Audit 54396

FY End
2022-12-31
Total Expended
$1.93M
Findings
2
Programs
2
Organization: Accord (MN)
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-05-07
Auditor: Mahoney

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
58003 2022-001 Material Weakness Yes E
634445 2022-001 Material Weakness Yes E

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
14.239 Home Investment Partnerships Program $1.52M Yes 1
14.181 Supportive Housing for Persons with Disabilities $25,708 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
ZVQ8C1RAYGR2 Robert Pickering Auditee
6123624420 Elizabeth Barchenger Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Loan/loan guarantee outstanding balances Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting, except for thecapital advance balance as discussed below. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principlescontained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limitedas to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Accord did not elect to use the 10% de minimis cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. Federal expenditures for the HOME Investment Partnership Program and Section 811 program includeloans outstanding from previous years for which the grantor imposes continuing compliancerequirements. The Schedule represents the beginning of the year balance of balances outstanding forprevious years for which the grantor imposes continuing compliance requirements. The balance of theloans outstanding as of December 31, 2022 is as follows:HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM (14.239) - $785,000;SUPPORTIVE HOUSING FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES (Section 811) (14.181) - $381,900.
Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting, except for thecapital advance balance as discussed below. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principlescontained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limitedas to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Accord did not elect to use the 10% de minimis cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal award activity of Accord and related organizations excluding Home Share, HUD Project #092-HD017, as a separate Uniform Guidance audit was performed for this organization, for the year ended December 31, 2022. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and AuditRequirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of Accord, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of Accord.

Finding Details

Department of Housing and Urban Development AL #14.239 - HOME Investment Partnership Program Material Weakness 2022-001 Lack of Review Category of Finding ? Eligibility Condition ? During 2022, Accord did not have controls in place to ensure that eligibility criteria calculations were being reviewed and/or approved by someone other than the individual making the initial determination or annual recertification. Criteria ? The HOME Investment Partnership Program has income targeting requirements. Only low-income or very low-income persons as defined in 24 CFR section 92.2, can receive housing assistance. Therefore, the participating jurisdiction must determine if each family is income eligible by calculating the family's annual income, including all persons in the household. 2 CFR section 200.303 requires that organizations who receive federal awards establish and maintain effective internal controls over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the organization is managing the federal award in compliance with the federal statues, regulations, and terms and conditions of the award. It also states that controls "should" be in compliance with guidance in "standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Comptroller General of the United State (the Green Book) or the "Internal Control Integrated Framework", issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Illustrative specific design and implementation of control activates over eligibility include the following (excerpt from the Green Book): - Proper design of control activities to ensure program compliance should include a process for management to identify and put into effect actions need to carry out specific responses to risks identified in the risk assessment process such as providing benefits to ineligible individuals, calculating amounts to be received for or on behalf of individuals incorrectly, unauthorized changes to system configurations, fraud, unauthorized payments, etc. - Segregations of duties should exist between those determining a participant's eligibility and those reviewing/approving eligibility. Where segregation of duties is not practical, management should select and develop alternative control activities. - Management should establish responsibility and accountability for control activities with management (or other designated personnel) of the unit or function in which the relevant risks reside. Responsible personnel should perform control activities in a timely manner as defined by policies and procedures. Cause ? Due to the limited number of staff employed by the Organization in the Housing department there is a lack of adequate segregation of duties in regard to review of eligibility calculations. Effect ? By not having proper implementation of controls to ensure that certification/recertifications are reviewed and/or approved, there is a risk that individuals are allowed to either enter in the program when they are not eligible, or continue in the program after becoming ineligible. Questioned Costs ? None. Recommendation ? We recommend controls be put in place to ensure the eligibility determinations and rent calculations (initial or recertifications) be reviewed and/or approved by someone other than the individual making the determination. Management?s Response and Corrective Action ? Management agrees with this finding. Beginning in January 2022, management has contracted out the eligibility determination process to a third-party contractor with significant experience in affordable housing and similar processes. Management is working with the contractor to include a second individual in this process so that there will be a review performed by someone other than the individual making the initial determination or annual recertification. Responsible party for corrective action: Robert Pickering, Chief Financial Officer Ernest Johnson, Housing Associate Director Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding. The finding was reported as 2021-001 in 2021.
Department of Housing and Urban Development AL #14.239 - HOME Investment Partnership Program Material Weakness 2022-001 Lack of Review Category of Finding ? Eligibility Condition ? During 2022, Accord did not have controls in place to ensure that eligibility criteria calculations were being reviewed and/or approved by someone other than the individual making the initial determination or annual recertification. Criteria ? The HOME Investment Partnership Program has income targeting requirements. Only low-income or very low-income persons as defined in 24 CFR section 92.2, can receive housing assistance. Therefore, the participating jurisdiction must determine if each family is income eligible by calculating the family's annual income, including all persons in the household. 2 CFR section 200.303 requires that organizations who receive federal awards establish and maintain effective internal controls over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the organization is managing the federal award in compliance with the federal statues, regulations, and terms and conditions of the award. It also states that controls "should" be in compliance with guidance in "standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Comptroller General of the United State (the Green Book) or the "Internal Control Integrated Framework", issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Illustrative specific design and implementation of control activates over eligibility include the following (excerpt from the Green Book): - Proper design of control activities to ensure program compliance should include a process for management to identify and put into effect actions need to carry out specific responses to risks identified in the risk assessment process such as providing benefits to ineligible individuals, calculating amounts to be received for or on behalf of individuals incorrectly, unauthorized changes to system configurations, fraud, unauthorized payments, etc. - Segregations of duties should exist between those determining a participant's eligibility and those reviewing/approving eligibility. Where segregation of duties is not practical, management should select and develop alternative control activities. - Management should establish responsibility and accountability for control activities with management (or other designated personnel) of the unit or function in which the relevant risks reside. Responsible personnel should perform control activities in a timely manner as defined by policies and procedures. Cause ? Due to the limited number of staff employed by the Organization in the Housing department there is a lack of adequate segregation of duties in regard to review of eligibility calculations. Effect ? By not having proper implementation of controls to ensure that certification/recertifications are reviewed and/or approved, there is a risk that individuals are allowed to either enter in the program when they are not eligible, or continue in the program after becoming ineligible. Questioned Costs ? None. Recommendation ? We recommend controls be put in place to ensure the eligibility determinations and rent calculations (initial or recertifications) be reviewed and/or approved by someone other than the individual making the determination. Management?s Response and Corrective Action ? Management agrees with this finding. Beginning in January 2022, management has contracted out the eligibility determination process to a third-party contractor with significant experience in affordable housing and similar processes. Management is working with the contractor to include a second individual in this process so that there will be a review performed by someone other than the individual making the initial determination or annual recertification. Responsible party for corrective action: Robert Pickering, Chief Financial Officer Ernest Johnson, Housing Associate Director Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding. The finding was reported as 2021-001 in 2021.