Audit 47434

FY End
2022-09-30
Total Expended
$2.04M
Findings
2
Programs
1
Organization: Buck Owens Crystal Palace (CA)
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-08-07

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
44576 2022-001 Material Weakness - AB
621018 2022-001 Material Weakness - AB

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
59.075 Shuttered Venue Operators Grant Program $2.04M Yes 1

Contacts

Name Title Type
MQCFERKUB9B7 Jim Shaw Auditee
6616651450 Lindsey Zimmerman Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards includes the federal grant activity of the Buck Owens Private Foundation, Inc, and Subsidiary (the Foundation) and is presented on the modified accrual basis of accounting. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the Foundations consolidated financial statements. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate.

Finding Details

Program: Shuttered Venue Operations Program Assisting Lister Number: 59.075 Federal Grantor: U.S. Small Business Administration Passed-through: N/A Award No. and Year: SBAHQ21SV002930.2 and 2022 Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control and Instance of Non-Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430(i), Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses, states that charges to Federal awards for salaries and wage records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition: During our testing of the Foundation?s compliance with the Activities Allowed or Unallowed, and Allowable Costs/Costs Principles compliance requirements, we noted that in 37 of 40 payroll program expenditures selected, the employee?s timecard was not approved by a supervisor. Cause: The Foundation?s procedures did not consistently ensure that the review of timecards was documented. Effect: Lack of review and approval for personnel hours could lead to unallowable activities and costs to be charged to the Federal program. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Repeat Finding from Prior Years: N/A ? First year of Single Audit. Recommendation: We recommend that the Foundation modify and strengthen its current policies and procedures to ensure that all timecards consistently document evidence of approval. The procedures should also address the compensating controls for circumstances where obtaining a supervisor?s approval is not possible. View of Responsible Officials: Management agrees and has designed controls for the supervisor to approve the timecards and ensure the costs are allowable costs.
Program: Shuttered Venue Operations Program Assisting Lister Number: 59.075 Federal Grantor: U.S. Small Business Administration Passed-through: N/A Award No. and Year: SBAHQ21SV002930.2 and 2022 Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control and Instance of Non-Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430(i), Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses, states that charges to Federal awards for salaries and wage records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition: During our testing of the Foundation?s compliance with the Activities Allowed or Unallowed, and Allowable Costs/Costs Principles compliance requirements, we noted that in 37 of 40 payroll program expenditures selected, the employee?s timecard was not approved by a supervisor. Cause: The Foundation?s procedures did not consistently ensure that the review of timecards was documented. Effect: Lack of review and approval for personnel hours could lead to unallowable activities and costs to be charged to the Federal program. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Repeat Finding from Prior Years: N/A ? First year of Single Audit. Recommendation: We recommend that the Foundation modify and strengthen its current policies and procedures to ensure that all timecards consistently document evidence of approval. The procedures should also address the compensating controls for circumstances where obtaining a supervisor?s approval is not possible. View of Responsible Officials: Management agrees and has designed controls for the supervisor to approve the timecards and ensure the costs are allowable costs.