Criteria or Specific Requirement
2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards requires compliance with the provisions of procurement and suspension and debarment. The Organization should have internal controls designed to ensure compliance with these provisions.
Condition and Context
During our testing over suspension and debarment, we noted the three instances in which the Organization did not perform the suspension and debarment check prior to entering into a transaction with a vendor.
Effect
The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance could result in possible federal funds being provided to ineligible vendors.
Questioned Costs
None identified.
Cause
The Organization lacks established internal controls and procedures over financial grant management. The Organization did not perform the suspension and debarment check prior to entering into the transactions.
Recommendation
We recommend the Organization implement a process to ensure suspension and debarment checks are performed and documentation to show that the checks are occurring prior to entering into transactions with vendors.
Views of Responsible Officials
Suspension and Debarment checks were occurring prior to a transaction with a new vendor; however, the checks were not saved. Any new vendor will have a check, and if we check them manually, we will begin to save these checks as documentation. We also implemented Compliatrics early in 2022 where we can enter our vendors into this system to do an auto check every month. It will flag us when a vendor is on the exclusion listing. Dell and NCHA were checked prior to transactions being entered into, but the documentation was not saved. These two vendors began being checked monthly through Compliatrics starting February 1, 2022. Amazon has now been entered into Compliatrics and is being checked monthly. Amazon was checked prior to using them as a vendor, but the documentation was not saved. As of June 8, 2023, Amazon is not on the exclusion list. We have begun to enter all vendors we utilize into this system.
Criteria or Specific Requirement
2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of procurement and suspension and debarment. The Organization should have internal controls designed to ensure compliance with these provisions.
Condition and Context
We noted the Organization is not in compliance with requirements related to Procurement, Suspension and Debarment. During our testing, we noted the following exceptions:
• SCH The Organization’s procurement policy did not meet the requirements defined by
2 CFR 200.
• The Organization did not retain support to document the procurement methods followed (I.e., sole source, small purchases, sealed bids, proposals, etc.).
Effect
The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in possible federal funds provided to ineligible subrecipients and/or vendors.
Questioned Costs
None identified.
Cause
The Organization lacks a uniform Procurement, Suspension & Debarment policy that is in compliance with the Federal regulations and/or the terms and conditions of the Federal award.
Recommendation
• We recommend the Organization review and update its procurement policy to ensure the policy meets the 2 CFR Part 200 Procurement requirements.
• We recommend the Organization retain all documentation and support to show that the procurement policy was followed.
Views of Responsible Officials
The Organization will be reviewing and updating our procurement policy for any missing items not currently noted in our policies or procedures. Gateway and RC Telecom are our sole-source vendors based on the scope and nature of the work and our unique phone system set up. However, no documentation was recorded or kept for this vendor, besides quotes prior to purchases as well as purchase orders per our current purchasing procedure. Our current policy does mention competitive bidding, and the procedure mentions sole-source documentation and what we use for this documentation (currently a bid or quotation), but we need to expand and not just reference the CFR, but at minimum list our thresholds for procurement methods and other required elements. When we meet the bidding threshold, sealed bids are kept in our files. We have not had any sealed bid purchases in fiscal year 2023.
Criteria or Specific Requirement
Per Title 42 Chapter 1 Subchapter D Section 51c303(f), “Health centers must have a schedule of fees or payments for the provision of their health services consistent with locally prevailing rates or charges designed to cover their reasonable costs of operation. They are also required to have a corresponding schedule of discounts applied and adjusted on the basis of the patient’s ability to pay.”
Condition and Context
During our testing of forty sliding fee discounts for health center patients qualifying for reduced charge visits, we identified two visits that received the incorrect sliding fee discount.
Effect
Potential that a patient would not receive the appropriate sliding fee discount.
Questioned Costs
None identified.
Cause
Clerical error in which the incorrect discount was applied due to lack of an oversight process in place.
Recommendation
We recommend the Organization to review internal controls in regards to the determination, recording, and monitoring of the sliding fee process to ensure that appropriate sliding fee rates/categories are utilized for each sliding fee encounter.
Views of Responsible Officials
The Organization’s enrollment and billing department will work together to identify when any errors occur based on the documentation the patient provides. The enrollment team will verify the rate, and the billing and coding team will begin checking to ensure the rate that the patient was screened for is the rate the patient is being charged for and that the correct discount applies.
