Audit 47009

FY End
2022-06-30
Total Expended
$983,315
Findings
4
Programs
2
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-04-16

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
48498 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - P
48499 2022-002 Material Weakness - P
624940 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - P
624941 2022-002 Material Weakness - P

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
10.923 Emergency Watershed Protection Program $908,315 Yes 2
15.608 Fish and Wildlife Management Assistance $75,000 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
E1ULMFNZKEF8 Anita Bartlett Auditee
3077382321 Jason Lund Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards includes federal grant activity ofthe Powder River Conservation District. The District receives federal awards directly from USagencies.Federal program expenditures included in the accompanying schedule are presented on the cashbasis of accounting. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate.

Finding Details

2022-001 Uniform Guidance Written Policies and Procedures ? Significant Deficiency Criteria: Uniform Guidance policies requires 2 CFR Part 180, which states written policies and procedures related to internal controls be written regarding SAMS.gov contractor verification of debarment and suspension. In addition, 200.326 Contract Provisions that pay over $2,000 in labor wages require to be in compliant with Davis Bacon Labor Laws. This requirement contains written acknowledge of certified wage rate payrolls weekly and contractual language of the wage rate certification of payroll in the contract between the contractor and the District. Condition: We found that Powder River Conservation District does not have written updated policies implementing Uniform Guidance contractual and internal control procedures. Cause & Effect: The cause appears to be the result of a lack of experience, and the effect is non-compliance and the possibility of entering into transactions with debarred or suspended vendors, and not paying adequate Federal wages to labors. Questioned Costs: -0- Recommendation: We recommend that the District update and implement written internal control policies that coincide with Federal grant requirements and contain all Uniform Guidance regulations, relating to Sams.gov debarment and suspension, Davis-Bacon Wage Requirements and internal controls. Management Response: See the last page of this report for Management?s response as found on the District?s letterhead.
2022-002 Cost Sharing Requirements ? Material Weakness Criteria: The Emergency Watershed Protection Program has a cost sharing requirement of Federal and non-Federal participation. The non-Federal portion, of the participation of funds must not utilize other Federal dollars toward meeting the cost-share requirement of this award. Cost sharing must come from non-Federal sources. Cause: Powder River Conservation District used Federal Fish & Game funds to match the non-Federal portion of the Emergency Watershed Protection Program. Condition: Federal funds to match other Federal funds are not allowed according to the cost sharing participation agreement Effect: The District must use matching funds in-accordance to the Federal grant cost sharing requirements. Questioned Costs: $75,000 Recommendation: We recommend that the District follow the agreements of the grant requirements and receive updated training for personnel on OMB requirements of Federal grants. Management Response: See the last page of this report for Management?s response as found on the District?s letterhead.
2022-001 Uniform Guidance Written Policies and Procedures ? Significant Deficiency Criteria: Uniform Guidance policies requires 2 CFR Part 180, which states written policies and procedures related to internal controls be written regarding SAMS.gov contractor verification of debarment and suspension. In addition, 200.326 Contract Provisions that pay over $2,000 in labor wages require to be in compliant with Davis Bacon Labor Laws. This requirement contains written acknowledge of certified wage rate payrolls weekly and contractual language of the wage rate certification of payroll in the contract between the contractor and the District. Condition: We found that Powder River Conservation District does not have written updated policies implementing Uniform Guidance contractual and internal control procedures. Cause & Effect: The cause appears to be the result of a lack of experience, and the effect is non-compliance and the possibility of entering into transactions with debarred or suspended vendors, and not paying adequate Federal wages to labors. Questioned Costs: -0- Recommendation: We recommend that the District update and implement written internal control policies that coincide with Federal grant requirements and contain all Uniform Guidance regulations, relating to Sams.gov debarment and suspension, Davis-Bacon Wage Requirements and internal controls. Management Response: See the last page of this report for Management?s response as found on the District?s letterhead.
2022-002 Cost Sharing Requirements ? Material Weakness Criteria: The Emergency Watershed Protection Program has a cost sharing requirement of Federal and non-Federal participation. The non-Federal portion, of the participation of funds must not utilize other Federal dollars toward meeting the cost-share requirement of this award. Cost sharing must come from non-Federal sources. Cause: Powder River Conservation District used Federal Fish & Game funds to match the non-Federal portion of the Emergency Watershed Protection Program. Condition: Federal funds to match other Federal funds are not allowed according to the cost sharing participation agreement Effect: The District must use matching funds in-accordance to the Federal grant cost sharing requirements. Questioned Costs: $75,000 Recommendation: We recommend that the District follow the agreements of the grant requirements and receive updated training for personnel on OMB requirements of Federal grants. Management Response: See the last page of this report for Management?s response as found on the District?s letterhead.