Audit 5228

FY End
2023-06-30
Total Expended
$6.37M
Findings
6
Programs
11
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2023-12-04
Auditor: Forvis LLP

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Contacts

Name Title Type
QJ2WLMZJ7MK5 Vadette Fowler Auditee
9077437321 Justin Kensinger Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule, if any, represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Anchorage Neighborhood Health Center, Inc. has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the “Schedule”) includes the federal award activity of Anchorage Neighborhood Health Center, Inc. under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2023. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of Anchorage Neighborhood Health Center, Inc., it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, results of operations, changes in net assets, or cash flows of Anchorage Neighborhood Health Center, Inc.
Title: Federal Loan Program Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule, if any, represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Anchorage Neighborhood Health Center, Inc. has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. Anchorage Neighborhood Health Center, Inc. did not have any federal loan programs during the year ended June 30, 2023.
Title: Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) (Unaudited) Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule, if any, represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Anchorage Neighborhood Health Center, Inc. has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. Anchorage Neighborhood Health Center, Inc. did not receive donated Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) from federal sources during the year ended June 30, 2023.

Finding Details

Health Center Program Cluster Assistance Listing Numbers 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Criteria or Specific Requirement – Special Tests and Provisions: Sliding Fee Discounts (42 USC 254(k)(3)(g); 42 CFR sections 51c.303(g); and 42 CFR sections 56.303 (f)) Condition – Patients received a sliding fee discount that was inconsistent with the stated sliding fee discount categories under the Organization’s policy. Questioned cost – None Context – A sample of 25 patients were tested out of the total population of 54,221 encounters. The sampling methodology used is not and is not intended to be statistically valid. Two patients received a sliding fee adjustment that was inconsistent with the approved policy for the proper sliding fee adjustments based on their income documentation. Effect – Sliding fee discounts were given to patients that were inconsistent with the Organization’s sliding fee discount policy. Cause – The Organization did not comply with their sliding fee policy. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – Is not a repeat finding. Recommendation – We recommend management continue to ensure all personnel understand the sliding fee scale policy and adhere to the requirements and guidelines set forth in the policy. Procedures should be implemented to ensure that eligible patients receive discounts in accordance with the sliding fee scale and the Health Center Program Compliance Manual.
Health Center Program Cluster Assistance Listing Numbers 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Criteria or Specific Requirement – Special Tests and Provisions: Sliding Fee Discounts (42 USC 254(k)(3)(g); 42 CFR sections 51c.303(g); and 42 CFR sections 56.303 (f)) Condition – Patients received a sliding fee discount that was inconsistent with the stated sliding fee discount categories under the Organization’s policy. Questioned cost – None Context – A sample of 25 patients were tested out of the total population of 54,221 encounters. The sampling methodology used is not and is not intended to be statistically valid. Two patients received a sliding fee adjustment that was inconsistent with the approved policy for the proper sliding fee adjustments based on their income documentation. Effect – Sliding fee discounts were given to patients that were inconsistent with the Organization’s sliding fee discount policy. Cause – The Organization did not comply with their sliding fee policy. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – Is not a repeat finding. Recommendation – We recommend management continue to ensure all personnel understand the sliding fee scale policy and adhere to the requirements and guidelines set forth in the policy. Procedures should be implemented to ensure that eligible patients receive discounts in accordance with the sliding fee scale and the Health Center Program Compliance Manual.
