Audit 51401

FY End
2022-06-30
Total Expended
$1.07M
Findings
0
Programs
10
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-03-30
Auditor: Drs CPA PLLC

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

No findings recorded

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
84.425 Education Stabilization Fund $470,399 Yes 0
84.010 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies $124,948 - 0
10.559 Summer Food Service Program for Children $116,641 - 0
10.665 Schools and Roads - Grants to States $65,630 - 0
84.358 Rural Education $25,950 - 0
10.555 National School Lunch Program $19,726 - 0
84.367 Improving Teacher Quality State Grants $19,039 - 0
84.424 Student Support and Academic Enrichment Program $14,293 - 0
84.027 Special Education_grants to States $10,886 - 0
10.542 Pandemic Ebt Food Benefits $614 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
K5GJFJH2UKC4 Denisse Melendez Auditee
5202870734 Dallas Siler Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) includes the Santa CruzElementary School District No. 28's (the District) federal grant activity under federal programs for theyear ended June 30, 2022. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with therequirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform AdministrativeRequirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance).Expenditures reported on the schedule are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Suchexpenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, whereincertain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Therefore, someamounts presented in this schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of,the financial statements. Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of theSchool, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position or changes in fund balance or netposition of the District. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate.