Audit 54519

FY End
2022-06-30
Total Expended
$6.63M
Findings
32
Programs
14
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-01-22

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
42679 2022-007 Material Weakness Yes I
42680 2022-006 Material Weakness - N
42681 2022-007 Material Weakness Yes I
42682 2022-006 Material Weakness - N
42683 2022-007 Material Weakness Yes I
42684 2022-006 Material Weakness - N
42685 2022-007 Material Weakness Yes I
42686 2022-006 Material Weakness - N
42687 2022-007 Material Weakness Yes I
48121 2022-006 Material Weakness - N
57851 2022-006 Material Weakness - N
57852 2022-007 Material Weakness Yes I
57853 2022-007 Material Weakness Yes I
57854 2022-007 Material Weakness Yes I
57855 2022-007 Material Weakness Yes I
57856 2022-007 Material Weakness Yes I
619121 2022-007 Material Weakness Yes I
619122 2022-006 Material Weakness - N
619123 2022-007 Material Weakness Yes I
619124 2022-006 Material Weakness - N
619125 2022-007 Material Weakness Yes I
619126 2022-006 Material Weakness - N
619127 2022-007 Material Weakness Yes I
619128 2022-006 Material Weakness - N
619129 2022-007 Material Weakness Yes I
624563 2022-006 Material Weakness - N
634293 2022-006 Material Weakness - N
634294 2022-007 Material Weakness Yes I
634295 2022-007 Material Weakness Yes I
634296 2022-007 Material Weakness Yes I
634297 2022-007 Material Weakness Yes I
634298 2022-007 Material Weakness Yes I

Contacts

Name Title Type
UTGDL3KNJVH6 Matt Lacy, Ed.d. Auditee
5732439501 Jeffrey C. Stroder, CPA Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Accounting Policies: The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the Schedule) includes the federal award activity of Reorganized School District R-II of Cape Girardeau County under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2021. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part, 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of Reorganized School District R-II of Cape Girardeau County, Missouri, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of Reorganized School District R-II of Cape Girardeau County, Missouri. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the cash basis of accounting. Expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years.
Title: Federal Assurances Accounting Policies: The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the Schedule) includes the federal award activity of Reorganized School District R-II of Cape Girardeau County under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2021. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part, 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of Reorganized School District R-II of Cape Girardeau County, Missouri, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of Reorganized School District R-II of Cape Girardeau County, Missouri. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. Reorganized School District R-II of Cape Girardeau County, Missouri did not have federal insurance in effect during the year or have federal loan or loan guarantees outstanding at year end which are required to be reported in accordance with the Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

Federal Program: U.S. Department of Agriculture passed through Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education: Child Nutrition Cluster - School Breakfast Program (10.553) and National School Lunch Program (10.555); U.S. Department of Education passed through Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education: Special Education Cluster ? Special Education ? Grants to States (84.027) and Special Education ? Preschool Grants (84.173). Criteria: When a sub-recipient of federal awards uses federal money to acquire goods and services expected to cost more than $25,000, the sub-recipient must determine if the vendor is suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from doing business with the federal government. Condition: The district purchased goods from four vendors totaling greater than $25,000 that required the District to determine the vendor?s status with the federal government. Six vendors were verified for the child nutrition cluster, however this was not done until June 1, or the eleventh month of the fiscal year. One vendor was required to be verified from the special education cluster but this verification was not done. The vendors were, in fact, not excluded parties. The District needs to strengthen their internal controls in place to make sure all vendors are verified before the disbursements are made. Cause: One person was responsible for checking vendor status. The task was overlooked until near the end of the year for the child nutrition cluster and it was overlooked that there was an applicable vendor for the special education cluster. Effect: Even though the District did comply with the requirements not to purchase goods with excluded parties, failing to check the excluded parties list increases the risk that the District will make payments to ineligible vendors and potentially claim inappropriate reimbursement. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Payments to eligible vendors of the child nutrition cluster totaled $1,585,889. Payments to the eligible vendor of the special education cluster totaled $122,600. Repeat Finding: Yes. Recommendation: We recommend the District verify a vendor?s status by checking the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000 and paid with federal grants. Views of Responsible Officials: The District will verify all vendors? status using the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000.
Federal Program: U.S. Department of Agriculture passed through Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education: Child Nutrition Cluster - School Breakfast Program (10.553) and National School Lunch Program (10.555). Criteria: According to the School Nutrition Programs Administrative Handbook for school year 2021-2022, the food service program must limit its cash resources to an amount that does not exceed three months? average expenditures for its nonprofit school food service program. Condition: The District had a current year carryover of $1,439,907 and a three-month average operating cost of $1,032,450 resulting in an excess balance of $407,457. Cause: The District?s food service program has been operating at a profit in recent years and has accumulated the excess carryover. The District has found that in recent years, not all actual allowable costs of the program have been charged to the program. Effect: The District has accumulated surpluses in the food service program which is intended to be a non-profit program. The District runs the risk of either not providing services that have been paid for, or overcharging for services actually provided. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Actual Child Nutrition expenditures were $3,883,833. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the District monitor the profit made and ensure all expenditures used to operate the program are properly charged to the program. Views of Responsible Officials: The District will ensure that all eligible costs are charged to the program and modernize the equipment to reduce the accumulated carry-over.