Criteria or Specific Requirement
2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards requires compliance with the provisions of procurement and suspension and debarment. The Organization should have internal controls designed to ensure compliance with these provisions.
Condition and Context
During our testing over suspension and debarment, we noted the three instances in which the Organization did not perform the suspension and debarment check prior to entering into a transaction with a vendor.
Effect
The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance could result in possible federal funds being provided to ineligible vendors.
Questioned Costs
None identified.
Cause
The Organization lacks established internal controls and procedures over financial grant management. The Organization did not perform the suspension and debarment check prior to entering into the transactions.
Recommendation
We recommend the Organization implement a process to ensure suspension and debarment checks are performed and documentation to show that the checks are occurring prior to entering into transactions with vendors.
Views of Responsible Officials
Suspension and Debarment checks were occurring prior to a transaction with a new vendor; however, the checks were not saved. Any new vendor will have a check, and if we check them manually, we will begin to save these checks as documentation. We also implemented Compliatrics early in 2022 where we can enter our vendors into this system to do an auto check every month. It will flag us when a vendor is on the exclusion listing. Dell and NCHA were checked prior to transactions being entered into, but the documentation was not saved. These two vendors began being checked monthly through Compliatrics starting February 1, 2022. Amazon has now been entered into Compliatrics and is being checked monthly. Amazon was checked prior to using them as a vendor, but the documentation was not saved. As of June 8, 2023, Amazon is not on the exclusion list. We have begun to enter all vendors we utilize into this system.
Criteria or Specific Requirement
2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of procurement and suspension and debarment. The Organization should have internal controls designed to ensure compliance with these provisions.
Condition and Context
We noted the Organization is not in compliance with requirements related to Procurement, Suspension and Debarment. During our testing, we noted the following exceptions:
• SCH The Organization’s procurement policy did not meet the requirements defined by
2 CFR 200.
• The Organization did not retain support to document the procurement methods followed (I.e., sole source, small purchases, sealed bids, proposals, etc.).
Effect
The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in possible federal funds provided to ineligible subrecipients and/or vendors.
Questioned Costs
None identified.
Cause
The Organization lacks a uniform Procurement, Suspension & Debarment policy that is in compliance with the Federal regulations and/or the terms and conditions of the Federal award.
Recommendation
• We recommend the Organization review and update its procurement policy to ensure the policy meets the 2 CFR Part 200 Procurement requirements.
• We recommend the Organization retain all documentation and support to show that the procurement policy was followed.
Views of Responsible Officials
The Organization will be reviewing and updating our procurement policy for any missing items not currently noted in our policies or procedures. Gateway and RC Telecom are our sole-source vendors based on the scope and nature of the work and our unique phone system set up. However, no documentation was recorded or kept for this vendor, besides quotes prior to purchases as well as purchase orders per our current purchasing procedure. Our current policy does mention competitive bidding, and the procedure mentions sole-source documentation and what we use for this documentation (currently a bid or quotation), but we need to expand and not just reference the CFR, but at minimum list our thresholds for procurement methods and other required elements. When we meet the bidding threshold, sealed bids are kept in our files. We have not had any sealed bid purchases in fiscal year 2023.
Criteria or Specific Requirement
Per Title 42 Chapter 1 Subchapter D Section 51c303(f), “Health centers must have a schedule of fees or payments for the provision of their health services consistent with locally prevailing rates or charges designed to cover their reasonable costs of operation. They are also required to have a corresponding schedule of discounts applied and adjusted on the basis of the patient’s ability to pay.”
Condition and Context
During our testing of forty sliding fee discounts for health center patients qualifying for reduced charge visits, we identified two visits that received the incorrect sliding fee discount.
Effect
Potential that a patient would not receive the appropriate sliding fee discount.
Questioned Costs
None identified.
Cause
Clerical error in which the incorrect discount was applied due to lack of an oversight process in place.
Recommendation
We recommend the Organization to review internal controls in regards to the determination, recording, and monitoring of the sliding fee process to ensure that appropriate sliding fee rates/categories are utilized for each sliding fee encounter.
Views of Responsible Officials
The Organization’s enrollment and billing department will work together to identify when any errors occur based on the documentation the patient provides. The enrollment team will verify the rate, and the billing and coding team will begin checking to ensure the rate that the patient was screened for is the rate the patient is being charged for and that the correct discount applies.
