding procedures for 2022-23 fiscal year for procurement of services. Management?s Response: See corrective action plan.
2022-002: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Special Education Cluster (IDEA); Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.027, Special Education ? Grants to States; Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.173, Special Education ? Preschool Grants Criteria: 48 CFR Section 52.244-5(a) states, ?The Contractor shall select subcontractors (including suppliers) on a competitive basis to the maximum practical extent consistent with the objectives and requirements of the contract.? Further, 2 CFR Section 200.318(i) states, ?The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.? Condition: Both of the samples we selected for testing did not follow competitive bidding procedures or maintain documents as to the rationale for the method of procurement and contractor selection or rejection. Cause: The School District only renewed the contracts and did not provide for an opportunity for competitive bidding procedures. Effect or Potential Effect: The School District could be paying more than a reasonable amount for the services provided. Recommendation: The School District should follow state and federal procurement guidelines and select contractors on a competitive basis. The School District went through proper bidding procedures for 2022-23 fiscal year for procurement of services. Management?s Response: See corrective action plan.
2022-002: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Special Education Cluster (IDEA); Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.027, Special Education ? Grants to States; Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.173, Special Education ? Preschool Grants Criteria: 48 CFR Section 52.244-5(a) states, ?The Contractor shall select subcontractors (including suppliers) on a competitive basis to the maximum practical extent consistent with the objectives and requirements of the contract.? Further, 2 CFR Section 200.318(i) states, ?The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.? Condition: Both of the samples we selected for testing did not follow competitive bidding procedures or maintain documents as to the rationale for the method of procurement and contractor selection or rejection. Cause: The School District only renewed the contracts and did not provide for an opportunity for competitive bidding procedures. Effect or Potential Effect: The School District could be paying more than a reasonable amount for the services provided. Recommendation: The School District should follow state and federal procurement guidelines and select contractors on a competitive basis. The School District went through proper bidding procedures for 2022-23 fiscal year for procurement of services. Management?s Response: See corrective action plan.
2022-002: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Special Education Cluster (IDEA); Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.027, Special Education ? Grants to States; Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.173, Special Education ? Preschool Grants Criteria: 48 CFR Section 52.244-5(a) states, ?The Contractor shall select subcontractors (including suppliers) on a competitive basis to the maximum practical extent consistent with the objectives and requirements of the contract.? Further, 2 CFR Section 200.318(i) states, ?The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.? Condition: Both of the samples we selected for testing did not follow competitive bidding procedures or maintain documents as to the rationale for the method of procurement and contractor selection or rejection. Cause: The School District only renewed the contracts and did not provide for an opportunity for competitive bidding procedures. Effect or Potential Effect: The School District could be paying more than a reasonable amount for the services provided. Recommendation: The School District should follow state and federal procurement guidelines and select contractors on a competitive basis. The School District went through proper bidding procedures for 2022-23 fiscal year for procurement of services. Management?s Response: See corrective action plan.