Federal Program: U.S. Department of Agriculture passed through Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education: Child Nutrition Cluster - School Breakfast Program (10.553) and National School Lunch Program (10.555); U.S. Department of Education passed through Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education: Special Education Cluster ? Special Education ? Grants to States (84.027) and Special Education ? Preschool Grants (84.173). Criteria: When a sub-recipient of federal awards uses federal money to acquire goods and services expected to cost more than $25,000, the sub-recipient must determine if the vendor is suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from doing business with the federal government. Condition: The district purchased goods from four vendors totaling greater than $25,000 that required the District to determine the vendor?s status with the federal government. Six vendors were verified for the child nutrition cluster, however this was not done until June 1, or the eleventh month of the fiscal year. One vendor was required to be verified from the special education cluster but this verification was not done. The vendors were, in fact, not excluded parties. The District needs to strengthen their internal controls in place to make sure all vendors are verified before the disbursements are made. Cause: One person was responsible for checking vendor status. The task was overlooked until near the end of the year for the child nutrition cluster and it was overlooked that there was an applicable vendor for the special education cluster. Effect: Even though the District did comply with the requirements not to purchase goods with excluded parties, failing to check the excluded parties list increases the risk that the District will make payments to ineligible vendors and potentially claim inappropriate reimbursement. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Payments to eligible vendors of the child nutrition cluster totaled $1,585,889. Payments to the eligible vendor of the special education cluster totaled $122,600. Repeat Finding: Yes. Recommendation: We recommend the District verify a vendor?s status by checking the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000 and paid with federal grants. Views of Responsible Officials: The District will verify all vendors? status using the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000.
Federal Program: U.S. Department of Agriculture passed through Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education: Child Nutrition Cluster - School Breakfast Program (10.553) and National School Lunch Program (10.555). Criteria: According to the School Nutrition Programs Administrative Handbook for school year 2021-2022, the food service program must limit its cash resources to an amount that does not exceed three months? average expenditures for its nonprofit school food service program. Condition: The District had a current year carryover of $1,439,907 and a three-month average operating cost of $1,032,450 resulting in an excess balance of $407,457. Cause: The District?s food service program has been operating at a profit in recent years and has accumulated the excess carryover. The District has found that in recent years, not all actual allowable costs of the program have been charged to the program. Effect: The District has accumulated surpluses in the food service program which is intended to be a non-profit program. The District runs the risk of either not providing services that have been paid for, or overcharging for services actually provided. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Actual Child Nutrition expenditures were $3,883,833. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the District monitor the profit made and ensure all expenditures used to operate the program are properly charged to the program. Views of Responsible Officials: The District will ensure that all eligible costs are charged to the program and modernize the equipment to reduce the accumulated carry-over.
Federal Program: U.S. Department of Agriculture passed through Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education: Child Nutrition Cluster - School Breakfast Program (10.553) and National School Lunch Program (10.555); U.S. Department of Education passed through Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education: Special Education Cluster ? Special Education ? Grants to States (84.027) and Special Education ? Preschool Grants (84.173). Criteria: When a sub-recipient of federal awards uses federal money to acquire goods and services expected to cost more than $25,000, the sub-recipient must determine if the vendor is suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from doing business with the federal government. Condition: The district purchased goods from four vendors totaling greater than $25,000 that required the District to determine the vendor?s status with the federal government. Six vendors were verified for the child nutrition cluster, however this was not done until June 1, or the eleventh month of the fiscal year. One vendor was required to be verified from the special education cluster but this verification was not done. The vendors were, in fact, not excluded parties. The District needs to strengthen their internal controls in place to make sure all vendors are verified before the disbursements are made. Cause: One person was responsible for checking vendor status. The task was overlooked until near the end of the year for the child nutrition cluster and it was overlooked that there was an applicable vendor for the special education cluster. Effect: Even though the District did comply with the requirements not to purchase goods with excluded parties, failing to check the excluded parties list increases the risk that the District will make payments to ineligible vendors and potentially claim inappropriate reimbursement. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Payments to eligible vendors of the child nutrition cluster totaled $1,585,889. Payments to the eligible vendor of the special education cluster totaled $122,600. Repeat Finding: Yes. Recommendation: We recommend the District verify a vendor?s status by checking the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000 and paid with federal grants. Views of Responsible Officials: The District will verify all vendors? status using the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000.
Federal Program: U.S. Department of Agriculture passed through Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education: Child Nutrition Cluster - School Breakfast Program (10.553) and National School Lunch Program (10.555). Criteria: According to the School Nutrition Programs Administrative Handbook for school year 2021-2022, the food service program must limit its cash resources to an amount that does not exceed three months? average expenditures for its nonprofit school food service program. Condition: The District had a current year carryover of $1,439,907 and a three-month average operating cost of $1,032,450 resulting in an excess balance of $407,457. Cause: The District?s food service program has been operating at a profit in recent years and has accumulated the excess carryover. The District has found that in recent years, not all actual allowable costs of the program have been charged to the program. Effect: The District has accumulated surpluses in the food service program which is intended to be a non-profit program. The District runs the risk of either not providing services that have been paid for, or overcharging for services actually provided. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Actual Child Nutrition expenditures were $3,883,833. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the District monitor the profit made and ensure all expenditures used to operate the program are properly charged to the program. Views of Responsible Officials: The District will ensure that all eligible costs are charged to the program and modernize the equipment to reduce the accumulated carry-over.
Federal Program: U.S. Department of Agriculture passed through Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education: Child Nutrition Cluster - School Breakfast Program (10.553) and National School Lunch Program (10.555); U.S. Department of Education passed through Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education: Special Education Cluster ? Special Education ? Grants to States (84.027) and Special Education ? Preschool Grants (84.173). Criteria: When a sub-recipient of federal awards uses federal money to acquire goods and services expected to cost more than $25,000, the sub-recipient must determine if the vendor is suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from doing business with the federal government. Condition: The district purchased goods from four vendors totaling greater than $25,000 that required the District to determine the vendor?s status with the federal government. Six vendors were verified for the child nutrition cluster, however this was not done until June 1, or the eleventh month of the fiscal year. One vendor was required to be verified from the special education cluster but this verification was not done. The vendors were, in fact, not excluded parties. The District needs to strengthen their internal controls in place to make sure all vendors are verified before the disbursements are made. Cause: One person was responsible for checking vendor status. The task was overlooked until near the end of the year for the child nutrition cluster and it was overlooked that there was an applicable vendor for the special education cluster. Effect: Even though the District did comply with the requirements not to purchase goods with excluded parties, failing to check the excluded parties list increases the risk that the District will make payments to ineligible vendors and potentially claim inappropriate reimbursement. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Payments to eligible vendors of the child nutrition cluster totaled $1,585,889. Payments to the eligible vendor of the special education cluster totaled $122,600. Repeat Finding: Yes. Recommendation: We recommend the District verify a vendor?s status by checking the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000 and paid with federal grants. Views of Responsible Officials: The District will verify all vendors? status using the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000.
