Audit 52339

FY End
2022-06-30
Total Expended
$317.39M
Findings
4
Programs
7
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-02-16

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
46055 2022-004 Material Weakness - E
46056 2022-004 Material Weakness - E
622497 2022-004 Material Weakness - E
622498 2022-004 Material Weakness - E

Contacts

Name Title Type
SAK7DQJM6LA3 Victor Madamba Auditee
5108741613 Kevin Starkey Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: NOTE 3 ASSISTANCE LISTING NUMBER (ALN) Accounting Policies: NOTE 1 GENERALThe accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal grant activity of the Housing Authority of the City of Oakland, California (the Authority), except for expenditures reported for the California Affordable Housing Initiatives, Inc. (CAHI), a blended component unit. The Authoritys reporting entity is defined in Note 1 of the Authoritys basic financial statements. Federal awards received directly from federal agencies are included in the Schedule. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Authority, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net position or cash flows of the Authority.As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, many new federal programs have been established and funding has been added to existing federal programs. Expenditures funded by any of the following acts are denoted in the Schedule by the prefix COVID-19 in the federal program title.?Coronavirus Preparedness and Response Supplemental Appropriations Act?Families First Coronavirus Response Act?Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act)?Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act (CRRSAA)?American Rescue Pan Act (ARP) De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: NOTE 2 BASIS OF ACCOUNTING Amounts reported in the Schedule represent expenditures incurred for the Authoritys federal award programs, except for the Moving To Work Demonstration (MTW) Program (ALN 14.881), and are reported on the accrual basis of accounting and include capitalized expenditures. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in 2 CFR 200, Subpart E (Cost Principles), wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Given the flexibility of the MTW Program, the housing assistance payment revenue earned from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) provides a better reflection of how HUD has funded the program and such amounts are reported as the Authoritys MTW Program expenditures. The Authority did not elect to use the 10% de minimus cost rate as covered in ?200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. The ALNs included in the accompanying Schedule were determined based on the program name, review of grant contract information, and the General Services Administrations SAM.gov website.
Title: NOTE 4 - RELATIONSHIP TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Accounting Policies: NOTE 1 GENERALThe accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal grant activity of the Housing Authority of the City of Oakland, California (the Authority), except for expenditures reported for the California Affordable Housing Initiatives, Inc. (CAHI), a blended component unit. The Authoritys reporting entity is defined in Note 1 of the Authoritys basic financial statements. Federal awards received directly from federal agencies are included in the Schedule. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Authority, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net position or cash flows of the Authority.As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, many new federal programs have been established and funding has been added to existing federal programs. Expenditures funded by any of the following acts are denoted in the Schedule by the prefix COVID-19 in the federal program title.?Coronavirus Preparedness and Response Supplemental Appropriations Act?Families First Coronavirus Response Act?Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act)?Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act (CRRSAA)?American Rescue Pan Act (ARP) De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: NOTE 2 BASIS OF ACCOUNTING Amounts reported in the Schedule represent expenditures incurred for the Authoritys federal award programs, except for the Moving To Work Demonstration (MTW) Program (ALN 14.881), and are reported on the accrual basis of accounting and include capitalized expenditures. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in 2 CFR 200, Subpart E (Cost Principles), wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Given the flexibility of the MTW Program, the housing assistance payment revenue earned from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) provides a better reflection of how HUD has funded the program and such amounts are reported as the Authoritys MTW Program expenditures. The Authority did not elect to use the 10% de minimus cost rate as covered in ?200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. The Schedule agrees to or can be reconciled with the amounts reported in the Authoritys basic financial statements.
