USDA Foods Receipts: Criteria: Evidence of distribution in the form of signed invoices for USDA Foods is required to be maintained for CSFP and TEFAP. Evidence of receipt of USDA foods should be maintained to ensure compliance with the award. Condition: Signed invoices evidencing USDA food distributed were not retained. Context: Our sample of 25 distributions of USDA Foods included two instances where invoices were not properly signed and one instance where the invoice was not retained. Known and likely questioned costs are unknown. Effect: GSFB runs the risk that improper distribution will not be prevented without appropriate document retention. Cause: In all three instances, administrative issues resulted in the untimely lack of retention of signed invoices. Recommendation: We recommend that GSFB reinforce the importance of retaining signed invoices in accordance with award requirements. GSFB should further assign an individual within their organization to assume a higher level of direct responsibility for the administration of federal awards by GSFB. Views of Responsible Officials: GSFB staff audit sales order paperwork in connection with product received from Maine Department of Agriculture, Conversation, and Forestry. The audit consists of running a list of any outbound order that had DACF allocated inventory on it, comparing that list to returned paperwork, and confirming that said paperwork was signed. For any agency paperwork that cannot be located and/or is not signed, a follow-up email is sent to the specific partner requesting a signature. In June 2023, GSFB staff increased the frequency of auditing from monthly to weekly, allowing a more timely follow-up on any paperwork concerns. The Customer Service and Inventory Management teams share responsibility for auditing and follow-up.
USDA Foods Receipts: Criteria: Evidence of distribution in the form of signed invoices for USDA Foods is required to be maintained for CSFP and TEFAP. Evidence of receipt of USDA foods should be maintained to ensure compliance with the award. Condition: Signed invoices evidencing USDA food distributed were not retained. Context: Our sample of 25 distributions of USDA Foods included two instances where invoices were not properly signed and one instance where the invoice was not retained. Known and likely questioned costs are unknown. Effect: GSFB runs the risk that improper distribution will not be prevented without appropriate document retention. Cause: In all three instances, administrative issues resulted in the untimely lack of retention of signed invoices. Recommendation: We recommend that GSFB reinforce the importance of retaining signed invoices in accordance with award requirements. GSFB should further assign an individual within their organization to assume a higher level of direct responsibility for the administration of federal awards by GSFB. Views of Responsible Officials: GSFB staff audit sales order paperwork in connection with product received from Maine Department of Agriculture, Conversation, and Forestry. The audit consists of running a list of any outbound order that had DACF allocated inventory on it, comparing that list to returned paperwork, and confirming that said paperwork was signed. For any agency paperwork that cannot be located and/or is not signed, a follow-up email is sent to the specific partner requesting a signature. In June 2023, GSFB staff increased the frequency of auditing from monthly to weekly, allowing a more timely follow-up on any paperwork concerns. The Customer Service and Inventory Management teams share responsibility for auditing and follow-up.
Timeliness of Reporting: Criteria: Management was responsible for submitting a timely report based on terms of grant agreement. Condition: During our compliance testing, it was identified that required a Project and Expenditure Report was not submitted timely. Context: The required Project and Expenditure Report was not submitted timely based on terms of grant agreement. Effect: As a result of the condition, GSFB required reporting was not submitted timely based on terms of the grant agreement. Cause: Management has processes and controls over the reporting process, however, these were not updated to reflect the correct due date of the required report per the grant agreement. Recommendation: In the future, GSFB should ensure it implements appropriate processes and controls to ensure a required report is filed timely in accordance with terms of the grant agreement. Views of Responsible Officials: Management acknowledges the finding. During the year under review, Harvesting Good entered into a contract with a grant administrator who now manages all grant reporting. Management is confident that all reports will be submitted in a timely manner for the foreseeable future.
USDA Foods Receipts: Criteria: Evidence of distribution in the form of signed invoices for USDA Foods is required to be maintained for CSFP and TEFAP. Evidence of receipt of USDA foods should be maintained to ensure compliance with the award. Condition: Signed invoices evidencing USDA food distributed were not retained. Context: Our sample of 25 distributions of USDA Foods included two instances where invoices were not properly signed and one instance where the invoice was not retained. Known and likely questioned costs are unknown. Effect: GSFB runs the risk that improper distribution will not be prevented without appropriate document retention. Cause: In all three instances, administrative issues resulted in the untimely lack of retention of signed invoices. Recommendation: We recommend that GSFB reinforce the importance of retaining signed invoices in accordance with award requirements. GSFB should further assign an individual within their organization to assume a higher level of direct responsibility for the administration of federal awards by GSFB. Views of Responsible Officials: GSFB staff audit sales order paperwork in connection with product received from Maine Department of Agriculture, Conversation, and Forestry. The audit consists of running a list of any outbound order that had DACF allocated inventory on it, comparing that list to returned paperwork, and confirming that said paperwork was signed. For any agency paperwork that cannot be located and/or is not signed, a follow-up email is sent to the specific partner requesting a signature. In June 2023, GSFB staff increased the frequency of auditing from monthly to weekly, allowing a more timely follow-up on any paperwork concerns. The Customer Service and Inventory Management teams share responsibility for auditing and follow-up.
USDA Foods Receipts: Criteria: Evidence of distribution in the form of signed invoices for USDA Foods is required to be maintained for CSFP and TEFAP. Evidence of receipt of USDA foods should be maintained to ensure compliance with the award. Condition: Signed invoices evidencing USDA food distributed were not retained. Context: Our sample of 25 distributions of USDA Foods included two instances where invoices were not properly signed and one instance where the invoice was not retained. Known and likely questioned costs are unknown. Effect: GSFB runs the risk that improper distribution will not be prevented without appropriate document retention. Cause: In all three instances, administrative issues resulted in the untimely lack of retention of signed invoices. Recommendation: We recommend that GSFB reinforce the importance of retaining signed invoices in accordance with award requirements. GSFB should further assign an individual within their organization to assume a higher level of direct responsibility for the administration of federal awards by GSFB. Views of Responsible Officials: GSFB staff audit sales order paperwork in connection with product received from Maine Department of Agriculture, Conversation, and Forestry. The audit consists of running a list of any outbound order that had DACF allocated inventory on it, comparing that list to returned paperwork, and confirming that said paperwork was signed. For any agency paperwork that cannot be located and/or is not signed, a follow-up email is sent to the specific partner requesting a signature. In June 2023, GSFB staff increased the frequency of auditing from monthly to weekly, allowing a more timely follow-up on any paperwork concerns. The Customer Service and Inventory Management teams share responsibility for auditing and follow-up.
Timeliness of Reporting: Criteria: Management was responsible for submitting a timely report based on terms of grant agreement. Condition: During our compliance testing, it was identified that required a Project and Expenditure Report was not submitted timely. Context: The required Project and Expenditure Report was not submitted timely based on terms of grant agreement. Effect: As a result of the condition, GSFB required reporting was not submitted timely based on terms of the grant agreement. Cause: Management has processes and controls over the reporting process, however, these were not updated to reflect the correct due date of the required report per the grant agreement. Recommendation: In the future, GSFB should ensure it implements appropriate processes and controls to ensure a required report is filed timely in accordance with terms of the grant agreement. Views of Responsible Officials: Management acknowledges the finding. During the year under review, Harvesting Good entered into a contract with a grant administrator who now manages all grant reporting. Management is confident that all reports will be submitted in a timely manner for the foreseeable future.