Federal Program: U.S. Department of Agriculture passed through Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education: Child Nutrition Cluster - School Breakfast Program (10.553) and National School Lunch Program (10.555). Criteria: According to the School Nutrition Programs Administrative Handbook for school year 2021-2022, the food service program must limit its cash resources to an amount that does not exceed three months? average expenditures for its nonprofit school food service program. Condition: The District had a current year carryover of $1,439,907 and a three-month average operating cost of $1,032,450 resulting in an excess balance of $407,457. Cause: The District?s food service program has been operating at a profit in recent years and has accumulated the excess carryover. The District has found that in recent years, not all actual allowable costs of the program have been charged to the program. Effect: The District has accumulated surpluses in the food service program which is intended to be a non-profit program. The District runs the risk of either not providing services that have been paid for, or overcharging for services actually provided. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Actual Child Nutrition expenditures were $3,883,833. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the District monitor the profit made and ensure all expenditures used to operate the program are properly charged to the program. Views of Responsible Officials: The District will ensure that all eligible costs are charged to the program and modernize the equipment to reduce the accumulated carry-over.
Federal Program: U.S. Department of Agriculture passed through Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education: Child Nutrition Cluster - School Breakfast Program (10.553) and National School Lunch Program (10.555); U.S. Department of Education passed through Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education: Special Education Cluster ? Special Education ? Grants to States (84.027) and Special Education ? Preschool Grants (84.173). Criteria: When a sub-recipient of federal awards uses federal money to acquire goods and services expected to cost more than $25,000, the sub-recipient must determine if the vendor is suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from doing business with the federal government. Condition: The district purchased goods from four vendors totaling greater than $25,000 that required the District to determine the vendor?s status with the federal government. Six vendors were verified for the child nutrition cluster, however this was not done until June 1, or the eleventh month of the fiscal year. One vendor was required to be verified from the special education cluster but this verification was not done. The vendors were, in fact, not excluded parties. The District needs to strengthen their internal controls in place to make sure all vendors are verified before the disbursements are made. Cause: One person was responsible for checking vendor status. The task was overlooked until near the end of the year for the child nutrition cluster and it was overlooked that there was an applicable vendor for the special education cluster. Effect: Even though the District did comply with the requirements not to purchase goods with excluded parties, failing to check the excluded parties list increases the risk that the District will make payments to ineligible vendors and potentially claim inappropriate reimbursement. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Payments to eligible vendors of the child nutrition cluster totaled $1,585,889. Payments to the eligible vendor of the special education cluster totaled $122,600. Repeat Finding: Yes. Recommendation: We recommend the District verify a vendor?s status by checking the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000 and paid with federal grants. Views of Responsible Officials: The District will verify all vendors? status using the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000.
Federal Program: U.S. Department of Agriculture passed through Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education: Child Nutrition Cluster - School Breakfast Program (10.553) and National School Lunch Program (10.555). Criteria: According to the School Nutrition Programs Administrative Handbook for school year 2021-2022, the food service program must limit its cash resources to an amount that does not exceed three months? average expenditures for its nonprofit school food service program. Condition: The District had a current year carryover of $1,439,907 and a three-month average operating cost of $1,032,450 resulting in an excess balance of $407,457. Cause: The District?s food service program has been operating at a profit in recent years and has accumulated the excess carryover. The District has found that in recent years, not all actual allowable costs of the program have been charged to the program. Effect: The District has accumulated surpluses in the food service program which is intended to be a non-profit program. The District runs the risk of either not providing services that have been paid for, or overcharging for services actually provided. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Actual Child Nutrition expenditures were $3,883,833. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the District monitor the profit made and ensure all expenditures used to operate the program are properly charged to the program. Views of Responsible Officials: The District will ensure that all eligible costs are charged to the program and modernize the equipment to reduce the accumulated carry-over.
Federal Program: U.S. Department of Agriculture passed through Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education: Child Nutrition Cluster - School Breakfast Program (10.553) and National School Lunch Program (10.555). Criteria: According to the School Nutrition Programs Administrative Handbook for school year 2021-2022, the food service program must limit its cash resources to an amount that does not exceed three months? average expenditures for its nonprofit school food service program. Condition: The District had a current year carryover of $1,439,907 and a three-month average operating cost of $1,032,450 resulting in an excess balance of $407,457. Cause: The District?s food service program has been operating at a profit in recent years and has accumulated the excess carryover. The District has found that in recent years, not all actual allowable costs of the program have been charged to the program. Effect: The District has accumulated surpluses in the food service program which is intended to be a non-profit program. The District runs the risk of either not providing services that have been paid for, or overcharging for services actually provided. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Actual Child Nutrition expenditures were $3,883,833. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the District monitor the profit made and ensure all expenditures used to operate the program are properly charged to the program. Views of Responsible Officials: The District will ensure that all eligible costs are charged to the program and modernize the equipment to reduce the accumulated carry-over.