Title: NOTE 5 CALIFORNIA AFFORDABLE HOUSING INITIATIVES, INC. (CAHI) FEDER Accounting Policies: NOTE 1 GENERALThe accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal grant activity of the Housing Authority of the City of Oakland, California (the Authority), except for expenditures reported for the California Affordable Housing Initiatives, Inc. (CAHI), a blended component unit. The Authoritys reporting entity is defined in Note 1 of the Authoritys basic financial statements. Federal awards received directly from federal agencies are included in the Schedule. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Authority, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net position or cash flows of the Authority.As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, many new federal programs have been established and funding has been added to existing federal programs. Expenditures funded by any of the following acts are denoted in the Schedule by the prefix COVID-19 in the federal program title.?Coronavirus Preparedness and Response Supplemental Appropriations Act?Families First Coronavirus Response Act?Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act)?Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act (CRRSAA)?American Rescue Pan Act (ARP) De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: NOTE 2 BASIS OF ACCOUNTING Amounts reported in the Schedule represent expenditures incurred for the Authoritys federal award programs, except for the Moving To Work Demonstration (MTW) Program (ALN 14.881), and are reported on the accrual basis of accounting and include capitalized expenditures. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in 2 CFR 200, Subpart E (Cost Principles), wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Given the flexibility of the MTW Program, the housing assistance payment revenue earned from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) provides a better reflection of how HUD has funded the program and such amounts are reported as the Authoritys MTW Program expenditures. The Authority did not elect to use the 10% de minimus cost rate as covered in ?200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. Federal expenditures incurred by CAHI are excluded from the Schedule because CAHIs federal expenditures are separately audited. Expenditures for CAHIs federal award program from the separately issued single audit report, is listed below: Section 8 Housing Assistance Payments Program ALN(14.195) $777,310,000

Finding Details

Reference Number: 2022-004 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Title: Section 8 Moving to Work Demonstration Program Assistance Listing Number: 14.881 Federal Grant Number: Not Applicable Category of Finding: Eligibility Classification of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Instance of Noncompliance Criteria Pursuant to the following: Title 2 - Grants and Agreements. Subtitle A - Office of Management and Budget Guidance for Grants and Agreements. Chapter II - Office of Management and Budget Guidance. Part 200 - Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. Subpart D - Post Federal Award Requirements. Standards for Financial and Program Management. ?200.303 Internal controls (2 CFR 200.303): The non-Federal entity must - Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework?, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Title 24 ? Housing and Urban Development. Subtitle B - Chapter IX ? Admission to, and Occupancy of, Public Housing. Subpart A ? Applicability, Definitions, Equal Opportunity Requirements ? Section 960.201 ? Eligibility: (1) Basic eligibility. An applicant must meet all eligibility requirements in order to receive housing assistance. At a minimum, the applicant must be a family, and must be income-eligible, as described in this section. Such eligible applicants include single persons. (2) Low income limit. No family other than a low income family is eligible for admission to a Public Housing Authority's (PHA) public housing program. Title 24 ? Housing and Urban Development. Subtitle B - Chapter IX ? Admission to, and Occupancy of, Public Housing. Subpart C ? Rent and Reexamination ? Sections 960.257 and 960.259 ? Family information and verification: (1) For families who pay an income-based rent, the PHA must conduct a reexamination of family income and composition at least annually and must make appropriate adjustments in the rent after consultation with the family and upon verification of the information. The PHA must obtain and document in the family file third-party verification of the following factors, or must document in the file why third-party verification was not available: (1) Reported family annual income; (2) The value of assets; (3) Expenses related to deductions from annual income; and (4) Other factors that affect the determination of adjusted income or income-based rent. Condition and Context During our testing of the eligibility compliance requirements for the Moving to Work (MTW) Demonstration Program (Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers (HCV) and Low Rent Public Housing (LRPH) programs), we selected tenants from a population of 13,107 HCV tenant cases and 1,454 LRPH tenant cases and identified the following exceptions: HCV (a total of 40 tenant cases selected for testing): ? In four cases, required documentation to establish initial eligibility was missing from the files. The missing documents include copies of social security numbers and evidence of citizenship or eligible immigration status. LRPH (a total of 40 tenant cases selected for testing): ? In nine cases, annual reexaminations that were due were not performed within the required timeframe. ? In four cases, third party evidence supporting the verification of income was missing from the file. ? For nine cases, various documents were missing from the file as evidence to support the initial and recertification of eligibility, including background documents and income Authorization for Release Forms. Cause We noted that the Authority did not have adequate resources assigned to ensure that applicant?s eligibility was properly reviewed and approved prior to acceptance and/or continuance in the Moving to Work Demonstration Program. Effect When the necessary oversight and monitoring of eligibility determinations or recertification is insufficient, the Authority has an increase risk of ineligible participation in the program and individuals receiving improper benefits. Questioned Costs Questioned costs were not identified as the tenants were deemed eligible for the HCV and LRPH programs. Recommendation The Authority should adhere and monitor compliance with its policies to ensure staff and secondary reviews of eligibility applications are performed, while following established guidelines and retaining acceptable documentation to support the eligibility determinations and subsequent recertification. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan Management's response is reported in "Management's Response and Corrective Action Plan" included in a separate section at the end of this report.