Criteria or Specific Requirement
2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards requires compliance with the provisions of procurement and suspension and debarment. The Organization should have internal controls designed to ensure compliance with these provisions.
Condition and Context
During our testing over suspension and debarment, we noted the three instances in which the Organization did not perform the suspension and debarment check prior to entering into a transaction with a vendor.
Effect
The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance could result in possible federal funds being provided to ineligible vendors.
Questioned Costs
None identified.
Cause
The Organization lacks established internal controls and procedures over financial grant management. The Organization did not perform the suspension and debarment check prior to entering into the transactions.
Recommendation
We recommend the Organization implement a process to ensure suspension and debarment checks are performed and documentation to show that the checks are occurring prior to entering into transactions with vendors.
Views of Responsible Officials
Suspension and Debarment checks were occurring prior to a transaction with a new vendor; however, the checks were not saved. Any new vendor will have a check, and if we check them manually, we will begin to save these checks as documentation. We also implemented Compliatrics early in 2022 where we can enter our vendors into this system to do an auto check every month. It will flag us when a vendor is on the exclusion listing. Dell and NCHA were checked prior to transactions being entered into, but the documentation was not saved. These two vendors began being checked monthly through Compliatrics starting February 1, 2022. Amazon has now been entered into Compliatrics and is being checked monthly. Amazon was checked prior to using them as a vendor, but the documentation was not saved. As of June 8, 2023, Amazon is not on the exclusion list. We have begun to enter all vendors we utilize into this system.
Criteria or Specific Requirement
2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of procurement and suspension and debarment. The Organization should have internal controls designed to ensure compliance with these provisions.
Condition and Context
We noted the Organization is not in compliance with requirements related to Procurement, Suspension and Debarment. During our testing, we noted the following exceptions:
• SCH The Organization’s procurement policy did not meet the requirements defined by
2 CFR 200.
• The Organization did not retain support to document the procurement methods followed (I.e., sole source, small purchases, sealed bids, proposals, etc.).
Effect
The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in possible federal funds provided to ineligible subrecipients and/or vendors.
Questioned Costs
None identified.
Cause
The Organization lacks a uniform Procurement, Suspension & Debarment policy that is in compliance with the Federal regulations and/or the terms and conditions of the Federal award.
Recommendation
• We recommend the Organization review and update its procurement policy to ensure the policy meets the 2 CFR Part 200 Procurement requirements.
• We recommend the Organization retain all documentation and support to show that the procurement policy was followed.
Views of Responsible Officials
The Organization will be reviewing and updating our procurement policy for any missing items not currently noted in our policies or procedures. Gateway and RC Telecom are our sole-source vendors based on the scope and nature of the work and our unique phone system set up. However, no documentation was recorded or kept for this vendor, besides quotes prior to purchases as well as purchase orders per our current purchasing procedure. Our current policy does mention competitive bidding, and the procedure mentions sole-source documentation and what we use for this documentation (currently a bid or quotation), but we need to expand and not just reference the CFR, but at minimum list our thresholds for procurement methods and other required elements. When we meet the bidding threshold, sealed bids are kept in our files. We have not had any sealed bid purchases in fiscal year 2023.
Criteria or Specific Requirement
Per Title 42 Chapter 1 Subchapter D Section 51c303(f), “Health centers must have a schedule of fees or payments for the provision of their health services consistent with locally prevailing rates or charges designed to cover their reasonable costs of operation. They are also required to have a corresponding schedule of discounts applied and adjusted on the basis of the patient’s ability to pay.”
Condition and Context
During our testing of forty sliding fee discounts for health center patients qualifying for reduced charge visits, we identified two visits that received the incorrect sliding fee discount.
Effect
Potential that a patient would not receive the appropriate sliding fee discount.
Questioned Costs
None identified.
Cause
Clerical error in which the incorrect discount was applied due to lack of an oversight process in place.
Recommendation
We recommend the Organization to review internal controls in regards to the determination, recording, and monitoring of the sliding fee process to ensure that appropriate sliding fee rates/categories are utilized for each sliding fee encounter.
Views of Responsible Officials
The Organization’s enrollment and billing department will work together to identify when any errors occur based on the documentation the patient provides. The enrollment team will verify the rate, and the billing and coding team will begin checking to ensure the rate that the patient was screened for is the rate the patient is being charged for and that the correct discount applies.
