Audit 45379

FY End
2022-10-31
Total Expended
$3.10M
Findings
4
Programs
2
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-03-12

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
52009 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - L
52010 2022-002 Material Weakness - N
628451 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - L
628452 2022-002 Material Weakness - N

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
14.134 Mortgage Insurance_rental Housing $3.04M Yes 2
14.191 Multifamily Housing Service Coordinators $55,797 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
FLP8L7MJ42U3 Jody Dimpsey Auditee
7175663166 Jeffrey Walker Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Loan/loan guarantee outstanding balances Accounting Policies: Basis of presentation:The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards includes the federal award activity of the Corporation and is presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The information in the schedule is presented in accordance with Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Therefore, the amounts presented in this schedule may differ from the amounts presented in the preparation of the basic financial statements.None of the federal awards received have been passed through to subrecipients. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development loan program:The Corporation received a U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development insured loan under Section 207 pursuant to Section 223(f) of the National Housing Act. The loan balance outstanding at the date of issuance is included in the federal expenditures presented in this schedule. The loan balance outstanding as of October 31, 2022 was $2,979,622 De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. MORTGAGE INSURANCE_RENTAL HOUSING (14.134) - Balances outstanding at the end of the audit period were 2979622.

Finding Details

Internal control over compliance / compliance Finding number 2022-001 Section 207 pursuant to Section 223(f) loan Condition and criteria: As required by the Section 207 pursuant to Section 223(f) HUD insured loan, the Corporation is required to prepare and submit monthly reports of excess income (Form HUD-93094) in accordance with HUD instructions and in a timely manner. The contracted management company, on behalf of the Corporation, had failed to timely submit one of the monthly reports of excess income for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2022. Cause: For the fiscal year ended October 31, 2022, the Corporation did not have adequate internal controls over compliance in place for the area of reporting to ensure all required financial reporting was filed timely. Effect: As a result of failing to properly submit required financial reporting in a timely manner, the Corporation and management company was not in compliance with the reporting compliance requirement, and could have been restricted from entering into any new business with HUD. Recommendation: The Corporation, along with the contracted management company, should develop effective internal control procedures to ensure all required financial reporting is filed timely. The Corporation?s and contracted management company?s response: The contracted management company took the appropriate steps to set up automatic reporting for property managers each month.
Internal control over compliance / compliance Finding number 2022-002 Section 207 pursuant to Section 223(f) loan Condition and criteria: As required by the Section 207 pursuant to Section 223(f) HUD insured loan, the Corporation is required to keep funds collected as a security deposit in the name of the project, in an account separate and apart from all other funds of the project, with the amount of this account at all times equal to or exceeding the aggregate of all outstanding security deposits. All disbursements from the security deposit account must be only for refunds to tenants and for payment of expenses incurred by or on behalf of the tenant. The contracted management company had transferred funds out of the security deposit account to the operating account to cover operations during the fiscal year ended October 31, 2022, leaving insufficient funds in the security deposit account to cover outstanding security deposits. Cause: For the fiscal year ended October 31, 2022, the Corporation did not have adequate internal controls over compliance in place for the area of special tests and provisions to ensure that the security deposit account funds were properly always separated from other funds of the Corporation. Effect: As a result of unallowable disbursements from the security deposit account, the Corporation and management company was not in compliance with the special tests and provisions compliance requirement, may not have sufficient funds to cover the security deposit liability and could be restricted from entering into any new business with HUD. Recommendation: The Corporation, along with the contracted management company, should develop effective internal control procedures to ensure that the security deposit account always have sufficient funds to cover the security deposit liability and that no unallowable disbursements from the account occur. The Corporation?s and contracted management company?s response: The contracted management company took the appropriate steps to set up controls over the security deposit account to ensure only allowable disbursements occur, and that the account funds are always sufficiently separated to cover the security deposit liability.
Internal control over compliance / compliance Finding number 2022-001 Section 207 pursuant to Section 223(f) loan Condition and criteria: As required by the Section 207 pursuant to Section 223(f) HUD insured loan, the Corporation is required to prepare and submit monthly reports of excess income (Form HUD-93094) in accordance with HUD instructions and in a timely manner. The contracted management company, on behalf of the Corporation, had failed to timely submit one of the monthly reports of excess income for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2022. Cause: For the fiscal year ended October 31, 2022, the Corporation did not have adequate internal controls over compliance in place for the area of reporting to ensure all required financial reporting was filed timely. Effect: As a result of failing to properly submit required financial reporting in a timely manner, the Corporation and management company was not in compliance with the reporting compliance requirement, and could have been restricted from entering into any new business with HUD. Recommendation: The Corporation, along with the contracted management company, should develop effective internal control procedures to ensure all required financial reporting is filed timely. The Corporation?s and contracted management company?s response: The contracted management company took the appropriate steps to set up automatic reporting for property managers each month.
Internal control over compliance / compliance Finding number 2022-002 Section 207 pursuant to Section 223(f) loan Condition and criteria: As required by the Section 207 pursuant to Section 223(f) HUD insured loan, the Corporation is required to keep funds collected as a security deposit in the name of the project, in an account separate and apart from all other funds of the project, with the amount of this account at all times equal to or exceeding the aggregate of all outstanding security deposits. All disbursements from the security deposit account must be only for refunds to tenants and for payment of expenses incurred by or on behalf of the tenant. The contracted management company had transferred funds out of the security deposit account to the operating account to cover operations during the fiscal year ended October 31, 2022, leaving insufficient funds in the security deposit account to cover outstanding security deposits. Cause: For the fiscal year ended October 31, 2022, the Corporation did not have adequate internal controls over compliance in place for the area of special tests and provisions to ensure that the security deposit account funds were properly always separated from other funds of the Corporation. Effect: As a result of unallowable disbursements from the security deposit account, the Corporation and management company was not in compliance with the special tests and provisions compliance requirement, may not have sufficient funds to cover the security deposit liability and could be restricted from entering into any new business with HUD. Recommendation: The Corporation, along with the contracted management company, should develop effective internal control procedures to ensure that the security deposit account always have sufficient funds to cover the security deposit liability and that no unallowable disbursements from the account occur. The Corporation?s and contracted management company?s response: The contracted management company took the appropriate steps to set up controls over the security deposit account to ensure only allowable disbursements occur, and that the account funds are always sufficiently separated to cover the security deposit liability.