Reference Number: 2022-004 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Title: Section 8 Moving to Work Demonstration Program Assistance Listing Number: 14.881 Federal Grant Number: Not Applicable Category of Finding: Eligibility Classification of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Instance of Noncompliance Criteria Pursuant to the following: Title 2 - Grants and Agreements. Subtitle A - Office of Management and Budget Guidance for Grants and Agreements. Chapter II - Office of Management and Budget Guidance. Part 200 - Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. Subpart D - Post Federal Award Requirements. Standards for Financial and Program Management. ?200.303 Internal controls (2 CFR 200.303): The non-Federal entity must - Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework?, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Title 24 ? Housing and Urban Development. Subtitle B - Chapter IX ? Admission to, and Occupancy of, Public Housing. Subpart A ? Applicability, Definitions, Equal Opportunity Requirements ? Section 960.201 ? Eligibility: (1) Basic eligibility. An applicant must meet all eligibility requirements in order to receive housing assistance. At a minimum, the applicant must be a family, and must be income-eligible, as described in this section. Such eligible applicants include single persons. (2) Low income limit. No family other than a low income family is eligible for admission to a Public Housing Authority's (PHA) public housing program. Title 24 ? Housing and Urban Development. Subtitle B - Chapter IX ? Admission to, and Occupancy of, Public Housing. Subpart C ? Rent and Reexamination ? Sections 960.257 and 960.259 ? Family information and verification: (1) For families who pay an income-based rent, the PHA must conduct a reexamination of family income and composition at least annually and must make appropriate adjustments in the rent after consultation with the family and upon verification of the information. The PHA must obtain and document in the family file third-party verification of the following factors, or must document in the file why third-party verification was not available: (1) Reported family annual income; (2) The value of assets; (3) Expenses related to deductions from annual income; and (4) Other factors that affect the determination of adjusted income or income-based rent. Condition and Context During our testing of the eligibility compliance requirements for the Moving to Work (MTW) Demonstration Program (Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers (HCV) and Low Rent Public Housing (LRPH) programs), we selected tenants from a population of 13,107 HCV tenant cases and 1,454 LRPH tenant cases and identified the following exceptions: HCV (a total of 40 tenant cases selected for testing): ? In four cases, required documentation to establish initial eligibility was missing from the files. The missing documents include copies of social security numbers and evidence of citizenship or eligible immigration status. LRPH (a total of 40 tenant cases selected for testing): ? In nine cases, annual reexaminations that were due were not performed within the required timeframe. ? In four cases, third party evidence supporting the verification of income was missing from the file. ? For nine cases, various documents were missing from the file as evidence to support the initial and recertification of eligibility, including background documents and income Authorization for Release Forms. Cause We noted that the Authority did not have adequate resources assigned to ensure that applicant?s eligibility was properly reviewed and approved prior to acceptance and/or continuance in the Moving to Work Demonstration Program. Effect When the necessary oversight and monitoring of eligibility determinations or recertification is insufficient, the Authority has an increase risk of ineligible participation in the program and individuals receiving improper benefits. Questioned Costs Questioned costs were not identified as the tenants were deemed eligible for the HCV and LRPH programs. Recommendation The Authority should adhere and monitor compliance with its policies to ensure staff and secondary reviews of eligibility applications are performed, while following established guidelines and retaining acceptable documentation to support the eligibility determinations and subsequent recertification. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan Management's response is reported in "Management's Response and Corrective Action Plan" included in a separate section at the end of this report.
Reference Number: 2022-004 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Title: Section 8 Moving to Work Demonstration Program Assistance Listing Number: 14.881 Federal Grant Number: Not Applicable Category of Finding: Eligibility Classification of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Instance of Noncompliance Criteria Pursuant to the following: Title 2 - Grants and Agreements. Subtitle A - Office of Management and Budget Guidance for Grants and Agreements. Chapter II - Office of Management and Budget Guidance. Part 200 - Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. Subpart D - Post Federal Award Requirements. Standards for Financial and Program Management. ?200.303 Internal controls (2 CFR 200.303): The non-Federal entity must - Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework?, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Title 24 ? Housing and Urban Development. Subtitle B - Chapter IX ? Admission to, and Occupancy of, Public Housing. Subpart A ? Applicability, Definitions, Equal Opportunity Requirements ? Section 960.201 ? Eligibility: (1) Basic eligibility. An applicant must meet all eligibility requirements in order to receive housing assistance. At a minimum, the applicant must be a family, and must be income-eligible, as described in this section. Such eligible applicants include single persons. (2) Low income limit. No family other than a low income family is eligible for admission to a Public Housing Authority's (PHA) public housing program. Title 24 ? Housing and Urban Development. Subtitle B - Chapter IX ? Admission to, and Occupancy of, Public Housing. Subpart C ? Rent and Reexamination ? Sections 960.257 and 960.259 ? Family information and verification: (1) For families who pay an income-based rent, the PHA must conduct a reexamination of family income and composition at least annually and must make appropriate adjustments in the rent after consultation with the family and upon verification of the information. The PHA must obtain and document in the family file third-party verification of the following factors, or must document in the file why third-party verification was not available: (1) Reported family annual income; (2) The value of assets; (3) Expenses related to deductions from annual income; and (4) Other factors that affect the determination of adjusted income or income-based rent. Condition and Context During our testing of the eligibility compliance requirements for the Moving to Work (MTW) Demonstration Program (Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers (HCV) and Low Rent Public Housing (LRPH) programs), we selected tenants from a population of 13,107 HCV tenant cases and 1,454 LRPH tenant cases and identified the following exceptions: HCV (a total of 40 tenant cases selected for testing): ? In four cases, required documentation to establish initial eligibility was missing from the files. The missing documents include copies of social security numbers and evidence of citizenship or eligible immigration status. LRPH (a total of 40 tenant cases selected for testing): ? In nine cases, annual reexaminations that were due were not performed within the required timeframe. ? In four cases, third party evidence supporting the verification of income was missing from the file. ? For nine cases, various documents were missing from the file as evidence to support the initial and recertification of eligibility, including background documents and income Authorization for Release Forms. Cause We noted that the Authority did not have adequate resources assigned to ensure that applicant?s eligibility was properly reviewed and approved prior to acceptance and/or continuance in the Moving to Work Demonstration Program. Effect When the necessary oversight and monitoring of eligibility determinations or recertification is insufficient, the Authority has an increase risk of ineligible participation in the program and individuals receiving improper benefits. Questioned Costs Questioned costs were not identified as the tenants were deemed eligible for the HCV and LRPH programs. Recommendation The Authority should adhere and monitor compliance with its policies to ensure staff and secondary reviews of eligibility applications are performed, while following established guidelines and retaining acceptable documentation to support the eligibility determinations and subsequent recertification. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan Management's response is reported in "Management's Response and Corrective Action Plan" included in a separate section at the end of this report.