Criteria or Specific Requirement
2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards requires compliance with the provisions of procurement and suspension and debarment. The Organization should have internal controls designed to ensure compliance with these provisions.
Condition and Context
During our testing over suspension and debarment, we noted the three instances in which the Organization did not perform the suspension and debarment check prior to entering into a transaction with a vendor.
Effect
The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance could result in possible federal funds being provided to ineligible vendors.
Questioned Costs
None identified.
Cause
The Organization lacks established internal controls and procedures over financial grant management. The Organization did not perform the suspension and debarment check prior to entering into the transactions.
Recommendation
We recommend the Organization implement a process to ensure suspension and debarment checks are performed and documentation to show that the checks are occurring prior to entering into transactions with vendors.
Views of Responsible Officials
Suspension and Debarment checks were occurring prior to a transaction with a new vendor; however, the checks were not saved. Any new vendor will have a check, and if we check them manually, we will begin to save these checks as documentation. We also implemented Compliatrics early in 2022 where we can enter our vendors into this system to do an auto check every month. It will flag us when a vendor is on the exclusion listing. Dell and NCHA were checked prior to transactions being entered into, but the documentation was not saved. These two vendors began being checked monthly through Compliatrics starting February 1, 2022. Amazon has now been entered into Compliatrics and is being checked monthly. Amazon was checked prior to using them as a vendor, but the documentation was not saved. As of June 8, 2023, Amazon is not on the exclusion list. We have begun to enter all vendors we utilize into this system.
Criteria or Specific Requirement
2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of procurement and suspension and debarment. The Organization should have internal controls designed to ensure compliance with these provisions.
Condition and Context
We noted the Organization is not in compliance with requirements related to Procurement, Suspension and Debarment. During our testing, we noted the following exceptions:
• SCH The Organization’s procurement policy did not meet the requirements defined by
2 CFR 200.
• The Organization did not retain support to document the procurement methods followed (I.e., sole source, small purchases, sealed bids, proposals, etc.).
Effect
The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in possible federal funds provided to ineligible subrecipients and/or vendors.
Questioned Costs
None identified.
Cause
The Organization lacks a uniform Procurement, Suspension & Debarment policy that is in compliance with the Federal regulations and/or the terms and conditions of the Federal award.
Recommendation
• We recommend the Organization review and update its procurement policy to ensure the policy meets the 2 CFR Part 200 Procurement requirements.
• We recommend the Organization retain all documentation and support to show that the procurement policy was followed.
Views of Responsible Officials
The Organization will be reviewing and updating our procurement policy for any missing items not currently noted in our policies or procedures. Gateway and RC Telecom are our sole-source vendors based on the scope and nature of the work and our unique phone system set up. However, no documentation was recorded or kept for this vendor, besides quotes prior to purchases as well as purchase orders per our current purchasing procedure. Our current policy does mention competitive bidding, and the procedure mentions sole-source documentation and what we use for this documentation (currently a bid or quotation), but we need to expand and not just reference the CFR, but at minimum list our thresholds for procurement methods and other required elements. When we meet the bidding threshold, sealed bids are kept in our files. We have not had any sealed bid purchases in fiscal year 2023.
Criteria or Specific Requirement
Per Title 42 Chapter 1 Subchapter D Section 51c303(f), “Health centers must have a schedule of fees or payments for the provision of their health services consistent with locally prevailing rates or charges designed to cover their reasonable costs of operation. They are also required to have a corresponding schedule of discounts applied and adjusted on the basis of the patient’s ability to pay.”
Condition and Context
During our testing of forty sliding fee discounts for health center patients qualifying for reduced charge visits, we identified two visits that received the incorrect sliding fee discount.
Effect
Potential that a patient would not receive the appropriate sliding fee discount.
Questioned Costs
None identified.
Cause
Clerical error in which the incorrect discount was applied due to lack of an oversight process in place.
Recommendation
We recommend the Organization to review internal controls in regards to the determination, recording, and monitoring of the sliding fee process to ensure that appropriate sliding fee rates/categories are utilized for each sliding fee encounter.
Views of Responsible Officials
The Organization’s enrollment and billing department will work together to identify when any errors occur based on the documentation the patient provides. The enrollment team will verify the rate, and the billing and coding team will begin checking to ensure the rate that the patient was screened for is the rate the patient is being charged for and that the correct discount applies.
