Finding No. 2022-004: Procurement Policy ? Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Rare Disorders: Research, Surveillance, Health Promotion, and Education; Assistance Listing Number 93.315 Condition There is no evidence of a documented formal procurement policy with regards to federal grant awards and expenditures, no documented support that a competitive price analysis for vendors and organizations funded with federal grant funds were performed and no evidence that suspension and debarment verifications were performed for certain vendors and organizations, as required by the general procurement standards of the Uniform Guidance. Context We selected four samples which were deemed sole sourced by management and noted no written documentation for this conclusion or evidence of suspension or debarment verification being performed was maintained in the file. Based on our discussions with management, they were not aware of the Uniform Guidance requirements with regards to procurement. Criteria Under the Uniform Guidance Section 200.318, General Procurement Standards, a non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity?s documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in Sections 200.317 through 200.327. These sections include policies and procedures related to competition, informal and formal procurement methods and noncompetitive procurement also known as sole source. Under Uniform Guidance Section 200.214, Suspension and Debarment, and 2 CFR Part 180, non-federal entities are required to verify that vendors are not suspended or debarred from participating in federal funds. Cause Management stated it was not aware of the Uniform Guidance requirements with regards to procurement and, therefore, did not develop a procurement policy that includes the provisions of the general procurement standards required under the Uniform Guidance. Effect Charges relating to vendor services and sub-awards that were charged to the federal award may not be in accordance with the specific compliance requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs $97,078, representing total sub-awards and consulting expenses paid during the year. Repeat Finding No. Recommendation We recommend that the Association establish a written procurement policy governing contracts with vendors that will be reimbursed by federal grants to incorporate all of the provisions included in the general procurement standards of the Uniform Guidance Section 200.318 and the debarment and suspension regulations of Uniform Guidance Section 200.214. We also recommend that a review of all existing vendor or sub-awardee contract files be performed to ensure that the documentation as required under the Uniform Guidance is maintained in the files. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action See corrective action plan.
Finding No. 2022-005: Reporting ? Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance and Compliance; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Rare Disorders: Research, Surveillance, Health Promotion, and Education; Assistance Listing Number 93.315 Condition The Association does not have controls in place to ensure that FFATA reporting requirements were met. As a result, the Association did not submit the required data on its first-tier sub- awards. Context We requested a sample of the FFATA reporting for the Association?s major program, but we were not provided with the reports as they had not been completed. There was only one sub- recipient. Our sample of the first-tier sub-award was not a statistically valid sample. Criteria Under 2 CFR Part 170, recipients of grants or cooperative agreements are required to report first-tier sub-awards of $30,000 or more to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) Sub-award Reporting System (FSRS). Through FSRS, the recipient is responsible for submitting key data elements including sub-awardee name, DUNS number, amount of sub-award, sub-award obligation/action date, date of report submission, sub-award number, project description, and names and compensation of highly compensated officers. Cause The Association?s management stated it was unaware of the FFATA reporting requirements within the FSRS system. Effect The Association was not in compliance with the FFATA reporting requirements. Repeat Finding No Questioned Costs None Recommendation We recommend that management review all active sub-awards for the year ended December 31, 2022, and submit the required data elements within the FSRS system. Furthermore, we recommend that the Association?s management design control procedures to ensure that all reporting requirements are identified and submitted in a timely fashion. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action See Corrective Action Plan.
Finding No. 2022-004: Procurement Policy ? Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Rare Disorders: Research, Surveillance, Health Promotion, and Education; Assistance Listing Number 93.315 Condition There is no evidence of a documented formal procurement policy with regards to federal grant awards and expenditures, no documented support that a competitive price analysis for vendors and organizations funded with federal grant funds were performed and no evidence that suspension and debarment verifications were performed for certain vendors and organizations, as required by the general procurement standards of the Uniform Guidance. Context We selected four samples which were deemed sole sourced by management and noted no written documentation for this conclusion or evidence of suspension or debarment verification being performed was maintained in the file. Based on our discussions with management, they were not aware of the Uniform Guidance requirements with regards to procurement. Criteria Under the Uniform Guidance Section 200.318, General Procurement Standards, a non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity?s documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in Sections 200.317 through 200.327. These sections include policies and procedures related to competition, informal and formal procurement methods and noncompetitive procurement also known as sole source. Under Uniform Guidance Section 200.214, Suspension and Debarment, and 2 CFR Part 180, non-federal entities are required to verify that vendors are not suspended or debarred from participating in federal funds. Cause Management stated it was not aware of the Uniform Guidance requirements with regards to procurement and, therefore, did not develop a procurement policy that includes the provisions of the general procurement standards required under the Uniform Guidance. Effect Charges relating to vendor services and sub-awards that were charged to the federal award may not be in accordance with the specific compliance requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs $97,078, representing total sub-awards and consulting expenses paid during the year. Repeat Finding No. Recommendation We recommend that the Association establish a written procurement policy governing contracts with vendors that will be reimbursed by federal grants to incorporate all of the provisions included in the general procurement standards of the Uniform Guidance Section 200.318 and the debarment and suspension regulations of Uniform Guidance Section 200.214. We also recommend that a review of all existing vendor or sub-awardee contract files be performed to ensure that the documentation as required under the Uniform Guidance is maintained in the files. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action See corrective action plan.
Finding No. 2022-005: Reporting ? Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance and Compliance; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Rare Disorders: Research, Surveillance, Health Promotion, and Education; Assistance Listing Number 93.315 Condition The Association does not have controls in place to ensure that FFATA reporting requirements were met. As a result, the Association did not submit the required data on its first-tier sub- awards. Context We requested a sample of the FFATA reporting for the Association?s major program, but we were not provided with the reports as they had not been completed. There was only one sub- recipient. Our sample of the first-tier sub-award was not a statistically valid sample. Criteria Under 2 CFR Part 170, recipients of grants or cooperative agreements are required to report first-tier sub-awards of $30,000 or more to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) Sub-award Reporting System (FSRS). Through FSRS, the recipient is responsible for submitting key data elements including sub-awardee name, DUNS number, amount of sub-award, sub-award obligation/action date, date of report submission, sub-award number, project description, and names and compensation of highly compensated officers. Cause The Association?s management stated it was unaware of the FFATA reporting requirements within the FSRS system. Effect The Association was not in compliance with the FFATA reporting requirements. Repeat Finding No Questioned Costs None Recommendation We recommend that management review all active sub-awards for the year ended December 31, 2022, and submit the required data elements within the FSRS system. Furthermore, we recommend that the Association?s management design control procedures to ensure that all reporting requirements are identified and submitted in a timely fashion. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action See Corrective Action Plan.