Federal Program: U.S. Department of Agriculture passed through Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education: Child Nutrition Cluster - School Breakfast Program (10.553) and National School Lunch Program (10.555); U.S. Department of Education passed through Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education: Special Education Cluster ? Special Education ? Grants to States (84.027) and Special Education ? Preschool Grants (84.173). Criteria: When a sub-recipient of federal awards uses federal money to acquire goods and services expected to cost more than $25,000, the sub-recipient must determine if the vendor is suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from doing business with the federal government. Condition: The district purchased goods from four vendors totaling greater than $25,000 that required the District to determine the vendor?s status with the federal government. Six vendors were verified for the child nutrition cluster, however this was not done until June 1, or the eleventh month of the fiscal year. One vendor was required to be verified from the special education cluster but this verification was not done. The vendors were, in fact, not excluded parties. The District needs to strengthen their internal controls in place to make sure all vendors are verified before the disbursements are made. Cause: One person was responsible for checking vendor status. The task was overlooked until near the end of the year for the child nutrition cluster and it was overlooked that there was an applicable vendor for the special education cluster. Effect: Even though the District did comply with the requirements not to purchase goods with excluded parties, failing to check the excluded parties list increases the risk that the District will make payments to ineligible vendors and potentially claim inappropriate reimbursement. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Payments to eligible vendors of the child nutrition cluster totaled $1,585,889. Payments to the eligible vendor of the special education cluster totaled $122,600. Repeat Finding: Yes. Recommendation: We recommend the District verify a vendor?s status by checking the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000 and paid with federal grants. Views of Responsible Officials: The District will verify all vendors? status using the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000.
Federal Program: U.S. Department of Agriculture passed through Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education: Child Nutrition Cluster - School Breakfast Program (10.553) and National School Lunch Program (10.555); U.S. Department of Education passed through Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education: Special Education Cluster ? Special Education ? Grants to States (84.027) and Special Education ? Preschool Grants (84.173). Criteria: When a sub-recipient of federal awards uses federal money to acquire goods and services expected to cost more than $25,000, the sub-recipient must determine if the vendor is suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from doing business with the federal government. Condition: The district purchased goods from four vendors totaling greater than $25,000 that required the District to determine the vendor?s status with the federal government. Six vendors were verified for the child nutrition cluster, however this was not done until June 1, or the eleventh month of the fiscal year. One vendor was required to be verified from the special education cluster but this verification was not done. The vendors were, in fact, not excluded parties. The District needs to strengthen their internal controls in place to make sure all vendors are verified before the disbursements are made. Cause: One person was responsible for checking vendor status. The task was overlooked until near the end of the year for the child nutrition cluster and it was overlooked that there was an applicable vendor for the special education cluster. Effect: Even though the District did comply with the requirements not to purchase goods with excluded parties, failing to check the excluded parties list increases the risk that the District will make payments to ineligible vendors and potentially claim inappropriate reimbursement. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Payments to eligible vendors of the child nutrition cluster totaled $1,585,889. Payments to the eligible vendor of the special education cluster totaled $122,600. Repeat Finding: Yes. Recommendation: We recommend the District verify a vendor?s status by checking the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000 and paid with federal grants. Views of Responsible Officials: The District will verify all vendors? status using the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000.
Federal Program: U.S. Department of Agriculture passed through Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education: Child Nutrition Cluster - School Breakfast Program (10.553) and National School Lunch Program (10.555); U.S. Department of Education passed through Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education: Special Education Cluster ? Special Education ? Grants to States (84.027) and Special Education ? Preschool Grants (84.173). Criteria: When a sub-recipient of federal awards uses federal money to acquire goods and services expected to cost more than $25,000, the sub-recipient must determine if the vendor is suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from doing business with the federal government. Condition: The district purchased goods from four vendors totaling greater than $25,000 that required the District to determine the vendor?s status with the federal government. Six vendors were verified for the child nutrition cluster, however this was not done until June 1, or the eleventh month of the fiscal year. One vendor was required to be verified from the special education cluster but this verification was not done. The vendors were, in fact, not excluded parties. The District needs to strengthen their internal controls in place to make sure all vendors are verified before the disbursements are made. Cause: One person was responsible for checking vendor status. The task was overlooked until near the end of the year for the child nutrition cluster and it was overlooked that there was an applicable vendor for the special education cluster. Effect: Even though the District did comply with the requirements not to purchase goods with excluded parties, failing to check the excluded parties list increases the risk that the District will make payments to ineligible vendors and potentially claim inappropriate reimbursement. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Payments to eligible vendors of the child nutrition cluster totaled $1,585,889. Payments to the eligible vendor of the special education cluster totaled $122,600. Repeat Finding: Yes. Recommendation: We recommend the District verify a vendor?s status by checking the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000 and paid with federal grants. Views of Responsible Officials: The District will verify all vendors? status using the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000.
Federal Program: U.S. Department of Agriculture passed through Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education: Child Nutrition Cluster - School Breakfast Program (10.553) and National School Lunch Program (10.555); U.S. Department of Education passed through Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education: Special Education Cluster ? Special Education ? Grants to States (84.027) and Special Education ? Preschool Grants (84.173). Criteria: When a sub-recipient of federal awards uses federal money to acquire goods and services expected to cost more than $25,000, the sub-recipient must determine if the vendor is suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from doing business with the federal government. Condition: The district purchased goods from four vendors totaling greater than $25,000 that required the District to determine the vendor?s status with the federal government. Six vendors were verified for the child nutrition cluster, however this was not done until June 1, or the eleventh month of the fiscal year. One vendor was required to be verified from the special education cluster but this verification was not done. The vendors were, in fact, not excluded parties. The District needs to strengthen their internal controls in place to make sure all vendors are verified before the disbursements are made. Cause: One person was responsible for checking vendor status. The task was overlooked until near the end of the year for the child nutrition cluster and it was overlooked that there was an applicable vendor for the special education cluster. Effect: Even though the District did comply with the requirements not to purchase goods with excluded parties, failing to check the excluded parties list increases the risk that the District will make payments to ineligible vendors and potentially claim inappropriate reimbursement. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Payments to eligible vendors of the child nutrition cluster totaled $1,585,889. Payments to the eligible vendor of the special education cluster totaled $122,600. Repeat Finding: Yes. Recommendation: We recommend the District verify a vendor?s status by checking the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000 and paid with federal grants. Views of Responsible Officials: The District will verify all vendors? status using the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000.