Criteria or Specific Requirement
2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards requires compliance with the provisions of procurement and suspension and debarment. The Organization should have internal controls designed to ensure compliance with these provisions.
Condition and Context
During our testing over suspension and debarment, we noted the three instances in which the Organization did not perform the suspension and debarment check prior to entering into a transaction with a vendor.
Effect
The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance could result in possible federal funds being provided to ineligible vendors.
Questioned Costs
None identified.
Cause
The Organization lacks established internal controls and procedures over financial grant management. The Organization did not perform the suspension and debarment check prior to entering into the transactions.
Recommendation
We recommend the Organization implement a process to ensure suspension and debarment checks are performed and documentation to show that the checks are occurring prior to entering into transactions with vendors.
Views of Responsible Officials
Suspension and Debarment checks were occurring prior to a transaction with a new vendor; however, the checks were not saved. Any new vendor will have a check, and if we check them manually, we will begin to save these checks as documentation. We also implemented Compliatrics early in 2022 where we can enter our vendors into this system to do an auto check every month. It will flag us when a vendor is on the exclusion listing. Dell and NCHA were checked prior to transactions being entered into, but the documentation was not saved. These two vendors began being checked monthly through Compliatrics starting February 1, 2022. Amazon has now been entered into Compliatrics and is being checked monthly. Amazon was checked prior to using them as a vendor, but the documentation was not saved. As of June 8, 2023, Amazon is not on the exclusion list. We have begun to enter all vendors we utilize into this system.
Criteria or Specific Requirement
2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of procurement and suspension and debarment. The Organization should have internal controls designed to ensure compliance with these provisions.
Condition and Context
We noted the Organization is not in compliance with requirements related to Procurement, Suspension and Debarment. During our testing, we noted the following exceptions:
• SCH The Organization’s procurement policy did not meet the requirements defined by
2 CFR 200.
• The Organization did not retain support to document the procurement methods followed (I.e., sole source, small purchases, sealed bids, proposals, etc.).
Effect
The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in possible federal funds provided to ineligible subrecipients and/or vendors.
Questioned Costs
None identified.
Cause
The Organization lacks a uniform Procurement, Suspension & Debarment policy that is in compliance with the Federal regulations and/or the terms and conditions of the Federal award.
Recommendation
• We recommend the Organization review and update its procurement policy to ensure the policy meets the 2 CFR Part 200 Procurement requirements.
• We recommend the Organization retain all documentation and support to show that the procurement policy was followed.
Views of Responsible Officials
The Organization will be reviewing and updating our procurement policy for any missing items not currently noted in our policies or procedures. Gateway and RC Telecom are our sole-source vendors based on the scope and nature of the work and our unique phone system set up. However, no documentation was recorded or kept for this vendor, besides quotes prior to purchases as well as purchase orders per our current purchasing procedure. Our current policy does mention competitive bidding, and the procedure mentions sole-source documentation and what we use for this documentation (currently a bid or quotation), but we need to expand and not just reference the CFR, but at minimum list our thresholds for procurement methods and other required elements. When we meet the bidding threshold, sealed bids are kept in our files. We have not had any sealed bid purchases in fiscal year 2023.
Criteria or Specific Requirement
Per Title 42 Chapter 1 Subchapter D Section 51c303(f), “Health centers must have a schedule of fees or payments for the provision of their health services consistent with locally prevailing rates or charges designed to cover their reasonable costs of operation. They are also required to have a corresponding schedule of discounts applied and adjusted on the basis of the patient’s ability to pay.”
Condition and Context
During our testing of forty sliding fee discounts for health center patients qualifying for reduced charge visits, we identified two visits that received the incorrect sliding fee discount.
Effect
Potential that a patient would not receive the appropriate sliding fee discount.
Questioned Costs
None identified.
Cause
Clerical error in which the incorrect discount was applied due to lack of an oversight process in place.
Recommendation
We recommend the Organization to review internal controls in regards to the determination, recording, and monitoring of the sliding fee process to ensure that appropriate sliding fee rates/categories are utilized for each sliding fee encounter.
Views of Responsible Officials
The Organization’s enrollment and billing department will work together to identify when any errors occur based on the documentation the patient provides. The enrollment team will verify the rate, and the billing and coding team will begin checking to ensure the rate that the patient was screened for is the rate the patient is being charged for and that the correct discount applies.
