Audit 53460

FY End
2022-12-31
Total Expended
$53.89M
Findings
0
Programs
13
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-09-28

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Contacts

Name Title Type
CK4CPHEP2QL7 Mila Fabyanchuk Auditee
3606942501 Hani Morocs Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Federal Loans Accounting Policies: (1) Expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the OMB Circular-A87 and Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement (2) The Authority has not elected to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. The authority was approved by various local jurisdictions to receive pass-through CDBG loans totaling $1,315,670 and $2,969,348. Healthcare Facility Note to build low income housing. The amount listed includes loan proceeds received during the year and the outstanding loan balances from prior years. (1) Community Development Block Grant (City of Vancouver Project 414205) Esther Short Commons - $0. (2) Community Development Block Grant (Clark County Project 0916,09H3) Camas Ridge Apartment - $34,281. (3)Community Development Block Grant (City of Vancouver CDBG-414909) Vista Court Apartment - $81,500. (4) Community Development Block Grant (City of Vancouver CDBG 2015-CDBG-414536) Bridgeview Housing - $150,000. (5) Community Development Block Grant (City of Vancouver CDBG 2015-CDBG-1506) Bridgeview Housing - $100,000. (6) Community Development Block Grant (Clark County NSP) 16703 SE 1st street project - $564,268. (7)Community Development Block Grant (City of Vancouver CDBG) 16703 SE 1st street project - $385,621. (8)Department of Housing and Urban Development Healthcare Facility Note Section 232 (Arbor Ridge) - $2,969,348. TOTAL FEDERAL LOANS - $4,285,018.
Title: PROGRAM COSTS Accounting Policies: (1) Expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the OMB Circular-A87 and Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement (2) The Authority has not elected to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. The amounts shown as current year expenditures represent only federal and state/local grant portions of the program costs. Entire program costs, including the authority's portion may be more than shown.