Federal Program: U.S. Department of Agriculture passed through Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education: Child Nutrition Cluster - School Breakfast Program (10.553) and National School Lunch Program (10.555); U.S. Department of Education passed through Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education: Special Education Cluster ? Special Education ? Grants to States (84.027) and Special Education ? Preschool Grants (84.173). Criteria: When a sub-recipient of federal awards uses federal money to acquire goods and services expected to cost more than $25,000, the sub-recipient must determine if the vendor is suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from doing business with the federal government. Condition: The district purchased goods from four vendors totaling greater than $25,000 that required the District to determine the vendor?s status with the federal government. Six vendors were verified for the child nutrition cluster, however this was not done until June 1, or the eleventh month of the fiscal year. One vendor was required to be verified from the special education cluster but this verification was not done. The vendors were, in fact, not excluded parties. The District needs to strengthen their internal controls in place to make sure all vendors are verified before the disbursements are made. Cause: One person was responsible for checking vendor status. The task was overlooked until near the end of the year for the child nutrition cluster and it was overlooked that there was an applicable vendor for the special education cluster. Effect: Even though the District did comply with the requirements not to purchase goods with excluded parties, failing to check the excluded parties list increases the risk that the District will make payments to ineligible vendors and potentially claim inappropriate reimbursement. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Payments to eligible vendors of the child nutrition cluster totaled $1,585,889. Payments to the eligible vendor of the special education cluster totaled $122,600. Repeat Finding: Yes. Recommendation: We recommend the District verify a vendor?s status by checking the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000 and paid with federal grants. Views of Responsible Officials: The District will verify all vendors? status using the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000.
Federal Program: U.S. Department of Agriculture passed through Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education: Child Nutrition Cluster - School Breakfast Program (10.553) and National School Lunch Program (10.555); U.S. Department of Education passed through Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education: Special Education Cluster ? Special Education ? Grants to States (84.027) and Special Education ? Preschool Grants (84.173). Criteria: When a sub-recipient of federal awards uses federal money to acquire goods and services expected to cost more than $25,000, the sub-recipient must determine if the vendor is suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from doing business with the federal government. Condition: The district purchased goods from four vendors totaling greater than $25,000 that required the District to determine the vendor?s status with the federal government. Six vendors were verified for the child nutrition cluster, however this was not done until June 1, or the eleventh month of the fiscal year. One vendor was required to be verified from the special education cluster but this verification was not done. The vendors were, in fact, not excluded parties. The District needs to strengthen their internal controls in place to make sure all vendors are verified before the disbursements are made. Cause: One person was responsible for checking vendor status. The task was overlooked until near the end of the year for the child nutrition cluster and it was overlooked that there was an applicable vendor for the special education cluster. Effect: Even though the District did comply with the requirements not to purchase goods with excluded parties, failing to check the excluded parties list increases the risk that the District will make payments to ineligible vendors and potentially claim inappropriate reimbursement. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Payments to eligible vendors of the child nutrition cluster totaled $1,585,889. Payments to the eligible vendor of the special education cluster totaled $122,600. Repeat Finding: Yes. Recommendation: We recommend the District verify a vendor?s status by checking the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000 and paid with federal grants. Views of Responsible Officials: The District will verify all vendors? status using the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000.
Federal Program: U.S. Department of Agriculture passed through Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education: Child Nutrition Cluster - School Breakfast Program (10.553) and National School Lunch Program (10.555). Criteria: According to the School Nutrition Programs Administrative Handbook for school year 2021-2022, the food service program must limit its cash resources to an amount that does not exceed three months? average expenditures for its nonprofit school food service program. Condition: The District had a current year carryover of $1,439,907 and a three-month average operating cost of $1,032,450 resulting in an excess balance of $407,457. Cause: The District?s food service program has been operating at a profit in recent years and has accumulated the excess carryover. The District has found that in recent years, not all actual allowable costs of the program have been charged to the program. Effect: The District has accumulated surpluses in the food service program which is intended to be a non-profit program. The District runs the risk of either not providing services that have been paid for, or overcharging for services actually provided. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Actual Child Nutrition expenditures were $3,883,833. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the District monitor the profit made and ensure all expenditures used to operate the program are properly charged to the program. Views of Responsible Officials: The District will ensure that all eligible costs are charged to the program and modernize the equipment to reduce the accumulated carry-over.
Federal Program: U.S. Department of Agriculture passed through Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education: Child Nutrition Cluster - School Breakfast Program (10.553) and National School Lunch Program (10.555); U.S. Department of Education passed through Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education: Special Education Cluster ? Special Education ? Grants to States (84.027) and Special Education ? Preschool Grants (84.173). Criteria: When a sub-recipient of federal awards uses federal money to acquire goods and services expected to cost more than $25,000, the sub-recipient must determine if the vendor is suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from doing business with the federal government. Condition: The district purchased goods from four vendors totaling greater than $25,000 that required the District to determine the vendor?s status with the federal government. Six vendors were verified for the child nutrition cluster, however this was not done until June 1, or the eleventh month of the fiscal year. One vendor was required to be verified from the special education cluster but this verification was not done. The vendors were, in fact, not excluded parties. The District needs to strengthen their internal controls in place to make sure all vendors are verified before the disbursements are made. Cause: One person was responsible for checking vendor status. The task was overlooked until near the end of the year for the child nutrition cluster and it was overlooked that there was an applicable vendor for the special education cluster. Effect: Even though the District did comply with the requirements not to purchase goods with excluded parties, failing to check the excluded parties list increases the risk that the District will make payments to ineligible vendors and potentially claim inappropriate reimbursement. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Payments to eligible vendors of the child nutrition cluster totaled $1,585,889. Payments to the eligible vendor of the special education cluster totaled $122,600. Repeat Finding: Yes. Recommendation: We recommend the District verify a vendor?s status by checking the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000 and paid with federal grants. Views of Responsible Officials: The District will verify all vendors? status using the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000.