Criteria or Specific Requirement
2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards requires compliance with the provisions of procurement and suspension and debarment. The Organization should have internal controls designed to ensure compliance with these provisions.
Condition and Context
During our testing over suspension and debarment, we noted the three instances in which the Organization did not perform the suspension and debarment check prior to entering into a transaction with a vendor.
Effect
The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance could result in possible federal funds being provided to ineligible vendors.
Questioned Costs
None identified.
Cause
The Organization lacks established internal controls and procedures over financial grant management. The Organization did not perform the suspension and debarment check prior to entering into the transactions.
Recommendation
We recommend the Organization implement a process to ensure suspension and debarment checks are performed and documentation to show that the checks are occurring prior to entering into transactions with vendors.
Views of Responsible Officials
Suspension and Debarment checks were occurring prior to a transaction with a new vendor; however, the checks were not saved. Any new vendor will have a check, and if we check them manually, we will begin to save these checks as documentation. We also implemented Compliatrics early in 2022 where we can enter our vendors into this system to do an auto check every month. It will flag us when a vendor is on the exclusion listing. Dell and NCHA were checked prior to transactions being entered into, but the documentation was not saved. These two vendors began being checked monthly through Compliatrics starting February 1, 2022. Amazon has now been entered into Compliatrics and is being checked monthly. Amazon was checked prior to using them as a vendor, but the documentation was not saved. As of June 8, 2023, Amazon is not on the exclusion list. We have begun to enter all vendors we utilize into this system.
Criteria or Specific Requirement
2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of procurement and suspension and debarment. The Organization should have internal controls designed to ensure compliance with these provisions.
Condition and Context
We noted the Organization is not in compliance with requirements related to Procurement, Suspension and Debarment. During our testing, we noted the following exceptions:
• SCH The Organization’s procurement policy did not meet the requirements defined by
2 CFR 200.
• The Organization did not retain support to document the procurement methods followed (I.e., sole source, small purchases, sealed bids, proposals, etc.).
Effect
The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in possible federal funds provided to ineligible subrecipients and/or vendors.
Questioned Costs
None identified.
Cause
The Organization lacks a uniform Procurement, Suspension & Debarment policy that is in compliance with the Federal regulations and/or the terms and conditions of the Federal award.
Recommendation
• We recommend the Organization review and update its procurement policy to ensure the policy meets the 2 CFR Part 200 Procurement requirements.
• We recommend the Organization retain all documentation and support to show that the procurement policy was followed.
Views of Responsible Officials
The Organization will be reviewing and updating our procurement policy for any missing items not currently noted in our policies or procedures. Gateway and RC Telecom are our sole-source vendors based on the scope and nature of the work and our unique phone system set up. However, no documentation was recorded or kept for this vendor, besides quotes prior to purchases as well as purchase orders per our current purchasing procedure. Our current policy does mention competitive bidding, and the procedure mentions sole-source documentation and what we use for this documentation (currently a bid or quotation), but we need to expand and not just reference the CFR, but at minimum list our thresholds for procurement methods and other required elements. When we meet the bidding threshold, sealed bids are kept in our files. We have not had any sealed bid purchases in fiscal year 2023.
Criteria or Specific Requirement
Per Title 42 Chapter 1 Subchapter D Section 51c303(f), “Health centers must have a schedule of fees or payments for the provision of their health services consistent with locally prevailing rates or charges designed to cover their reasonable costs of operation. They are also required to have a corresponding schedule of discounts applied and adjusted on the basis of the patient’s ability to pay.”
Condition and Context
During our testing of forty sliding fee discounts for health center patients qualifying for reduced charge visits, we identified two visits that received the incorrect sliding fee discount.
Effect
Potential that a patient would not receive the appropriate sliding fee discount.
Questioned Costs
None identified.
Cause
Clerical error in which the incorrect discount was applied due to lack of an oversight process in place.
Recommendation
We recommend the Organization to review internal controls in regards to the determination, recording, and monitoring of the sliding fee process to ensure that appropriate sliding fee rates/categories are utilized for each sliding fee encounter.
Views of Responsible Officials
The Organization’s enrollment and billing department will work together to identify when any errors occur based on the documentation the patient provides. The enrollment team will verify the rate, and the billing and coding team will begin checking to ensure the rate that the patient was screened for is the rate the patient is being charged for and that the correct discount applies.
