Audit 46222

FY End
2022-12-31
Total Expended
$3.90M
Findings
4
Programs
12
Organization: City of Terre Haute (IN)
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-09-19

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
38786 2022-002 Material Weakness - L
38787 2022-002 Material Weakness - L
615228 2022-002 Material Weakness - L
615229 2022-002 Material Weakness - L

Contacts

Name Title Type
LN2VMA6AXYP5 Leslie A. Ellis, CPA Auditee
8122442363 Beth Kelley, CPA Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting PoliciesA. Basis of PresentationThe accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) includes the federalgrant activity of the City under programs of the federal government for the year endedDecember 31, 2022. The information in the SEFA is presented in accordance with therequirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform AdministrativeRequirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UniformGuidance). Because the SEFA presents only a select portion of the operations of the City, itis not intended to and does not present the financial position of the City.B. Other Significant Accounting PoliciesExpenditures reported on the SEFA are reported on the cash basis of accounting. Suchexpenditures are recognized following, as applicable, either the cost principles in OMBCircular A-87, Cost Principles for State, Local, and Indian Tribal Governments, or the costprinciples contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are notallowed or are limited as to reimbursement. When federal grants are received on a reimbursementbasis, the federal awards are considered expended when the reimbursement isreceived. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate.

Finding Details

FINDING 2022-002 Subject: CDBG - Entitlement Grants Cluster - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Programs: Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants, COVID-19 - Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants Assistance Listings Number: 14.218 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): B-18-MC-18-0012, B-19-MC-18-0012, B-20-MC-18-0012, B-20-MW-18-0012, B-21-MC-18-0012 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Material Weakness Condition and Context The City had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls, which would include appropriate segregation of duties that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. Recipients are required to submit performance reports annually or quarterly depending on the specific CDBG Entitlement Grant received. Performance reports required to be submitted include the Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER), the IDIS Section 3 Report, and the Quarterly Performance Report (QPR) for the Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP) grant. As the City did not receive a NSP grant, its required performance reports were the CAPER and the IDIS Section 3 Report. The City submitted one CAPER and one IDIS Section 3 Report during the audit period; however, a single employee prepared and submitted the reports without a documented oversight, review, or approval process. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not implemented by management of the City, which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the City's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that provide segregation of duties and additional oversight as needed, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the City. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the City design and implement a proper system of internal controls that would provide segregation of duties for the preparation and review of federal reports to ensure appropriate reviews, approvals, and oversights are taking place. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-002 Subject: CDBG - Entitlement Grants Cluster - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Programs: Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants, COVID-19 - Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants Assistance Listings Number: 14.218 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): B-18-MC-18-0012, B-19-MC-18-0012, B-20-MC-18-0012, B-20-MW-18-0012, B-21-MC-18-0012 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Material Weakness Condition and Context The City had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls, which would include appropriate segregation of duties that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. Recipients are required to submit performance reports annually or quarterly depending on the specific CDBG Entitlement Grant received. Performance reports required to be submitted include the Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER), the IDIS Section 3 Report, and the Quarterly Performance Report (QPR) for the Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP) grant. As the City did not receive a NSP grant, its required performance reports were the CAPER and the IDIS Section 3 Report. The City submitted one CAPER and one IDIS Section 3 Report during the audit period; however, a single employee prepared and submitted the reports without a documented oversight, review, or approval process. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not implemented by management of the City, which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the City's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that provide segregation of duties and additional oversight as needed, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the City. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the City design and implement a proper system of internal controls that would provide segregation of duties for the preparation and review of federal reports to ensure appropriate reviews, approvals, and oversights are taking place. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-002 Subject: CDBG - Entitlement Grants Cluster - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Programs: Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants, COVID-19 - Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants Assistance Listings Number: 14.218 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): B-18-MC-18-0012, B-19-MC-18-0012, B-20-MC-18-0012, B-20-MW-18-0012, B-21-MC-18-0012 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Material Weakness Condition and Context The City had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls, which would include appropriate segregation of duties that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. Recipients are required to submit performance reports annually or quarterly depending on the specific CDBG Entitlement Grant received. Performance reports required to be submitted include the Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER), the IDIS Section 3 Report, and the Quarterly Performance Report (QPR) for the Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP) grant. As the City did not receive a NSP grant, its required performance reports were the CAPER and the IDIS Section 3 Report. The City submitted one CAPER and one IDIS Section 3 Report during the audit period; however, a single employee prepared and submitted the reports without a documented oversight, review, or approval process. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not implemented by management of the City, which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the City's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that provide segregation of duties and additional oversight as needed, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the City. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the City design and implement a proper system of internal controls that would provide segregation of duties for the preparation and review of federal reports to ensure appropriate reviews, approvals, and oversights are taking place. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-002 Subject: CDBG - Entitlement Grants Cluster - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Programs: Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants, COVID-19 - Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants Assistance Listings Number: 14.218 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): B-18-MC-18-0012, B-19-MC-18-0012, B-20-MC-18-0012, B-20-MW-18-0012, B-21-MC-18-0012 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Material Weakness Condition and Context The City had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls, which would include appropriate segregation of duties that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. Recipients are required to submit performance reports annually or quarterly depending on the specific CDBG Entitlement Grant received. Performance reports required to be submitted include the Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER), the IDIS Section 3 Report, and the Quarterly Performance Report (QPR) for the Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP) grant. As the City did not receive a NSP grant, its required performance reports were the CAPER and the IDIS Section 3 Report. The City submitted one CAPER and one IDIS Section 3 Report during the audit period; however, a single employee prepared and submitted the reports without a documented oversight, review, or approval process. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not implemented by management of the City, which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the City's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that provide segregation of duties and additional oversight as needed, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the City. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the City design and implement a proper system of internal controls that would provide segregation of duties for the preparation and review of federal reports to ensure appropriate reviews, approvals, and oversights are taking place. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.