Audit 52320

FY End
2022-01-31
Total Expended
$4.18M
Findings
2
Programs
10
Organization: Cedar County Memorial Hospital (MO)
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2022-10-30

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Contacts

Name Title Type
C672XBQBLW48 Carla Gilbert Auditee
4178763097 Joshua Wilks Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Accounting Policies: The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards includes the federal grant activity of Cedar County Memorial Hospitals (the Hospital) and is presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the applicable requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the schedule of expenditures of federal awards presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Hospital, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net position, or cash flows of the Hospital. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: The auditee used the de minimis cost rate. No funds were identified as having been provided to subrecipients by the Hospital and accordingly, no funds identified in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards are attributable to subrecipient entities. There were no federal awards expended for noncash assistance or insurance. The Hospital has elected to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowable under the Uniform Guidance.
Title: RECONCILATION OF SEFA AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Accounting Policies: The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards includes the federal grant activity of Cedar County Memorial Hospitals (the Hospital) and is presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the applicable requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the schedule of expenditures of federal awards presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Hospital, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net position, or cash flows of the Hospital. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: The auditee used the de minimis cost rate. The financial statements reflect revenue recognized from the Provider Relief Fund (PRF) of approximately $3,000,000 and $221,000 for the years ended January 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The SEFA includes Provider Relief Funds of $3,678,410 that were received in Period 1 in accordance with the requirements of the compliance supplement for assistance listing number 93.498.

Finding Details

2022?001 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Other Programs Federal program title: Provider Relief Funding CFDA Number: 93.498 Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: Period 1 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matters Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs Criteria or specific requirement: Surrounding reporting activities, the Hospital?s internal controls should be designed to assure all reporting completed under program guidelines. Condition: During our testing, we identified the Hospital did not have internal controls and documentation procedures in place to ensure reporting was completed in accordance with HHS guidelines. Questioned costs: None Context: During our testing, it was identified that the Hospital reported approximately $1.2 Million in contracted emergency room physician costs, however at the time they did not specifically document how these costs were necessary to respond to Covid-19. Cause: The Hospital was amidst a pandemic and failed to document the rationale at the time of incurring the costs. Effect: The auditor noted no instances of noncompliance with the costs incurred; however, the internal controls around compliance over reporting were not effective. Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: We recommend the Hospital design controls to ensure documentation is completed timely and sufficiently on how costs are necessary to respond to Covid-19. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Management identified that given the changing guidance (incremental vs. non-incremental) and being in the midst of pandemic created uncertainty in the documentation requirements around the use of the funds. In addition, management believes there is approximately $374,000 of lost revenues that were inadvertently not included in the report.
2022?001 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Other Programs Federal program title: Provider Relief Funding CFDA Number: 93.498 Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: Period 1 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matters Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs Criteria or specific requirement: Surrounding reporting activities, the Hospital?s internal controls should be designed to assure all reporting completed under program guidelines. Condition: During our testing, we identified the Hospital did not have internal controls and documentation procedures in place to ensure reporting was completed in accordance with HHS guidelines. Questioned costs: None Context: During our testing, it was identified that the Hospital reported approximately $1.2 Million in contracted emergency room physician costs, however at the time they did not specifically document how these costs were necessary to respond to Covid-19. Cause: The Hospital was amidst a pandemic and failed to document the rationale at the time of incurring the costs. Effect: The auditor noted no instances of noncompliance with the costs incurred; however, the internal controls around compliance over reporting were not effective. Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: We recommend the Hospital design controls to ensure documentation is completed timely and sufficiently on how costs are necessary to respond to Covid-19. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Management identified that given the changing guidance (incremental vs. non-incremental) and being in the midst of pandemic created uncertainty in the documentation requirements around the use of the funds. In addition, management believes there is approximately $374,000 of lost revenues that were inadvertently not included in the report.