Criteria or Specific Requirement
2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards requires compliance with the provisions of procurement and suspension and debarment. The Organization should have internal controls designed to ensure compliance with these provisions.
Condition and Context
During our testing over suspension and debarment, we noted the three instances in which the Organization did not perform the suspension and debarment check prior to entering into a transaction with a vendor.
Effect
The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance could result in possible federal funds being provided to ineligible vendors.
Questioned Costs
None identified.
Cause
The Organization lacks established internal controls and procedures over financial grant management. The Organization did not perform the suspension and debarment check prior to entering into the transactions.
Recommendation
We recommend the Organization implement a process to ensure suspension and debarment checks are performed and documentation to show that the checks are occurring prior to entering into transactions with vendors.
Views of Responsible Officials
Suspension and Debarment checks were occurring prior to a transaction with a new vendor; however, the checks were not saved. Any new vendor will have a check, and if we check them manually, we will begin to save these checks as documentation. We also implemented Compliatrics early in 2022 where we can enter our vendors into this system to do an auto check every month. It will flag us when a vendor is on the exclusion listing. Dell and NCHA were checked prior to transactions being entered into, but the documentation was not saved. These two vendors began being checked monthly through Compliatrics starting February 1, 2022. Amazon has now been entered into Compliatrics and is being checked monthly. Amazon was checked prior to using them as a vendor, but the documentation was not saved. As of June 8, 2023, Amazon is not on the exclusion list. We have begun to enter all vendors we utilize into this system.
Criteria or Specific Requirement
2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of procurement and suspension and debarment. The Organization should have internal controls designed to ensure compliance with these provisions.
Condition and Context
We noted the Organization is not in compliance with requirements related to Procurement, Suspension and Debarment. During our testing, we noted the following exceptions:
• SCH The Organization’s procurement policy did not meet the requirements defined by
2 CFR 200.
• The Organization did not retain support to document the procurement methods followed (I.e., sole source, small purchases, sealed bids, proposals, etc.).
Effect
The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in possible federal funds provided to ineligible subrecipients and/or vendors.
Questioned Costs
None identified.
Cause
The Organization lacks a uniform Procurement, Suspension & Debarment policy that is in compliance with the Federal regulations and/or the terms and conditions of the Federal award.
Recommendation
• We recommend the Organization review and update its procurement policy to ensure the policy meets the 2 CFR Part 200 Procurement requirements.
• We recommend the Organization retain all documentation and support to show that the procurement policy was followed.
Views of Responsible Officials
The Organization will be reviewing and updating our procurement policy for any missing items not currently noted in our policies or procedures. Gateway and RC Telecom are our sole-source vendors based on the scope and nature of the work and our unique phone system set up. However, no documentation was recorded or kept for this vendor, besides quotes prior to purchases as well as purchase orders per our current purchasing procedure. Our current policy does mention competitive bidding, and the procedure mentions sole-source documentation and what we use for this documentation (currently a bid or quotation), but we need to expand and not just reference the CFR, but at minimum list our thresholds for procurement methods and other required elements. When we meet the bidding threshold, sealed bids are kept in our files. We have not had any sealed bid purchases in fiscal year 2023.
Criteria or Specific Requirement
Per Title 42 Chapter 1 Subchapter D Section 51c303(f), “Health centers must have a schedule of fees or payments for the provision of their health services consistent with locally prevailing rates or charges designed to cover their reasonable costs of operation. They are also required to have a corresponding schedule of discounts applied and adjusted on the basis of the patient’s ability to pay.”
Condition and Context
During our testing of forty sliding fee discounts for health center patients qualifying for reduced charge visits, we identified two visits that received the incorrect sliding fee discount.
Effect
Potential that a patient would not receive the appropriate sliding fee discount.
Questioned Costs
None identified.
Cause
Clerical error in which the incorrect discount was applied due to lack of an oversight process in place.
Recommendation
We recommend the Organization to review internal controls in regards to the determination, recording, and monitoring of the sliding fee process to ensure that appropriate sliding fee rates/categories are utilized for each sliding fee encounter.
Views of Responsible Officials
The Organization’s enrollment and billing department will work together to identify when any errors occur based on the documentation the patient provides. The enrollment team will verify the rate, and the billing and coding team will begin checking to ensure the rate that the patient was screened for is the rate the patient is being charged for and that the correct discount applies.