Federal Program: U.S. Department of Agriculture passed through Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education: Child Nutrition Cluster - School Breakfast Program (10.553) and National School Lunch Program (10.555). Criteria: According to the School Nutrition Programs Administrative Handbook for school year 2021-2022, the food service program must limit its cash resources to an amount that does not exceed three months? average expenditures for its nonprofit school food service program. Condition: The District had a current year carryover of $1,439,907 and a three-month average operating cost of $1,032,450 resulting in an excess balance of $407,457. Cause: The District?s food service program has been operating at a profit in recent years and has accumulated the excess carryover. The District has found that in recent years, not all actual allowable costs of the program have been charged to the program. Effect: The District has accumulated surpluses in the food service program which is intended to be a non-profit program. The District runs the risk of either not providing services that have been paid for, or overcharging for services actually provided. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Actual Child Nutrition expenditures were $3,883,833. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the District monitor the profit made and ensure all expenditures used to operate the program are properly charged to the program. Views of Responsible Officials: The District will ensure that all eligible costs are charged to the program and modernize the equipment to reduce the accumulated carry-over.
Federal Program: U.S. Department of Agriculture passed through Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education: Child Nutrition Cluster - School Breakfast Program (10.553) and National School Lunch Program (10.555); U.S. Department of Education passed through Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education: Special Education Cluster ? Special Education ? Grants to States (84.027) and Special Education ? Preschool Grants (84.173). Criteria: When a sub-recipient of federal awards uses federal money to acquire goods and services expected to cost more than $25,000, the sub-recipient must determine if the vendor is suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from doing business with the federal government. Condition: The district purchased goods from four vendors totaling greater than $25,000 that required the District to determine the vendor?s status with the federal government. Six vendors were verified for the child nutrition cluster, however this was not done until June 1, or the eleventh month of the fiscal year. One vendor was required to be verified from the special education cluster but this verification was not done. The vendors were, in fact, not excluded parties. The District needs to strengthen their internal controls in place to make sure all vendors are verified before the disbursements are made. Cause: One person was responsible for checking vendor status. The task was overlooked until near the end of the year for the child nutrition cluster and it was overlooked that there was an applicable vendor for the special education cluster. Effect: Even though the District did comply with the requirements not to purchase goods with excluded parties, failing to check the excluded parties list increases the risk that the District will make payments to ineligible vendors and potentially claim inappropriate reimbursement. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Payments to eligible vendors of the child nutrition cluster totaled $1,585,889. Payments to the eligible vendor of the special education cluster totaled $122,600. Repeat Finding: Yes. Recommendation: We recommend the District verify a vendor?s status by checking the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000 and paid with federal grants. Views of Responsible Officials: The District will verify all vendors? status using the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000.
Federal Program: U.S. Department of Agriculture passed through Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education: Child Nutrition Cluster - School Breakfast Program (10.553) and National School Lunch Program (10.555). Criteria: According to the School Nutrition Programs Administrative Handbook for school year 2021-2022, the food service program must limit its cash resources to an amount that does not exceed three months? average expenditures for its nonprofit school food service program. Condition: The District had a current year carryover of $1,439,907 and a three-month average operating cost of $1,032,450 resulting in an excess balance of $407,457. Cause: The District?s food service program has been operating at a profit in recent years and has accumulated the excess carryover. The District has found that in recent years, not all actual allowable costs of the program have been charged to the program. Effect: The District has accumulated surpluses in the food service program which is intended to be a non-profit program. The District runs the risk of either not providing services that have been paid for, or overcharging for services actually provided. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Actual Child Nutrition expenditures were $3,883,833. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the District monitor the profit made and ensure all expenditures used to operate the program are properly charged to the program. Views of Responsible Officials: The District will ensure that all eligible costs are charged to the program and modernize the equipment to reduce the accumulated carry-over.
Federal Program: U.S. Department of Agriculture passed through Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education: Child Nutrition Cluster - School Breakfast Program (10.553) and National School Lunch Program (10.555); U.S. Department of Education passed through Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education: Special Education Cluster ? Special Education ? Grants to States (84.027) and Special Education ? Preschool Grants (84.173). Criteria: When a sub-recipient of federal awards uses federal money to acquire goods and services expected to cost more than $25,000, the sub-recipient must determine if the vendor is suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from doing business with the federal government. Condition: The district purchased goods from four vendors totaling greater than $25,000 that required the District to determine the vendor?s status with the federal government. Six vendors were verified for the child nutrition cluster, however this was not done until June 1, or the eleventh month of the fiscal year. One vendor was required to be verified from the special education cluster but this verification was not done. The vendors were, in fact, not excluded parties. The District needs to strengthen their internal controls in place to make sure all vendors are verified before the disbursements are made. Cause: One person was responsible for checking vendor status. The task was overlooked until near the end of the year for the child nutrition cluster and it was overlooked that there was an applicable vendor for the special education cluster. Effect: Even though the District did comply with the requirements not to purchase goods with excluded parties, failing to check the excluded parties list increases the risk that the District will make payments to ineligible vendors and potentially claim inappropriate reimbursement. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Payments to eligible vendors of the child nutrition cluster totaled $1,585,889. Payments to the eligible vendor of the special education cluster totaled $122,600. Repeat Finding: Yes. Recommendation: We recommend the District verify a vendor?s status by checking the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000 and paid with federal grants. Views of Responsible Officials: The District will verify all vendors? status using the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000.
Federal Program: U.S. Department of Agriculture passed through Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education: Child Nutrition Cluster - School Breakfast Program (10.553) and National School Lunch Program (10.555). Criteria: According to the School Nutrition Programs Administrative Handbook for school year 2021-2022, the food service program must limit its cash resources to an amount that does not exceed three months? average expenditures for its nonprofit school food service program. Condition: The District had a current year carryover of $1,439,907 and a three-month average operating cost of $1,032,450 resulting in an excess balance of $407,457. Cause: The District?s food service program has been operating at a profit in recent years and has accumulated the excess carryover. The District has found that in recent years, not all actual allowable costs of the program have been charged to the program. Effect: The District has accumulated surpluses in the food service program which is intended to be a non-profit program. The District runs the risk of either not providing services that have been paid for, or overcharging for services actually provided. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Actual Child Nutrition expenditures were $3,883,833. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the District monitor the profit made and ensure all expenditures used to operate the program are properly charged to the program. Views of Responsible Officials: The District will ensure that all eligible costs are charged to the program and modernize the equipment to reduce the accumulated carry-over.