Health Center Program Cluster Assistance Listing Numbers 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Criteria or Specific Requirement – Special Tests and Provisions: Sliding Fee Discounts (42 USC 254(k)(3)(g); 42 CFR sections 51c.303(g); and 42 CFR sections 56.303 (f)) Condition – Patients received a sliding fee discount that was inconsistent with the stated sliding fee discount categories under the Organization’s policy. Questioned cost – None Context – A sample of 25 patients were tested out of the total population of 54,221 encounters. The sampling methodology used is not and is not intended to be statistically valid. Two patients received a sliding fee adjustment that was inconsistent with the approved policy for the proper sliding fee adjustments based on their income documentation. Effect – Sliding fee discounts were given to patients that were inconsistent with the Organization’s sliding fee discount policy. Cause – The Organization did not comply with their sliding fee policy. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – Is not a repeat finding. Recommendation – We recommend management continue to ensure all personnel understand the sliding fee scale policy and adhere to the requirements and guidelines set forth in the policy. Procedures should be implemented to ensure that eligible patients receive discounts in accordance with the sliding fee scale and the Health Center Program Compliance Manual.
Health Center Program Cluster Assistance Listing Numbers 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Criteria or Specific Requirement – Special Tests and Provisions: Sliding Fee Discounts (42 USC 254(k)(3)(g); 42 CFR sections 51c.303(g); and 42 CFR sections 56.303 (f)) Condition – Patients received a sliding fee discount that was inconsistent with the stated sliding fee discount categories under the Organization’s policy. Questioned cost – None Context – A sample of 25 patients were tested out of the total population of 54,221 encounters. The sampling methodology used is not and is not intended to be statistically valid. Two patients received a sliding fee adjustment that was inconsistent with the approved policy for the proper sliding fee adjustments based on their income documentation. Effect – Sliding fee discounts were given to patients that were inconsistent with the Organization’s sliding fee discount policy. Cause – The Organization did not comply with their sliding fee policy. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – Is not a repeat finding. Recommendation – We recommend management continue to ensure all personnel understand the sliding fee scale policy and adhere to the requirements and guidelines set forth in the policy. Procedures should be implemented to ensure that eligible patients receive discounts in accordance with the sliding fee scale and the Health Center Program Compliance Manual.
Health Center Program Cluster Assistance Listing Numbers 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Criteria or Specific Requirement – Special Tests and Provisions: Sliding Fee Discounts (42 USC 254(k)(3)(g); 42 CFR sections 51c.303(g); and 42 CFR sections 56.303 (f)) Condition – Patients received a sliding fee discount that was inconsistent with the stated sliding fee discount categories under the Organization’s policy. Questioned cost – None Context – A sample of 25 patients were tested out of the total population of 54,221 encounters. The sampling methodology used is not and is not intended to be statistically valid. Two patients received a sliding fee adjustment that was inconsistent with the approved policy for the proper sliding fee adjustments based on their income documentation. Effect – Sliding fee discounts were given to patients that were inconsistent with the Organization’s sliding fee discount policy. Cause – The Organization did not comply with their sliding fee policy. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – Is not a repeat finding. Recommendation – We recommend management continue to ensure all personnel understand the sliding fee scale policy and adhere to the requirements and guidelines set forth in the policy. Procedures should be implemented to ensure that eligible patients receive discounts in accordance with the sliding fee scale and the Health Center Program Compliance Manual.
Health Center Program Cluster Assistance Listing Numbers 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Criteria or Specific Requirement – Special Tests and Provisions: Sliding Fee Discounts (42 USC 254(k)(3)(g); 42 CFR sections 51c.303(g); and 42 CFR sections 56.303 (f)) Condition – Patients received a sliding fee discount that was inconsistent with the stated sliding fee discount categories under the Organization’s policy. Questioned cost – None Context – A sample of 25 patients were tested out of the total population of 54,221 encounters. The sampling methodology used is not and is not intended to be statistically valid. Two patients received a sliding fee adjustment that was inconsistent with the approved policy for the proper sliding fee adjustments based on their income documentation. Effect – Sliding fee discounts were given to patients that were inconsistent with the Organization’s sliding fee discount policy. Cause – The Organization did not comply with their sliding fee policy. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – Is not a repeat finding. Recommendation – We recommend management continue to ensure all personnel understand the sliding fee scale policy and adhere to the requirements and guidelines set forth in the policy. Procedures should be implemented to ensure that eligible patients receive discounts in accordance with the sliding fee scale and the Health Center Program Compliance Manual.