Audit 45729

FY End
2022-06-30
Total Expended
$1.47M
Findings
2
Programs
1
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-02-28

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
44659 2022-001 Material Weakness Yes L
621101 2022-001 Material Weakness Yes L

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
10.760 Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities $1.47M Yes 1

Contacts

Name Title Type
DNKLBDQLMUB5 Becky Freeman Auditee
2316896047 Joe Verlin Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: NOTE 1 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting, which is described in Note 1 to the Authority's financial statements. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Pass-through entity identifying numbers are presented where available. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: For purposes of charging indirect costs to federal awards, the Authority has not elected to use the 10 percent de minimis cost rate as permitted by ?200.414 of the Uniform Guidance. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal grant activity of the White Cloud / Sherman Utilities Authority (the Authority) under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2022. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Authority, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net position or cash flows of the Authority.The Authoritys reporting entity is defined in Note 1 of the Authoritys Audited Financial Statements.
Title: NOTE 3 - RECONCILIATION TO THE SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting, which is described in Note 1 to the Authority's financial statements. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Pass-through entity identifying numbers are presented where available. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: For purposes of charging indirect costs to federal awards, the Authority has not elected to use the 10 percent de minimis cost rate as permitted by ?200.414 of the Uniform Guidance. Note 3 on page 37 of the .pdf reconciles the federal awards reported on the basic financial statements to the federal exenditures reported on the Schedule.
Title: NOTE 4 - BALANCE OF GUARANTEED LOANS Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting, which is described in Note 1 to the Authority's financial statements. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Pass-through entity identifying numbers are presented where available. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: For purposes of charging indirect costs to federal awards, the Authority has not elected to use the 10 percent de minimis cost rate as permitted by ?200.414 of the Uniform Guidance. Note 4 on page 37 of the .pdf discloses the loan additions during the year as well as the ending loan balance as of year-end.

Finding Details

2017-001 ? Material Audit Adjustments, Financial Statement Preparation, and Preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (Repeat Finding) Finding Type: Material weakness over financial reporting. Criteria: Management is responsible for establishing, maintaining, and monitoring internal controls, and for the fair presentation in the financial statements of financial position, results of operations, and cash flows, including the recording of all appropriate journal entries, so that the trial balances from which the audited financial statements are prepared, reflect amounts that are in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. In addition, the Authority is required to prepare appropriate financial statements, including the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the ?Schedule?). Condition/Finding: We prepared, and management approved of, significant adjustments to the Authority?s general ledger. Material adjustments were discovered during the audit process and because of this condition, the Authority is not in compliance with the required written procedures under the Uniform Guidance. As is the case with many small and medium-sized governmental units, the Authority has historically relied on its independent external auditor to assist with the preparation of the financial statements, the related notes, the management?s discussion and analysis, and, when applicable, the Schedule as part of its external financial reporting process. Accordingly, the Authority?s ability to prepare financial statements in accordance with GAAP is based, in part, on its reliance on its external auditor, who cannot, by definition, be considered part of the Authority?s internal controls. Having the auditor draft the annual financial statements is allowable under current auditing standards and ethical guidelines and may be the most efficient and effective method for preparation of the Authority?s financial statements. However, when an entity (on its own) lacks the ability to produce financial statements that conform to GAAP, or when material audit adjustments are identified by the auditor, auditing standards require that such conditions be communicated in writing as material weaknesses. This is a repeat finding. Cause: This condition was caused by the Authority?s decision to outsource the preparation of its annual financial statements to the external auditor rather than incur the costs of obtaining the necessary training and expertise required for the Authority to perform this task internally because outsourcing the task is considered more cost effective. Effect: The financial statements, and Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards, were initially materially misstated until adjusting entries were proposed during the audit. Recommendation: We recommend that management continue to monitor the relative costs and benefits of securing the internal or other external resources necessary to develop material adjustments and prepare a draft of the Authority?s annual financial statements versus contracting with its auditor for these services. View of Responsible Officials (Corrective Action): Management has made an ongoing evaluation of the respective costs and benefits of obtaining internal or external resources, specifically for the preparation of financial statements, and has determined that the additional benefits derived from implementing such a system would not outweigh the costs incurred to do so. Management will continue to review the draft financial statements and notes prior to approving them and accepting responsibility for their content and presentation.
2017-001 ? Material Audit Adjustments, Financial Statement Preparation, and Preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (Repeat Finding) Finding Type: Material weakness over financial reporting. Criteria: Management is responsible for establishing, maintaining, and monitoring internal controls, and for the fair presentation in the financial statements of financial position, results of operations, and cash flows, including the recording of all appropriate journal entries, so that the trial balances from which the audited financial statements are prepared, reflect amounts that are in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. In addition, the Authority is required to prepare appropriate financial statements, including the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the ?Schedule?). Condition/Finding: We prepared, and management approved of, significant adjustments to the Authority?s general ledger. Material adjustments were discovered during the audit process and because of this condition, the Authority is not in compliance with the required written procedures under the Uniform Guidance. As is the case with many small and medium-sized governmental units, the Authority has historically relied on its independent external auditor to assist with the preparation of the financial statements, the related notes, the management?s discussion and analysis, and, when applicable, the Schedule as part of its external financial reporting process. Accordingly, the Authority?s ability to prepare financial statements in accordance with GAAP is based, in part, on its reliance on its external auditor, who cannot, by definition, be considered part of the Authority?s internal controls. Having the auditor draft the annual financial statements is allowable under current auditing standards and ethical guidelines and may be the most efficient and effective method for preparation of the Authority?s financial statements. However, when an entity (on its own) lacks the ability to produce financial statements that conform to GAAP, or when material audit adjustments are identified by the auditor, auditing standards require that such conditions be communicated in writing as material weaknesses. This is a repeat finding. Cause: This condition was caused by the Authority?s decision to outsource the preparation of its annual financial statements to the external auditor rather than incur the costs of obtaining the necessary training and expertise required for the Authority to perform this task internally because outsourcing the task is considered more cost effective. Effect: The financial statements, and Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards, were initially materially misstated until adjusting entries were proposed during the audit. Recommendation: We recommend that management continue to monitor the relative costs and benefits of securing the internal or other external resources necessary to develop material adjustments and prepare a draft of the Authority?s annual financial statements versus contracting with its auditor for these services. View of Responsible Officials (Corrective Action): Management has made an ongoing evaluation of the respective costs and benefits of obtaining internal or external resources, specifically for the preparation of financial statements, and has determined that the additional benefits derived from implementing such a system would not outweigh the costs incurred to do so. Management will continue to review the draft financial statements and notes prior to approving them and accepting responsibility for their content and presentation.