Audit 52054

FY End
2022-12-31
Total Expended
$985,000
Findings
2
Programs
2
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-05-31
Auditor: Ritz Holman LLP

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
46705 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - E
623147 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - E

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $880,000 Yes 1
21.020 Community Development Financial Institutions Program $42,000 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
CSLZF6GKKP78 Michael Gosman Auditee
4149332215 Renee Messing Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal and state awards, as required by Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) and in accordance with the State Single Audit Guidelines, is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is also not a required part of the financial statements. Such information is the responsibility of management and was derived from and relates directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the financial statements. The information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the financial statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the financial statements or to the financial statements themselves, and other additional procedures in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. In our opinion, the information is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the financial statements as a whole. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate.

Finding Details

1) Federal program and specific federal award Identification: CFDA # 21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds 2) Criteria: The City of Milwaukee contract for Down Payment Assistance has specific required documents that are to be retained in each participant?s file. 3) Condition: During testing of randomly selected files, one file was missing residency documentation and two files were missing required documentation supporting participant income. 4) Cause: Required documentation was not located in the files for the participants. 5) Effect: Files are not in compliance with the requirements of City of Milwaukee. In certain cases, where documentation of income or residency were missing this could affect the eligibility of the participant in the program. 6) Questioned costs: No questioned costs were identified. 7) Prevalence or consequence: Out of thirteen files tested for the City of Milwaukee, three were missing the required information. 8) Repeated audit finding: Not applicable. 9) Recommendation to prevent future occurrences: We recommend that the Organization establish a checklist of required items. We recommend that periodically, the Organization conduct an internal review of files to ensure all documents have been retained in accordance with the checklist. 10) Views of responsible officials at auditee: We agree with the finding of the auditor. During 2022, the organization experienced a significant increase in grant activity and certain personnel changes. We believe that all required documentation was obtained, we were unable to locate these documents. We have implemented a final file review process to ensure that all documents are filed in the appropriate participant files.
1) Federal program and specific federal award Identification: CFDA # 21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds 2) Criteria: The City of Milwaukee contract for Down Payment Assistance has specific required documents that are to be retained in each participant?s file. 3) Condition: During testing of randomly selected files, one file was missing residency documentation and two files were missing required documentation supporting participant income. 4) Cause: Required documentation was not located in the files for the participants. 5) Effect: Files are not in compliance with the requirements of City of Milwaukee. In certain cases, where documentation of income or residency were missing this could affect the eligibility of the participant in the program. 6) Questioned costs: No questioned costs were identified. 7) Prevalence or consequence: Out of thirteen files tested for the City of Milwaukee, three were missing the required information. 8) Repeated audit finding: Not applicable. 9) Recommendation to prevent future occurrences: We recommend that the Organization establish a checklist of required items. We recommend that periodically, the Organization conduct an internal review of files to ensure all documents have been retained in accordance with the checklist. 10) Views of responsible officials at auditee: We agree with the finding of the auditor. During 2022, the organization experienced a significant increase in grant activity and certain personnel changes. We believe that all required documentation was obtained, we were unable to locate these documents. We have implemented a final file review process to ensure that all documents are filed in the appropriate participant files.