Audit 53695

FY End
2022-06-30
Total Expended
$1.05M
Findings
8
Programs
9
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-02-22

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
47733 2022-003 Material Weakness - I
47734 2022-003 Material Weakness - I
47735 2022-003 Material Weakness - I
47736 2022-002 Material Weakness - P
624175 2022-003 Material Weakness - I
624176 2022-003 Material Weakness - I
624177 2022-003 Material Weakness - I
624178 2022-002 Material Weakness - P

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
10.555 National School Lunch Program $207,387 Yes 0
84.425 Education Stabilization Fund $122,541 Yes 1
84.027 Special Education Grants to States $110,896 - 0
84.010 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies $107,926 - 0
10.553 School Breakfast Program $93,227 Yes 0
84.358 Rural Education $38,256 - 1
84.173 Special Education Preschool Grants $33,155 - 0
84.367 Supporting Effective Instruction State Grants $28,389 - 0
84.424 Student Support and Academic Enrichment Program $12,619 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
GQ37EPRF6G48 Darin Simpson Auditee
8126487109 Amanda Meko, Cpa, Cgma Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: The School has elected to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance except for federal awards granted by the US Department of Education. The US Department of Education requires a de minimis indirect cost rate of 8-percent. The accompanying schedules of expenditures of federal awards (the "Schedule") includes the federal award activity of the School under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2022. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of the Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Costs Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the School, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of the School.

