Audit 45362

FY End
2022-03-31
Total Expended
$1.20M
Findings
2
Programs
2
Organization: Housing Authority of Pineville (KY)
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2022-11-20

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
43702 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - N
620144 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - N

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
14.872 Public Housing Capital Fund $712,304 Yes 1
14.850 Public and Indian Housing $489,803 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
HN3XA6JHLFTS Courtney Musick Auditee
6063372900 Roy W Henderson JR Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: Note 1 Basis of PresentationThe accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the "Schedule") includes the federal award activity of the Authority under programs of the federal government for the year ended March 31, 2022. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Authority, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net position, or cash flows of the Authority. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: The auditee used the de minimis cost rate.

Finding Details

2022-001 CFDA #14.872 ? Public Housing Capital Funds Program ? Wage Rate Requirements Condition and Criteria: The Authority was not able to provide necessary documentation that includes Record of Employee Interviews form HUD-11 as required by the Department of Labor?s Davis-Bacon Act. The Davis-Bacon Act requires a contractor whose contract is over $2,000 to provide weekly certified payrolls to prove that they are paying prevailing wage rates. The Authority is required to perform contractor employee interviews and document on form HUD-11. Amount of Questioned Costs: None. Context: It was determined that the internal controls over Davis-Bacon wage rate requirements were likely to be ineffective due to the fact that the Authority explained that they did not perform contractor employee interviews for the D.W. Builders contract that was selected for audit testing. The Authority was unable to provide the documentation of form HUD-11. Cause: A procedure does not exist whereby the Authority interviews contracted employees to ensure they are being paid fairly per Davis-Bacon wage rate requirements. Effect: The Authority does not have proper controls in place to ensure compliance with the Department of Labor?s Davis-Bacon Act. As a result, contractors could be underpaying works while working on Authority projects. Auditor?s Recommendation: We recommend that the Authority implement procedures to interview employees to ascertain that information is accurate reported on the weekly certified payroll reports is accurate and to document this information on form HUD-11. We also recommend that the Authority maintain this documentation in the contract file. Grantee Response: Management acknowledges the finding and will follow the auditor?s recommendation.
2022-001 CFDA #14.872 ? Public Housing Capital Funds Program ? Wage Rate Requirements Condition and Criteria: The Authority was not able to provide necessary documentation that includes Record of Employee Interviews form HUD-11 as required by the Department of Labor?s Davis-Bacon Act. The Davis-Bacon Act requires a contractor whose contract is over $2,000 to provide weekly certified payrolls to prove that they are paying prevailing wage rates. The Authority is required to perform contractor employee interviews and document on form HUD-11. Amount of Questioned Costs: None. Context: It was determined that the internal controls over Davis-Bacon wage rate requirements were likely to be ineffective due to the fact that the Authority explained that they did not perform contractor employee interviews for the D.W. Builders contract that was selected for audit testing. The Authority was unable to provide the documentation of form HUD-11. Cause: A procedure does not exist whereby the Authority interviews contracted employees to ensure they are being paid fairly per Davis-Bacon wage rate requirements. Effect: The Authority does not have proper controls in place to ensure compliance with the Department of Labor?s Davis-Bacon Act. As a result, contractors could be underpaying works while working on Authority projects. Auditor?s Recommendation: We recommend that the Authority implement procedures to interview employees to ascertain that information is accurate reported on the weekly certified payroll reports is accurate and to document this information on form HUD-11. We also recommend that the Authority maintain this documentation in the contract file. Grantee Response: Management acknowledges the finding and will follow the auditor?s recommendation.