Federal Program: U.S. Department of Agriculture passed through Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education: Child Nutrition Cluster - School Breakfast Program (10.553) and National School Lunch Program (10.555); U.S. Department of Education passed through Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education: Special Education Cluster ? Special Education ? Grants to States (84.027) and Special Education ? Preschool Grants (84.173). Criteria: When a sub-recipient of federal awards uses federal money to acquire goods and services expected to cost more than $25,000, the sub-recipient must determine if the vendor is suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from doing business with the federal government. Condition: The district purchased goods from four vendors totaling greater than $25,000 that required the District to determine the vendor?s status with the federal government. Six vendors were verified for the child nutrition cluster, however this was not done until June 1, or the eleventh month of the fiscal year. One vendor was required to be verified from the special education cluster but this verification was not done. The vendors were, in fact, not excluded parties. The District needs to strengthen their internal controls in place to make sure all vendors are verified before the disbursements are made. Cause: One person was responsible for checking vendor status. The task was overlooked until near the end of the year for the child nutrition cluster and it was overlooked that there was an applicable vendor for the special education cluster. Effect: Even though the District did comply with the requirements not to purchase goods with excluded parties, failing to check the excluded parties list increases the risk that the District will make payments to ineligible vendors and potentially claim inappropriate reimbursement. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Payments to eligible vendors of the child nutrition cluster totaled $1,585,889. Payments to the eligible vendor of the special education cluster totaled $122,600. Repeat Finding: Yes. Recommendation: We recommend the District verify a vendor?s status by checking the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000 and paid with federal grants. Views of Responsible Officials: The District will verify all vendors? status using the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000.
Federal Program: U.S. Department of Agriculture passed through Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education: Child Nutrition Cluster - School Breakfast Program (10.553) and National School Lunch Program (10.555). Criteria: According to the School Nutrition Programs Administrative Handbook for school year 2021-2022, the food service program must limit its cash resources to an amount that does not exceed three months? average expenditures for its nonprofit school food service program. Condition: The District had a current year carryover of $1,439,907 and a three-month average operating cost of $1,032,450 resulting in an excess balance of $407,457. Cause: The District?s food service program has been operating at a profit in recent years and has accumulated the excess carryover. The District has found that in recent years, not all actual allowable costs of the program have been charged to the program. Effect: The District has accumulated surpluses in the food service program which is intended to be a non-profit program. The District runs the risk of either not providing services that have been paid for, or overcharging for services actually provided. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Actual Child Nutrition expenditures were $3,883,833. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the District monitor the profit made and ensure all expenditures used to operate the program are properly charged to the program. Views of Responsible Officials: The District will ensure that all eligible costs are charged to the program and modernize the equipment to reduce the accumulated carry-over.
Federal Program: U.S. Department of Agriculture passed through Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education: Child Nutrition Cluster - School Breakfast Program (10.553) and National School Lunch Program (10.555). Criteria: According to the School Nutrition Programs Administrative Handbook for school year 2021-2022, the food service program must limit its cash resources to an amount that does not exceed three months? average expenditures for its nonprofit school food service program. Condition: The District had a current year carryover of $1,439,907 and a three-month average operating cost of $1,032,450 resulting in an excess balance of $407,457. Cause: The District?s food service program has been operating at a profit in recent years and has accumulated the excess carryover. The District has found that in recent years, not all actual allowable costs of the program have been charged to the program. Effect: The District has accumulated surpluses in the food service program which is intended to be a non-profit program. The District runs the risk of either not providing services that have been paid for, or overcharging for services actually provided. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Actual Child Nutrition expenditures were $3,883,833. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the District monitor the profit made and ensure all expenditures used to operate the program are properly charged to the program. Views of Responsible Officials: The District will ensure that all eligible costs are charged to the program and modernize the equipment to reduce the accumulated carry-over.
Federal Program: U.S. Department of Agriculture passed through Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education: Child Nutrition Cluster - School Breakfast Program (10.553) and National School Lunch Program (10.555); U.S. Department of Education passed through Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education: Special Education Cluster ? Special Education ? Grants to States (84.027) and Special Education ? Preschool Grants (84.173). Criteria: When a sub-recipient of federal awards uses federal money to acquire goods and services expected to cost more than $25,000, the sub-recipient must determine if the vendor is suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from doing business with the federal government. Condition: The district purchased goods from four vendors totaling greater than $25,000 that required the District to determine the vendor?s status with the federal government. Six vendors were verified for the child nutrition cluster, however this was not done until June 1, or the eleventh month of the fiscal year. One vendor was required to be verified from the special education cluster but this verification was not done. The vendors were, in fact, not excluded parties. The District needs to strengthen their internal controls in place to make sure all vendors are verified before the disbursements are made. Cause: One person was responsible for checking vendor status. The task was overlooked until near the end of the year for the child nutrition cluster and it was overlooked that there was an applicable vendor for the special education cluster. Effect: Even though the District did comply with the requirements not to purchase goods with excluded parties, failing to check the excluded parties list increases the risk that the District will make payments to ineligible vendors and potentially claim inappropriate reimbursement. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Payments to eligible vendors of the child nutrition cluster totaled $1,585,889. Payments to the eligible vendor of the special education cluster totaled $122,600. Repeat Finding: Yes. Recommendation: We recommend the District verify a vendor?s status by checking the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000 and paid with federal grants. Views of Responsible Officials: The District will verify all vendors? status using the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000.