Criteria or Specific Requirement
2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards requires compliance with the provisions of procurement and suspension and debarment. The Organization should have internal controls designed to ensure compliance with these provisions.
Condition and Context
During our testing over suspension and debarment, we noted the three instances in which the Organization did not perform the suspension and debarment check prior to entering into a transaction with a vendor.
Effect
The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance could result in possible federal funds being provided to ineligible vendors.
Questioned Costs
None identified.
Cause
The Organization lacks established internal controls and procedures over financial grant management. The Organization did not perform the suspension and debarment check prior to entering into the transactions.
Recommendation
We recommend the Organization implement a process to ensure suspension and debarment checks are performed and documentation to show that the checks are occurring prior to entering into transactions with vendors.
Views of Responsible Officials
Suspension and Debarment checks were occurring prior to a transaction with a new vendor; however, the checks were not saved. Any new vendor will have a check, and if we check them manually, we will begin to save these checks as documentation. We also implemented Compliatrics early in 2022 where we can enter our vendors into this system to do an auto check every month. It will flag us when a vendor is on the exclusion listing. Dell and NCHA were checked prior to transactions being entered into, but the documentation was not saved. These two vendors began being checked monthly through Compliatrics starting February 1, 2022. Amazon has now been entered into Compliatrics and is being checked monthly. Amazon was checked prior to using them as a vendor, but the documentation was not saved. As of June 8, 2023, Amazon is not on the exclusion list. We have begun to enter all vendors we utilize into this system.
Criteria or Specific Requirement
2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of procurement and suspension and debarment. The Organization should have internal controls designed to ensure compliance with these provisions.
Condition and Context
We noted the Organization is not in compliance with requirements related to Procurement, Suspension and Debarment. During our testing, we noted the following exceptions:
• SCH The Organization’s procurement policy did not meet the requirements defined by
2 CFR 200.
• The Organization did not retain support to document the procurement methods followed (I.e., sole source, small purchases, sealed bids, proposals, etc.).
Effect
The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in possible federal funds provided to ineligible subrecipients and/or vendors.
Questioned Costs
None identified.
Cause
The Organization lacks a uniform Procurement, Suspension & Debarment policy that is in compliance with the Federal regulations and/or the terms and conditions of the Federal award.
Recommendation
• We recommend the Organization review and update its procurement policy to ensure the policy meets the 2 CFR Part 200 Procurement requirements.
• We recommend the Organization retain all documentation and support to show that the procurement policy was followed.
Views of Responsible Officials
The Organization will be reviewing and updating our procurement policy for any missing items not currently noted in our policies or procedures. Gateway and RC Telecom are our sole-source vendors based on the scope and nature of the work and our unique phone system set up. However, no documentation was recorded or kept for this vendor, besides quotes prior to purchases as well as purchase orders per our current purchasing procedure. Our current policy does mention competitive bidding, and the procedure mentions sole-source documentation and what we use for this documentation (currently a bid or quotation), but we need to expand and not just reference the CFR, but at minimum list our thresholds for procurement methods and other required elements. When we meet the bidding threshold, sealed bids are kept in our files. We have not had any sealed bid purchases in fiscal year 2023.
Criteria or Specific Requirement
Per Title 42 Chapter 1 Subchapter D Section 51c303(f), “Health centers must have a schedule of fees or payments for the provision of their health services consistent with locally prevailing rates or charges designed to cover their reasonable costs of operation. They are also required to have a corresponding schedule of discounts applied and adjusted on the basis of the patient’s ability to pay.”
Condition and Context
During our testing of forty sliding fee discounts for health center patients qualifying for reduced charge visits, we identified two visits that received the incorrect sliding fee discount.
Effect
Potential that a patient would not receive the appropriate sliding fee discount.
Questioned Costs
None identified.
Cause
Clerical error in which the incorrect discount was applied due to lack of an oversight process in place.
Recommendation
We recommend the Organization to review internal controls in regards to the determination, recording, and monitoring of the sliding fee process to ensure that appropriate sliding fee rates/categories are utilized for each sliding fee encounter.
Views of Responsible Officials
The Organization’s enrollment and billing department will work together to identify when any errors occur based on the documentation the patient provides. The enrollment team will verify the rate, and the billing and coding team will begin checking to ensure the rate that the patient was screened for is the rate the patient is being charged for and that the correct discount applies.