Finding Details

Finding 2022-003 Identification of federal program: US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 84.425C, 84.425D, and 84.425U Education Stabilization Fund Criteria: Nonfederal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (which still may be referenced as the Davis-Bacon Act) a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contacts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction) (2 CFR section 200.327; Appendix II.D. to 2 CFR Part 200). This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls) (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A-102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215, Appendix A, Contract Provisions); 2 CFR Part 176, Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.327). Condition: An LEA must use ESF funds for minor remodeling, renovation or construction contracts that are over $2,000 and use laborers and mechanics that must meet Davis-Bacon prevailing wage requirements. Cause: The School failed to timely notify a certain contractor about the Davis-Bacon Act contract clause requirements related to the prevailing wage rate for contractors and subcontractors. As a result, the contractor did not provide the certified payrolls or statement of compliance. Potential effect: The contractor may not have complied with the wage requirements. Questioned costs: $214,716.62. Context: A total sample of one (1) item related to a certain contractors HVAC project was selected as a part of allowable cost testing for the Education Stabilization Fund. Recommendation: We recommend that the School provide timely communication related to the prevailing wage rate requirements for contracts with future contractors and subcontractors. The School should also ensure that the proper prevailing wage rate clauses are included in future contracts. We further recommend that the School ensure the contractors and subcontractors compliance with the required federal compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: See attached Corrective Action Plan.
Finding 2022-003 Identification of federal program: US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 84.425C, 84.425D, and 84.425U Education Stabilization Fund Criteria: Nonfederal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (which still may be referenced as the Davis-Bacon Act) a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contacts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction) (2 CFR section 200.327; Appendix II.D. to 2 CFR Part 200). This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls) (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A-102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215, Appendix A, Contract Provisions); 2 CFR Part 176, Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.327). Condition: An LEA must use ESF funds for minor remodeling, renovation or construction contracts that are over $2,000 and use laborers and mechanics that must meet Davis-Bacon prevailing wage requirements. Cause: The School failed to timely notify a certain contractor about the Davis-Bacon Act contract clause requirements related to the prevailing wage rate for contractors and subcontractors. As a result, the contractor did not provide the certified payrolls or statement of compliance. Potential effect: The contractor may not have complied with the wage requirements. Questioned costs: $214,716.62. Context: A total sample of one (1) item related to a certain contractors HVAC project was selected as a part of allowable cost testing for the Education Stabilization Fund. Recommendation: We recommend that the School provide timely communication related to the prevailing wage rate requirements for contracts with future contractors and subcontractors. The School should also ensure that the proper prevailing wage rate clauses are included in future contracts. We further recommend that the School ensure the contractors and subcontractors compliance with the required federal compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: See attached Corrective Action Plan.
Finding 2022-003 Identification of federal program: US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 84.425C, 84.425D, and 84.425U Education Stabilization Fund Criteria: Nonfederal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (which still may be referenced as the Davis-Bacon Act) a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contacts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction) (2 CFR section 200.327; Appendix II.D. to 2 CFR Part 200). This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls) (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A-102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215, Appendix A, Contract Provisions); 2 CFR Part 176, Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.327). Condition: An LEA must use ESF funds for minor remodeling, renovation or construction contracts that are over $2,000 and use laborers and mechanics that must meet Davis-Bacon prevailing wage requirements. Cause: The School failed to timely notify a certain contractor about the Davis-Bacon Act contract clause requirements related to the prevailing wage rate for contractors and subcontractors. As a result, the contractor did not provide the certified payrolls or statement of compliance. Potential effect: The contractor may not have complied with the wage requirements. Questioned costs: $214,716.62. Context: A total sample of one (1) item related to a certain contractors HVAC project was selected as a part of allowable cost testing for the Education Stabilization Fund. Recommendation: We recommend that the School provide timely communication related to the prevailing wage rate requirements for contracts with future contractors and subcontractors. The School should also ensure that the proper prevailing wage rate clauses are included in future contracts. We further recommend that the School ensure the contractors and subcontractors compliance with the required federal compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: See attached Corrective Action Plan.
Finding 2022-002 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 84.358A RURAL EDUCATION GRANT Criteria : According to 2 CFR Subpart F Section 200.510b, the auditee must prepare a Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for the period that includes all amounts spent on federal programs during the reporting period. Finding 2022-002 Condition : The Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) was materially understated by $33,592. Cause : This was the School's first single audit and the first time for the School's accountant to prepare the SEFA. The School does not have a process in place for School Administrative personnel who are familiar with the School's grants to review the SEFA for accuracy and completeness. Effect : An audit adjustment was made to increase the reported amount on the SEFA for the Rural Education Grant (84.358A) by $38,256 and reduce the reported amount on the SEFA for the Special Education Grants (84.027) by $8,288. The increase in expenditures resulted in the need to select a second federal award for testing. Recommendation : We recommend that the School's accountant work with administrative personnel to identify all awards from federal sources and implement a process whereby School administrative personnel review the SEFA prepared by the accountant. In addition, we recommend that the accountant reconcile federal award expenditures to the claims that were filed for the year. View of responsible officials : See attached corrective action plan.