Federal Program: U.S. Department of Agriculture passed through Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education: Child Nutrition Cluster - School Breakfast Program (10.553) and National School Lunch Program (10.555); U.S. Department of Education passed through Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education: Special Education Cluster ? Special Education ? Grants to States (84.027) and Special Education ? Preschool Grants (84.173). Criteria: When a sub-recipient of federal awards uses federal money to acquire goods and services expected to cost more than $25,000, the sub-recipient must determine if the vendor is suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from doing business with the federal government. Condition: The district purchased goods from four vendors totaling greater than $25,000 that required the District to determine the vendor?s status with the federal government. Six vendors were verified for the child nutrition cluster, however this was not done until June 1, or the eleventh month of the fiscal year. One vendor was required to be verified from the special education cluster but this verification was not done. The vendors were, in fact, not excluded parties. The District needs to strengthen their internal controls in place to make sure all vendors are verified before the disbursements are made. Cause: One person was responsible for checking vendor status. The task was overlooked until near the end of the year for the child nutrition cluster and it was overlooked that there was an applicable vendor for the special education cluster. Effect: Even though the District did comply with the requirements not to purchase goods with excluded parties, failing to check the excluded parties list increases the risk that the District will make payments to ineligible vendors and potentially claim inappropriate reimbursement. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Payments to eligible vendors of the child nutrition cluster totaled $1,585,889. Payments to the eligible vendor of the special education cluster totaled $122,600. Repeat Finding: Yes. Recommendation: We recommend the District verify a vendor?s status by checking the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000 and paid with federal grants. Views of Responsible Officials: The District will verify all vendors? status using the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000.
Federal Program: U.S. Department of Agriculture passed through Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education: Child Nutrition Cluster - School Breakfast Program (10.553) and National School Lunch Program (10.555); U.S. Department of Education passed through Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education: Special Education Cluster ? Special Education ? Grants to States (84.027) and Special Education ? Preschool Grants (84.173). Criteria: When a sub-recipient of federal awards uses federal money to acquire goods and services expected to cost more than $25,000, the sub-recipient must determine if the vendor is suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from doing business with the federal government. Condition: The district purchased goods from four vendors totaling greater than $25,000 that required the District to determine the vendor?s status with the federal government. Six vendors were verified for the child nutrition cluster, however this was not done until June 1, or the eleventh month of the fiscal year. One vendor was required to be verified from the special education cluster but this verification was not done. The vendors were, in fact, not excluded parties. The District needs to strengthen their internal controls in place to make sure all vendors are verified before the disbursements are made. Cause: One person was responsible for checking vendor status. The task was overlooked until near the end of the year for the child nutrition cluster and it was overlooked that there was an applicable vendor for the special education cluster. Effect: Even though the District did comply with the requirements not to purchase goods with excluded parties, failing to check the excluded parties list increases the risk that the District will make payments to ineligible vendors and potentially claim inappropriate reimbursement. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Payments to eligible vendors of the child nutrition cluster totaled $1,585,889. Payments to the eligible vendor of the special education cluster totaled $122,600. Repeat Finding: Yes. Recommendation: We recommend the District verify a vendor?s status by checking the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000 and paid with federal grants. Views of Responsible Officials: The District will verify all vendors? status using the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000.
Federal Program: U.S. Department of Agriculture passed through Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education: Child Nutrition Cluster - School Breakfast Program (10.553) and National School Lunch Program (10.555); U.S. Department of Education passed through Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education: Special Education Cluster ? Special Education ? Grants to States (84.027) and Special Education ? Preschool Grants (84.173). Criteria: When a sub-recipient of federal awards uses federal money to acquire goods and services expected to cost more than $25,000, the sub-recipient must determine if the vendor is suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from doing business with the federal government. Condition: The district purchased goods from four vendors totaling greater than $25,000 that required the District to determine the vendor?s status with the federal government. Six vendors were verified for the child nutrition cluster, however this was not done until June 1, or the eleventh month of the fiscal year. One vendor was required to be verified from the special education cluster but this verification was not done. The vendors were, in fact, not excluded parties. The District needs to strengthen their internal controls in place to make sure all vendors are verified before the disbursements are made. Cause: One person was responsible for checking vendor status. The task was overlooked until near the end of the year for the child nutrition cluster and it was overlooked that there was an applicable vendor for the special education cluster. Effect: Even though the District did comply with the requirements not to purchase goods with excluded parties, failing to check the excluded parties list increases the risk that the District will make payments to ineligible vendors and potentially claim inappropriate reimbursement. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Payments to eligible vendors of the child nutrition cluster totaled $1,585,889. Payments to the eligible vendor of the special education cluster totaled $122,600. Repeat Finding: Yes. Recommendation: We recommend the District verify a vendor?s status by checking the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000 and paid with federal grants. Views of Responsible Officials: The District will verify all vendors? status using the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000.
Federal Program: U.S. Department of Agriculture passed through Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education: Child Nutrition Cluster - School Breakfast Program (10.553) and National School Lunch Program (10.555); U.S. Department of Education passed through Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education: Special Education Cluster ? Special Education ? Grants to States (84.027) and Special Education ? Preschool Grants (84.173). Criteria: When a sub-recipient of federal awards uses federal money to acquire goods and services expected to cost more than $25,000, the sub-recipient must determine if the vendor is suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from doing business with the federal government. Condition: The district purchased goods from four vendors totaling greater than $25,000 that required the District to determine the vendor?s status with the federal government. Six vendors were verified for the child nutrition cluster, however this was not done until June 1, or the eleventh month of the fiscal year. One vendor was required to be verified from the special education cluster but this verification was not done. The vendors were, in fact, not excluded parties. The District needs to strengthen their internal controls in place to make sure all vendors are verified before the disbursements are made. Cause: One person was responsible for checking vendor status. The task was overlooked until near the end of the year for the child nutrition cluster and it was overlooked that there was an applicable vendor for the special education cluster. Effect: Even though the District did comply with the requirements not to purchase goods with excluded parties, failing to check the excluded parties list increases the risk that the District will make payments to ineligible vendors and potentially claim inappropriate reimbursement. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Payments to eligible vendors of the child nutrition cluster totaled $1,585,889. Payments to the eligible vendor of the special education cluster totaled $122,600. Repeat Finding: Yes. Recommendation: We recommend the District verify a vendor?s status by checking the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000 and paid with federal grants. Views of Responsible Officials: The District will verify all vendors? status using the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000.