Reference Number: 2022-004 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Title: Section 8 Moving to Work Demonstration Program Assistance Listing Number: 14.881 Federal Grant Number: Not Applicable Category of Finding: Eligibility Classification of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Instance of Noncompliance Criteria Pursuant to the following: Title 2 - Grants and Agreements. Subtitle A - Office of Management and Budget Guidance for Grants and Agreements. Chapter II - Office of Management and Budget Guidance. Part 200 - Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. Subpart D - Post Federal Award Requirements. Standards for Financial and Program Management. ?200.303 Internal controls (2 CFR 200.303): The non-Federal entity must - Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework?, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Title 24 ? Housing and Urban Development. Subtitle B - Chapter IX ? Admission to, and Occupancy of, Public Housing. Subpart A ? Applicability, Definitions, Equal Opportunity Requirements ? Section 960.201 ? Eligibility: (1) Basic eligibility. An applicant must meet all eligibility requirements in order to receive housing assistance. At a minimum, the applicant must be a family, and must be income-eligible, as described in this section. Such eligible applicants include single persons. (2) Low income limit. No family other than a low income family is eligible for admission to a Public Housing Authority's (PHA) public housing program. Title 24 ? Housing and Urban Development. Subtitle B - Chapter IX ? Admission to, and Occupancy of, Public Housing. Subpart C ? Rent and Reexamination ? Sections 960.257 and 960.259 ? Family information and verification: (1) For families who pay an income-based rent, the PHA must conduct a reexamination of family income and composition at least annually and must make appropriate adjustments in the rent after consultation with the family and upon verification of the information. The PHA must obtain and document in the family file third-party verification of the following factors, or must document in the file why third-party verification was not available: (1) Reported family annual income; (2) The value of assets; (3) Expenses related to deductions from annual income; and (4) Other factors that affect the determination of adjusted income or income-based rent. Condition and Context During our testing of the eligibility compliance requirements for the Moving to Work (MTW) Demonstration Program (Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers (HCV) and Low Rent Public Housing (LRPH) programs), we selected tenants from a population of 13,107 HCV tenant cases and 1,454 LRPH tenant cases and identified the following exceptions: HCV (a total of 40 tenant cases selected for testing): ? In four cases, required documentation to establish initial eligibility was missing from the files. The missing documents include copies of social security numbers and evidence of citizenship or eligible immigration status. LRPH (a total of 40 tenant cases selected for testing): ? In nine cases, annual reexaminations that were due were not performed within the required timeframe. ? In four cases, third party evidence supporting the verification of income was missing from the file. ? For nine cases, various documents were missing from the file as evidence to support the initial and recertification of eligibility, including background documents and income Authorization for Release Forms. Cause We noted that the Authority did not have adequate resources assigned to ensure that applicant?s eligibility was properly reviewed and approved prior to acceptance and/or continuance in the Moving to Work Demonstration Program. Effect When the necessary oversight and monitoring of eligibility determinations or recertification is insufficient, the Authority has an increase risk of ineligible participation in the program and individuals receiving improper benefits. Questioned Costs Questioned costs were not identified as the tenants were deemed eligible for the HCV and LRPH programs. Recommendation The Authority should adhere and monitor compliance with its policies to ensure staff and secondary reviews of eligibility applications are performed, while following established guidelines and retaining acceptable documentation to support the eligibility determinations and subsequent recertification. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan Management's response is reported in "Management's Response and Corrective Action Plan" included in a separate section at the end of this report.