Finding 2022-003 Identification of federal program: US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 84.425C, 84.425D, and 84.425U Education Stabilization Fund Criteria: Nonfederal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (which still may be referenced as the Davis-Bacon Act) a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contacts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction) (2 CFR section 200.327; Appendix II.D. to 2 CFR Part 200). This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls) (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A-102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215, Appendix A, Contract Provisions); 2 CFR Part 176, Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.327). Condition: An LEA must use ESF funds for minor remodeling, renovation or construction contracts that are over $2,000 and use laborers and mechanics that must meet Davis-Bacon prevailing wage requirements. Cause: The School failed to timely notify a certain contractor about the Davis-Bacon Act contract clause requirements related to the prevailing wage rate for contractors and subcontractors. As a result, the contractor did not provide the certified payrolls or statement of compliance. Potential effect: The contractor may not have complied with the wage requirements. Questioned costs: $214,716.62. Context: A total sample of one (1) item related to a certain contractors HVAC project was selected as a part of allowable cost testing for the Education Stabilization Fund. Recommendation: We recommend that the School provide timely communication related to the prevailing wage rate requirements for contracts with future contractors and subcontractors. The School should also ensure that the proper prevailing wage rate clauses are included in future contracts. We further recommend that the School ensure the contractors and subcontractors compliance with the required federal compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: See attached Corrective Action Plan.
Finding 2022-003 Identification of federal program: US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 84.425C, 84.425D, and 84.425U Education Stabilization Fund Criteria: Nonfederal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (which still may be referenced as the Davis-Bacon Act) a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contacts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction) (2 CFR section 200.327; Appendix II.D. to 2 CFR Part 200). This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls) (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A-102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215, Appendix A, Contract Provisions); 2 CFR Part 176, Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.327). Condition: An LEA must use ESF funds for minor remodeling, renovation or construction contracts that are over $2,000 and use laborers and mechanics that must meet Davis-Bacon prevailing wage requirements. Cause: The School failed to timely notify a certain contractor about the Davis-Bacon Act contract clause requirements related to the prevailing wage rate for contractors and subcontractors. As a result, the contractor did not provide the certified payrolls or statement of compliance. Potential effect: The contractor may not have complied with the wage requirements. Questioned costs: $214,716.62. Context: A total sample of one (1) item related to a certain contractors HVAC project was selected as a part of allowable cost testing for the Education Stabilization Fund. Recommendation: We recommend that the School provide timely communication related to the prevailing wage rate requirements for contracts with future contractors and subcontractors. The School should also ensure that the proper prevailing wage rate clauses are included in future contracts. We further recommend that the School ensure the contractors and subcontractors compliance with the required federal compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: See attached Corrective Action Plan.
Finding 2022-003 Identification of federal program: US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 84.425C, 84.425D, and 84.425U Education Stabilization Fund Criteria: Nonfederal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (which still may be referenced as the Davis-Bacon Act) a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contacts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction) (2 CFR section 200.327; Appendix II.D. to 2 CFR Part 200). This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls) (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A-102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215, Appendix A, Contract Provisions); 2 CFR Part 176, Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.327). Condition: An LEA must use ESF funds for minor remodeling, renovation or construction contracts that are over $2,000 and use laborers and mechanics that must meet Davis-Bacon prevailing wage requirements. Cause: The School failed to timely notify a certain contractor about the Davis-Bacon Act contract clause requirements related to the prevailing wage rate for contractors and subcontractors. As a result, the contractor did not provide the certified payrolls or statement of compliance. Potential effect: The contractor may not have complied with the wage requirements. Questioned costs: $214,716.62. Context: A total sample of one (1) item related to a certain contractors HVAC project was selected as a part of allowable cost testing for the Education Stabilization Fund. Recommendation: We recommend that the School provide timely communication related to the prevailing wage rate requirements for contracts with future contractors and subcontractors. The School should also ensure that the proper prevailing wage rate clauses are included in future contracts. We further recommend that the School ensure the contractors and subcontractors compliance with the required federal compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: See attached Corrective Action Plan.
Finding 2022-002 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 84.358A RURAL EDUCATION GRANT Criteria : According to 2 CFR Subpart F Section 200.510b, the auditee must prepare a Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for the period that includes all amounts spent on federal programs during the reporting period. Finding 2022-002 Condition : The Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) was materially understated by $33,592. Cause : This was the School's first single audit and the first time for the School's accountant to prepare the SEFA. The School does not have a process in place for School Administrative personnel who are familiar with the School's grants to review the SEFA for accuracy and completeness. Effect : An audit adjustment was made to increase the reported amount on the SEFA for the Rural Education Grant (84.358A) by $38,256 and reduce the reported amount on the SEFA for the Special Education Grants (84.027) by $8,288. The increase in expenditures resulted in the need to select a second federal award for testing. Recommendation : We recommend that the School's accountant work with administrative personnel to identify all awards from federal sources and implement a process whereby School administrative personnel review the SEFA prepared by the accountant. In addition, we recommend that the accountant reconcile federal award expenditures to the claims that were filed for the year. View of responsible officials : See attached corrective action plan.