Audit 46862

FY End
2022-11-30
Total Expended
$13.65M
Findings
4
Programs
11
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-05-02

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Contacts

Name Title Type
EXAXS7SKMNC9 Joshua Bunch Auditee
5094885256 Kyla Delgado Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: CONTRACT AMOUNT Accounting Policies: Expenditures - the expenditure amount represents the total grant award for period indicated. Indirect Cost Rate - The Association did not elect to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under Uniform Guidance. Federal Awards Passed Through to Subrecipients - The Association did not pass through any awards to subrecipients. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. The contract amount represents the total grant award for the period indicated.
Title: PROVIDER RELIEF FUNDS Accounting Policies: Expenditures - the expenditure amount represents the total grant award for period indicated. Indirect Cost Rate - The Association did not elect to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under Uniform Guidance. Federal Awards Passed Through to Subrecipients - The Association did not pass through any awards to subrecipients. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. The financial statements reflect revenue recognized from the Provider Relief Funds of $742,239 for the year ended November 30, 2022. The schedule includes Provider Relief Funds of $742,239 that were received in Period 2 in accordance with the requirements of the compliance supplement for assistance listing number 93.498.
Title: BASIS OF PRESENTATION Accounting Policies: Expenditures - the expenditure amount represents the total grant award for period indicated. Indirect Cost Rate - The Association did not elect to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under Uniform Guidance. Federal Awards Passed Through to Subrecipients - The Association did not pass through any awards to subrecipients. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal award activity of the Association under programs of the federal government for the year ended November 30, 2022. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Association, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of the Association.

Finding Details

Finding 2022-001: Program Name/ALN Title: Health Center Cluster Federal Assistance Listing Number: 93.224/93.527 Federal Agency: U.S Department of Health and Human Services Award Period: 1/1/2022 ? 12/31/2022 Federal Award Number: N/A Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria: Under the compliance requirement for Special Tests and Provisions for ALN 93.224/93.527, ?health centers must prepare and apply a sliding fee discount schedule (SFDS) so that the amounts owed for health c enter services by eligible patients are adjusted (discounted) based on the patients ability to pay?. In on identified instance, an incorrect sliding fee discount was applied, resulting in the patient being overcharged for services provided. Condition: CLA identified one instance of the key control not being met while performing testing over the special tests and provisions compliance requirements. Context: CLA identified one instance out of forty total tested of which the key control was not being met while performing testing over the special tests and provisions compliance requirement. Cause: The sliding fee application effective for the transaction tested indicated the patient qualified for a Level 1 sliding fee discount, however, the system was not updated for this change and the patient?s charges were applied to the previous Level 3 sliding fee discount on file for the patient. Effect: Incorrect sliding fee discount was applied to the transaction tested resulting in the patient being overcharged for services. Recommendation: We recommend that CBHA implement a process for evaluating each patient application contract to ensure the most up to date patient application is being used to determine the appropriate slide amount to be applied. Views of the Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Finding 2022-001: Program Name/ALN Title: Health Center Cluster Federal Assistance Listing Number: 93.224/93.527 Federal Agency: U.S Department of Health and Human Services Award Period: 1/1/2022 ? 12/31/2022 Federal Award Number: N/A Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria: Under the compliance requirement for Special Tests and Provisions for ALN 93.224/93.527, ?health centers must prepare and apply a sliding fee discount schedule (SFDS) so that the amounts owed for health c enter services by eligible patients are adjusted (discounted) based on the patients ability to pay?. In on identified instance, an incorrect sliding fee discount was applied, resulting in the patient being overcharged for services provided. Condition: CLA identified one instance of the key control not being met while performing testing over the special tests and provisions compliance requirements. Context: CLA identified one instance out of forty total tested of which the key control was not being met while performing testing over the special tests and provisions compliance requirement. Cause: The sliding fee application effective for the transaction tested indicated the patient qualified for a Level 1 sliding fee discount, however, the system was not updated for this change and the patient?s charges were applied to the previous Level 3 sliding fee discount on file for the patient. Effect: Incorrect sliding fee discount was applied to the transaction tested resulting in the patient being overcharged for services. Recommendation: We recommend that CBHA implement a process for evaluating each patient application contract to ensure the most up to date patient application is being used to determine the appropriate slide amount to be applied. Views of the Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Finding 2022-001: Program Name/ALN Title: Health Center Cluster Federal Assistance Listing Number: 93.224/93.527 Federal Agency: U.S Department of Health and Human Services Award Period: 1/1/2022 ? 12/31/2022 Federal Award Number: N/A Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria: Under the compliance requirement for Special Tests and Provisions for ALN 93.224/93.527, ?health centers must prepare and apply a sliding fee discount schedule (SFDS) so that the amounts owed for health c enter services by eligible patients are adjusted (discounted) based on the patients ability to pay?. In on identified instance, an incorrect sliding fee discount was applied, resulting in the patient being overcharged for services provided. Condition: CLA identified one instance of the key control not being met while performing testing over the special tests and provisions compliance requirements. Context: CLA identified one instance out of forty total tested of which the key control was not being met while performing testing over the special tests and provisions compliance requirement. Cause: The sliding fee application effective for the transaction tested indicated the patient qualified for a Level 1 sliding fee discount, however, the system was not updated for this change and the patient?s charges were applied to the previous Level 3 sliding fee discount on file for the patient. Effect: Incorrect sliding fee discount was applied to the transaction tested resulting in the patient being overcharged for services. Recommendation: We recommend that CBHA implement a process for evaluating each patient application contract to ensure the most up to date patient application is being used to determine the appropriate slide amount to be applied. Views of the Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Finding 2022-001: Program Name/ALN Title: Health Center Cluster Federal Assistance Listing Number: 93.224/93.527 Federal Agency: U.S Department of Health and Human Services Award Period: 1/1/2022 ? 12/31/2022 Federal Award Number: N/A Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria: Under the compliance requirement for Special Tests and Provisions for ALN 93.224/93.527, ?health centers must prepare and apply a sliding fee discount schedule (SFDS) so that the amounts owed for health c enter services by eligible patients are adjusted (discounted) based on the patients ability to pay?. In on identified instance, an incorrect sliding fee discount was applied, resulting in the patient being overcharged for services provided. Condition: CLA identified one instance of the key control not being met while performing testing over the special tests and provisions compliance requirements. Context: CLA identified one instance out of forty total tested of which the key control was not being met while performing testing over the special tests and provisions compliance requirement. Cause: The sliding fee application effective for the transaction tested indicated the patient qualified for a Level 1 sliding fee discount, however, the system was not updated for this change and the patient?s charges were applied to the previous Level 3 sliding fee discount on file for the patient. Effect: Incorrect sliding fee discount was applied to the transaction tested resulting in the patient being overcharged for services. Recommendation: We recommend that CBHA implement a process for evaluating each patient application contract to ensure the most up to date patient application is being used to determine the appropriate slide amount to be applied. Views of the Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.